ePants Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" Treadmill is easier on my knees. Ok? Jogging on a treadmill is still jogging. Have a fruit cup. Fruit does go well with a little salt, so thanks.	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 08:25 PM
6	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" But you sure do care what strangers write on the internet, and even more about "being right" on reddit. The threshold of minimum emotional investment required to make a reddit comment is negligible. Sure, it's definitely a non-zero amount, but it's also definitely less than it takes to actively insult a stranger like you're doing. (Edit: It's weird though that you're portraying "caring" about something as a negative thing in the first place. I honestly don't care if or how much you care - but it…	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 03:07 PM
3	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" Even if that were true, it would still demonstrate that body heat is not directly correlated to body weight / composition.	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 03:03 PM
4	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" Jesus Christ jokes are hard huh? Chill out dude He was kidding about moving, not about keeping women warm.	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 01:36 PM
11	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" That was obviously a joke. It clearly wasn't, based on his responses. Go eat some ice cream. Go on a jog. (Not really though. I don't care how much you weigh and I don't tell strangers what to do)	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 01:35 PM
7	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" Ok? I wasn't shitting on you for being overweight - there's no reason to justify it. I was just pointing out why it was being downvoted.	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 01:33 PM
5	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" 5'11". I'm a particularly slim, warm-blooded dude. That was the entire point of mentioning that.	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 01:21 PM
6	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" My ex loved to cuddle up with me to keep her warm. So did the previous one before that. It's a part of me that they liked. Right. And I guess not being overweight makes me cold blooded? My exes would do literally the same thing for the same reason. Except I've never weighed over 150 lbs in my life, so it clearly has nothing to do with weight. (Edit: Your response does confirm that the part I was talking about wasn't a joke)	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 01:18 PM
11	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" So moving north was a joke... But not the part about keeping women warm? - The part that's actually the neckbeard trope?	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 01:04 PM
58	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" Really? You don't think it might have been this part? Bigger guys keep smaller women warm in the winter. Maybe I need to move further north. I sort of agree with the rest of what he said, but that neckbeard cliche ruins it.	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 11:55 AM
1	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands People are getting knowledge of it's flaws, but unless you study law you aren't going to have all the information on how the system works. You're contradicting yourself again. Either you need to study law to understand it, or people (who haven't studied law) understand it well enough to know its flaws. The truth is, you don't need to study law to understand the principles of "innocent until proven guilty" and "the burden of proof" - those are very simple and basic. But if people don't even under…	/r/MensRights	16/09/17 02:46 PM
5	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands And yet we still have times, many of which can be found in this very sub, where he-said-she-said cases still go the way of the accuser instead of the defendant when there is literally no evidence except her word against his. Every case is different. If you read the article, you can see that the decision was made due to her story being inconsistent. In other cases, the defendants story may be inconsistent, so the accuser's more consistent testimony is believed. You can't just act like all cases t…	/r/MensRights	16/09/17 01:28 PM
5	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands As for 'not guilty does not mean innocent', not many people particularly believe that nowadays. They're rioting in St. Louis right now because of that very fact. To the average Joe, not guilty DOES mean innocent. Technically, the underlying principle is "innocent until proven guilty" so in one sense you are right. There is, however, an important distinction (and rightly so) between being guilty versus being convicted as guilty in court. This is due to the burden of proof being on the accusor, wh…	/r/MensRights	16/09/17 01:08 PM
62	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 Worst of all he doesn't appear to have any positive concrete suggestions. He has a few negative suggestions (i.e. stop gender/race only resources), and while I might agree with those he knows damn well that's not a practical response to their pay-gap problem; especially if some of his other claims are true. You mean "earnings gap," right?	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 06:39 PM
2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy The world must be really scary to you if you're actually this insane.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 03:02 PM
6	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy What the fuck are you talking about lol, you refuse to read any evidence You haven't posted any evidence. but you still defend a convicted sex offender LOL, no. I just pointed out that he is a sex offender. How is that defending him? based on political motivations- I haven't said anything even remotely political. You're just slinging BS and hoping something sticks. me and you have such different moral standards You picked a weird time to try and claim the high ground, after making baseless claim…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 03:26 AM
7	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy 16 assaulting a 12 year old. Still not ok. Still not what happened. You can keep lying or provide a source with different information. Second of all, get off your arse and read any of the articles under his name, they all contain roughly the same content- if you cant be bothered to google search i can't be bothered to link you shit. Nah bro. Not my responsibility to disprove your false claims when you're contradicting the article I already posted. Maybe he's not a mentally diagnosed peadophile??…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 02:52 AM
3	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy First of all, if you're going to quote an article, you need to link it. As far as I can tell, you just made all that up since it contradicts the article I already posted. Secondly, your reading comprehension needs work. He didn't commit all of them at the age of 17. They took place between 2009 and 2013. The age difference was 3 years at most when he was also a minor. The Diagnostic and Statistics Manual standard for pedophilia is that the person must be at least 16 and at least 5 years older th…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 02:20 AM
6	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy There is no evidence of a conspiracy, discovery has been requested- no evidence has yet been disclosed. There are clips of their conversations in the video, buddy. There is no evidence of anything until discovery has been finished. I like how you're suddenly so concerned with having court-processed evidence to support opinions when you falsely called him a pedophile earlier. You were wrong about the age of the victim when you said 12. The youngest was 14. The incidents happened 2009-2013. He tur…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 01:56 AM
7	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Right- we agree he deserved his jail sentence then- now we go to a second legal issue, whether the women accused did anything wrong. Spoiler Alert: They did. I personally will wait till a court hears the case to pass judgement- We don't need to wait for a court decision to know they did something wrong. The evidence of their conspiracy is the very reason his rape charges were dropped. What remains to be seen is whether or not they actually receive punishment. but feel free to pass judgement earl…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 01:18 AM
7	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Yeah he recieved a sentance, and good thing too. people who assault 12 year olds should have their integrity questioned at every oppurtunity. It's almost comical how one-sided your comments are on this subject. It's not a matter of "questioning his integrity." He received a punishment for what he did. They did not.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:57 AM
2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Gee, thanks. That was super helpful. Anyway. He already received a sentence for what he actually did and they applied his time already served towards it. The girls, however, haven't faced any repercussions for their false allegations conspiracy.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:08 AM
5	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy I didn't see that in the clip. Do you have a source on that?	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:50 PM
69	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy At the very least, these women are guilty of violating 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights (which is punishable with fines and up to ten years in prison) by conspiring to commit perjury in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1621 - Perjury generally (which is punishable by fines and up to five years in prison).	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 05:08 PM
14	Men Stab, Rape and Kill Women Because They Can According to The Guardian After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, "men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do," and "[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted." Source: https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx Certainly seems like men are held far more accountable than women.	/r/MensRights	02/07/17 05:18 PM
117	STUDY: Blind Recruitment Aimed At Boosting Female Hires Actually Does The Opposite Because the days of equal opportunity have passed. We're now in the days of equal results regardless of merit.	/r/MensRights	02/07/17 05:15 PM
2	Feminists take down AFA Facebook page with 70,000 fans - Anti-Feminism Australia That still doesn't justify banning people for asking questions. It does when they set up a separate sub specifically for questions.	/r/MensRights	01/07/17 01:32 AM
42	Feminists take down AFA Facebook page with 70,000 fans - Anti-Feminism Australia I'll be honest. I was eating a fruit cup when I wrote that.	/r/MensRights	30/06/17 06:18 PM
149	Feminists take down AFA Facebook page with 70,000 fans - Anti-Feminism Australia Most groups do. Even the ones which claim to be about 'free speech' and such. I'm banned from the_donald, conservative, and Wikileaks. I didn't even swear, just asked them questions which were meant for them to justify their opinion. The number of people who think this is a valid point never ceases to surprise me. Let me break this down for you. You're comparing apples to fruit salad. The_Donald is a sub for his supporters (apples). It's in their sidebar pretty clearly. They complain about censo…	/r/MensRights	30/06/17 04:39 PM
10	College student arrested for making up rape story. 19 year old Rebekah Lim said that a man raped her when she went for a jog. After reviewing cell phone logs and video surveillance, investigators discovered that she was never at the trail at the time she alleged and falsely reported the rape. The first time I saw FTFY I thought it meant "Fuck That Fuck You" and I didn't understand why people were so chill about it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/06/17 02:39 AM
1	Why All Men Should Be Worried By Madrid’s Manspreading Ban Surrender is not an appropriate or effective response to sexism either. It took you a week to reply, and that BS was all you've got? I didn't say surrender was the only other option. There's countless options. But you choose to be sexist. And now you're pretending like sexism and surrender are the only options. You're fucked in the head, buddy.	/r/MensRights	25/06/17 01:55 PM
3	Why Are Men Avoiding Marriage? A Reasonable Answer Phil, I'm assuming you're the author, based on your replies. Is this supposed to be an article or a blog? If it's an article, the tone is far too casual/personal and reads more like a personal soap box than a serious analysis or conveyance of information. If it's a blog, its format and composition seem to be taking itself too seriously, as if formatting makes up for lack of structure and consistency. In either case, the flow is horrible. Lots of back and forth with no clear direction. Even thoug…	/r/MensRights	15/06/17 03:29 AM
1	Landmark decision for smaller divorce payout due to "brief" 4 year marriage. Woman was the one paying out. So far that hasn't happened yet.	/r/MensRights	14/06/17 07:56 PM
2	Landmark decision for smaller divorce payout due to "brief" 4 year marriage. Woman was the one paying out. I agree with you OP that it's obvious sexism that this particular case is the first to get a ruling like this, but overall I'm glad for a precedent like this to be set. If this stands up as a legal precedent for future cases, it's a good thing for everyone. Let's not get so upset about the "unfairness" of it happening to a man the first time - the actual logic of the decision is pretty reasonable, and it would be applauded in this sub sub if the genders were reversed.	/r/MensRights	14/06/17 06:37 PM
1	"2006, the Court of Appeals decided that a man who had behaved as a child’s father and was thought by the child to be a father—what another jurisdiction would call a de-facto parent—couldn’t evade paying child support by proving that he wasn’t in fact the biological father." Here: Before a child support order can be established for a child, the alleged father must either admit or be proven to be the child's father. Source: http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/html/child/child2c.htm That proves you were wrong to say that biological fathers never pay child support. Men who are forced to pay child support for children they did not father at the exception, not the rule. Now find something else to lie about.	/r/MensRights	14/06/17 03:06 AM
1	"2006, the Court of Appeals decided that a man who had behaved as a child’s father and was thought by the child to be a father—what another jurisdiction would call a de-facto parent—couldn’t evade paying child support by proving that he wasn’t in fact the biological father." And quite frankly there are no stats on this, unfortunately. I've looked. Because it's not true. You realize that it only takes one example of a biological father being held accountable to prove your claim wrong, right? Didn't you stumble on any those when searching?	/r/MensRights	13/06/17 08:53 PM
1	"2006, the Court of Appeals decided that a man who had behaved as a child’s father and was thought by the child to be a father—what another jurisdiction would call a de-facto parent—couldn’t evade paying child support by proving that he wasn’t in fact the biological father." Sure thing. Here's just one example: http://mensrights.com/fighting-paternity-fraud-carnell-smith/ He had to fight for 11 fucking years. While the alpha got off scot free and probably impregnated 100 other women in that time. The idea is probably to not tie down alphas financially so that they can reproduce and inhibit betas financially so that they don't even have a chance I never said you couldn't find one example. You claimed that the biological father is never held accountable. One example d…	/r/MensRights	13/06/17 07:09 PM
1	"2006, the Court of Appeals decided that a man who had behaved as a child’s father and was thought by the child to be a father—what another jurisdiction would call a de-facto parent—couldn’t evade paying child support by proving that he wasn’t in fact the biological father." "Go educate yourself; it's not my job to back up my assertions! I can say whatever I want without a shred of evidence and it's automatically true!" You are the one who made the claim that the problem is "alphas" never being held accountable. His about you back that up?	/r/MensRights	13/06/17 06:12 PM
1	"2006, the Court of Appeals decided that a man who had behaved as a child’s father and was thought by the child to be a father—what another jurisdiction would call a de-facto parent—couldn’t evade paying child support by proving that he wasn’t in fact the biological father." Lol, what?	/r/MensRights	13/06/17 02:16 PM
4	Liberal Bigotry Why were you there? Edit: It was a simple question! But keep em coming I guess... You're getting downvoted because it's a stupid question. He was never "there." They sent him a message to his inbox (that's in the screen shot), which informs him that he's banned due to participating in other subreddits.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/06/17 12:47 PM
1	"2006, the Court of Appeals decided that a man who had behaved as a child’s father and was thought by the child to be a father—what another jurisdiction would call a de-facto parent—couldn’t evade paying child support by proving that he wasn’t in fact the biological father." :If you honestly think that's true, you're living in a fantasy world. Can you provide a single instance in which this was not the case? Umm, you mean the vast, overwhelming majority of cases? Fucking Google it yourself. I'm not going waste any more time on your willful ignorance and delusions.	/r/MensRights	12/06/17 09:39 PM
1	"2006, the Court of Appeals decided that a man who had behaved as a child’s father and was thought by the child to be a father—what another jurisdiction would call a de-facto parent—couldn’t evade paying child support by proving that he wasn’t in fact the biological father." I'm not projecting any jealousy. This is a fact. Alpha men get away with all sorts of things. LOL, ok. Do you think there's a legal form the courts use with a check box that says "alpha" on it and they just throw it out or something? How come the bio dad is NEVER held responsible and the cuck beta always is? Please explain. If you honestly think that's true, you're living in a fantasy world.	/r/MensRights	12/06/17 08:50 PM
1	"2006, the Court of Appeals decided that a man who had behaved as a child’s father and was thought by the child to be a father—what another jurisdiction would call a de-facto parent—couldn’t evade paying child support by proving that he wasn’t in fact the biological father." FFS dude. Neckbeard logic like this is why this sub gets a bad reputation on the rest of reddit. Nobody is targeting certain groups of men while treating other groups of men as superior. The issue is universal to all men in the country. Vilifying a made up group to project your jealousy onto and blame problems on isn't going to help.	/r/MensRights	12/06/17 08:46 PM
1	Why All Men Should Be Worried By Madrid’s Manspreading Ban Feminists need to get back in the kitchen. They are destroying society. Sexism is not an appropriate or effective response to sexism.	/r/MensRights	12/06/17 06:48 PM
5	A question: how is it wrong to say "most murderers are men, therefore manhood is murderous" but not "most terrorists are Muslim, so Islam is murderous"? In Islam, murder is baked in. The Quran is the holiest source of information in Islam, and it is filled with murder. (There is no New Testament course correction... indeed the murder-y bits written in Medina are MORE authoritative than the more peaceful bits written in Mecca). The Hadith are the second-holiest source in Islam, and it is filled with even greater amounts of murder, including the life of Muhammad. I wish more people realized this. The terrorists are actually the fundamentalists of …	/r/MensRights	12/06/17 06:40 PM
2	"2006, the Court of Appeals decided that a man who had behaved as a child’s father and was thought by the child to be a father—what another jurisdiction would call a de-facto parent—couldn’t evade paying child support by proving that he wasn’t in fact the biological father." Oh jeeze. How about we just focus on the fact that's it's a clear violation of rights rather than make it a cringey argument about "alphas."	/r/MensRights	12/06/17 06:34 PM
2	Why do most men want their wives to help their economic progress, but not ensure anything in return? Yeah, I agree with you. I'm not OP - I was just pointing out how they seem to have calculated it. Which is - shocking nobody - disingenuously. Yep. Those "statistics" they're touting basically amount to: "This just in! People who have jobs have more money than people who don't have jobs!"	/r/MensRights	12/06/17 06:17 PM
15	Got banned for asking this simple question They really only enforce rules when it concerns subreddits with "problematic" political views. They'll even invent rules and change algorithms for them.	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/06/17 03:42 AM
14	Got banned for asking this simple question I agree, but while we're being clear - the fact that the admins let the mods over there blatantly break the rules about banning shows whose side they're on, so if ever there was a sub for which they'd try to enforce the alt account rules, it's that one.	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/06/17 03:40 AM
15	Got banned for asking this simple question I just don't get what the bans are supposed to accomplish. You can make a new account in a matter of seconds. Even though them banning people like that is technically against reddit rules, it's also against reddit rules to create an alternate account to get around bans.	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/06/17 03:22 AM
3	Why do most men want their wives to help their economic progress, but not ensure anything in return? It just suggests that married men on average earn a lot more than their wives. Ergo, when they're together and their income is taken into account and split down the middle, her "half" is higher than her earning power. When they split, she can call upon (without alimony) only her own earning power for income. Well then they're not actually referring to income, and their statements are misleading/false. What you're talking about is net disposable income.	/r/MensRights	11/06/17 11:05 PM
8	Why do most men want their wives to help their economic progress, but not ensure anything in return? He found that, when a man leaves a childless marriage, his income immediately rises by 25%. Women, however, suffer a sharp fall in income. I can't find the sources for the data mentioned in the article like this. A person's income is not tied to their relationship status, so I don't get how men's income could "immediately rise by 25%."	/r/MensRights	11/06/17 08:37 PM
4	Looks like The Red Pill is now available on Prime Cool. Good info.	/r/MensRights	10/06/17 04:54 PM
57	Looks like The Red Pill is now available on Prime Since this is the top comment right now, I'd like to add that anyone with a .edu email address can get a few months of Prime for free. (I forget if it's 5 or 6 months) Definitely a good deal for the media alone even if you don't care about free shipping.	/r/MensRights	10/06/17 03:59 PM
2	Boyfriend didn't think cops would help with his crazy ex. They rounded her up for him. (small town) Oh, less then half the states. Like I said - not as prevalent as you were implying.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/06/17 02:33 PM
2	Boyfriend didn't think cops would help with his crazy ex. They rounded her up for him. (small town) Unless I missed it you gave one source, the survey study. Yeah, it's pretty obvious you don't read before replying. What exactly would you like a source to? Do I need to source the bill of rights? Pretty much every claim you've made isn't accurate. Go ahead and try to find a source for any of them. You keep making empty claims about how prevalent mandatory arrest laws are, so why don't you back that up? And no, I'm not asking for a single instance - I'm not arguing that they don't exist - you ne…	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/06/17 06:46 AM
2	Boyfriend didn't think cops would help with his crazy ex. They rounded her up for him. (small town) I like how you haven't provided a source for anything you've said, while being needlessly condescending and ignoring the sources I gave.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/06/17 06:01 AM
2	Boyfriend didn't think cops would help with his crazy ex. They rounded her up for him. (small town) It really seems like you're just parroting things you've heard others say and haven't actually researched any of this yourself. - Especially since you're just spouting random talking points that are irrelevant to anything I've said. Nothing I said had anything to do with cops being white knights. It's usually city ordinance (or lack of facilities/support for male victims) that ties their hands. Yes, in general, it's a good idea to call the police, but men should be aware that they are at risk of…	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/06/17 12:49 AM
3	Boyfriend didn't think cops would help with his crazy ex. They rounded her up for him. (small town) Awesome statistic. A self survey of 302 men about Police interaction in a domestic violence situation? I'm not sure if you realize this, but everyone victim or perpetrator believe that they are in the right. The problem with finding these kinds of statistics is that no one cares about conducting research unless it paints males as the perpetrators and women as the victims. In 2010, a CDC study offered this explanation: There has been little research on responses to male victims of intimate partne…	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/06/17 11:47 PM
2	Boyfriend didn't think cops would help with his crazy ex. They rounded her up for him. (small town) There is nothing I can do to change your mind. I know it wasn't intentional, but thank you for this beautiful piece of irony.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/06/17 09:22 PM
4	Boyfriend didn't think cops would help with his crazy ex. They rounded her up for him. (small town) Still no reference to your magical statistic then? Or maybe you just read it on a red pill forum? If you wanted the source, all you had to do was ask. The men in the survey who called the police found them to be "very helpful" in only 19% of cases, and "not at all helpful" in 50% of cases. More importantly, when an abused man called the police, the police were more likely to arrest him than to arrest his abusive female partner. The men who called the police were arrested in 26% of cases, whereas…	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/06/17 09:19 PM
9	Boyfriend didn't think cops would help with his crazy ex. They rounded her up for him. (small town) As with all statistics, they can be twisted to fit any narrative. I'm sure if your statistic is true then it can be partially explained by females calling the police against their aggressors more likely then males calling on theirs. No, not at all. That's not what I said. Read it again. I was only talking about cases where a man calls the police on a woman abuser. That's the point. Even when a man is the one who calls they police he is more likely to be arrested. I will freely admit that there i…	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/06/17 12:56 PM
17	Boyfriend didn't think cops would help with his crazy ex. They rounded her up for him. (small town) If probable cause is evident that a domestic crime occurred and the woman is the aggressor then she's going to jail. It's a mandatory policy for many jurisdictions in the United States. Actually, if a man calls the police on a woman for domestic violence, they are twice as likely to arrest him then to arrest her, but in more than half of cases they do nothing and leave. The rare exceptions to these stats are when the male victim provides video evidence.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/06/17 04:49 AM
4	"Manspreading" has found its match in what I call "Bagspreading" When this image was originally posted, the OP said they'd already asked her, and she straight up ignored him.	/r/MensRights	19/04/17 11:58 PM
4	Waitress jailed for editing video to make it appear police officer threatened to rape her You seriously think 100% of cops are either bad or actively covering for other bad cops? I think you should talk to someone about that paranoia.	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/03/17 07:23 AM
6	Waitress jailed for editing video to make it appear police officer threatened to rape her That's some pretty faulty logic. You might as well say that you think all Muslims are bad because they don't stop the actual bad ones. If that's offensive, good. It should be. It was just as stupid and offensive as what you said about cops.	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/03/17 05:50 AM
15	Waitress jailed for editing video to make it appear police officer threatened to rape her Ok, well. Don't let exposure bias sway your opinion of an entire profession comprised of a lot of good people.	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/03/17 01:21 AM
9	Waitress jailed for editing video to make it appear police officer threatened to rape her So you're saying 100% of cops are bad? You don't think any of them are good people?	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/03/17 01:06 AM
38	Waitress jailed for editing video to make it appear police officer threatened to rape her Yeah, because it's front page news every time an officer does their job, right? Don't let exposure bias sway your opinion of an entire profession comprised of a lot of good people.	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/03/17 12:56 AM
159	More Amy Schumer! Blames "subreddits" for her bad reviews of her Netflix Special. lol she is trying to blame this on the alt right She literally blamed it on "the administration." What a delusional cow.	/r/PussyPassDenied	16/03/17 04:34 AM
0	Father who beat man to death for raping his five year old daughter faces no charges in Texas: Fathers have a natural right to defend their children. So who decides what is objectively correct? Go ahead and show me an example of this happening. I'll wait.	/r/MensRights	15/03/17 08:29 PM
-2	Father who beat man to death for raping his five year old daughter faces no charges in Texas: Fathers have a natural right to defend their children. Blanket statements like this are fun and easy, but they end up fueling things like lynch mobs. A lynch mob wouldn't meet those two criteria, so, no.	/r/MensRights	15/03/17 08:05 PM
23	Dude Same when you say "Hey, guys", it doesn't refer just to males. It's even worse when people try to make an issue of "mankind." "Man" and "mankind" have completely different origins.	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/03/17 06:37 PM
1	We are fighting a losing war against family violence until society withdraws permission from women to hit their intimate partners. WOOZLE - The 70% applies to only nonreciprocal cases not ALL cases. It's been a common misquote and error for some time! That may be true, but women are still the majority perpetrators even after accounting for reciprocated violence. “Reciprocal partner violence does not appear to be only comprised of self-defensive acts of violence. Several studies have found that men and women initiate violence against an intimate partner at approximately the same rate.” Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm…	/r/MensRights	26/02/17 11:59 PM
1	We are fighting a losing war against family violence until society withdraws permission from women to hit their intimate partners. In 2007, the American Public Health Association published an analysis of the data from the "2001 National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health," which included 18,761 US adults aged 18-28 in heterosexual relationships, and found that women are actually more than twice as likely to be the perpetrators of domestic violence than men. From their results: Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships…	/r/MensRights	26/02/17 11:19 PM
0	Hateful mommy messages her boss on facebook [Xpost from /r/childfree] It was first shared in r/childfree. It's her manager not boss, she doesn't have the right to fire her but since she was a shitty employee from the start she can get her fired Yep. When it was first shared, there was no reply yet, and the resolution was different (maybe a different device), so I'm betting it's authentic.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/02/17 10:40 PM
51	TIL mods delete post about a scientific study that shows male victims of domestic violence are more likely to be arrested than the ones beating them. • /r/undelete Statistically, women are the aggressor in nonreciprocal domestic violence in more than twice as many cases as men. Yet, when a man calls to report abuse, he is twice as likely to be arrested as his abuser is. But that's only in the cases where the cops do anything at all. In more than half of those cases, the cops do nothing and just leave, because the laws and policies are about 3 decades behind the actual trends. Because of this feedback loop of not holding women accountable, woman-on-man viol…	/r/MensRights	10/02/17 04:33 AM
1	Mom asks internet how to tell husband her two teen daughters aren't his. She admits that she's motivated to continue the lie for money, claiming it's for her daughters' financial wellbeing. Granted, we're working with a limited amount of anecdotal information, but I'd hesitate to label it as an emotional disorder of any kind that has ups and downs. They seem to be flipping between positive and negative interactions, but not necessarily positive and negative emotions (inasmuch as we were told). The general lack of understanding how others feel seems to be the primary issue.	/r/MensRights	28/01/17 07:53 PM
4	Mom asks internet how to tell husband her two teen daughters aren't his. She admits that she's motivated to continue the lie for money, claiming it's for her daughters' financial wellbeing. So it looks like they are in just in a mania state, but it's not quite the same as solid mania. Acting friendly after not being so is possible. OK...? That still doesn't sound at all like what was described. The coworker wasn't yelling or being mean - or being emotional at all - or having any lapses in judgment; they were just saying and doing things without realizing what others' reactions would be. And then, after seeing the negative results of their words/actions, they tried to fix it with ov…	/r/MensRights	28/01/17 05:19 PM
68	Mom asks internet how to tell husband her two teen daughters aren't his. She admits that she's motivated to continue the lie for money, claiming it's for her daughters' financial wellbeing. Normally legit Psychopaths know perfectly well who they are and can hide in plain sight always being calm and collected. Only revealing who they really are if they trust you or they feel like they're losing control over something extremely important to them making them lash out. That's a misconception. Only very intelligent psychopaths are able to blend it like that, because it takes constant thought and analysis with deliberately manufactured responses. People think psychopaths are all this cap…	/r/MensRights	28/01/17 04:19 PM
1	My school forces me to validate myths that don't exist How many times a day do you tell people you're a lexophile?lol I've never counted, but I'll bet it's fewer than the number of times you put people down for no reason.	/r/MensRights	07/01/17 12:01 AM
2	My school forces me to validate myths that don't exist It seems like you're judging me as a person because I pointed out the correct definition of a word - and then immediately tried to correct me on the definition of the word. That's a bit hypocritical, isn't it? Common usage reigns supreme. adjective 1. lacking in frankness, candor, or sincerity; falsely or hypocritically ingenuous; insincere: Her excuse was rather disingenuous. You also just supported exactly what I was explaining. A false or hypocritically ingenous statement is exactly what I ex…	/r/MensRights	06/01/17 09:30 PM
9	My school forces me to validate myths that don't exist its calculated by comparing the salary of men vs women and not same job vs same job, so cashier at shop vs CEO of huge company. that "statistic" is intentionally disingenuous misleading and people who use it clearly do not care about facts. Hey man, good point, but I've got a quick correction on word choice. Disingenuous is actually a rare case of a double negative within one word. ("dis" and "in" makes it like saying "not not genuine") It means something is said in a way that sounds untrue, but…	/r/MensRights	06/01/17 06:47 PM
2	"Every Brick in every building": a reminder to the Men whose efforts built and maintain our world. Yeah, that's more or less what I said.	/r/MensRights	31/12/16 05:19 PM
2	"Every Brick in every building": a reminder to the Men whose efforts built and maintain our world. If you are lowering your qualifications to hire more "diversity" candidates, then you are hindering your group, because your other employees will see they aren't as qualified and start discounting their opinions and ideas, even good ones. That's what they ignore - mandating "diversity" also forces diversity in experience and knowledge, rather than leaving it just to whoever is most qualified.	/r/MensRights	31/12/16 12:40 AM
14	"Every Brick in every building": a reminder to the Men whose efforts built and maintain our world. My frustration is that the "equality" that is generally desired isn't equal. It's a we want equality except for when its advantageous not too. Oddly enough, there's a word for what they actually want: privilege.	/r/MensRights	31/12/16 12:38 AM
1	Video of woman punching man outside 7-Eleven goes viral \| And it's prompted a discussion about female-on-male violence, with a majority of comments agreeing it's a serious and under-recognised problem Your right, but I wish that clip didn't have such cheesy music.	/r/MensRights	01/11/16 02:41 PM
1	Judge Judy is an MRA. Great quote from her on the gender bias of our family court system. Idk about you, but I wouldn't expect a bunch of random strangers on the internet to believe me if I made claims without any evidence.	/r/MensRights	09/10/16 09:31 PM
2	Judge Judy is an MRA. Great quote from her on the gender bias of our family court system. The cases on the show are arbitration, and everyone involved knows exactly what the rules are. All parties involved must sign contracts agreeing to arbitration under Sheindlin. Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge_Judy	/r/MensRights	09/10/16 07:36 PM
3	Judge Judy is an MRA. Great quote from her on the gender bias of our family court system. What's she supposed to do, make it a multi-day trial for a small claims dispute? If the evidence isn't presented, it doesn't exist in terms of making the decision. They know well in advance that they should bring everything they need. If they don't, that's on them.	/r/MensRights	09/10/16 07:15 PM
2	Judge Judy is an MRA. Great quote from her on the gender bias of our family court system. No.. She doesn't just assume they're lying from the start. She lets them explain, but concludes they're lying when they say something inconsistent or that is common among people who she has seen lie in the past.	/r/MensRights	09/10/16 07:00 PM
1	Woman plots her false rape accusation via text. Gets it screen-capped I get what you mean about not wanting to deal with it, but if someone expresses an intent to commit a crime out of malice, and I have proof of that, I feel like it would better serve justice to let them commit that crime and receive the full punishment for it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/10/16 06:58 PM
9	Judge Judy is an MRA. Great quote from her on the gender bias of our family court system. TIL my views aren't real if I don't spend surplus income starting a movement.	/r/MensRights	09/10/16 05:24 PM
8	Judge Judy is an MRA. Great quote from her on the gender bias of our family court system. Yeah, the guy didn't have any proof when asked for it. Sure, many people don't keep random documents from the 90s, but anything court related is a matter of record, and he could have at least proven to have those documents to show that the case happened.	/r/MensRights	09/10/16 05:23 PM
16	Judge Judy is an MRA. Great quote from her on the gender bias of our family court system. I love Judge Judy. 99% of the time she calls it better than anybody can. Then, there's that 1% of the time where she says something is bullshit and it's actually not. And the thing with her is that when she doesn't understand an explanation, even if it's reasonable to at least myself, she doesn't even attempt to see it from their view. I had one of these moments watching just last week, but I still think she's very reasonable. She'd told the person "I think you lied about [this part of the story…	/r/MensRights	09/10/16 05:17 PM
43	Woman plots her false rape accusation via text. Gets it screen-capped He honestly shouldn't have told her. Let that bitch go ahead and inflict wounds on herself and get charged with filing a false police report.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/10/16 12:58 AM
1	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. As soon as you show a legitimate example. I'm done with your BS until you do.	/r/MensRights	04/10/16 03:35 AM
1	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. Actually, I said “Fuck off." lol decorum Seriously, man. Fuck off.	/r/MensRights	04/10/16 03:26 AM
1	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. I know what I said, and you know exactly what it meant. Insulting me isn't going to change anything.	/r/MensRights	04/10/16 03:15 AM
2	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. You've proven me more right with every reply. That's rich, considering you're the one providing sources that support what I said.	/r/MensRights	04/10/16 02:45 AM
2	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. Like it or not it is a general phrase (another example here... The only time "wage gap" appears in that article is in the title, and they clarify it in the subtitle/tagline right below it: Blame Headhunters for Increasing Wage Gap Research suggests professional recruiting firms are contributing to rising earnings inequality The title is just clickbait since people love reading about who to blame for the wage gap, but they immediately clarify the actual topic before the article even begins. I can…	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 10:32 PM
2	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. The article isn't even about racism. I never said it was. You're so wrong you even summarized it incorrectly. I never summarized the article - I paraphrased the specific excerpts which used the phrase "wage gap." Considering that this all started with a false semantic argument on your part (claiming that wage and earnings mean the same thing), it's not surprising that you can't understand anything I say.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 10:20 PM
2	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. they're quoting the way other people allegedly use the phase. So the writer is not using the phrase, but others are... even though she uses the phrase in the headline. The title is: "IT'S NOT A WAGE GAP, IT'S POVERTY - AND IT'S WHY THE U.S. NEEDS A DEVELOPMENT AGENDA.“ Yeah, they used it in the title, to say that the income inequality of races is not a wage gap. The fact you don't understand this is actually kind of sad. ...almost as sad as your obsession with downvotes.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 08:18 PM
1	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. From your source: We often speak euphemistically about these shortcomings with terms like “income inequality,” “wage gap,” or a “dysfunctional justice system”. But for millions of Americans, these dynamics represent real hardship, which often leads to frustration, anger, and a sense that our country is in trouble. It’s not a “wage gap”. It’s poverty. And it’s the kind of challenge we devote billions to addressing globally but ignore in our own backyard. They're not even using the phrase; they're…	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 08:05 PM
1	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. It helps if you quote the entire sentence: After the passage of the act, the wage gap for minority groups narrowed, both in absolute difference with white wages and as a percentage of white wages, until the mid-1970s; at this time, progress for many racial minorities slowed, stopped, or reversed. Multiple times in that sentence they clarified that they're talking about race and minority groups. The fact that it has to be clarified proved my point.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 07:57 PM
1	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. You took that bait far too quickly. "Racial wage gap" isn't the same phrase as "wage gap." That's why you have to include the word "racial" to communicate that you aren't referring to the gender wage gap, which is what everyone would think if you only say "wage gap." Ninja Edit: Still whining about downvotes, but accusing me of trying to "win the internet" is hilariously hypocritical.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 07:48 PM
1	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. Go ahead and find any example of "wage gap" referring to anything other than the gender "wage gap" and I'll not only concede, but apologize. That is, if you're not too busy sulking about having your irrelevant comments downvoted.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 07:39 PM
1	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. It's not "playing semantics" when you keep misusing words. Fuck off. I'm done pretending you're a reasonable person.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 07:22 PM
2	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. It is perfectly legal to pay a lower wage to someone with less experience. So, yes, there is a wage gap and it is due to experience. FFS. That's not a wage gap, that's fair wage. A wage gap is when pay is different based solely on gender (or another discriminatory factor) with all other qualifying factors being eliminated.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 07:19 PM
1	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. The phrase "Wage Gap" is decades old, Wage gap is an old term, yes, and it originally meant an actual wage gap, meaning men literally earned more per hour for doing the same jobs of the same quality with the same qualifications. But that's illegal now. There is no wage gap now. so you're fighting a losing battle by arguing over wording. Only with people like you who refuse to understand.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 06:58 PM
1	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. Hey to be fair you could also force both genders to make the exact same choices, on average. Forcing people to make the same choices doesn't make them equally qualified or efficient.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 06:47 PM
2	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. It is a distraction that causes the discussion to be derailed and people to get upset. No, it's not a distraction, it's addressing the very root of the problem - a figure being intentionally mislabeled to mislead people into thinking a wage gap exists.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 06:38 PM
2	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. FFS man. You brought up the definitions of the words, claiming that they mean the same thing, but when I point out that the context impacts the definitions, you claim the definitions don't matter? You're deliberately obfuscating the argument so you can claim you weren't wrong based on semantics, rather than concede or learn anything.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 06:28 PM
6	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. That's a weak semantic argument. The 0.77 vs. 1.00 gap is still there, regardless of the term used. That's only true if you don't know what the words mean. You're better off nullifying the gap rather than arguing the terminology. The only way to "nullify the gap" is to pay women far more than men for the safer, easier, and fewer jobs they choose to work. That would close the earnings gap, but would create a gigantic wage gap favoring women. You're deliberately maintaining an ignorant perspective…	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 06:10 PM
4	Saw this on ED, thought it would be relevant here. Conversational definitions aren't applicable when we're talking about the financial/accounting definitions of the words. Context matters a lot. The difference between wages and earnings in the "wage gap" debate is a bit like the difference between earned revenue for a specific job and total income for the total company, respectively.	/r/MensRights	03/10/16 06:04 PM
2	Accidental Red Pill Truths I'm also interested in hearing more about this. You should definitely work on a post about that experience. As long as you include how your experiences impacted your understanding of red pill, I think it wouldn't be out of place here.	/r/TheRedPill	19/09/16 04:26 AM
1	A challenge to all of you - just for fun. This isn't a fun challenge. This is you trying to outsource your personal research project.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 03:45 AM
1	Women upset me Never did I ask any of you for dating advice. I haven't been giving you dating advice. That'd be ridiculous. I've been trying to get you to understand that everything you're saying is contradictory and doesn't make much sense. You should probably go ahead and give up, pull up one of the many hentai bookmarks I'm sure you have, rub one out, and then fall asleep so you can dream about dating one of the women you hate so much.	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 06:53 AM
3	A lesson from the Irish: suffer in silence. Exactly. That's why their brains focus on being social - it's a means of forming relationships to acquire resources and protection for survival.	/r/TheRedPill	18/09/16 05:54 AM
4	A lesson from the Irish: suffer in silence. Women ask for these things because that's just how they socialize with everyone. "Tell me your problems" is just an excuse to build the fake emotional connection that elicits personal validation and valuable information about strengths and weaknesses in other people. That's pretty goddam accurate. Well said. I'm gonna remember this when explaining this concept to people.	/r/TheRedPill	18/09/16 05:52 AM
17	Most aggressive/assertive thing you have done toward cock blocks I don't get why you think walking away isn't alpha. It's typically not worth the effort if you have to be aggressive towards an orbiter. If she's not already into you enough to brush off the orbiter herself, then you're not invested enough to make it worth sticking around, IMO. If you have the mindset of abundance you wouldn't consider trying to fend off a persistent clock block just to get at that one chick anyway, you'd just move on, unphased by it.	/r/TheRedPill	18/09/16 05:46 AM
3	Japan has a worrying number of virgins Yeah, that's true, too. Some of the most fun I had over there was with the 26-30 year olds, because they're getting desperate so they're eager to please. When they're over 30, they tend to either focus on their careers, or go all out debauchery mode since they figure they've lost all hope of getting married anyway.	/r/TheRedPill	18/09/16 05:38 AM
2	Japan has a worrying number of virgins This is true, but I don't understand how it's relevant.	/r/TheRedPill	18/09/16 05:28 AM
7	Japan has a worrying number of virgins It's worth noting that the source says that the statistics used in the article are for the 18-34 age group who are also unmarried, so the rates aren't quite as absurdly high as they seem at first glance.	/r/TheRedPill	18/09/16 05:26 AM
2	Partying, drinking, pure debauchery, and escaping FOMO. Why I believe it benefits most men in today's world to go through a stage like this in life at some point BEFORE moving on. Like others here, I don't buy into the "get it out if your system" theory, but I do think this is worth doing just for the sake of doing it, as many times as you feel like it and are able to fit it into your life. Wh? Because you can. Because you want to. Because it can be a lot of fun. Speaking from experience (I lived off savings in Japan between jobs last summer, with plenty of cushion to let loose with), I don't think I needed to get a party phase of out my system at all - it felt like I nee…	/r/TheRedPill	18/09/16 05:14 AM
1	Women upset me Well fuck me. I thought you were serious this whole time. Turns out you're just a shitty troll (or a compete idiot).	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 02:42 AM
1	Women upset me How the fuck are you going to change the world when you won't change anything about yourself to get what you want?	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 02:23 AM
2	Women upset me I never said I expected a 10 you dumb fuck. I'd be happy with a 7. Might as well shoot for a 10, bub. Same odds as you getting a 7, if these comments are any indication of your real opinions and social skills. I don't agree with your PUA mentality where I have to constantly alter myself to appease and cater to women. Well, first of all, I don't have a PUA mentality. Secondly, constantly altering yourself to appease women is the exact opposite of PUA. Thirdly, that's not even what I'm saying. Tha…	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 02:18 AM
1	Women upset me I don't fault myself because I don't expect anything more than I'm currently worth. Let me stress this since you missed it the first time: Your "worth" is irrelevant. Women will only date you if you have value to them. Value to them. It does not matter what you think of yourself - if you're looking for a girlfriend it only matters what they think of you. Do you seriously not understand that? If I improved myself I would expect something better than I expect now. You don't even have anything to j…	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 02:10 AM
1	Women upset me I said I was above average. Not perfect but better than average. Again, the only way to know this is by comparing to the type of women who will date you. Also again, physical attractiveness is not the only thing women are looking for. I didn't say I didn't have social skills, I'm just not incredibly outgoing. My personality is completely normal and I can be social, I'm just not the life of the party like most girls look for. If you think most women want to date the "life of the party" guy, you d…	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 02:03 AM
1	Women upset me i don't want to live in a hypergamous promiscuous society where men are constantly screwed over by conniving cunts. So you're going to change that how? How is complaining about it and changing nothing about yourself going to change that? You want traditional gender roles, but you won't be a man and take ownership of the problem by doing something about it. You're just complaining and expecting the world to cater to you. I think the world would be a better place if things were more traditional. I…	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 01:33 AM
2	Women upset me You're making it sound like I'm some fat hideous monster with Dorito crumbs all over my chest and mountain dew stains everywhere, and I'm a totally socially inept autistic, and it's entirely my fault why I don't attract women. No, that's how you've described yourself. You said you're not top tier, but not ugly. That makes you average looking. You said you don't have social skills. That makes you undesirable and makes you below average over all, in terms of being attractive to women. What I'm try…	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 01:27 AM
0	Women upset me Not for me, but to make the world a better place. After an entire post complaining about not getting what you want and then refusing to do anything about it, you expect me to believe your complaint is is altruistic? This is the most entitled and delusional BS I've read in a long time.	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 01:21 AM
0	Women upset me Rather than adjust your expectations, or actually do something about the thing that upsets you, your plan is to expect half the population of the planet to change for you? What a joke.	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 01:14 AM
0	Women upset me The way I see it is, guys are less picky than girls. Top-tier guys are willing to fuck lower quality girls cause it's just another notch on their belt. Whereas women tend to strive for the highest they can possibly get. Girls are more than willing to hold out until they get exactly what they're looking for. Ok, whatever - we're not taking about men and women in general, we're taking about you, since you posted here complaining about the quality of women that you choose to date. I'm not a top-tie…	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 12:47 AM
4	Women upset me Edit: Forget everything I said below. This guy is just whining for the sake of whining and won't listen to valid advice. Instead, his plan is to wait for the entire world to change so he can stay anti-social and magically still end up with a 10. Edit 2: Quote from /u/UrbanII (OP) further down the chain: The Beta Uprising will overthrow the Chad hegemony and seize the means of sexual reproduction. [direct link] I can't believe I started out actually trying to help and reason with this guy. I'm ta…	/r/MGTOW	18/09/16 12:17 AM
3	No more slapping - Why I stopped slapping my boyfriend in the face I try really fucking hard to keep a filter in place. Apparently it's not working.	/r/MensRights	15/09/16 02:11 PM
1	Girls before and after swallowing the pill Though I get the feeling that she wanted to cheat on the first place. Otherwise she never would have let herself be put into that position. That's why it's a joke when women say "I never meant for it to happen" or "it just happened" when they cheat. They wanted it, that's why they were in the position to cheat in the first place.	/r/TheRedPill	15/09/16 05:20 AM
3	Girls before and after swallowing the pill Almost everything is worth more time, effort, or money than keeping women happy. That is almost verbatim my exact thoughts when I realized I'd grown into TRP without even consciously trying to. If you pay attention and learn from experience, it's only a matter of time before this is the only logical conclusion.	/r/TheRedPill	15/09/16 05:17 AM
6	The only thing that matters is how you are making her feel in that moment. In a lot of those movies, the men are stoic men who are mysterious. This intrigues the fuck out of women. Also for most of these men, women and sex isn't there focus in life. They have a greater missions but don't mind bringing a woman along if she is alright. That's my problem with PUA in general, because at the end of the day they are making their goal women. This is pretty spot on from my experience and observations. Women want to be swept up and taken on an adventure; they don't want to be t…	/r/TheRedPill	15/09/16 04:45 AM
1	Woman claims domestic abuse, cellphone video taken by boyfriend shows her as the aggressor It's battery, not assault. Assault is the threat, Battery is the action. I see you Googled "battery vs assault" since that's what the Google card says. But no, it's "aggravated assault" when there's a weapon involved. I was mistaken when I only said assault.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/16 03:53 PM
7	Woman claims domestic abuse, cellphone video taken by boyfriend shows her as the aggressor I'm pretty sure it's just battery, or domestic violence, depending on local laws.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/16 05:53 AM
25	Woman claims domestic abuse, cellphone video taken by boyfriend shows her as the aggressor I told the cops i wanted to press assault with a deadly weapon charges, since she cut me with her keys. They charged her with pushing and domestic arguing or some shit. While I can see why keys wouldn't have been considered a deadly weapon, hitting a person with anything other than your own body is technically assault, so I don't understand how they can just not charge her after you expressed your desire to. Edit: Correction: Hitting someone with your body is either assault, battery, or domestic…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/16 04:32 AM
32	TFW your own national leader doesn't know the actual statistics of his pet cause. But very little agency, which was what ended up being more important. True. Unfortunately for men, however, women now have equal agency and more rights - in addition to being able to fall back on to historical gender roles to benefit from the better standard-of-living to effort-and-risk ratio.	/r/MensRights	29/08/16 03:44 AM
64	TFW your own national leader doesn't know the actual statistics of his pet cause. I don't disagree with what you're saying but women were not at the advantage liberty-wise back in the day. I think it was clear that his point was that women had a much better ratio of standard-of-living to effort-and-risk.	/r/MensRights	28/08/16 09:51 PM
3	It's okay though, she just wanted to 'teach him a lesson' Basically any time someone says they did something "to teach a lesson" the real lesson is that they are a horrible person.	/r/MensRights	14/08/16 10:16 PM
4	All-women Ghostbusters reboot starts to collapse at the box office: ticket sales drop 46% - 63% after just one week If you really just wanted to confirm how bad it is, why'd you pay to see it at all?	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/07/16 03:57 AM
1	Schoolboys, 14, who were banned from wearing shorts to school on the hottest day of the year used a uniform loophole to wear SKIRTS instead You can fuck right off, weeaboo, and get your judgmental shit out of here.	/r/MensRights	23/07/16 07:59 PM
1	Schoolboys, 14, who were banned from wearing shorts to school on the hottest day of the year used a uniform loophole to wear SKIRTS instead Is that what the cool kids do now? Accuse people of trying to be edgy? I was just pointing out that not using something that's very useful just because you're scared of a not all that common closed-mindedness of opinions other people might have is rather silly and easy to deal with.	/r/MensRights	23/07/16 08:22 AM
0	Schoolboys, 14, who were banned from wearing shorts to school on the hottest day of the year used a uniform loophole to wear SKIRTS instead This honestly isn't as pervasive of an issue as it sounds in your comment. I got used to wearing my single-strap bag while I lived in Japan, and I've not run into any issues using in the US at all. It's obviously not being mistaken for a backpack, since it's much smaller (my Microsoft Surface fits inside it perfectly with very little extra in any dimension), and I use it to hold my phone, wallet, and keys. Once or twice I've had a friend think he's being funny by commenting about my "purse," but…	/r/MensRights	23/07/16 03:57 AM
0	TwoX feminists' reaction to a man slapping a woman: "Burn that horrible misogynist!" TwoX's reaction to a woman slapping a man: "Everyone makes mistakes" You started the semantic argument. I used the word "attack" and you felt the need to correct me (falsely). Don't try to turn things around now, young lady. I can't tell if you're trolling or not. Either way, there's apparently no way to get through to you.	/r/TheRedPill	11/07/16 06:31 AM
0	TwoX feminists' reaction to a man slapping a woman: "Burn that horrible misogynist!" TwoX's reaction to a woman slapping a man: "Everyone makes mistakes" You do realize, don't you, that that's exactly what you're doing to me, right? you're the one And Don't be triggered You're clearly trying to either insult me into getting offended and going off topic, or you're trying to dismiss my point by being dismissive of me, personally, by implying that I've been unreasonably "triggered". So far, you haven't actually even made a point; you're just trying to pull me into a semantic argument. No thanks.	/r/TheRedPill	10/07/16 09:56 PM
0	TwoX feminists' reaction to a man slapping a woman: "Burn that horrible misogynist!" TwoX's reaction to a woman slapping a man: "Everyone makes mistakes" You've got a very, very loose definition of "attacking" if you think pointing out when someone is wrong is an attack.	/r/TheRedPill	10/07/16 09:25 PM
4	TwoX feminists' reaction to a man slapping a woman: "Burn that horrible misogynist!" TwoX's reaction to a woman slapping a man: "Everyone makes mistakes" Straw man. Top post, from your own link: You don't know what a straw man argument is, do you? A straw man argument is when someone argues against a hypothetical rather than against something specific that actually happened - and that's exactly what OP did. Here's OP's opening: When a man hits a woman, society will dogpile on him and tar-and-feather him mercilessly. But when a woman hits a man, fellow women and white knights will coddle her and try to downplay the situation. He clearly explained …	/r/TheRedPill	10/07/16 11:13 AM
18	Ghostbusters 2016 takes male-bashing to the next level. I shall watch it in the proper, feminist way: laughing at stuff that isn't funny and getting offended by stuff that is funny. In that case, I don't think you'll have to worry about getting offended by anything in this movie.	/r/MensRights	09/07/16 06:36 PM
2	Pro Divorce (X-Post ProRevenge) Well, it's a story from multiple years ago, and obviously more actually went down than just the few interactions that were described in the story. Just because there's more to the story doesn't mean the parts that he told us are untrue. She also probably didn't try to manipulate the kids because, again, she was afraid of her image being tarnished. Any of the individual parts of the story (screenshots of messages, buying time to establish residency and primary caregiver status, reducing income to…	/r/TheRedPill	18/06/16 07:44 PM
3	Please help. Im not trying to be a complete ass with her. Should I tell her that im going to court or just do it? You have no reason to tell her, and every reason not to. Plenty of men get screwed over because they try to be nice and then the woman realizes she can get more money by not being nice. You have no way of knowing she hasn't talked to a lawyer already. Be smart, and be careful about making any promises.	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 07:44 AM
7	Pro Divorce (X-Post ProRevenge) Some guy in bestof did a pseudo analysis of it pointing out some fairly large plot holes. Almost always if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. There may be some truth to it, but it is likely a lie or fantasy of what he wished had happened. If it's the one I'm thinking of, that analysis needs it's own analysis for plot holes. One of the first points was that she either didn't get a lawyer or had a horrible one if he actually got away with blackmailing her, but honestly, she prob…	/r/TheRedPill	18/06/16 07:31 AM
1	Reminder to men: Ok, a few things here. When you say "MRA," that's different than saying"/r/MensRights," because not everyone who cares about men's rights is active in that sub. - But even if you were only talking about the sub, it was still ironic and hypocritical. You are generalizing, by claiming that all MRAs "love pretending that female chauvinists dominate feminism." You are generalizing by bashing an entire group for generalizing.	/r/MensRights	17/12/15 04:14 AM
1	Reminder to men: Yep. MRA loves pretending that female chauvinists dominate feminism. It just isn't true. Holy shit. The irony. You do realize you just did exactly what you're slamming MRAs for, right? (ie: judging an entire group based on the actions of a few)	/r/MensRights	17/12/15 02:42 AM
-1	Reminder to men: I don't care how pissed off they are if they don't do anything about the first group controlling the political agenda behind the feminist label. Your still talking like "the feminist label" is a single organization, or a company, or a vehicle which can only move in one direction at a time. As you said, it's a label, which anyone can and does use for their own individual purpose. It would be wasted effort for equality-minded feminists to spend all their time arguing with female chauvinists. Inste…	/r/MensRights	17/12/15 02:40 AM
2	Reminder to men: We're gonna get to a gender equality movement. We're gonna get to a human equality movement. Ask them if they've ever met the enemy, or if it is another "unknown unknown." People need to remember we are not split 50-50. We are split 99-1. I'm genuinely kind of confused by your comment, given the context. Who is the "them" that you want to ask? Since you said, "another," like I should know exactly what you're referring to, what are the previous "unknown unknowns" you're talking about? Who is the …	/r/MensRights	16/12/15 01:30 PM
-1	Reminder to men: I've yet to see that. That doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Granted, I usually browse /r/all when I'm on Reddit, but there's been plenty of times I've seen stories on the front page that were on the subject of established feminist activists expressing disdain for third wave feminism. If you search on YouTube for "third wave feminism" most of the results on the top several pages will be various videos titled variations of "why I hate third wave feminism," and many of those videos feature women and…	/r/MensRights	16/12/15 10:30 AM
0	Reminder to men: You're not understanding me, so I'll try to make it clearer. This is not a case of the same people saying "We stand for equality" while also bashing men and demanding safe spaces. Those aren't the same people doing those things and saying they want equality. What's happening is some people are using the term feminism to label their hate and SJW agendas, while other people who are calm and reasonable feminists, are just as pissed off at the first group as the rest of us are.	/r/MensRights	16/12/15 07:46 AM
-1	Reminder to men: Feminism is a movement, not a single organization. Feminism doesn't have "leadership." Granted, there are feminist organizations, but they are merely parts of the whole movement. Judging the overall movement (including the peaceful, pro-equality types) based on the self indulgent actions of a few female chauvinists is the same thing as judging all Christians for the attacking planned parenthood, or blaming all Muslims for terrorist attacks.	/r/MensRights	16/12/15 07:03 AM
-1	Reminder to men: You're falling in the same old trap of judging the whole bunch by the actions of the few.	/r/MensRights	16/12/15 06:48 AM
17	Reminder to men: In a word, yes. In a way, no. The most vocal "feminists" who feel like men are wrong just for being men are actually shunned by actual feminists who are looking for equality. Honestly is not feminism that's a problem. It's female chauvinism.	/r/MensRights	16/12/15 04:23 AM
0	SJW's posted this all over my college campus today Don't ask him for proof. He has secret sources.	/r/MensRights	18/11/15 06:46 AM
22	Banned from r/feminism for debunking the 1/5 myth. Indeed. They've gotten more hostile towards men ever since they became a default, and on every front page post from there, half the comment threads are circlejerking complaints about how "the comments in here are why we never should have become a default sub."	/r/MensRights	15/11/15 04:35 AM
9	Girl tries to file for sexual harassment, didn't know there was a security cam. (x-post from /r/4chan) Wouldn't he get sued for defamation of character? She attempted to not only defame his character, but get him fired, and possibly sent to jail - based on false claims. He's just passing on true information about what she did. Considering that he could have become a registered sex offender for the rest of his because of her lie, and considering that there's currently no legal repercussions for false rape claims, I've personally got not issue with the way he's handling it. That's, of course, assum…	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/08/15 06:52 AM
4	8 Warning Signs That He is a Womanizer ... "...it gives a woman a since of confidence." Yeah, when the author uses the completely wrong word in first paragraph of the article, I can't take it seriously.	/r/seduction	04/08/13 02:58 AM
1	During a #Close, a quick way to get a date. but you can't blame alcohol for everything. I can't tell if you're being cynical or if you just misread and though I said you can't blame alcohol for anything.	/r/seduction	23/04/13 11:29 PM
-31	During a #Close, a quick way to get a date. Typos and punctuation errors are understandable as drunken mistakes, but a misused idiom isn't. Not that I think it's a big deal to mouse an idiom,, but you can't blame alcohol for everything. Edit: Wow, um. Ok. I thought this sub was about taking responsibility/ownership of your own actions to improve yourself inasmuch as it is about picking up girls. Out of the 25 down votes this got, I only got one reply, so I'll just assume people are misusing down votes to indicate disagreement.	/r/seduction	23/04/13 02:50 PM
-2	'Are you guys dating ?' Depending on the situation, a simple "Not yet" with a wink can be just the right level of playfulness / sarcasm to keep thins rolling. Edit: Not sure why this was downvoted. I only mentioned it because it's worked for me before. Isn't that what was asked for? - responses that work?	/r/seduction	12/07/12 02:02 PM
1	I'm ugly as fuck. It's a huge mental block. I can't just "accept" it, and it's crippling my life. How do I proceed? Perhaps this isn't the typical response for this sub, but hear me out. Maybe you can have biological game. like others have said, a face isn't the only thing girls are looking for. Aside from confidence and "game," an often overlooked factor is pheromones, which are easily boosted with a proper diet and exercise regimen. I suggest doing proper research (and not buying anything marketed to do so) for what I'm talking about. Anything that will boost your testosterone levels will also boost your ph…	/r/seduction	07/07/12 04:57 PM