TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

el_doherz Archive

View 0 posts and 164 comments by el_doherz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

Because the current meta is that misandry is a perfectly progressive stance. It's bald faced hypocrisy but that's how the game's laid out right now.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 09:15 PM
0

You're blinkered as fuck if you think the right will fix anything. Which party was in charge for the vast majority of the massive immigration spike? Who was in charge when records for immigrants kept being broken? Who was in charge when we replaced EU immigration with a mass wave from countries that are socially incompatible with us? It wasn't the left.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 11:06 PM
110

Nope we're just statistics.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 01:50 PM
52

Let's be real that 11% is likely the ones who are married to men they think are winners. So they're probably already plenty supported.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 10:44 PM
8

He's literally already had a large countersuit tossed out by a federal judge.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 12:46 PM
81

Funny thing is the girls complaining wouldn't want to date a smart fat dude. They also wouldn't want to date a skinny ass dude either. But they're too blinkered to realise that most of the men they actually find attractive are dudes who exercise regularly. Naive idiots that's all.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 05:52 PM
45

The irony is that the example they lead with is so fucking obnoxiously stupid. Has the writer ever been to a train station in the UK? Most don't have large amounts of seating on platforms and what seating is there is grouped together. So dudes are literally choosing to sit in the only available seating and being shamed for it. To be fair at this point unless my train is 30+ minutes away I'm standing well away from any women. I don't want the risk of being in their proximity.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 07:55 PM
2

Yeah I should have mentioned that Labour = Tories on many fronts.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 08:13 PM
26

Because the alternatives aren't really any better. Tories- Fucked us financially for 14 years. Gutted all of our public services and caused Brexit. Presided over the record immigration that's causing societal issues. Run by bigger clowns than Starmer too. Reform - Half the country thinks they're racists and in the other half enough realise what a charlatan Farage is. Lib Dems - Lol never gonna happen. Everyone else - See Lib Dems.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 07:37 PM
10

They're pissed because if he'd stuck the landing they'd have had to come get her. They'd also have had to have some awkward conversations about her actions having consequences. And also having to come to the realisation that their little angel is actually a little shit who nearly got her comeuppance.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 11:09 PM
7

The mistake was going back and listening to any of the bullshit. She cheated, you walked. End of story. Her being alone was her fault, her not having a ride home was her fault etc etc etc. You did nothing wrong and you know it. You wouldn't be here asking if any of what transpired sat right with you.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 11:06 PM
8

Jesus. If a woman I was in a relationship with wrote an article like that about me she'd be single before I even got halfway through. Anyone who looks at a partner with that level of contempt and lacks the basic ability to just fucking ask for the help theu actually want is a toxic drag on life. Yeah young baby and all that shite. But such a toxic relationship lacking basic respect is no place to raise a child.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 01:55 PM
154

Lol by being an employed, single and childless male I'm already a net contributor to the Tax pool. Maybe just maybe they need to look at why the systems so fucked that every other group are net negatives on the tax pool.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:40 PM
9

Well that and the fact that being a teacher is just an awful career choice in the UK Salary around the national average but to work loads of unpaid overtime with the support or resources to actually do your job with increasingly feral children whom you can't even attempt to discipline or control. You can earn more money for 0.1% of the stress doing almost anything else.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 09:37 PM
3

Depends on jurisdiction. In the UK as an example. It cannot be defined as Rape in a legal sense if the perpetrator is not biologically male and using their penis. There is a charge of "forced penetration" which carries the same maximum sentence but it's not rape.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 05:16 AM
14

Not just the US. Even stricter in the UK, as rape is legally defined by the use of a penis to penetrate. So only a biological male can be rapist in the eyes of the law.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 05:14 AM
25

I'd also add a wholesale rework of the education system. There's a reason women are leaving men behind in education and it's not because men are just inherently less intelligent or hard working.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 10:52 PM
1

To be fair that's just politics. The left and the right will happily lie to fucking everyone all the time.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 01:07 AM
4

Eh we've been having similar discussions the entire time I've been on Reddit which is now 15 years. Yet the subs still here. So unless the admins change tack for no reason we're safe.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 06:12 AM
44

Cunt isn't seen as gendered against men though. Whereas insulting male pattern baldness has a very specifically anti male connotation.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 10:21 AM
39

I'm about as far from a Trump supporter as one can be. But reading two X etc makes me understand why the Democrats don't get male votes. The level of disdain to outright hatred displayed even in mainstream spaces rivals or exceeds even the nastiest of incel spaces. The democrats have utterly failed to actually appeal to their electorate. The fact that an orange faced criminal who speaks like a child got elected twice says everything. Yet the Dems just keep doubling down and choosing the same old…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:48 PM
279

Women find value in talking about and through their feelings with a party who is willing to listen. Managing the feelings is a great way to begin managing the problems. Therapy as an idea in of itself isn't bad for men, there could be value in a proper safe space to discuss and understand the ways one feels about their problems. The issues come from gendered therapy practices and the fact that men are taught through experience that talking about their problems only invites more pain and more pro…
/r/MensRights20/10/24 06:08 PM
25

Even if she were correct, which she isn't. What does that say about therapy's effectiveness for men? If going down the path towards extremism and hate is more enticing that the supposed fix to your problems then the fix is as bad a cancer as the problems those men are trying to run away from. If your approach and worldview get less than zero results that means your way of doing things is wrong but god forbid the mainstream and feminists realise that their way isn't working for men. Provide a via…
/r/MensRights20/10/24 06:03 PM
17

That's literally the entire point of the comment you responded to. 0.6% is the amount that actually went that far in the UK at that time.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 01:13 PM
54

The flawed logic is that the victim chose to wear underwear that are seen as for a sexual purpose. Suggesting they went into the situation intending to get down to business and suggesting they wanted to have sex. Obviously an intention to have sex prior to the act isn't the same as consenting at the time of the act. The issue comes down to the "he said, she said" nature of most rape cases where the reliance on only human testimony leaves room for circumstancial bullshit to enter into deliberatio…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 10:30 AM
39

Except it literally isn't statutory rape. In Iceland 17 is above the age of consent. You can judge for the age gap for sure. But atleast be aware of the facts.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 08:57 AM
46

They're gonna lose this zero sum game but make sure they take the rest of us down too. The numbers don't work and there's no interest in doing anything to change that.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 11:15 AM
33

I don't know about that. Many portions of Red pill are equally beneficial to gay men. At its core Redpill was initially: Get fit, dress well, improve your self confidence, improve your ability to converse with people you wanna bang and develop then enforce a set of personal standards for the people you want to bang. None of that is male specific. It's maligned not because it helps dudes but because at its best it talks the unvarnished truth about uncomfortable realities and it's worst its thinly…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 01:46 PM
6

Wrong is a strong word. Wanting something isn't a problem in of itself, unless the thing you want is hateful or harmful. Wanting a partner with a low body count isn't hateful or harmful in of itself. Hypocritical though? Absolutely 100%. Holding others to standards you've failed to uphold yourself is the purest form of hypocrisy. If you're okay with being a hypocrite and you don't act hatefully or harmfully to those who don't meet your criteria then frankly it's fair game. As with all things dat…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 10:33 PM
6

Lol that would be treating the causes and not the symptoms. Same with every major problem hurting British society. Much easier to tack on a bandage to a gaping wound than do the actual hard work to stop the wounds happening in the first place.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 08:05 PM
1

The one accepting bribes should always face more significant consequences They're the ones abusing position and the reason bribes even have any value. No one's going to pay if it doesn't get them anything after all.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 10:48 AM
8

In the same vein. Wouldn't women live longer if we cut off their breasts and cut out their ovaries and uterus too? Breast cancer plus cancers of the repropductive system are significant risk factors for women afterall, not to mention bearing children is in itself a significant risk factor. But we don't make such a stupid argument and non braindead humans dont' make the same dumb argument for men.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 10:33 PM
2

Eh AAA games have been getting shitty in many ways for a decade now. Censorship and political wankery is so low down the list on reasons big buget games suck.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 09:17 AM
8

We should celebrate this sort of shit. It gives any man with self respect and a backbone all the signals he needs to not care for or involve himself in anyway with said women.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 01:33 PM
0

You don't even understand what the article is about. These women haven't been excluded, they are complaining because they planned their retirements around a state pension they were lead to believe over multiple decades would be provided once they turned 60. However in 1995 the law and pension system was changed to stop women getting their pensions earlier than men. So there's a cohort of women born as early as 1950 who were told potentially as late as 45 years old that they were not getting thei…
/r/MensRights22/03/24 05:21 PM
2

Ironic that they call themselves against inequality when they're literally campaigning for special benefits for themselves that men don't get. Funny how an "oppressed" class not only lives longer but also gets government provisions for longer on top of that.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 02:19 PM
1

Eh this concerns the British State pension system which is funded by National Insurance contributions. For anyone who's working and not self employed it's not something you have a choice in. It's deducted before your pay even reaches you. So comparing it poor usage of optional things like 401k's doesn't really equate.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 02:17 PM
2

As Brit and someone who desperately wants anyone but the Tories in power I still have zero trust in Labour If they really actually care about men they should be removing all support for a few of their sexist MP's. There will never be a fair shake at equality or policies helping men when the party has core members who are actively hostile to men and face zero repurcussions.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 04:48 PM
2

About as often as the right do, which is effectively never. For both sides of the aisle it's much easier to pander to your base on inconsequential shit and then bend over for whoever's actually got you Im their pocket.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:28 PM
16

They've yet to realise that Tate and his ilk become popular for a reason. Shaming and failing to address the root cause will just lead to more polarisation and more extremism. But whatever lets continue down the path that's leading towards a society that dies out because it's youth don't want to fuck and can't afford to raise children even if they did.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 04:19 PM
6

Nah plenty of straight dudes are actively gay shaming because of serious homophobic beliefs. And plenty of straight dudes are gayshaming through through using homosexuality as the butt of the joke. Women gayshame too but more often than not that's by means of sexual rejection and deflecting their own sexual rejection.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 04:03 PM
2

Except the actual lesbians themselves given the relative lack of it in lesbian relationships.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 04:00 PM
29

Honestly avoiding women like this is really really simple. Don't date broke ass women who refuse to pay their way. Just because some simps are happy to play sucker and bankroll these women doesn't mean you need to.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 06:02 PM
1

Ah the chant that's verboten in the UK. Admittedly for reasons entirely and utterly unrelated to women and feminism.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 12:21 PM
3

You're absolutely right there. It's the sign of a bad relationship when doing things like that is an obligation. Firstly you should enjoy her company enough that even things that aren't your cup of tea aren't a chore. Secondly you should be comfortable enough in yourself and your relationship to make changes if you're not enjoying things. Thirdly both partners should be invested and empathetic enough to actually work on compromises where they are needed. I think far too many guys settle for whoe…
/r/MensRights17/02/24 03:13 PM
55

Dating is expensive but it's not necessarily a bad thing unless you got yourself a broke girl who doesn't pay her way. Even in relationships that are fully 50/50 financially you end up spending more money because you're doing things you wouldn't otherwise. Single me doesn't eat out as much, drink as much or socialise as much. I also spent less of things like home improvements and nice food at home. None of the above are bad things, just single life is different but cheaper.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 12:10 PM
1

Look I get it is for the benefit of the children but the way we enforce child support is effectively legalised modern slavery.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 04:33 PM
50

Considering the gendered roll out of the vaccine in some countries it's can easily be seen as a gendered issue. E.g. The UK had a rollout that was female only for a long time. E.g I'm in my early 30's and all girls my age were given the vaccine on the NHS as teenagers. It only became available for boys in the same way many years later. Specifically it's only available to boys born after 1st September 2006. That means theres 10-15 years of boys who weren't given equal access.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 05:14 AM
3

This. The only thing the powerful really fear is an actual popular uprising. So sowing division and emnity is a very effective way to stop any form of organised defence against their plundering.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:59 PM
2

It doesn't guarantee pay and also causes huge debt. Blue collar jobs often make more sense for lots of reasons. No debt, higher earnings, often direct linear relationship between effort and pay compared to all the unpaid OT many people do, higher chance of being unionised work, often significantly less toxic working environments than most offices.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 12:14 AM
6

Of course you're seeing some millennial women complaining. The oldest people in that cohort are 42 now. The moaning starts around 30 so we've been listeniing to millenial "where are all the good men" for over a decade already.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 09:53 PM
22

Exploiting men is the entire modus operandi of basically every civilisation ever though. So it's no wonder that nothing gets said. If society stopped exploiting men nothing would get done and society would collapse really quickly.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 03:21 PM
3

TIL that state funded grammar schools still exist. I didn't realise this was still the case as the grammar schools I came into contact with growing up were fully independent private schools. Shows I don't have children as a quick Google of my area shows a fair few of the state funded ones are near me.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 11:13 AM
34

Edit: I was wrong. State funded grammar schools are still a thing in the UK and the school in question is one of those so the above salary range is pretty bang on.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 12:16 AM
4

Just remember when listening to women talk about men they're often literally only talking about the approx 20% they find attractive. The rest just don't even exist in their thoughts at times.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 06:21 AM
9

Academia appears to be trying to get past it with that Nobel Prize. Doesn't mean feminist brainwashing will go away. I've known female barristers, surgeons and prize winning research scientists who would argue the toss about "muh wage gap" despite them knowing of the research and absolutely being smart enough to understand it. So what the fuck are we expecting from the majority who are less educated?
/r/MensRights25/10/23 01:07 PM
3

"Oh so you believe in equality of the sexes?" Then I'd go full malicious compliance on the equality shctick. Not a single mm budged on every little thing being exactly 50%. If she could take that and not lose her shit I'd consider her capable of rational thought and actually considerate of others needs. Therefore she'd be worth a shot. She loses her shit and I'd just carry on till she leaves me whilst having a giggle at her expense. I've found they either grow or weed themselves out extremely qu…
/r/MensRights28/08/23 10:01 AM
3

As someone with a few teacher friends I can also confidently say its not just the money. The job itself is also absolutely shit. Horrendous hours, awful beauracracy, terrible office politics and a general inability to actually do the parts that could be rewarding. I've known a few take a pay cut to get out and that's including men.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 10:08 PM
2

Due process only applies to legal matters not a service relationship like a bank account. Admittedly the laws imposed on the banks regarding not willingly facilitating financial crime do place banks in a bind where they have to consider account closures and freezing as a means to protect themselves if they suspect a customer is potentially involved in these things.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 06:59 PM
2

If the banking laws are like the UK then yeah it's entirely legal. All accounts and services are provided at the sole discretion of the financial institution. Most banks only reserve the nuclear option like this for cases of suspected illegal behaviour (money laundering, fraud, tax evasion and funding crime) or offenses against the bank (think violence or abuse of staff). But there is enough leeway for a bank to close the account for suspect financial abuse and not be in breach of any banking la…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 04:34 PM
-1

Except legally in the UK a 16 year old can absolutely consent. This woman only saw jail because she was a teacher and abused her position.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 04:04 PM
0

There's also the issue that it appears that no physical sexual acts took place before he turned 16 meaning the boy was above the age of consent. If she wasn't a teacher this probably would have never even seen a court room.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 04:03 PM
0

If he was actually 16 when it happened then it's likely not rape in the UK unless she forced or coerced him. 16 is the age of consent here, so if he was a willing participant then it cannot be rape either statutory or otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:59 PM
2

You really have zero clue about how the family law system in most countries works. Evidence doesn't matter in these situations. All his ex needs to do is enough to throw a wrench in any custody process. Which can be achieved by a simple accusation of something heinous. The authorities will have a duty to investigate but due to lack of evidence it will take a literal age to close the case down. Then in the mean time OP loses all custody because the court won't give custody to a suspected abuser. …
/r/MensRights12/03/23 09:51 AM
3

Traditionally most of my views and beliefs would be considered pretty left wing. By American standards I'm very left. But the modern political left is more or less defined and controlled by identity politics. By the modern left's standards I'm right wing which would hurt me if they weren't pursuing a decidedly insane set of ideals. And by right wingers I'd be labelled very lefty. So here I sit with no fucks to give. Both sides are incompetent, lying, self serving fuckwits supported by a populace…
/r/MensRights27/02/23 10:48 PM
17

I'd argue that feminists also have some of the least charitable takes on women. They constantly infantilise other women and remove all of their agency. If you believe feminism women are incapable of basic things like self respect, negotiation or the use of soft power. If feminism was right women would be utterly powerless and downtrodden, funnily enough none of the women in my life are like that barring mental illness being the issue.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:01 AM
8

They exist but not in name. Go to a proper barebones lifting gym frequented by actual meatheads and gym bros. You won't find many if any women in places like that. But they are often absolutely zero frills and lacking any equipment other than weights, racks and benches. So they aren't for everyone.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 08:15 AM
5

Yeah only a small percentage of delusional bigots would actually celebrate it in reality. People forget that an abstract thought experiment/conversation is just that.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:31 PM
27

What counts as persistently staring? Wolf whistling and catcalling are easily avoided as they require conscious decision making and action. But "staring" is a very nebulous phrase and a very nebulous concept. Will it also be prosecuted when women do it? Like fuck sake, anyone who's ever had a very handsome friend will know that women routinely treat such men like slabs of meat in a butchers display. And that's before they start talking or touching.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 02:55 PM
3

Yeah it's a gross way. But people are gonna say it. Especially in a place like this that is a pseudo safe space. Plus we all know that women routinely say far worse. Only takes a glance into twox or any other female sub to see the amount of blatant man hating.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:32 PM
2

As rhetoric its not helpful. But we can't ignore the fact that there are large portions of modern western society that absolutely see female youth as a commodity.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:55 PM
10

Modern University education doesn't really teach independent thought. You'd get shutdown for being offensive just by doing the required devils advocate position.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:10 PM
21

It's not about the money though. As you say 200 quid isn't life changing except for people living on the breadline. The social damage and potential risks associated are much much bigger. Imagine some drunk knobhead at your local boozer decides "fuck it I'm gonna lamp that rapist scum", it really doesn't take much for that to go really really wrong and end up with a life changing physical injuries. Imagine it gets to your employer and colleagues. It would make your working life uncomfortable at b…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 03:16 PM
8

It's not just the papers though. In this day and age it's social media damage too. For example, look at Mason Greenwood. He was permanently ruined before the police even knew there was an alleged offence. Now frankly if he did what it appears he did then fuck him. But the precedent it sets of complete social ruin before the police are even involved is dangerous.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 04:16 PM
2

Reddit is overall very socially left leaning and the social left has always been the breeding ground for identity politics like feminism. Add it the whole situation with powermods being majority feminist and Reddits continual push to be more advertiser friendly too.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 11:18 AM
1

12 Rules does lean awfully heavily on Cain and Abel as examples. That's not exactly the behaviour of someone agnostic.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 03:22 AM
8

Only in real courts with real criminal punishments. Being kicked from a University isn't a criminal punishment. However given the immense cost of some US colleges and the potential damage to future earnings it should be held to that standard IMO.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 11:54 AM
19

Especially in America. Freedom my fucking arse. American work culture is horrendous and the very antithesis of free for the average person.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/22 09:52 PM
5

Those high earning women also still insist on dating up so they really restrict their pool of potential men too.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 11:30 AM
4

Never mind dropping the cunt. You'd risk being assaulted by the bouncers for even removing her hand by force.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:33 PM
9

Lol American women are one of the most privileged classes of humanity to ever have existed. Plus they outlive their alleged oppressors, get more education, have more legal rights and less legal obligations too. The only way they'd be less oppressed is if they went and lived in Western Europe where the general political environment is kinder to both genders.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 03:44 PM
22

Because 1 guy in a million will snap and kill someone after said straight rejection. Cue massive media coverage and spin. Then women everywhere are scared of the insanely rare occurrence. This is despite the risks being substantially lower than the ones they take daily like driving, crossing roads etc
/r/MensRights20/08/22 10:51 AM
8

Oh yeah I imagine it's eerily similar in many Western countries. I can only talk from my experience as a British schoolboy and my nearly becoming a secondary school teacher in the UK though.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 09:23 PM
66

UK schoolboys do get taught about misandry. By being subjected to it for their entire education by their teachers and the curriculum. From day one they are taught that they are inferior academically and the. Spend the rest of the time being told men are monsters and they are at fault for all the worlds problems. Add in sex education that essentially teaches consent as a single sided female only issue and it's a wonder more british men don't go off the proverbial deep end.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 04:55 PM
3

Yes, being able to work out without having to worry about the feelings of women would be a boon. So much of modern gym etiquette is precisely to make women feel safe and welcome etc. Despite that women still want women only gyms because, guess what? Having a space to work out free from intergender politics and social dynamics is nice. So why not offer men the same thing? Mixed gyms aren't going anywhere after all, because the economic case for a service available to 100% of the populace vs only …
/r/MensRights02/04/22 10:16 AM
3

No, it's a logical reaction to the issues surrounding marriage and divorce in many parts of the world. If you were a business you'd never in a million years enter into a contract with such terrible terms as a modern marriage. We are talking of a contract that outs you at a minimum 50% financial liability for another human being and allows for the wholesale transfer of wealth when its terminated. However terminating bears no significant costs, has no obligations to meet and in many places ignores…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 10:05 AM
2

That's jurisdiction dependant. Not everywhere has the BS that is common law marriage.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 06:42 AM
33

Pretty sure their sub rules state you get banned for posting anything and being male.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 07:39 PM
3

Maybe the police angle would have a larger effect if people chose to take the race angle. However Sabina Nessa was also found dead in a park in London a few months later. Again young, attractive woman out alone who got murdered. Yet there was nowhere near the national outrage, no political grandstanding and likely no lasting legacy compared to Sarah Everard.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 10:48 PM
33

Exactly the same as with Sarah Everard in London, conventionally attractive young white woman gets murdered and it was a bigger deal than the other 600 UK murder victims from the same year combined. Its easy news and easy outrage, combined with a bunch of societal BS that amplifies it and silences any other narrative.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 07:37 PM
8

If the 16k figure for average salary for a full time novelist is correct then it isn't discrimination. In the UK right now I can earn 18.5k working at a local petrol station or warehouse with zero experience. Hell I know industries where you can start with no experience and no skills that will pay you 20k+ and train you from scratch. So it's little wonder that men aren't writing.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 11:00 PM
13

What backwater shithole do you live in that they teach women that their bodies are for male pleasure? Western countries don't teach that shit. They teach female focused consent to both genders from a young age.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:34 PM
5

That's r/science. They nuke anyone and everyone. Comment graveyards are the norm there.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:31 PM
13

To be fair R/science nukes everyone and anyone. Always makes me smile seeing the absolute graveyards they leave once they've moderated.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:30 PM
7

Nah the general public has infinitely more empathy for animals than they do men.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 08:08 AM
1

Eh those men often do things like go into trades or apprenticeships and often end doing as well or better than the majority of those who got degrees.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 08:21 AM
41

Realistically they are responding to market forces. After all it doesn't seem far fetched to suggest that female shoppers account for a larger proportion of spending. Businesses are often relatively politically agnostic until it affects their finances. Even the ones who are more politically aligned tend to do so as a branding and marketing exercise.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 11:36 AM
1

You've again written an awful lot of words to avoid actually dealing with the point I made. Ironically the only time you even came close was after you'd moved the goalposts. You explicitly used Fortune 500 CEO's, sports stars and World Leaders as your argument. You can't then backpedal to "a fulfilling and rewarding level of success." As before, your entire diatribe is based off of wildly inaccurate assumptions about me, my life and my views. Using baseless conjecture as the crux of your point i…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 11:25 AM
2

Lol so you wasted 4 paragraphs to attempt a slight of someone of whom you know nothing about. All you've done is blow misguided and incorrect ad hominem smoke to disguise your inability to actually argue the point. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 10:05 AM
2

Here's the real truth. Being a billionaire, top professional athlete or fortune 500 CEO is basically utterly irrelevant to 99.9999% of the human population regardless of gender. The odds of it happening are vanishingly small for all but the 0.01% born in the right time, circumstances and society. So why on earth should that be used as an argument to shape policy for everyone else? Why should it be used as a stick to beat down men and boys? For normal people success is often in direct competition…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 08:39 AM
9

Oh that article is nausea inducing. "A key theme of the bromance, on the other hand, was the freedom to express themselves without judgment, and to engage in emotional intimacy without fear." Not a single thought expressed about how potentially the behaviour of women in romantic relationships that prevent men from expressing themselves are potentially the problem. If men felt safe and fulfilled in their romantic relationships with women they wouldn't be retreating to the safe space of male frien…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 12:14 PM
3

800 murders on average per year in the UK in recent years. That means potentially there are over 700 people murdered in the last 12 months that combined will receive less attention than Sarah Everard's death.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:47 AM
1

Ahh the joys of the duluth model. Sexist policing is a feature not a bug at this point.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:41 AM
3

Yep average of nearly 800 people a year murdered in the UK over the last four years. One attractive white woman gets killed by a stranger in London and we'll hear more about it alone than the other 700+ people who were murdered in the last 12 months combined. Its sad and scary that society can be so massively outraged by this one event yet comparitively silent on the hundreds of others tragically killed.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:37 AM
5

The whole reaction to the death of Sarah Everard is low key kind of scary. In the UK there is an average of 800 murders per year for the last 4 years or so. Most go by with little national press coverage. Yet in this one case the national news is all over it and women all over the country are getting riled up on a level rarely seen. I absolutely see this being a sadly pivotal moment in the UK that they will use to enforce some utterly bullshit rules on men.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:18 AM
3

You can't assert that the low conviction rate is solely down to false accusations. Just because lots of cases are too flimsy to make it to court doesn't make them all false. Rape prosecution is not and never will be a black and white issue. So you can't talk about it like it is one. Rape even when it has actually occurred is an absolute nightmare to convict because barring immediate rape kits, good forensic evidence or incriminating CCTV it becomes a he said she said game. As long as we live in …
/r/MensRights11/03/21 08:35 AM
1

Yep the government needs to retain talent as much as any business so they have to pay a salary that's close enough to private firms.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 07:25 PM
0

That relationship was also a cause of a major fuck up on her part. She had a confidential phone conversation regarding one of her partners team mates career whilst in earshot of his stream. So she leaked publically the state of a players contract issues massively lowering his negotiating power with other orgs.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 05:30 PM
-1

She should have been cancelled for the dardoch situation.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 08:48 AM
11

Lol she's already dating one of their players.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 08:46 AM
2

Lol the worlds filled with desperate dudes who enable sexist shit stains like this just for a chance at getting their pp wet.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 10:01 PM
1

Eh with the British justice system and failure to appropriately charge you couldn't guarantee it. I've known a few people get off because of CPS overcharging in search of a plea deal.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 09:37 PM
33

17 assault convictions and is allowed to roam free. That is just mental. Plus attacking someone with a bottle should be a weapons charge, GBH or wounding with intent which are all more severe charges than plain old assault.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 03:17 PM
2

Age of consent in the UK is 16 so no laws broken and by definition not a paedophile. Yes a 30+ woman sleeping with a 16 year old raises some questions regarding experience and manipulation but there is ample reason why she didn't get totally ruined by the press for doing it.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 08:33 AM
1

Thats been running all over Manchester for ages now sadly.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 05:32 PM
46

Bear in mind she had a previous drink driving conviction too. Should be a minimum 10 year ban or lifetime disqualification for what she did.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 08:05 AM
2

I swore off marriage whilst eating cake at a garden centre cafe. Every single older married dude in there looked fucking miserable as hell to be there. Just downtrodden and soul destroyed. Its silly, but it really stuck with me as a perfect crystallisation of my own thoughts on the matter.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 09:33 AM
1

To be fair r/science moderation leaves lots of threqda all across the spectrum looking that. They really are strict about enforcing their standards and a thread like that is just begging for people to ignore all their rules.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 07:51 AM
2

The fact that rape is such a he said she said crime is the issue here. It cuts both ways, rape is probably simultaneously the most under convicted and most falsified crime. That which makes it easy to falsify is exactly the thing that makes it incredibly hard to convict. The difficulty to convict is essentially never going away whilst "guilty beyond all reasonable doubt" is the standard considering that the nature of most rapes is that the only thing in doubt is the presence of consent. It also …
/r/MensRights13/09/19 12:38 AM
16

Just refuse. If the ring means she won't marry you then bullet dodged. Or better yet, don't marry and avoid having the risk of divorce being the sword of damocles any time your relationship isn't sunshine and roses.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 07:47 AM
1

It should be capped at the time required to get a degree + three months. If the party has a relevant degree then it should be 12 months. That way the party has time to get educated and find a job. Any more is just financing someones choice not to work.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 07:20 AM
1

Not many things make me genuinely sad. This is heartbreaking though. The pure callousness in that shove is awful, just utter contempt for another human being that's completely undeserved.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 08:53 PM
2

lol serene public transport, girl thats how civil wars start.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 01:38 PM
6

A judge openly saying this should removed from their position. Any judge with a statistically significant sentencing bias should be investigating pending removal from office. Pretty simple really.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 07:37 PM
6

People like you are why this shit stays behind closed doors. Retards shaming and the oversized consequences for man physically defending himself from a woman are why men like this guy get their lives ruined. You and your ilk are a stain on the gene pool.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 11:31 AM
3

Compliant people are the issue. If men actually stood up for themselves properly we'd see a lot of stupid shit like this disappear overnight. Women that currently coast by purely on having a vagina but no positive attributes would have to work on themselves or be left alone. If we just changed the compliant masses and the bottom feeders the whole dating market would change for the better for everyone. We'd likely see less massively obese people, we'd probably see less people with outright mental…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 11:20 AM
6

What is dead may never die.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 08:35 PM
2

Remeber different countries have differing ages of consent, marriage etcera. 17 isn't an issue in many countries.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 11:27 AM
-3

Plus it's been all his friends lulplh If you u
/r/MensRights26/05/18 11:41 AM
-3

Until hi you justuijustuhobuu love him home hl
/r/MensRights26/05/18 11:40 AM
1

It's Man United vs Chelsea so no arsenal involved.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:07 AM
5

For certain, just think about how the reactions are different when gendered assault occurs. A woman slaps and beats a man in public and the biggest reaction they will likely get is laughter. A man slaps a woman and he will likely end up on the receiving end of white knight "justice", an arrest record and social ostracisation. Hell even raising your voice as a man in an argument is seen as tantamount to actual violence. So we have two genders, one who faces literally no real repercussion bar the …
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:53 PM
6

True enough but if you did that prior to divorce in order to specifically avoid pay outs I think most judges would roast you over hot coals for purposefully attempting to avoid paying.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:20 PM
2

Raising your voice as a man is treated the same practically as actual physical violence. Hell I've got dirtier looks for raising my voice than I've seen women get for attempted murder. It's sick how policed we've become as a gender.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:33 PM
3

Yep reaction time isn't a determining factor past a certain point. Counterstrike GO which is Thorin's area of expertise is a basically mental exercise when playing competitively. What really matters at that level is map knowledge, situational awareness and adaptability to your circumstances. A good player will always do everything possible to avoid being in any engagement that isn't weighted in their favour. A battle of reactions is 50/50 so something to avoid where possible.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:25 AM
2

Laugh then engage in something else. Deny her any attention like you would a toddle having a tantrum.
/r/askTRP13/02/17 06:04 PM
2

I always hated the old "married men earn more" being trotted out as a positive. Working harder and longer to earn more under pain of romantic trouble at best and divorce and financial ruin at worst isn't a benefit to men. It's an obligation that takes its toll physically, emotionally and lowers life spans. After all the number one cause of marital strife is often said to be money, so guess where that stress lands.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 10:04 AM
6

Even if it's a good idea, fuck Piers Morgan.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:27 PM
2

Nothing to see here guys. The SJWs and the democrats won't learn from this. They'll retreat to their safe spaces and echo chambers, blame the patriarchy and white people as a whole. They'll ignore that its DNC corruption that gave trump such an easy track into office. They'll ignore that both parties are completely divided without clear identity or leadership. They'll ignore that this is what happens when you have a populace that's seen nothing but stagnation and regression for 10 years now. The…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:52 PM
3

Likely she's from somewhere called Marin, probably Marin County California. It's a clumsy headline but I'm betting that the intended meaning.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 01:16 PM
1

Exactly. Never met a woman who wasn't a filthy hypocrite about prenups, they'd all advice to get one to protect their own wealth but dear lord the outrage that ensues if a man wants one.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 08:55 AM
-1

Trump doesn't even have the support of his own party nailed down. So he's going to get fucking railed by the senate and the house every time he tries to implement his policies At least Clinton has got her party in the bag an might actually get to pass policies and laws. Your choosing between a shit sandwich and a shit souffle. A leftist corporate slave who could get shit done vs the freethinking right winger who will flounder in the house and senate. Both are shit choices and for most it's which…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 08:06 AM
25

She only got jail because of the medical record tampering I bet.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:19 AM
3

Yep exactly that, just exchange status of birth for perceived quality of education and it's a new class system that heavily favours middle class white women. As evidenced by the number of articles about this very ohenomenon of dating "down".
/r/MensRights07/06/16 10:18 PM
3

No surprise really. Think about it like this. Gay men are getting married at a lower rate for many of the same reasons that straight men are turning away from marriage. The financial risks and the fact that it is an outmoded institution that is in no way required in our modern world.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 08:30 PM
3

Whilst there is merit to no strike laws for certain industries the workers need some way to have their collective power seen. Simple fact is for every junior doctor I know it's a case of this new deal amounting to an involuntary pay cut of a not insignificant amount. We can't really live in a world where we let employers slash people salaries without choice without some method for employees to fight back. Especially in industries with a monopoly player like the government in this case.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 06:58 AM
-1

Because its not what businesses value. Businesses place an incredibly high value on traditional hours, long periods of unbroken work and face to face work. So they will pay more for it. The only way to change that is to change what businesses value, as you can't force them to pay more for things they don't actually want in anything resembling a free competitive market.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 12:03 PM
1

Hoping for no lawsuit is naive. The fact is this; at best your reputation at this school is ruined beyond normal means of repair without the accuser willingly recanting their statement. Aka not going to fucking happen. Just look at Jackie Coackley or Emma Sulcowiz, both proven to be almost certainly false but they have doubled down instead of admitting fault. The other option is be proactive and protect yourself from the school and such accusations by using the law to your advantage. Fact is thi…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 02:43 PM
1

And nothing of value was lost.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:19 PM
7

This isn't a men's rights issue IMO. Cyclists in the US have very little legal protections shitty sentences like this are so common for either gender.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:16 AM
5

Why not? She's specifically set out to segregate a group based solely on race. She promotes that agenda on twitter and at her student union too. She has publicly stated "kill all white men". That's racial hatred on her part and by using her position in the union she's pushing such beliefs in a public place. If that doesn't qualify as inciting racial hatred then the law serves no purpose.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:57 PM
4

Yeah she would qualify for inciting racial hatred under the Public Order Act 1986 or the Race Relations Act 1976.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:47 PM
4

Actually by UK law she could be charged with inciting racial hatred. Its a silly petition but its not complete lunacy.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:45 PM
3

Exactly see this article from the Daily Fail. Women, even those who are academic and career high achievers tend to opt out of full time work at a far greater rate than men. Among NHS consultants (specialty trained doctors who are superior in rank to normal doctors) 38% of females opt for part time versus 5% of the men.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 12:33 PM
1

Alla bout checking dem harrasment boxes. Get enough non PC accusations thrown in and it makes the company look far worse leading to higher payouts to satiate the press. Or maybe fling shit until it sticks, you never know with SJWs, they may be dumb but they wrote the book on this trumped up bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:20 PM
61

The graduating numbers mean nothing when females tend to gravitate to less useful degrees and continue to not make best use of their education by taking maternity or going part time. They don't want equal opportunity, just equal outcomes. Totally ignoring the fact that the well paid men they aspire to match often work in fields women choose not to get into and often sacrifice the much vaunted work life balance that women are far more conscious of.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:02 PM
13

Because that gender is much much more likely to give you money. Just imagine how high a percentage of the average western economy would go under if women spent like men did? The high streets and shopping malls would be desolate.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:15 PM
3

Its indentured servitude simple as.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 11:54 PM
2

Milo is gay himself. So its unlikely to be from a homophobic place, it is however as misguided conclusion that totally ignores that more men are openly gay because its acceptable in mainstream society now. It has little to do with toxic women.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 02:37 PM
2

Nevermind the efficiency savings I've never understood the whole idea of maintaining the status and living standards. Those increases were gained only due to being in a relationship, you violate that relationship by divorce and you should cede any benefits attached to it full stop. The current situation is utter bollocks.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:54 AM
15

Following the logic of this law 90% of the married men I know are abuse victims beholden to their wives financial whims and isolated from their friends. Obviously that will never be said or even thought of. Tell your wife she needs to get a job and you'll be up on abuse charges.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 07:33 PM
3

Not wise. Chloroform exposure can quickly and permanently damage lung tissue.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:10 AM
1

That's what a conviction will do. In the US I'd imagine its the same if someone is found guilty by a court. Otherwise they are still technically covered by the victim protection rules.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 05:32 PM
11

/r/DeadBedrooms is clearly an absolute motherlode of rape culture then.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 02:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter