TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

e_d_a_m Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by e_d_a_m on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah, I actually agree with you, there will. Bit the big problem with those cases is that the court will be completely unable to detect them! I've seen first hand how powerful narrative and bias are in the family court. You have to remember that those situations are never amicable (or there would be no case). And with a lack of consensus from the parents, the court can only rely on outside agencies (such as CAFCASS in the UK, who are appalling). In my case, a CAFCASS officer actively sought to m…
/r/MensRights02/04/18 11:09 PM
1

Those are valid points. But weigh it up... On the one hand, you might have slightly longer travelling time to school (assuming a parent isn't willing to move). And, more importantly, the disruption that it causes to a child to move between two homes. (My children are in this situation, so I can confirm that it isn't ideal.) On the other, though, the child loses a parent! They lose one of the two closest, most important people in their lives, and all the wisdom, experience, love and, well, just t…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:36 PM
1

I would love to know why you think that? Are you saying it's not realistic that the law will even be enforced in such an unbiased manner? Or are you saying that a 50/50 default wouldn't work somehow?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:33 PM
1

I'm not sure I understand...? I wasn't taking any view on morality. I was just trying to determine whether more kids were killed by women was because more women had sole custody than men. I.e., the statistics could be the result of either of these cases: a) that, statistically, a child is more likely to be killed by a single parent if that parent is male, but that there are so few male single parents that it is mostly women that kill their children, or b) that a child is more likely to be killed…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:30 PM
3

Do you know if these statistics are probabilities of being harmed/killed by a parent of each gender, or per capita? That is to say, are more children killed by women just because women more often have custody of their children?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 10:44 PM
23

In the UK is it fucked. I have majority care of my children now, thank god. But, three months after I left her, essentially taking the kids with me, my ex was able to almost completely cut me out of their lives for over 9 months while I fought her in court. She was after money and my house. In total, it cost me over £30k to stop her using them in an attempt to profit. The courts, police, social services, school, everyone supported her. She was even able to claim financial aid by pretending she'd…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 10:38 PM
45

To be fair, it's because whenever you have a mother and father in a court, it is only because there is a struggle for control -- even if they both think that control is warranted (i.e., they think they're doing what is best for the kids). So if follows that, in a contested situation, as the family court will always be, the court should have a duty not to tip the balance of power one way or the other. Family court should default to 50/50, unless there is a demonstrable reason not to.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 10:31 PM
1

This^ and well said!
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:19 AM
22

Fathers being deprived of their children, and children being deprived of their fathers is, to my mind, the single biggest issue that we need to come to terms with as a society and address. It is the root of, and is indirectly responsible for so much of the sadness in the world.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 02:57 AM
1

Anne. Fucking. Widdecombe. Enough respect... I'm moving to her constituency just so that I can vote for her!
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/17 10:29 PM
-3

This video annoys me, and there are very few times that I can conceive of wanting to use it. But right now is one of them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZHvd0ks7Es
/r/MensRights05/12/16 01:29 PM
1

police were dismissive of claims such as treating someone who wasnt in tears as not being believable I find this very, very hard to believe. At present, the police seem poised to take on and run with any story -- no matter how stereotyped and unsupported by the situation -- in which a woman is claiming victimhood. I suspect they have to: they're being pushed in this direction, as discussed previously. I can not believe that the attitude that they shifted from was so far in the other direction, t…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 06:23 PM
1

The ONS analysis is quite interesting and would seem to back-up my assertions about the direction the police are being pushed in from "above". Specifically, and although they state an increase in the number of allegations, the ONS say this is not thought to be as a result of an increase in the amount of crime. They suggest that the increase in the number of allegations is because of: a) "an increased willingness of victims to come forward" I strongly suspect that the use of the word "victim" her…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:30 PM
1

it wasnt categorised as a hate crime sighs thats how it was pandered to by the press Fair enough -- forgive my slack working. I think my point stands, though. That the police even felt the need to make such a statement shows the direction that they're being pushed from above. conviction rates are going up, but then so are the amount of allegations Right, so then this is the crux of it. And the question is: are conviction rates increasing faster than allegation rates?
/r/MensRights10/10/16 10:38 AM
1

I presume you meant "would" there... I don't disagree with you. Our best attempt to create a fair judicial system will of course get it wrong sometimes. My point is that our judicial system is being intentionally skewed by feminist narrative at the expense of that fair system. My point is that the deliberate skewing is causing the system to get it wrong more often in only one direction (i.e. more wrongful convictions). I'm not complaining that the system isn't perfect. I'm complaining that it is…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 10:35 AM
1

Optimism isn't a bad thing. And I'm sure that changes (such as anonymity for the accused) will be very welcomed, if/when they arrive. But I fear that the trend is that things will get worse yet. With rising conviction rates and, more recently, misogyny being categorised as a hate crime, it seems to me that the direction being pushed for from above is one that panders to feminist hysteria.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 08:46 AM
1

That was not a fictional example.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 08:33 AM
2

I realise that you said within the past year, but I can't find much about 2016. The CPS report from last year, however, shows that various conviction rates were rising, and more so than the previous year. I would be interested to know if you have any reason to believe that this year is bucking that trend so severely to the extent that they are now falling.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:20 PM
1

Right. "Evidence"... So, the "victim" gets their life-long best friend to insinuate talk about how she witnessed the "victim"'s character changing over the years. Her uncle (who jointly plotted to take the guy's house and kids) takes the stand to talk about how the guy admitted beating her "on many occasions" to him. Now you've got your "evidence"...
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:16 PM
2

the innocent until proven guilty style justice system isn't perfect, but it's the best it can be. The idea is sound, yes. But the criminal courts (in the UK, at least) do not operate on purely an "innocent until proven guilty" basis, which is the problem. As I say, why are conviction rates rising? Seriously -- think about if for a minute! Try to give me a reason that doesn't involve the undermining of the principal of "innocent until proven guilty"! the guilty will get off scott free and the inn…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:10 PM
3

The fact of the matter is, as others have said, people get away with crimes all the time. And people also get away with making false alterations all the time, too. Like you say, the courts are not infallible.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 12:34 AM
7

should Indeed. Only, I know first hand that criminal courts (in the UK, at any rate) base their decisions on probability and that their perception of what likely did or did not happen is based on a parties ability to a) craft a narrative (which is easy to do when the authorities are just gagging to hear about reports of abuse), and b) sit in the gallery putting on fucking crocodile tears...
/r/MensRights09/10/16 12:31 AM
60

Having had first hand experience of our criminal justice system and also of having had false allegations made against me (for financial gain, in my ex's case), I am way more inclined to believe that a "not guilty" verdict really, really means that. Frankly, I have no faith that guilty verdicts can be trusted now... You only have to ask yourself why conviction rates for, e.g., domestic violence against women are rising to see the problem. I mean, what is a reasonable explanation for that?
/r/MensRights09/10/16 12:23 AM
1

The far, far more pertinent question, with respect to furthering an understanding of our species, is why do so many of them bay for it?
/r/MensRights09/10/16 12:15 AM
6

A more reasonable guy will just start packing his bags (or her bags), and maybe get an AVO. Right. And then 3 months later, when she wants his house, she tries to blackmail him. And when he refuses to give it to her, she takes his children away from him and reports him to the police...
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:34 AM
3

Except for the lack of casual rape in Frozen (and so many other TV shows and films).
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:27 AM
3

That is disgusting. What an absolute disgrace, that our Crown Prosecution Service can put out such a grossly biassed document. This is open contempt for men, and the favouring of women (unless you can also point me to an equivalent "Violence against Men and Boys (also inclusive of Women and Girls)" document). Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 11:34 PM
1

IANAL, but I would start considering everything you do through the eyes of a court. Start considering how they will see the whole situation, and presume that your ex will spin everything. (Hell, mine flat-out lied through her fucking teeth to try to take my kids and my house.) First thing, though, is to move out. Get your own place. Seriously. You can not expect a court to take you having custody of your children seriously unless you are seen to be a perfect, functional father. A mother is presu…
/r/MensRights06/09/16 12:51 AM
9

Oh yeah, it’s the misogynists! Forgot where I was for a min! Look no further. This is the reason. What's particularly interesting, though, is that you posted that (quoted) comment as an update. So the original downvotes must have been because people got the impression from your initial response that you might be the kind of person who oversimplifies the world (to the point where what you portray is no longer representative). That would be my guess, anyway.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 04:03 PM
2

Really? Is that true? So they have a "world" (women's only) emoji day, but don't even recognise father's day?
/r/MensRights19/07/16 08:04 AM
12

Babies are a social construct.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 07:20 AM
3

I can not voice how right you are. Seriously. I just tried, and have written, rewritten and rewritten again my response, but it's just too personal and -- even 2 years on -- I don't think I'm actually ready to talk about it yet... The big problem with the current system is that it incentivises the parties to try to take custody of the children. A parent who comes away with a lion's share of the care of the children, is going to receive large sums of child maintenance from the other, is very like…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 10:06 AM
5

We have to assume the parent post is /s. Or our brains would melt.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 08:28 AM
7

This Skeptorr video really put the scale of the bias in the family courts in perspective for me.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:06 PM
1

By the time I got out, my ex had become really unpleasant, and she got nastier still after I left her. She tried to blackmail me to get my house and extort money from me using our kids and, ultimately, she had me arrested, took the kids and tried to shaft me in the small claims court. After 9 months, I finally got my kids back and, a year and a half on, I'm just about to get the house. She's trashed our kid's lives, and gained nothing whatsoever. It's been awful. But I'll give you some advice, i…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 09:49 AM
5

I actually laughed out loud when I read: But Mrs Morris was ruled to be "a sensible woman" who was "probably in need of emotional and psychological comfort" during her own spending sprees.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:12 AM
1

He's so bang on the money with who his fan-base are. Disenfranchised left-wingers, for whom there is no longer a regular, liberal voice on the left to represent them. Everyone I know who is interested in and follows MY fits that category.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 03:36 PM
2

Makes sense!
/r/MensRights07/01/16 08:21 AM
3

I dunno. I tend to ascribe it to a disproportionately inflated sense of entitlement, myself. How they got to that, though, is another story...
/r/MensRights10/12/15 01:22 AM
4

Meh, it lost me at "don't be so bossy..." which, admittedly, was the opening dialogue. Girls tend to be more bossy than boys (or, at least, that's my experience of them -- and I have a daughter), so it would stand to reason that they'd head that more! Just cause you hear it more, doesn't mean it isn't justified! Stop assuming evening is (and blaming everything on) sexism!
/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:44 AM
3

Very relevant, thank you.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:39 AM
18

I genuinely believe these groups have the power to do a lot of good So does any group, and especially those with power. The problem here isn't that the group with power isn't doing good, it's that an unelected, self-appointed, ideological group has so much power to push it's particular agenda.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:24 AM
32

That fracture can also sometimes be the first step to mending a very broken relationship as well. Especially if it's family. OP: Good on you for speaking up.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:22 PM
2

I didn't read the parent post as having anything to do with "fairness". Rather, it was a statement of simple logic: A situation in which one gender is advantaged is not one in which there is gender equality.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 09:43 AM
11

Or more to the point, forced fatherhood. And, possibly more seriously, forced deprivation of fatherhood.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 02:36 PM
1

As I keep being told... stay strong. Actually, I keep thinking that, regardless of what happens, at least they'll grow up knowing how hard I fought for them.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 12:46 PM
2

Because we're talking about acceptable behaviour. If sex with a minor is legally acceptable for one gender, but not the other, then we have a gender-based (i.e., sexist) double standard in law. Are you ok with that (serious question)?
/r/MensRights04/06/15 12:32 PM
7

I think that this really only illustrates what an ill-defined concept "patriarchy" is for feminists. It's basically so vague that it can be blamed for anything and everything. The worlds a dangerous place? Patriarchy. You don't always feel happy? Patriarchy. Your parcel's not been delivered on time? God damn it, patriarchy!
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:54 AM
2

Infantilization?
/r/MensRights30/04/15 02:46 PM
3

I'm sure I hear Warren Farrel saying that the difference in average pay between those that work 35 and 40hrs per week is something like 100%! So this "working hours gap" would probably account for the bogus "pay gap" almost in its entirety.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:31 PM
42

I was thinking that the company who didn't hire here are probably now thinking, "phew -- that was a close one -- good call, HR!"
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:14 PM
38

It's not just your anecdotal experience.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:12 PM
1

Guy's a genius! It's worth watching this whole set, but this section at the end on marriage is great!
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:58 AM
8

Record all calls and all interactions between yourself and her, and any 3rd party (police, etc) regarding the incident.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 08:45 AM
1

I'm thinking he was trying to illustrate a point. And he did it rather well. The ease with which the protester resorts to violence and the freedom with which she does is astounding. Switch the genders. Can you imagine the response to a male protester behaving like that to a female trying to provoke them?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 02:25 PM
4

You can certainly ask the police why they arrested you. It will say on your charge sheet, and they are obliged (I believe) to show you the officer's note book in relation to the arrest. If say that it is "policy" (which is what happened to me), you can ask for a copy of the policy under the Freedom of Information Act (they wouldn't give me a copy). Such a policy is likely in conflict with PACE Code G. If this is the case -- and I've yet to find out in my case -- the arrest was likely unlawful an…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:22 PM
3

You have to remember that at the time of arrest there were only allegations. Both parties are no more than innocent witnesses, at that point. Taking a statement from one in a calm, respectful manner, and then arresting the other (which is a traumatic experience, as I know) and taking a statement under duress is a stone's throw from witness intimidation.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:12 PM
1

Thanks! :o)
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:04 PM
5

Hi. Can you link to sources? Not doubting -- just collecting info. :)
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:49 PM
2

There's this on 38degrees as well that could do with some love/support! https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/protect-children-s-right-to-see-daddy-s
/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:54 AM
3

Signed, and donated.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:40 AM
2

Perhaps the term feminist is outdated? I think you're right on the money there (where the majority people that use the term passively are concerned, at least). It meant that we needed to be aware of, and advocate for, everyone's rights and issues - including men. Yeah, a lot of people seem to think that, as if it's a "default" we've all been brought up with. And I've often heard the dictionary definition of feminism being used to support that feminism is about equality. But this is demonstrably …
/r/MensRights23/02/15 07:50 PM
1

Chin up, mate. :o)
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:25 PM
6

Why do you identify as a feminist then, rather than an equalitarian? What's so wrong with men that you don't identify as someone who also cares about their issues? [serious question -- I know it comes across as a bit challenging, but I wanted to ask it! :) ] edit: typo
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:20 PM
1

I'm completely fine with that joke. Me too. For the same reasons. Of course, if the genders were flipped, the Internet would be bursting with rage. And this is the problem, isn't it? We've ended up in a society where one sex is revered and beyond criticism (even as a joke). And the fact that we can take a joke just allows the problem to continue.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter