TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

edbegley1 Archive

View 9 posts and 151 comments by edbegley1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

And he was only vindicated because they found contradicting text messages on her phone. This is very rare to be able to find something like that, and it's only these rare cases that are counted officially by police as "false rape accusations" that lead to the 2-8% figure that assholes misuse to claim false accusations are rare. Think about it. It's easy to see that the actual number of false accusations are much higher, it's a much bigger problem, but that falsely used statistic is used to downp…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 12:36 AM
4

How many people actually know what questions were asked and how the NISVS studies are put together? There's an almost aggressive lack of skepticism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 09:17 AM
210

And oddly, Western women will still argue vociferously that they are still so much more oppressed than men. It's become a core part of their identities by this point.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 03:30 AM
2

What field is that? Do they say outright they're looking to hire women first?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 10:06 AM
22

They will continue to want special scholarships, tutoring, job programs, business funding, etc., no matter how far ahead this societal privilege gets them, no matter how much more far ahead then men these get them. They will just have updated reasoning and will have come to expect that sort of thing. They will call men incels or misogynists for criticizing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 10:06 PM
9

https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2025/02/05/the_armys_special_treatment_of_capt_rebecca_lobach_1089352.html I haven't found mention of the flight recording yet but it does seem there was some gross preferential treatment here. It looks like the Air Force even waited for her family to delete all her social media before they mentioned her name.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/25 06:58 PM
18

Or, and hear me out... Being terminally online and addicted to social media gives these mostly Western women the hyperbolic impression that just about everything is misogyny. Called a bad name? Misogyny. A man disagreed with you and wouldn't kowtow to whatever dogma you're vomiting on him? Misogyny. And while this hyper-primed sensitivity probably does get exhausting, is is certainly not PTSD, and it's offensive to people who actually have PTSD. I just read Bad Therapy (great book) and people (l…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 09:40 PM
11

How dare those men work to provide for themselves and their families.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 09:19 PM
2

Lazy comment. Men and women both cheat.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 09:08 PM
2

So this ovarit is like an incel.is but for women? No sir, there is no femsphere.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/25 12:10 PM
18

No matter what you do or think, some of those people will always assume the worst motivations because you're a man.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/25 11:41 AM
2

Likewise 99% of the time someone complains abiut misogyny, it is not in a violent context. So... Ms. Ted talker is saying non-violent misogyny is bad and should be pushed back against, but non-violent misandry is not a big deal and we should shun anyone who points it out. What a disgusting human being. We just need to not treat others poorly based on immutable characteristics. That should not be controversial.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/25 03:18 AM
3

I think more awareness of real examples of misandry would make a difference. OP when you come across some of this stuff, r/everydaymisandry is a great place to put up a screenshot.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 02:59 AM
1

Your comment nowhere justifies treating regular men poorly because of their gender.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 02:51 AM
9

I doubt the men even know that they can call this helpline, especially considering the language is only towards women. But then ironically, women would probably find a reason to get upset if they did update the language to be more inclusive...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 04:12 PM
1

Listen and validate her, but if you hope for it to be reciprocal you're entitled and expecting emotional labor from her.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/25 12:18 PM
2

"But it's different"
/r/EverydayMisandry12/04/25 07:02 PM
7

The surge in misuse of words like of "objectification" and "fetishization" is just online brainrot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 12:18 AM
2

Did she spend most of her time on social media complaining about all the housework she's got to do?
/r/MensRights30/03/25 04:07 PM
0

Your post is absolutely something I could see a sales division posting regarding branching out into a new market, so yes, you're treating it like sales. But you're quibbling. Human relationships are not something to be treated like a marketing or business strategy or analyzed like this, and anyone trying to do that severely lacks the EQ to be in a healthy romantic relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 01:24 PM
0

Human relationships is not sales. It is not marketing or any other business discipline. That's all the substance I need here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 10:40 PM
5

Dude, your whole post is dystopic and further clarifies the decline of modern dating. People should just be real and quit wasting so much time online treating it like a pseudo sales job. I'm glad I've already got someone good.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 07:28 PM
20

And 90% of it is not justified by safety. It's often generalized resentment or even hatred towards the opposite sex. However, safety or fear is usually still provided as the justification. Much like other flavirs of bigotry in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 07:34 PM
25

The complete silence on this kind of thing from women's groups teaches me all I need to know regarding any true desire for equality. #showdonttell
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 11:27 PM
–

I guess so, double standards are fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 12:51 PM
–

This is incel/black-pill content and against the rules of this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 12:02 PM
–

Does that make it any less true?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 11:34 AM
–

We're both going by personal experience, neither of us have something to "show" here. You're hyper online, I see more empathy for the women. Weird imagined comments towards the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:25 PM
–

If we go just by violent crime statistics, men should be more afraid in public than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:24 PM
–

I guarantee you there is just as much if not more hate for the men. You got to recognize though that every situation is unique, and a lot of those men were pushed out or it was made extremely difficult for them to spend time with their kids. A lot of blame that can be spread around. A lot of people who weaponize the kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:13 PM
4

Not accurate and kind of sexist. But even for the men around 18-25 and slim, it's sexist. If you're repeating the idea that men need to just compete harder and impress the women better while the women just need to sit and pick what they like, then you're part of the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 06:41 PM
3

You're misrepresenting again.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 06:38 PM
3

You misrepresented what I said (that's common on this sub lol) - my point was you're normalizing the men having to compete with each other like peacocks to get a potential date's attention. It's not healthy. Instead of telling men "just put in more effort to impress her!", we need to tell them to meet women in person and not on these toxic dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 05:58 PM
3

This is why I'm glad I'm not dating any more - you're turning it into a job interview.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 03:41 PM
8

It's interesting because when someone mentions the rampant misandry on here someone always asks "well can you show some examples?" but then when you do show examples like on this sub, someone always invariably decides to "look" at your profile and they take a 5 second glance at your page and make a moral "oh guys don't take him seriously, i looked at his page and he's an incel" kind of judgment.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/02/25 01:44 PM
1

Because killing men is funny!
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/25 11:25 PM
38

Her name is Kristine Larson (she's a public figure folks so I can name her). She has a degree in Sociology, and led a group called "Equity on Fire" complaining that the LAFD is sexist and racist. Now she got what she wanted, is making $400k, and wants men to know that expecting someone to carry them out of a fire is misogynist.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/25 09:02 PM
13

The enslaved men in the picture probably brought it about themselves somehow or are somehow responsible for the situation they found themselves in.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 04:50 PM
5

I think you're still missing my point, that every time the fact that it's brought up that men are more likely to be victims of violence, someone always comes up with "but it's mostly at the hands of other men". At this point it's a whataboutism because it's not relevant - the stats of male violence victims are usually brought up to women who complain about themselves being much more in danger in public, merely to illustrate that no, you're not, and we should try to protect everyone more, men and…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 11:30 PM
1

If you read those studies, those are the ones with sufficient evidence for the police departments to mark them as false accusations. For a case to have sufficient evidence for this is rare. Ask any detective and they will tell you the majority of the time for any criminal investigation, they will archive it as "insufficient evidence". There is nothing out there showing false allegations as a whole are rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:47 PM
1

I'm curious if you have data for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:44 PM
8

I feel comments like yours try to deflect from the original point. When one says men are more likely to experience violence, we don't need to go into a debate about if they experience it from men or women more. It doesn't change the fact that they experience more violence because they are men. The gender of the perpetrator does not change this fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:40 PM
1

So many online women will say the most vile things possible about men in general, then invent phrases like "not all men" when a man says something about it. Or they're just "talking about lived experiences"... It was beaten over my head growing up that we need to treat each other as equals. Except more and more nowadays, these types of women are giving themselves every exception under the sun.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:36 PM
–

This sub is full of terminally online shut-ins, not sure why I'm still on here lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:29 PM
–

Let me guess, you're not in a relationship. This is literally 90% of couples at various times. A husband or wife can not be in the mood and still consent to having sex with a partner who wants it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 01:22 PM
–

It's certainly not rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 01:18 PM
–

"Enthusiastic consent" is yet another terminally online / blue-haired gender studies thing that is going to go away eventually. You're right, consent is black and white and is not always "enthusiastic". A couple who are both drinking and have a drunken hookup one or the other may regret the next day have not raped each other. When I'm tired but my wife is horny so I have sex with her, I may not have been "enthusiastic", but she didn't rape me. Two people on a TV show who don't verbally consent w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 01:17 PM
238

Thank god for Joey Swoll.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 12:13 AM
–

You literally live on here don't ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 01:43 PM
7

Saw this same horrible shit when these women learned Margot Robbie had a boy, wishing for "cot death" and shit like that. So vile.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/12/24 01:40 PM
7

And yet the media only talks about the "manosphere". These femsphere communities are often multitudes worse.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 01:36 PM
2

Co-opted by sexist women.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 12:49 PM
35

Men with SO's are called incels all the time LMAO
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:47 PM
20

Disclosure
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:55 AM
1

There is literally nothing proving "false accusations are rare". And I can probably confidently say that people like yourself who trot that phrase out to dismiss legitimate concerns are the ones who hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 11:56 PM
5

I'm heartened to see this upvoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 11:54 PM
0

No, they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 01:26 PM
3

Bluesky loves to brag about how much nicer they are, but then it's littered with bashing anyone remotely conservative.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 08:50 PM
1

Ask any cop - it is super rare for them to label a case as "false allegation" which is the source of the 2% number. Most of them, if there isn't sufficient evidence, they mark it as such, they close it, and it's not counted in that number.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 11:52 PM
1

Damn misogynist justice system.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 11:48 PM
16

Spot on - if it's "unrealistic portrayals" they're worried about with AI, those pulp Harlequin romances are just as bad.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 12:43 AM
2

Trafficking is bad, yes, but it's also extremely rare in porn. Ask any of these ladies for data and they'll link one or two stories. But it's blown massively out of proportion like so many of the issues they get riled up about. There is no data to suggest it's a widespread issue.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 12:41 AM
14

I disagree, more people need to see this side of the femsphere and stop pretending it's only men who do this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 01:42 PM
26

Said the hateful "blatantmisogyny" incel.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:00 AM
60

Great, the "fragile male feelings" crap is only going to be all over this site. I should probably stay off of here.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 12:58 AM
3

It's a subjective declaration. You are defending something you don't understand. "The probability is higher" is just the jury's understanding, and it's still "probability", not a declaration of guilt. Edit: she blocked me on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:43 AM
2

It doesn't. It was her word against his. Which is why she took it to civil and not criminal court. She was literally believed because of her gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:40 AM
5

"Preponderance of the evidence". I take it you don't understand what that means. That's why I said alleged. Civil court is not guilt. It is so far removed from "beyond the shadow of a doubt" it's laughable. You literally are believing her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:37 AM
7

You got examples from mensrights that weren't removed? Or more likely just hoping people believe you at face value? Twox, feminism, trollx... there is no moderation at all to stop male bashing. It goes on all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:34 AM
2

"Preponderance of the evidence" is an exceedingly low bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:32 AM
5

Alleged, by a civil suit. It's extremely common for male celebrities to have spurious sexual assault claims from certain types of people. Look up reputation risk insurance I'm sure you automatically "believe all women" though and cancel any man without further thought who's ever had this happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:29 AM
4

So a few college men are joining the millions of women who've been saying "kill all men" for years.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:21 AM
17

Absolutely we all know who will be drafted. And the women against drafting women will have some supremely back-asswards justification. "Well the women don't deserve to get sexually harassed!"
/r/MensRights11/11/24 01:11 AM
19

The only time I've ever seen it used on here is women using it in a derogatory manner. Yeah, real nice decent people.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 01:18 AM
9

Yes and there was no evidence bots got worse "honey".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 01:12 AM
8

No, the entire globe doesn't "know" that. I doubt you even looked at the accounts who commented and liked it. "Bots" where they exist are political propaganda. You still have provided no evidence for your claim here. It's just a way for you to convince yourself real women aren't saying this kind of thing, when they are in droves. Here - latest estimate as of 2020 was 15% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167404820300031. 15% is not a sufficiently large number to call the …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 01:01 AM
11

What is there to "know" about that. Do you have any evidence or do you just "know it in your gut". Because that's super intelligent. Also... OP mentioned tiktok, twitter, and reddit. But yiu didn't read it that closely.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 12:40 AM
25

Oh my god it's you lol. 28,000 likes are not "bots". There is no evidence that any of them are bots. You only want to believe they're bots because women are all angels in your estimation. Your first thought is "bots", probably because you're just parroting comments you saw elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 12:35 AM
8

Slight correction: so many of them are not traumatized in the least yet they have convinced themselves they are. All those man bad danger stories they share with each other literally give them PTSD! /s
/r/MensRights05/11/24 12:15 AM
11

Well there's at least 300k women on blatantmisogyny alone so I can guarantee they'd be making a fuss, and you wouldn't call them "chronically online" for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 12:00 AM
39

Yet if the genders were reversed you'd be joining in the outrage.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 10:04 PM
1

FINO's.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:24 PM
1

This was one of the most offensive TV segments I'd seen in a long time. But no mass blowback for it here, and we all know why.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:20 PM
6

About 5000 on the frontline out of over 500,000, so about 1%.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 06:32 PM
3

I heard it recently on NPR of all places - "almost half were women and children".
/r/MensRights30/10/24 06:29 PM
13

That's really nice 🙂, thanks for sharing the idea.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 12:05 AM
18

In the dictionary feminism is fighting for equal rights for women, not just to fight any and all women-specific problems so that they become a privileged class. So she's wrong. And fuck her for being so entitled and calling someone evil for not kowtowing to her. "It's for women!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/24 10:10 PM
85

So women wanting to get laid = empowerment. Men wanting to get laid = entitled, transactional, disrespectful.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/10/24 05:00 PM
0

That's ironic, because you already had your mind made up, which is why I said you're only interacting with me in bad faith. I could give you thousands of examples where they're not just "talking about their experiences". But you don't really care.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:14 PM
-1

You're giving this one example to represent all misandry. Not an honest or good faith take. None of your posts here are in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:53 PM
0

It's not, you're misrepresenting it and I suspect you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:38 PM
1

No, that's not most misandry online, not even close to accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 02:15 AM
10

Hey everyone, she's a Registered Nurse, she knows what she's talking about!
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/24 07:12 PM
6

Perfect.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 04:09 PM
1

Casual indignance is such a sport now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 06:09 PM
2

Do you have a citation for that because I hear women complain about that all the time. FFS your post history... you're a serial complainer yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:54 PM
1

Right on! Shut up about your preferences unless you're a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:41 PM
1

Yiu're giving me the example of one thread, and then getting your panties in a twist and calling me names lol. God this sub is full of losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:31 AM
1

No I didn't say men don't say that kind of thing. My favorite terminally online activity: reading imagined arguments into what people say.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:06 AM
1

I don't understand what you think these are supposed to prove in your mind... this is weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:30 AM
0

Does that study look at the prevalence? No, it's only examining the why and how specific cases, and the 4 or 5 ones mentioned are men. Not the mea culpa you thought it was. I swear this sub is full of idiots
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:26 AM
0

It takes examples from many women's subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:24 AM
1

r/everydaymisandry has a lot of examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:03 PM
2

I could say the same thing for online gossip groups where women air out all of their ex's dirty laundry to the public. They're shitty for doing that but I'm not going to generalize all women. Same thing. No, coming across men online doing things like that is not understandable for someone to then think "all men" are like that. That's silly as hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:29 PM
-2

Simply provide evidence for this, because you can't. Everything you say on this sub is completely made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:25 PM
1

Lol - I'm not going to waste my time finding it for you. If you truly frequented them as you say then you wouldn't be so huffy asking for examples, you'd know exactly what I mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:24 PM
0

Okay... then can you share it? Because I can't find it and I really think you're just repeating things you've heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:24 PM
-1

You're just repeating a lot of fringe examples to justify your generalizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:24 AM
2

It's not - this kind of generalizing is all over women's subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:21 AM
-8

There was no such "study" and there was not an epidemic of male morticians doing this ffs. Edit: downvoted by "purple pill debate" women who haven't provided a single study. Because this is just their sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:20 AM
-3

I knew I'd find some self-justifying misandrists on this thread lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:14 AM
69

Women's problems are society's problems and men's problems are for them to figure out themselves.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 09:23 PM
1

The real problem is millions of these types of women, they are only bothered when women are victims. I see time and time again on women's subs that there is an "epidemic" of violence against women, when women are maybe 20-25% of the victims. Those types of assholes need to be reminded that all violence is bad, and we should not just focus on reducing violence against women. We do not need special programs or extra funding to treat violence against women as the more important problem. Therefore 9…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/10/24 07:52 PM
14

Do you want to know the real answer? Because it genuinely takes an imbecile to believe that there is some magic utopian societal structure that would somehow erase our problems. They are the ones writing about these "utopias", so it doesn't surprise me there are still forms of slavery in so many of them. The writers are all morons.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/10/24 07:40 PM
13

I wonder what you're basing your second sentence off of. Was there a study or is that your most likely uninformed opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 10:56 PM
2

That's interesting - any good article talking about that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 09:56 AM
83

I don't like Mike Pence but that's one thing he was absolutely right about.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:20 AM
286

Somewhat similar - my car's battery was dead one night after the gym, probably 8:30. It's part of a strip mall and I saw probably 3 women walk to their car. I left them alone and got a jump from the first guy I saw. Not going to risk being treated like a potential predator or have the cops called because I'm a strange dude approaching women in the dark. After all, I'm not a bear.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:07 AM
23

They've grown up being told they are the only victims. It's a coveted status to them so they get irrationally upset when told otherwise. When r/mensrights was somewhat new, countless online women were offended just by its existence, not necessarily by any of the content, so now you have assholes using "MRA" as a slur against any man who dares to criticize a woman.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/10/24 12:05 AM
10

My wife for instance lol.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 12:14 PM
-12

Cute as hell, but I think here there's still some maturity that she has a chance of growing out of. The buzzwords she's throwing out are popular at the moment. Of course I'd probably hate to see her social media though... but I'd buy something from her onlyfans.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 11:10 PM
16

It's just more weaponized victimhood. And if you call them out on it, you're a "misogynist".
/r/MensRights30/09/24 02:08 PM
31

I was just arguing with someone about this. She trotted out the "b-but women attempt suicide more!" I know people who have attempted and committed suicide. If men are more successful it's because many more of them are more serious about it. Big difference between cutting yourself or taking a bunch of Tylenol and shooting yourself in the head. I'm tired of pussyfooting around about it, women that mention that as if it can be directly compared need to get their heads out of their asses.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 01:54 PM
1

Because they espouse equal rights, not female superiority.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 06:27 PM
1

Your mother's not a true feminist then.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:56 PM
19

Don't look up the circumstraint, not good for your blood pressure.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 10:42 AM
6

It's ironic because all over social media you have people saying "feminism is about men too becuz it's about equality", yet those same people get mad when someone like Gemma mentions becoming more inclusive of men.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 08:44 PM
4

Approximately 80% of all possible male behavior is now misogynist or "toxic masculinity" to someone.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 06:25 PM
20

"Believe all women."
/r/MensRights31/08/24 06:00 PM
32

This whole online men are predators thing is just boomer fox news illegal immigrant scaremongering in a different format. But they lack the self-awareness to notice it.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/24 04:17 PM
2

So many women on this video absolutely triggered and enraged that more guys are talking about them merely paying for themselves 😆
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 06:51 PM
1

They don't - the numbers in the 3 cited studies above explicitly only count the cases where the police conclusively could prove innocence. And we know for the majority of cops, once they drop charges, they're move on to the next one. That's why there are so many vague "insufficient evidence" cases. Interestingly, there are countless women's groups that presume every single one of those "insufficient evidence" cases are in fact guilty rapists who are getting away with it. Who's got the bias here?
/r/MensRights01/08/24 02:25 AM
3

He spent about 2 minutes addressing the stat but spent most of that time talking about a reddit poster and the history of rape denial. The only time he addressed the actual stats he said "But this is misguided, it relies on the presumption that false and true claims have equally likely chances which isn't true". Not a good analysis in my opinion. If you've ever spent any time with a police department, you'll know the majority of the time, if they don't have sufficient evidence to prosecute, they…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 09:41 PM
20

I went out of my way to explain myself and that I'm not trying to minimize anything on another sub, but of course I still had someone shouting me down and using the "i" word. There's not much interest from a lot of people to look further into studies like these without people assuming the worst of you.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:07 PM
4

I'm not "pro-killing", I don't like it, I just think we shouldn't have laws legislating it wxcept for maybe the final trimester. My whole point though is it black and white meets the definition of "ending a life", "killing", etc. and a lot of other pro-choice people will admit that as well. Bill Maher was one that I remember.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 11:39 PM
16

I'm definitely pro-choice but you are killing someone still.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 09:50 PM
56

This is so royally fucked up, how did I not know about this - they literally strap the newborn babies down without anesthesia so they can cut off up to 1/3 of their penis... https://www.chsusainc.com/olympic-circumstraint
/r/MensRights16/07/24 04:50 PM
30

Dissenters are all incels! Just accept what she said here and apologize for how you were born.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/24 12:50 PM
32

They need to go outside. This isn't a "thought experiment". It's an unhealthy obsession by people with no lives.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/24 04:07 AM
2

Agreed. Best of luck to you Celatine, I wish nothing but the best for you. I'm putting up the phone, got to start up the BBQ, a few family friends coming over tonight including women (don't worry, I'm married and not planning on objectifying them). 🤡
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/24 09:40 PM
2

She's been radicalized just like the certain types of men she polices for and doesn't even realize it. To be fair, she's only 21 so it's possible she might make some IRL friends and grow out of it. I try to remain optimistic about people.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/24 09:29 PM
3

Wow, that's really sad. It looks like this kind of thing is her primary activity... There are scads of mentally ill men and women so I certainly wouldn't have made a post suggesting a "higher rate" for one gender over the other, but still... she really had to reach to get offended enough to post it. I'm sure someone could similarly comb through her history and find some doozies to share with the class here. I only occasionally interact here but I don't spend 8 hours a day combing this site looki…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/24 09:17 PM
2

Yikes, I just looked at your post history. You're one of those very people. I looked super hard and didn't find any "angry" posts on here.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/24 08:53 PM
12

It's just funny by this point. 95% of people are done talking about this stupid shit, except for a small portion of hyper-online shut-ins who have chosen to obsess over it. "It's a thought experiment!!" lol
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 10:26 PM
254

I feel you should put this on a more mixed gender sub, because women need to hear this.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:19 AM
2

Pinkhair /pĭngkhâr/ noun A terminally online person who is perpetually offended by anyone and anything not closely hewing to the PC playbook of acceptable behavior created by expert gender studies academics. Can often be seen spending hours a day analyzing various online communities for examples of said PC playbook infractions.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/05/24 12:37 PM
1

That's interesting - any more I can read about the methodology she used?
/r/MensRights18/01/24 07:18 PM
2

Upvoted 10 times in an hour. Seriously no one has a problem with the idea of sending men to concentration camps! "Oh we were just having a laugh!" Or something.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 05:32 AM
2

I made a very sarcastic troll post about an hour ago on a women's sub about how much I despised all men and wanted to send them to concentration camps (expecting to be banned) but the OP upvoted me and said very true and laughing emojis. Seriously, I know I'm not allowed to link comments here but feel free to go through my comments to find it.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 04:31 AM
4

We're any of those comments saved? I constantly get told by people that misandry "just doesn't exist" here, it's just fragile men. But that is heinous and should be shown to everyone.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 06:17 AM
30

They're living in a fantasy land perpetuated by online echo chambers that tell them men are supposed to kowtow to them at all times, otherwise they're misogynist. It's bizarre.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 06:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter