TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

eXeHijaKer Archive

View 4 posts and 161 comments by eXeHijaKer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
53

I'm struggling too find the word "all" in the post you're replying to.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 06:07 AM
4

If I remember correctly I read somewhere that if ALL men took just 1 day off society would be set back a few years. Whereas if ALL women took a day off it would amount to about 3-4 weeks. I can't find the source but it doesn't sound that unrealistic..
/r/MGTOW01/08/17 01:50 PM
1

It's 97 in some fields, 103 in others. Average, 100/100.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 01:44 AM
3

You do know that men had the right to vote for about 50 years at the most before women got it right? Because the men had to pay with their lives for the right to vote. If you wanted to vote as a man, you had to be willing to go to war. What did women have to pay for that right? Nothing, they just got it because the men had it. But this didn't stop the draft from being a thing, required to be able to vote if you're a man.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 01:37 AM
9

Yes. We dont' disagree. But no one "Deserves" anything from anyone. People earn respect, earn disrespect etc. The only thing you deserve is love from your parents, that's it. And even that a lot of people fail to provide.
/r/MGTOW30/05/17 08:04 PM
8

You never "Deserve" sex, unless it's literally an actual Prostitute. Just like women do not "Deserve" anything at all from you. No difference at all....
/r/MGTOW30/05/17 07:15 PM
0

Nice ass, nice tits, no brain.
/r/MGTOW27/06/16 07:54 AM
1

Bimbo's get hired all the time. Nice ass, nice tits, no brain.
/r/MGTOW26/06/16 08:42 AM
1

A thing I've wondered for a while. If you had the knowledge you have of the system etc. that you have now. But was given the option to "start over" as a Girl or Boy, which would you choose? I have thought a lot about this myself, but I'd like other people's opinions on it. As far as I've been able to realize I'd stick to the Male side, just seems so much more interesting..
/r/MGTOW11/06/16 07:01 AM
9

http://archive.is/1NDmb She's just an attention whore...
/r/MensRights10/06/16 10:52 AM
3

She didn't mishear though. One made a joke to the other saying "I'd give her my dongle IYKWIM" And she heard it, and was immediately outraged and got them fired for it. Even though it was a joke between 2 friends, that wasn't meant for anyone else to eavesdrop on.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 09:56 AM
1

And, without trying to sound like an SJW, how do you at that point discern between "Not enough evidence" and "False accusation", you risk people being afraid to come out with their accusations in case not enough evidence can be found. Agreed there should DEFINITELY be a punishment for false accusations, but not the excact same sentence. As someone else pointed out in this thread, giving the same punishment undermines the crime.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 08:25 PM
1

Which is why i stay FAR away from their gatherings, yet also expect them leave the gatherings i attend alone, or atleast let them proceed in the way they were meant to, and then after that protest what happened so they have something to base their protests on. Just like what is going on from Sargon and the likes.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:37 PM
1

I agree that most of what went on is definitely.. "Legal".. "Moral" not so much.. The thing about Security though, he was forced, by the school to pay an immense amount of money (Can't figure out if 1k+ or 2k+ or whatever) for security which did nothing, having his own security wouldn't have saved that bill.. And yes, he "incites hate speech", which is his thing. People should be allowed to be offensive. Just like BLM should be allowed to spew ALL the hate they want, although that, for lack of b…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:28 PM
2

I appreciate you looking for that clip, I do, just, Thanks.. I have a habit of getting overly defensive on the internet, given that, simply being on this sub, you get a LOT of hate from people who know nothing of what you stand for, purely assuming stuff based on propaganda spewed my the MSM
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:23 PM
1

I'm the King of edits, i suck at online forum-ing.. I'll just post another reply, later on he even, without a second of doubt says "And this guy just threatened to hit me".. Imho it's just a way to secure himself a bit more, given that obviously security (which they had to pay 1k+$ for ) doesn't want to do jackshit about this idiot on stage
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:16 PM
1

As far as i can hear, this is what he says: "You're threatening to hit me? Well, well, we'll use next few minutes of uhh, thanks for the, thanks for, we've had our, we've had our first threat of violence now so that's great." After that he goes "I think he etc. etc." to stir up more of a fuss, because that's what Milo does, but right as he does it, you can see that he "Breaks character" and might genuinely think it was a threat and therefore doesn't really have the ability to just piss about lik…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:12 PM
1

https://youtu.be/Pw-MnRyIoQY?t=1h7m10s Took me a while to find it.. 2 hour video. But yea, there you have it.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:01 PM
1

The guy with the whistle never made any violent threats toward Milo. I assume you didn't watch the entire thing? Because that's a downright lie. And when you grab someone's arm, and wrestle a microphone out of their hands, during a protest by a movement known to be violent and agressive, i know that I personally would feel threatened by that... So yes "almost anything" violent is considered violence these days.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 03:47 PM
1

Except for the violence committed by that chick when she violently took the microphone from the other speaker. And the threats of violence to Milo from the guy with the whistle Outside of that, no nothing at all... -.-'
/r/MensRights26/05/16 12:38 PM
0

I do it with my buddies, to get drunk as fuck and have fun. If you go there without getting laid being your main concern it can be a good time. As long as you go with some people you enjoy the company of.
/r/MGTOW14/05/16 10:52 AM
1

They're both ridiculous points. If you go around in perpetual paranoia of "all men" then YOU have a problem, not society.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 06:15 PM
5

Women have played a large part in most (if not all) societies throughout history, feminists are the ones trying to ignore their contributions and minimalize the women of history.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 03:16 PM
1

Men don't need the women to reproduce. They just need the Uterus, they can literally fuck her and never talk to her again if it's just about reproduction, child support law kind of hinders this though. The point still stands, men do not need women. There is no need to live with a woman. A wish? For some, yes. But not a need. Edits: Typos and wrong word usage, English is not my native language.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:01 PM
4

Men don't NEED women, men want women. Whereas women NEED men, but don't want them. That's the main differentiator.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 03:16 PM
1

Just half?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 01:30 PM
1

r/feminsm
/r/MensRights05/03/16 12:03 PM
2

Ah, seems like they explained it horribly in the Newspaper then.. Because that wasn't what was written there.. It was basically "Women can go home when they have period pains, it won't count as sick leave, and we'll pay them just as if they'd been at work"
/r/MensRights05/03/16 11:58 AM
16

It's happening in the UK, i read in the newspapers here in Denmark about some UK company making "Menstruation Pains" a valid reason to go home, and get paid "sick leave" which wouldn't be considered actual sick leave.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 01:29 AM
2

Show me an Extremist Feminist or a Mangina that isn't sucking Western Society into a cesspool of man-hating and subjugation, and I'll retract my statement. I say what I observe. Just prove him wrong. It should be simple to you it seems. Or are you just trying to stir shit up?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:14 AM
1

Np, just explaining the way it is employed in the real world. Haven't read it end-to-end myself.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 12:52 PM
1

As far as i can read from that article he didn't escape jail time thanks to this though? So no, it doesn't go both ways. I'm all for letting people who go to jail have a life when they get out, jail is after all made as a recreational tool. And offering jobs to convicts solves this problem.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 12:52 PM
5

It is assumed that the man is the primary agressor. Therefore attacks from a women are assumed to be retaliation to the mans initiatory attacks. Therefore the man is arrested in most cases because "He started it"
/r/MensRights24/02/16 12:43 PM
2

In their eyes there are so few male Victims that they'd all fit there easily with loads of space to spare.... :/ So it's not unlikely.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 11:54 AM
5

If my friends tell me something, i go into it with a belief that they are telling me the truth. This does not mean i'll go spewing it to everyone as the full truth, but you can believe someone without it being the full 100% truth, there's 2 sides to any story anyway.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:11 AM
4

The Criminal, as in, the cunt who falsely accused of rape. The stuff about firing the prosecution is completely stupid.. Agreed.. But letting women who falsely accuse of rape get off the hook, time and time again, does excactly this. Tell them that they can do it over and over and over with no repercussions.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 10:36 AM
8

If the genders were reversed there would be no case. Women can't rape men. Remember? /s
/r/MensRights14/01/16 10:26 AM
2

Gender-Based Violence isn't violence in their terms i guess.. It might be true that a lot of the violence against women is simply because they ARE women, because you have to have some mental barrier damaged to allow you to bypass your biological urge to never hit a woman. (makes no sense, but i think that's what they're trying to do with it.) Not talking numbers at all. Cuz yes, afaik it's about 90% of violent crime happens to men. And... By "Affected" by Domestic Violence it could easily be "Th…
/r/MGTOW12/01/16 08:04 PM
1

No. "If the man didn't have the income to support a family" what about the woman having the income to support a family so he could take that low paying job?.... You just completely missed the point, that doesn't mean he didn't make one.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 12:21 AM
1

Yea.. The whole "We can push EU stuff through without a Majority in parliament" and even more secrecy going on in there, than what already is, is really scary to me. Especially with our current government.. A (now) ex-Defense Minister who's a pathological liar, a Creationist Science Minister who spent 4 years in Bible-School (and lied about this because he knew it wouldn't look pretty) and cheated on his PhD. Things are going so south so quick.. And i thought our last Government was doing a bad …
/r/MensRights30/11/15 11:15 AM
1

But the thing is, even if we Vote no.. There's no chance we won't stay in Europol.. It's not like the rest of EU will want to make Denmark a safe haven for Criminals and Terrorists... Everything about this election just reeks agenda.. Even the Pedofile stuff (Which includes a picture of some guy... for god knows what reason) with an argument about Europol... Fun Fact? Europol doesn't handle Pedofiles, Local police do.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:29 AM
1

But women can't be convicted as child rapists.. They get convicted for inappropriate sexual contact with the children, and go free in way too high a number of cases.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 03:34 PM
2

Yea, that's from 1981.. Or 61, hard to discern.. Has it happened since?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 04:07 PM
1

Where's the proof?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:23 PM
1

Problem is the way you phrase it.. "Quite a few" is yet again an understatement of a lifetime. "By far the majority aren't" is way closer to reality than "Quite a few", which makes it sound like it's about average, maybe more.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 03:44 PM
10

Neither do some women though. Problem is that it's so rare that these women actually have that taken away from them.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:57 AM
2

Let's hope the Feminist outrage is big enough. The Barbara Streisand effect will kick in and we'll have our publicity.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 10:45 AM
1

I don't quite see how this is apologizing for rape.. But if that's all it takes for you to put a label on people here, i see that there's not much point in me discussing with you. Came here with a bias, and is taking every possible step to confirm your bias.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 09:04 AM
6

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 05:56 PM
-1

One thing that's been brought up recently is that we, as a community should not be focusing on what Feminism does and why it's bad. (And instead focus on our own issues only) But looking at the issues facing men today, and the lack of help being given to us, is in 9 out of 10 cases because of feminist lobbying for laws that directly hurt us, or shut down our CTA's about our issues. "Don't talk about Men's issues, it diminishes the issues of women and that's the issues we should fix first because…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 04:52 PM
1

I live in Denmark, and back in my High School years, there was this girl who'd spent about 3 years in USA as an exchange student. She got consistently lower grades because my teacher did not like her accent, or the fact that this girl, I and like 2 other people kept correcting her because her english was so horrible... She pronounced Dog as Dough-e-ge ..... I just wish we could find an alternative to gradings... The amount of stories i have of my own grades and other friends etc. grades being ra…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:55 PM
9

In this specific reason i can see the reasoning for wanting atleast one male teacher in the group, considering the amount of research that has been done to the difference in having a male/female teacher, just like having both parents around.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 09:08 PM
2

Or how about we make a law that punishes you for intentionally hurting other people.. Like, bringing a child into a life that is objectively violating human rights. Be that a couple who don't have the money/time/will to actually support the kid, or a mother who decides to have a child alone because the father doesn't want the kid, but still isn't able to support the child herself.. We could... Imprison these people who are purposefully harming other people. And then take the kids and put them in…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 09:07 AM
1

I generally do not like this guy either, but i think it's quite obvious that he's biased, as this video is clearly trying to prove a point in either direction. That said, i'll listen to what he has to say, and read up on these sources aswell, because knowing Stefan Molyneux there's a good chance he left something out. But yea, as i said, saying that he's biased is quite obvious given the point he's making.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:37 AM
2

I would like to point out that while some of us (Me included) do share the... Fear(?) that the amount of false allegations is way higher than anyone would dare to think, this guy is in no way representative of the majority of this Sub. Throwing allegations around here myself, but he seems a lot like me when i first joined this sub, tired of women because i was treated like shit by some. In that regard the lack of banning on this sub does leave some abhorrent comments here and there, but i would …
/r/MensRights12/10/15 08:43 PM
1

Was there anything along the lines of Salary Negotiations for this job? Because if so, it has nothing to do with breaking the law.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 06:28 PM
4

When i was 12 i could tell you excactly where everything within a 5km diameter was.. A bit more if we're talking very specific locations... You are not giving children enough credit...
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:10 PM
9

Nah.. He was asserting whether telling her to go home and change now, or stay at work as she was that day, and then not wear shorts moving forward.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:29 PM
4

Damn... I got there for This... Apparently pointing out that someone is lying is bad guys!
/r/MensRights29/07/15 04:46 PM
0

A society only of women would not work. I never said this. And yes, we are very much expendable. Saying otherwise is denying facts. Nature even knows this. Which is why men have so much higher variety in IQ etc. Nature experiments much harder with Men to try to make the perfect male. If it fails on Joe Schmoe 1, tough shit, there's billions of other Joe Schmoe's to succeed somewhere and that Male will have his genes move on.
/r/MGTOW28/07/15 04:40 PM
0

In current society, yes it's irrelevant. But it's biologically ingrained in us. It's hardwired to protect the women as they are the ones able of carrying on our legacy. As the RedPiller's say "80% of women will have sex with 20% of men". Because they are the ones deemed "Useful" or "Worthy". The rest of us. Tough shit, biology gave us the shorter stick and our best hope is to get Cuckolded or see the women's Lizard Brains hope that the 20% of men's Genes will cause better mutations next generati…
/r/MGTOW28/07/15 03:03 PM
1

Let's be honest. Even as a MGTOW this should be known. The species can easily survive with 500 females and 1 male. But 500 males and 1 female and the species would die out. At the end of the day we are expendable, and as such should make sure to detach us from the parts of society where this expendability can be used against us.
/r/MGTOW26/07/15 10:24 AM
1

If women aren't worth the effort why do we have all these things available now then?
/r/MensRights21/07/15 04:08 AM
1

But then don't make assumptions based on it? You have NO idea of the content of the comment. You have an assumption based on your prejudice towards Dai_Einon. And even have the audacity to claim to have read it, while simultaneously claiming to not have read it but still knowing what it says because "It's so obvious what it contains"...
/r/MensRights19/07/15 08:25 PM
0

Read it and if you have something to say then, say it. Which I did… We have now twice established that you didn't
/r/MensRights19/07/15 08:14 PM
3

"Frankly, the rest of it is tl;dr. I scanned it" No. You didn't read it. You scanned it. You said it yourself.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 11:28 AM
2

"I was abused" goes on to abuse her critics all throughout the video.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 10:11 AM
1

Let's not paint the devil on the wall shall we. This is what gives us a bad reputation. There is a very good chance his wife wouldn't do stuff like this. There are plenty good women. More than the bad apples, but the bad apple spoils the bunch. (Not saying that there are few of the bad apples though)
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:58 PM
1

Then who should we aim to protect? The women?
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:31 PM
2

She did things that were generally bad moves for a CEO of reddit, like talking bad about Redditors and such (Reddit's SoI is it's users) and firing the person in charge of AMA's causing a riot on Reddit.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:56 PM
1

But the real question remains. How do we repair the damage done? How do we prove her wrong? What are our arguments to the opposite? Jack Thompson says the excact same thing as her, he just replaces misogyny with violence, and everyone flames him for it. But that's a-ok because... He's wrong? Most likely because he's male so he can take or it whatever.. But i really hope we can get some serious, actual debate on the matter. And not have our society fall back to a reversed middle-age society, wher…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:56 AM
2

Really though. I love this video. Remove every mention of "Male, Female, He, She" and replace it with "Human, Humans, Peoples" and she has very, very good points. The whole "I shouldn't be harrased for my opinions because of me being a female" is just straight up wrong though. That's not the reason people are mad. Because.. Jack Thompson, if you lie and spew shit. People will call your ass on it....
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:08 AM
6

"We're just perpetuating this notion that we should all suffer alone. We should all just toughen up, and "grow thicker skin" which we shouldn't be forced to." So like what men are expected to do? It's not very fun is it?
/r/MensRights11/03/15 08:25 AM
3

Thanks a lot. It's great to have other people share their ideas and the like. It's just demoralizing to think that i live in a modern society and that my family are actually critical towards what they hear and read, and then see them agreeing 100% with what is spewed everywhere.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:32 PM
2

Thanks ;) I've tried spreading this, and talked to people about it. But it's an uphill struggle when you can't even start at home, because your family are opposed. My entire family agrees with the feminists. Even though i've tried putting forward solid evidence, i just get shut down with "Feeling-Evidence" in lack of a better word. And when trying to inform them of the whole thing about the Wage-Gap etc. i get am told to "Start living in the real world and not this fantasy world i've lulled myse…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:04 AM
3

Write up everything about the case. Names, places, What happened, when it happened, how it happened. Be as objective as you humanly can, send it to as many papers as you can saying that you've been the victim of yet another case of false rape accusations. If you're lucky someone will pick it up, if not, contact bloggers or youtubers or something of the kind. The more people who are put through this who reach out to the community to get it spread, the quicker we'll get changes happening.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 07:50 PM
1

I still don't get what you're trying to say... A low bar? How is that? What in the OP is evidence to prove that you've found a low bar of society? If that is the bottom of society we must have one hell of a great society on our hands.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 07:45 PM
0

Yet the other part of my comment does 100%. So please, don't act like a douche and take whatever you don't like about my comment. It only helps to prove my point even more.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:17 PM
1

What excactly are you getting at?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 03:36 PM
1

The Gender Stereotype is that most women do, and being a species focused on reaching norms, most everything out of the norm is looked down upon.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 11:59 AM
-3

The difference is the ease in acquiring said sex. A guy is expected to spend money on a girl, dinner, drinks, w/e. And then he MIGHT get lucky she leaves with him and not some other dude. Women just have to go up to a guy, press her elbows together in front of her chest and boom it's solved. THAT is the reason it's different there. And i honestly don't think women think men are cool if they sleep around a lot. But men do, cuz hey, it's a status symbol for men, that you can land whoever you want,…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 11:57 AM
4

In general the punishment for false rape accusations is just simply trivial at best. You can lie about rape with basically zero risk of being charged.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:18 AM
2

And you too. It really helped improve an otherwise shitty day :) Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 02:43 PM
2

You definitely do. But most of the time we don't get the benefit of the doubt. So if we want to be seen as a serious movement in the media, we need to stay clean. Keep to the case and make sure, as i said earlier, that we don't end up sounding like whiners. Edit: And i'm sorry if i come off just trying to be opposite of you. I agree with you, i just think it's important we try not to act like the Femi-Nazis, and make our voice heard in a calm an collected manner.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 02:33 PM
3

Some of it, yes. I agree 100% Although.. Where do the "is 95% of workdeaths" relate to any of the positives for females though? Suicide rates, rape allegations, lower life expectancy. There are a lot of the points in that graphic that have no relation to the positives listed on the left side at all. If it was kept to purely counter-points to the positives from females, i wouldn't have minded. It just seems like someone wanted to prove that some of the positives for women hurt men, and figured th…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 02:13 PM
7

I was thinking the same. And i feel it's silly to only bring up the positives for women and only negatives for men. There are positives and negatives for both sides. I really don't think this graphic puts MRM in a good light, moreso makes us look like whiners who only see negatives in our society when it's harmful to us.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 01:45 PM
0

So there we go, stupid argument. Thanks for proving my point.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 07:55 PM
1

Can be said for men who live with a woman aswell. And no, i'm not reaching. Do you REALLY want to use these feeble arguments to hate on women? Are you really gonna reach that low to hurt the feminists? To talk about their fucking use of MAKEUP? Or are you one of the misogynysts in our community that i want nothing to do with? I'm here to bring light to Men's Issues and work towards equality, not try to bash a specific gender for a "guesstimate" on their Carbon Footprint.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 07:08 PM
2

Men tend to build stuff in their houses, or use computers more regularly, or bigger/better computers. I'm not talking construction workers. I'm talking "handymen" who build stuff for themselves. Which 9/10 times doesn't have anything to do with the outside world.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:38 PM
1

And just aswell, as someone above stated, men drive to work. And we generally use more power-heavy electronic devices. So it's a really silly thing to bring up, because on average it would probably even out. And even if not, so what?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:22 PM
2

I never said it was rational. I said it's biologically encoded in us to do so.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:03 PM
3

I'm quite sure i can't fly. But i'm not gonna jump off a bridge to prove it. Or a less extreme example, i don't wanna go on the biggest roller coaster, because i'm almost 100% sure i'm not gonna enjoy it. Why would i go up there, to prove to other people/myself that i won't enjoy it, when i can be 100% happy with not going on the ride in the first place, and just "knowing/not knowing" with myself that i'm not missing out. If i AM Hetero, i FEEL hetero, and i PREFER being hetero, why would i wann…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 02:34 PM
-3

Same for Feminine traits in men. Not gonna bother explaining it further than "Biology, Cavemen, survival of the fittest" If you can't figure out what i mean from this, google it.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 02:28 PM
1

Genetic? In my home country those can be made for you.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:58 PM
1

Just like guys who won't go anywhere near a girl with less than D Cups. (There are lots of them) The argument had to do with the article, not what others feel are "expected"..
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:23 AM
1

How about "Somebody i know and care about is becoming an MRA" Instead?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 10:03 PM
1

But it's not expected of men, so it wouldn't really have place in this article.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 09:55 PM
1

They don't. They need your gender. They can find a new "U" in a few days.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 09:53 PM
2

Honestly, me neither. As soon as it's allowed for men to have the same, and call them "Men Only" on the same premises. Which is why idgaf about Soccer Teams, Handball etc. etc. being separated into Men/Women. I still think it odd to have to split them up if you really do want "equal treatment". But yea, that's their choice in that case, because men are allowed the same.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 03:49 AM
-1

BUT, on the other hand. They're making exclusive groups based on Gender, which is discrimination where i come from. And given the comment on the post, the plan is to expand into Women's Only Tournaments if possible, which means a money-making possibility based on discrimination. Please do stop pretending that there wouldn't be an outrage if the opposite group was to pop up.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 03:26 AM
3

That's not my point. My point is the focal point of discussion for the different movements. On /r/mensrights we honestly don't give a damn about women's problems. I mean, we might, and most do, but there's no posts about it. Cuz that's not the point of this sub, just like /r/feminism doesn't have posts about Men's Rights. Points of the movement are completely out of the discussion here. Because i think we can easily agree that Feminism is, in more than one regard, a hate movement towards men, ba…
/r/MensRights22/10/14 11:56 PM
6

Which part of it was it that "wasn't read" if you would please enlighten me. Because from where i'm standing it seems like a perfectly fine argument for Male-Only Schools.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:21 PM
-5

Doesn't remove the fact that Feminists want equality "for women" and some MRA's want equality "for men". The egalitarian Men also usually identify as MRA though because it's hard for us men to have our issues recognized in the Media.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:10 PM
1

As was also posted above you, sex with minors have implications to their health, which won't change simply because we talk more about sex. I could rant for hours on end about sexuality and whether or not it's okay how we look at sex today. TL;DR on that: Women are allowed to have sex how/when/where they want. Men, are allowed to have sex how/where/when the women wants. Equality? Okay.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:40 AM
1

His post very clearly said "Protection or Equality UNDER THE LAW". So it might be you who's a bit jumpy with your responses. But what do i know, it's not like you didn't read his post thoroughly is it? Which quite obviously means that the law applies to women, but not to men. Like this case, where if the teacher was a man and the minor a woman he'd be a pedophile and be sent to jail for it. She gets a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:53 AM
1

It started with this: http://imgur.com/a/4VOcx Which was supported and backed up by Anita Sarkeesian Later her "Threats" happen, and this is what people find: http://i.imgur.com/7edKF5P.jpg http://cdn.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/BwJNnfUCAAA9VrZ.jpg It's fishy, and if that isn't faked i don't know what is.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 02:55 PM
1

I'll link them tomorrow when i'm not drunk out of my arse.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 01:52 AM
0

You could use the standard Double-standard argument that is used for a lot of the more "In-The-Open" issues such as sex/sexuality for one, this could be an entire Masters Paper ;)
/r/MensRights18/10/14 01:51 AM
1

We have a "Love Everybody Movement" It's called Humanism or Egalitarianism. ;) You can use that as a reference point. I'm an Egalitarian, but i use this sub to help shed light on issues that aren't womens. ;)
/r/MensRights18/10/14 01:49 AM
4

Many of the threats have been proven, beyond reasonable doubt with no counter-evidence, to be faked. So yes, we should distance ourselves from the people who threaten, which seems to be Anita and the like.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 03:22 PM
5

Funny thing is that the most vile comments on this Sub come from Feminists directed at us, not the other way around. I don't know if this is an indicator of anything but it could seem so. :)
/r/MensRights17/10/14 01:08 AM
1

You actually are. And could we please try to argue with each other and not comment on people's english? Not everyone has english as their first language, or studied english extensively.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 12:37 AM
1

Except it isn't if you base it on their arguments. And that is all you can do.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 12:35 AM
1

You don't have to help men, to not hurt them. Just like, i don't have to go to your home and help you with the dishes and cleaning. That doesn't hurt you. But i agree that dealing with everything by yourself CAN be a struggle. (HORRIBLE AS FUCK example, but it was the best i could come up with at 4 in the morning)
/r/MensRights12/10/14 12:25 AM
1

I give up, we've reached a point where i'm just wasting my time talking to you. Don't bother replying, i'm not even gonna read it.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:01 PM
1

Given your arguments that women should be treated better than men and your feminist-argumentation strategy it'd definitely say yes. You're definitely not an Equalist/Egalitarian/Humanist, not a Men's Rights Supporter either. So please do explain what you are then.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:31 PM
1

There we go. Finally you show your true colors as the troll you are. Yes i am upset that it's physically impossible to have a proper argument with a feminist because ALL of your arguments are baseless beliefs and ad hominem attacks. Try to argue with facts and not wishful thinking, and try to drop the troll attitude if you want people to have sympathy for your cause.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:01 PM
1

True, my debunking have been ambigious in the context of your arguments, which are opinionated blog posts which are apparently taken for fact in your world. But considering you haven't had a single REAL argument, with REAL facts and stats that didn't contradict themselves 2 or 3 times in the same blogpost, that actually included both sexes i don't see the point in saying that my arguments have failed. Since they've done completely well at shutting down your arguments every. single. time.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 11:24 AM
1

Please point out my strawmen :) I find them quite hard to see. Edit: And please don't tell me that i'm a lost cause if i can't see them myself or w/e, cuz from where i stand you've been trying to convince me of your beliefs purely by telling me that it's right, considering that any and all arguments you've had have been demonstrably false.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:02 AM
1

Call it edgy, call it a wakeup call. Anywho, i believe you'd get a lot more out of your life if you actually realized you can't make people believe anything just because you say it is so.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:51 AM
1

While i'm not directly telling you what to believe, i'm trying to make you argue FOR your beliefs or opinions, because in my book, if you can't stand by your Opinions or beliefs, you need to reevaluate your life. Which is why i want you to make come with substantial evidence for your claims, because it is excactly what you say, a belief. It has no basis in reality. Just as the paygap and other "beliefs". So i wish you good luck with accomplishing anything worthwhile with your life, basing your l…
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:39 AM
1

We're only going in circles because your arguments don't hold water. You're arguing on wishful thinking, hoping that people will believe your arguments if you hold on to them valiantly enough. Which is unfortunately how way too many things about Feminism is being treated today. If you want people to believe your shit, provide facts, or arguments which are hard/impossible to deny. Yours are just not that though, your arguments are weak and way too easy to debunk, even using your OWN SOURCES!
/r/MensRights03/10/14 11:04 PM
1

Nonono, you've made allegations, give me proof that my reasoning is wrong. You need to stop this feministic argumentation. Valid Arguments are paramount in proper discussions. So if i am that wrong it shouldn't be hard for you to simply prove it to me instead of just SAYING that you're right. I can easily say, the sky is green, look at all these drawings and paintings i have where the sky is green. If you can't believe that the sky is green just from that, then believe whatever makes you happy. …
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:51 PM
2

Because in "Tribal Times" there was no prevention methods, so a woman having sex with a man would in 9/10 cases result in children. So women would "save themselves" "be saved" for the "Best man of the tribe" to mate with. Which carried on into our religious society which sought to oppress women (And succeeded) so this was yet another way to opress women who had sexual encounters outside marriage. Now we're back to women and men having equal rights (Fact. Under the law, there's nothing a man can …
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:25 PM
1

He was handcuffed and searched because her friends reported a rape-in-progress. And what is that shit about "Superior sex" I don't know where you belong, but it's definitely not here. Also, where did i tell OP to be idle? On the contrary i encouraged him to contact her about this and make sure he ensures his stance in case of a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:59 PM
2

An opinion piece focusing on Women solely, which is employing a logical fallacy. Simply because the women with more sex partners have worse marriages doesn't make it the deciding factor. There could be many other factors simply not being taken into account. And again, where are the men in this? Come on.. Give me undisputed evidence. Actual facts, and not blogs which are heavily opinionated that actually considers BOTH Men and Women on equal footing. Edit: What about Age, Social status, Childhood…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:52 PM
2

Ahw come on.. Seriously? I just debunked your entire argument and THIS is your response?... It's not about being uneager. We can agree that there is a difference between our sexualities..100% given what i said earlier about being a sexually dimorphic species, we are NOT equal in all and every aspect of our life. But we simply are in some.. But that's besides the point, if you want me to believe it, give me undisputable facts and i will believe. If you can't do that, admit that you have nothing t…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:19 PM
1

Let's just for sake of argument take this BLOGPOST which talks about a study made, which focused SOLELY ON WOMEN as fact. It says "This effect is strongest for women who have multiple premarital coresidental unions." But later says that Teachman didn't base his findings on the amount of sexual encounters, merely the fact that there was a single one before marriage with someone who wasn't the Husband-To-Be. Which would indicate somehow that men were still considered in this, and it DOES have an e…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:04 PM
2

That's a bold claim. Could you please document your statement with just a single source saying this? And let's just say that this is right, what makes this reason applicable to this case of Men and Women seducing people of the opposite sex younger than themselves?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:25 PM
1

So what? Many a woman have, but was this girl a Virgin? We don't know, empty claim only furthering the arguements feminazi's use about our movement that we're women-hating bastards. It's really despicable that you would assume ALL this about a woman you have basically NO info about whatsoever. Who knows, maybe she doesn't have anything to do with her family, so their influence on her and her decisions are very minor. Maybe she knows excactly what she wants to do with her life, Who she wants, how…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:21 PM
1

I honestly can think of only one. That sex can lead to childbirth, wherein the woman risks dying or permanent damage to her body. Which is why we have all kinds of different Prevention methods. Besides that i'd like some elaboration on your part, instead of merely statements which do nothing to further a discussion anywhere.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:14 PM
1

Then what excactly are we interested in doing? And what allowed you to reach that conclusion? Also, i didn't say we were the same, i believe quite the opposite, given that we're a sexually dimorphic species which means we will never ever ever be 100% equal on all levels. But just simply stating that "Men are not Women" sure gives off a vibe saying "Men and women should not be treated equally".
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:04 PM
2

That's yet another statement but no explanation, i'll sit tight and wait for it.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:02 PM
1

I don't think you understand the point of this sub then. It's raising awareness about shit men go through to remind/inform people that not only women have problems in our society and therefore "Feminism" (Which in the word itself is problematic) isn't what we need, whereas Humanism is, because both sexes face sexism, both sexes are treated bad in some aspects of their life while being preferred in others, and we need to try to do something about this. MRA's and MRM Supporters therefore use Men-F…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:59 PM
2

Honestly, i don't think this is doing any good to the case, to him or to anything else. She was into this, she wanted to take part, and OP is shit-scared, i feel it's really "Not nice" (I can't find a proper word, english is my second language) to him. OP this is not a good situation, if you contact the Site, keep the texts, and try to have a conversation with her about it on the site i can guarantee you that that'll get your further than worrying about all the horrible things SOME women put SOM…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:52 PM
1

How is it different? Is the sexuality of one sex more "right" than the other sex? I'd appreciate if you'd explain to me why and how there's a difference between a man and a woman seducing someone of the opposite sex younger than themselves.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:09 PM
3

No, that's quite an established fact. Where're you going with this excactly? Different rights and laws for each sex or? Cuz on this sub it's about Equality afaik..
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:03 AM
1

If you are indeed here to hear both sides, and not assume shit with no base in reality. Then please do so, try to be constructive as that produces actual discussion. Instead of what you're currently doing (Not reading anything and just being mad at the sub because of something you IMAGINE being there.) Don't expect any more replies after this, since i can't be arsed with people like you...
/r/MensRights26/09/14 03:05 AM
1

But you're not hearing the arguments. You're just spewing shit and not reading what people are actually saying. Thereby "The Echo Chamber" that you should go back to..
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:58 AM
1

Who ever said that? Go back to your own so-called "Echo Chamber" instead please.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:01 PM
0

One thing really pisses me off about these so called "Social Issues Bloggers." It's that they employ misandric rhetoric to excuse women's wrongdoings, and then censor the Comment Section to make sure people eat it up like pudding. I'm not saying people are stupid, but in general if you just hear something and get no one elses opinion the vast majority of people are inclined to believe it..
/r/MensRights24/09/14 01:38 PM
1

Thank you. :) I find it appalling that "Equality" is about taking notice of X amount of girls will be given away for marriage at a young age, but not giving a fuck about X (Or more) amount of Boys will be forced to be Child Soldiers in a war they have no idea about or place in. Our equality discussions are unfortunately never about equality but about getting it better for women. If getting it better for men has to be a byproduct, that's a necessary evil for the Feminists..
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:07 AM
4

Except it's all about women, it's all about men need to help women. She only brings up problems for men, because women can't be "fulfilled" before those problems are solved. If it doesn't have an impact on women, she doesn't give a damn.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:13 PM
1

Uhm.. My brain hurts. Reading that article, and looking up and seeing the word "Rational".. ouch..
/r/MensRights22/09/14 10:25 PM
7

The FIRST DAMN PARAGRAPH is filled with allegations and assumptions... What in the gosh-darn-damnit is wrong with Wiki these days :S
/r/MensRights16/09/14 10:17 AM
1

I had an abusive girlfriend. We dated from 18-21 (I'm 22 now, it's 6 months ago) She was the one who ended up leaving me, making me believe I was the bad guy in the relationship, even after cheating on me with 6 different guys in a span of 3 years (Minus 36 minutes (She broke up with me 36 minutes before our 3 year anniversary, after spending 10 days on a ski-trip with an old fuckbuddy)). It almost tore my life apart, i couldn't imagine living without her (I was in a deep depression around that …
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:47 AM
1

I genuinely can't think of any as it stands right now. I think the closest i'd come to it is as you say "Issues relating to childbirth", but it's more a precaution i might be taking aswell in case something comes up where it actually WOULD be detrimental to either sex to give them a 100% equal judgement on the case.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 07:16 PM
6

I think the main problem of our equality discussions today ignore the fact that we are a Dimorphic Species. Men and Women are different, both physiologically (?) and Psychologially. In danish we have a term "Milimeterdemokrati" (Milimeter Democracy), i don't know if there's an equal term in english, but basically it means that everything has to be equal down to the tiniest detail. With a dimorphic species that just can't happen. Biologically men will generally take Violence as an easier option c…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:02 PM
4

This is not completely true. Feminism started out as a fight for equality. They have achieved this now. There is nothing that a man can do under the law, that a woman can't. Problem is now though, that women get treated "better" in some circumstances, and men "supposedly" get treated "better" in others. So what feminism is now, is an attempt to keep their own cake, and also have ours, instead of sharing the cakes equally.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:39 PM
1

But if their opinion, even if they are too slow to realize the truth, is that it's not for men, it shouldn't be used in an argument. For them it's not for our sake they dress-up. Which means for them it's not an expense related to dating.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 01:47 PM
1

Then why are we using it in a discussion about Expense Gaps? And it's not just feminists.. Every woman i've known has always said that they don't dress-up for us, but for themselves and other women. This would mean that the "Make-Up" expense is just as much an expense as their 1000 pairs of shoes, dresses, tops, tshirts, jeans, underwear you name it. Which has NOTHING to do with us. Whereas paying for a date is not something "we do for other men or ourselves".
/r/MensRights03/09/14 09:41 AM
1

But don't women always say that they don't dress-up etc. for our sake but for their own sake? That undermines your entire argument right there.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:31 PM
6

Only problem i see with this is that him "asking if he's allowed to do it" means that he wants to do it = Consent :( Awesome idea though.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:57 PM
2

And this from a woman? That was an amazing read.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:59 PM
1

Agreed
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:06 PM
1

Yea, i realized later it was silly of me to not be able to document this, since it was based on personal experience and information from my circle of friends.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:47 AM
1

I really appreciate your post, and it helps me out a lot with where i should go and how i should argue with these people. As i posted earlier my 85% was a number fetched out of thin air, mostly based on personal experience and the stuff i get from a police officer in my circle of friends (who is a woman).
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:46 AM
1

I'd love to post the responses, but i have since this post deleted her from my friend's list. I was attacked by 3 women and 2 WKs about nitpicky things in my posts, they started ridiculing me, playing "Derailment Bingo" etc. All to piss me off and make me get out of the conversation. The posts were mostly about "Don't be defensive and take this personally, this is not an attack on men, and the fact that you take it that way proves my point that men are controlling and manipulating" This is not a…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:44 AM
3

So basically the only thing to do is shut the fuck up and let them run their show? And at some point they'll cross some line somewhere and things will get better? It's hard to bring up stats, i decided to have a serious argument and realized that my 85% was a number i fetched out of thing air, but i came with serious numbers from police reports and was shut down instantaneously, 2 WK's even joined in and told me about how i needed to shut my fucking mouth because i was only hurting them and othe…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:26 PM
2

I don't kno where i wanted to go with this, and if i'm going too far or it's just a load of bullcrap, please do downvote me.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 08:47 PM
7

It might be a joke, but people always make this joke, it's always: Oh the men aren't following your every wish, FUCK EM UP. But if men were to try something similar he would be controlling, stalking or abusive.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter