TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

eastindyguy Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by eastindyguy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That’s the way it should be, for all crimes (not just rape). The founding fathers believed it was better that a hundred guilty people go free than one innocent person be wrongly imprisoned. That is why the burden of proof is so high to get a criminal conviction.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/21 01:32 AM
4

$35000/year if lucky. Ex-wife is at least $80,000 in debt after getting her doctorate in social work, and makes that. When she only had her masters degree she was only making $27000/year. What's hilarious is that she has an associates degree in computer technology and was making around $30000/year 15 years ago when we first met.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 08:22 PM
1

But there are other things such as a damaged vagus nerve that doesn't allow people to know when they are full, metabolic diseases, thyroid conditions, un-diagnosed tumors of he pituitary or other glands, etc. Yes, it some ways it does come down to what you eat, but it is entirely possible for a person to not eat a well-balanced "healthy" diet without excessive calories and for them to still be obese. Unless a person is knowledgeable enough to know about the different options (low-carb, paleo, ve…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:23 PM
1

You need to do some reading on biological processes ad biology in general. Weight is determined by many things, not just what you eat. The same person can be given 2 diets, one with 1500 calories that is mostly carbs (even healthy carbs from fruits, vegetables, and nuts) and they will put on weight. Change the diet to 1500 calories, but it is lower carb and higher in protein and they will lose and eventually maintain a healthy weight.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:28 PM
2

Insurance is based on attempting to lower the average risk of a condition / event occurring per insured individual to a point where the cost of coverage can be inexpensively covered by the group as a whole. If there is something that is too expensive to cover for a given insured pool, the insurance company is generally free to drop coverage for that item. Cable subscription packages are forced onto cable companies by networks that say "unless you also carry channels X, Y, and Z you can't have ac…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:36 PM
0

Seriously, go read some books / takes some classes on how insurance works. The larger the pool of insured individuals, the better it is for everyone. You need to quit looking at it as each person's premiums only pay for their benefits - that's just not how insurance works. Never has, never will. Yes, some individuals cost more to cover when taken as an individual. But by placing everyone in a large pool, the costs for everyone go down. Yes, you may have to pay $.10/month more to cover someone el…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:27 PM
-1

You are correct, the item still costs $100,000. But if 1,000 people are paying to cover it, the cost per insured person is $100. If 5,000 are paying for coverage the cost is $20 per insured person. If 100,000 people are insured, the cost is $1 per insured person. That is what your premiums go towards paying. By spreading the risk/cost over a large enough pool of people the cost per an individual becomes miniscule.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:10 PM
2

Insurance is a completely different animal than cable television. There really isn't anything analagous between the two.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:05 PM
2

You are coming at this from a very naive perspective. If insurance worked the way that you wanted it to, your insurance would be much more expensive. Insurance only works when covered individuals are part of a large enough risk pool. Seriously, do some reading on how insurance works and you'll see why it can't work the way you desribe.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:38 PM
2

Preventing a pregnancy is a legitimate medical reason.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:29 PM
1

The individual in "individual health insurance" just means that you bought it yourself instead of through your employer. You are still being covered as part of the group of all insured individuals. You really need to do some reading on how insurance works. If you didn't pay into a pool that covers the costs of everyone, your rates would skyrocket and you would get less coverage for the items you did purchase insurance to cover.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:27 PM
1

I meant, that if you think you don't need insurance you are foolish. All of those things may be true, and you may be lucky and they hold true for you too. But it's the things you can't predict that you need insurance for. An example... My FIL is relatively healthy, but he had a wart on his finger and after he got it removed he visited his sister in a long term care facility and ended up getting MRSA in the wound. He ended up having to have bones removed which would have ended up costing close to…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:18 PM
3

You are foolish if you do not think you need health insurance (at any point in your life). You can't predict that you won't be in a major car accident, fall down the stairs, get diagnosed with cancer, etc. Insurance is like a condom... It's better to have it and not need it, than it is to need it and not have it. edit: added prenthesis to make my meaning clearer
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:45 PM
6

You just can't. Can you imagine the record keeping nightmare it would be for insurance companies if they were made to allow people to completely customize their individual policies. The system would grind to a halt, and premiums would skyrocket for everyone.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:11 PM
4

Because it's just how insurance works. The larger a group that pays to cover something, the less an insurance company has to charge everyone in order to pay benefits for it. If insurance was completely customized per gender, insurance would be much more expensive for everyone. By making policies gender neutral, everyone gets lower premiums. If only men paid for coverage of their health issues and women only paid for coverage of their health issues, everyone's premiums would probably go up by at …
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:08 PM
5

No, because If drugs were present they would have been found by the first x-rays or body cavity search. Everything after that was nothing but an excessive abuse of power by the officers aided by the physicians.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:46 PM
6

There's a fairly large continuum between 0% of core and 100% of core%. Yes, doing all of the work could result in less sex. But the reason could be that the man is just too tired at that point. The best study would be one in which the men were grouped according to the percentage of core housework they performed and then recording sexual frequency. It very well could be that doing 50% of the core housework results in having sex 8 times a month. It's a flawed study if they treat doing housework as…
/r/MensRights30/10/13 08:29 PM
18

This is how I count myself lucky. My ex-wife's mother kept her from her father as a little kid so when my ex and I divorced she insisted that we have equal parenting time (still bitched that the $125/wk was never enough CS though, and was still bat-shit crazy in lots of other ways too). When she got offered a job in a different state, she made sure to move to a school district that was on year round school so that my daughter could come home for 10-14 days every 6 weeks or so. I can't imagine ho…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 08:09 PM
3

Because at the top it says "For every 100 girls..." (forget the exact wording).
/r/MensRights08/10/13 03:29 PM
2

Then why did you say "that's not even my main problem with the stats"? That sentence means that you ARE complaining about the stats. So which is it, or are you just attempting to be a troll?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:26 PM
1

Really, do some research on the Duluth model of DV. How many times do you have to be told that this feminist model of DV has been used to shape legislation for decades despite the fact it has been proven to be woefully inaccurate, and gender biased against men.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:22 PM
3

Your problem with them is that they don't conform to your preconceived world view. Those stats come from peer reviewed studies, but I'm sure you'll say that the experts are less knowledgeable than you on the subject so they must be mistaken.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:32 PM
1

Cops aren't there to protect themselves. They are there to prevent abusers from abusing their victims, but due to the Duluth model of DV being the basis of most DV laws, they are forced to view all males as abusers and all females as victims. How is that not feminist theory being the cause? You really need to educate yourself on the Duluth model and how it has shaped DV laws over the years. Once you do, you will be sickened by it.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:28 PM
1

In my situation, even though I was the one with a knife wound and my ex was raving like a lunatic I was the one handcuffed. Despite all evidence pointing to me being the victim. It took multiple neighbors telling the police what happened before they released me and made her leave the premises. If the genders had been reversed, I would have been charged with assault or possibly attempted murder. Police should look to protect the victim based on observable evidence (that always exists in a domesti…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:13 PM
1

Find the name of her superior, and send them the video and what the prosecutor said to you. If that doesn't get a response, find that person's superior and send it to them. At that point, if you don't get a response you have the choice of either taking it to the media or just letting it go. If the media won't do anything, and you want to keep pushing it, then I would post it online and make sure to name all of the individuals that you contacted in the prosecutor's office about it. Make sure you …
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:42 PM
2

And with that, you prove what it unmitigated ass-hat that you really are. He knows he made a mistake, he's being responsible now, you're the one who needs to grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:15 AM
5

This was completely uncalled for. Yes, the OP made a mistake but he obviously recognizes that. Why not say something supportive instead of being an unmitigated ass-hat?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:59 PM
4

Congratulations! I was a 50% of the time single father (my ex is actually great in her belief that kids need both parents in their life - and she's a social worker for child protective services), myself. Being able to be significant part of your kids life is one of the most rewarding things ever. Now you just need to be prepared for the looks you'll get from people in public who still think any man who pays attention to kids (even if they are his) is a pedophile. Learn to ignore those people, an…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:57 PM
3

Because, Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:55 PM
0

Yes, it was severe. But if that is the punishment that the law calls for then she should face that punishment. Or are you advocating that she should be treated differently because of her gender? Until the punishments are changed to be less severe, she got the punishment she deserved.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:50 PM
5

So, you feel that we can't / shouldn't lament the fact that there are still people who are so mired in archetypical gender stereotypes that portray men and boys as sexual aggressors, and women and girls as helpless victims. We can't call attention to those that still "cheer on" when boys are assaulted / molested by older women? How can MRAs hope to change society's views about these things if we don't call attention to the illogical, sexist attitudes people have in regards to them. And if we can…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:46 PM
1

Really, what fucking part of the US do you live in? I travel routinely for work, to many parts of the US, and I don't see what you claim exists here. Advertising (and most media in general) is aimed primarily at women. Women are depicted in positive ways, such as being caregivers, educators, (sole) parenting figure. Women are the focus of the majority of educational programs. Women are the focus of most public health programs. How are men depicted positively in media? I can't recall, I can't rem…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:43 AM
5

But for the women where abortion isn't the right answer there is still the option of giving up the child for adoption or abandoning it at hospital or police station (legal in many states). So in effect, women have the right not only to a physical abortion but also to a financial abortion after the child is born. Why are women afforded the right to financially abort a child by abandoning it or putting it up for adoption, but men are not given the same right?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:46 PM
4

As a group gets larger, gaining a consensus on any one things becomes increasingly difficult. A group of 2 can come to a consensus easily, 3 slightly less so. Each individual you add makes it more and more difficult until you get to a situation like we face in the US, where 30% of each "side" isn't going to agree with anything the other side would agree with and the middle 40% is left making the tough decisions that affect everyone.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 04:10 PM
1

Really, people expect anything a feminist like that says to make sense or be consistent in any way shape or form?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 01:38 PM
26

Well, yes. The (now dead) men would have the privilege of not having to work, while the women had to labor to shove the bonbons into their faces. Isn't that a textbook example of the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:32 PM
2

But you hardly ever hear someone say, "I am a rape/sexual assault survivor". The women I have known who have gone through that also said "I was raped/assaulted". The use of the word survivor in that context typically occurs in print, so how it rolls off the tongue is of no consequence.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:07 PM
1

How about "a person who has been raped" or "experienced being raped". There are a lot of other ways it can be expressed instead of survivor or victim.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter