~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Why did this die so quickly?Yes, I already addressed that flaw, and I never said anything to contradict innocent until proven guilty. Either way, as I said before my original point was never about how to best respond to potential crimes. Originally I was only making the point that removing the gendered terms from comparisons like this can prevent gender from becoming an unnecessary factor distracting from relevant differences and the importance of fact finding. The person-A, person-B scenario was only a means to illustrate… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/09/22 05:08 AM |
| 1 | Why did this die so quickly?Kinda missed the point there didn't ya. But fair enough, if we're being literal about it - Another key difference is that the perpetrator, Person-B has already ADMITTED to the crime, which Person-A did not for a very long time, even after victims stepped forward. And even after several victims stepped forward it was Person-A's eventual admission of guilt that got them imprisoned. Your point is valid though, due diligence tells us that now that the perpetrator has admitted to the crime the next r… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/09/22 06:04 PM |
| 3 | Why did this die so quickly?You know, if you take away the labels "men" and "women" when describing these types of things it all becomes a lot more clear. e.g. Person-B has admitted to drugging people and robbing them. Person-A broke the law in a very similar way and we all agreed locking them away was the best course of action. Given this information, what should we do about Person-B??? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/09/22 10:01 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter