ea7e Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. Your links are not even in the ballpark for reason It's ironic that you're claiming I'm not here for "honest debate" given the response to me that has involved either insults or trying to come up with excuses to dismiss everything I said. These are all cases of violent attacks by men against women where they avoided jail. The specifics are different, but they're no less severe. Some are more severe. The reality here is it doesn't matter what I say, it's been made abundantly clear that not a sing…	/r/MensRights	23/04/24 01:33 PM
1	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. Oh hey, another person trying to dismiss a series of violent attacks by men against woman not resulting in jail because they aren't exactly the same as the story here. The fact is that violent crimes against others regularly avoid jail if there isn't a significant prior history (this woman had none) or severe injury, such as disability, or death. There is nothing unique about this specific case and if you all try to insist there is, all you do is alienate anyone not already in agreement with you…	/r/MensRights	23/04/24 08:29 AM
1	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. this is not a grammar sub nor are people here jorden petersons. and i have a feeling that you came to this sub for an argument. No, I came to this subreddit because it showed up on r/all. I commented because there was blatant misinformation at the top of the comment section. its not a sub filled with misinformation. If this is my first impression (at least right now, I've probably looked at the subreddit a long time ago at some point), then why would I keep looking. This is exactly what I mean. …	/r/MensRights	23/04/24 07:38 AM
1	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. No, just because there isn't a story exactly matching this one doesn't change the point. Both men and women regularly avoid jail for violent crimes. The fact that not a single person here will acknowledge this just shows people are more concerned with being right than actually advancing this issue. So again, if you want to maintain the terrible reputation this issue has outside of space like this and not actually help men facing various issues, then keep doubling down and attacking anyone who po…	/r/MensRights	23/04/24 12:08 AM
1	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. If I do that, you're going to find some other minor detail to dismiss it. When not a single person in the comment section is willing to even consider anything I'm saying at a certain point it tells me that they never will do that no matter what I say. My first example was a man with prior convictions choking a woman, something that kills people, and still not getting jail time. That's arguably even worse than this case. Yet not one single reply even acknowledged that. Again, if you just want a b…	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 10:24 PM
0	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. They do not differ significantly. They are all cases where men violently assaulted women and got lighter sentences. The original link also differs from the one in this post in that that person had priors while this woman didn't. If I posted that in a feminism subreddit and claimed no woman would avoid jail for that crime you and others would rightfully criticize that as false. But if you brought up this story I could similarly try to dismiss it by saying that it was because that person had prior…	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 09:55 PM
0	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. Yes, I agree that all these cases of men avoiding jail for violent assaults against women are not identical in every single way to this story. At this point I could post a story of a man smashing a glass in a woman's face in a bar and people would reply "actually, that was a wine glass not a beer glass".	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 08:09 PM
1	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. It's pretty clear at this point that most people here don't want any comments that diverge from total agreement, but here's something to consider. Imagine you're someone coming into this post with no opinion one way or the other on the general issue of differences in sentencing. You see the top comment claiming that men never avoid jail for violent crimes against women. You then google it and find dozens of examples of men avoiding jail for violent crimes against women in the country being discu…	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 06:49 PM
-36	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. Correcting misinformation is not "trolling". The top comment here claimed if the roles were reversed, the man wouldn't avoid jail. There are endless examples showing that's not the case. Both men and woman avoid jail in the U.K. for violent crimes against the other gender, depending on various factors.	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 03:49 PM
1	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. If there had been risk of serious injury with the choking it would have been mentioned. That's not how choking works. Many people who killed someone this way did not intend to. And you still haven't understood what you're even arguing against: that a similar story to the OP couldn't happen with the genders (plural) reversed. I gave a similar story. You dismissed it.	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 02:05 PM
1	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. hibristophiliac So now you're trying to downplay a violent crime against a woman by claiming it's because she's attracted to that. And the severity of a little bruising And downplaying choking, something which can and has killed people. That's not to say he shouldn't be behind bars, all three attackers in question should. Sure. But that's not what I replied to. I replied to a claim that men would never avoid jail for violent crimes like that. They regularly do.	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 01:54 PM
0	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. You specifically stated this phenomenon is "not unique to women". I did not make any claim about a "phenomenon". Notice how you've added that term yourself since it's not part of my quote? You're misrepresenting the point I made to argue against it. That's definition strawman. I never made a claim about any systemic "phenomenon" (your word). I replied to a claim that suspended sentences for violent crimes like this are unique to women with multiple counterexamples disproving that claim. If someo…	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 01:53 PM
-3	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. The post never claims that it "never happens". It only suggests that gender is related to it, which data confirms. I didn't reply to the post itself here. I replied to a comment claiming that a man would never receive jail for a similar violent crime. That's obviously false and I've given multiple examples from the same city easily found through a web search. You gave anecdotal evidence I replied to someone using a single anecdote to make a general claim: that men would never receive jail for a …	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 01:41 PM
0	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. You can say the same about your example. Her forgiving her attacker doesn't change the fact that he's already shown a pattern of violence and is likely to attack again. Yet he was given a suspended sentence.	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 01:35 PM
-19	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. You specifically stated this phenomenon is "not unique to women". Because it's not, and I gave multiple cases backing that up. In another comment, you also framed this post as "spreading misinformation". Because it is misinformation to claim that a man would never get spared jail for a similar crime. I.e., the examples I gave of similar severity crimes where men were spared jail. Again, data is how you prove points. Obviously false claims like the above instead only hurt credibility because othe…	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 01:29 PM
-1	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. Oh hey, more insults and still no response to my actual point. It is not true that men never avoid jail for similar crimes. This is easily confirmed with the examples I gave and many others. Don't spread misinformation in the name of your cause, all it does is hurt that with respect to everyone else not already convinced.	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 01:24 PM
-4	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. One of my cases is a man choking a woman after having already been convicted for another assault and still not receiving jail. The other is of a man stabbing another person. These are clearly crimes of similar severity, and just the very first two hits from a web search. In example 1 the female victim explicitly forgave her attacker Exactly, various factors around the case are considered in sentencing. In the post from this article, factors considered were the woman having no prior record and ha…	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 01:22 PM
1	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. I replied to a single anecdotal example being used to try to claim that a man would never be spared jail with multiple examples of violent crimes from the same city where a man was spared jail, including one involving a stabbing. But thanks for the strange policing of a sub Hold yourself to a standard of not upvoting obvious misinformation if you don't want others "policing" you (i.e., refuting with evidence). I know reddit has a tendency to create echo chambers, but this is just embarrassing. F…	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 01:18 PM
-48	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. I'll give you the benefit of doubt and assume you're not a troll and are saying this out of ignorance rather than actual malicious intent. I didn't make any claim about overall sentencing rates, I replied to a claim that a man would never be spared jail for a violent crime like this with multiple examples of that happening. Overall data is how you prove things, not easily refutable claims based on single anecdotes.	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 01:16 PM
-7	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. It says everything that every reply here is trying to insult me personally rather than addressing the fact that men are also spared jail for violent assaults in some cases, like the two examples I've given from the same city. Insulting people who correct misinformation does nothing to help advance men's rights, it just creates the impression of bias to a wider audience.	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 01:07 PM
-8	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. What's the excuse here? The claim was a man wouldn't get spared jail for a similar crime. I gave two examples from the same city of men getting spared jail for violent assaults.	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 01:05 PM
-11	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. Good response. What about my comment above is incorrect? How does spreading misinformation like this help advance men's rights? This is clearly not a sentence unique to women. Ironic on a subreddit supposedly against discrimination that the response is to attack me based on where I'm from rather than address my point.	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 12:54 PM
-113	Woman, 39, who glassed a male pub drinker after he wrongly guessed she was 43 during light-hearted exchange is spared jail by female judge. Here's a man spared jail for assaulting another man and later for choking his girlfriend. Here's a man spared jail for a stabbing. Factors such as no prior record as was the case for this woman are also considered in sentencing. Edit: there are legitimate men's rights issues, but getting a suspended sentence for crime like this is not unique to women. Making claims off single examples rather than data and then downvoting counterexamples doesn't help advance this issue in general. Here's some mor…	/r/MensRights	22/04/24 12:28 PM