TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

eDgEIN708 Archive

View 3 posts and 463 comments by eDgEIN708 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Nice strawman Well I had to try to match the quality of the strawman argument I was replying to. it's the Republicans attacking our voting and bodily autonomy rights while at the same time eroding social safety nets that the Republicans rely on the most I see the hyperbole stores in your area are having a sale, too!
/r/MensRights06/05/20 02:22 PM
6

"It's a job interview."
/r/MensRights06/05/20 11:03 AM
-2

That's a lotta hyperbole! At least the Democrats are less likely to kill you. You think it's better that they want to strip everyone's rights and turn them into tax cows while they crack the whip to keep people on their plantation? Most people don't enjoy being on their knees that much.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 11:00 AM
25

Wait, that's not decorative?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/20 10:48 AM
43

No joke, I had an English teacher in high school who had a "dictionary" filled exclusively with words that are "sexist" and alternatives to those words. Words like "manhole" or "mankind". Her cats still loved her, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/20 11:46 AM
2

It's called equality*. You're forgetting the asterisk.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 04:21 AM
2

It certainly started out that way, but since the left started using the term "alt right", the net has effectively gotten so broad as to encompass anything they disagree with. I mean, they call Tim Pool and Joe Rogan "alt right" now. It's lost all meaning when used by that group, at this point, by being thrown around so liberally at anyone who doesn't subscribe to their insanity.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:11 PM
23

Because "alt right" has meant "anything they disagree with" since they started using the term.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 12:42 PM
5

F
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/19 05:48 PM
92

It's a Newfoundland accent. Trailer Park Boys is a Nova Scotia accent.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/19 01:58 AM
66

Reminds me of Ms Choksondik. It's a good thing she never caught up to them, or she may have had to raise her arm to hit the guy, and nobody wants that.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/19 03:42 PM
2

Feckless!
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/19 11:11 PM
46

You're not that far off.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/19 07:34 PM
36

None of them come close to those images.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/19 07:32 PM
43

Seriously... Holy shit if this was my daughter I'd be rooting for the bear so that I don't have to be ashamed of her anymore.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/18 12:39 PM
7

See?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/18 11:35 AM
11

Everyone's lives got better except for a handful of loud people on the internet who open wide for a CNN and Buzzfeed and Vox bukkakefest.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/18 11:25 AM
7

get off your high horse lol.. the guy you're replying to is not the one supporting the party that needs to collectively get off their high horse.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/18 11:22 AM
6

I'm in the US so maybe my attitude toward police is different here. Maybe. All of the US media I've seen portrays cops the way you describe, instead of as they really are, and the constant "if it bleeds it leads" state of what passes for "news" over there sensationalizes absolutely everything. It's what leads to things like protest groups being misled into thinking cops are all brutalizing racists.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/18 11:25 AM
73

No no, they've decided, they just can't admit to themselves that what they've decided and what they say they've decided aren't the same thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/18 11:17 AM
1253

Down Syndrome kids have a whole extra chromosome, therefore they're superior to women. It's science.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/18 11:35 AM
3

a.k.a. Trump Derangement Syndrome.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 10:47 AM
55

This is the first time I hear the term "grievance studies". I hope that's a thing now.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:19 PM
21

Yeah, I tought for sure I'd seen a picture floating around of her taking a selfie with him in bed, all smiles and happy.. you know.. as you are after being sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:28 PM
24

Wow. Her parents must be heartbroken to have raised that.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/18 06:31 AM
2

Like it or not, the word "feminism" still carries plenty of weight with plenty of people. You keep implying that my use of the term means that I'm someone supporting the garbage human beings who use the term for evil, but so long as the term carries weight, the more people who let it go, the more evil it can do in the hands of those disgusting people. Maybe you don't see things the same way I do, but I'd much rather see more people stand up and say "I'm a feminist and if you think you can't be s…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 06:43 PM
1

It's a shame you're so eager to let them win.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 07:55 AM
0

These 'not real' feminists are all talking for you, Only if people accept their definition of feminism. We shouldn't.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 08:12 PM
2

The problem is that feminism can't be cleaned up without tearing it down. It needs to be rebuilt either by popular opinion to change course and uproot the organizations that command it or by opposing it with another movement that can defend or at least respect women's rights pretty well. Great! Do that! By all means!
/r/MensRights25/06/18 08:11 PM
1

Those actions don't sound very feminist at all. It's a shame that people like that use that name as a shield.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:27 PM
0

I don't. The dictionary has a definition, and neither "misandry" nor "equity" are a part of it.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:25 PM
0

Why should we grant you the benefit on the doubt when the feminists with media influence and institutional positions that do engage with these issues honestly and openly don't exceed the count on a single hand minus the thumb? I don't care if you give me the benefit of the doubt. You, some random internet feminists, is the one true feminists. Its not NOW who continue to campaign against fathers and joint custody. Its not the university professors who argue that wife's who murder their husbands s…
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:09 PM
7

It's a shame you think that. Personally, I've found it easier to convince people that the toxic misandrists and opportunists aren't really feminists at all, than to convince people that "feminism is bad". Feminism needs to be cleaned up, and until actual feminists start calling out bullshit, the bullshit artists are just going to run rampant. No one is using me. No one is telling me what to believe. I'm not supporting anyone's bullshit. Way to put on a friendly face for someone who's agreeing wi…
/r/MensRights25/06/18 03:24 PM
4

Why do you have to bring your mother into this?
/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:26 PM
11

Well, then there's the other (much rarer) type like me who doesn't think the MRM or issues like this should conflict with feminism at all, and who thinks it's great that attention gets drawn to issues like this on both sides because everyone deserves not to be raped regardless of their gender.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:19 PM
16

Indeed. As an old-school dictionary-definition feminist, I really loathe this trend of encouraging people to see genitalia (or skin color, or any superficial factor) as something that should be taken into consideration like this. It is the exact opposite of the cause of equality when you make it a factor. We should absolutely encourage women to seek out those roles, but to hand out positions like that based on genitals is exactly the kind of practice both feminists and MRAs should be working tog…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:54 PM
2

The good ones have the same goal. I completely agree that the "modern" feminist movement is identity politics garbage and is more disgustingly sexist than anything it has ever tried to combat, but I'm talking about the classical feminists who actually care about equality whether that means good or bad. Those feminists share a common goal with purist MRA groups, and honestly, I'd rather see people who fall under the latter definition stand up and call out the former than to just have everyone who…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 10:47 PM
5

You don't have to not be a feminist anymore. Just be a good one. There are far too many who are far too eager to use bad science or use sexism as a solution for imbalances, and that needs to get called out by people who represent real feminism - the kind that's actually about equality and not equity. The kind that wouldn't conflict at all with MRA ideals because all both sides want is actual equality. I think feminism, right now, really needs a good dose of sanity, and if you're still "in" with …
/r/MensRights16/06/18 07:47 PM
3

He wasn't fooling himself. He wanted to get in.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/18 12:38 PM
4

You mean the self-defence?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/18 10:27 AM
18

Let's hope her threshold for what constitutes "abuse" is the same for both genders.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 11:49 AM
19

They have to pay you double because you're double trans now.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/18 12:15 PM
3

According to antifa's tardcancer ideology, police are fascists because they protect fascists. Believe me when I say that their capacity for projection is beyond belief, and so everyone who isn't them is a fascist.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 01:24 PM
5

Their retarded ideology.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 11:37 AM
305

Come on, by that logic you'd only have one set of standards for everyone! That's preposterous!
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/18 12:24 PM
11

MR should not be about robbing feminists of legitimate struggles Nobody's robbing them of legitimate struggles, we're robbing them of retarded bullshit struggles like claiming that the word "mankind" is discriminatory.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:22 PM
3

Looks like you've had a bit too much to think!
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:19 PM
8

"I'm honored, but I must decline, for the reason that my manager is a racist and a sexist who pushes their bigoted ideology on their employees."
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:58 PM
1

Right, so my arguments are based on facts and logic and not retarded lefty feefees. What's your point?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/18 11:32 AM
6

Shit, why not, I'll come forward too. I was there, and she totally raped him, and I saw her steal $800,000 cash that he had on the counter. Better lock her up because I said so!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/18 11:58 AM
3

It's haram anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/18 06:50 PM
45

Figures it would involve munching.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/18 06:48 PM
31

Yeah. You're using the dictionary definition, the one women should actually try to live up to, and he's using the real-world definition based on the people who call his example "feminism" shouting so loudly that this is what feminism is, while no one from the dictionary definition school of feminism challenges them on it.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 04:18 PM
3

Come on... the last sentence isn't so bad, at least!
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:11 PM
2

That's easy. Feminism is why. See, feminism taught him that he should treat females with respect, because evil males never treat women with respect. Therefore, no man could ever treat her more respectfully than him, a male feminist. It was therefore important that if anyone teaches her about sex, it should be someone who respects her, like he does. Feminism also taught him that it's important to be sex-positive - you must never shame women for whatever their sexual desires may be, and you need t…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 02:10 PM
5

Huh. I interpreted that to mean: "I didn't think he'd do this to a child because he convinced me through relentless emotional manipulation and gaslighting."
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:53 PM
7

Meh. I mean, on the one hand I'm glad monsters like this guy are getting put in places where they don't treat child rapists kindly, but on the other hand I'm sure this is just going to reinforce their narrative. "Even our male allies are gross monsters, imagine what other men are like!" I mean, don't get me wrong, putting this monster away is way more important than a few retards' perception of men becoming slightly more retarded, but once they catch on to the trend there's no way in hell they c…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:50 PM
19

I think it's safe to say that most people aren't going to buy her fake news.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/17 10:36 AM
66

This is my favorite coopted saying of them all.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:10 PM
1

Yeah, I'm more talking about the kind of woman who are writing an article about this being the sort who would get insulted, not about overweight women in general. I know plenty who are cool people and feel the same way you do about it.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:32 PM
8

How much do you want to bet that these same ladybeasts would be insulted if a man rejected them because they're not attracted to lazy lardasses?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 11:59 AM
38

How did it ever get this bad? Participation trophies.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/17 11:37 PM
93

Well she is a fascist, so....
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/17 11:35 PM
118

Yep. This is pussypass material.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:10 PM
8

Who knew peeing in the snow would make me better at putting numbers into a formula?!
/r/MensRights16/09/17 03:58 AM
12

Imagine a bowl full of mothers, and 10% of them are poison. Would you want your child grabbing a handful?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/17 10:21 AM
50

Only when it's convenient.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:52 AM
5

Early childhood education from university of Melbourne, according to her linkedin. It doesn't mention whether the name comes from personal retardation, or a family history of retardation.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 01:14 PM
1

Right. Because they're not as good.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/17 08:16 PM
1

Not in the west, and when the discussion centers around the barriers women face when compared to men. The average person has a shit ton of pressures and barriers on them regardless of their gender, but people breaking free of cultural stigmatism - especially where gender is concerned - is encouraged by society at large here. For both men and women. No one tells their little girls "no you can't do that job when you grow up, that's a boy's job" anymore, and if they do, by the time that girl's 18 s…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 05:07 AM
1

Don't see why we should be putting gender aside, since it's the entire basis of the conversation. But yes, I'd say they do have the same capability for success, if we're using the word 'capability' in the same way.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 06:25 PM
11

Shit, I was being nice about it. Not only is the exact same path available to her, all of society is rooting for her, will help her along the way, and call her a hero for doing it. I mean, maybe you live in some backwards country, but in most civilized countries the only barrier is in your own head.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 10:35 AM
74

Cultural stigmatism is only a barrier if you allow it to be.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:30 AM
1082

Also, just like in real life, there is literally nothing standing in her way if she chose to take the escalator.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 10:45 PM
18

And he played them back-to-back. And he smoked.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 02:34 PM
2

Why is this ok? Because of the number of standards there are.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:17 PM
1

It's funny because I'm sure as the leftest of people they're staunchly against Trump's travel ban, which they would incorrectly equate to "you are banned from entering this country because you come from a country lots of shitty people came from".
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/17 12:50 PM
5

Don't worry. Even when they 'win' they still find a way to complain. They bitched for years about having a woman super hero movie, then when promotional images for one started coming out they bitched about it because she shaved her pits. I wish I were kidding.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 08:21 PM
2

The only difference is that actual hogs serve a purpose in society.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 01:02 PM
1

Probably. When you get banned you get a message that is basically their very own version of Trump's travel ban. They say "you come from a country sub that we get a lot of terrorists bad hombres from therefore you're not allowed to enter our country sub". They've become what they hate, it's hilarious.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 12:58 PM
1

Yeah, I mean, they'll definitely try to convince you that you have some obligation to pay, but really it's on them for not having asked beforehand what the payment arrangements are. It's the reason that it's becoming more common to ask "will these be on separate bills" as you're ordering, depending on the composition of your party.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/17 01:31 PM
5

You'd pay for what you ordered, and if it comes down to it you give them whatever contact information you have for the other party. If it gets as far as them involving the police for some reason, you give the police her information, and walk out feeling happy to have dodged a bullet. Worst case, you're banned from the restaurant. Which is how they try to avoid people who do this deliberately.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/17 01:20 PM
4

Fair enough!
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/17 04:39 PM
44

If by "doxxed" you mean people followed her to her Instagram account based on her posting it all over and the fact that her username here and there were almost identical, then I guess she did.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/17 04:30 PM
1

There's a difference between defending his ideas and defending his right not to be assaulted for having them, or for showing up at a free speech rally.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/17 05:32 PM
2

I'd say throwing bottles into a crowd puts you squarely in the fight. The only way it's a sucker punch is if she's so retarded that she didn't expect the people she was assaulting to defend themselves. But no, she had plenty of time to see it coming. She even had time to try to push him away as he came in swinging.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 08:20 PM
3

You sure have a funny definition of "sucker punch".
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 07:28 PM
2

What you have is pictures of her holding the bottle, nothing more. Not true. I also have her statement regarding her intent to injure people. Yes, please believe the hivemind, censorship-ridden subreddit. You mean over believing the hivemind, censorship-driven gang of masked thugs who brain innocent people with bike locks? Gladly. The worst I'd get from the t_d side is being banned from a subreddit that is clear and genuine about the rules of their online forum and not, you know, stitches. And t…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 04:10 PM
14

Have you ever been in a fight with a much weaker opponent who is brandishing a weapon?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 02:41 PM
6

Yah, I'm sure the bottle's disappearance is explained by her setting it peacefully into a recycling bin and not by her throwing it into the crowd she'd gone there to scalp. And yes, I'm aware of t_d's much more accurate interpretation of their moniker.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 02:39 PM
11

Seems to me her definition of "Nazi" both at the time she wrote that and at the time she was throwing bottles indiscriminately into a crowd was "people who go to free speech rallies".
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 02:26 PM
17

So? I might not agree with what he has to say, but I'll defend to the death his right not to be assaulted while he says it. Which he probably wasn't even doing here anyway, considering the rally he was at had nothing to do with white supremacy.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 02:16 PM
6

Do you see the killing or the scalping of Nazis in a negative way? Yes, if you take into consideration her very, very loose definition of the word "Nazi".
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 02:06 PM
3

I can help: I advise you to steer clear.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 02:02 PM
11

No, Trump supporters went to a rally in a place where police had previously been ordered to stand down and let them be attacked, and had battle gear on-hand because antifa has attacked them in the past and has been broadcasting their intent to do the same thing again, with the police once again being ordered to take no action. Yes, she's the problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 02:01 PM
20

You mean the ones showing up to a rally in the same place where police were previously ordered to stand down and let antifa attack them with impunity? Nah. I think it's reasonable to say that they just showed up to a rally prepared to deal with assholes.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 01:54 PM
238

Someone ever tries to kill you, you try an' kill 'em right back.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/17 07:26 PM
4

If she committed a crime, such as trespassing in his vehicle after being asked to leave, he is well within his rights to detain her until the police arrive. Which will happen much sooner if he drives her to them. The detention would be perfectly lawful.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 10:54 AM
1

I wonder where she copied that rant from?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 10:54 AM
40

"I self-identify as cleared of all charges!"
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/17 03:29 PM
9

The longer you ride the crazy train, the more those two things overlap.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/17 03:28 PM
44

Is that like how they're so anti-fascist, they're fascist?
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:44 AM
19

Yeah. It's just a way to take a concept e already have a term for - condescension - and imply that it's something that is exclusively done by men. My personal favorite reply is to tell them they need to calm down and stop ovaryacting.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:08 PM
42

That is indeed exactly what they and feminists themselves have been saying for years now.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:35 PM
68

Then I guess they should have also renamed the "Women's March" from the other day too, right?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 01:54 PM
2

Learning from their mistakes was never their strong point. That's what happens, I guess, when you teach them that everyone's a winner.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/17 05:41 PM
63

I'm absolutely shocked that their "if you even partially agree with any of Trump's points you're Satan and fuck you" strategy didn't pay off on election day. Shocked, I tell you!
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/17 08:21 AM
-1

Oh absolutely. I just personally am a "taste of their own medicine" type. I make comments like that because when it gets a reaction I get to use any point they bring up against them when I argue that they do exactly the same thing. And also I do it because I just like getting a reaction. ;)
/r/MensRights12/01/17 05:21 PM
8

You and I both know that female victim reeked of internalized misogyny. Seriously, though, you're right. It was a nutjob who happened to be a feminist. My third-wave-feminist-blame-the-group-for-the-actions-of-individuals-style answer was mostly to trigger the lurkers.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 05:08 PM
37

A feminist.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:04 PM
36

So where are all the feminists coming out to talk about how appalling it is that things like this are being done in their name? If this isn't feminism, these "true feminists" you're talking about sure seem strangely ok with it.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 01:24 PM
16

And people believe it.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/16 11:51 AM
4

Humungous WOT?!
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:10 PM
8

Cunts.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:06 PM
18

It doesn't take a sledgehammer to kill someone. A small knife from her bag will do. Shit, just her hitting him the right way in the right spot could do it. The part that was overboard was when it turned from argument to physical fight. And that's on her.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 04:39 PM
11

That's just plain untrue.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 04:03 PM
3

Feminism's solution to a problem is that we need more feminism? I'm shocked. "What's that, good xir? The snake oil I sold you last time I came through town didn't work, you say? Your hair turned blue but none of your problems went away? I've got just the thing for you!"
/r/MensRights17/11/16 01:35 PM
45

I'd put money on some feminist nutjob writing a piece on it titled: "Men's Rights Activists Force London Zoo to Encourage Pedophilia".
/r/MensRights17/11/16 01:18 PM
50

Top universities develop programs meant "to purge toxic blackness". "Many college students...believe that blackness is the root cause of sexual violence, body shaming, and terrorism". "The programs...set up safe spaces for black students to contemplate the toxicity of their blackness".
/r/MensRights14/11/16 06:48 PM
2

That's what he said.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 09:58 AM
0

Wait until you find out that Clinton pays people to do exactly this kind of shit!
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/16 08:36 PM
3

Yeah, that's where I'm at too. Not too sure what's happening or what the backstory is or what's coming from what side.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 09:10 PM
60

We all know women are the primary victims of male unemployment.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 05:56 PM
94

He probably had food.
/r/PussyPass11/10/16 11:23 AM
117

Feminists? Silent? Nah, what happens is that they change the subject to how those jobs only exist because men are pigs, and how much they ruin little girls' lives, and blah blah blah, while completely ignoring any agency on the part of the individual women who work in these industries. They might not be able to argue against that specific point, but that certainly doesn't mean they're about to stop arguing altogether.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 04:13 PM
7

Yep.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:15 PM
36

Pretty much exactly my thoughts on this. It's like when you see them with signs that read "when you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression". Then they pull fire alarms at conferences about men's issues because they're so oppressed. The fuck?
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:13 PM
2

Yeah, I haven't seen it either for the same reason, but the immediate question that comes to mind after reading the title was "what, do you want a cookie for that or something?"
/r/MensRights14/09/16 07:16 PM
1

and I think the general attitude towards trans people in these comments is sort of indicative of the real problem here Are there anti-trans comments being upvoted around here? Or are they anti-social justice comments? Because there's a big difference. That's the defense the social justice crowd uses all the time - to hide behind whatever minority cause they're fighting and claim that if you attack social justice, in this case, you attack trans people. And that's just plain untrue. I don't think …
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:27 PM
5

It's in the same aisle where you find the headlight fluid.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:15 PM
12

Fresh-squeezed!
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:15 PM
36

because they're afraid to talk her Is that why most guys don't say anything? I thought it was because you don't look a gift horse in the mouth. If someone works to prepare me a meal, that's work I didn't have to do myself. I sit there and I eat it without complaining not because I'm afraid to say anything, but because I appreciate the work they put into it and I don't want to taint that with uninvited criticism. If she asks how it is I'll be honest, but if she doesn't I'm not about to bitch abou…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/16 02:47 PM
14

That's what happens when you get so cuntfused.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/16 06:07 PM
46

Yes, he said she was cuntfused.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/16 06:01 PM
27

Or make a movie that looks like it's for 5-year-olds and put queef jokes in it.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 05:22 PM
19

Which makes it quite a layered and intelligent criticism on government intervention. The new movie has queef jokes.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 05:17 PM
40

Yeah? See, I personally think plain old capital punishment is a mercy to pieces of shit like this. I'd be happy to have them suffer. For a long time.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 04:23 PM
1

It's just as disingenuous. Breaking it down to "Physicians and Surgeons" as a single group still doesn't account for the fact that more men choose the higher-paying fields of medicine. If anything, breaking it down this way to make it appear to still be a problem when you break it down makes it worse than people just repeating the bullshit statistic, because this person is deliberate in their dishonesty. Unless you're looking at the earnings of two different people doing the same hours and amoun…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/16 12:28 PM
1

Spouting that kind of shit is also in the best interest of the party he's part of, though, considering Hillary is running on a vagina-heavy platform.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/16 12:14 PM
4

His name is Colonel Sanders, so I don't think he's trying to claim military experience. FTFY.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/16 02:21 PM
16

I find it so funny how all sorts of people who claim to support gender equality intend on voting for someone because of what's between their legs.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/16 05:56 AM
10

You know, I've seen plenty of debates popping up whenever the topic of disparate gender-based physical requirements is addressed. I've seen so many feminists try to justify the disparate requirements by arguing, for example, that female representation in firefighting is such an important consideration that it trumps the common counterarguments that are often brought up. With women now being eligible for the draft, I would find it absolutely hilarious if all of a sudden having lower standards for…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/16 05:59 PM
36

Not only that, but 9 out of 10 qualified candidates can be women and that still won't mean shit if the 1 remaining candidate happens to be the best person for the job. This commenter seems to be suggesting that if 1 out of 10 of the candidates is a woman, they must choose that woman because vagina.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:53 AM
14

Probably nothing is wrong with the parents - this is all what she said happened. I'd wager it's not exactly the most accurate description of the events.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 06:24 PM
36

Don't you know? That's how equality works, shitlord!
/r/MensRights23/05/16 04:35 PM
2

Exactly. Often it's difficult for them to understand things that go contrary to their brainwashing, so they need a way to brand it as "wrong" without having to actually make a logical argument. It's exactly like when you point out inconsistencies in the Bible to a fundamentalist and they say "stop satansplaining" - it's a way for them to feel like they've won when in reality everyone can see they just don't have a rebuttal and have downed too much of the Kool-aid to be able to consider that thei…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/16 02:01 PM
2

Very fair. I'll change it to be more accurate.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/16 11:07 AM
11

Feminists and social justice tards claim it's when a man explains something to a woman in an overly simplistic way specifically because she's a woman. Except they use it all the time to mean "your opinion isn't valid because of your gender". That means now when someone with a penis makes a valid point using facts and logic, instead of finding the nearest safe space and menstruating together to 4 Non Blondes, they play the "mansplaining" card because they think it makes them winners.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/16 09:41 AM
17

Well in his defense, she was #cuntfusing the issue.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/16 09:31 AM
28

I prefer "broadcasting".
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/16 09:19 AM
10

Stupid shitlord! Don't you know attempted murder = trying to kill someone + power?!
/r/PussyPass11/05/16 06:12 PM
17

Passing the buck is what being an SJW is all about!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/16 05:44 PM
1

Well yes, of course they talk about it the second it actually starts becoming an issue for them. Seems to me there wasn't all that much talk about it while they had the privilege of not having to sign up or go to jail, all that seemed to go on were protests and fire alarms whenever men tried to bring it up. Now that the government's taking that privilege away, all of a sudden it's a big talking point? Yeah. Sorry, not really sure I'm picking up that "feminism helps men too" vibe everyone keeps t…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 01:41 PM
14

It must be nice to have that kind of privilege.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 12:30 PM
14

A handful of them talk about it. Mostly, though, they prefer to pull fire alarms when we talk about it.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 12:29 PM
11

T-T-T-TODAY, JUNIOR!
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/16 03:07 AM
5

It makes you wonder what would push someone to that place. Or, more chillingly, what they're going to be like after being released from their 5 years of prison.
/r/PussyPass20/04/16 04:18 PM
3

You're being very liberal with your use of the word "informational", there.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 11:37 AM
26

Especially when you're talking about rape trials. Those things are, like, so boring to begin with!
/r/MensRights13/04/16 10:26 AM
8

Yep. Men to the back of the train. They should have that same rule for busses. Hell, give men their own water fountains too. You know, like equals.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 06:41 PM
7

Cultural appropriation = doing something from another culture + POWER, shitlord!
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:29 PM
16

I guess she could just not have sex, then.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 02:56 AM
1

Yeah but if 33% of the m&ms are poison then that means they're all poison... or something.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 08:44 PM
22

Ew, I don't want to date a rapist! /s
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:20 PM
7

Yeah, I mean, we're more left wing than the US, for sure, but at the end of the day while we do have some real special snowflakes, most of us have a good head on our shoulders. We had an opposing political party leader openly talking about how the decision to refuse refugees who are single men was sexist. And he wasn't picked apart any more than normal by the media.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 05:59 PM
2

Come on.. you can't expect sense from these people..
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:14 PM
5

Easier how? She's under contract with them. If they let her go she could go off and make money for any of their rivals, whereas keeping her under the contract pretty much costs them nothing if she's not making music.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/16 08:29 PM
12

Not only that, after throwing down the gauntlet like that and getting your ass handed to you, you just go ahead and put a lower number on there and act as if it's on the world to prove you wrong? That's cute.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/16 01:34 PM
10

What about Vaginas and Penises though? Are they also social constructs? Yes, they are. I know because I read it on tumblr.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/16 01:25 PM
32

Go with "cuntsplainer". They hate that one a lot.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 01:16 PM
2

How many cunts do we have in this sub, anyway?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/16 03:25 PM
2

WORLDSTAAAAAAAAR!
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/16 03:22 PM
60

Or do feminists always only see the 'privilege' and don't ever see the responsibility that goes with it? That's exactly what I see. They want equal rights, not equal responsibilities or consequences.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:13 AM
2

Since it's very clear you can't even keep track of what you've said, it's no wonder you're so lost in this conversation. I'm not about to bother going through it all again like it's an ELI5 for you, so you just go on believing you're right, bud. Have a good one.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/16 04:42 PM
3

Yeah. And the part you quote: Rape, as defined by the NCVS doesn't refer to reference number 1, it refers to the "National Crime Victimization Survey", reference number 2. You were wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/16 03:19 PM
2

When you said: The section talking about pregnancy is referring to the statistics used to take the survey (hence why it was extrapolated to the pregnancy calculation) You most certainly were wrong. That little "1" next to the "1 in 6" means it relates to the reference prefaced by a "1". And that is most certainly not the study referenced by the quote you made earlier. So you were wrong. You did manage to link to a report about the correct study, though, which I had looked up back when you were s…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/16 01:41 PM
1

You're wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/16 08:37 AM
4

Personally, I'd be quite happy with teach women not to rape as well. As would I. And that's really the point. It's fine to teach people not to rape, but it's not a gendered issue.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 08:32 PM
5

Reality.. you keep using that word.. I do not think it means what you think it means..
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 07:36 PM
8

Is there anything left up your ass after you pulled that out?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 07:19 PM
3

Neither. Teaching people not to rape is fine. Framing it as a gendered issue when it isn't is the problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 05:30 PM
6

under the guise of that supposed focus on men When the topic is "teach men not to rape", that focus is not "supposed". You never see the argument until sexists start implying that men are the problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 04:31 PM
3

Yes, that sentence is pulled from the section referring specifically to the data regarding pregnancy during rape. It's not in reference to data relating to the "1 in 6" claim. Keep throwing out the insults, though. It really makes you look cool.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 03:58 PM
2

No one is saying that we shouldn't try to prevent sexual assault. Why should we try to teach women not to throw babies into dumpsters? If throwing babies into dumpsters is a concern, shouldn't we be teaching everyone not to throw babies into dumpsters? Rape isn't a gendered problem. I've seen more girls dragging barely-conscious drunk guys they don't think they'd otherwise have a chance with into a bedroom at parties than I've seen guys doing the same to girls. Hell, girls can corner a guy and g…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 03:37 PM
4

Ah, I see you're using results based on the studies that include "has a male looked at you funny" as rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 03:24 PM
4

Yet, here you have a bunch of bitter manchildren think that because a few women dumped newborns in a trashcan (as if that is remotely relevant), men shouldn't be taught that sexual assault is a real and serious issue? Way to miss the point. Literally nobody here is saying rape is ok. Nobody. But you know what? I've been to college too. I've seen girls wait until a guy she likes is practically passed out and then drag him into a bedroom. I've seen guys get cornered by girls they don't want anythi…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 03:08 PM
8

Why? Because they're not in prison so they think it doesn't apply to them. I'm not in Iowa. Guess rapes there don't matter, right? Who gives a shit?! It's only Iowa!
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 02:44 PM
1

things that young people especially don't necessarily know See, this I can get behind. Young people need to be taught how to act responsibly. Not just young men. Young women do things all the time that would fall under the same rape umbrella as young men, and yet the message is "boys need to learn that rape is bad" as if it's a gendered problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 02:41 PM
26

It's not a gendered problem. The kind of rape you're describing happens just as often both ways. So why do we need to teach men not to rape?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 02:36 PM
10

Internalized misogyny?
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:14 PM
15

Equality says you can stand just like a man would. Dude, that's not how feminism works at all. Women are supposed to be held to different standards than men. That's what makes them equal! Don't you know anything?!
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/15 08:34 AM
161

That would mean women would have to be held to the same set of standards as men. That's not how feminism works.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 02:25 PM
56

That's not how feminism works. Women are held to different standards than men - that's what makes them equal!
/r/MensRights27/11/15 02:24 PM
18

They're even already helping men along in that regard - every time someone calls a man a rapist because they changed their mind a month later or accuses someone of rape so their boyfriend doesn't think they were willing, they're watering down the label so much that it becomes meaningless. Once they drill it into the public's heads enough that looking at a woman without signed consent forms in triplicate is "rape", it's not going to matter anymore whether or not you get accused of rape because th…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 02:20 PM
2

To be fair, pretty much every baby-murderer is that baby's mother.
/r/PussyPass26/11/15 03:56 PM
12

When a baby is murdered, the killer is disproportionately the baby's mother. So banning mothers from being with their babies is a good first step, right?
/r/PussyPass26/11/15 03:53 PM
5

Yeah it's a shame they seem to share a common enemy - equality.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 03:53 PM
52

Don't you pay attention to modern feminism? Lying = rape now. Unless the person doing the raping is woman, then it's not rape it's sexual assault. Like how if the woman is raping a child it's "an affair".
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/15 03:53 PM
3

Equality*!
/r/MensRights08/11/15 03:55 PM
6

You mean to tell me that there are feminists who don't agree with the idea of a woman being treated as an equal? I'm shocked. /s Their brand of "equality" always comes with an asterisk that says "when it works in my favor". Not surprised they come to a place that values actual equality and try to stir the shit. Can't have anyone thinking "equality" doesn't need an asterisk, eh?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/15 07:20 PM
4

How could you not put Short Circuit on that list?! :(
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:01 PM
18

Oh shit! I was scared there for a second because it came so late...
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/15 08:32 PM
3

I love the part where she goes after the white knight. I wish they'd learn a lesson from this.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/15 12:31 PM
104

Because women are held to different standards than men. That's what makes them equal. /s
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:48 AM
2

She's empowering herself, and doing so in a way that doesn't rely on trashing anyone else to do it! Hell yeah that's awesome! It's easy to make yourself feel good by being a bully and shitting all over others. The problem is that then you're nothing more than a bully. It's the ultimate low road.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:14 PM
4

She could have easily ran away from him too.
/r/PussyPass15/09/15 04:24 PM
8

The reversed genders headline would read: Boy gets laughed at for trying to press assault charges against girl who kissed him on a dare.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:06 PM
6

As I read that, I imagined it as being narrated over photos of Dworkin and fire alarms being pulled and various rainbow-haired people with a big block of text at the bottom that says "THIS IS WHAT FEMINISTS ACTUALLY BELIEVE".
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:00 PM
0

Yeah guys. You don't want to have to do some dumb animal cruelty workshop, do you?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 06:42 PM
116

Yeah, I'm positive their first target will be anyone who says "kill all men", right?
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:06 PM
4

Thank you man. I wish you all the best, happy father's day to you too!
/r/MensRights21/06/15 07:23 PM
49

To be fair, "leaked" implies that it was once private and was released. This was on a live television broadcast he knew he would be on and agreed to be on. It's a wardrobe malfunction more than it is a private photo someone made public. Not saying it's right for people to spread it around like this, but it's definitely different from "the fappening".
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:58 PM
8

That would require self-awareness.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 12:32 PM
76

Yeah. I really find it difficult to sympathize with someone who has a problem that's so big they need to vent about it, but who isn't looking for a solution to the problem. I find myself just constantly wondering how many times I'm going to have to hear about this same problem before they do something about it. It makes me think they enjoy having problems.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:07 PM
9

Most of the "anti-feminist" sentiment on Reddit is just anti-tumblr-feminist sentiment, they just prefer to use the term "anti-feminist" because that way feminism becomes their shield. I'd say probably most of the people they call "anti-feminist" don't have a problem with feminism when it means "equality" rather than "equality when I stand to benefit", nor are they anti-women in any capacity. I think there's a widespread anti-tumblr-feminism sentiment on Reddit, but that's very different both fr…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:10 PM
11

The response is, there is much more theft than there are rapes, so rape isn't even worth talking about.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 02:08 AM
3

Yeah!
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:21 AM
1

Well it's a good thing you're in charge of deciding what constitutes harassment instead of someone with a failed gender discrimination lawsuit under her belt that she feels makes her a victim of the evil Patriarchy™ permeating both the business sector and the justice system.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:15 AM
3

While I agree one hundred percent with what you have to say here, Chairman Pao doesn't strike me as the kind of person who has ever been interested in coming to a consensus on anything.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:10 AM
3

I'd argue that if you go back far enough, we're all the majority. Go Team Human!
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:04 AM
11

Okay, calm down, there, Semenpenis.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:51 AM
2

Even if the statistic was accurate, I'll let the Captain field this one.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 01:21 PM
4

Do they actually go more frequently, or is that anecdotal? For what reason do they take longer? (Again, is that just anecdotal?)
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:48 PM
4

What existing problem would that be?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:31 PM
1

Let me go a different route, then. What's the difference between these boys sharing nude photos of underage girls, and a photo that same girl sent them of her dog? Would they be punished for that? If not, what's the difference if not the content of the photo? You can't just say that the content isn't important.
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 05:44 PM
1

My argument is that one isn't worse than the other, and that both sides are committing the same crime - distributing child pornography. Just because one of them is distributing it to individuals and another is distributing it publicly, that doesn't make one more wrong than the other. Otherwise, how many people do you have to distribute child porn to before it's a crime?
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 03:57 PM
1

It may not be exploitative, but that's not the question. The question is: is it legal? It's production of child pornography regardlss of whether or not it's done willingly.
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 02:04 PM
8

So as long as you're privately sharing child pornography, that's different from publicly sharing it? Is one of those things "more ok" than the other?
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 12:22 PM
4

So they're all even on the distribution point, but the girls are still up by one with the production.
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 12:10 PM
65

TIL possessing child pornography is worse than creating and distributing child pornography.
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 10:22 AM
3

things actually tend to get toned down slightly whenever a girl is involved. Sounds to me like being a girl comes with certain... privileges.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:33 PM
1

That's horrible. I wish I could be of more help, and I'm glad to hear that you could at least do that much for him. Thank you.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:06 AM
21

I don't have much experience in that field, certainly not in the US. I did, however, unsuccessfully fight against my city's decision to shut down the only men's shelter we had. The best thing that you can do right now, I think, is to spread the word. Get people to acknowledge that it isn't just women who suffer. As for suggestions to that effect, do you think this particular man, and men like him, would be interested in talking about their experiences on camera? A video or a series of videos tal…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:16 PM
4

Yeah, over at /r/KotakuInAction whenever something like this gets aired we've been pretty enthusiastic about all the new traffic we get. The people in the media trying so hard to convince everyone that this is about misogynistic gaming neckbeards are so god damned over-the-top cartoonishly ridiculous about it that anyone sane who comes by KiA pretty instantly sees that everything they've heard is bullshit. It's been kind of fun watching people shoot themselves in the foot again and again and aga…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 01:46 PM
5

I think the funniest part about this is that everyone who's happy about Men's Rights Activists being bashed don't seem to realise that what they're seeing portrayed isn't actual Men's Rights Activism, it's "what it would look like if MRAs acted the way feminists act". Look at some of the ridiculous shit they're complaining about. Look at the signs they're holding. This is a parody of feminism that Poehler's calling ridiculous, not men's rights. All of the feminists cheering about this should pro…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 01:34 PM
151

while the government tries to put the interests of the kids first.... ....tell that to the kid that got raped.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:59 PM
16

The problem with this process, as evidenced by the whole GamerGate thing, is that the people who decide what counts as a "reputable source" are people personally attached to the issue and who are biased to their point of view. You can have all the sources you want that you think are reputable, but unless the Wikipedia editors agree, it won't matter, and they'll just keep on citing Jezebel as reputable. The problem isn't that reputable sources don't exist, the problem is that the people deciding …
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:30 PM
15

Not with that attitude!
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:22 PM
1

Ah! TIL.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 08:37 PM
2

I do have one question why in this one case is a minor child able to have a medical procedure without parental notification, but no other medical procedure? I might be misunderstanding the scenario you're talking about here, but in the article the person having the medical procedure isn't necessarily a minor. It's the pregnant mother wishing to have an abortion. This proposed change would require her to have the permission of the father of that unborn child in order to have an abortion. The prob…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:01 PM
8

I whole-heartedly disagree. This is a step completely in the wrong direction. A woman shouldn't need to get anyone's permission to have an abortion. It's her body, and she has full control over what she wants to do with it. Having a baby or not is 100% the woman's choice. But if a man does not wish to be a father, he should also 100% have a choice. What would be a better step is to allow the father to opt out of parental responsibilities within the period during which an abortion is possible (or…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:41 PM
9

"using Police assault rates as a measure of the prevalence of domestic violence is wrong" because "many women choose never to report to police". Funny how it's fine to use those statistics to say it's not a problem for men, though, without taking the same problem into account.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 05:06 PM
1

Yeah...
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:13 PM
82

I'm sure this is some kind of misogyny. /s
/r/MensRights28/12/14 01:08 PM
-1

Those detectives really don't know anything about 'Listening and Believing', do they?!
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/14 07:02 PM
12

he shouldn't have stood up and started pushing her. You're right. He should have punched her in the face while she was in the middle of attacking him.
/r/PussyPass20/12/14 02:45 PM
15

then she sees the ducks and just veers head-first into the oncoming (east bound) lane? No, the east and west-bound lanes are separated where she stopped. She stopped in the left lane of a two-lane westbound highway. was she just stopped in the middle of the road? Yes, she stopped her car in the middle of the highway. did this happen at night? was it foggy out? No. The man and daughter on the motorcycle were behind a car. The car didn't notice that there was a car stopped on the highway and swerv…
/r/PussyPass19/12/14 12:24 PM
47

Come on, now... you know that to a white knight touching the instigator without consent would be rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 10:36 PM
121

Wonder what would happen if I said the women who do this need to get a job and quit playing the system?
/r/MensRights25/11/14 08:55 PM
15

It doesn't even need to be prostitution - that's easily still rape. "Your honor, he told me he was rich and he wasn't, so that's rape." "Objection! She told me it didn't matter to her whether or not I was rich but it did, so that's rape!"
/r/MensRights25/11/14 01:39 AM
55

@2:13 "he crossed over, and that bumper hit right here".... I can't for the life of me understand how you can point to the back of someone's vehicle and say "that's the part of his car that ran into the front of mine, officer" without immediately realizing what a piece of shit you are.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/14 03:12 PM
2

Interesting to think that the man complaining to management that there aren't changing facilities in the men's room probably wouldn't get much done, but a woman complaining that a man was in the women's room would probably get shit changed right quick.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:01 PM
2

So, you think that your example is the only possible way that notion can be perpetuated? Are you seriously trying to imply that women don't also perpetuate this stereotype?
/r/MensRights04/10/14 05:14 PM
6

First thing I thought of, too.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:09 PM
1

Wow. That was way more than my recommended daily intake of sodium.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 01:53 AM
11

You're such a victim-blaming shitlord.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:26 PM
5

Funny how this response didn't get addressed at all, huh?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:39 PM
11

I know, right?!
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:38 PM
3

Poor guy.. She sounds like a horribly manipulative person who figures the ideology of feminism is the best way to beat a man into submission.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:22 AM
3

FEMINISM: fighting diligently for every woman's right to do exactly as feminism says.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:12 PM
2

Also this.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:32 AM
28

Oh, there's another reason...
/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:29 AM
4

I'm not saying "don't cripple him", so much as I'm saying, "also make sure to slap him".
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:41 PM
3

Hey, hey, hey, hey.... It's about equality, here. You should totally slap the white knight too before you cripple him.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:29 PM
9

I'd argue that the latter is.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:26 AM
13

does that mean that the men's rights movement should sit around and complain about feminists or should it continue to hold conferences about men's rights anyway? You do know that you can do both of those things, right? They're not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:05 AM
29

you probably shouldn't spend your time pointing fingers at feminists and yelling about how dumb they are and actually, y'know, focus on men's issues. That's hard to do, because most of the places you can hold conferences have fire alarm systems.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:43 AM
1

You see, many feminists don't like movements which support equality, because largely they oppose any definition of "equality" that isn't "equality when it suits us". As a result, any terrible-looking snippet of anything said by anyone who disagrees them typically gets taken out of context to paint these people in the worst light, because it's easier to point at that and say "LOOK!! MUHSOGYNY!!" than it is to argue against these points, because typically they would be arguing against the equality…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:37 PM
1

Personally, I'm not angry about the existence of feminism, and I don't know anybody who's angry about the existence of feminism. I'm angry about the existence of people who say they're feminists but who only care about "equality" when it benefits women, though. I liken it to Muslims. I'm not angry about the existence of Muslims, I'm angry about the existence of Muslims who use bullshit logic to justify killing people.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:13 PM
1

Indeed!
/r/PussyPass18/07/14 06:37 AM
7

What should I do? Does your son want to be circumcised? If not, simply tell your son to refuse, and stand behind your son's decision. Your wife will freak out, but as the one trying to force someone to cut parts off of your son that he doesn't want cut off, she's in the wrong, here, so who gives a shit what she thinks? Talk to the doctor's office and make sure they're aware that you're cancelling your appointment because your son does not want the procedure. Ask them why they're willing to perfo…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:54 PM
1

Seriously, though. We should do that.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:25 AM
2

On closer inspection, you're right. The part I was misinterpreting was: (c) penetration of a person’s anus or vagina with a part of B’s body or by B with anything else Which I apparently read backwards to mean that B was the one being penetrated. I'll amend the post I made earlier.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 03:33 PM
3

(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section, if the activity caused involved— (a) penetration of B’s anus or vagina, (b) penetration of B’s mouth with a person’s penis, (c) penetration of a person’s anus or vagina with a part of B’s body or by B with anything else, or (d) penetration of a person’s mouth with B’s penis, is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life. (5) Unless subsection (4) applies, a person guilty of an offence under this section is liable— (a) on su…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:51 PM
3

Surely there have been cases where women were charged for sexual assault/harassment? Rape is specifically defined in the UK as penetration by a penis, and therefore women cannot commit rape - women can only commit sexual assault. Rape carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, whereas sexual assault carries a maximum sentence of 10 years. If a man ties a woman to a bed and has non-consensual sex with her, he goes to jail for life. If a woman ties a man to a bed and has non-consensual sex w…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:17 AM
2

kek
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:52 PM
3

I'm going to reiterate it. Don't sign anything that says you sexually assaulted someone. Get a lawyer, and tell your lawyer that you'd happily sign it if the part that says "I agree with the statement that I sexually assaulted her" is removed. Your lawyer and hers can discuss the details, but you definitely need someone looking out for your best interest.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 04:24 PM
35

Did I.... did I just agree with Perez Hilton?
/r/PussyPass28/06/14 05:35 AM
2

While talking about domestic violence, she made the claim that females hitting males was less serious because they don't cause injury as often, etc, etc.. My response was: "Oh, so a male doing it makes it "legitimate violence"?" I used the finger quotes. She understood exactly what I meant, and tried to change the subject.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:22 PM
6

Damn.. Maybe that's why they get their panties in a bunch when people argue against male circumcision - eventually they plan to have the whole thing cut off for censorship purposes.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:50 PM
7

if you're over 18 you're old enough and mature enough not to freak out at pictures of fucking genitals. And if you're not, you're not going to go to Wikipedia to jerk it to pictures like that. And if you're going to such an extreme as to want to remove it from Wikipedia, I suppose the next step is censoring sex ed classes?
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:43 PM
8

As it stands, women are more likely to be violent... but tell that to the average feminist (as I have) and they will start pulling stats about hospital visits or "serious" injury in order to cast men in a worse light. I've had a feminist make that argument before. She didn't have a comeback after I compared what she said to Todd Akin's "legitimate rape" comment.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:09 PM
1

Checkmate, feminists.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 08:59 PM
10

Silly MRA.. women can't harm people.. /s
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:13 PM
8

Shocking.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:05 PM
1

Again, subjective. What does "thin" mean to you? How much symmetry is required for your definition of "symmetrical"? Why is "long hair" a requirement? How much of an "hourglass shape" do you have to be to fit your description? I'm positive that my answers to these questions will be different from yours, and that both of our answers will be different from just about anyone else's.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:41 PM
8

Arguing about "financial abortions" and child support "accountability" puts men's wants above the needs of a child. Does it? Seems to me that a woman choosing to have a child she can't support without having to rely financially on someone else is putting her desires above the child's welfare too.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:28 PM
1

Yes it is.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:11 PM
3

That's pretty much what I thought you meant, and I whole-heartedly agree with you on that! And thank you for a great post to begin with! :)
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:03 PM
4

Does anyone else hate that we can't all just be people, judged individually, without regard to our bodies? Holy fuck, do I ever. At the end of the day, I'm essentially an egalitarian, it's just that while feminism has been a tremendous force for good in the past, what it is today, in my opinion and in general, is not "also helping men" as they claim. That's why I hang around here - to speak out for my gender because there's already a group out there who speaks out for the other one. Feminism isn…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:49 AM
3

..and boy, are my arms tired!
/r/MensRights15/06/14 03:47 PM
2

This whole thread makes me fucking ashamed, you know that? Here's a guy that is having trouble dealing with a woman who assaulted and threatened to falsely accuse him, and half the posts here are making fun of the guy? That's the kind of shit that belongs on /r/SRSsucks guys. Not here. I know the guy clearly doesn't agree with our views, but that doesn't change the fact that he's a human being who could use some help with his issue. Making fun of him for his views in this sub when we should be h…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:17 PM
11

I checked it out a while back. It's.... not for me.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:08 PM
9

what I inferred was we are not them We aren't them, though. And they're not us, either. Any group has positive and negative qualities, and lumping in one group with another creates problems. To be clear: Group 1 has positive quality A and negative quality X. Group 2 has positive quality B and negative quality Y. Group 3 has positive quality C and negative quality Z. When you lump them all together and talk about the three distinct groups as if they're one, people will assume that Group 1 has neg…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:03 PM
16

Don't be so quick to throw people under the bus. To be fair, he didn't talk any trash about those groups. You're the one that made that assumption. He's not wrong to state that "a lot of articles lump us in with PUAs, PUAHate and /r/redpill", and the truth is that general perception of those things are negative. The fact of the matter is that the MRA isn't about any of those things, and those things aren't about men's rights. He stated fact without saying anything negative about those groups. Se…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:35 PM
1

And aside from "the police were coming to arrest him", because in fairness, the woman was the one who called the police, these are all very valid points. The problem I have isn't with any of those points, but with the fact that an 8-day-old account came in here to post this video with no specific topic of discussion presented, and threads like that turn into nothing but chaotic torch-and-pitchfork circlejerks. We're not SRS, and frankly, I just don't want this sub to turn into that kind of garba…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:56 PM
2

This isn't the place for this kind of shit.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:23 PM
0

So based on that presumption, we should all light our torches and grab our pitchforks like the SRS would? She deserved to be arrested, and she was. "Defending her" and "arguing that an 8-day-old account posting something like this here without bringing up a specific, focused topic of discussion will lead to dumbass comments and to outsiders thinking we're no different than SRS" are two completely different things. Yes, there are valid points of discussion which could be brought up here, but if s…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:36 PM
0

I'm not defending what she did. I'm glad she was arrested for assaulting that kid. If you'd bother to read what I've written in these posts, my concern is this place becoming an SRS-style circlejerk, not the welfare of the asshole who attacked a kid. But I mean, if you'd like this place to turn into SRS, then by all means, keep running your mouth.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:28 PM
1

It's made clear by all the times she mentioned the evil patriarchy in the video, right? That never happens to men who are filming men - they don't ever get attacked over the fact that people don't like being filmed, it's only ever because of the evil patriarchy and because women fear for their vaginal security. You'd better go tell those guys over at /r/amifreetogo that those cops getting pissed about people filming them are really just fighting patriarchy.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:55 PM
-5

And you keep saying "got arrested" like that's the end of the story. Do you think that she will face the same repercussions that a man would have? It's highly likely that she'll get little to no punishment. Thus, we are at the heart of the Men's Rights movement. Then there should be some kind of indication that this is the topic this post is intended to discuss. Otherwise you get comments like this that everyone outside of this sub is going to latch on to and say "LOOK AT DA EVIL MENZ!!!11!!!". …
/r/MensRights08/06/14 05:38 PM
-7

By "if the genders were reversed", you mean if he'd been the one calling the cops on her? I mean, she called the cops. The cops arriving on the scene tend to assume that the one who called the cops is the one in need of assistance, so it makes sense that they approach the situation assuming that he's the bad guy. And at the end of the day, she got arrested. So to reverse the genders, he calls the cops on her, and then assaults her. Chances are, he's going to be arrested too. You can say that the…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 05:25 PM
-2

I guess. I mean, she's the one who called the police, so it would make sense that the cops showing up would initially approach the situation assuming the guilty party is not the one who called the police. And then she got arrested. I get it.. I just.. people come into this place assuming all we care about is the right to rape women and keep them in the kitchen, and a post like this doesn't really do much but start a circlejerk of "yeah, I'd have loved to have punched that cunt in her woman-face"…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 05:18 PM
-37

Sorry, but what does this have to do with men's rights? She assaulted someone and was arrested for it.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:54 PM
1

Is this bad? Uh.. yeah. Yeah, it is. Well, I mean, kind of. If you manage to find a woman who is interested in hanging around you when you want her to, who looks good, who is willing and able to bear children, and chooses to do all of this in exchange for money, then really, the two of you can do what you want, I suppose. Unless that's actually illegal. I'm not really sure. But the way you're saying it kind of makes it seem as if you just want a 'pet woman' or something. I mean, if you find some…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:17 AM
1

Yes, because it's definitely a choice exclusively between those two options alone. You're absolutely right, there exists absolutely zero middle ground between either just accepting someone walking around indecently in your store and calling the police and having them hauled away in cuffs. /s (I added the "/s" in case you thought someone was actually agreeing with you, here)
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:40 PM
2

She'll bring it up with her parents when she complains to them that she got kicked out of the store for being indecently dressed. And if she doesn't, then it's not your problem. Her parents clearly either don't give a shit how their daughter is dressed when she leaves the house, or don't care enough to know. And it's a lot less black-and-white than "either I call her parents or she goes to jail". You can kick her out of your store without calling the police. If she doesn't want to leave and thro…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 11:56 AM
4

You're in the wrong because your response was inappropriate. If someone's walking around your store and you feel they're inappropriately dressed, you tell them and you kick them out of your store. You don't call their parents and lecture them about how they should raise their kids. You're right that someone inappropriately dressed is also in the wrong, but your response wasn't appropriate.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 11:23 AM
3

Baby steps, though. Baby steps.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:32 PM
5

You kind of have to. They're only feminists.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:09 PM
3

Because when they were called-out on it they didn't file a sexual harassment complaint.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:03 PM
6

I disagree. I feel like this was a good encounter with the decent kind of open-minded feminist. Mostly because if it were the batshitcrazy kind that you mention, they would welcome the immediate involvement of HR because clearly those words he used raped them right in their vaginas.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 12:16 PM
1

I think mine's broken. It said I was raped when realistically I was asking for it.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 03:02 AM
1

That's an interesting question. It's my understanding (and I may be way off) that the court decides whether or not a minor is tried as an adult based on whether or not it is believed that the minor charged was fully aware of the impact and consequences of their actions and have prior criminal activity on file. I wonder, then, whether more minor males get picked up by police than females, and thus more often have prior criminal activity on record? There probably isn't much in the way of statistic…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:47 PM
11

/r/pussypass
/r/MensRights13/03/14 10:21 PM
3

It would definitely be nice to compile a list. The only one that springs to mind that has a real 'bumbling idiot' female character was Friends, in which all the characters on both sides of the gender divide had their fair share of problems as characters. I think Friends did it right.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 04:32 PM
6

I'm shocked.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 10:50 PM
1

Yeah. That's definitely great and clear-cut. That last sentence is also well-written.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:22 PM
1

Yeah, if that's the case then I completely agree. It's my definition of what constitutes a 'risk' that was broader than what they consider it to be.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:18 PM
3

So for the sake of argument, let's say that I poke a hole in the condom, but that I'm sterile. Is that still sexual assault? What I'm taking from it is that the act becomes non-consentual once one of the people changes the terms of the consent by poking holes in condoms, thus increasing the risks involved. Maybe I'm missing it, but I don't see anything in there that suggests that if she hadn't gotten pregnant, it wouldn't still be sexual assault. So why would it be any different for HIV whether …
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:05 PM
2

Right, but isn't risk of HIV something which would make it sexual assault if it were a woman doing this to a man? I don't think any of them are saying that isn't the case. I'll re-read it, maybe I'm just not seeing it in the same context, it just seems like pregnancy isn't the only reason, but in this case it is at least part of the reason, so they're mentioning it also, you know?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:30 PM
8

The problem with this decision, is that sabotaging birth control is only sexual assault if the 'victim' is a woman. A man who is 'defrauded' in a similar situation would not face the same "risk of bodily harm". There is no discussion of this discrepancy in the judgement. I'm not sure about that. I mean, this specific case they're talking about is in regards to a woman getting pregnant, so using pregnancy as the example in their statements seems natural. A woman poking holes in a condom significa…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:00 PM
1

It's as if they want to be raped.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 04:38 PM
4

After reading his post, I intended on replying almost exactly this. Fight on, /u/Everything_is_rape, wherever you are.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:24 PM
33

They don't go out of their way to get just men. But they pay people to be the test subjects, making it something that's a more attractive prospect for a homeless person. And when was the last time you saw a homeless woman? For every one I've seen, I've seen a hundred homeless men.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 03:28 PM
1

Of course he would be ok with that! After all, it's worth it if it makes the world a safer place.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 04:27 PM
1

Because you just raped me, and I'm calling the police and you're going to jail now.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 04:26 PM
72

Feminists only looking at the datapoints which support their theory and disregarding any other facts? No.......
/r/MensRights11/02/14 01:52 PM
5

You remember all those laws those people fought for that prevent a rape victim's previous sexual history from being used as evidence in a case because "previous sexual history" has should have no bearing on the current case? Funny how it's ok to just assume guilt, here.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 06:18 PM
18

I'm sorry to hear that. I hope that you're well and that you've been able to put it behind you as much as possible. And you and I are definitely on the same page - being a shitty person crosses all gender boundaries.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:40 PM
28

You're the best kind of person.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:12 PM
23

Because equality means equal privileges, not equal consequences, shitlord!!
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:37 PM
7

Number Five FTFY.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:52 PM
12

Wow, by these standards, with the genders reversed I've been physically or sexually abused a lot throughout my life.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:13 PM
2

A nun is someone who chooses not merely to join a religion but to devote her entire life to it. Ah. So your argument is that these other women aren't making a choice, then?
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:02 AM
2

I'll just ask them if a nun is being oppressed for wearing the clothing she wears. That's pretty much the perfect response, I'd say.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 04:34 PM
19

OP, please please do this.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 04:27 PM
1

M... Morley?
/r/MensRights08/01/14 02:47 PM
0

Maybe they need urinals.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 02:46 PM
1

Have you seen women's bathrooms? They are consistently more messy. Maybe they need urinals.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 02:45 PM
34

But what if I'm the one drunk? Then you were raped. And she was raped. Everyone's raped!
/r/MensRights07/01/14 04:42 PM
4

I commented this on the article. It's awaiting moderation. Any bets as to whether it passes moderation? This has to be the most idiotic thing I've read all week. Your argument boils down to the fact that children are, 100% of the time, in better care if they're in their mother's custody, and that the first priority of a father should be the support of the mother rather than the well-being of their child. That's just misandry. Plain and simple. Women can be bad parents just as much as men can, or…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 09:40 PM
24

I've been awake all of 7 minutes, and I'm positive this is the funniest thing I'll have read all day.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:05 AM
19

Check your math privilege, shitlord!
/r/MensRights15/12/13 04:17 AM
22

Yeah.. I love how when the skilled and experienced business mogul tries to correct her inaccurate math and tries to keep it simple, she gets all, "well we are women," as if to imply that he's patronizing her because of her gender rather than because she clearly has no idea how to math. Always the victims.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 04:12 AM
6

I whole-heartedly agree with that. Even though she wasn't making any money, she was definitely putting in a lot of work at home, and I appreciated every bit of it. It was most definitely a mutual thing with she and I. The reason I brought it up was more in regards to the perception we both had of the situation - neither of us felt that we had a gender role, we both just had roles. With regard to the article, a male filling the role she had isn't looked upon as being a worthwhile endeavour for a …
/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:52 AM
14

I remember when I used to date a feminist. She stayed home during the day making meals, mending clothes, doing housework, running errands, etc. She was very happy and appreciative of the fact that my work allowed her to stay at home and do what she did, especially during the summer months when her children were at home. She always hated the feminists who would say that her choosing that kind of life was somehow holding them back by reinforcing gender roles, but to her it wasn't a gender role, it…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 01:58 AM
7

All y'all only look at the data that supports your already-existing worldview. You mean exactly like you're doing right now?
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:08 PM
63

It also doesn't mean they don't judge the guy anyway.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:01 PM
11

Double standards don't real, shitlord!
/r/MensRights10/12/13 11:59 AM
5

The way I see it, it's a nice thing to do, and most people appreciate it. If they don't, great, I'm glad I ruined their day. You think like I think.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:08 PM
2

Shocking.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:50 PM
0

It was a joke. Like the original article.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:15 AM
1

It's admittedly an extreme exaggeration. Maybe I should have put that we get called "creepy" when it's completely unwarranted. I was going for the humour value of everything being considered 'rape' nowadays.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:40 PM
11

Why Men Don't Do Those 10 Old Fashioned Things Anymore by eDgEIN708 1. Coming to the door to pick someone up. We thought you wanted to be treated as equals. I'm not about to go up to my buddy's door when I'm picking him up to go to the hockey game, I expect him to be ready because he's a grown adult who knows when I'm picking him up. 2. Trying to dress really nicely for a date. I'm sorry, I thought what a person was wearing wasn't supposed to make a difference? 3. Bringing flowers or other token…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 02:05 PM
1

Do you really not know the history of your own damned movement? It started in the 70s, literally and factually, as a reactionary movement against Feminism. And yours used to be about equality. Things change.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:48 AM
1

Sounds like someone I know..
/r/MensRights18/11/13 04:21 AM
2

I don't have enough upvotes. I'm happy to hear that things worked out for at least one of her children.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 12:49 PM
0

This article is the best article.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 01:54 PM
2

From what I gather, your entire argument is completely thrown out the window when someone mentions the fact that adoption exists. So what about adoption?
/r/MensRights09/11/13 10:45 PM
7

I was going to respond to your statement, but you've missed the point so much that I don't want to have to explain it all. I'll just say that the real point is that the responsibility wouldn't exist to run away from if the woman didn't choose for it to exist.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 10:40 PM
2

That's an insanely sexist attitude.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 12:57 PM
1

I know. And I agree. That's why I said IF the goal was equality.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 10:54 AM
8

but I don't think the two groups are really contrary to one another. Too few people seem to really understand that. If the goal really is equality, the groups would never have anything to argue about. Ever.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 07:34 PM
24

One of the issues I think affects this perception the post is the fact that feminism has done quite a lot of good for women, but has also led to overcompensation in many areas, or else disregard for equality when it doesn't suit them. As a result, many of the issues MRA's discuss can very easily be portratyed as something that is meant to negatively affect women. For example, something like 97% of workplace injuries and deaths involve male victims. When you try to speak out about it, a lot of ti…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 07:18 PM
4

This is the funniest thing I've seen all day. Thank you for this.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 01:43 AM
1

It's shocking.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 01:36 PM
12

/r/egalitarianism and /r/equality both are decent, though certainly not as active as this one and /r/feminism are. You might also like /r/FeMRAdebates if you're interested in having decent discussions. The people there who lean to one side or the other are often (not always, but often) willing to at least consider and debate the opposing viewpoint rather than just plain yell "MISOGYNY!", and block their ears and yell "LA-LA-LA-LA-LA-CAN'T-HEAR-YOU!"
/r/MensRights26/10/13 08:42 PM
0

For most other issues, I'd agree with you. On the specific topic of misandric Facebook pages, I disagree. Facebook has policies in place against the creation of hateful pages based on, among other things, gender. It's their website, and their rules. You're absolutely right that no one should censor people, and from that standpoint I agree with you, but from the standpoint of the site being their property, on their website they're well within their rights to do so. Misogynistic pages are routinel…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 11:11 PM
3

Someone recently told me this subreddit is one of the most open and anti-censorship subs on here. That is clearly false. Tell you what, you go make the same comments on a post over in a feminist subreddit and see how long it takes for you to get banned. Come on back here afterward and keep sharing your opinion, because you're welcome to over here. That doesn't mean we have to agree with it. I understand your point. You believe that censorship in any form is wrong. Where I disagree is the fact th…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 06:06 PM
18

I wonder if he "consented" to the blowjob, or if she just went ahead and did it and he just didn't say no. If it's the latter, then by the girl's own logic she's just as guilty of rape as he is.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:03 PM
2

I had almost this exact experience in high school. We had a teacher who was very clearly a misandric feminist. Boys in her class consistently got lower grades, and judging from the way the boys talked about it, it was because their drive to do well was trampled on by the fact that when a boy brought anything up in class the idea was ridiculed, and when a girl opened her mouth it was the song of angels. I nearly got her fired. Here's how. There are good teachers out there. Find a couple of them. …
/r/MensRights05/10/13 05:31 PM
11

It's easy to decry MRAs as misogynists, but another thing altogether to recognise that women are leaving themselves out in the cold by allowing upstanding men to be alienated by these kind of acts. Yeah. I mean, I don't plan on ever marrying again. It has absolutely nothing to do with hating women, and everything to do with the fact that marriage just isn't a fair deal for men. In principle, it should be, but in practice it clearly isn't, so why should I willingly become part of something that p…
/r/MensRights04/10/13 01:03 PM
57

Remember, boys and girls, patriarchy hurts men just as much as it hurts women. /s
/r/MensRights04/10/13 12:53 PM
3

It's funny because of how sad those sad people are and I get to laugh at them being sad.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 02:24 PM
12

Clearly it's because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 02:13 PM
1

Counter-rallying a "Men & Boys In Crisis" rally with a pamphlet that talks about misogyny. Someone hasn't been taking her pills. (I mean, in her defence, though, she probably hasn't been taking them because patriarchy.)
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:24 PM
1

We're just friends, I swear!
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:23 PM
1

Aw! Thanks, bot!
/r/MensRights24/09/13 08:52 AM
2

Aw man! You missed the italicized word! I'm sorry. You're still the best though, eDgEIN708!
/r/MensRights24/09/13 08:51 AM
2

Thanks, Reads_Small_Text_Bot! No, thank you eDgEIN708, you are the best!
/r/MensRights24/09/13 08:48 AM
2

I think if women are pushed into games we may see a lot of generic crap titles that'll drive customers away. Also, to address this point, video games have traditionally been marketed to their target audience, which was in the past significantly male. People often can better identify with characters they share a gender with, resulting in many titles which feature male leads. As these trends are changing, more and more games are changing with them. Most modern RPGs or other kind of game which allo…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 08:38 AM
2

Also i've not followed Metroid for years but do the games actually refer to her as a woman or genderless? The original Metroid for the NES included the then-standard instruction manual, which also detailed the game's story. In the instruction manual, all references to Samus used a masculine pronoun. Only once the game was completed did Samus remove her helmet and reveal herself to the player as a woman. This was lauded as innovative, with GameTrailers remarking that this "blew the norm of women …
/r/MensRights24/09/13 08:17 AM
45

A friend of mine was accused of sexual assault because a girl sat in his lap at the pub and he got an erection. Her rationale was that sitting on his lap was a friendly, innocent act, and that his resulting erection poking her was him committing sexual assault. She was ready to call the cops. Thankfully the people at the bar talked some sense into her.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:56 AM
6

It's as if you always beat me to the good responses.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 08:37 PM
5

It's like there isn't anything you understand.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 06:24 PM
3

You are trying to reason with someone who is an unreasonable, sexist hypocrite who thinks that different laws should apply to men and women after the child is born as well as their doublethink views on abortion. Well said.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:50 PM
3

Yes totally reasonable to expect a mother to kill her unborn child or give it away because the father just didn't give a fuck about caring for his child. Yeah, I'm done debating this with you. If you can't acknowledge that the mother doesn't give a fuck about caring for her child either if she chooses to have and raise it in a situation of poverty, you clearly have no sense of logic.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:49 PM
4

So you're ok with the expectation that they choose to bring a child to term who will live in poverty, and you feel that the responsibility for this choice (and the choice not to give it up for adoption) should fall squarely on the man who had no part in either decision? How does that make any sense? Your whole point revolves around how disgusted you are at the notion that a man should be able to "walk away" and leave a child in poverty, but the fact of the matter is that the woman is the one who…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:05 PM
3

If a woman has an abortion there is no kid to suffer from a parent not wanting to pay for it, it no longer exists. This quote is from a previous post you wrote. You seem not to have a problem with abortions. You seem to feel that a woman choosing to have an abortion is perfectly acceptable. So my question is, if you are ok with abortion, in a situation where a woman is unable to provide for a baby on her own, and the man doesn't want to be a father, how do you rationalize a child growing up in p…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:44 PM
3

If a woman has an abortion there is no kid to suffer from a parent not wanting to pay for it, it no longer exists. This quote is from a previous post you wrote. You seem not to have a problem with abortions. You seem to feel that a woman choosing to have an abortion is perfectly acceptable. So my question is, if you are ok with abortion, in a situation where a woman is unable to provide for a baby on her own, and the man doesn't want to be a father, how do you rationalize a child growing up in p…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:43 PM
3

I cannot stomach forcing a child to grow up in poverty because one parent just didn't give a fuck and said not my responsibility when he got someone pregnant. Why does the male get the blame for the female's decision? If a woman gets pregnant knowing that the man doesn't want to be a father, and can't afford to raise a child on her own, where's HER part of the blame for making the choice to bring the child to term? She could've done something about it, but didn't. She could have prevented the tr…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:17 PM
5

Then the woman should have thought twice about whether or not to abort if she's going to choose to bring the child into a shitty situation.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:09 PM
1

Yeah, I wasn't really going for realism. But frankly, either scenario is frightening. ;)
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:20 PM
2

Are you guys trying to get reflected glory because of a group you are in? Because feminists never do this ever? The issue is solidarity. Men have to look out for men because the feminists sure aren't going to. The fact of the matter is that a large issue men face in society is that we are very often treated as disposable objects, and this article does a good job pointing out that most of the dirty jobs that are primarily occupied by men are necessary for the proper functioning of today's society…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 04:02 PM
3

While there are statements I disagree with in this article, I do find it funny how often I hear "73% of CEOs are male and that's outrageous because patriarchy", but the cries of "93.4% of garbage collectors are men and that's outrageous because patriarchy" are nowhere to be heard.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:46 PM
2

I agree with everything you say in principle. But as a guy, I can't imagine how hard it would be even to just mentally prepare for "okay, in a few months this huge baby's going to destroy your vag". I really, really agree with your point of view, and I don't feel that it's worded well at all when it insinuates that women are the ones who create, but I do think childbirth should count for something. Not for custody battles and things like that, but having an "innate ability to emotionally sympath…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:20 PM
2

Yeah, everyone's tastes are different and I respect that. I'm not really trying to shit on the song itself, so much as I'm trying to convey the level of spite involved.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:12 PM
11

I don't like the song. Not because of any (completely non-existent) sexist connotations, it's just not my kind of music. It's a horrible song. After reading this article I went over to iTunes and purchased the song and video purely out of spite.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 11:48 AM
2

What would be the correct response? The correct response is: Non-Nazis have no right to judge the Nazis.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:36 AM
2

It's a shame that it isn't.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:22 PM
6

It really depends on the situation. If this were to happen in Canada, for example, I'd say that it's outrageous and sexist. If it's in a country where women aren't already treated as equals, and don't have as many rights and freedoms as they do here, and there's significant data pointing to the fact that violence against women in these situations is significantly higher than violence against men, this kind of thing would be a good stop-gap method of reducing tension and violence. It would still …
/r/MensRights10/09/13 06:02 PM
2

I guess we're essentially in agreement, then, except for the fact that I feel that any inappropriate cat-calling should be dealt with on an individual basis to avoid having to segregate the tests to begin with.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:41 PM
1

Yah, that's actually exactly what it is. Didn't know there was a name for it!
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:21 AM
2

No worries!
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:21 AM
2

I was reinforcing your statement with sarcasm. I agree with you 100%, and was making a satire of anyone who would claim that making changes like that is logical.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 11:10 PM
2

I'd be interested to hear how anyone who agrees with this can rationalize the lowering of physical standards to accommodate gender without also acknowledging other factors such as race. From Wikipedia, the average height of a U.S. citizen of Mexican descent is 5'7", while the average height of a U.S. citizen of African descent is 5'10". Tell me, should the testing be modified because of these physical differences as well? One might be able to more easily duck and weave through small obstacles be…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 10:38 PM
1

So they want the same test under exam conditions as the excersises that involve being on hands and knees, going up and down stairs and jumping about can be preformed by women without dudes looking at their wobbly bits. So what you're saying is that there if absolutely no doubt in your mind that exactly 0% of the women present in any way were looking at the strong, athletic men who were performing the test? There's no chance that any of the women present were looking at any of the men on that cou…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 10:34 PM
1

And I'd be willing to put money on the fact that if you ever brought it up, you'd be called sexist for picking on women.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 09:49 PM
3

You clearly don't understand. If you're fighting a fire and you pass out next to your female co-worker who didn't have to pass the same tests, and you die because she can't get you out, that's okay because you're a man, and there are plenty more where you came from. If the woman next to you passes out, you can save her because your tests were more difficult specifically to make sure that you can drag your irreplaceable female co-worker out of the burning building. I don't understand how you can'…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 09:46 PM
6

Not quite. By the time you get to the point where you're running 20m in 5.4 seconds, you'll have run the 20m a total of 94 times already. The test has different levels. You start at level 1, which is going the 20m a total of 7 times with 9 seconds to do it. Then (without a rest period) you go to level 2, which is going the 20m a total of 8 times with 8 seconds in which to do it. So by the time you get to the point where you're running that 20m in 5.4 seconds, you've already done all the previous…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 06:25 PM
12

A beep test is where you mark two lines 20m apart, and you have to make it from one to the other before a beep, while the series of beeps gets shorter and shorter. A lot of people end up doing this in phys ed at some point. There's a Wikipedia article.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:30 PM
13

No, this is a woman doing something to a man. In most states, 'rape' is defined as 'unwanted penetration'. This is "Sexual Assault Culture".
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:27 PM
0

This is the best comment in the history of the internet.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:14 PM
84

“When they got married, the expectation was they would start a family,” he told me. “Now she might not have the chance much longer.” When my wife and I got married, the expectation was that she would give me blowjobs for the rest of my life. Now that we're divorced, how am I supposed to get blowjobs? Better call Saul..
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:10 PM
19

I understand the idea that they feel voiceless; Read the opening paragraph of the Wikipedia article about the Men's Rights Movement and come back here and tell me how voiceless they are.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 02:42 PM
11

"Today in the English version of Wikipedia, if you type feminism and technology it says 'no page exists'," Balsamo, who is affiliated with the program, told Women’s eNews. I just typed in "men's rights and technology". Guess what the result was?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 02:39 PM
1

You can even take that one step further. World War 1 is ending, Europe and much of the world is in complete turmoil, and the most important problem women face on Earth? "We want to vote, waaah, waaah." Heh.. I find it funny how people can assume that because a person cares about a cause, that person can't also care about others as well. Some people are so closed-minded it's sad. I'm looking at you, /u/Perpetual_dissident.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 11:00 AM
5

I don't have sources, but I've seen some floating around - in a lot of states "rape" is defined as unwanted penetration. Since the woman isn't penetrating the man, it's not rape, but rather sexual assault.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 10:33 AM
12

I had a girlfriend who wanted nothing more in life than to be a stay-at-home mom, and focus on raising her kids and keeping a nice house and garden. One day we went out to support some feminist cause (I don't remember what it was specifically) and a friend of a friend was there. My girlfriend was instantly berated because this woman knew that she was a stay-at-home mom, and how dare you claim to support feminist causes when your life goal is to stay at home and perpetuate a stereotype, etc. I ju…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:10 PM
1

Welcome, and thanks for the support!
/r/MensRights04/09/13 12:29 PM
2

Which is why people are against this quota. I'm against this quota. It's sexist. It seems we misunderstood each other. EDIT: I think I see why my initial statement was misunderstood, as it was poorly stated. By saying that "this policy makes the assumption that women are incapable of achieving this without government intervention" I wasn't trying to defend the policy, but rather to point out that in addition to being discriminatory against men, it also paints women as incapable of being equal wi…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 04:34 PM
2

Of those qualified to sit at the director level, less than 40% of them are women. If that statement were true, then why would you need to make sure 40% of directors are women? Shouldn't the percentage of female directors be irrelevant, and the most qualified and best applicants be given the position regardless of gender? If 10% of the people who apply and are qualified are female, forcing 40% of the positions to be filled by females is discriminatory. As a matter of fact, the percentage of women…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:44 PM
4

This policy makes the assumption that women are incapable of achieving this without government intervention, and is sexist. Both against the men who would try for this position and not get it because of their gender, and against the women who it degrades by insulting their capabilities.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:51 PM
14

That's rough. Luckily for me when my ex hit herself and threatened to call the police I was able to talk some sense into her. It's ridiculous how few resources there are for men in these circumstances. Hooray for equality. :/
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:48 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:29 PM
-3

Though, the general feminist agenda is vitriolic toward men. Thank you. Yeah. It's a shame that the goal of equality interferes so much with the goal of feminism. Otherwise we might get along. EDIT: You know, that's not fair. There are indeed good feminists out there who would actually be happy with real equality, and I wouldn't want to lump them in with you. So I'll restate that: It's a shame that the goal of equality interferes so much with what you believe is the goal of feminism.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 08:55 AM
7

Both of the children involved are innocent. The woman is a filthy rapist who deserves neither the child nor the child support. Forcing the underage rape victim to pay child support is absolutely insane, and so are you.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 08:22 AM
16

All you're focused on is fucking over the mother rapist FTFY.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 08:12 AM
14

Ain't free speech wonderful! It's a hell of a lot more freedom of speech than most of us get on many feminist subreddits. At least we're doing it because you're a troll and not because you have an opinion that's different from ours.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 08:11 AM
4

It's a shame you're in this situation, but the fact of the matter is that she might just not want to go through a pregnancy from a physical standpoint. It isn't your body, so it isn't your decision, you know? It definitely really sucks, though. I feel for you, man.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 04:25 AM
7

Heads I win, tails you lose.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 09:57 PM
1

Me too. The comment disappeared. I didn't think there was anything wrong with it. :/
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:52 PM
9

You mean you missed season 1 of America's Next Top Judge? Man, it was fantastic. If you thought Simon Cowell was an asshole, you haven't seen Judy.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 05:11 PM
6

Dude, I think you missed out on a better point than that... Other feminists are already pondering the implications of sexbots for divorce. Will wives be able to sue for divorce if their husbands ‘cheat’ on them with a nubile sexbot? I don't know.. Can husbands file for divorce because their wives 'cheat' on them with a dildo?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:29 AM
1

Who said anything about holding back women? Women get raped too, and that's most definitely a problem. Is a person not allowed to also care about men being raped? I mean, honestly, is it so inconceivable that a person might see both of these things as a problem? Look at your statement there. There's no reason to hold back women who are out there making a difference about a more important problem. A more important problem? So women being raped is a more important problem than men being raped? Mos…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:22 AM
34

If this goes through, I'm gonna have a field day filing a human rights complaint against Curves. They really need some sensitivity training too.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 09:02 PM
3

Out of curiosity, how do you feel about gender-specific bathrooms?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 09:00 PM
5

If I could vote this down a thousand times I would. I can't give it more than one downvote, but I can also throw you an upvote!
/r/MensRights26/08/13 05:33 PM
1

"I expected the criticism, but I can't understand it," Lily said. "When is it going to be appropriate to show our bodies as they are, and not in some false, made-up way?" I would be willing to bet cash money that if the cover was full of dicks she'd be able to understand the criticism.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:46 PM
9

Just tell the police that this woman raped you, and ruin her life right back. The police will be at her house in a heartbeat, and it'll be all over the news and her life will be ruined. All of this will happen for sure because equality exists. On a serious note, though, there is a lot of good advice here. I hope that this blows over too, man. You have support here.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:47 PM
110

It doesn't affect boys - they're male and are thus unaffected by the problems and hardships of life. Only women have valid concerns in that regard. /s
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:23 PM
7

Uh..
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:21 PM
2

You deserve better, man. I'm sorry to hear that you're in a situation like that.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 11:16 AM
10

Because that would be sexist. Get with the program.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 11:07 AM
4

It's like you're in their heads.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:23 PM
3

It was rhetorical. A cursory search shows that with genders reversed the sentences are extreme shows a clear disparity in sentencing, even when the young women involved reply with their own pictures. Are you suggesting that we should let all those males out of jail, then, and give them community service instead?
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:49 PM
1

Really?
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:26 PM
7

It's one thing to say that, but if you were to reverse the genders of the people involved, you'd be lucky if they use so light a word as "preying".
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:20 PM
0

Seconded.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 03:35 PM
4

I like it, but as people are pointing out, everything's better with sources.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:10 PM
11

Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:18 PM
2

It makes sense in that the expenses are equal on either side. I understand that the idea is that the best interest of the child is paramount. It still doesn't make sense to me that one parent should be liable for the other one's shitty income or poor life decisions.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:46 AM
3

Don't forget this! But yeah, I think the point of the comments here was to debate the merits of the action because they think it's a protest against rape rather than a march to encourage people to support victims of rape.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:12 AM
20

I'm with the group. Go to the police and report the crime. Even if you don't want to press charges, file the report. As everyone is saying, if she gets mad at you and files a report first, the simple fact of the matter is that your trying to say she raped you after she claims you raped her is not going to go over as well as if you had reported it, and then she came in claiming rape.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:06 PM
2

Very well-played.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:48 AM
25

This woman likes to manufacture oppression. The last thing she actually wants is equality, because then she would have nothing to get up in arms about. Who is Anita Sarkeesian, Alex?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 04:59 PM
1

*gasp*! I'm starting an online petition to have this man arrested!
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:20 PM
1

The best example being women who want to be stay at home mothers and how, in general, the feminist movement has demonized these women That is true. I've been a stay-home mom for many years and I get so darn tired of hearing the work I do minimized by being described in terms of "just" or "only", and hearing that a woman can be "so much more than just a mother", as if I've set my sights too low by choosing to focus my time on raising the kids I birthed into the world. As if my kids would benefit …
/r/MensRights29/07/13 02:50 PM
2

The world needs more people who think like you.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 02:28 PM
6

I think the point of the comment was that your marital status shouldn't matter. Frankly, I'd just go in, and when they ask about your wife's signature, tell them you're not married. When they say, "but you were married last week", you tell them, "if I was looking for marriage councilling I'd have gone elsewhere, it's none of your fucking business, now cut my balls please."
/r/MensRights29/07/13 02:25 PM
5

It doesn't surprise me that this occurred on the opposite side of the world from North America.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 12:00 PM
3

No, the poster even says specifically that it's about the escapism that diversions provide, not about games in particular. The problem, to put it bluntly, is that when a female needs help everyone says, "oh you poor thing let me help you", and when a male needs help everyone says, "suck it up princess". It creates a culture where males are less likely to ask for and/or get help.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter