eichy815 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	On "Misandry isn't as serious because-". They're essentially saying, "Some people DESERVE to get their feelings hurt because of how they were born."	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	11/02/26 10:02 PM
2	On "Misandry isn't as serious because-". But can't both be true? That microaggressions are harmful and\ misandry is a serious problem?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	11/02/26 10:02 PM
3	Have you ever thought maybe boys who don't fit the traditional male archetype are shafted under feminist views? Ah, so then heteronormativity IN ADDITION TO their racism, classism, and misandry? Lovely.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	09/02/26 07:44 PM
5	Have you ever thought maybe boys who don't fit the traditional male archetype are shafted under feminist views? I wonder how they would respond to someone pointing out that making same-sex marriage illegal would also harm lesbian women in committed same-sex relationships...	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	09/02/26 05:59 AM
12	Have you ever thought maybe boys who don't fit the traditional male archetype are shafted under feminist views? Yep. Any time "the wrong kind of man/boy" disagrees with their dogma (as you've just described it), they can simply accuse us of "mansplaining," exhibiting "male fragility," displaying "male entitlement," and/or suffering from "hurt feelings." And the "Pick Me!" Boys will back them up in order to court the approval of the self-described (but woefully misappropriated) "strong feminists."	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	09/02/26 05:58 AM
6	Have you ever thought maybe boys who don't fit the traditional male archetype are shafted under feminist views? The correct answer to your question is "Duh!" And try being autistic, on top of everything else you've described...	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	09/02/26 05:55 AM
1	I'm infuriated by how casual misandry thrives in academia and places that claim to be "forward-thinking" or "progressive." As an "ugly" autistic man, I definitely agree with your analysis here!	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	09/02/26 05:52 AM
1	I'm infuriated by how casual misandry thrives in academia and places that claim to be "forward-thinking" or "progressive." Well, in the minds of neofeminists, systemic racism and systemic sexism/misogyny apparently supersedes any/all other systemic "-isms" on the Oppression Olympics Totem Pole.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	09/02/26 05:44 AM
2	Women thinking they're entitled to physically assault men and get away with it. How the hell is it "mansplaining" for a man to demand that a woman move when she's block his path? Sounds like that particular woman needs to read Rebecca Solnit's 2008 essay...rather than just regurgitating buzz phrases she's heard on TikTok.	/r/MensRights	08/05/25 03:55 AM
6	Men don't need to open up more; society needs to be more perceptive. Exactly. Labels which are becoming more and more nebulous, as people indiscriminately misappropriate such terms according to their own narcissistic whims.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/04/24 09:23 PM
3	Men don't need to open up more; society needs to be more perceptive. Yep. It's a classic case of how the oppressed can become the oppressors.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/04/24 09:22 PM
12	Men don't need to open up more; society needs to be more perceptive. People are fine with men "opening up"...as long as the way in which we "open up" happens to fit their individual comfort levels. Otherwise, if/when we share -- it's suddenly merely "fragility" from us.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/04/24 04:55 AM