| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | My Eyes Were Assaulted, So I Thought I Would Share The Love | easyst17 | /r/MGTOW | 13/02/15 04:38 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Religious ExemptionYeah I have to say classic hypergamy on this one. I would be careful about huge, religion-level changes at an early stage though man. You will have changes in perception, but keep in mind 'God' is a very easy go-to for 'why'. If she were Wiccan she would probably say it was because of a new moon. Or because she needed to 'find herself.' Her excuse for why she left is just an excuse. | /r/MGTOW | 02/04/15 04:16 AM |
| 1 | Deciding between RP and MGTOWHere is a video that may help you, it certainly did for me. what the pua's don't tell you | /r/MGTOW | 13/02/15 04:44 PM |
| 7 | Rolling Stone retracts UVA rape storyActually my response was pretty unbiased. All I am asking for is one shred of evidence that she may be telling the truth. Anything that might counter the fairly decent case the lawyer of the frat has put together. She needs only create reasonable doubt that she is lying. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/14 01:00 AM |
| 7 | Rolling Stone retracts UVA rape storyI know! Even the major news networks are talking about how this 'hurts women who really have been raped' and they don't even stop to consider what effect this has on men, relationships greater society, or the moral implications of women being able to point her finger and having the entire country white knighting for her. I wonder if there be any real reflection on this by journalists, it almost feels like they will just press the next case that much harder. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/14 11:58 PM |
| 9 | Rolling Stone retracts UVA rape storyIn order to believe she in not a liar I at least need some part of her story to be on the level, and there does not seem to be a single part of her story that is corroborated by the facts. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/14 11:48 PM |
| 8 | Rolling Stone retracts UVA rape storyThose lawyers are going to remain deployed for quite some time, someone is getting sued. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/14 11:45 PM |
| 22 | Rolling Stone retracts UVA rape storyThe journalist didn't follow any of the usual ethical reporting guidelines because the reporter 'thought the accuser was credible' and that is good enough for the fine 'journalists' at rolling stone. They said that they didn't speak with the accused men because it isn't customary to follow up with the accused in criminal cases, however, this wasn't a criminal case because the accuser never went to police and as such it is really just her word. After reading through a few articles, it appears she… | /r/MensRights | 05/12/14 11:42 PM |
| 71 | This. This so much.I want to subscribe, yet I feel like it would be a terrible choice for my blood pressure. | /r/MensRights | 15/11/14 03:56 PM |
| 8 | This. This so much.Yeah, the logic of a bunch of feminists looking to someone who we rely on for high levels of innovation and creativity and telling them, 'Conform' is entirely beyond me. I guess they must be thinking, 'Maybe if we push enough men to not want to do a thing for society or anyone in it, women will finally start making the choice to get into stem fields' | /r/MensRights | 15/11/14 03:54 PM |
| 2 | Continental CEO’s ex-wife to appeal $1 billion divorce settlement, just not enough.So why can't this serve as a warning for others? And have you not heard of no-fault divorce? Works both ways | /r/MensRights | 14/11/14 08:39 PM |
| 2 | Continental CEO’s ex-wife to appeal $1 billion divorce settlement, just not enough.Too much is never enough | /r/MensRights | 14/11/14 08:35 PM |
| 1 | Can someone please explain #NotAllMenThanks for getting back to me. I searched up the thread because what I presume was a feminist on youtube responded to me with #notallmen as well as some other derogatory hashtags. As I avoid twitter like the plague (because it is) I had no clue what she meant and all the internet searches and examples in context did not really give me any help. I agree with your point, it just bothers me because I live close to an area considered to be a bastion of feminism, they have complained, a lot (really a… | /r/MensRights | 08/11/14 04:33 PM |
| 1 | Can someone please explain #NotAllMenBut when you talk about a rapist or a domestic abuser, women could just say, rapist or domestic abuser, instead they say men, inclusive of the person they are talking to if they get the 'not all men' response. Isn't that just a sideways shaming tactic? | /r/MensRights | 08/11/14 06:54 AM |
| 1 | Can someone please explain #NotAllMenSo wait, this is on our side? This must not have gotten very far off the ground then, but thank you, this really needs to be at the top. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/14 06:50 AM |
| 1 | Can someone please explain #NotAllMenYeah I have never seen this used as argument, but then the feminists say they get it a lot, and the only logic place I could see it coming from is a gender flip on NAWALT | /r/MensRights | 08/11/14 06:46 AM |
| 1 | Can someone please explain #NotAllMenI know right, and no real delineation on what the difference is, and WE'RE the asshole for not figuring it out, wtf? | /r/MensRights | 08/11/14 06:44 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter