TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

eet_mijnen_schijt Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by eet_mijnen_schijt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The only acceptable explanation, because it is the only truthful one, is "I was weak". That assumes that everything tries not to cheat and then "succumbs to desire" or whatever. A lot of individuals just think cheating is and exciting which is why cheating dating sites exist specifically catering to those that want the thrill of infidelity. Personally I can't be arsed to have a moral judgement on infidelity; I really don't care much about it. I have less respect for those that that want sexual e…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/19 10:22 PM
0

And even if they were exactly as high or slightly lower that would still not explain the male–female angle. It seems obvious to me given these numbers that it's just a human beings living together with other human beings thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 05:00 PM
0

No they're also higher in male–male households than in male–female households but indeed female–female households stand out as being a lot higher than the other two configurations.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 02:45 PM
1

You can tell when an individual isn't wearing makeup or at least didn't apply it well. If applied well there is no way to tell the difference between naturally perfect skin and artificially achieved. Just like you can tell when an individual clearly didn't laser their skin to have no hair growth but but good lasering is indistinguishable from just having no hair growth there naturally. Has nothing to do with "guys telling" and "makeup on a girl"; makeup doesn't care about the sex of the skin it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 01:49 PM
3

If it's a male–female thing then why are levels of domestic violence higher in same-sex couples? Human beings just drive each other crazy; especially in "relationships" where the entire point is to make compromises and tell others what they can and cannot do.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 01:48 PM
1

Almost all humans that live together long enough seem to start to annoy each other; this also includes parent–child relationships. I'm pretty sure that is because humans are actually pretty much to the man awful and you can more effectively ignore that if you don't constantly see each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 01:46 PM
1

"hypergamy" is really a super fancy buzzword for "something that 99.999% of all humans do in every single aspect of their lives" but they give it a fancy Latin-sounding name and act like it's a gendered thing to sound scientific. It apparently just means "having a preference for the best"—yeah duh every fucking human would rather have what they subjectively consider the best in every facet of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 06:52 PM
5

Women are hypergamous which is usually interpreted that they want the best available male, but it could also be interpreted that they want a male who is better than themselves. Actually, there's no reason why both couldn't be true: to even register on her Ovary RADAR the male needs to be better than her; then he competes with all the other males who register. I don't get this; everything is "hypergamous" in every way, not just relationships but everything: you want the best possible food, the be…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 04:24 PM
2

"autistic spectrum" is a really broad term and a large part of the diagnosis is very much subjective. What one psychiatrist will diagnose as autistic another psychiatrists will find within normal parameters and even outside of that the symptoms are really different with different individuals. A friend of mine is diagnosed but has no problem reading social cues or facial expressions but is simply extremely neurotic about certain structures and very shy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 04:19 PM
4

This is the general problem with this "SMV" thing—it's useless. It's irrelevant to me what my "SMV" for the average human is; it's only relevant to me what it is for those that I am interested in. For anything else I want it to be as low as possible in fact so they don't bother me. And that's pretty much where I am right now so I'm fine with that. I remember some user on IRC saying a pretty simple thing to another user that asked something like "But by having dreadlocks you completely plummet yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/19 02:27 PM
1

Define "manipulated"? I had sex with one male that was 1.5 years older than I and all the others were younger. What is manipulation and free will here? One might argue that if it's not rape it's "free will" is hitting on something manipulating said object?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 10:52 PM
3

Kant cannot be considered an "authority" on anything; in philosophy there is no "correct"; it's a fancy word for "stating your opinion and having enough followers int hat opinion to be respected". Kant stated a lot of moral opinions with little to back it up but if you already share the opinion then you agree hey. A lot of philosophy absolutely thrives on preaching to the choir.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 03:01 PM
1

Whenever I go out for eating with anything else regardless its sex everything just pays for what it orders; I typically negotiate that total cost of traffic is split. Like if we're going somewhere that is cheaper for me to go but I want to go there anyway so I pay 6 euro to get there and back and another 9 then I'll wire 1.5 euro. If another comes to visit me by train I'll pay half of that and if I go to visit another I demand that half of that be paid to me. The sex of whatever is invovled in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 11:00 PM
17

"Some do; some don't." Your post seems to have a hard time dealing with the very difficult and complex idea that there are in fact some traits that do not apply to an entire gender. Did you also know that some males like coffee and others don't?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/19 11:42 PM
2

You seem to believe these two are somehow antipoles rather than the latter being a subset of the former. [sexual] Egaliterianism is still treating individuals categorically on their sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 04:47 PM
5

I have no idea why individuals think sharing the labour market is in the interest of females; it's mostly in that of males. Being a stay-at-home—especially when you're not even a parent—leaching from another's income doing so house chores is a dirty easy job. There are professional cleaners that do all for like 14 different houses in the same time a stay-at-home does it for one and they don't even get that much money.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 03:45 PM
2

I like this answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 02:04 PM
2

I'll probably don't much think about it but in practice in most circumstances I think it's unlikely that I get along well with car owners.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 02:03 PM
1

Me personally I am not a fan of piercings or tattoos and I have no interest in getting any. I have pierced earlobes for earrings, but that is it. I am not interested in the pain involved in getting them done and I think they are distracting from one's natural beauty. The human body can be totally beautiful without all that gaudy garbage all over it. So you do have piercings and you did went through the pain of getting it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 01:57 PM
2

I think this entire red pill theory is seems to be very much based in and propagated in the US and based on the unique idiosyncractic US model of "dating" and "cold approaching" and "asking each other out". In a lot of places in Europe it is considered very rude to strike a social conversation with a stranger of any nature and there's a far stricter definition of personal space—strangers just don't strike a casual conversation with each other where I live so a lot of those red pill theories whic…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/19 01:22 PM
2

Please state your assumption of the One Thing that women want. Why would you assume that one assumes? I was interested in what this thing might be but had no real assumption either way mostly because it's bollocks: almost any human wants a great many things—some of which subjectively disgusting and some of which not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 05:28 PM
1

So let's assume that's true: that still makes the assignment completely random; evolution isn't a particularly nonrandom process and that still means that for any trait I like there's about a 50% chance it's either "masculine" or "feminine" and that it's just silly to say whether I like "masculine" or "feminine" individuals. I like whatever I like and whether what I like is more common in males or females is really not something worth wondering about when I found it in an individual that I like.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 02:27 AM
0

Classifying traits into "masculine" and "feminine" is completely arbitrary and uninteresting. Whatever trait I like has about 50% chance of randomly being considered "masculine" or "feminine" because it's a completely random assignment.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 02:23 AM
1

If they are oh so rare then every reddit thread about it shouldn't be filled with counter examples. "AWALT" in practice is like "65%".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 02:22 AM
2

Which is why "AWALT" is the biggest nonsense on the planet. You need just one counter example to disprove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 12:30 AM
1

Why would anything regardless its sex want to get married? The only advantage is if your SO really has a lot more assets than you and you plan to screw over your SO from the start; tricking another into marrying you and then divorcing is a great way to practice legal theft and even then it can often be annulled if the other party can make a compelling case that this was surely your intention from the start. Marriage is financially to the detriment of both parties simply because it increases the …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/19 11:59 PM
1

I have not seen such an increase and I only know one individual that uses these apps who describes it as "basically takeaway.com for sex".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/19 11:18 AM
4

Honk honk honk honk.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/19 02:26 AM
1

Not if the committed relationship is with a monogamous person. Monogamous individuals break up too and break your heart to; that doesn't require infidelity. Sex is meant for creating babies and bonding. It's a biological fact that your brain is at least trying to bond with the person you have sex with. That's going to lead to a lot of clingy attachment and heartbreak if you're just sleeping around. No it's not—human beings are built to cheat upon each other anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/19 12:13 AM
1

It turns out you have a higher chance for heartbreak if you enter a "committed relationship" than if you just sleep around... gee.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/19 06:08 PM
0

Have you ever actively tried acquiring orbiters or were you naive enough to think they were just really good friends before finding how covert contracts work? I have had one friend in my life where it went like that where it got some kind of romantic association with another and then just stopped talking to me in at all. I always felt this friend had feelings for me and seemed to be somewhat jealous—not that this friend was female. Apart from that I don't think it happened any further. I've had …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/19 04:40 PM
6

Pre-selection. You desire a man who has experience and who’s desired by other women. “Single women in this study were significantly more interested in the target when he was attached. This may be because an attached man has demonstrated his ability to commit and in some ways his qualities have already been ‘‘pre-screened” by another woman.” Because the study itself refutes "AWALT"? It shows that the number went from 59% to 90% when being informed that the individual was not single? How is going …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/19 01:28 AM
0

My opinion is that "straight" individuals or anything with so-called "sexual orientation" is a fool putting itself into a made up social box and that whatever is friends with them stomachs fools.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 03:33 PM
1

You pretty much exactly described why I in general do not get along that well with older individuals. In particular the lack of openmindedness and how rigid they become in patterns; not just gender roles but everything suddenly needs to be done because "that's just what you do"—that's not a reason I can accept.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 12:11 PM
1

Personally I wouldn't care to be honest. Infidelity has never been something I've been particularly fuzzed up about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 12:07 PM
5

Because body acceptance (or lack thereof) is a topic that women discuss a lot amongst themselves, write about, care about and constantly obsess over. So the movement grew organically around women's perspective and rhetoric and has become a self-perpetuating thing. I roll my eyes at all these "positive messages breaking the beauty norms!" that invariably target a purely female audience that basically pretty much at every single letter Freudianly shows the author thinks being pretty is the most im…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 03:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter