TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

edwardpuppyhands Archive

View 2 posts and 526 comments by edwardpuppyhands on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You've implicated either that you watch an excessive amount and high variety of porn to be able to credibly assert what "most porn" has, or you watch a small amount/variety and that you're just making shit up. Either way it's a 🤡🤡🤡 take. Also, most people don't watch porn regularly, and some practically never. Not that there's anything wrong with watching porn in itself, but it's another instance of you thinking you have a grasp on the broad public when you don't actually know WTF you're talking…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 06:18 AM
1

😂😂😂😂 You're telling me to read, when the main text of the original post talks about "raep" several times and nothing about consensual non-consent, yet you make like 3 comments about CNC. You're either responding to the wrong thread, or you're purporting that these women saying they have rape fantasies shouldn't be believed at their word. I agree with u/jonmyjon's comment that you ignored, that you seem to have your wires crossed. And you're clearly not a friendly person 😉😉😉😉
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 06:09 AM
1

What are you doing with your life to know what "most porn" has? 😂😂 Especially seeming that you don't even like most of it, wtf 😂😂😂 And I guess you're unaware that variations of the scenario you describe here is common in female written erotica, just with more 🌷🌸flowery language and descriptions🌺🌼
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 06:30 AM
1

😂😂 You imagining things that the op didn't actually say, while also implicating that women shouldn't be believed at their word as a woman yourself, my god 😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 06:05 AM
1

Male celebs and fictional characters that would be most considered ladies' men would generally not be considered narcissists. Alpha bro energy, most of them, but that's not synonymous with narcissism.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 12:44 PM
1

No, Walmart slants moderately low class but only relative to surrounding area since proximity a huge factor in grocery shopping location, thus lower class in a high class area is middle class. Similarly, a middle tier grocery store in an upper class area will predominantly feature the average of the people in that area -- the middle of the upper class. This concept applies to many stores and restaurants. I've used it to cherry-pick a fast food venue (low class in a vacuum) in a nice area.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 10:28 PM
1

I'll amend my OP to say that a Walmart in a higher-scale area should be pretty representative, otherwise your casual grocery stores (not in a particular good or bad area).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 10:21 PM
0

Just what I said at face value.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 09:19 PM
1

Yeah, if you're not confident in your social game than leveling up in the activity itself first is probably the best strategy. Getting better at the activity will give you confidence, you can learn what the people (mostly women) there are like more organically, and also have more time to more efficiently identify good matches (including friendships).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 08:34 PM
1

Don't come across like you're solely there to meet women. Just focus on the activity, at least at first.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 08:27 PM
1

I've lost count of all of the trolls I've had to block that immediately resort to personal attacks the second I make a solid point that they can't refute. I've found that as far as subreddits go, PPD is particularly well-moderated on civility. Posts don't even need to be especially rude to get mod-sniped, usually. ​ Also, i think it's well known that dating apps have ruined dating but what is alternative? Activities and venues that have good female-male ratios. I think there were a few posts abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 08:00 PM
1

where women in their 20s make 93 cents on the dollar compared to men in their 20s. I believe I read that when accounting for job type and hours worked that the overall income ratio of women to men was 91%, and 20-something women might've earned slightly more than 100%.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 07:55 PM
1

A note about the attractiveness study are that it's not quite apples-to-oranges since women don't focus on looks to the extent that men do, and are generally slower to become attracted to someone (but then their incumbent attraction is stronger).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 07:46 PM
1

Not the OP, but most OLD is probably much worse for people with lower SMV, who are most of the victims OP's analysis touches on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 08:06 PM
2

Target's supposed to be more upscale and pricier than Walmart. There are grocery stores that are more middling and get plenty of traffic; I'm referring to those.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 07:53 PM
1

I'm not the OP, but what intramural sports did you play? I'm most into basketball but it's overwhelmingly male.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 07:15 PM
1

I've been to average-sized grocery stores that had only slightly higher prices. I'll amend my OP that a Walmart in a higher-class area will probably be pretty representative of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 07:02 PM
2

One could argue that's more funny than depressing ;-p
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 10:41 PM
1

TBF, Walmart's not what I would say hold's the average population sample.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 08:07 PM
6

Walmart's a great place to grocery-shop if you have self-esteem problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 08:05 PM
0

My opinions pertaining to feminism were from my own experience. I understand why you probably wouldn't know well as a woman, but I've observed a somewhat tight correlation between feminism and misandry (and neuroticism, for that matter). Feminism I've also observed to be very decentralized, so there's definitely no broad paint brush that should be used, but =fervent= feminists are almost always misandrist, neurotic, and high on the narcissism spectrum, IME.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 01:19 PM
2

u/mahangirasa I looked through your post history a bit and found you had a few really good write-ups. A few questions. This account of yours is probably an alt, though whether you're new to Reddit or not what's the deal there? What's your gender and age, if you're comfortable answering? What do you do for work, considering your write-ups seem Masters or even PhD quality? While I've gotten romantically acquainted with people I've met over the internet, I've never used dating aps, and your write-u…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 11:29 AM
0

TRP is a unique bunch with similar narcissism to fervent feminists, so I'm not especially referring to them, but Scandinavian women tending to being pretty relaxed about casual romance and splitting finances will appeal to many Western men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 10:17 AM
1

TBF, Scandinavian women keep most of the upsides of traditionally feminine women compared to typical feminists as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 05:50 AM
4

I'm not red pill, but their material is meant to apply to men only, AFAIK.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 05:44 AM
1

I feel like I don’t bother approaching women anymore or push away women clearly who are interested in me because I can’t tell if they’re worth committing to or are they chatting up 7 different guys currently. First, the type of woman who gets that much attention is a 9 or a 10, who I have enough info to infer is out of your league anyway :-p Second, I'll tell you similar to what I told OP that you'll weed out the good majority of prospective partners who aren't taking you seriously by taking it …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 07:15 AM
3

u/anon018274031 : a lot of the risk can be eliminated by having prospective LTR partners be friends first and taking it slow. Men tend to rush into sexual acts, while women tend to want to rush into long-term couplings. Check yourself from doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:53 PM
3

Could be the case for casual romance, but for LTRs that aren't BDSM in nature it'll cause problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 04:46 PM
1

Being vulnerable means revealing insecurities, showing uncontrolled emotion, literally being open to being hurt by the other party. Simply beckoning a friendship with someone does that to some level, and a romantic relationship more so. ​ I've seen multi-decade long relationships without the faintest hint of that I mean people typically doesn't advertise those things. ​ Right, but what are the tangible benefits of "being vulnerable" to someone? Aside from the replies in your other exchange, expo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 08:05 AM
2

Many "suicide attempts" in general, and more often used by women, should be used in quotey fingers since they amount to more to significant self-harm and a cry for help than a genuine attempt to kill themselves. More evidence of this is someone who really wants to die normally shouldn't be deterred by a failed attempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 06:36 AM
5

Is it set in stone concrete that all women freak out when their man tells her his emotions? No. I have known women who are pretty good about it. I've heard of men women telling them off to their face about them showing vulnerability, but in my experience it overwhelmingly manifests as lower interest: less response to texts, calls, less enthused in conversations. It's frequent enough where I would say it's my top complaint of dealing with woman, probably biased because I'm an HSP, but it's defini…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 06:26 AM
9

Do women even still tell men to share their feels? Man here; I've heard a version of this from women more than a few times, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 05:19 AM
1

How do you know it's not just women being more emotional, as they're apt to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 04:11 AM
3

So what is a woman's value to you in a relationship, especially the higher risk LTRs carry for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 06:48 PM
2

My experience with women by age in broader sample sizes is generally the opposite. Some nuance: women of much different age than my own will be less prone to want an LTR, though middle-aged women are way more open to casual romance and flirting than 20-somethings. I would guess a lot of it for you is that the type of older women who go to resorts are much different from the type of young women?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 06:28 PM
2

I can tell you from what I've seen across Reddit that nearly every sub that focuses on support of or the opposite criticizing one gender will have a lot of one-way sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 06:02 PM
3

Yeah, you suggested NEVER showing vulnerability to your partner. I disagree, yes. ​ Women cant deal with your problems and will be turned off. She’s not there for you to have someone to listen too Those are standard two-way duties of LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:58 PM
-1

See my follow-up post I just finished.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:57 PM
2

Yeah, like I do agree with him in the sense that women punishing men for showing sensitive emotions is a broad societal problem, as I've experienced it myself, it encourages toxic masculinity, but the way OP's describing it sounds like more blatant toxic femininity than what I've experienced as one with HSP and what I generally hear from other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:55 PM
1

Fair enough ✌
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:42 PM
1

Historically women have had to rely on social navigation and manipulation more (for survival) so most have been raised to be more obsessed with it. This is at least not true of the most recent 1-2 generations of females in the First World.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:40 PM
1

IME, women who grew up in such a conservative culture tend to be more personable and accepting of it later in life. I've inferred that women who were coddled by their father in particular seem to be less personable and more entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:37 PM
1

The therapist and psychologists agreed that it was rather rare, and almost as a side note none of them could think of a single case where an abusive women had got to that stage of accepting guilt. As opposed to men? Seriously curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:29 PM
1

Admitting fault often has no serious consequences and usually improves the relationship with the other party.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:21 PM
1

How? At minimum it keeps bad men (some sentences are pretty unjust, but generally speaking) out of the dating people from prospective women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:18 PM
1

I'll ask about both those statements. Have you done any research into your match with psychopathy or sociopathy? And elaborate on these women turning, and how you think it's so different from what men do?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:13 PM
1

Do you mind elaborating (further) about what get of value here? I'd imagine the vast majority of what's discussed isn't something you can relate to, or... ?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:12 PM
2

You're promoting hardcore antisocial personality disorder. I touched on in another comment that Donald Trump is the rare checks-all-the-boxes extreme narcissist, and he might have the most turmoil in his inner circle, including his wife, of any POTUS ever. People with strong cases of ASPD virtually always have more personal problems than most people, even if it's an advantage in some areas. Showing too much vulnerability and/or too early is bad, but the opposite extreme is also bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:09 PM
2

It's highly likely part of that is the type of women you're pursuing. It's normal for people's LTR partners to share most traits, often down to some pretty obscure traits. This isn't to say you should spill too much or too early (I've made these mistakes myself).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:05 PM
1

You never show weakness ever. This is extreme narcissism. Donald Trump is an extreme narcissist, and, politics aside, he might be the most disliked POTUS from his own inner circle ever, including his wife. About your EMT experience, what I strongly suspect to be an element is that you're used to horrific injuries and/or you're high on the psychopathy spectrum where you're naturally hard to disgust, and you're interpreting reactions that the solid majority of people with their background would re…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 04:39 PM
1

I'm curious what attracts you to this forum as one with the conservative background of marrying and still being with your first major relationship partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 04:32 PM
1

That doesn't apply here. The debate wasn't about anyone's perception but what they actually are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 09:20 PM
1

I was talking about what people actually are, not what assumptions are made by onlookers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 06:02 PM
1

Clubs will at least have the advantage of good F-M ratios, and you can get decent exercise with dancing. Go to at least a few, stick with the couple that you most vibe with, don't take interactions with the (often drunk) women too seriously. About your politics, do you mean that your opinions are too scattered to fit well in any one group, or... ? Meetup.com and local Facebook groups could work well. All this said, the middle of the Bible belt is going to be bad with the intellectual makeup of a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 09:28 PM
1

Then you're making a pretty good income to where money's not a problem for you in courting women, like it is for many other men, anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 11:46 PM
1

Where'd you get any more than the unusual case being middle-aged? Serious question. I've inferred most people here are young because of the way they talk about SMV and romantic goals (that women have way better odds, which is sort of true at young ages but eventually reverses itself, and prioritizing casual sex over LTRs).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 10:53 PM
1

It's full of young adults, where women are predominantly in their SMV prime and most men are at their SMV low.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 01:11 PM
1

Lol. My initial response to your OP was, "uhhh?"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 05:56 AM
1

I think which way a bisexual “leans” is more variable than changing true sexuality. Not sure but am sure you can’t change your real sexuality. A bisexual is a bisexual and a gay is a gay. Lesbians won’t be attracted to men. This contradicts both scientific inquiry I've read and my own experience, as I've discussed. ​ Bisexual men aren’t fully gay if they can be attracted to women and gay men can be like yuck no men only. That's why the Kinsey Scale and such exists. There's a spectrum aspect to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 12:57 AM
1

I think OP and you are generally in agreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 11:41 PM
5

A wholesome PPD moment. Awww...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 11:25 PM
0

Feel free to put those women in their place, bro. So many people in the First World have come to think it's okay to dehumanize men, these women know they're being a-holes... don't have a meltdown over it, but especially in that first situation light those bitches up. Look at it as you'll be doing other men they deal with a favor. I'll give some nuance in the second scenario since you and your friend approached them: if you regularly hang out with the dude, have a conversation with him about appr…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 11:22 PM
4

I've read of studies finding bisexuality to usually work differently for men and women. For instance: Most women who profess bisexuality lean straight, while most such men lean gay. Women's sexuality is more fluid in general (though straight-leaning women won't become gay-leaning, as I discussed). There are more bisexual women than bisexual men, but more gay men than gay women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 11:12 PM
1

This doesn't contradict anything I said. Reply to wrong post?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 11:10 PM
2

What I've inferred from observation and conversations over time is emotional people are more sexually flexible, women are more sexually flexible, but then everyone leans toward either hetero or gay even back to early childhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 10:30 PM
0

I think women are more age-sensitive than men. One important thing about that data is that they're only of a few big cities, which slant slightly more female than the country at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 10:00 PM
-1

That's only kind of true of young adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 08:42 AM
2

Okay, not entirely the most surprising place this would happened, but there should be other social circles or activities you can find that'll have a higher class of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 03:46 AM
1

What metro area is this? What do you predominantly do to meet women?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 01:57 AM
1

Sure: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/online-dating-out-of-your-league/567083/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 01:17 AM
1

Going to copy what I said in another comment here: I think it would help you enjoy dates a lot more if you focused more on having a good time instead of thinking the dates as interviews. You can infer a fair bit about someone from the way they go about themselves regardless of the conversation topics, and someone who's fun to be around you'll generally want to go on a few dates with where you can find out more about them organically anyway. Also in your instance, shy away from dating aps that le…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 01:11 AM
1

who at least has her shit together well enough to make it through a single date without passing out drunk, starting a fight, or winding up in jail. 😅😅 In retrospect, what have you found out about what you were doing that lead to meeting up with women who did that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 01:04 AM
1

I think it would help you enjoy dates a lot more if you focused more on having a good time instead of thinking the dates as interviews. You can infer a fair bit about someone from the way they go about themselves regardless of the conversation topics, and someone who's fun to be around you'll generally want to go on a few dates with where you can find out more about them organically anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 12:59 AM
0

Something about you is encouraging that. Ask some dudes who know you personally about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 12:46 AM
1

According to the full article I pulled that from, the ratings were based on some calculation of messages sent and replied to on a free "popular" dating ap.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 12:40 AM
1

Cis het men on average do get elevating SMV, relative to their age group, up to middle age.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 11:20 PM
1

Fair. I think it would help a lot if you make a point not to be serious committal with someone at least for a month, preferably several, including that you go on dates with other people. This most closely resembles 'casual dating.' I've found from experience that there are many women who'll want to get serious as soon as one good date, so it's a good idea to bring this up pretty quickly. This is even a better strategy in modern times than before b/c of the prevalence of online-dating and the num…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 09:38 PM
4

Can you elaborate on what you define as "dating" and why it's unpleasant for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 07:57 PM
1

This sub is one of the worst places for discourse about this topic in particular. If a woman based her view of men on the comments in this sub she would think men only value her pussy 100%. This is one of the few subs on Reddit you will get upvoted for a comment like: "Education doesn't make women more attractive. You can't fuck a degree" There are many red pillers here. But you also have a lot of rationally-minded people, and the moderation is good. Your comment is critical of those people yet …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 10:29 AM
2

“I know i said i dont you need to parent them but now i kinda do” Followed by (sometime later): “They are MY kids not yours!” [...] Even the kids themselves (being kids) will rebel and throw the “not my REAL dad” in your face and it will hurt because it is true. I see it as very important here that (1) the single parent's romance interest avoids getting seriously invested in the kid(s) until the new romance is on firm foundation, including that the parent doesn't solicit the romance interest's i…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 10:18 AM
12

You need advanced knowledge of a couple to be able to give any accurate a verdict of "beta buxxing."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 09:59 AM
7

Women are perceived as more desirable the less promiscuous they are Interestingly, most of the women replying to OP's question here are have mostly gotten shit for it to some degree. One of them said some guys near her age specifically didn't like it: "They didn’t want to deal with the bleeding, the perceived clinginess to follow, the lack of experience, or the pressure." Religiously pious men of course won't like promiscuousness of any kind. ​ men are seen as less desirable the less they have s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 06:06 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/affe8q/desirability_rank_of_men_and_women_by_age_oc/ https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2015/07/03/ok-cupid-data-on-sex-desirability-and-age/ Page of a few charts, of which I have a few comments. So the most common age of OKCupid users is 24, according to the first chart. If you scroll down to the first "the shape of the dating pool" chart for 21 YO's, you can see that there's way more competition for women than men. Scroll down to the like-ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 02:18 AM
0

How is this relevant to my point? Blue collar workers are a much higher ratio in population in rural vs. urban regions. Urban populations are broadly more productive per capita; this casts strong evidence against your assertion, "blue collar men especially put their bodies through the ringer and fuel most of America’s productive capacity." And I can ask you basically what you asked me: why did you even bring that up? It doesn't in any way address why such people would be against egalitarian atti…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 02:00 AM
1

Men can make it highly unlikely that there's a pregnancy through contraception. Then there are pregnancies neither partner wanted. Then some couples mutually want pregnancy only later. Left vs. right wing legislation can affect these options, even down to contraception availability, so it is significant to young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 01:45 AM
5

TBF, many dudes here do the same shit about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:37 AM
7

First, college-age people and younger are on aggregate considerably more liberal than middle aged and the elderly in developed nations; I believe predominantly due to social issues preferences. Moving on... Minimum wage policy potentially affects young people far more than older age brackets. People of all backgrounds benefit from higher infrastructure spending. Leftist economic policy tends to make cheaper advanced education and training, which benefit young people more. Developed nations are g…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:03 AM
1

✌✌
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:26 AM
-1

blue collar men especially put their bodies through the ringer and fuel most of America’s productive capacity. Urban centers have higher GDP per capitas than rural and suburban regions. ​ I certainly would not be enthused to fund programs that have little to no personal relevance if I was working doubles at an oil rig. Oil rig workers are where a blue collar worker can make bank, but that's a tiny percentage; the vast majority of blue collar workers pay little to no extra taxes for liberal econo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:01 AM
5

u/EntertainerUseful408 there are a lot of dudes here who don't have broadly bad attitudes toward women, which your question doesn't isolate for.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 11:32 PM
1

Why did you get with her initially, and how did your assumptions turn out to be wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 11:40 AM
1

In objective analysis of your avatar, I presume part of someone becoming your romantic partner is agreeing to you reaping their soul?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 11:35 AM
1

Considering how well-off you are, what brings you to this sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 11:25 AM
6

People with a non-superficial interest here tend to be above-average intelligence, have interest in depth, and for women they need a thick skin to tolerate the male majority (mostly red and black pillers). Those things are plusses to me. But I would deep-dive their post history, where it could quickly become a negative.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 11:11 AM
1

I LOLed at the thread title.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 11:07 AM
1

Just simply they end because of Ego. The guy usually feeling some type of way because of their lack of success in comparison to their woman. If sex gets cut out as the only motivation to poly, men aren't at any disadvantage to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:28 PM
3

Sex isn't the only reason to want to enter into some type of open relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:21 PM
4

he's not gonna be near as great as macking as his early years This depends on what made him a chad early on, including how he's keeping up his social skills. The romance market gradually tilts toward men starting from 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:20 PM
1

^ Found OP's fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 08:53 AM
1

Have you not looked at their actual posts??
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 04:27 PM
1

with unfairly applied rules LOL. What's unfair is that r/femaledatingstrategypros was banned ;'( That sub was hilarious. ​ If I find out more I’ll lyk ty bbz
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 12:12 PM
1

Earlier I came upon an article on FDS's website about their reasons; advertiser-friendly pressuring from Reddit admins wasn't mentioned in the bulleted summary to the podcast, though it could've been left out.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 12:03 PM
1

The abusive, traumatizing messages and porn they were getting sent on the daily. I mean... this is kinda like feeling sorry for a serial killer getting raped in prison.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:52 AM
1

They’re going to start infiltrating this sub and pick fights with the incel/mgtow leftovers. I don't know how true this will be, but at least the mods here enforce civility pretty good. ​ And no, I never used it they didn’t let me post. I found their podcast and it was a whole lot of terrible nonsense Mind elaborating?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:23 AM
1

Aside from that FDS has their own website, the subreddit revolved around bigotry and narcissism, so I think you have little to worry about what wholesome socializing will be lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:19 AM
1

Unfortunately, they left Reddit voluntarily, though someone alleged that they were getting pressure from Reddit admins. They have their own website, which they're apparently shifting focus to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:17 AM
1

#1 We're talking about a colloquialism; UD is possibly the best source for such a term. #2 The site ranks results by upvotes and UV-DV ratio, so the top results you see aren't simply "one random person's definition," but a broadly approved one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:34 AM
1

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Femcel
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:11 AM
1

The way "incel" has evolved, the word and its deviations also refer to people struggling to get a romantic relationship more broadly (with neurotic or angry ways of coping).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 06:43 AM
1

I've been married for ten years but a lot of the generic stuff I saw them post seemed basically fine to me. What were you looking at to conclude this? I once did an analysis of the first 15 threads there, sorted by "hot"; 11 of them were vapid man-bashing, and only 1 had what I would describe as any wholesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 06:42 AM
3

All women are FDS, it’s just a matter of honesty and to what degree. I'm male, but most of my relationships, from acquaintance to lover, have been female, and I strongly disagree with this. From what I could infer, most FDSers are both high in ASPD themselves and most associate with those high on the spectrum. I've never seen a broad level of selfishness and vitriol toward men before encountering FDS, on smaller levels or otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 06:34 AM
1

At least one Reddit global moderator admitted that they don't care about prejudice against "white people or men as a group."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 06:23 AM
1

They were told off by admins, they're a few subs in the last week that spoke openly about the admins applying pressure to them and applying an ultimatum. I think the same thing happened to a sub called TheMotte a few days ago. I would love to see some of the citations for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 06:17 AM
1

allegedly they were instructed by Reddit to be more advertiser friendly. I'm pretty curious of the source on this, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 12:13 AM
-1

A little jealous, yes, and that jealousy can be used to motivate growth. Bitter, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:18 AM
6

I really don’t think that’s unique to men tbh both misandry and misogyny have grown a lot online. You are the chosen one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:17 AM
1

You're not going to get very valuable data from a group who, from the time they can understand it, have been told clearly that "good girls don't" regarding nearly everything that has to do with sex. My OP has nothing to do with anything I've learned from this community. I've argued against men here too. ​ But it's not natural that one half of the human race wouldn't be as enthusiastic about sex as the other. That's what studies into libido habits by gender broadly show. What I suspect the reason…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 07:33 AM
1

men are also proven to have significantly more orgasms over women during heterosexual sex. there’s already an orgasm gap. Right, it appears both that sex is more physically pleasurable for men, and that men want much more sexual activity. Even in gay relationships, men tend to have considerably more sex than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 07:27 AM
2

Getting back to this late, but I've since come across this exchange, where a Reddit global moderator admits that their rules on harassment and discrimination don't pertain to "white people or men as a group." This now unequivocally proves that the sole reason that FDS and like-groups are allowed to be openly prejudicial, including calls for violence, against men is that Reddit's executives openly don't care. ​ you haven't proven that FDS calls for violence either. Did you forget what we were arg…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 07:03 AM
1

just imagine your housekeeper and nanny asked you to pay in full after a decade of not paying. A SAHM is getting her rent/mortgage paid, plus food and a degree of recreational expenses -- literally what a live-in nanny would get. And her recreational allowance is pretty big in some cases. And if you actually watched the video, the attorney implicating SAHMs stalling, costing the couple more legal fees, which is the opposite of what you want to do if you're trying to maximize your payout in a div…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:22 AM
7

We're talking SAHMs, so presumably it was usually planned from the outset, including that the lady would handle the vast majority of household work. And the topic was in regards to difficulty from the man's side in divorces. Watch the short video. I think a relationship arrangement where one partner's a SAH can work, but it's got to be for good reason and with strong planning.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:35 PM
1

What's your nationality, and how would you describe your subculture?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 04:16 AM
1

I mean apparently some people do have some checklist aspect to choosing their friends. Hell, on a larger scale it's a major aspect of prejudice.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 05:23 PM
1

As an American, I generally agree with u/NockerJoe. It's significant that roasting style of humor is somewhat common overall here, and very common in certain social circles, "black culture" being one of them. My girlfriend is eastern Asian in origin, I have some knowledge of the broad culture there enough to know not to make this sort of joke there, but here it'd be acceptable, at least among many social circles. Chris Rock is a long-time comedian who's especially known for a roasting-style humo…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 07:20 PM
0

My OP implicated the difference between someone being physically attracted to someone and wanting an LTR with them, your reply as I understood it asked why the former wouldn't automatically lead to the latter, and I replied to that point. High physical attraction is sometimes justification for a friendship or acquaintanceship alone, e.g. verbal flirting, cuddling, sex; but for various reasons it's agreed that there's not enough to justify an LTR. If you like her personality on a friendship basis…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 05:57 PM
0

Yay, wholesome teaching moment. The answer, based on plenty of my own experience, is because the things that physically attract one person to another don't necessarily have much connection to long-term compatibility, and sometimes none. Physical attraction matters for an LTR, but I'm not sure if should even take 50% precedence.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 04:54 PM
2

You're rambling and making unproven assertions. A call to violence is clearly against Reddit's first global rule, and you were unable to show any other sub that made a call to violence (and has the long track record of toxicity that FDS has) that hasn't been quarantined or banned. What I said stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 01:31 PM
1

I think OP's talking about males who write off females as friends right away solely b/c they are female.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 01:22 PM
2

Reddit higher-ups have a broad left-wing slant with everything, including selective enforcement of anti-racism. They used to be broadly lenient years ago, which quite likely explains why it took a while for the crack-down. Reddit global rules ban violence in the very first rule. Otherwise, what I said stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 01:11 PM
4

Your word, "draining," and the context you used it in implies personal experience. If that's not present tense, then adjust my OP to mean past tense, the general point still applies.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 01:06 PM
2

everyone feels sorry for will. I've read almost nothing to this effect, and I've specifically Googled into commentary and reactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 01:04 PM
1

K. Well Will Smith did something that Chris Rock could've had him arrested for, something that Will could've privately handled with Chris afterward, or failing that gestured or more casually objected during Chris's stand-up. It's also particularly dumb in Will's instance because of the likely significant career damage this will have.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 01:03 PM
1

jade gave him the stink eye and forced him to take action because she is insulted ? Like why couldn't she take action herself if she is offended ? Based on the video clip I saw twice, there wasn't a shot of obvious offense and gesturing of her toward Will to do something. Many people in the thread are making assumptions where we're missing information.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 12:37 PM
1

How cool would you be if to a woman feeling highly offended by something you said to her, her boyfriend slapped you and screamed at you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 12:34 PM
3

Nobody is asking how chris is right now. The social media response from celebrities on the matter is overwhelmingly tilted in Chris Rock's favor, at least to the extent of not particularly criticizing him for the joke and being highly critical of Will.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 12:21 PM
1

Sucker-slap*
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 12:19 PM
6

Sigh. Yeah, we know you will. Try and find a woman who hasn’t served as a counselor, nurse, mommy, and bangmaid for a boyfriend. Most men view women as a Swiss Army carer and it’s fucking draining. If the burden in your LTR is this one-sided, either you're not communicating well to your partner your needs, or you're with the wrong partner. Good luck figuring it out in any case.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:54 AM
-3

I presume all your hobbies are male-dominated, and that and small chat is all you know how to talk about with someone? That's underdeveloped conversational skill. This is typical of someone pretty young, or superficial social experience. E.g. is having a multi-hour conversation even with people you know well difficult for you? If not difficult with males, what's the subject material that doesn't translate to females?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:38 AM
12

male threshold for attraction is significantly lower than female threshold. This should be clarified that it's true in a superficial, physical attraction sense, but men are pickier about desiring long-term relationships on the other end. Also to u/ThrowAwayBro737
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:20 AM
2

A call to violence is very rare anywhere on Reddit and should be taken seriously. FDS makes posts of this level of extremism and toxicity on the regular. Try to cite a single male-centric subreddit that's done similar and isn't already quarantined or banned. I'm left-leaning myself, but have noticed Reddit senior staff play favorites with letting left-leaning subs get away with despicable behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:11 AM
6

I’m always amused by how PPD people are somehow able to figure out the size of a guy’s bank account and his dick https://preview.redd.it/56dih54b8ix61.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=ea14cbd816a52da1285e19113ff962f280d9a5e3
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 07:16 PM
1

He just suggested younger women, didn't say anything about 20 year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 12:31 AM
1

That's typical of 20 years olds since most people at the age are single, and women more than men since they're usually in their SMV prime. ​ Moves to 5-10 once we hit ~30ish. From your earlier post, I generally agree with this. How come you accused the OP of preying on younger women when they basically said this?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 11:06 PM
1

If you anticipate women being adverse to admitting that money and/or high social status turns them on, it didn't occur to you that this would benefit YOUR argument? This nonsensical retort confirms my suspicion in why I said not to write again until you set up the survey in the first place: that you're being in fair part disingenuous, that you don't believe in your own claims enough to put them to the test (and you're a red piller being scared of female online comments?). I've noticed this to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 03:23 PM
1

I didn't read. I will when you follow the instruction in my last paragraph, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 02:34 PM
1

Agreed. But that disproves that she is invested IN HIM. Yes it does. If I have high appreciation for the things a person does that directly benefit me, in any context, I'm going to be invested in them personally, #1 for pure appreciation, #2 because I want them to keep giving me that benefit or even improve on it. ​ She didn't find him attractive earlier. So they didn't meet before, so we don't know. She said she would've liked his personality at minimum then. We know she didn't find him especia…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 11:57 AM
1

That's the evidence she is invested for what he can do. As a physician, he pretty much guarantees a stable job, family & marital status. Okay I misread what you said. That's in good part routine for post-college cis het relationships. ​ Didn't know reading minds is the only way to interpret someone's intentions. Not at all possible to extrapolate intentions from actions right? You didn't back up your opinion that she doesn't love him. I read her two posts in full and didn't see overt evidence of…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 10:07 AM
1

No they don't. Bad bot.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:44 AM
1

She is invested alright. But not in the guy but for what the guy can do for her. What external evidence is there of this? The external evidence present shows the opposite to me: based on the time frame she gave, they started dating when he was already a physician or about to become one. ​ Chosen because working in high-esteemed profession making good money, financially stable etc. Not because she is in love with him. ??? Dude, if you could read minds like that, you'd have better things to do tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:41 AM
2

There's a significant minority of both genders who are okay with age differences of more than a few years, I've found.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:35 AM
-1

Not just the money, but the profession is highly regarded. "Beta Bux" doesn't really fit here based on the evidence. ​ If he wasn’t a doctor, would she have ended up with him on his “personality” alone? We don't know. We also don't know if basketball guy had a good personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 11:43 PM
0

Only true in accordance with what I said. To your last bit, it's presumably b/c you perceive to have few options.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 11:14 PM
7

TBF, women are quite typically most attracted to (slightly) older men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 11:09 PM
4

I still looked damn good in a bikini. Pix or it didn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 11:07 PM
0

Being a physician by itself is a big chick magnet.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 10:51 PM
-1

It's important to note that she's probably not settling for him. He's now a physician, and she implied that she also generally likes his personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 10:39 PM
3

The man being a physician is a big deal, and that they've only been dating for ~2 years. It's pretty unlikely she's settling.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 10:35 PM
4

To my understanding, those claiming that the woman's settling interpret that she's a bit older and not dating a jock-type guy like in the photo. This might've been possible without knowing more information, but throughout her posts she seems pretty invested in the guy, and the man is a physician -- arguably the highest-esteemed profession in the world. The dude was being a bit of a dick about his comments about her old picture, clearly jealousy that's pretty unfounded considering he's now a phys…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 10:34 PM
9

They fortunately don't appear to be married.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 10:07 PM
10

Well, for one thing, men have considerably lower standards than women Only for sex. Men are a little pickier for LTRs. A caveat is that women usually have their highest SMV in their 20s, which is probably the average of most of the posters here, leading many here to think that the dating market's much more skewed toward women and against men than it really is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 09:32 PM
1

You are quibbling about the differentiation between straight leaning bisexuals and predominantly homosexuals now. It's a significant distinction. The percentage of the general populace identifying as predominantly gay is ~2%; the percent of people who have had sex with someone of their own gender but identify as predominantly straight is orders of magnitude higher than that. The study asking if someone had same-sex before =/= asking if they identify as gay. ​ The largest study validates what I s…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 03:53 AM
1

?? Click "show parent comments."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 01:06 AM
1

The article title at archive.org didn't come up. I did find another source on the same date discuss what's apparently the same study, though. It was 32%, but it was only the correlation determined from genes to the chances of someone having sex with someone of their own gender, which doesn't differentiate straight-leaning bisexuals and predominantly homosexuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 12:46 AM
1

We're talking about the men she attracts. Someone else already addressed this near the beginning of your comment chain. It's important in these type of debates that if you can't remember what was said that well to reread comments (I'm following my own advice, btw). ​ I say it's illogical to consider those who don't pursue for whatever reason as being among those she attracts People like the woman in question can approach other people too, even if just to make conversation which will open the doo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 11:40 PM
1

You were making it out that the pool of men who don't approach a woman aren't better than those that do; I explained why that's not necessarily the case, that women (or anyone) shouldn't consider their dating pool to only be people who approach and get pushy with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 11:04 PM
1

Paywall. But the title says, "Many Genes Influence Same-Sex Sexuality, Not a Single ‘Gay Gene’."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 12:15 PM
1

Per the most holistic study done and reported in the NYT, it is not all genetic. Only around 30% can be ascribed to genetics Citation please.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 01:24 AM
1

About to sleep, skimmed parts of each of your cited links. The first three implicate that no singular gene has been identified as causing homosexuality, and at least one of the articles overtly says that genes play a role. The last article I've barely read and no quick conclusion can be reach without more thorough reading; it stuck out that most of the dated citations within it were pretty old, but I'm curious enough to read the whole thing later.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 06:29 PM
1

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B4TDxouIgAAyfIw.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 06:21 PM
1

she was hesitant because she feared it would attract the wrong kind of customer: men who merely want to objectify her body (which she found less pleasant) as opposed to men who want the girlfriend experience (which she rather enjoyed). I read of a survey finding that the good majority of women who got breast augmentation liked the result some time after the fact. Her reasoning that you implicate might be in good part true if she were considering comically big? Otherwise, most men like curves, bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 01:50 PM
3

Abusers / dark triad types can seem charming when they're trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 01:28 PM
6

Why would either of these guys be guaranteed to be good for her? Both could be horrible for her. The idea is that men who are attracted to women where they won't attempt to court out of fear of offending them are more personable with better morals, on average, than men who don't. There's high variation, TBF, and many women are fine with only dating alpha bros.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 12:53 PM
2

I have found more studies to say that there wasn't a genetic contributer than this specific one. Citation please. I've researched into the topic a few times and never found such. ​ Years ago I read a study that found that the increase in nueroticism of females leads to the increased chance that children were gay. It could just be corollary. The article I linked cited evidence that homosexuality runs in some families far more often than random chance would predict, including the breadth of a fami…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 12:44 PM
13

There a unspoken high statistic of homosexual men with the common trope of overbearing and abusive mothers and lack of healthy attention from stable fathers. It's unspoken because it's false. I tried several Google searches to find any evidence of this, instead of quickly shouting you down, and what I did find basically made out that genetics are the dominant factor in determining true homosexuality. One of the studies cited found that when one identical twin in a pair was gay, the other was jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 11:45 AM
2

Look at the shades of grey instead. Don't look at Shades of Grey.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 08:11 AM
39

to become predators and gay. 🎵 One of these things is not like the others, one of these things just doesn't belong 🎵
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 07:52 AM
0

Thanks, but you barely replied to the points in my last comment. I'm curious about a couple things you said and a few things I said, but I understand if you're just not up to write the few paragraphs it'd take to adequately reply to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 01:33 AM
1

Oh I was assuming you were a dude. That changes the equation a bit, but it's not true that all compliments from men to women "are a bartering chip or an attempt to flirt." I give a lot of compliments to both men and women that are meant to be interpreted at face value. I'm curious why you think it's otherwise? Men flirt more, but I don't follow the bartering chip bit. I feel that women's compliments are on average less genuine in being more based on precise context. In particular, their complime…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 12:51 AM
0

If a man compliments me I take it with a grain of salt. Why? Men are usually more genuine.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 11:02 PM
3

You're just talking about breaking up at that point, which the good majority of people have dealt with (at least in developed nations). That doesn't lend justification for a narcissistic misandrist cult. And I can't remember reading a single complaint there of a well-off man who cordially broke off with a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 10:23 PM
1

I'm not an RPer, but TBF you have the stats of a woman who's normally either egalitarian or FLR.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:31 PM
1

Lol? ELI5?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:54 PM
3

He gave his age as early-mid 30s, not especially close to 40 then. And I've determined from research when I was considering a physician career path that it would be impossible for many to have a decent LTR during med school, and perhaps also for trying to get elite grades in pre-med. And then residency is on the harder side too, pushing to where he's probably only been a full physician without heavy work commitments for a few years, so not being married isn't necessarily that weird by early-mid …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:50 PM
4

He said that all his relationships ended amicably, and (below) that he only had four partners in his life. Presuming he's telling the truth, he's absolutely not going around hurting women. Also to u/neetykeeno, u/lemurianelf, u/dasa_man
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 05:55 PM
1

How would you tell the difference between someone who practices FDS and someone who is just old fashioned? I haven't rigorously read through their material, but of what I've read, I wouldn't expect it that hard to tell b/c the shenanigans they suggest start from very early on in a courtship. And more specifically to what you said, "old fashioned" women only partly overlap with FDS members, tending to have a deferential attitude toward men if anything, and highly value fostering LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 05:37 PM
1

K, I was just going by the face value of what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 03:17 PM
1

Men are mostly just upset women these days aren’t societally obligated to get married and therefore don’t need to settle if they don’t want to We must live in pretty different cultures. With the people I'm familiar with, both personally and otherwise, women are more interested in marriage than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 01:57 PM
1

Because that OLD interest disparity is solely due to men having a way higher interest in CASUAL romance only. Gay men get many more OLD messages than gay women from those of their own gender, for instance. Men's interest in LTRs is actually about slightly less than women's.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 04:55 PM
9

I'm getting the feeling that a lot of people here have little experience with socializing that involves alcohol. Someone can be pretty drunk and appear fairly cognizant, and alcohol is frequently involved in night life socializing. You're generally fine on consent if the person can hold up a conversation. I would tell dudes, though, to pay attention if the woman has a catty vibe to them (and you won't have witnesses), as they would be the threat to where you got sexual where they clearly agreed …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 09:01 PM
1

Lol, and how well did you make her aware of this before getting together?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 07:10 PM
1

Cheating involves deception, hence "cheating." It's what poly relationships are based on.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 03:30 PM
2

I feel that surveys that show men cheating more than women are due to women lying more often, but where are you getting that % from? Depending on what's defined as cheating, I might agree with it from personal experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:45 AM
1

If you're open about it, including not surprising this proclivity to your partner only after you commit to an LTR, then it's not cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:38 AM
1

TBF, based on my experience and some discussions, women aren't any better. It also depends on what's defined as cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:32 AM
1

Only degenerates go to or work for strip clubs What do you base this on? I've never gone into one, but based on comments in this thread, many normal-seeming men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:28 AM
1

u/cherryapp chances are if you're here you're young. The single female to male ratio is at its worst for young adult men. Particularly if you're in your 20s, focus on yourself and advancing your career, and have an attitude of low expectations for romance until you're in that more established place.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 11:10 PM
1

I really believe the amount of people especially woman who think they are much higher than they actually are is pretty slim. I think it's higher than that, based on the sizable minority of women who have these sky-high demands for a partner and/or complain about the type of men who are attracted to them in not accepting that it's b/c of their apparently low SMV. I'm under the impression that there are more women than men with pretty low self-esteem to, such that women have more people in both ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 03:58 AM
1

I think the issue is that PPD men would prefer women did have low self esteem and find the self acceptance/self love movement nauseating and annoying. They are super affronted by the idea that women might have high self esteem or want to strive for that. No? Can you cite a couple PPD threads by dudes as evidence? Most dudes prefer women to wear skimpy clothes (if she's fit to his liking), flirt more often, and initiate sex more if they're together; all of which necessitate higher self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 03:55 AM
2

Like, wtf? The bar for men is so low. OTOH, if it weren't for us humanity would still be living in the stone age, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 02:24 AM
27

As a fairly intelligent smart intellectual, I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 11:24 PM
1

The closest parallel is a woman wanting to fool around with another woman, which is fairly common IME.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 11:37 PM
2

I would say it's bad if you have to regularly run into the person, and really bad if you're in a close relationship with them. It's usually okay if you basically just met, especially if alcohol was involved. {Edit} I would suggest to women that if you're a feminist who wants men to broadly treat women better, you should give a polite rebuff in the good majority of instances. Women ghost more, but men do it too, so to a lesser extent the same goes for men the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 11:28 PM
3

I don't know what exactly "not going with the flow" means in this context, but intellectuality isn't correlated with prudishness.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 11:24 PM
1

I'm male and I was predominantly referring to convos with men where women weren't present, yes. I'm under the impression that women-only groups complain about men much more than the other way around, but that's only speculation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 01:39 PM
1

Inceldom is toxic and misogynist as fuck Where are you getting your definition from? "Incel" in its basic form means "involuntary celibate," which one can easily be without having toxic personality traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 01:15 PM
1

most men hate women That's not my experience in conversations with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 01:11 PM
1

Meaning you moved on and focused on one of the tens or hundreds of guys who were interested and picked one near or at the top. TBF here, that many men will be interested in casual romance, which women usually have little interest in, and a chunk of them are dudes who right on every pic and often don't reply to matches. Women are at least somewhat more interested in LTRs than men, so she's talking about those prospects that are shit for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 01:07 PM
1

From what I've inferred, bigotry is in good part due to lack of education and parenting on the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 12:57 PM
2

Being good at sex isn't hard, 90% of men are just trash at it Many women have trouble getting themselves off, a significant minority of men are polled to have ED, and I don't know if women are all that much better at it except that getting off men is easier. {Edit} Part of the problem, also, is that women often don't open their mouths to direct the man how to be better in bed. Also to u/DjangoUBlackBastard and u/DeliciousPussyNectar
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 12:23 PM
1

Men don’t tell women about their girlfriend because they know a lot of women won’t have sex with him if they know he’s taken. I'm not so sure about this, what are you basing this on? There's good evidence suggesting that women are more attracting to men attached to a woman, while the other way around makes no difference. I read literotica a bit, and women having a kink of seducing a man who's taken isn't rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 12:17 PM
2

The rest of what you said will never occur. Slut shamers will always exist, just as creep shamers will. Group hate will also exist as long as there are identifiable groups. Almost every group has gotten a turn on the chopping block. Right now it’s white mens turn. In a few years it will be someone else again. You seem to be generally intelligent based on your other posts, but I strongly feel you're wrong here. You're basically saying that bigotry shouldn't be combatted through better education a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 12:12 PM
2

Chad-chasing entails giving dominant consideration to surface-level traits, while ignoring deeper-level traits and considerations for compatibility. Many, if not most, women who experience and complain about broad toxic masculine behavior from a current or former male partner engaged in chad-chasing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 12:10 PM
2

MGTOW is going to naturally have less attractive men considering its core goals. Biased selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 07:46 PM
2

Your citation says that the statistical difference was "small." Surgery is male-dominated as a profession, so maybe the women that enter take it more seriously, which usually happens with males that enter female-dominated areas too? You're being dramatic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 07:42 PM
2

Could be, though I wonder how scientific inquiry would show when the woman personally knows the man well. I suspect it would still make a difference (implying it was social status-chasing), but the study had participants rate strangers. Thought-provoking reply anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 07:36 PM
2

Interesting, thanks for sharing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 07:30 PM
1

Okay, you're just conflating negative attributes. I have a thread open now of women being asked if they find a difference in misogyny b/w attractive and unattractive men they've known, in looks, and most are saying no difference. Incels are only in the bad-looking camp.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 07:24 PM
1

Men lie and cheat and deceive. They present themselves as one way, but end up another. I don't think this is more true for men than it is for women. Women actually lie and manipulate more, though it can be argued that the things men lie and manipulate over have more consequence on average. Otherwise I generally agree with your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 07:09 PM
2

It's a joke but it's pretty universal that people tend to not want someone no one else wants. It depends. The thing "no one else wants" can be had at a bargain, and I like bargains. There was a study that concluded that whether male participants were told a woman was taken or not didn't affect the average of how much they were into her, but the other way around women tended to be more attracted to the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 07:02 PM
1

What would you call an involuntary celibate who's had sex and isn't radical?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:58 PM
2

Cheating rates b/w genders are similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:54 PM
1

Adding to this, women are generally less into sex than men are, as well as much more relating sex to a broad emotional connection versus something to do for fun. Stacking the two results in a large gap b/w the genders in interest in casual romance. OTOH, women tend to desire LTRs at least slightly more.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:41 PM
1

I think they're more similar when you skip past the casual romance aspect up to LTRs. Men are way more interested in casual romance, but are somewhat less interested in LTRs, and these two things get conflated by most people. The interest gap in LTRs by each gender is at least closer. Both groups foster narcissism. I don't know what TRP was like early on before being quarantined, but right now the community appears to be better than FDS in being way more centered on self-development, versus comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:33 PM
3

If the term's used in the most basic sense, most incels are non-radical.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:06 PM
1

What would you rather have, a shirt or a blowjob? 😂 bruh
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:58 PM
2

What do you mean by "incel movement"? I think it started from a woman. I don't think self-identified incels conversing in a support community will reduce their incidence of mating, and people who use it as a misandrist slur facilitates hostilities and implies that men's value is strongly tied to their capacity to manipulate women to have sex with them, which also doesn't reduce their incidence of mating.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:54 PM
1

I think the thing with Incels is what do you guys really bring to the table beyond just hating women? Atleast Islam is a religion with a beautiful culture. It seems like inceldom from the outside looking in is simply 50 shades of self loathing. I think you're confusing incel with misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:49 PM
3

I don't identify as incel, but to my understanding they're simply implicating that they want romantic relationships but can't get them; that's not necessitating "an intensive therapy session" IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:42 PM
5

The Muslim religion is inclined to violence yes. I agree with this, but not all of them, which is what OP posited.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:39 PM
1

Damn, sick burn. What a chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:30 PM
4

Now kith.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:19 PM
1

I read the end as, "good potato," which is also true.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:15 PM
1

When's the next one?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:29 AM
3

You reaaalllly should've waited until purge week was over to write this. Good topic, just terrible timing IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:37 PM
2

I know it's a joke, but the color must match the joke. I probably lean more red than blue, but my flair's color matches the (mostly) joke text. Change the color, or I'll have you kidnapped by FDS for their male sacrifice rituals.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:04 PM
1

You're ignoring factors that most would predict would raise women's happiness and lower men's, and it's not just the Yale study drawing the same conclusion. Studies on time-in-place happiness internationally find that women tend to be slightly happier than men worldwide, on average. One other notable thing in the happiness studies focusing on industrialized countries is that men's happiness tends to be found to be dropping a little bit too, even if less than women's. Considering the objective im…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 01:04 PM
1

The dominant issue is that the woman complained about attention that was strongly related to how she was dressed and the poses she made. I read into the story earlier, and the dude might've been kind of following her around stationing close to her; if that's true, that's a legitimate gripe, though him ogling her isn't (he didn't do intimidation-leering like holding eye contact). Answering your question for me, I like women dressing in skimpy clothing at the gym and a variety of contexts, if they…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:13 PM
2

the same guys who would tell young girls to cover up because it’s inappropriate. Like bro, they’re children, the only person looking at them sexually is you No, male pedophiles are attracted to the same sort of things regular men are, outside of age group, like conventionally erotic clothing, so it's not a "the only person is you" situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:07 PM
4

Lol, goober. Btw, if you're going to keep that that flair line, could you change the color to blue? Purple's supposed to be b/w red and blue pill ideology. I'm obsessive compulsive, and it's bugging me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 11:42 AM
2

Probably true, though more fun can be had if people recognize irony and don't take things too seriously. It should be looked at like an entertainment retreat.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 11:34 AM
2

😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 11:31 AM
1

This is doing it for me; keep going.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 11:30 AM
7

Come on man, you might hurt her feelings. How dare you hurt a queen.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 11:30 AM
0

u/Square_Inflation_534 : did she do anything particularly bad to you or anyone else? Since this involves someone at work, I'd say don't do it if your answer is "no" to that question because of potential professional problems it could create for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 11:07 AM
1

Arrrrrrrr!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 09:02 AM
1

Being jealous over fictional characters seems to be almost infantile. What OP is talking about is the equivalent of women getting jealous or otherwise having a problem with men watching porn. I'm okay with either, but jealousy's common enough in adults that I wouldn't use the word, "infantile."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 09:00 AM
1

Your trolldom is the trolldom that will pierce the heavens hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:55 AM
3

True King right here 😤✊ 👊💪
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:49 AM
1

Also, angles are sharp-edged. u/MyLife142 If you're implicating that LOB is soft, you should've called her a circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:45 AM
2

Im just saying every post is about how dumb women are, etc etc etc. it seems like no one realizes this sub does the same shit FDS does. Like exactly the same. As someone else generally pointed out, this week is an exception to what PPD is generally like, as it's ordinarily strictly-moderated. Normally, part of what you see is due to there being more men than women on the sub, but FDS is still considerably worse b/c they're generally more caustic and overtly censor posters who argue for fairness …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:36 AM
1

That's true. There are something like twice as many men as women. Anecdotally, I've inferred that people tend to be argumentative, have high attention to detail, more logically-inclined than the norm (not terribly so but more than average), neurotic, above average intelligence, and come from bad backgrounds (upbringing, relationship history).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:25 AM
1

*autistic boys I'm moderately autistic and I'm betting I could schmooze and seduce you in person, so you STFU with your slurs.... Stacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:22 AM
1

Maybe he didn't throw away earlier trash. He's waiting for his submissive girlfriend to clean it up ;-)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:52 AM
1

I would suggest having some such men in your life if you like the aesthetic, but predominantly at an arm's length, only making an exception if you meshed well with one's personality for a long period of time (probably years). If you're already in an LTR, this goes for other women reading this. Dudes already more readily do this, both gay and straight, since we're more casually attracted to (usually way) more people, we get more used to understanding that someone we're highly attracted to is ofte…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:51 AM
2

I think an important takeaway is that it's good to regularly exercise, but don't go for all bulky muscles unless you're doing it for yourself. When I exercise, it's maybe like 15% for the ladies, 85% for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:46 AM
3

Small minority of women are into especially skinny dudes, but a more sizeable one are into slightly skinny, basically what's common in most of Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:51 PM
–

Well, he's not telling, he's showing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:03 PM
–

dates back centuries - measuring cocks, pissing contests, entire religions about cocks (Shinto), cockfights... And modern architecture. Google-image "penis building." Like damn.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:50 PM
–

You just need a true sigma man to prepare it for you with his masculine touch, little lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:46 PM
4

Lol, she was telling the treasure hunters her story as a Titanic passenger after they found the drawing of her. Manic pixie dream chad apparently brought her out of strong depression too. I'd give it a pass. Though admittedly I'm pretty gay for the movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:22 PM
1

She was cured by my magic penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:08 PM
3

The sadness this brings me has curbed my shit-posting.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:08 PM
12

That said, I've know more than a few women who are into skinny guys. There's variance. Also more than a few who specifically avoid muscly dudes b/c of what they presume their personality to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:04 PM
3

I wanted to find out a little bit about my favorite lover's son.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:02 PM
2

Lol, how is your account 11 years old but you haven't made a single original thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:57 PM
2

I <3 purge week.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:55 PM
3

Bruh, were you high when you wrote this?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:54 PM
1

I like how your post leaves it ambiguous whether you killed him or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:50 PM
1

The two occasions I asked on Reddit what term I'm supposed to use for human females when I mean to insinuate both minor and adult age, I was downvoted with no answers. What's your answer to what word I should use?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:48 PM
6

I feel it also strongly depends on if she's been angling herself to be the housewife-type, as she'll need to make money if/while single and she's not pressing hard for a "real" career in the mean time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:46 PM
3

+ u/ExpertAccident https://image-cdn.essentiallysports.com/wp-content/uploads/Mike-Tyson-12-6-e1630999171815.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:43 PM
3

Also women cheat about as much or near as much as men, both in studies and in my experience, especially if the definition of cheating expands to more casual physical affection, like kissing and groping.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:39 PM
1

Your stepdad sounds like a bit of a piece of work, but we all in varying degrees have found out that most of the people we held in high regard weren't as great as we thought they were. For men's age preferences, it's more like that it doesn't significantly change over time, the way it usually does with women. But I've had much older women interested in me too. Like way older. Didn't think it was weird. Okay, it was sometimes weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:36 PM
–

Getting hot in here 🥵
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:24 PM
–

Why don't you submit good shit posts, and be the change you want to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:08 PM
–

Jesus the front page. Some of you people are toxic and vile. I should prob leave this sub for my own mental health lmao TBF, it's "purge week."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:04 PM
-1

Learning even a quarter of the self-control that most people expect from women will solve the problem. Men are studied to be significantly more interested in sex than women, on average. And it's generally more socially acceptable for women to display most emotions than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 03:06 PM
4

Weird how so many guys on here blame women for e.g. being fat but you never see the reverse: “women are fat because men aren’t good enough to be thin for.” Just b/c this forum's mostly male. If you do a global Reddit search for female-centric subs, the top ones tend to endlessly complain about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 06:06 PM
3

The complaining from women about harassment from men, at least as it pertains to flirting, is often the whining variety that shouldn't be taken that seriously. For instance, if it was really a problem, they'd push a culture change where they are the decision-makers for initiating flirting and asking out, but they overwhelmingly don't want that. Bumble has more male users. This is in contrast to moods like anxiety and depression in men, which women are typically more repulsed by, but are much har…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 07:25 AM
1

Most of the people here have a combination of eating up what amounts to a religion about gender dynamics, having been significantly hurt by the opposite gender in the past, and/or being too young and inexperienced to know any better. I don't spend that much time here, but I can tell you that it seems to be moderated very well for a subreddit (fairly, and clamping down on casual rudeness that most subs allow). Also, average intelligence here is high for a subreddit, even if leaning neurotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 01:40 AM
2

✊✊
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 03:50 PM
2

Okay, I now presume you're very young, barely an adult. In fair part it's a natural feeling at college age, but I'll suggest (1) at least start building good LTR skills now; and (2) your college probably sports a good male-female ratio, but that's going to go bye bye hard when it ends and women your age are predominantly at their SMV peak, so don't take it for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 07:20 AM
1

What kind of logic am =I= using?? Let's cover your assertions: "A little stupidity goes a long way. Being on a lower cognitive level has tremendous benefits because you simply aren’t aware." -- Not only do you not provide any supporting evidence that this has any truth at face-value, but what does this have anything to do with a person loving the chase of early romantic relationship stages but quickly getting bored? "You enjoy things on a base level, and maybe you’re happier that way." -- You co…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 07:17 AM
1

I think your issue is that you’re too smart for your own good. A little stupidity goes a long way. No. If he were so smart, he'd have already found out how to deal with his addiction to the hunt and drama in a more emotionally healthy way. ​ u/Mark_Freed : as one who used to experience the feeling you speak of much more so when I was younger, I would suggest redirecting the hunting aspect to fostering strong relationships with people when you're proven to match well with them, and not just in ro…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 12:01 AM
1

Uh huh. You don't want sex until marriage, and frequent like 3 Christian subreddits. You know the saying: if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's a fundamentalist Christian.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 12:49 AM
1

put yourself in the situation. Bruh, this is the opposite of what you're doing with these men. I've never ponied up more than a few dollars for a streamer, for the record, but I'm not going to be that judgmental dudes who are often dealing with a dearth of human affection. I'm suspecting you're still in the young whipper snapper stage where you think you know way more about how the world works than you really do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 09:39 PM
2

Skimming through your profile, there's a goodie goodie Catholic church girl thing going on. Kween, maybe. Less grating than maybe 80% of the posters here, though. Related: I'm an atheist who's a former fundie Christian, but still into the church girl aesthetic. It's sometimes such a tease, knowing that the pursuit would be a dead end. I've tended to hit it off well with women who themselves are former fundie Christians, now areligious, but kept the church girl aesthetic. Pretty rare, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 09:33 PM
4

the types of guys who give money to those women are the exact type of men that women should actually be afraid of because they are not right in the head. The research coming out suggests it tends to be lonely men (sometimes women) wanting a connection with someone they like. So no need for internalized misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 09:04 PM
1

It's a joke, sweetie.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 09:02 PM
1

Well a friendship always involves =some= level of emotional attachment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 08:30 PM
1

as long as she didn’t fall in love with him? I was speaking to the assumptions that people make, as this is difficult to know. But I can answer yes to the extent much more than women do, as men are much more prone to allow male friends and such flirt with their lady, IME.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 08:17 PM
1

Because the female and "ugly" male friends don't have a shot at her heart. I haven't yet mentioned that there is a lot more overlap between male friendship and physical attraction (with their gender of preference), leading to many men having jealousy issues with their lady having friends of the gender of preference, while it's much less typical for women to be jealous of their man having friends (some being extreme with this jealousy). Obviously true emotional cheating can happen this way, but i…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 07:55 PM
1

No it's not b/c, as I explained, physical attraction isn't nearly as correlated with deep romantic attraction for men the way it is with women. Come on sis, read my posts more carefully ;-p
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 07:27 PM
1

Knowing that my theoretical boyfriend in this situation only finds her hot but doesn’t respect her, is still not reassuring. Why? There will always be women he's more physically attracted to than you. If a man says otherwise, he's lying. But physical attraction isn't significant to deep romantic connection as I explained. ​ I don’t really understand the male friend analogy? Swap the discomfort you're talking about in this thread with your man have those feelings with you have male friends / a cl…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 07:07 PM
1

Women wanting to incorporate sex toys with a person isn't unusual. If you're secure about it, go with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 06:45 PM
1

Surprisingly many women either show indifference to a man showing off his physique, or even repulsion... even if the man's good-looking. Otherwise you'd see more such pics.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 06:44 PM
1

You don't get direct pleasure when you're doing oral or massaging her either, but you probably do those.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 06:38 PM
2

I did read that a dating profile being specific attracted more people.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 06:34 PM
1

Interesting. Do you remember more from the study?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 06:19 PM
1

Reading through your posts here, I'm under the impression that you're assuming that men's physical attraction is highly correlated with deeper romantic attraction the same way it is with the vast majority of women. We can be highly physically attracted to someone we have no respect for, and very quickly. The best comparison I can think off the top of my head that you should relate to as a woman is a romantic interest being highly upset / not wanting to date you b/c you had male friends, or a clo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 06:15 PM
1

Wait, so are you actually male, as that seems like the quick-story of a dude. If not, why do you suppose you have this interest in casual romance that few women have? Like I'm a dude and I would have a hard time doing anything with a hooker beyond cuddling, and that's after I got to know her a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 10:19 AM
1

You all do. Sorry, bbz.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 10:13 AM
3

The good majority of women would have a problem with a man trying to do that at any point with their CC or car.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 10:02 PM
1

Damn, you read between the lines with me so well.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:54 PM
1

I'm not interested in mental gymnastics. What I said stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:52 PM
4

For some relationships that go long enough, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:34 PM
1

🖤🖤🖤
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:32 PM
2

All hatred is criticism. All of it is between broadly hating men and singling out some (often petty or innocuous) thing a man did that they didn't like, to which all the replies are toxic vitriol. Don't defend them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:15 PM
1

How'd you get interested in the sex doll industry as a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:11 PM
2

Wow, is there a subreddit about being bizarrely wholesome?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:09 PM
3

I don't know the veracity of the meme, but the problem is that the woman's lying or employing cognitive dissonance. You can say you love someone a lot, that they're great, etc. without making things up. Also to u/redkoicarp and u/BabyOutrageous468
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:03 PM
3

What about it is toxic? Lol? Most of the posts are man-hating, most of the rest of the posts encourage women to broadly behave overly aggressive, they ban women who humanize men at all, and between the rules and posts are all-around narcissistic. It's easily one of the biggest cesspools on Reddit to the point that it's bizarre that the sub hasn't been deleted or quarantined.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:00 PM
1

I'm a fair bit familiar with 2XC and FDS, never spent time at AW, which is why I asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 08:51 PM
3

TBF, this is what many women want men to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 08:47 PM
2

Losing weight and looking halfway respectable is not difficult Losing a lot of weight and keeping it off is pretty difficult, TBF. Studies support this.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 08:45 PM
2

Sir, this is a Wendy's...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 08:42 PM
3

Elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 08:36 PM
2

Do we know that this isn't a joke?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/08/21 05:16 PM
–

TBF, she said she didn't care for the guy for years. And I see ugly dudes with women all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 02:52 AM
–

I haven't spent a lot of time on this sub, but enough to notice that most posters have the toxic disposition of red pill if male, FDS if female. There are some smart posters and posts, but it's why I don't spend a lot of time here.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 02:51 AM
–

I do believe there are some men on this sub who are just young and inexperienced, and just don't know enough to understand that female sexuality and male sexuality are fundamentally different and always will be. I agree with this, but will say that women are broadly worse in their understand of male vs. female sexuality, just that men are louder with their opinions. For instance, if you have solid knowledge of male sexuality and see any female-centric group talking about how to be a good partner…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 02:19 AM
1

That's a fairly good-looking dude :-p
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 12:41 PM
2

😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 12:33 PM
1

This. I'll add that what I suspect is that the two genders could have a similar emotional response to a visual stimuli on a broad emotional scale, but that doesn't mean that the emotion they're experiencing is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 10:09 PM
1

#WholesomeBros
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 10:04 PM
3

I consider to be procuring hundreds to thousands of dollars from someone, where it's not a traveling situation, for a little physical intimacy with someone who's more lonely than anything to be exploitation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 07:19 PM
1

I hope I don't have too much faith in humanity in assuming that OOP is probably joking...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/06/21 09:44 AM
1

I might have useful advice as one older and with more dating experience than most of the guys here, but you already have many replies and I'm drowsy for a write-up, so I'll say to reply to me if you would still like a reply ;-p
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 09:03 PM
2

Ooh that sucks, had my share of bad partners, and my family has many ASPD people. But yeah, wouldn't blame feminism on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 08:22 PM
1

Frequent bashing =/= healthy skepticism. The primary consequences are (1) garnering higher expectations, which are studied to be negatively correlated with happiness; and (2) behaving in a more toxic way toward that gender, which generally results in getting treated worse by them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 01:39 PM
2

Is there nothing out there for women to encourage them to avoid toxic relationships without encouraging misandry?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 02:50 AM
0

Also, both communities claim they're focused on self improvement but in reality they spend 80% of their time hating on the other gender. Maybe this used to be true for TRP, but isn't anymore. FDS, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 02:45 AM
1

The implicated study conclusions are enough to suggest that your original notion that what amounted to a patriarchal LTR dynamic made women unhappy is incorrect. Now beg for forgiveness from your male superior.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 02:02 AM
1

Not that women were happier and that marriage was more common. Your suggesting that women's role in more traditional marriages hurt them is speculation. But if I were to speculate, I don't think it's women being more submissive necessarily that made them happier, but both partners having lower expectations / sense of entitlement (higher expectations have been studied to negatively correlate to happiness). I've read of BDSM couples where the man is pretty submissive to the woman; the important pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 12:10 AM
1

Marriage would've had an even bigger impact on women's happiness in the past. Even today the good majority of women lean submissive, IME. OTOH, I see all kinds of resistance from women to step into leadership roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 11:56 PM
2

She literally flat out said because it’s what young people do. I was floored. Just the utter disregard for my feelings or even me being a person. But her answer really conveyed a lot to me that that is how women have been conditioned by the feminist movements. I'm somewhat anti-feminist, but this woman sounds more like a narcissist than anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 11:38 PM
1

Women used to be at least slightly happier before feminism took a stronger hold, so this isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 11:34 PM
1

Awwww, PPD should come together to give OP a group hug! we wont frivorce u bbz
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 02:54 AM
1

BUT then she said no, all or nothing As in she wanted him to break up with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 02:44 AM
1

Marriage studies find that people who lived together first actually divorced more. I think what happened with OP is that they couldn't spend a significant amount of IRL time first. I'm not against living together before marriage first, necessarily, and the type of people who cohabitate before marriage probably has a lot to do with the statistic, but it's enough to suggest that there's nothing magical in predicting marriage satisfaction in living together beforehand.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 02:30 AM
1

Damn @ your whole story. How were your parents so broke, and what was their rationale for you being responsible for your siblings' well-being?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 02:26 AM
4

.............
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 02:16 AM
1

Lol. The upside to an LTR is much higher than doing that, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 01:26 AM
1

Oh, then you just mostly misunderstood my post. I meant that LTRs can be great, not that they always are, or even usually are. LTRs are the financial equivalent of high-risk, high-reward investing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 01:18 AM
1

I don't really understand your post, sorry. I disagreed with your first paragraph, and I'm not seeing how your follow-up contradicts what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 12:51 AM
1

Don't worry about it. Too much of your collective response feels like you're playing games / arguing in bad faith. I probably won't engage you again anywhere else. Take care.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 12:38 AM
1

If I can go in with a sense that its methodology is credible, I would be curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 09:16 PM
1

Oh, looking back, you must've meant 4-5 for the entire immediate family. Moving on, the percentage of people who can adequately financially support more than a few people is fairly small. For parents to be prodding financial support from their married offspring, they'd have to have been irresponsible with their retirement-planning (when something like a significant medical expense didn't happen). I'd personally be embarrassed if I felt the urge to do it... except if maybe the couple was rich. Em…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 08:57 PM
1

this was your assumption. i didn’t tell you how often i pleasured myself because honestly, i don’t think it’s relevant. Or that you don't do it much, discrediting the notion that you are someone with no interest in casual sex but possesses a high libido. ​ sexual arousal isn’t a fleeting thought, it is an urge and a feeling. you don’t have to act on the urge for the urge to exist. It generally does, because a high libido person is going to frequently engage in sexual activity either with others …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 08:45 PM
1

There'd have to be a big enough stink raised for politicians to change it. In the mean time, men wanting to help men should push forcing a prenup... no matter how cute and sweet she seems. And "prenup" isn't synonymous with, "poorer spouse gets nothing"; you work out something you both deem fair. It prevents both sides from the possibility that the other turns into a morally reprehensible leach, and it also makes a potential divorce much cleaner. I perhaps should note that marriage does have up …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 08:29 PM
1

I can feel the thoughts from the FDS succubuses reading this... "ahh, fresh meat!" I'm guessing you came from a happy family, and about all the other marriages you've seen are happy. Are you okay with the idea that one of the most morally reprehensible, sadistic people you'll ever meet gets to siphon large amounts of money from you? It's not just that you're giving up money, it's who's doing it..... and this is before how massively ugly it can get if you had kids together. What's probably anothe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 08:15 PM
1

The depth of a long-standing, strong romantic relationship is one of the most significant boosts to happiness out there. It's worth pursuing for many, though obviously it can be hard to get.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 08:01 PM
1

yes i was just as horny when i was single, on an almost daily basis. i can’t give you more detail than that without being disingenuous The significance is there's a big difference between a fleeting thought and a concentrated effort and time allotment to private sexual gratification. From the sounds of it, single-you pleasured yourself a few times a month, probably not more than a couple hours; I wouldn't consider that beyond a moderate libido. Though if I thought there'd be so much back-and-for…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 07:41 PM
1

you’re assuming i didnt experience being horny to the same frequency when i was single. You've been dancing about my questioning about it for several posts. After reading your entire last post, you've still not given a straight answer about it. ​ still have the self control not to have casual sex. I'm not up to rereading out entire exchange, but if I recall, you simply aren't interested in casual sex? That's not self-control. Not doing something that you don't feel like doing isn't self-control.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 06:00 PM
1

Your other post seemed to presume that I was contesting the validity of average income, not the oddity of financially taking care of a large slew of people. One parent financially caring for a bunch of kids AND two sets of parents while having a moderate income is pretty rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 05:55 PM
1

Oh, if you haven't been single in a long time, your perception's probably being colored by having a partner you're readily attracted to, and I already covered why I don't include a person where all their lust is for a current long-term partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 03:39 PM
1

Most men (or anyone) aren't going to have 4+ kids or care for several other family members. I tried looking for it through a note file I have before my last post, yesterday, but couldn't find it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 03:36 PM
1

That's not what I was suggesting. You're saying you get "aroused 5-7 days a week"? How does this materialize? I asked about hours/month you pleasure yourself instead of orgasms b/c one can rush it to orgasm. You should be able to have a fair idea what you do, come on ;-p
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 06:33 AM
1

a man who has to shoulder the entire financial responsibility of a family of four-five on a typical middle income salary (think £20,000 - £50,000) , along with possibly helping out his parents, and maybe even his wife's parents It's dumb for someone to choose those responsibilities in advance if that's all the income they're pulling in. ​ Overall, I think a couple having more flexible roles would prevent a lot of these issues/resentments that those who go down the "traditional" route Yeah, I rec…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 06:16 AM
1

so if a person is aroused 5-7 days a week, they’re still low libido if they’re only willing to have sex with a committed partner? Without a partner too? Otherwise, yes. If I love a single TV show, to making it a point to watch it the few times a week or month it's on, one wouldn't say I love watching TV. In any case, how often do you pleasure yourself when single, say, in hours per month? (#SuspiciousQuestionLol)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 05:25 AM
1

I personally prefer men shorter than me but this is the part of me that isn't traditional Why do you suppose this is? What else can you say about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 05:21 AM
2

What's your plan if your husband leaves you for his 22 year old secretary? 😂 bruh
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 05:17 AM
1

It's your libido being highly tied to a specific situation, or the high entry barrier.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 05:03 AM
2

Maximum female benefit? Not possible, relatiobships are inherently reciprocal. You might call this the narcissist fallacy: thinking that the way to maximize happiness is to be wholly selfish at all times. ​ I saw one post calling a potential baby a scrote? Like, no. WTF? ​ Not having babies with a jerk/loser is probably a good idea. I would tell people not to have children until well into a proven-healthy relationship, like, years after the L-word starts getting used, and when a solid financial …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 05:01 AM
1

Was pretty tempted to create a 'PrinceCharming' s/n and replying to this with *knock knock knock*
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 04:38 AM
1

u/rft24
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 03:14 AM
2

u/vtec__
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/06/21 01:49 AM
1

There are a fair bit more men than women here, women engage in this somewhat hostile banter too, and the primary purpose of the forum is to argue. Here's what I'm talking about: the most prominent female-centric forums I'm aware of revolve around man-bashing in varying degrees. 2XC has overwhelmingly turned into complaining about a man or men generally, and has >13 million users. FDS overtly promotes hating and using men. Just did a search for other pro-female forums; r/feminism is mostly man-ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 01:10 AM
1

I put it out there that she should be lying b/c you came at me as if you were so sure of her testimony, and that women on average lie a lot more than men. I'm older than most people here and have learned that it can be surprisingly difficult to really know what's going on inside someone's head, even people one's close to. That said, I almost included in my last reply to the OP that the best litmus test for someone's libido is probably someone's masturbatory habits, especially when not otherwise …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 12:18 AM
1

I lean liberal, but I read one of your sources and find the idea of eliminating prisons for women but not men disgusting. Most of the arguments in the article could also be applied to men's prisons. There's already proven significant favoritism for women in the justice system. I think there should be significant judicial system reform, but you apply it to both genders.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 11:55 PM
2

Yes I am. The same page I linked you shows the 2019 5-borough household income as $69k; that's not significantly above the national average. Of what I recall of the few conversations I had with people making claims like yours, when discussion turned to their finances, it always implicated that they were spending some big money on things that most people don't have/use, and calling them "necessities."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 11:40 PM
1

First, calm down. I was speaking to my personal experience. But also, your friend could be lying to you... I suspect she probably is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 11:31 PM
3

I'm trying hard here not to be disrespectful. The average home value in NYC as of 2019 was $681k. The same page's COL index for NYC is 162 (62% above the US average). Living closer to or especially in Manhattan, in a nice area, are LUXURIES. Like, if I were making $500k/year there, I'd probably buy one of the closer, better area properties at a few million dollars, but I wouldn't have the balls to call myself middle class or poor at that point... and that's even much less than the type of a mort…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 10:21 PM
1

would you say a woman who wants to have sex with her boyfriend daily has a low libido just because she would only have sex with him once he committed to her? I've never heard of or personally dealt with a woman who liked to have sex daily with an established long-term partner (that she wasn't pressured into), didn't have religious hang-ups about sex, yet broadly had no interest in casual romance with anyone, ever. Maybe the woman or women you have in mind are doing it primarily at the behest of …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 10:07 PM
2

Fixed it. Brain glitch, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 09:31 PM
7

Okay, calling the most expensive of the most expensive of the most expensive area(s) to live in and then implying that $1M/year income is needed to make rent/mortgage doesn't make it middle class. Living a few Manhattan blocks in a different direction will probably be considerably cheaper. Failing that, living almost anywhere within NYC outside of Manhattan Island will be considerably cheaper.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 09:25 PM
3

Oh okay, it seems like they probably have some sort of agreement. I have something similar with my girlfriend, hasn't been terribly tested yet but I've come to be strongly against tightly-monogamous relationships. In my experience, most people do things that I know their partner wouldn't approve of, and I don't want to fool myself and eventually succumb to the dishonesty. And if that girl knew about it and approached the wife like that, good, fuck that bitch... then dump her afterward ;-)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 07:36 PM
1

I find it helpful to log out and make some written/typed commitment to stay away for days to weeks. When I come back I tend to be considerably less irritable and pickier about what exchanges I engage in.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:32 PM
1

maybe it’s an excuse for women to bash men. And so what? Men do the same thing to women online all the time. Not nearly to the same extent, including that many men will call out talk or posts from other men who seem hung up on bashing women. ​ FDS is meant to be a safe space for women to discuss a multitude of issues. No; if you include any sort of nuance, like being against double-standards in treating the opposite gender, you'll be banned. Replace "safe space" with "cult." ​ My personal bigges…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:31 PM
2

I would say a mix of both with a lean toward ironic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:21 PM
3

The earlier US is probably better described as more vaguely Christian, hence different Christian sects. The Founding Fathers definitely weren't particularly Christian-minded if they penned an anti-religious component into The Constitution. Also, this was at a time when the world at large was considerably more religious than now.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 07:20 PM
2

As in the married couple discussed letting the other (or just the man?) stray? What do you know about their relationship in that regard? Did the side ho know he was married, as far as you know? Who initiated the encounter b/w her and the wife?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 07:17 PM
3

I just took a glance myself; pretty funny shit. Could alternatively be titled, r/FemaleEmpowermentShitPosting
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:03 PM
1

with a community that is overrun by toxic people misinterpreting the sidebar This is at least partly false for the manosphere subs and wholly false for FDS due to the moderators who take part or encourage toxicity. I would say it's more the other way around: generally toxic communities with some good parts, especially FDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:00 PM
3

when we go to criticize groups as a whole, we look at the absolute worst people who clearly don't represent the majority and pretend that's all they are. Most of the posts in FDS are either overt man-hating and general narcissism. ​ It is good for women to say what they want and need out of a relationship, it is good for women to leave abusive situations, it is good for women to find emotionally intelligent equals who will enrich their lives and partners whose lives they can also enrich. It is g…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:48 PM
1

you don’t have to be low libido or uninterested or even religious to choose not to have sex with someone during the early dating phase. In my experience, a woman with a high libido, or usually even an average libido, isn't going to just have no interest in casual sex, even with the typical woman's emotional attachment issues with sex. If she's the type where emotional intimacy is highly correlated with her sexual arousal, then she's toward the low libido end generally (only getting turned on by …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:35 PM
12

Yeah, I used to live in NYC, and LOLed at her implicating that $1M is middle class there. Like, NYC is definitely expensive for the amenities all over, but that's not even a little true.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 05:49 PM
11

For guys that have already reached the finish line she is nothing more than a pump and dump. I would correct this to say that the entrance price is much higher than if she was with him before he was rich.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 05:45 PM
6

Miami's weather is crap half the year though, lol. I would pick somewhere more scenic and better weather (I partly already have).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 05:44 PM
13

our once great Christian, moral nation I'm just going to politely point out that the US was never a "Christian" nation, per se, as it was specifically penned into The Constitution that no religion may be formally adopted by the government. Morals I think are being traded. People probably used to do good things more out of the goodness of their heart before. In contrast, discrimination against people who are simply different from the norm (this goes beyond race and sexual orientation) is signific…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 05:41 PM
11

Those types of arrangements never work out I wouldn't say it never works out, but I would say the woman better be bringing a whole lot to the table at that point... and signing a prenup.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 05:36 PM
12

Could you explain your first paragraph a little more? {Edit} Could you also mind elaborating on the below earlier post? Sounds like a juicy story. Do you know why the wife was okay with his side-pieces, and how that encounter with Ms. Side Ho started and finished? I saw this happen at work, some woman was banging the rich hot guy and came to the party and faced off with the wife... the wife wasn't ugly, but the attractive side piece was a smoke show. Wife literally said "Are you Suzy, Clara or L…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 05:32 PM
0

OP didn't say that (cis het) women should have sex early, just not to play games about it if she does. I would tell women to operate under the assumption that an LTR isn't going to materialize regardless of whether they agree to sex, and if she's okay with that then go ahead. This is different from a woman with a low libido, or just isn't that much into the guy yet, or religious obligations.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 04:32 PM
1

She said, again: I deserve to be desired by my partner in all ways Do we have to Google formal definitions of those words I emphasized from her post? You're doing the heart-first analysis where you either like the OP or resonated with the jist of her post, so you're plugging in assumptions of a problematic statement with, "what they really meant was..." This is a form of over-analyzing, and accusing me of the exact thing you're doing. I'm interpreting what she said at the face value of her words…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 11:52 PM
1

You said, word for word, "I deserve to be desired by my partner in all ways." Your reply above is implicating something fairly different. You might want to edit your post to reword that bit. From your OP that I didn't originally reply to: I believe love makes you find your partner beautiful because you get to see them for who they truly are. I've come under the impression, over a long period of time, that this can significantly vary by the person, a simplistic way would be heart-first vs. head-f…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 08:51 PM
-4

I deserve to be desired by my partner in all ways. You're likely setting yourself up, and your future partners, for disappointment with this sort of expectation and entitlement. Have you ever been able to get to know anyone without finding things you don't like about them? I'm in love with my girlfriend, yet there are some things I don't like about her, and I imagine she feels the same about me. IMO, a lot of successful romance is being with someone whose faults you don't find that bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 06:39 AM
1

u/velvetunderground111 >Asking if this community over-analyzes 😅 😅 Hi! Welcome to PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 12:35 PM
4

Actually it may not be necessary. I've already cited the Wiki article that elaborately discusses physical attraction. I will add: https://georgiastatesignal.com/the-sexual-spectrum-of-not-wanting-sex-explained/ https://www.usd.edu/diversity-and-inclusiveness/office-for-diversity/safe-zone-training/sexual-orientation-versus-romantic-orientation You're entitled to your own opinions; you're not entitled to your own facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 09:20 PM
4

So you anticipate that the PPD women are going to broadly disagree with you, huh? If you don't put your money where your mouth is, it's a roundabout concession that you're wrong, no matter how chesty / hamfisting the last word you get.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 09:13 PM
1

Your OP said, " I actually don't think I've ever in my life seen someone say you have to be attracted to fat women"; my line of responses amounts to, "I've seen and heard women basically do that lots of times." Your assertion that I am not contesting is, "But men are allowed to have preferences, women generally respect those boundaries," which was not in your OP, implied or otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 09:12 PM
3

OK, but so what? The part that I said immediately, which you cut out. Are you trolling me?? Reread what I said; I answered why I brought the hypothetical up. ​ This has nothing to do with what I said about no correlation between employment and intelligence or family-mindedness. Total nonsequitur. You made a strawman. The part of your OP that I was contending didn't specifically mention employment, but then you posed my contention as if you did. ​ A WOMAN dating a MAN of financial means after hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 09:07 PM
1

Yeah, I'm not contesting that, lol. I contested just what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 08:49 PM
5

What I would rather my daughter do has nothing to do with whether the attraction is real or contrived. I brought up that hypothetical because if you exclude a person's financial prospects from a romantic partner's consideration, what does that leave? Generally, looks and personality. I presume you're a man and that you're not going to tell me that a romantic partner's looks aren't important to you -- and a person's looks are generally more superficial than their financial prospects (at least if …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 08:31 PM
-2

I was contesting your implication that women don't complain about men being unattracted to overweight women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 08:20 PM
6

That's not the hypothetical I asked, and this has nothing to do with OP's assertion that I was contending.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 08:07 PM
1

Women with high n-counts (which makes up a big chunk of single mothers) will cheat, as will men with high n-counts. You're moving the goal posts from single mothers to just anyone with many sexual partners -- something that people can usually easily lie about, and even aside from that, many former sexual partners doesn't blow up the chances of cheating. If you dispute this, cite an article. ​ Not the same thing, neither are the biological parents of that kid. What? We were talking about happines…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 08:06 PM
-2

It depended on the instance, but it was not a rare occurrence and tended to be in the tone of whining.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 08:02 PM
15

I'm a man and I disagree. If you had a daughter, you rather she chase a men with money, or men who look good? I'd much rather the former (though I'd prefer she look at their personality most). At your face-value comment, how is wanting to date a person whose job implicates a degree of intelligence, the capacity to care for them, and the capacity to care for a family if they want one "false, fake, [and] artificial"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 06:49 PM
4

I've heard from women both in person and online complain about men being attracted to looks and being unattracted/judging overweight women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 06:46 PM
1

Oh, your risk of being cuckolded in that scenario is very high. I've not experienced anything anecdotally or read any studies to suggest that single mothers are more likely to cheat. ​ Yeah, if the kid is his. Also no studies I've seen suggested this. Not even where it could be implied, such as couples that adopt.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 06:40 PM
1

That's if I was cuckolded, which I'm not talking about. And happiness surveys don't find couples with kids to be less happy than those without, generally.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 04:24 PM
1

Thank you. I read the abstract for one of them: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/191634 It seems pretty mixed results in efficacy. Didn't see anything about penis size there, or in the title of the first page of your search query citation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 07:02 PM
1

I mean can you link me to an article going into decent detail about this? I've never heard of a hormone that boys can take that makes them taller with a bigger penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 03:39 PM
1

I know which male products I like. And it's a total of $200. What collection of things can men wear do you like that cost <$200? Assuming we're talking never-used items.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 01:53 PM
1

In isolation, yes. But certain Britishisms might cause you problems. Brits are on average more conventionally feminine, which is bad if you're not in a liberal area in the US. IMO Brits and some other European cultures say sexual things in conversation more casually, where as it could get you in trouble here as it's almost always considered to be hitting on someone, if they're the opposite gender. It's definitely a novelty to me when I run into a British person, in the US, because they're relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 01:01 PM
1

Hormone therapy to make him over 6ft with a big penis. Curious about your citation for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 12:53 PM
1

What country do you live in? {Edit} If a large country, what city?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 12:44 PM
1

destiny brought us 2gether, bbz ​ I was looking through older threads. While there are many posts in the community, the new thread rate isn't that high.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 11:35 AM
1

Lol, you're unironically citing a Simpsons skit as evidence. Careerists who run into major problems, it's either b/c they come to hate their job, or they're trying to do a lot of work managing a family AND work a strenuous career; this is bad for anyone to do. I'm talking about being a careerist with minimal family obligation; plenty of people do this and stay happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 09:02 AM
1

I don't follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 08:29 AM
1

Funny guy, you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 08:28 AM
1

most centrist voter type people think the far-left is 100 percent insane and obnoxious but will never say it either. Since you want to get that political, the far-right's worse. E.g. There are no left-wing versions of Donald Trump and Alex Jones (all three of morally bankrupt + attention-whoring + intellectual ogres).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 07:53 PM
1

He's researching very thoroughly!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 07:29 PM
1

Trying to obtain a good romantic relationship typically requires high risk. If a couple doesn't have kids, a person can often have both. Having kids isn't important to happiness, which is supported by studies into the matter. A good career can enable a person to affect many people's lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 07:26 PM
1

What pros of staying with a woman outweigh the cons for you? I'm in a good relationship. Women are cuter, I'd rather cuddle and have sex with women over men, there's a unique flavor to the friendship and affection components. Women typically have way more people wanting to be friends with them, and if you're coupled you get to benefit from much of it. I've had lots of bad relationships, just saying what the potential upside, that I'm now experiencing, is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 06:58 PM
1

How's it a shame if a woman's career-centric and is good at it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 06:39 PM
1

I've had a regular dating history as a man, and I disagree with this. Kids can be fun, and you have the opportunity to shape young people much more than older, if you're into changing the world or depth of meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 06:38 PM
1

Maybe it used to be. TRP is much less toxic. I was never a regular there, maybe the latter cleaned up their act after being quarantined, but it's not nearly as bad now. I knew they were sort of the mirror to TRP, but I was saying that I'd look on them much more favorably if they were more like MGTOW instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 06:11 PM
1

I would find FDS to be much less of a cesspool if it was about the female version of MGTOW, instead of trying to trick men into allowing themselves to be siphoned of their emotional and financial resources. In any case, romance isn't for everyone and it's good for people not engaging in it to direct their energy to productive endeavors.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 05:14 PM
1

/u/7SovarN : see above. I'll add: what would stop anyone wanting to do violent crime if police were dismantled?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 04:08 PM
1

I've inferred that there's more than a small percentage of leftists who want to substantially reduce, and some completely do away with, the police. I would say you're half-right about it being a poorly-representative moniker. The other half is that, while I agree that most police departments need at least moderate reform, part of a good solution involved MORE spending on them, at least on a per-cop basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 04:07 PM
1

Nah, being in a fundamentally strong relationship has a handful of perks beyond sex, even for dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 08:07 PM
6

Men are easier to please sexually, but harder in other areas of romance.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:50 PM
1

You're getting roasted here, but one thing you could do is not date him but stay friends with him and keep him in your life, if he's okay with that. Things can change over years, and maybe through his social circle you meet someone of his professional background whom you do click with.
/r/RedPillWomen01/04/21 11:04 PM
1

If you live in a swing state, it's pragmatic to vote for one of the two major parties for reasons that are well-explained here. If not in a swing state, or an individual election you've determined from polls to not be competitive, voting third party is okay or even rational, as it signals to the main party proxy what its voters want; e.g. Bernie Sanders is one of the most powerful people within the Democratic party, despite not winning a presidential primary, for this reason.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 01:41 PM
3

I'm pretty centrist on social issues, including having problems with feminism, but liberal economic positions are generally considerably morally superior to conservative ones and benefit more people. There are reasons that the more intelligent or educated someone is the more likely they are to be liberal, despite the SJW bullshit. People got to look at political issues individually instead of treating politics like sports or relationship partners.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 01:14 PM
1

I almost always get good reactions when I compliment a stranger on a fashion attribute, female or otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/21 09:21 AM
1

You have one of the most curious post histories I've ever seen :-p Curious about your background, if you don't mind talking about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 01:48 PM
1

Complimenting women/people on something specific that they have control over tends to go over well.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 10:43 AM
1

What about why more don't publicly complain even when they feel there's not enough evidence for a criminal case?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 10:40 AM
1

I'm not familiar with the case you mention, but the other month I read comments to a YouTube vid about false sex assault allegations, a number of men talking about experiencing one and facing massive troubles over it. False SA allegations are probably a significant minority of the total. Ironically, it might be women who suffer from them more.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 10:39 AM
1

Partners shouldn't be forced to have sex, though I'll add that they're both responsible to figure out how to make things better, or an alternative, when there is bedroom problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 10:29 AM
1

With where feminism has evolved to, why do you think this is? Serious question.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 10:07 AM
1

TBF, a rape victim making a big public deal about it can ruin the accusee's life. I would advise true rape victims to do just that, when there isn't a strong criminal case.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 10:07 AM
1

I've thought for a while that tort and criminal law should be married. Purple pill law :-p
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 09:49 AM
1

A false police report doesn't carry nearly the penalty as rape. I don't know if the sentence should match the accusing assault, but making a false rape accusation, if proven, should be in the area of a felony.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 09:44 AM
1

In my personal experience alone, women cheat wayyyy more than 13%, doesn't past the basic "smell test." Unless it's using a very myopic definition of cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 07:33 PM
3

TBF, in reading the whole thing, I didn't interpret that she's complaining, but took on too much and wants to let many of the contacts/men down easy. Most women/people would just ghost.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/02/21 09:54 AM
1

There's strong anecdotal evidence that women cheat much more than that. Men are probably lying a bit too, might end up roughly matching them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 09:18 AM
1

What sells you so hard about your man?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 09:10 AM
0

Young adult women are in their attractiveness prime; this is an employment advantage in many fields. Men tend to be better off by middle-late age.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 09:01 AM
2

If it helps, there's a study out there that found that people doing small favors for others were happier from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 08:57 AM
1

I'm curious about this citation, if you can find it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 08:23 AM
0

/u/opheliamy : many of the men here are red pill, misogynist (and women FDS, misandrist), so I would recommend applying a skeptical eye to much of what you read here. About what men tend to like women to behave as, I'm too tired to give a long answer, so I'll say that traditionally feminine is the best catch-all. {Edit} Btw, I appreciate someone here trying to take an optimistic and open-minded approach with the opposite gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 07:28 AM
2

Edit: I'm joking, don't do that, you get auto-banned from FDS if you post on r/asktrp Lol, I like how they're not even subtle about being a cult.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 06:09 AM
1

I have been vulnerable with my gfs in the past, I have cried in front of them, I have told them about my mental illnesses. And the sex frequency never lessened, the intensity never lessened, the attraction they had toward me never lessened. Good for you. Maybe you happen to be attracted to women who like emotional men, because I can tell you as someone with broad dating experience to the point that several people have called me a 'ladies man' that it's not the norm. ​ Ya know what the difference…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 05:12 AM
1

Depending on the person, you hit diminishing returns on happiness somewhere close to $100k, which is very doable in America. It's actually much less than that, when isolating job enjoyment and status out from money, such as with lottery winners. That said, I still want to be rich because while the difference in happiness b/w average and rich is marginal, the latter has a lot more power. Rich people are much more able to change the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 04:14 AM
1

You should make your gravestone read, "I was right."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 04:11 AM
1

Liberal women tend to have higher entitlement, like what?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:57 PM
1

I'm under the impression after reading this that you're pairing up with the wrong men. Maybe ask your friends (not women who are embittered toward men, or men who you suspect have ulterior motives) what they think about your past boyfriends / next dating prospect.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:51 PM
1

I once taught a female friend just a small handful of dating tricks and within 6 months she had a solid LTR going with a fantastic guy I'm male, but curious what you told her.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:43 PM
2

Over 85% of stalkers, violent offenders, and narcs are male. A wrinkle in that is that studies have now found that the judicial system incriminates significantly fewer women for the same crime committed by men, and women who receive prison sentences average significantly lower sentences. Aside from that, men still commit a lot more crime, but it's a small percentage, a lot like saying $4 is a lot more than $1. At least in the First World. E.g. chances are not a single person among the likely tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:41 PM
3

r/femaledatingstrategy Every time someone cites the subreddit's full name, a succubus gets its wings!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:17 PM
1

Me: "if I click her post history, I'm going to see a bunch of posts at FDS, aren't I?" Just regularly voice the things out loud that you say there, in the presence of men. You'll repel almost all of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 10:01 PM
1

Though it's probably happened, I can't remember a woman who seemed to put other women as a whole down to elevate herself. What I do occasionally encounter is a woman putting a specific woman down, or getting catty with her, where she apparently sees her as competition to me; I don't like this. I prefer women to generally be personable. The exception could be if they have a strong intellectual bend, but that's pretty rare for women; emotional but personable are far more common.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 09:52 PM
0

Maybe you guys should actually try to find out what FDS considers high value The sub makes it clear that it's only concerned what women want and think. Which is a shame, since every man I've seen or heard comment on the community finds it toxic, and I would recommend any man who finds the sub in a woman's browser history (more than superficially) to dump her. But you should ignore this sort of input, since I'm a man :-)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 08:51 PM
1

women are attracted to few men,while men are attracted to many women but able to attract few(talking for the average and sub-average men of course). If men improve themselves (Look,Money,Status,Personality) their dating problems will reduce a lot because more women will be attracted to them. If women improve themselves ( or adopt some kind of strategy ) their dating problems won't be solved because it won't increase the pool of men they're attracted to! No. Men are somewhat more interested in se…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 08:40 PM
1

Around the same time, still unemployed, was when I got with the hottest woman I've ever been with. My mother
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 02:08 PM
1

Women are on average considerably less interested in sex than men. Multiple studies prove this. In contrast, lesbian women tend to want to jump into LTRs quickly. This is based on just a few anecdotes I've read, but it matches my experience that the gap between a woman being attracted to a man and wanting an LTR with him is much thinner than the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 02:03 PM
5

Your post history is hilariously douchey. You're what I'd imagine as a main antagonist in a frat movie. {Edit} This was a shit post; stop giving critical replies :-p
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 12:45 PM
1

I will reiterate my point about how anyone who thinks wives and girlfriends shouldn’t be a main source of support for their Male partner doesn’t have have much respect for women and probably won’t have a healthy and balanced relationship. Some men will think this just based on what TRPers and such have said, but those like me base it on personal experience from poor treatment (from various life variables, and then some women making it worse by being frosty when I spoke about it). So a lot of dud…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 08:30 PM
2

I’m not being rude but is seriously how you go about living your life?Never allowing yourself to express negative emotion around a significant other? [...] I’m being honest but it honestly doesn’t sound like you think highly of women if you can’t see your wife being a main source of support for you I don't entirely agree with the guy, but TBF, most women punish men for showing vulnerability emotions, in my experience. And this is with me having good enough game that several people have called me…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:50 PM
2

I've dated a fair bit; in my experience, most women act considerably colder at me showing emotional vulnerability, and I've seen and heard women say they don't like men showing such. To be clear, I'm referring to soft emotions like depression, anxiety, sadness, insecurity... My current girlfriend's great, one of her major selling points to me being that she doesn't discourage me from showing vulnerability.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:36 PM
-1

Oh. Not to the same extent that women flaunt LTRs, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 11:39 AM
1

???
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 07:39 AM
2

First, there's the more apparent component that men are able to do more jobs than women are willing or able to do, the physically demanding and/or risky variety. On the intellectual component, women tend to be better at what I'll call horizontal intelligence, the type that makes what's already known and the status quo run more smoothly; this includes better memory and multi-tasking. Men tend to be better at vertical intelligence -- analysis, depth, big ideas. Hard evidence of the latter is that …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 05:54 AM
3

I'll add that I agree with that for romantic relationships, in part due to the nuance I gave. I'll add more: excluding direct relationships, women need men more as it pertains to broadly functioning society and societal advancement. E.g. if not for men, we'd still live in the stone age. If all need is aggregated together, and we ignore offspring conception, it's probably about the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 04:38 AM
0

I could go on Tinder right now and write "DTF?" to every guy I match with and I will go as far as to suggest that a solid 95% of them will ask for my address and be on their way in less than 5 minutes. This includes the selection bias to only men who swiped right on you. Otherwise, men are considerably more open to casual romance than women, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 04:26 AM
1

chadlites gigachads 😂 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 04:12 AM
1

I appreciate the noting and explanation for the "undefined" men, which I would also apply to women, in the sense that a huge part of what attracts a person to someone is due to individual variation, which a lot of people I feel miss.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 04:08 AM
1

/u/87AudreyHorne : I'm a man. The idea that men can't or don't respect their lady is horseshit. If it was men you saw saying this, they're almost certainly high on the ASPD / dark traid spectrum, and want to justify to themselves that it's not that they're inherently morally bad, but that all men are or must be like that. I have a girlfriend whom I deeply love and respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:30 AM
-2

men desire women much more than the other way around,even though there is a mountain of evidence proving that this is true. No. There was a recent study where established couples were asked a few questions about their investment in the relationship, and women averaged slightly higher on all counts. /u/Ladyofblades Men tend to need women more and take it as a personal failure when they’re unable to be in a relationship or have sex. Women do get lonely but it usually doesn’t devolve into them deco…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:19 AM
0

It seems that men are also more bothered by a lack of attention, dating opportunities or sex. I know far more contented single women of all ages than I know happy single men. In my experience, this is because women get a lot more sexual opportunities and general social support outside of romantic relationships. This gets mitigated a bit by men having much less need for the social support aspect.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:09 AM
1

Men need women’s company & support to a much higher degree. Men don’t have the same Social connections women do & often become rather dependent on their female partners for emotional support. It works out like that women might receive 4x the social support, but men have half the need for it -- there's a gap in emotional benefit, but not a huge one when desire is accounted for. On the other side, women tend to get much better financial support, including if they get pregnant. I've also read that …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:01 AM
1

Mmmmmmmm I would have an LTR with the ugly woman with great, synergistic personality to me if I could occasionally stray. The bimbo, would be open to casual romance, and maybe superficial socializing for the eye candy benefit, but little more (if she's not a celebrity or something like that).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 09:52 AM
1

Could you elaborate on your last paragraph? I mostly agree with it, but I'm curious about more details.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 09:50 AM
1

I've noticed people in wealthy areas to be more physically fit generally, and especially women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 09:29 AM
1

I looked up reviews for the book. At least some of the book is overtly bad advice to women, if the following reviewer snippets are true: "It exposed many of the things about [rater's ex-gf] I had grown tired of--the 'missed messages'; the silence; the cool responses to my efforts to be nice"; another wrote, "What person in their right mind would take the abuse of someone not returning their calls? [...] There isn't enough here about tapping a man's ego. If more women did that, instead of hanging…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 10:26 AM
3

Heavens to Betsy!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 10:07 AM
3

They don't actually. Maybe you're pretty young and things are pretty different for your age bracket; for mine (30s) and older, the vast majority of men who are both attracted to a woman and getting signals from her that she's into him are going to both ask her out and at least try to do most of the date planning. And you didn't answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 09:44 AM
2

nobody is punishing you severely for failing to get a girl’s number. Many women pull the a-hole stunt of boasting about it to mutual contacts, as his expense -- the equivalent of a man boasting about a sexual conquest. For the record I'm pretty flirtatiously aggressive and have little qualm about asking a woman out if we don't know the same people, but I'll be much more careful if we do know the same people for the above reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 09:21 AM
2

i mean obviously you dont want a guy who would "Tend to ignore IOIs" because like theres something wrong with him. its literally filtering out guys who want to play it safe and neurotically fear normal social interaction J/c where are you on the downside to this expectation the unwanted come-ons women experience / complain about?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 09:17 AM
5

but why would i as a woman? Did you stop reading the OT after the title? Both genders messages people a bit more attractive than those they received messages from, and women got replied back several times more often.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 08:57 AM
-1

Most men in dating want to take the lead, and women tend to find this sort of behavior in men attractive. OP overtly asking the man out is still pretty unusually for women, thus significant. And, like, if you know a woman's hot for you, do you feel the need to wait for her to plan out dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 08:29 AM
1

Because women who make the first move are analogous to cute, fuzzy critters that sting?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 08:21 AM
1

This thread = LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 08:14 AM
1

What is a "skipmeisha"?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 07:59 AM
3

Trpers dont want LTRS, cohabitation or marriage. I've read several posts of TRPers or people who know them discussing their interest in LTRs. I've noticed with any large movement, feminism included, that there's many varying opinions even within people who identify with it. ​ There's no upside to marrying a woman with kids. Not directly addressing the positives I listed doesn't make them not true. You can say they're not true for you (e.g. maybe you hate dealing with children) but, again, don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 06:08 AM
3

A lot of that can be resolved with only marrying for very good reason (e.g. you've been in a very solid multi-year relationship where the woman's proven to be a solid girlfriend over a long period of time and you're in love with her). Refusing to marry ever will turn away many traditionally feminine women that most TRPers ideally want as an LTR partner, though it's not a bad idea if a man feels like he has very good reason to not take the risk despite how much it narrows his dating pool. One big…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 05:27 AM
5

Good nuanced take.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 04:39 AM
1

I mean the instance of a non-prenup divorce being split in a way that's dramatically more favorable to one side is in practice pretty rare in the First World, since most women get taught to partly to wholly care for themselves. In any instance, the way to avoid that mess is a prenup, and I was focusing my complaint on that because of the way it seems to be treated differently from other legal agreements.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 12:55 AM
1

That's an extreme scenario where one spouse didn't do any work, TBF. What I'm referring to is a prenup that gets invalidated b/c it was signed "under duress" or, if what I heard is true, the judge arbitrarily decides it was to favorable to one side.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 12:27 AM
1

I wouldn't mind that so much if prenups were honored with the same integrity that almost every other legal agreement is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:55 PM
1

I just like virgins as to sacrifice them to satan in exchange for magic powers. Does that count?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 05:12 AM
1

TBF, women expect men to carry less of the financial load as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 05:11 AM
1

Only if she's being misleading about wanting to wait for marriage for sex, early on. /u/iloveyoubutyou
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 05:03 AM
1

Post from FDS claims to know I stopped reading here. I'll continue if someone replies implicating that the cited text isn't the typical narcissistic man-hating from FDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 03:39 AM
1

Healthy relationships involve the partners making each other their better selves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 05:12 AM
1

No. At least one study found that women found men more attractive when they thought they were taken, on average (there was no difference for men).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 05:09 AM
1

Interesting! I most suspect it's because women who cheat are usually unhappy with their relationship, and relatively unattractive women will tend to be treated worse in relationships, where as with men there's no connection since sex is much more about pleasure than anything for us, and better-looking men attract more people even when they're taken.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 04:49 AM
1

I would presume another reason to be careful about accepting free drinks is the power exchange that occurs when one allows someone to buy them something that often comes with a sense of entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 04:28 AM
1

the worse a woman can do to you - refuse to fuck you No. For starters, I've read horror stories about false rape accusations: getting the man socially vilified and/or long-term psychological trauma and/or murdered. TBF that's rare. What's much more common: fallout from LTRs are usually considerably more damaging to men (in contrast to short-term relationship fallout usually being worse for women); this is due to a variety of reasons, that include women being generally more vindictive and petty p…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 04:13 AM
2

I do think how you present matters and impacts how other people, particularly other women, perceive and treat you. I have an idea what this is about, but could you elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 03:13 AM
7

There are men who've gotten screwed in divorce where they had no kids and both people worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 02:50 AM
9

That's like saying that wearing a seatbelt is planning to crash, or buying insurance is planning for that bad thing to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 11:53 PM
5

The red pill and mgtow subs allow for that type of complaining about women. 2XC does look like it has a lot of complaining, but I do see some nuance, men can challenge them, and many of the issues they discuss I would deem the emotion behind it legitimate. In contrast, it's not nearly the cesspool of misandry and narcissism of FDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 10:08 AM
8

High amounts of agnostics and atheists explains why some of y'all are so fucking annoying Uhh, most people in the First World identify as agnostic or atheist. This trends higher the more educated someone is (more intelligent).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 04:21 AM
0

What's wrong with the sub in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 04:05 AM
1

😅 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 04:04 AM
3

It's considered one in at least the US. It might be better thought of as a shorthand for east Asians.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 04:03 AM
1

He’s been contacting me with multiple different numbers, sending me dick pics, adding me on social media, etc. Every time I block him he reappears with something new. Might want to look into reporting him to law enforcement.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 11:05 PM
1

That male-female ratio highly depends on the dating site. E.g. eHarmony has more women. I've read a bit into this; generally, sites that have a high entry barrier and/or are more LTR-focused will tend to have more women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 07:12 PM
1

😂 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 07:05 PM
1

There are studies suggesting that women are more attracted to taken men, all other things equal. I'm not all with OP, just clarifying there's scientific merit to the general idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 07:04 PM
1

She declined, claiming she wasn’t ready for a relationship. A few days later, I’m with my best friend in the library. He asks me if I’m talking to anyone. I show him the girls profile on IG. He frowns and opens him dms. I shit you not, this exact girl was trying to get him to break up with his girlfriend and go out with her. She also dmed him first. After he sent her his girlfriends picture, she pursued him even harder Optimistic take: at least you can appreciate not getting into a relationship …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 06:43 PM
1

Interesting that this is your experience, as in mine, older women easier to talk up and be sexual (usually stingier on long-term romance if there's a great age difference, but I'm usually not interested myself in those instances anyway).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 10:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter