TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

eek04 Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by eek04 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

the notion that improved education delays female sexual activity. It's not clear that this study generalize. I believe the Netherlands have a fairly strong education culture generally; it is possible that the culture is strong enough that this variable don't play a significant role there but play a significant role elsewhere. I'm more familiar with data from Norway (my country of origin), and nobody there talks about education delaying sexual activity; however, education delays having children. …
/r/BlackPillScience13/11/22 09:26 AM
2

How do they get 0.5%? The quoted number I usually see is 2-10%, which is also a misrepresentation. The real situation is that only a minority of rape accusations have evidence to decide if the accusation is true or false, that 2-10% have evidence of being false (this is a consensus), and roughly the same fraction have evidence of being true (this is what you find by reading attrition studies.)
/r/MensRights03/08/22 11:26 PM
5

READ. Do you know the term "congruence" or is the problem a lack of vocabulary? It means "when in correspondence". There's a non-linear effect here, with the positive and significant effect being when the factors are pointing in the same direction. This means there isn't a linear effect. That's fine. That's a reasonable conclusion. The conclusions that there is no effect is you pushing your ideology. The data isn't there.
/r/BlackPillScience12/10/21 08:26 AM
6

Again: You didn't read my previous answer before dismissing it. That's where I show that the data shows difference. Until you start reading things before dismissing them, there is no reason to pay attention to any of the things you write. You're just regurgitating your opinions without even looking at the counterarguments.
/r/BlackPillScience12/10/21 08:24 AM
4

Yes, did you notice that I pointed this out as my first bullet point?
/r/BlackPillScience12/10/21 08:16 AM
4

Women’s STM-desire did not vary as a function of status or attractiveness of the potential partner. Their data doesn't support this conclusion. It says that "hot == congruent between status and attractiveness" and gives a fairly strong correlation. But even if their study did say that, that doesn't support your next statement: Seems like the group of women who engage in STM/'cock carousel'/whatever are just...sorta...that way. Has nothing to do with hawt d00ds. We cannot fully generalize from a …
/r/BlackPillScience12/10/21 08:14 AM
11

What do you mean "the hotness has no correlation"? Look at the data table: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-007-9179-y/tables/1 The data for women for "would bed" is Low Attractiveness High Attractiveness Low Status 2.36 (date: 3.14) 1.85 (date: 3.54) High Status 2.08 (date: 3.15) 3.23 (date: 4.69) I read this as follows: Higher chance of bedding if congruent (status and looks fit together) Attractive + high status is significantly better than not attractive + low status Signific…
/r/BlackPillScience12/10/21 07:55 AM
9

According to the closest to reproducible research I know (which is really, really tainted by being a single male subject study by a pickup artist and not written up) typical wait times are about 6h. This is the number reported by Mystery, who spent years doing extremely manipulative, repetitive and whatever-status-works behavior to get women to bed. The present study doesn't do a credible manipulation of status to get full effect. Real differences in status comes out in body language, social int…
/r/BlackPillScience12/10/21 07:45 AM
1

Your experience is set up based on (A) how you filter your input, and (B) what is OK to signal to you based on your displayed values. Real display in this area generally results in punishment, so expect that all info you get as "experience" is colored by that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 12:06 PM
2

This seems to be projecting women's typical values onto men. Very crudely, men typically mostly care about sex and exclusivity of sex; women typically mostly care about love and exclusivity of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 11:45 AM
8

I at one point worked in phone sales. A thing that was very clear was that women typically sold better to men and men typically sold better to women.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 09:46 AM
11

It's not well thought out - it is misleading, and not covering that the sentencing guidelines are different, and there's prestige connected to the term "rape" which isn't present for other terms. Think of it as "civil union" vs "marriage".
/r/MensRights01/04/20 08:47 AM
1

Seems unlikely that women have a low standard for what counts as large, rather it must come form their partner choices based on penis size. Impossible to say without more data. You might for instance have that women want to be able to say that they have a partner with a large penis, and therefore overestimate.
/r/BlackPillScience18/08/19 12:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter