TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

edbegley1 Archive

View 9 posts and 290 comments by edbegley1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Then the Selective Service would be closed within a matter of weeks. Because women would complain about it being against their rights.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 11:30 PM
10

And he was only vindicated because they found contradicting text messages on her phone. This is very rare to be able to find something like that, and it's only these rare cases that are counted officially by police as "false rape accusations" that lead to the 2-8% figure that assholes misuse to claim false accusations are rare. Think about it. It's easy to see that the actual number of false accusations are much higher, it's a much bigger problem, but that falsely used statistic is used to downp…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 12:36 AM
–

A lot of the reason is because this kind of issue isn't really covered in media anywhere, because if a man speaks up about an issue like this he'll be be shunned by others.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 05:07 PM
1

No more personal accountability. Everything is someone else's fault according to women like her.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 09:33 PM
1

Maybe in a third-world country.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 11:13 AM
2

Well said.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 11:10 AM
3

True story - went looking for new boxers, used to Hanes, but Wranglers were cheaper. Said "women-owned" very prominently. Flimsy, they're shit, waste of money. If someone thinks more people will buy from them because they're women so they make that part of their marketing, they're the type of people who don't deserve a dime from me.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 11:07 AM
4

How many people actually know what questions were asked and how the NISVS studies are put together? There's an almost aggressive lack of skepticism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 09:17 AM
2

Unfortunately because of decades of having only their issues centered, many Western women won't even consider men's issues without at first having some sort of "grovelling". I don't know who Richard Reeves is but I imagine he's approaching it as a realist in order to get more of a foothold.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 11:55 AM
14

To.put it simply, women are more likely to "think" they have a mental illness (see fakedisordercringe).
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:26 AM
210

And oddly, Western women will still argue vociferously that they are still so much more oppressed than men. It's become a core part of their identities by this point.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 03:30 AM
14

So basically, her hate speech is acceptable because here are some stats of hurt women.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/25 05:56 PM
2

What field is that? Do they say outright they're looking to hire women first?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 10:06 AM
22

They will continue to want special scholarships, tutoring, job programs, business funding, etc., no matter how far ahead this societal privilege gets them, no matter how much more far ahead then men these get them. They will just have updated reasoning and will have come to expect that sort of thing. They will call men incels or misogynists for criticizing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 10:06 PM
13

You know you're a terrible person when you can't even entertain the idea or simply admit that sexism can be also harm the other sex. Can't even do that here, instead got to get indignant and justify hate. I guarantee the sexism these idiots came across in their lives weren't these extreme examples either, but that didn't mean they silently took it without speaking up. Same thing. Equality.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/05/25 11:16 AM
9

It's simply a lie - a prisoner is never equal to an officer in terms of consent. Even if that prisoner is male!
/r/MensRights18/05/25 07:01 PM
1

It's just as bad as any "manosphere" however the social sciences types who design any studies have a bit of an agenda to paint it as merely a male problem.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/25 07:10 PM
9

https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2025/02/05/the_armys_special_treatment_of_capt_rebecca_lobach_1089352.html I haven't found mention of the flight recording yet but it does seem there was some gross preferential treatment here. It looks like the Air Force even waited for her family to delete all her social media before they mentioned her name.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/25 06:58 PM
18

Or, and hear me out... Being terminally online and addicted to social media gives these mostly Western women the hyperbolic impression that just about everything is misogyny. Called a bad name? Misogyny. A man disagreed with you and wouldn't kowtow to whatever dogma you're vomiting on him? Misogyny. And while this hyper-primed sensitivity probably does get exhausting, is is certainly not PTSD, and it's offensive to people who actually have PTSD. I just read Bad Therapy (great book) and people (l…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 09:40 PM
11

How dare those men work to provide for themselves and their families.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 09:19 PM
2

Lazy comment. Men and women both cheat.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 09:08 PM
2

So this ovarit is like an incel.is but for women? No sir, there is no femsphere.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/25 12:10 PM
2

One major thing she's probably not even reflecting on... is that it's completely on these men to initiate and chase and prepare everything. It's not the 19th century anymore, you're not a princess interviewing your suitors. If you want equality, then you also need to practice it.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/25 06:47 PM
1

Your comment is used to justify poor treatment of men all the time. No one said you can't be aware of your surroundings and stay safe.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:07 PM
18

No matter what you do or think, some of those people will always assume the worst motivations because you're a man.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/25 11:41 AM
20

This is just wrong on so many levels. Of course they had to quote a woman saying it was good for her mental health. It wasn't for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/25 11:36 AM
2

Likewise 99% of the time someone complains abiut misogyny, it is not in a violent context. So... Ms. Ted talker is saying non-violent misogyny is bad and should be pushed back against, but non-violent misandry is not a big deal and we should shun anyone who points it out. What a disgusting human being. We just need to not treat others poorly based on immutable characteristics. That should not be controversial.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/25 03:18 AM
3

I think more awareness of real examples of misandry would make a difference. OP when you come across some of this stuff, r/everydaymisandry is a great place to put up a screenshot.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 02:59 AM
1

Your comment nowhere justifies treating regular men poorly because of their gender.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 02:51 AM
3

Feminism used to seek equality, now it's a trade group for women.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 02:37 AM
1

Do you know some good discord servers?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 03:50 AM
2

Honestly I need to use this site less because it's all over here, it can't be good for my blood pressure. I'm just hoping it's a pendulum thing and over time it will get better.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 03:29 AM
3

She does unfortunately. Looking at her comments she really does not like men at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 03:24 AM
5

He was a kid, you're imagining some very cynical motivations to a kid. If you've never done the asking out, it is a minefield, especially for an awkward kid with no experience. To justify what she did as not bullying because well he was just a man who should already understand this minefield even as a kid so of course this kid thought he'd practice male supremacy and pounce on a weak girl is a super toxic take, especially considering you are so passionately defending this idea. I wonder what nam…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 03:21 AM
9

I doubt the men even know that they can call this helpline, especially considering the language is only towards women. But then ironically, women would probably find a reason to get upset if they did update the language to be more inclusive...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 04:12 PM
1

I've always found it telling how so many people refer to nurturing or gentleness as a feminine trait or someone's "feminine side" while on the flip side I dare you to tell a female athlete her competitiveness means she's emracing her masculine side. You wouldn't survive to tell me how it went.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 09:57 PM
1

Listen and validate her, but if you hope for it to be reciprocal you're entitled and expecting emotional labor from her.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/25 12:18 PM
2

"But it's different"
/r/EverydayMisandry12/04/25 07:02 PM
7

The surge in misuse of words like of "objectification" and "fetishization" is just online brainrot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 12:18 AM
1

Does this give 80's Satanic Panic vibes to anyone else?
/r/MensRights02/04/25 01:47 AM
1

It's a good point of yours that so many feminists now are raising their sons to center their lives around meeting the needs of women. That's completely out of whack, they will grow up devaluing themselves. The pendulum in the West has gone to the other extreme with those kinds of people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/25 10:44 PM
3

I usually see it now as an go-to insult by a lot of women against any man who expresses any kind of dissatisfaction at all that includes a woman. The women using it like this are sexist every bit as much as this often terminally online "incel" caricature.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 04:26 PM
2

Did she spend most of her time on social media complaining about all the housework she's got to do?
/r/MensRights30/03/25 04:07 PM
0

Your post is absolutely something I could see a sales division posting regarding branching out into a new market, so yes, you're treating it like sales. But you're quibbling. Human relationships are not something to be treated like a marketing or business strategy or analyzed like this, and anyone trying to do that severely lacks the EQ to be in a healthy romantic relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 01:24 PM
0

Human relationships is not sales. It is not marketing or any other business discipline. That's all the substance I need here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 10:40 PM
5

Dude, your whole post is dystopic and further clarifies the decline of modern dating. People should just be real and quit wasting so much time online treating it like a pseudo sales job. I'm glad I've already got someone good.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 07:28 PM
1

Well put.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 07:10 PM
1

We don't have official reports of all actual false accusations.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 07:09 PM
20

And 90% of it is not justified by safety. It's often generalized resentment or even hatred towards the opposite sex. However, safety or fear is usually still provided as the justification. Much like other flavirs of bigotry in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 07:34 PM
25

The complete silence on this kind of thing from women's groups teaches me all I need to know regarding any true desire for equality. #showdonttell
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 11:27 PM
1

I didn't say I wasn't, I just see it so often online women saying how much more dangerous it is in public than men when it's not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 05:02 PM
–

I guess so, double standards are fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 12:51 PM
–

This is incel/black-pill content and against the rules of this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 12:02 PM
–

Does that make it any less true?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 11:34 AM
1

You truly are hyper online, one can cherry pick whatever the fuck they want off social media but it does not prove any kind of point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 11:33 AM
–

We're both going by personal experience, neither of us have something to "show" here. You're hyper online, I see more empathy for the women. Weird imagined comments towards the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:25 PM
–

If we go just by violent crime statistics, men should be more afraid in public than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:24 PM
1

I usually see it the other way around especially here. Women's standards are just considered preferences while valid men's ones are various flavors of ist.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:20 PM
–

I guarantee you there is just as much if not more hate for the men. You got to recognize though that every situation is unique, and a lot of those men were pushed out or it was made extremely difficult for them to spend time with their kids. A lot of blame that can be spread around. A lot of people who weaponize the kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:13 PM
2

I have no idea what you're saying lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 10:05 PM
3

You didn't address my main point. However, there is nothing showing men place any more value on physical traits than women in the dating market. You've only got a sexist bone to pick here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 09:00 PM
4

Not accurate and kind of sexist. But even for the men around 18-25 and slim, it's sexist. If you're repeating the idea that men need to just compete harder and impress the women better while the women just need to sit and pick what they like, then you're part of the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 06:41 PM
3

You're misrepresenting again.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 06:38 PM
3

You misrepresented what I said (that's common on this sub lol) - my point was you're normalizing the men having to compete with each other like peacocks to get a potential date's attention. It's not healthy. Instead of telling men "just put in more effort to impress her!", we need to tell them to meet women in person and not on these toxic dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 05:58 PM
3

This is why I'm glad I'm not dating any more - you're turning it into a job interview.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 03:41 PM
8

It's interesting because when someone mentions the rampant misandry on here someone always asks "well can you show some examples?" but then when you do show examples like on this sub, someone always invariably decides to "look" at your profile and they take a 5 second glance at your page and make a moral "oh guys don't take him seriously, i looked at his page and he's an incel" kind of judgment.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/02/25 01:44 PM
1

Because killing men is funny!
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/25 11:25 PM
24

This is super ironic, because by assuming Depp as a rapist she's proving the very point she's trying to argue against. Amber Heard successfully tarred his reputation permanently with millions of femcels, no matter the actual evidence that was uncovered during the defamation trial.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/25 02:18 PM
38

Her name is Kristine Larson (she's a public figure folks so I can name her). She has a degree in Sociology, and led a group called "Equity on Fire" complaining that the LAFD is sexist and racist. Now she got what she wanted, is making $400k, and wants men to know that expecting someone to carry them out of a fire is misogynist.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/25 09:02 PM
13

The enslaved men in the picture probably brought it about themselves somehow or are somehow responsible for the situation they found themselves in.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 04:50 PM
1

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 10:44 PM
1

Sometimes a mark of maturity is admitting when you were wrong. All I did was call you out. You needed to be called out. I suspect too often you get used to bullying others into silence.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 10:16 PM
1

It's not an "insult" when it's the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 09:37 PM
1

And immature, bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 09:33 PM
1

"You must have some shitty relationships" is absolutely personal kimosabe. And you're still being derisive with that new reply. Go bother someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 09:27 PM
1

So you tell yourself, that first reply was absolutely an attempt at an insult. I'm not doing anything here that you aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 08:03 PM
1

Said the person who's laughing and using emojis to shame someone they disagree with, and claiming they must be in "shitty relationships".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 07:32 PM
1

At least you admit to your lack of maturity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 05:44 PM
1

So when you lose the argument, you resort to what you "think" and "laugh" at the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:43 PM
1

You "think" I'm wrong. You "think" the psychologist I quoted is wrong. Go ahead and "think" whatever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:23 PM
1

Wow, so you didn't read my reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 02:53 PM
1

Again, you're not debating, you're just trying to be snarky. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/myths-desire/201701/why-couples-have-sex-even-when-one-partner-isnt-in-the-mood Rosemary Basson, a pioneer in the field of sexual desire research, describes how both women and men, but particularly women, can often feel open and receptive to having sex without having a strong urge to “get off"—and that this is both healthy and normal. I suspect you won't have a real reply to this and will give me…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 02:43 PM
1

Yes, occasionally someone is not too in the mood but their partner is horny. You're clearly not in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 02:38 PM
1

You didn't prove anyone wrong here. The very link you shared says 2-8% are the cases the police departments had sufficient evidence to declare them as false allegations. That figure does not include the false allegations that were filed away as insufficient evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 02:23 PM
1

My god, you have no reading comprehension. I said at "various times", not "most of the times", 90% of couples occasionally have a partner who's not particularly interested but have sex with their partner because they want it. You would understand this if you had healthy relationships yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 02:17 PM
5

I think you're still missing my point, that every time the fact that it's brought up that men are more likely to be victims of violence, someone always comes up with "but it's mostly at the hands of other men". At this point it's a whataboutism because it's not relevant - the stats of male violence victims are usually brought up to women who complain about themselves being much more in danger in public, merely to illustrate that no, you're not, and we should try to protect everyone more, men and…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 11:30 PM
1

If you read those studies, those are the ones with sufficient evidence for the police departments to mark them as false accusations. For a case to have sufficient evidence for this is rare. Ask any detective and they will tell you the majority of the time for any criminal investigation, they will archive it as "insufficient evidence". There is nothing out there showing false allegations as a whole are rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:47 PM
1

I'm curious if you have data for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:44 PM
8

I feel comments like yours try to deflect from the original point. When one says men are more likely to experience violence, we don't need to go into a debate about if they experience it from men or women more. It doesn't change the fact that they experience more violence because they are men. The gender of the perpetrator does not change this fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:40 PM
1

So many online women will say the most vile things possible about men in general, then invent phrases like "not all men" when a man says something about it. Or they're just "talking about lived experiences"... It was beaten over my head growing up that we need to treat each other as equals. Except more and more nowadays, these types of women are giving themselves every exception under the sun.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:36 PM
1

I never said they don't enthusiastically consent most of the times. If someone isn't in the mood and someone else is horny and they go through with it, do you consider that "enthusiastic consent"?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:14 PM
1

Wait, that simple comment of mine was somehow problematic? Or you're agreeing with me. Or you're misrepresenting what I said? I'm confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:13 PM
–

This sub is full of terminally online shut-ins, not sure why I'm still on here lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:29 PM
–

Let me guess, you're not in a relationship. This is literally 90% of couples at various times. A husband or wife can not be in the mood and still consent to having sex with a partner who wants it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 01:22 PM
–

It's certainly not rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 01:18 PM
–

"Enthusiastic consent" is yet another terminally online / blue-haired gender studies thing that is going to go away eventually. You're right, consent is black and white and is not always "enthusiastic". A couple who are both drinking and have a drunken hookup one or the other may regret the next day have not raped each other. When I'm tired but my wife is horny so I have sex with her, I may not have been "enthusiastic", but she didn't rape me. Two people on a TV show who don't verbally consent w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 01:17 PM
1

Wow, you waited a week this time. Move on already.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 10:04 PM
238

Thank god for Joey Swoll.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 12:13 AM
–

You've been on here nonstop, what are you talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 02:11 PM
–

You literally live on here don't ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 01:43 PM
7

Saw this same horrible shit when these women learned Margot Robbie had a boy, wishing for "cot death" and shit like that. So vile.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/12/24 01:40 PM
7

And yet the media only talks about the "manosphere". These femsphere communities are often multitudes worse.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 01:36 PM
1

You haven't backed up your sexist assertion this whole time.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 12:50 PM
2

Co-opted by sexist women.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 12:49 PM
35

Men with SO's are called incels all the time LMAO
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:47 PM
20

Disclosure
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:55 AM
1

If you so much as as a follow-up question now, you "hate" women. Definitely not raising my daughters to be like this.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:41 AM
1

There is literally nothing proving "false accusations are rare". And I can probably confidently say that people like yourself who trot that phrase out to dismiss legitimate concerns are the ones who hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 11:56 PM
5

I'm heartened to see this upvoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 11:54 PM
1

That is not what she said.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 11:52 PM
1

You think this is more common with men based off one thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 11:31 PM
2

That sub is a fucking cesspit. Horrible people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 11:28 PM
1

No. "Teen" is a large category, it is not the "most popular" one, and it depicts adults. Nothing about that is somehow "pedophilic". It's not only grossly inaccurate but grossly misandrist and I think breaks the terms of this site so I'm reporting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 10:54 PM
1

It isn't the most popular category, but even if it was it does not lead to your conclusion, not even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 02:34 PM
0

No, they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 01:26 PM
2

Very well said!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 11:06 PM
3

Bluesky loves to brag about how much nicer they are, but then it's littered with bashing anyone remotely conservative.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 08:50 PM
1

Well this company is obviously shit and aren't communicating with each other, because I get blatantly misandrist posts removed by reporting them as hate all the time.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/24 08:14 PM
1

Ask any cop - it is super rare for them to label a case as "false allegation" which is the source of the 2% number. Most of them, if there isn't sufficient evidence, they mark it as such, they close it, and it's not counted in that number.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 11:52 PM
1

Damn misogynist justice system.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 11:48 PM
16

Spot on - if it's "unrealistic portrayals" they're worried about with AI, those pulp Harlequin romances are just as bad.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 12:43 AM
2

Trafficking is bad, yes, but it's also extremely rare in porn. Ask any of these ladies for data and they'll link one or two stories. But it's blown massively out of proportion like so many of the issues they get riled up about. There is no data to suggest it's a widespread issue.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 12:41 AM
14

I disagree, more people need to see this side of the femsphere and stop pretending it's only men who do this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 01:42 PM
26

Said the hateful "blatantmisogyny" incel.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:00 AM
60

Great, the "fragile male feelings" crap is only going to be all over this site. I should probably stay off of here.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 12:58 AM
3

It's a subjective declaration. You are defending something you don't understand. "The probability is higher" is just the jury's understanding, and it's still "probability", not a declaration of guilt. Edit: she blocked me on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:43 AM
2

It doesn't. It was her word against his. Which is why she took it to civil and not criminal court. She was literally believed because of her gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:40 AM
5

"Preponderance of the evidence". I take it you don't understand what that means. That's why I said alleged. Civil court is not guilt. It is so far removed from "beyond the shadow of a doubt" it's laughable. You literally are believing her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:37 AM
4

She's an incel herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:36 AM
7

You got examples from mensrights that weren't removed? Or more likely just hoping people believe you at face value? Twox, feminism, trollx... there is no moderation at all to stop male bashing. It goes on all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:34 AM
2

"Preponderance of the evidence" is an exceedingly low bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:32 AM
5

Alleged, by a civil suit. It's extremely common for male celebrities to have spurious sexual assault claims from certain types of people. Look up reputation risk insurance I'm sure you automatically "believe all women" though and cancel any man without further thought who's ever had this happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:29 AM
4

So a few college men are joining the millions of women who've been saying "kill all men" for years.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:21 AM
5

God damn that's evil.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 11:56 PM
17

Absolutely we all know who will be drafted. And the women against drafting women will have some supremely back-asswards justification. "Well the women don't deserve to get sexually harassed!"
/r/MensRights11/11/24 01:11 AM
2

1305 pro-Trump bot accounts. Not sure if "much worse" is an appropriate conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 11:47 AM
2

Right, they literally exploded to like 15% of accounts.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 11:45 AM
3

I hope so.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 01:35 AM
3

To call pushback against this sexism "silly" just because it's being directed at men in this case is offensive. The talk about aborting baby boys and the rage because Barbie had a boy and not a girl, and the hate this kid is going to come across directed his way as he grows up because of his gender is not alright.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 01:28 AM
19

The only time I've ever seen it used on here is women using it in a derogatory manner. Yeah, real nice decent people.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 01:18 AM
5

You made the claim that it's full of bots. The onus is on you here to back it up. If you can't, then it's just your belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 01:17 AM
9

Yes and there was no evidence bots got worse "honey".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 01:12 AM
8

No, the entire globe doesn't "know" that. I doubt you even looked at the accounts who commented and liked it. "Bots" where they exist are political propaganda. You still have provided no evidence for your claim here. It's just a way for you to convince yourself real women aren't saying this kind of thing, when they are in droves. Here - latest estimate as of 2020 was 15% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167404820300031. 15% is not a sufficiently large number to call the …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 01:01 AM
11

What is there to "know" about that. Do you have any evidence or do you just "know it in your gut". Because that's super intelligent. Also... OP mentioned tiktok, twitter, and reddit. But yiu didn't read it that closely.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 12:40 AM
25

Oh my god it's you lol. 28,000 likes are not "bots". There is no evidence that any of them are bots. You only want to believe they're bots because women are all angels in your estimation. Your first thought is "bots", probably because you're just parroting comments you saw elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 12:35 AM
8

Slight correction: so many of them are not traumatized in the least yet they have convinced themselves they are. All those man bad danger stories they share with each other literally give them PTSD! /s
/r/MensRights05/11/24 12:15 AM
11

Well there's at least 300k women on blatantmisogyny alone so I can guarantee they'd be making a fuss, and you wouldn't call them "chronically online" for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 12:00 AM
39

Yet if the genders were reversed you'd be joining in the outrage.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 10:04 PM
1

It's not "just skin cutting" and anyone who says that is probably purposefully being ignorant. It's part of the genitals, and there are tens of thousands if not more specialized nerve endings. It's been my experience that it's not usually "intactivists" who are trying to say it's as bad or worse than FGM, but certain women who get reflexively offended at even the use of a term like MGM, and their blood pressure goes up and they think people are trying to compare who has it worse. But most people…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/24 10:54 PM
1

FINO's.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:24 PM
1

This was one of the most offensive TV segments I'd seen in a long time. But no mass blowback for it here, and we all know why.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:20 PM
1

My hot take: most of the new "x gap" phrases are made by shut-ins.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 10:39 PM
6

About 5000 on the frontline out of over 500,000, so about 1%.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 06:32 PM
3

I heard it recently on NPR of all places - "almost half were women and children".
/r/MensRights30/10/24 06:29 PM
13

That's really nice 🙂, thanks for sharing the idea.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 12:05 AM
18

In the dictionary feminism is fighting for equal rights for women, not just to fight any and all women-specific problems so that they become a privileged class. So she's wrong. And fuck her for being so entitled and calling someone evil for not kowtowing to her. "It's for women!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/24 10:10 PM
85

So women wanting to get laid = empowerment. Men wanting to get laid = entitled, transactional, disrespectful.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/10/24 05:00 PM
1

I don't just "say so"... https://np.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2F9mk1ki7kx9ud1.jpeg Kill all men: https://np.reddit.com/r/iamatotalpieceofshit/comments/tqed9j/woman_says_we_should_kill_all_men_and_kill_male/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=usertext&utm_name=PurplePillDebate&utm_content=t1_lu6864t
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:38 PM
1

I don't just "say so"... https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2F9mk1ki7kx9ud1.jpeg
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:29 PM
1

Not at all the same. I've seen countless real-world examples of the misandry I'm talking about it. So no, I'm not just parroting talking points like you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:24 PM
1

Yes. My only point is that misandry exists and it is not just "telling about lived experiences". That's easy to prove, it's black and white, but you showed you don't care to learn more.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:21 PM
0

That's ironic, because you already had your mind made up, which is why I said you're only interacting with me in bad faith. I could give you thousands of examples where they're not just "talking about their experiences". But you don't really care.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:14 PM
-1

You're giving this one example to represent all misandry. Not an honest or good faith take. None of your posts here are in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:53 PM
2

That's 90% of the arguments on purplepilldebate - "Well this is what I've seen so it should be obvious for everyone else too!" Of course the type of people that would hang out in a place like that all day aren't top shelf.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/10/24 12:40 PM
0

It's not, you're misrepresenting it and I suspect you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:38 PM
1

No, that's not most misandry online, not even close to accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 02:15 AM
10

Hey everyone, she's a Registered Nurse, she knows what she's talking about!
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/24 07:12 PM
6

Perfect.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 04:09 PM
1

Um, I never said men don't also say that. Your whole thing this whole time has been that it's just men who say it, but even these examples don't back it up. These subs in your examples though have a lot of reasonable people. Go to women, twox, or feminist and it's a common thing for them to do it. So yes, if you're going to continue to pretend it's just men who say it, even when your examples alone show otherwise, that shows your own sexism. Have the day you deserve! (that's such a petty way to …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 11:47 AM
2

This is your own sexist filter because there are no more toxic men than women on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 06:22 PM
1

Casual indignance is such a sport now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 06:09 PM
1

https://www.statista.com/statistics/418470/number-of-perpetrators-in-child-abuse-cases-in-the-us-by-sex/ "I know for a fact"....
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 06:08 PM
1

I disagree. A few examples is not going to change the fact that the most toxic people on here are usually women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 06:07 PM
1

You edited this lol. "Should be intuitively obvious", said by 100% of people who can't think of anything to bolster their regressive ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 06:05 PM
1

Oh snap lol... yeah you're confirming my impressions about you. This sub is your entire personality but you're not even clever.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:54 PM
1

Were you afraid I wouldn't catch that the first time you said it? Read my earlier comment. You're providing me this in reference to some assertion of yours of which I'm not quite sure, so it's on you to show the relevant section to back this mystery conclusion of yours up.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:47 PM
1

"Large" - if you're the gender studies expert here (what a thing to be proud of!) what hard number is that subjective term referring to here? Still doesn't support whatever damning thing about men you seem to think it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:39 PM
4

I'd like the men and women who do this to stop being hostile. The difference between you and me here being I'm not a bigot and directing the pushback only towards one gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:36 PM
1

No, the equivalent of sticking out one's tongue is not hurtful, it's just pathetic to see an adult saying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:34 PM
1

That does not support your assertion, at all. Those studies are pointing to slight quantitative differences. They are not the indictment on men you seem to suppose them to be. This is sad. You're occupying all your time either searching and searching online thinking you're going to show me up about something (although I'm not quite sure what about), or worse - you're an assiduous study saver. The latter of course is significantly sadder and this sub is full of those types.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:33 PM
1

There's a difference there. That was a more clever insult directed at someone who couldn't form a well-thought out opinion. Yours just sucked. It's repeated ad nauseum by idiots, it's literally said by third graders (they're excused though at that age because they may have just recently heard it).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:24 PM
5

You're trying so hard to make your double standards here some kind of empowerment thing, it's cute. Women do the same thing here yet you're clearly only angered about one side.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:57 PM
2

Do you have a citation for that because I hear women complain about that all the time. FFS your post history... you're a serial complainer yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:54 PM
3

Yet you probably get enraged when you hear men criticize women's preferences. #doublestandardsarefun
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:44 PM
1

Right on! Shut up about your preferences unless you're a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:41 PM
1

"it is men who are saying it" No citation given. Maybe because that's your imaginative thinking picked up from your online spaces.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:29 PM
1

You furiously looked for a study (I guess you don't work) and the link doesn't even work. If you do find a working link please quote the relevant section and the conclusion you think it makes, because just from your text that does not support "men will literally fuck anything" as you're probably so fond of circlejerking about as a hobby.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:28 PM
1

You're simply misrepresenting me and what I'm referring to and I'm sure you know it.. It's trendy af to disparage men as degenerate horndogs. Stop the "it might be a you problem". That's immature grade school horseshit and you're only making yourself look like more of an ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:24 PM
1

You know which one - it's more tragic when crime happens to women.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 10:14 PM
1

Ffs cherry-picked quotes from one thread is not "evidence" sufficient to make the conclusion you did here. I said earlier that there are just as much if not more of these kinds of quotes from women on thos same thread but you ignored it because it didn't support the preconceived idea of yours. You seem strangely passionate holding onto thos ridiculous inaccurate opinion of yours. Much like the creation museum cherry-picking scoence. Just admit you hate men and we can leave it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:26 PM
1

Again you're just assuming it's mostly men. I'm "resorting to insults" because you haven't given me one shred of evidence here . I imagine this is how you deflect anything like this - "well no men are worse / it's really their fault / women are all angels who are just victims of the patriarchy!!" I suspect I'm pretty damn close to your worldview but you won't admit it to me here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:01 PM
1

The idea that negative stereotypes of men "just need to be handled by men"... if you can't see how offensive that idea is then you have no hope. Misandry from women is just up to men to handle, not a problem or issue for the women who have it. Smh you're a lost fucking cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:37 AM
1

My guy, it still doesn't mean it's a thing that's happening everywhere. All of you that are defending this ridiculous idea, no one has provided any evidence. I don't get your women child care comment, women are more likely to abuse children, unless you're telling on more of your own sexist ideas you believe to he true.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:34 AM
1

Oh... "women have heard men say it". That's facts shore nuff. I've heard people talk about the Jewish conspiracy to take over the banking system, but that doesn't make it a fact. Learn what real evidence is, it's not hearsay. I'm using "childish" insults because most of the people in here are fucking brain dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:31 AM
1

Even though this is just one thread, I went back and looked closer. There sre at least 20-30 women just in here propogating that myth as well. Still, again it's one thread. Even if it were mostly men saying it in here which it's not, anyone with half a brain is smart enough to realize one example is not representative of an entire population. I always thought "airhead" was figurative but now my illustration is bringing me to some realizations about a lot of the people who choose to hang out here…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:51 AM
2

So now you're trying to instigate something else because you couldn't back up what you said earlier... Because I'm calling you out on your completely imagined arguments (you do this all the time, all day every day, I suspect you're on disability and wear a bathrobe all day)... I "don't possess social responsibility"... because I don't use kid gloves with morons. You really take the cake. You're the town drunk who's always there thinking he's participating in others' conversations when he's just …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:39 AM
1

Yiu're giving me the example of one thread, and then getting your panties in a twist and calling me names lol. God this sub is full of losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:31 AM
1

My point was that there is no "study" that shows there are so many necrophile male morticians that funeral homes avoud hiring men. From everything I can tell, that's yet another terminally online myth. Another mutation of the "men are nothing but dirty porn-obsessed loser sex addicts" trope that is so popular among certain xy carriers on this site now. Certainly listing a few specific cases says nothing about the broader population of male morticians.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:10 AM
1

No I didn't say men don't say that kind of thing. My favorite terminally online activity: reading imagined arguments into what people say.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:06 AM
1

So you proved my point "here's a study, men are worse!" Delayed maturity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:32 AM
1

What was the point of this - you one of those study-savers I was mentioning?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:31 AM
1

I don't understand what you think these are supposed to prove in your mind... this is weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:30 AM
0

Does that study look at the prevalence? No, it's only examining the why and how specific cases, and the 4 or 5 ones mentioned are men. Not the mea culpa you thought it was. I swear this sub is full of idiots
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:26 AM
0

It takes examples from many women's subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:24 AM
2

Oh, one example. Your username is ironic!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:22 AM
1

r/everydaymisandry has a lot of examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:03 PM
2

I could say the same thing for online gossip groups where women air out all of their ex's dirty laundry to the public. They're shitty for doing that but I'm not going to generalize all women. Same thing. No, coming across men online doing things like that is not understandable for someone to then think "all men" are like that. That's silly as hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:29 PM
1

I don't understand why so many women on here save studies to show off how much "worse" men are. "Oh yeah? Where there's this study that shows they tip less!" Once someone matures they realize this kind of thing is silly and pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:27 PM
-2

Simply provide evidence for this, because you can't. Everything you say on this sub is completely made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:25 PM
1

Lol - I'm not going to waste my time finding it for you. If you truly frequented them as you say then you wouldn't be so huffy asking for examples, you'd know exactly what I mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:24 PM
0

Okay... then can you share it? Because I can't find it and I really think you're just repeating things you've heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:24 PM
-1

You're just repeating a lot of fringe examples to justify your generalizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:24 AM
2

It's not - this kind of generalizing is all over women's subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:21 AM
-8

There was no such "study" and there was not an epidemic of male morticians doing this ffs. Edit: downvoted by "purple pill debate" women who haven't provided a single study. Because this is just their sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:20 AM
-3

I knew I'd find some self-justifying misandrists on this thread lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:14 AM
69

Women's problems are society's problems and men's problems are for them to figure out themselves.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 09:23 PM
6

Yikes.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 07:56 PM
1

The real problem is millions of these types of women, they are only bothered when women are victims. I see time and time again on women's subs that there is an "epidemic" of violence against women, when women are maybe 20-25% of the victims. Those types of assholes need to be reminded that all violence is bad, and we should not just focus on reducing violence against women. We do not need special programs or extra funding to treat violence against women as the more important problem. Therefore 9…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/10/24 07:52 PM
14

Do you want to know the real answer? Because it genuinely takes an imbecile to believe that there is some magic utopian societal structure that would somehow erase our problems. They are the ones writing about these "utopias", so it doesn't surprise me there are still forms of slavery in so many of them. The writers are all morons.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/10/24 07:40 PM
1

Had to report this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 06:41 PM
13

I wonder what you're basing your second sentence off of. Was there a study or is that your most likely uninformed opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 10:56 PM
1

Not necessarily a full-on substitute but a great occasional complement. I don't think most clients see them probably more than once a month and you can get decent ones for $150-200 a half hour. Definitely worth it as part of a treat yourself day every now and then.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 10:53 PM
1

I mean, the girl you're talking to is clearly an incel herself. Just let her pretend to be oppressed while she gets another big mac with daddy's money in the car he bought for her. Western "victims" are the height of irony. Let her drive every decent man out of her life while she continues to get more bitter and hateful and starts her cat collection. She's the loser here.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 11:52 PM
–

I don't understand your use of "MRA's" here. A man can't point out misandry without being called an MRA? Just call them men.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 12:51 PM
1

Yeah the r/women thread yesterday proved that.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/10/24 10:52 AM
5

That's why they often abuse it with impunity, they know there will be no consequences to them.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 07:03 PM
1

Pressure from very vocal feminists to put more men behind bars because of course women never lie.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:52 PM
–

It's so overused over here, calling men "incels / misogynists" etc. People tell themselves they're "only calling out the bad men" but they're not any more for the most part. American men are being broadly tarnished like this, which led to my point that there's actually a lot of misandry there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 01:19 PM
18

And of course... Joe Blow truck driver who's just been cleaned out by his ex and forced to eat ramen so he can afford to continue to support her... was not one of these "privileged men" liberal caricatures. One side however crass actually professes to give a damn about him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 10:50 AM
2

That's interesting - any good article talking about that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 09:56 AM
–

3170 likes. And this same poster probably complains about the "manosphere".
/r/EverydayMisandry16/10/24 09:29 AM
83

I don't like Mike Pence but that's one thing he was absolutely right about.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:20 AM
286

Somewhat similar - my car's battery was dead one night after the gym, probably 8:30. It's part of a strip mall and I saw probably 3 women walk to their car. I left them alone and got a jump from the first guy I saw. Not going to risk being treated like a potential predator or have the cops called because I'm a strange dude approaching women in the dark. After all, I'm not a bear.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:07 AM
23

They've grown up being told they are the only victims. It's a coveted status to them so they get irrationally upset when told otherwise. When r/mensrights was somewhat new, countless online women were offended just by its existence, not necessarily by any of the content, so now you have assholes using "MRA" as a slur against any man who dares to criticize a woman.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/10/24 12:05 AM
13

Crickets... Most men won't speak up about something like this because they'll be called "incel", "MRA", mocked and othered, even though Tyrese has a rock-fucking-solid argument here.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 11:08 PM
10

My wife for instance lol.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 12:14 PM
-12

Cute as hell, but I think here there's still some maturity that she has a chance of growing out of. The buzzwords she's throwing out are popular at the moment. Of course I'd probably hate to see her social media though... but I'd buy something from her onlyfans.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 11:10 PM
16

It's just more weaponized victimhood. And if you call them out on it, you're a "misogynist".
/r/MensRights30/09/24 02:08 PM
31

I was just arguing with someone about this. She trotted out the "b-but women attempt suicide more!" I know people who have attempted and committed suicide. If men are more successful it's because many more of them are more serious about it. Big difference between cutting yourself or taking a bunch of Tylenol and shooting yourself in the head. I'm tired of pussyfooting around about it, women that mention that as if it can be directly compared need to get their heads out of their asses.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 01:54 PM
5

Absolutely horrible women writing this. It's exactly the same kind of crap that's giving rise to youmg women using "incel" for any man that disagrees with her, is slightly overweight, or awkward in any way. "Incel" is the new "bitch", except the genders have reversed.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 11:36 PM
1

Because they espouse equal rights, not female superiority.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 06:27 PM
1

Your mother's not a true feminist then.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:56 PM
19

Don't look up the circumstraint, not good for your blood pressure.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 10:42 AM
34

Report that kind of thing as hate.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/09/24 11:19 PM
1

Someone please tell me they're replying directly to these fucking chuckleheads.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/09/24 10:52 PM
6

It's ironic because all over social media you have people saying "feminism is about men too becuz it's about equality", yet those same people get mad when someone like Gemma mentions becoming more inclusive of men.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 08:44 PM
4

Approximately 80% of all possible male behavior is now misogynist or "toxic masculinity" to someone.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 06:25 PM
2

Rule #2,347 for the modern-day respectful man.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 07:48 PM
16

Not me but it happened to my then-BIL. We'd travelled somewhere on vacation with my wife's sister, her husband, and they're family. My wife had gone into a store at one point and I was in the passenger's seat waiting. I saw my sil and her husband get into an argument outside of their car almost in front of me. She was very animatedly yelling in his face for a bit. He's usually a pretty laid-back guy but she wouldn't get out of his face so I saw him lightly push away her shoulder so he could leav…
/r/MensRights31/08/24 06:14 PM
20

"Believe all women."
/r/MensRights31/08/24 06:00 PM
6

Incels of the female kind.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/08/24 01:00 PM
32

This whole online men are predators thing is just boomer fox news illegal immigrant scaremongering in a different format. But they lack the self-awareness to notice it.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/24 04:17 PM
3

I've got a lot of misandrist crap removed reporting it as hate.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:50 AM
2

So many women on this video absolutely triggered and enraged that more guys are talking about them merely paying for themselves 😆
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 06:51 PM
3

I like that she's standing up for her son here, but it's interesting that in how she's doing this, she's also showing a toxic mentality, the idea that she's got to pass a litmus test to prove her son is egalitarian, that he's not a regressive knuckle-dragging misogynist, to the rest of the world, before she can make this point. We need to push back on this idea. We do not have to submit to litmus tests like this from strangers before we are allowed to share our perspectives on subjects like this…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 02:27 PM
1

They don't - the numbers in the 3 cited studies above explicitly only count the cases where the police conclusively could prove innocence. And we know for the majority of cops, once they drop charges, they're move on to the next one. That's why there are so many vague "insufficient evidence" cases. Interestingly, there are countless women's groups that presume every single one of those "insufficient evidence" cases are in fact guilty rapists who are getting away with it. Who's got the bias here?
/r/MensRights01/08/24 02:25 AM
19

This pretty much. I don't share those kinds of atories myself on here necause everyone else who does it gets mocked, harassed, and whatabouted by toxic shutins, mostly women in this case.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 02:19 AM
3

He spent about 2 minutes addressing the stat but spent most of that time talking about a reddit poster and the history of rape denial. The only time he addressed the actual stats he said "But this is misguided, it relies on the presumption that false and true claims have equally likely chances which isn't true". Not a good analysis in my opinion. If you've ever spent any time with a police department, you'll know the majority of the time, if they don't have sufficient evidence to prosecute, they…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 09:41 PM
20

I went out of my way to explain myself and that I'm not trying to minimize anything on another sub, but of course I still had someone shouting me down and using the "i" word. There's not much interest from a lot of people to look further into studies like these without people assuming the worst of you.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:07 PM
1

I'm curious how people on other subs would try to explain this away.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 04:10 PM
1

Have you seen the developmental stages in the womb lol
/r/MensRights20/07/24 07:46 PM
2

There's a switch that flips on somewhere in the hypothalamus at the precise moment the baby exits the birth canal. /s
/r/MensRights20/07/24 03:22 PM
4

I'm not "pro-killing", I don't like it, I just think we shouldn't have laws legislating it wxcept for maybe the final trimester. My whole point though is it black and white meets the definition of "ending a life", "killing", etc. and a lot of other pro-choice people will admit that as well. Bill Maher was one that I remember.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 11:39 PM
3

Yeah this whole kind of argument devolves really quickly. Life is super simple to define. I'm not going to pretend someone isn't "alive" to spare someone's feelings but that doesn't mean I'm going to be super judgy.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 10:27 PM
16

I'm definitely pro-choice but you are killing someone still.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 09:50 PM
1

And it took her "two years of therapy to learn she wasn't a bad person"!! 🤪 And she's a "life coach"... I wonder how much life coaching she actually does since she probably just found herself another provider.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 06:29 PM
2

I also curious - that's a favorite that is constantly cited by certain shutins.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 06:26 PM
56

This is so royally fucked up, how did I not know about this - they literally strap the newborn babies down without anesthesia so they can cut off up to 1/3 of their penis... https://www.chsusainc.com/olympic-circumstraint
/r/MensRights16/07/24 04:50 PM
30

Dissenters are all incels! Just accept what she said here and apologize for how you were born.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/24 12:50 PM
32

They need to go outside. This isn't a "thought experiment". It's an unhealthy obsession by people with no lives.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/24 04:07 AM
1

This is sad. No one here is "unable to cope" - the whole thing is a joke that most reasonable people make fun of. 5 years from now you'll still be writing blog posts about bears while everyone else interacts in the real world, with flesh and blood people they care about. Best of luck to you - you are a very bitter person with a lot of hate in your heart, but like I said, you're a kid who has been radicalized online and there is still hope to learn to treat people decently.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/24 02:25 AM
2

Agreed. Best of luck to you Celatine, I wish nothing but the best for you. I'm putting up the phone, got to start up the BBQ, a few family friends coming over tonight including women (don't worry, I'm married and not planning on objectifying them). 🤡
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/24 09:40 PM
2

She's been radicalized just like the certain types of men she polices for and doesn't even realize it. To be fair, she's only 21 so it's possible she might make some IRL friends and grow out of it. I try to remain optimistic about people.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/24 09:29 PM
3

Wow, that's really sad. It looks like this kind of thing is her primary activity... There are scads of mentally ill men and women so I certainly wouldn't have made a post suggesting a "higher rate" for one gender over the other, but still... she really had to reach to get offended enough to post it. I'm sure someone could similarly comb through her history and find some doozies to share with the class here. I only occasionally interact here but I don't spend 8 hours a day combing this site looki…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/24 09:17 PM
2

Yikes, I just looked at your post history. You're one of those very people. I looked super hard and didn't find any "angry" posts on here.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/24 08:53 PM
5

Oh yeah, not referring to you 😁 - just people like the one you screenshotted here.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 10:47 PM
12

It's just funny by this point. 95% of people are done talking about this stupid shit, except for a small portion of hyper-online shut-ins who have chosen to obsess over it. "It's a thought experiment!!" lol
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 10:26 PM
254

I feel you should put this on a more mixed gender sub, because women need to hear this.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:19 AM
1

What are the names of some of these bootcamps? I can't believe there isn't more blowback.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 11:17 PM
1

Rename it then?
/r/MensRights05/07/24 11:15 PM
1

What were some of the scholarship names?
/r/MensRights05/07/24 11:15 PM
1

Are you not able to get another job in teaching at the moment at least? I know a lot of teachers who got their master's part-time while they were working and you can move up in the school and get paid decently.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 05:17 PM
5

That is interesting - most of these stories seem to not want to use the "rape" word when the perpretrators are women.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 04:40 PM
1

So how do they go from .004% to claiming 1 in 4? That's the number I see get trotted out all the time.
/r/MensRights27/06/24 07:59 PM
2

Pinkhair /pĭngkhâr/ noun A terminally online person who is perpetually offended by anyone and anything not closely hewing to the PC playbook of acceptable behavior created by expert gender studies academics. Can often be seen spending hours a day analyzing various online communities for examples of said PC playbook infractions.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/05/24 12:37 PM
1

That's interesting - any more I can read about the methodology she used?
/r/MensRights18/01/24 07:18 PM
2

Upvoted 10 times in an hour. Seriously no one has a problem with the idea of sending men to concentration camps! "Oh we were just having a laugh!" Or something.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 05:32 AM
2

I made a very sarcastic troll post about an hour ago on a women's sub about how much I despised all men and wanted to send them to concentration camps (expecting to be banned) but the OP upvoted me and said very true and laughing emojis. Seriously, I know I'm not allowed to link comments here but feel free to go through my comments to find it.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 04:31 AM
4

We're any of those comments saved? I constantly get told by people that misandry "just doesn't exist" here, it's just fragile men. But that is heinous and should be shown to everyone.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 06:17 AM
30

They're living in a fantasy land perpetuated by online echo chambers that tell them men are supposed to kowtow to them at all times, otherwise they're misogynist. It's bizarre.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 06:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter