TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

eggsyunwin Archive

View 0 posts and 153 comments by eggsyunwin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Stand up comedy is a horrible source if you're trying to prove that women agree with Red Pill philosophies. I've seen plenty of male stand up comedians mock men or say that women are smarter than men, but does that mean most men subconsciously think that men are inferior? No, it means that some comedians were trying to write something funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 11:32 PM
2

Could you explain how it's good? From my point of view it seems a little awkward.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 02:50 PM
14

I thought the mention of what she did with her hair was kinda silly too. Even if curling your hair did take a tremendous amount more of time, more time doesn't always equal a better look. Who cares how long you think it took her to get ready (and why would you even bother to mention it in a field report). It's not like she showed up in sweats and a stained tank top, chill.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 02:02 AM
1

Exactly!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 11:12 PM
1

Lol that's exactly what I've been saying this entire time. Just because something is enjoyable for someone doesn't mean they're never going to want to receive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:24 PM
2

Plenty of women enjoy going on guys, but no, it's not satisfying like it is to have a guy go down on you/have sex/masturbate/etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 07:43 PM
3

Right. I'm saying you don't find it so. Other people do. Most women don't find it super stimulating because they have a clitoris on the roof of their mouth. Don't do it then. I don't want people to do things they don't want to do, and neither should you. I literally said that's not what I'm talking about. When I say women don't find it inherently pleasurable, I'm not sayin it's a chore for all women or something. I'm saying that sucking a dick in just having someone else's genitals in your moth …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 05:50 PM
4

I mean, if one person never receives oral sex from her partner, it's kinda debatable whether or not both people are being taken care of. Oral sex is very pleasurable for both men and women. Not to mention that getting mind blowing orgasms form a dick isn't most women's reality! If it works for a couple though, it's none of my business. Obviously every individual couple can pick and choose when it comes to what they do in the bedroom - I'm not here to force anything on anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 04:30 PM
5

They're not the same thing, so expecting one because another occurs doesn't make sense for me, particularly when there are complicating factors like smell. No, they're not the same thing, but they're as equivalent as we can get. Not to mention the fact that there are plenty of things that make sucking a dick less desirable! Depending on the size of the dick, it can be more uncomfortable, and there's more bodily fluids involved when you suck a dick. For you. My girlfriend happens to enjoy the act…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 03:14 PM
13

I like girls that like to suck a cock, not ones that do it with expectations for reciprocation. You might be expecting too much of women (and that's your right), it's a little unrealistic to expect someone to actively enjoy going down on you when you never go down on them. You can enjoy whatever you want, but giving a blowjob isn't really inherently pleasurable. Sure some people get off on it, but everyone's gonna want a little stimulation! If you like girls who just suck dicks because it's so p…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 04:34 AM
25

Since I do agree with some of what you said, I can't really offer a direct challenge of your view, except for one point. In a lot of these it's assumed that the woman is going down on her guy. So in responses that tell her to stop with the blowjobs and see how he likes it (which are a few of the answers you pointed out), they're not exactly saying that anyone really owes anyone anything - just that it's polite to reciprocate oral sex (and she should tell him that). Edit: I'd also like to add tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 02:24 AM
3

If the captain makes a bad decision, it's on him; but the ship will be OK and will right itself because it's still intact. All captains make poor decisions, or decisions where the outcome didn't turn out as desired. All captains make mistakes. The problems come when the ship begins to break apart because of resentment. For example: what happens when there's a whole discussion on whether or not moving is a good idea, the wife insists that they shouldn't move and it's a bad idea, and in the end th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:11 PM
2

Can't means "to be unable to do otherwise than." I don't think men who are around children are frequently thought of as pedophiles. I don't think it's a custom, a habitual thing, or a natural tendency. Is it more likely for someone to think of a man as a pedophile than a woman? Yeah. But I have never met a man who interacts with children and because of that is considered a pedophile, and tons of men interact with kids all the time without being accused of pedophilia/thought of as pedophiles.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 07:26 PM
3

That wasn't the only reason it sounded definitive. You also said "I can't be around kids." It's ok to admit your wrong man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 02:55 PM
3

Don't you love when someone says that your making up a complete strawman, and when you prove that they literally said what you said they said, they completely ignore it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 05:02 AM
7

As a man, I can't be alone around children because they will assume I am a pedophile. It literally says "they will," which sounds pretty definitive to me. Nowhere in the sentence does it say anything like "sometimes," it just says that men can't be around kids because someone will think they're a pedophile.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 04:12 AM
4

I already addressed this. Have you been reading my responses all the way through? In your anecdote, whoever told you that you needed to be careful around kids supported the idea that people are naturally more suspicious of men being pedophiles than women. I never disagreed with that. It does not support the idea that all men who work with/interact with children are considered pedophiles by the people around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 04:00 AM
5

Huh? This doesn't seem like a response to anything I said. I never said that it wasn't a problem that people were more suspicious of men than women! I think it's really shitty. I just don't see much truth to the whole "anytime a guy interacts with a kid he's accused of being a pedophile" sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 03:13 AM
5

and while people may be more suspicious of men (which, of course, is wrong) As I said above, it's fucked up that men are considered by most people more likely to be pedophiles than women. That's not a story of someone actually trying to get you fired (or something of that sort), purely because you were around kids. It's a story about someone telling you to be more cautious about how you presented yourself/acted around children/parents. I do think it's sad that that's information that would need …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 02:56 AM
8

I find this such a weird statement, and I see it on Reddit quite often. Men interact with kids all the time without accusations or assumptions, and while people may be more suspicious of men (which, of course, is wrong) it usually doesn't mean that everyone thinks every man near a child is a pedophile.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 02:23 AM
1

Her entire persona is based around that? Really? Being an overweight plus size model doesn't mean your entire self is based around the idea that men finding obese women unattractive is a failure somehow. Now some people would think it was offensive for someone to say that they don't find fat people attractive (not a sentiment I personally agree with at all), but that's not at all the core of the fat acceptance movement. The basis of it is that we should accept fat people (hence the name of the w…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 11:39 PM
1

Could you give me an actual example? Usually it's more people getting mad at people for making fun of someone for being overweight, or something of that sort. I'll admit that I'm not super into the fat acceptance movement, so I know next to nothing about the things that are usually focused on, so an example would be appreciated :)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 10:31 PM
1

Why would it be the next obvious thing? Do you have no understanding of how women were treated at this point in history? It wasn't like they were entirely equal, save for the whole voting thing, and then after that the only thing left to fight for was women's rights. Not to mention that (according to a poster above me) in the 1980s women did fight to make the draft equal. So no, maybe it wasn't the next big thing (women still faced a lot of other shit, they had just gained the right to participa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 12:22 AM
4

It makes more sense to fight for a group you belong in to be able to vote, before you try to abolish something that hurts a different group. I am very much against the draft, but people are gonna try to change the things that make them feel like second class citizens first. What happened in 1914 was fucked up, but it's not representative of the entire movement in modern times. It was a subgroup that did something wrong over a century ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 11:01 PM
5

Fat acceptance isn't about finding mates for chubby people, it's more about telling chubby that they're allowed to exist and that nobody should degrade anybody because of their body. Some people take it further ("fat is beautiful," etc.) but it's still not saying that anybody owes anybody sex or a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 10:22 PM
7

But men often claim that they share 50% of the responsibility of bearing the child but I just don't find that stat true. I still think women have to bear a little more responsibility in carrying and caring for the child then a man does. I agree. I think it's important to note that abortion isn't just opting out of parenthood, it's opting out of carrying something around inside you for a significant period of time/opting out of that physical stress on your body. It's hard to compare abortion in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 08:08 AM
2

Is anyone arguing that single moms were literally forced at gunpoint to become single moms?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 12:07 AM
1

Just out of curiosity, how would you say your views on women/the women in your life change?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 01:46 AM
1

Unfortunately the red pill makes up a lot of their own words. I get wanting people to at least sorta know what they're talking about, but anyone is welcome to share their ideas. This isn't a courtroom. If you're going to use made up words, expect people to sometimes not know what the fuck you're talking about. If you don't want people to ever ask, just don't use any made up words.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 04:06 PM
10

What? So since there are some mean fat people we should go out of our way to let all fat people know that they're ugly?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 06:38 AM
6

Not going to do your research for you. Don't act like people are idiots because they don't know all of the red pill's made up words.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 04:24 AM
3

I don't understand why'd you come to this conclusion. No, it's not easy for men. Maybe it's a girl who's been in relationship after relationship with immature guys who aren't really looking for a serious relationship. Kinda like how redpillers fixate on attractive women that they feel only sleep with douchebags, and come up with the initialism AWALT, and talk about how easy women have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 12:07 AM
2

Honestly I hardly ever get compliments from my friends! A lot of girls who are good friends might compliment someone every so often (but usually it's just offhand quick stuff), but a lot of it is teasing and making fun of each other. Most compliments I get are from women who I'm not that close with. I think the whole catty two-faced friendship is more of a stereotype than a reality for most women. There are assholes of all genders, and there are tons of close women. When I said that women are co…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 11:57 PM
4

I really don't agree with this one. I know plenty of women with small social circles, and I don't feel like most women I know are invited out much more than their male peers. I definitely agree with this one. We still have this idea that men complimenting men is gay, so men almost never compliment each other. However, I will say that I think that we're kinda using the word "compliment" to mean a compliment about something physical. Women are definitely complimented more on things like clothes, o…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 11:20 PM
5

No my point is that it's easy to misinterpret things when you're just observing. You can think that all women are getting invited out all the time because you see women at your church inviting each other places, but those women might feel like they hardly ever get invited anywhere, and those women aren't really friends, they're just polite. That doesn't mean an outside observer knows that, and can think that all women are always getting invited places and have these huge social circles. My point…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 10:42 PM
2

Do you honestly think those were the only five threads in the past two years? The point was that it's super easy to find lots of threads on meeting people/guys on askwomen, I found those really quickly on my phone. They regularly happen, and women aren't always invited out constantly. Rereading what I wrote about fuck buddies, I don't think I conveys what I meant clearly at all! I don't mean that no women want fuck buddies, I just meant that the dating scene is complicated (duh), and it's easy t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 10:08 PM
5

Here are a few askwomen threads that pertain to meeting guys/friends. Every word is a link (I hope). I'm on my phone right now, so I might have fucked the links up. Sorry if I did! Oh, but she overlooks them to go sleep with chad. Sometimes I feel like red pillers are talking about such a specific group of women that it's pointless to even talk to them. When I talk about women, I'm including that vegan hippie girl who does yoga and drinks kombucha, and that book-ish kinda dorky girl who likes li…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 09:45 PM
3

They're just two examples, they're not subreddits dedicated solely to relationships like the red pill so you shouldn't be surprised. Do you honestly think it's that easy for most women to get a guy who attracted to her and truly loves her? Sure it's easy to find a fuckbuddy, but a solid relationship with a guy who cares about her?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 09:22 PM
1

I think most everyone would agree that it's easier for women to get casual sex with strangers than it is for men. I'm not arguing that. I'm saying that women's social lives aren't this easy all the time. There are definitely subreddits like /r/askwomen or /r/twoxchromosomes where women talk about being about to go to college and being worried about making friends, or asking how to make female friends in a new city, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 07:38 PM
1

I'm not sure what your saying, or how it contradicts what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 06:57 PM
2

So when I said the woman in Facebook or the woman walking down the street with her boyfriend, I didn't mean that those were the only two possible examples of you observing a woman and making a conclusion. I'm saying that you're observing people and drawing conclusions that could be entirely incorrect. This includes the woman at church and the woman at the bar (neither of whom are representative of women's lives). The woman at the bar getting hit on also exists outside of the bar where she could …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 06:54 PM
8

"By observation" isn't good enough. It's easy to look at Facebook and misinterpret people's lives (people usually just post the good parts to Facebook). Not to mention that none of these things really have to do with sex. You're basically saying "I don't trust what actual women have to say on their social lives and what it's like to be a woman, because I can look at social media and the woman walking down the street with her boyfriend!! Obviously I've figured everything out that there is to know…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 05:31 PM
7

I really don't think that's true. It would be interesting to actually take a poll of women and see how much of this they say applies to them. Personally, I don't really identify with any of them all that much, except for the compliments one. I think it's just that women are more likely to tell each other they like each ofher's hair than men are, and I still wouldn't say I'm constantly "bombarded" with compliments.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 05:22 PM
5

What I'm saying is no, it's not, and you have a very simplistic view on what women's lives are like if you think they always have big social circles in college, always have lots of prospective romantic options, and are always drowning in compliments.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 05:15 PM
11

Women have it significantly better at this age. They constantly have offers to go to social events, so they never lack a social circle They are bombarded with compliments through social media and in person They always have prospective romantic options, and very high tier options if they want a friends with benefits relationship The way this is phrased really implies "women," not the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 03:41 PM
22

You seem to have a really narrow view of what women's lives are like if you honestly believe that all college aged women are always invited out, always have lots of friends, and always have lots of romantic options.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 07:41 AM
8

Either way, Fifty Shades of Gray is all a fantasy. It's not representative of every woman's ideal relationship. And I know plenty of women who think Fifty Shades is absolute shit. Yeah it might have been more popular than Quills, but it certainly shouldn't be used as evidence that all women's ideal relationship is like this BDSM novel that they got off to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:40 PM
2

Women need birth control chemicals, legalized abortion procedures, and antidepressant medication to give them the illusion of freedom. I really don't understand what this is supposed to mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:33 PM
7

About thirty two percent of women have fantasized about rape. This certainly isn't most women! Of the women who did say that they had rape fantasies, the a quarter of these women reported having them less than once a year. It certainly isn't as common a fantasy as you're implying, if the majority of women who fantasize about rape at all do it less than once a year. Only five percent of women who have rape fantasies have them regularly (more than once a week).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:30 PM
10

Sure, fantasies are representative of reality, but they don't indicate someone's perfect relationship. If a guy jacks off to bukkake porn does that mean his ideal relationship with a woman is standing around with a bunch of guys who are all jerking off on her face? No, it means he thinks it's hot, or he's curious, etc. Plenty of people are into things in bed that they aren't into as far as a whole relationship goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:24 PM
6

The polar opposite of fifty shades. not representative of women. So you honestly think Fifty Shades of Gray is representative of women? There are women who would much prefer the movie Quills, and there are women who's fantasies are more represented by Fifty Shades. Either way, Fifty Shades of Gray is all a fantasy. It's not representative of every woman's ideal relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:21 PM
2

So then, why do we have so many women in here who say 'basically it's all about looks'? I can't speak for all women, I'm sure there are lotsa women out there who feel very differently than me. However, in all honesty, I think I notice women valuing personality over looks a lot! I know plenty of attractive women who've ended up with guys that physically most people would consider less attractive. It's rarer to see these super hot guys with average looking girls, and I think that's because of what…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 04:57 AM
3

I think it more shows how much women value things like personality. I'm not attracted to Quentin Tarantino because his face is so angelic - it's because he seems like a cool guy. With Jensen Ackles, I can strictly enjoy his face now, but the first time my little sister showed me a picture of him, I thought he just looked like a fairly good-looking, basically just model-pretty guy. It wasn't until I saw an interview with him (or like a panel at a convention I guess) and him acting as Dean Winches…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 12:47 AM
3

This is really, really tough for me, because so much of what I find attractive in a guy has nothing to do with their looks. I'd have to say that my ultimate celebrity crush is probably Quentin Tarantino, but it's not like I like him because he's just so gorgeous. I like him because he seems fun, he makes cool movies, and I find him funny. However, especially when he was younger, I think he was very handsome. He's not someone who looks like god hand carved them from marble, but he's still attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 06:16 PM
2

And there's a big difference between my mother being more in charge of finances than my father, making more money than him, and usually having the final decision, and all women trying to control every man's choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 03:47 PM
4

1 - 6 2 - 6 3 - 6 4 - 6 5 - 5 6 - 4 I feel kinda mean, but on a purely physical level, I'm not that attracted to any of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 06:09 AM
2

The point is that it's not expected for men to always bow down and listen to women either... Both genders have free will, and there shouldn't be a "ruling gender," that tries to tell the other gender what to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 11:08 PM
1

The woman who got the fifty percent number said she included pre-orgasmic feelings - basically any "good feelings" were counted as orgasms. A lot more than twenty five percent of women feel some sexual pleasure or pre-orgasmic feelings from "regular sex" (which is I guess what we're calling PIV sex?). So on the absolute high end, about half of women respond to their genitals being touched in that way. Physically that makes sense, it doesn't mean rape was enjoyable, it means that our bodies have …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 03:44 PM
3

No, on the absolute high end, about half of women respond to the physical sensations that correspond with rape. Half.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:47 AM
2

That doesn't increase the meaning of the statistic. It's five to fifty percent, which means it's possible that only five percent of women responded to the rape and had an orgasm. Five percent is not a massive number.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:38 AM
8

There have been very few studies on orgasm during rape, but anecdotal reports and research show numbers from 5% to over 50% having this experience. Not only have their been few studies, the results are contradictory. Five percent to fifty percent is such a huge range, that it almost means nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:25 AM
1

What things can girls do that that guys can't do? I think it's bullshit for there to be anything that only one gender is judged for whether it be exposing nipples or wearing dresses.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 08:22 PM
1

Not every man is that into tits, their are men who prefer butts one hundred times more. And either way, it doesn't fucking matter. I don't have to wear a shirt if a guy doesn't, just because some dude might get hard. If a guy can go to the beach shirtless, why can't I?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 11:42 PM
1

I'm still not sure exactly the contradiction you saw made. I didn't think you were attacking me, I thought that I didn't really like your "I'm-so-smart-get-on-my-level" attitude. We're all gonna get snarky and annoyed when we feel like someone's being completely idiotic, but at least be mature about it (and, for the most part, don't develop a condescending attitude towards someone who's just trying to explain their view). This sub is called Purple Pill Debate, not Purple Pill Act Like Everyone E…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 11:38 PM
2

It's an interesting read! I'd definitely recommend it. Could I ask what you think? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but it seems like you just think people of European descent are naturally smarter than people of African descent? From my point of view, throughout history Europeans (and people of European descent) have regularly had more advantages than people of African descent. People are shaped by their surroundings, hence why Europeans sorta became the ruling race.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 11:34 PM
1

What exactly do you mean when you say "sexual?" When I use the word, I'm using it to describe something pertaining to sexual intercourse. So, testicles would be considered sexual because they relate to sexual intercourse, and are part of the genitalia. Therefore I don't think it's appropriate to walk down the street with your testicles exposed. I'm not using it to describe anything that indicates someone's sex - like a beard. What men get hard at doesn't dictate what women do. There are men with…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 11:31 PM
3

I'm not the person you were originally talking to, and I'm not particularly on their side (or even aware of what opposing claims they've made). I just didn't appreciate your condescending, childish "I'm thirteen but I'm smarter than you!!" attitude, when you were attempting to be clever and snarky. Would you like to show me the claims they made that you thought were such direct contradictions? I'd be happy to comment on those!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:31 PM
3

It's kinda hard to have a rebuttal when you're talking to someone who tells someone that thinking isn't their strong suit, and that it's hard to have a discussion since they're on such a higher intellectual playing field. I'm not gonna validate your childish complaints, grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:25 PM
2

What question have I not answered?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:05 PM
4

If they can do it, why don't they (in appreciable numbers)? Um, does either gender do this? Outside of your hypothetical world, we do need sexual reproduction to continue our society, it's never been realistic to segregate either gender into two completely separate societies. And no society is gonna crumble because of a fucking bulldozer not working. There are plenty of things that the average man can't do by himself, but we've still managed to builds skyscrapers and lift really heavy objects an…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:02 PM
4

See, I really disagree. I think that humans are resilient enough, that either gender could find a way to survive without the other (if we're saying reproduction happens through immaculate conception in this hypothetical world).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:53 PM
4

Have you ever read the book Guns, Germs, and Steel? It explains the theory that the reason Europeans kinda becoming the "ruling race," is because coincidentally, in Europe, Europeans became better acclimated to diseases, and had access to steel (which is obviously very helpful). The guns can be attributed to Europeans a bit more than germs or steel, but it still was their access to metal and gunpowder (which the Chinese invented) that gave them guns. I think the whole theory makes a lot more sen…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:51 PM
10

Jesus, how old are you? In a lot of your comments you try to I infantilize the person with a differing opinion. Don't try to do that, it doesn't make anybody wanna debate anything with you, and it just makes you appear immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:44 PM
4

If every single woman on the planet disappeared tomorrow, save for reproduction, men would have no problem keeping civilization functioning. If all the men disappeared, every civilization would be gone in 30 days. What's the thought process behind this?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:40 PM
5

/r/iamverysmart
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:38 PM
9

Thinking isn't your strong suit, is it? You sound like a thirteen year old trying to be clever, but only managing to be condescending and annoying. This sub is called "Purple Pill Debate," you're gonna come into contact with people with opposing views. Chill.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:24 PM
1

Are you really that dense that you don't get that the reason we consider boobs sexual is because of our sulfide sexualizing them? And nope, you haven't explained why nipples are sexual! Female nipples and male nipples should be considered equal, especially in circumstances like being at the beach. Just because female nipples are capable of lactating (which isn't happening the majority of the time), doesn't make them sexual. It doesn't matter if men get hard at boobs, women shouldn't be expected …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 03:13 PM
1

Well I suppose it's a sexual feature in that sense, but that has literally nothing to do with whether or not it's appropriate for women to go topless in public. It doesn't have to do with actual sexual intercourse. There are plenty of things that are specific to one gender - such as growing a mustache. Men don't have to cover up facial hair just because it's specific to being a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 10:25 PM
1

What? Feeding babies =/= sexual, that's the strangest leap to make. Secondary sexual characteristics are things that appear at puberty, not things that are inherently sexual. Facial hair and Adam's apples are both secondary sexual characteristics, but we don't act like it's inappropriate for men to show their faces in public because it's too sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 10:08 PM
1

Men have breasts too, they just are smaller. And neither are sexual by definition. At all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 03:51 PM
1

Can you prove that they are considered sexual? I'm basing what I said on the fact that these men don't walk around constantly aroused and it's a totally normal part of life. I also have recently read a woman's article after she came back from Africa, and she was talking about being in some tribes where a woman's chest isn't sexualized at all, and that cultural difference. I'll try to find it! However, even if I can't, I think the fact that the women don't flaunt their breasts at all, they're jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 01:46 AM
1

Sexually, men's chests and women's chests are considered equal. Not in terms of lactating ability. But sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 12:09 AM
0

No, in those societies women's chests and men's chests are considered equal... It's not that women are "displaying what they've got," in those societies breasts are basically only used for what they were made for - feeding babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 10:47 PM
3

Sorry to jump in, but I think a guy who's a "player," is considered to be more than just promiscuous. When someone uses the word player, they're referring to someone who's good at seducing women and then leaving them. Someone who doesn't wanna date a complete heartbreaker is being completely rational. But if a woman is acting like a guy must be gross and STD ridden and have erectile dysfunction because he's slept with more than a couple of people, she's being an asshole. I'm not gonna force anyo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 10:07 PM
2

The same reason we teach kids about the effects of drugs and people have locks on their doors.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:03 PM
2

Maybe they're not being experimental when they're young, but I'd say a lot of the middle aged women who read it were still being experimental with their partner, they weren't super experienced with any form of BDSM.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 03:01 PM
6

Yeah most women aren't gonna get off just from someone sticking anything in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 07:54 PM
7

It's the explanation as to why men are more likely to seek out one night stands than women. I'm not saying that men purposely don't even try to make women orgasm or something, it's just a big reason why men are more into quantity and women quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 07:48 PM
7

Yeah, the point is that men are almost guaranteed an orgasm with a one night stand. Maybe they won't orgasm, I can't tell the future, but men seek out one night stands because they think there's a high chance of orgasm. Women don't as much because there isn't as high of a chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 07:20 PM
3

A lot of women actually have vaginas, why would they need to turn to lesbianism?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 07:16 PM
8

Exactly! Probably more women would be like men if there were a lot of guys out there who could make them cum every time. Unfortunately there are too many guys out there who don't really get the female body, so one night stands aren't as rewarding for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 06:04 PM
1

You're in a fucking thread on topless equality and you're gonna lecture me on how nobody should talk about it on Reddit? If you don't want anyone to say anything about topless equality to you, my suggestion would be to a) not go in threads about women's right to have their tits out and b) not post in threads about women's right to have their tits out. The problem is that women are ashamed, even if they don't want to be. There are tons of breastfeeding moms out there who say that they think women…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 03:16 PM
1

I do believe women wish to be sexually attractive to the average man, yes. I think both genders can definitely appreciate feeling attractive, but you might be overestimating just how much time, energy, and thought women put towards men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 02:47 PM
1

But the fault is often laid at men's feet I've heard tons of things blamed, from runway fashion shows go Barbie dolls to beauty magazines. I've never heard men blamed. Most people don't think that a boney runway model is every guys' dream girl. Especially since it's not like those runway shows are especially aimed at men or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 08:12 AM
1

Have you ever been to a beach? Women don't wanna go to work shirtless or something - it just would be nice (and fair!) if women were allowed to be shirtless anywhere men are. Such as the beach, or doing yardwork on a hot summer day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 04:51 AM
1

... What? The point is that if it's socially acceptable for men to walk around with their chests/nipples exposed, it should be acceptable for women to do too. It has nothing to do with what anyone finds attractive or finds unattractive. Edit: I'm bad at typing on mobile :(
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 04:08 AM
1

Most women who go topless aren't gonna be concerned with people seeing their boobs, so that probably wouldn't be that much of a problem. But is it too much too ask to not be ogled completely? We teach little kids to not stare, it is considered rude by most people's standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 04:07 AM
4

I agree. There are cultures, especially in hot areas, where women go topless all the time. For example, cultures in Africa. They somehow manage to repopulate. It doesn't really make any sense that seeing boobs a lot (which basically exist for breastfeeding) would lessen arousal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 11:27 PM
2

The female chest has sexual organs on it. That's why a man touching a women's chest is sexual assault. I don't think it's because breasts are sexual organs. I think it's more about what the person doing thinks. If someone has a foot fetish and starts forcefully fondling someone's feet, and is getting off on it, it's considered sexual assault. For example, this case Not to mention, I'm pretty sure if I began groping men's chests, people would think it was a lot more than me being kinda quirky. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 11:21 PM
3

Exactly! I don't get how topless equality will "solve nothing." It'll solve topless inequality. People don't think it'll lead to men and women being treated in the exact same way or like, end sexism forever or something? They just want male breasts and female breasts to be treated the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 11:13 PM
6

What do you mean that "they really have no idea?" That doesn't seem like an example of a woman overestimating her strength or being completely unaware of her upper body strength. It seems like an example of a woman completely knowing her limitations, and just being impressed with the ease that you picked him up with. And then you posted it to humblebrag about your own strength.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 04:04 AM
1

I mean, it doesn't seem entirely non-sexual, that's a fair point, but it still all loops back around to breastfeeding which is definitely a non-sexual activity. The reason touching the breasts releases oxytocin, and is therefore considered an erogenous zone, is because that release of oxytocin helps women bond with infants. Not so that women will feel turned on while breastfeeding. Just because something is an erogenous zone doesn't mean it's so sexual it needs to be hidden away anyways either w…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 07:30 PM
1

Young's theory is just that, a theory. This is an article written about one scientist's theory, so don't pretend it's this final scientific paper that proves your point. Not to mention, that they even say that his theory is definitely subject to scrutiny. He said that he thinks it all comes back to breastfeeding (what breasts really exist for) which I think we can all agree that breastfeeding isn't sexual. Just because breastfeeding helps mothers bond with infants doesn't make breasts inherently…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 06:35 PM
1

No, not really. They've been sexualized by this culture, but I don't think boobs are inherently sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 05:48 PM
2

I live in a predominantly white area, and have been catcalled by white men since I was twelve years old. It might not be easy to fix necessarily, but it can make you feel really uncomfortable, and it's not just something black and Hispanic men do, or even something just poor men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 04:47 PM
1

So like, what, mammary glands are inherently inappropriate or sexual?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 04:36 PM
2

If boobs are inherently sexual, why are there cultures around the world (like some places in Africa) where the women walk around completely topless and it's totally accepted? I'm not saying seeing boobs can't be a turn on, but don't pretend they're inherently super sexual or were made to be sexual. The way culture has treated breasts has turned them into something that's considered so inherently sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 12:42 AM
3

People don't like that boobs need to be hidden at all times, including at the beach or a sidewalk on a hot day, while there are plenty of situations where it's totally fine for men to expose their chests. There's obviously a double standard, so it seem to me like it could be considered sexist very easily!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 12:39 AM
2

I honestly don't think I ever have.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 12:26 AM
2

I get that point, and I think there are definitely some people who shouldn't be allowed to keep their children, but there's a big difference between saying "look, you can't be a doctor, you haven't gone to school" or "you can't drive, you don't know how," and "please abort your kid because you can't write very well." Also I'm not sure the two are comparable, because having kids is such a natural thing to do, while being a lawyer isn't intuitive at all
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 12:13 AM
2

So to you it actually seems like a good idea for their to be a test, and if you fail the government forces you to abort or put your baby up for adoption? Because that kinda sounds like something out of a dystopian novel.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 09:49 PM
-1

Maybe I'm misinterpreting this, but are you suggesting that in some cases the government should be able to force a woman to abort or carry a child?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 09:47 PM
2

Sorry for jumping in, but I'd think the reason neither of those statements are considered bigoted is because both of those are solid truths that have physical evidence. It wouldn't be considered racist to say that most black people have darker skin than white people because it's an obvious truth, and there's plenty of physical evidence to support it. It would be racist to say that black people are stupid. I think the point was mostly that most bigots think they're telling obvious truths, so some…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 05:04 AM
1

You can say that men and women should be completely equal, and still appreciate someone treating like you're special. She's not demanding that all women be treated like special snowflakes. She's saying that she appreciates someone being polite and courteous towards her, and a man making her feel like she's special.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 06:49 PM
5

But she's not demanding that all men be chivalrous because women are magical and precious, so all men need to give all women special privilege. She's saying that she appreciates a gentleman in her personal life, and that that appreciation can go along with being a feminist. Honestly nothing she's saying is that shocking or weird to me - the idea of being "gentlemanly" isn't radical, everyone likes being treated like they're special/treated with respect. As long as you aren't demanding that one g…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 02:22 AM
5

I think OP's point is that it's very unlikely to sleep with 200 people who are horrible in bed. Of course it's possible, but wouldn't for the most part more experience raise someone's standards, because they'd be more likely to experience good partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 02:13 AM
3

Speaking as someone who's not a huge fan of the childfree subreddit, most of what I don't like is just that the community can be pretty nasty, and they can act pretty shitty and immature. Not to mention that they can act like their way of living is the right way of living so much of the time. Having kids is a personal decision, and it seems like childfree people really just enjoy complaining about other people's way of life/kids. I'm fine with childfree people, I just don't like the community.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 11:00 PM
2

Yeah at this point in time I would never imply that men held all the power or anything! I was just talking about history, and obviously history still matters, but I wouldn't use terminology like "white people have power" or "men have all the money," or any blanket statements like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 08:47 PM
2

See your last example is more what I meant! For example, in the 1700s in the U.S. black people were literally slaves, and it was assumed by really everyone that a white person had more power and more authority than a black person. I really truly don't think of blacks people as being criminals, and plenty of other people don't either. But during a time when every politician, every landowner, every business owner, and the head of every household was a man, it doesn't seem that far off to say "men …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 06:18 PM
2

I agree with you to an extent! But I do think when an entire group is basically excluded from positions of power, it makes sense to say the the ruling group had power - even if not everyone did. God knows there are poor white people and that there have always been more white people, but to say that in the 1700s white people had power seems correct to me. Really my whole point was that that's why people feel uncomfortable when a group that has traditionally and historically been excluded, is bann…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 05:57 PM
0

I think the point is more that people feel uncomfortable with groups that exclude groups that traditionally have been excluded. I mean, really with all your examples! I think most people would look down on a club or group for just hot people (though I feel like one may exist?) where "ugly" people were banned. I think whites only groups offend and make most people at least a little uncomfortable because people of color have traditionally been excluded. Really that's all I was trying to say!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 05:52 PM
1

Why is that posted to askmen? A lot of people probably have misconstrued ideas about women and submissiveness because a lot of women are taught that they're supposed to be more submissive, and men more dominant. When everyone is raised with these ideas, it can really lead to misconceptions about who actually prefers to be submissive. And I mean, when the question is posed to men, I bet a lot of the answers will mostly be influenced by media.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 01:00 PM
4

But you understand that they weren't excluded because of their gender, and that is basically the big difference, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 12:21 PM
1

An estimate is a rough calculation. Even if it's not an exact number, I'm curious how you came up with your calculation/estimate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 12:18 PM
1

So since one obviously very radical feminist said it means it's "feminist canon?" I could dig up the stupidest shit that's ever been posted to TRP, but I'm not gonna go around pretending every single person who buys into TRP's philosophies thinks it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 11:56 AM
1

I think it's less than nine out of ten to be frank. Can I ask how you came up with this estimate?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 11:53 AM
1

I'm not gonna say I'm not on the minority, I just think that women who aren't submissive are much more common than TRPers on this thread think.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 11:52 AM
1

Oh really?? Penetration is considered that closely related to rape and considered to be a dominant act?? Really seems like you're just grasping at straws to explain to put down feminists when it's completely irrelevant. I really, really doubt anyone legitimately believes that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 05:31 AM
2

Yep, I wasn't just thinking of canes and slaves when I said that! I understand what people are saying when they say "submissive." But there are plenty of women who aren't as much into being on the receiving end of those acts, and plenty of men who'd enjoy being on the receiving end of those acts! I think it's an overstatement to say that virtually all women are submissive, because you're basically saying that basically all women are submissive, and there are maybe a few exceptions out there, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 04:03 AM
3

According to this study, when the term "rape" is used, thirty two percent of women studied said they had rape fantasies Of the women who did report them, the majority said that they had them less than once a year, which means that it's probably not their main fantasy. Only five percent of women said they thought about it multiple times a week. Women aren't actually out there masturbating to the thought of being raped very regularly at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 12:05 AM
2

Honestly yeah, I wish it didn't disintegrate into that! I saw something that I thought was incorrect/an overstatement, and I commented. Didn't realize it would upset so many people to this extent. Most of my responses are me just trying to clarify that I didn't mean that women are always dominant or something, but that it's too big of a blanket statement to make. Really that's it!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 11:40 PM
2

Honestly yeah, I wish it didn't disintegrate into that! I saw something that I thought was incorrect/an overstatement, and I commented. Didn't realize it would upset so many people to this extent. Most of my responses are me just trying to clarify that I didn't mean that women are always dominant or something, but that it's too big of a blanket statement to make. Really that's it!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 11:40 PM
2

Honestly yeah, I wish it didn't disintegrate into that! I saw something that I thought was incorrect/an overstatement, and I commented. Didn't realize it would upset so many people to this extent. Most of my responses are me just trying to clarify that I didn't mean that women are always dominant or something, but that it's too big of a blanket statement to make. Really that's it!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 11:40 PM
2

Or it's less common than you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 11:35 PM
3

See that seems like a huge blanket statement to make? I trust my friends, considering any friend who I'd discuss sex with I'm probably pretty close too. It's not like my entire friend group likes submissive guys, but I have friends who have told me that they don't get BDSM because they just like slow more vanilla sex, and I've had friends say they prefer to at least kinda be in control the whole time. It's not like all my friends are these intense dominatrixes or something (but I mean, I do have…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 11:13 PM
3

I'm literally a woman who had been attracted to submissive guys, and guys that let me be in charge for as long as I can remember. It honestly is something that really turns me on! Not to mention, my female friends who have said they "don't get" Fifty Shades of Grey because they don't get why anyone would like being dominated by some guy, or bringing up how obedience in the bedroom is hot, have literally no reason to lie to me. I have plenty of female friends who I regularly talks about sex with,…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 11:03 PM
2

Could you show me where I said that the majority of women are dominant in bed? I never said that submissive women aren't in the majority, I'm just saying that I think it's untrue that all women are submissive. Maybe submissive women are the majority! I totally agree with that, but I myself am very attracted to submissive males, and I know women who aren't submissive in bed. I'm not sure how else to explain this at this point, all I'm saying is that it's too big of a blanket statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 10:59 PM
3

I can guarantee that you have been around some women at some point in your life who aren't submissive in bed, whether that means they prefer being on totally equal ground with their partner, or their being more dominant. And that's not the point, the point is saying that all women are submissive is simply not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 07:50 PM
2

Honestly I'm very very attracted to submissive men! No, in the rest of a relationship I don't want some guy who's always being walked all over by everyone in his life, but in the bedroom I think it's hot to be in charge/be with a really obedient guy. And I mean, in the rest of a relationship it's not like I appreciate a guy who's always trying to control everything/tell me what to do. But it's mostly in the bedroom where I'm super attracted to really, truly submissive guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 07:29 PM
3

I'm not saying that no women are submissive! I'm just saying that I think you're overstating things by saying that "virtually all" women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 07:26 PM
3

Another had a fantasy of having a male harem with a roomful of hot guys to chose from! Is this supposed to be an example of how most women are submissive? Because it really doesn't sound that way to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 07:25 PM
2

What general rule? Yes, sixty two percent would indicate that the majority of women are submissive, but that's not what I'm saying. I don't think sixty two indicates that not being submissive in bed is being a special snowflake. It's not like one percent of women aren't submissive or something, plenty of women aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 07:22 PM
2

In the comment I was responding to, someone did! Also could you maybe not try to be condescending by calling me things like "sunshine?" Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 07:20 PM
3

I could say that every man is a rapist, because every man I've ever come into contact with has been a rapist, but if you told me that you're a man and you're not a rapist, and that you have friends and family members who are men and not rapists, it would negate my blanket statement. That's what I'm saying. You made a blanket statement, I offered evidence that contradicted it. It doesn't matter what women you've met, a blanket statement can't be true if so many women (that I personally know) don'…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 05:38 PM
4

Well in my personal experience I've had tons of female friends, who I've talked about sex with. A lot of them said that they couldn't ever let a guy take control in bed, and I have multiple friends who are women and are very very dominant in bed. Both of us have personal experience with this! Considering how many women exist, I don't think one guy having quite a few sexual partners and friends who are submissive women (more than thirty), is a good enough indicator that virtually all women are su…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 05:36 PM
6

Thank you! Really all I'm trying to say is that it's way too much of a blanket statement to be accurate. I'm just offering evidence that contradicts the idea of "virtually all women" being submissive, it doesn't matter if studies show that just over half of women have rape fantasies. "Virtually all" is a huge overstatement.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 05:30 PM
4

Did you read any of what I just said? Honestly maybe you should just reread it? I'm saying that I'm not telling you my opinion (and you aren't exactly stating an opinion but making a blanket statement). I'm saying that I'm not telling you my opinion, I'm offering evidence that contradicts the blanket statement you made.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 05:27 PM
1

Really my whole point was that "virtually all" was overstating it! "Virtually all" implies that basically everyone does this, but there might be a handful of exceptions out there I can't account for. I disagree, I think plenty of women aren't submissive in bed, even if more women are. Also, I'd think that the number of women who have rape fantasies is smaller than the number of women who enjoy being submissive in bed, but not that much! I mean, probably most people who have rape fantasies mostly…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 05:25 PM
1

But you said that virtually all women are submissive, which doesn't seem like an opinion to me. I mean saying "basically all men are idiotic assholes, that's just my opinion!!" would make me someone who stereotypes men, and makes blanket statements without evidence. I'm a woman, and I'm telling you that I'm dominant in bed, that I have friends who are very dominant in bed, and that I have friends who have specifically told me they don't get BDSM, or really any aspects of dominant/submission sex.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 05:20 PM
5

So you think just over thirty women is a large enough pool to judge from? Do you know how many women exist? Not to mention, it could always be something about you, so your personal experience isn't a great indicator. You could attract submissive women for some reason, or you could just be very dominant in bed, and most women you've slept with have gone with the flow.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 05:16 PM
7

Do you feel like you have so much experience with a large enough group of women that you can say "virtually all women" are submissive? Because I kinda doubt you've had sex with enough women that you can just go by your experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 04:42 PM
4

Pretty much yeah! I'm very very controlling of everything, and that includes sex. And I don't think I'm one of the few exceptions to the rule to be honest. There are plenty of dominant women or vanilla women out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 04:38 PM
5

Honestly, I think that's inaccurate. "Virtually all women" enjoy being dominated? I for one don't at all, and there are LOTS of women out there who are very dominant. There are also lots of women who really are only into pretty vanilla sex, without much Dom/sub undertones.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 04:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter