TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ecarolus Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by ecarolus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Apologies. Answered the wrong person
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:30 PM
1

:) hehehe. There nothing like a good ol swearing to ease the burn. Have another go. This time don't swear like a child.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:02 PM
14

There are pee cups for women. They can do it latrine style. They tend to go in groups, hogging the place and slowing things down for other women with make up and god knows what else. They have smaller bladders but then they have smaller stomachs and drink less.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 10:14 PM
1

Bwhahaha. There's the ad hom and slander. Socrates ~ When the debate has been lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 08:22 PM
1

"I literally said we have a very vague account of one person's testimony." I literally did not say you are guilty of that. Correct? Post my exact words where I said you are. If you cannot, then no need to mention this ever. Also, the vagueness has nothing to do with my question What I did say was that you are not talking of the woman exactly how you talk of the man. Remember your words where you speculated the man as the guilty one? Now, are there words of yours, in this conversation thread betw…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 06:43 PM
0

So you cannot not post evidence that you specifically spoke of the woman in the same manner you spoke of the man? Thanks for proving my point. Here is the meaning of neutral What neutral really means "Not helping or supporting either side in a conflict, disagreement, etc.; impartial."
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:58 PM
1

Proponents of feminism do say feminism is equality. So it isn't then if you are correct. Which is it?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 01:24 PM
1

Let's make this super simple then. Can you or can you not post evidence that you specifically spoke of the woman in the same manner you spoke of the man?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:42 AM
0

"I'm not speculating one side lol." Post evidence that you specifically spoke of the women just like you spoke of the man. For example "We don’t know if the dude actually did rape her though. There are too few details. It’s possible she helped him back to the apartment then he forcibly had sex with her while he was drunk." There the man is made the perpetrator. Do you speculate the women as perpetrator too in the thread we are responding to? Just like you did with the man, no mental gymnastics o…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 08:34 PM
0

"I literally just said that her words were vague enough that none of us actually knows what happened." True. However this is not my point. My point is you made a speculation with the man being in the wrong and did not bother to see if the women could also be in the wrong. So to make a speculation than say we have not info is a bit hypocritical? If you did speculate that the women. Is in the wrong, please copy and paste your words where you try to be unbiased and speculate on both sides of what c…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 04:37 PM
2

I said that some feminists said a drunk woman cannot consent within the context of this story. In other words, if a man takes a so stupidly drunk woman home that she cannot even walk, then label the situation the next day as HER taking advantage of him, it will be labeled as assault (of the woman) by the feminist brigade. About feminists, I've seen more than enough on the feminists reddit section to confirm my suspicion.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 09:49 AM
1

According to the the poster above you being drunk means nothing to tour physical ability. Kinda makes me rethink rape case with drunk girls.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 04:43 AM
3

Feminist logic says that a drunk women cannot consent. EVER. But when a man is drunk we can put blinkers on because hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 04:38 AM
-1

Well bruh, your own words indicate you being suspicious of the guy having possibly done something to the girl. I don't see you push the idea that the girl having done something just as hard... Even when saying there aren't enough evidence, you show bias. So when your speech is only about the possible actions of the guy and not the female, think how it appears to people reading it.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 03:56 AM
-2

Nope, I'm not assuming malicious woman. I'm just pointing out that it could have gone the other way as opposed to what you give us Then you make me guilty of the thing you are busy doing... Hinting at the man being the culprit but aren't unbiased and play with the idea that the female is the culprit at all. At least consider both scenarios and not side with one. Am I unfair to ask for that?
/r/MensRights08/01/20 07:25 PM
6

She also could have lied. Remember the feminist Mantra. Drunk people cannot consent. Remember, he could not walk. So he was most likely blind drunk and she could have cowgirled him all night long. But it seems like when men are drunk people suddenly become more critical of the situation.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 05:08 PM
2

Hold on. You logic and assumption is wrong. A. Where does the op say the problem is on reddit specifically? B. Even if reddit, what makes you think that it is men shitting on men on reddit? Because of correlation? That an assumption based on stats but still and assumption. A female i know attended a meeting of mostly men and said to me the attendants were rude to her. Turns out the minority of women were rude to her not the men.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 03:58 PM
58

I've been banned from quora by pointing this out to feminists. 90% of the feminists I dealt with absolutely do not want to hear or deal with female on male DV or male suicide. If I point it out I am labeled as a women hater. No explanations given. 48 hrs later my comment is deleted and a strike from quora.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 05:15 AM
1

Fair enough. I wasn't expecting you to reply. I corrected what you said. Which is my job done. You could also just ignore it like I do when someone bumps a thread. Like you can ignore this post right now and I probably won't post again.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 08:26 AM
0

Or just delete you comment if you don't want people to respond to it? Lol
/r/MensRights07/01/20 08:06 AM
1

You mean toxic femininity?
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:29 AM
1

I think she meant it. Feminism is not about making boys happy.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:27 AM
2

It was never about equality (for men and women) It was about upliftment of women only. Why? It is in the name. WOMAN'S right movement.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:26 AM
1

Not at all. If I call a black person a racist and they complain about then they are they racist by default because of complaining about it? Seems so. Just using your illogical logic...
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:14 AM
1

Feminism is about equal rights FOR WOMEN. It is literally in the name. WOMAN'S right movement...
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:08 AM
1

, I realized that men are the offenders by an overwhelming majority. Wait till you see all the handbags of women taking up space. Where I come from women put their feet up on the seat by an overwhelming majority.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 10:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter