eddycaplan Archive

Upvotes	Title	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
147	Louisiana rape law: Yes if it's a woman, No if it's a man.	eddycaplan	/r/MensRights	20/04/13 02:49 AM
121	Gender Bias in Criminal Sentencing Six Times as Large as Racial Bias	eddycaplan	/r/MensRights	16/01/13 04:46 AM
41	Noam Chomsky explains feminist critiques of the hard sciences, in one minute.	eddycaplan	/r/MensRights	20/04/13 04:10 AM
4	Interesting Opposition to Women in Combat: Why Politically-Driven "Equality" Will Require Lowering Standards	eddycaplan	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 10:07 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	So I was looking through the job listings today...is this even legal? In Washington state (where the posted job was), the anti-sex discrimination in employment statute at least covers businesses with over 8 employees. Though presumably craigslist can be seen in all 50 states. If another state had stricter rules on sex-discriminatory job postings, it's possible the poster could get in trouble there too.	/r/MensRights	28/04/13 08:34 AM
4	Nice to see some pushback against the feminists trying to take over the gaming / nerdy community That analogy was kinda funny though.	/r/MensRights	24/04/13 01:11 AM
1	Louisiana rape law: Yes if it's a woman, No if it's a man. The statute is listing particular reasons why there was no consent, for example "[w]hen the victim is incapable of ... understanding the nature of the act by reason of a stupor ... produced by an intoxicating agent ..." If you don't understand what's going on, you can't consent to it. You don't have to say "no" not to consent to something. If there was no consent for another reason, for example because she was threatened with serious bodily harm, then you're right that crime would fall under a d…	/r/MensRights	20/04/13 09:52 PM
1	Louisiana rape law: Yes if it's a woman, No if it's a man. Yeah, there are several types of rape under Louisiana law. I linked to Simple Rape because it was partly non-gender neutral. However, Simple Rape, like all rape in Louisiana, is without consent. From subsection (A) the statute: Simple rape is a rape committed when the anal, oral, or vaginal sexual intercourse is deemed to be without the lawful consent of a victim because it is committed under any one or more of the following circumstances: (bold added)	/r/MensRights	20/04/13 07:40 PM
7	Noam Chomsky explains feminist critiques of the hard sciences, in one minute. I'm not sure I would consider Noam Chomsky "anti-intellectual." His own field of linguistics is a "soft" science which traditionally drew from the Humanities.	/r/MensRights	20/04/13 06:32 AM
7	Noam Chomsky explains feminist critiques of the hard sciences, in one minute. Richard Dawkins gives some, in a video already posted. He cites, for example, a feminist critique of Newton's Principia as a "rape manual."	/r/MensRights	20/04/13 05:49 AM
7	Noam Chomsky explains feminist critiques of the hard sciences, in one minute. A well-known linguist and intellectual.	/r/MensRights	20/04/13 05:37 AM
7	More "are you a rapist?" consent roulette. Don't worry guys, if the police arrest you, then you know she didn't consent back when it seemed like she did. It might mean they would dislike a guy constantly asking for consent, as is proposed.	/r/MensRights	20/04/13 04:30 AM
17	Louisiana rape law: Yes if it's a woman, No if it's a man. Check out subsection (3): Simple rape occurs When the female victim submits under the belief that the person committing the act is her husband and such belief is intentionally induced by any artifice, pretense, or concealment practiced by the offender. Louisiana has one of the broadest rape laws in the country, including the death penalty for certain offenses. Yet it chose not to protect deceived husbands as it does deceived wives. While I'm not sure this happens often, if sex based on deception…	/r/MensRights	20/04/13 03:56 AM
0	support criminalization of custodial parents whom do not honor custody and visitation guidelines set in Family Court. \| We the People: Your Voice in Our Government There is no federal family law in the U.S. It's all done at the state level. So even if the President agreed with this, he would have to persuade state legislatures if he wanted anything done. Why not just ask them yourselves?	/r/MensRights	17/04/13 12:39 AM
1	Feminists tell female sex workers "go rape yourself." Yet another highlight in the Feminist "equality" movement. (Video may be NSFW) meh FEMEN has protested all sorts of things and only gets attention because they go topless. They have no coherent message. They're just a few confused, attention-seeking girls from Ukraine who aren't a threat to anybody. I mostly just feel sorry for them.	/r/MensRights	04/04/13 03:15 AM
2	When did this outrage towards nice guys start? What the hell? It's in their interest to mislead. Claiming they like "nice guys" gets women an almost endless supply of hapless nerd-slaves, while acknowledging they actually prefer "bad boys" would make them look like douches and encourage guys to treat them badly.	/r/MensRights	26/01/13 10:23 AM
3	Interesting Opposition to Women in Combat: Why Politically-Driven "Equality" Will Require Lowering Standards The administration has promised that there will be no reduction of physical standards to accommodate women in combat roles, but that promise almost certainly is false[.] The political mandate to integrate women into the military had disastrous consequences for standards at West Point[.] The use of “gender-specific” physical standards meant that female candidates were given passing marks on tests when underperforming their male counterparts on such common benchmarks as push-ups, sit-ups, and runn…	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 10:20 AM
5	Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk? I doubt the law excuses something that would otherwise be rape because the rapist was "intoxicated." The real answer to the general question is that the law doesn't excuse the behavior because the person chose to get drunk, and excusing drunk behavior would give bad incentives to people. The situation is different, for example, with alcoholics who are thought to not "control" their drinking.	/r/MensRights	19/01/13 10:42 AM
10	Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk? really the only way to be charged with any crime due to drunken sex is when one party is not intoxicated. Untrue. The rest follows logically from this, and is equally untrue.	/r/MensRights	19/01/13 10:29 AM
2	"The idea that women dislike being financially dependent on men is a myth, with more choosing to 'marry up' now than did so in the 1940s" according to Dr Catherine Hakim from the London School of Econ Link to the actual report.	/r/MensRights	18/01/13 02:48 AM
2	Gender Bias in Criminal Sentencing Six Times as Large as Racial Bias Thanks for posting it here too. Both the gender gap and racial gap papers are also linked in the first paragraph of the article.	/r/MensRights	16/01/13 09:08 AM
31	Gender Bias in Criminal Sentencing Six Times as Large as Racial Bias After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, "men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do," and "[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted." This gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity that Prof. Starr found in another recent paper.... "About one in every fifty American men is currently behind bars, and we could think about gender disparity as perhaps being a key dimension of that problem.…	/r/MensRights	16/01/13 05:17 AM
23	It's stuff like this that makes me sick ...is fantastic.	/r/MensRights	11/01/13 08:12 AM