TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ecstaticfenatic Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by ecstaticfenatic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The following is NOT red pill (does not conform with evolutionary realities regarding men and women): "It's acceptable for men to sleep around with as many other women as they want while in a committed relationship. But women can't!" The following IS red pill (conforms with evolutionary realities regarding men and women): Men cheating = a serious crime that most women find enraging. But relationships can definitely survive a man cheating. Because men can have sex with women that they have zero r…
/r/RedPillWomen18/10/23 08:49 PM
15

Let's keep this red pill. "I can't find anyone that wants to marry me" General translation: "There are thousands of men that would happily marry me, but none of the top tier men that I'm into want to marry me". There is nothing wrong with aiming for the top. But when aiming for the top, red pill women know the following laws: Do not conflate sexual attention with romantic attention. The older you get, the larger the age gap you should be willing to accept, if you want an exceptional men. Because…
/r/RedPillWomen18/10/23 08:34 PM
2

"human traits are not randomly distributed" Who is arguing they're not? Again, barring input errors, which I included in my initial comment, and that the creator brings up regarding the bifurcated data inputs, the aforementioned list still holds true. Here it is again. The percentage of men in America that are 6'0 tall, not obese, make 70k or more per year, and that are single, is less than 1%. Fewer than 1% have all of these traits in common. Now, you may go right ahead and argue that "well tal…
/r/RedPillWomen16/10/23 08:39 PM
6

That is absolutely not what the calculator states for the stats I listed. OP was more selective about either income or race.
/r/RedPillWomen16/10/23 08:26 PM

Lol. Wanting a woman that hasn't been dicked down by 20 other men, isn't obese, and not wanting to raise Tyrone or Chad's child is... unrealistic... Did you think before posting this?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:53 AM
34

This is incorrect. The calculator makes no statistical mistake that you've pointed out, whatsoever. What you really mean is that it is in defiance of how YOU think it should be interpreted. For example: Less than 1% of men of all races between the ages of 24-29 are 6 feet tall, not obese, not married, and make 70k or higher. Barring input errors, that's a fact. Your observation of it is that it ignores co-occurrences. If anything, the calculator is far more damning than most women think. Why? Be…
/r/RedPillWomen16/10/23 01:37 AM
46

On the surface, it seems WILD that only 1 in 100 American men between the ages of 24-29, including all races, meet the following standards: Not married 6 feet tall Not obese Earns 70k or higher But when you consider each point one by one, it makes total sense: <15% of the male population is 6 feet tall. This is a known fact. So when women say "gotta be 6 feet", they instantly vaporize 85% of male prospects. About 35% of American men in this age range are obese. And far fewer are actually fit. An…
/r/RedPillWomen16/10/23 01:28 AM
19

You can find a man that will be willing to provide for both of you, but that also does not want kids, or, is okay with not having kids. However, for a large portion of men, you not wanting kids significantly decreases your value in the dating market. Conversely, for a minority of men, this phenomenon increases your dating market value. It is hard to know the exact number, but most sources seem to suggest that 80% of men want children. So be on the hunt for the 20% of men who don't want kids. Tre…
/r/RedPillWomen15/10/23 09:18 PM
2

Respectfully, you're wrong. That's a correlation fallacy. Correlation is not causation. Educated & wealthy men are more likely to be around other educated and wealthy women. So of course they're more likely to marry them. It does not necessarily follow that their education matters "A LOT". When polled in scientific ways, across scores of countries & across many decades, the polling always reveals the same. And education polls similarly: Men only consider financial prospects in women to be a marg…
/r/RedPillWomen02/10/23 08:12 PM
10

In general, I think the red pill space gets caught up too much on the body count. Men do not know your body count. They suspect it, based off of your behaviors. Being "easy", showing off your body, tattoos, extreme alcohol use, masculine behavior... whether accurate or not, men look at these things and assume a more promiscuous woman. My point being: having a high body count will not disqualify you from a high value man. INDICATING that you have a high body count, will. Observe (likely) virgin o…
/r/RedPillWomen01/10/23 02:14 PM
8

"with a stripper who has a high body count" A terrible anecdote. Men are generally repulsed by strippers when considering long-term partners. Repulsed. I cannot think of a more daunting task for a man than to reveal to his family that he is marrying a former (or current) stripper. Now, if she's beautiful enough, will she still have options for a husband? Absolutely. But a "high value man", by definition, has many options. There's absolutely no reason why he would, perhaps 99% of the time, pick t…
/r/RedPillWomen01/10/23 02:08 PM
33

Yes, you still have potential. The good news is that any woman who's reasonably pretty can find a husband. The question is, what caliber of a husband? "High value woman" is a very subjective term. For the sake of discussion, let us say that a high value woman is defined as being in the top 10% of desirable wives By that definition, almost certainly, no. 27 year old women with high body counts are very, very, very unlikely to ever be in the top 10% of desirable wives. As to your question about be…
/r/RedPillWomen30/09/23 08:13 PM
4

Okay. Being a dude, here's my advice: (Caveat, this is advice about landing a high quality man, if your interests are pointed elsewhere, that's fine and that's your business, I'm talking LTR advice here) Spend NO MORE THAN, perhaps, 12 months improving everything about your feminine allure. Remember, we're talking things men care about. Looks, home etiquette, feminine charm. Do your hot girl walk each day. YouTube some homecare advice. Read old fashion books (like...hundreds of years old) about …
/r/RedPillWomen27/09/23 01:52 AM
3

How old are you? If you're, oh say, 18, it CAN make sense to wait some time to discover what kind of man you're able to romantically (not sexually) attract and retain. And improve yourself in very key ways (assessing your manners, maximizing your looks) If you're still the blue pill woman definition of "very young" (23, 24, 25, 26), you should very much question your mindset here. In general, women saying "to get ready" for a relationship is often times a euphemism for "improving things about my…
/r/RedPillWomen27/09/23 01:29 AM
2

No.
/r/RedPillWomen23/09/23 08:13 PM
5

Most men barely give a damn about a woman's socioeconomic upbringing. It's very, very, very low on the list of priorities. Could it be a bonus if she comes from a wealthy family? I suppose? Maybe? A little? Particularly for the man in question because he comes from an affluent family. Put simply: Woman #1: comes from a wealthy family of doctors. Woman #2: comes from a family of mechanics. Is 10% hotter than woman #1. Most men will absolutely, positively, pick #2, and with little hesitation. Coul…
/r/RedPillWomen23/09/23 04:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter