el_throwaway_returns Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-1	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" Yes. That's why people still keep replying to me. Because I totally didn't strike a nerve by telling some inconvenient truths.	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 11:26 PM
-2	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" You can have a hypothetical about real situations. Unless you are arguing that sexism is never, ever a factor in the hiring process. This reply probably came off more clever in your head. TIL "What would you do if you were attacked by a bear?" isn't a hypothetical because you haven't really been attacked by a bear. Genius.	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 06:56 PM
-5	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" It's a non reply though. A hypothetical can be about a real thing. Total brainlet response, now that I think about it.	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 06:46 PM
-21	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" You really can't help yourself with the conspiracy theory crap can you?	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 05:33 PM
-16	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" People are downvoting me for posing a hypothetical question about bias because they refuse to acknowledge even a hypothetical bias. The real freakout is in the replies to my posts.	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 05:21 PM
-2	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" Okay. But what if it didn't? Do you understand how hypothetical situations work? Does anyone in this sub? Doesn't seem like it tbh	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 05:11 PM
-4	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" Okay. But again let's assume as a hypothetical that they are. Is it okay for them to be this way? Why are male majorities unquestionable while the same is not true of female majorities.	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 04:55 PM
-16	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" That's not the point. They say that the existence of a male dominated industry isn't a bad thing. So I'm asking if that would include male dominated industries that force their male majority.	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 04:43 PM
-45	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" Even if the majority is being upheld unfairly?	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 04:25 PM
-8	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" Okay. But it seems to me that instead of acknowledgement of the issue you guys want to pretend like a meritocracy is already in place. There isn't. Let's hire the best people	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 04:15 PM
-95	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" Okay but how is any if that relevant to hiring more female writers?	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 04:00 PM
-24	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" No, I think she just wants more female writers and is annoyed that the responses are intentionally ignoring the fact that talented writers can be overlooked because they are women. It's really easy to pretend like there's a meritocracy going on when it works in your favor.	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 03:36 PM
-45	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" It's pretty clear from the context (who needs context? just be angry lawl) that she's referring to writers in the writing room sense. Not authors.	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 03:26 PM
-127	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" Right but how is that anything but a "What about the men?" deflection when discussing a lack of female writers? Is this just something that people aren't allowed to notice? Because it certainly seems like this is another one of those "Sit down and shut up" issues for reactionaries.	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 03:21 PM
-221	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" Or, now hear me out, the people replying to her weren't replying in good faith. Funny. A male dominated industry is a problem. But one all-female writing room and it's the end of the world.	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 03:17 PM
-63	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" None of that shit going on here. No sir	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 03:14 PM
-198	"Suggesting equality will get you blocked, bigot!" Well, no. What she wants is to see more women working in her field. And she got a little annoyed at pedants coming in and saying "but what about muh men?" As if that's an issue edit: damn all these replies really show me how not upset you guys are about the truth	/r/MensRights	13/09/19 03:13 PM
1	A great analogy for the earnings gap Do you think that distracting from the main point makes them wrong?	/r/MensRights	25/08/19 10:06 PM
0	Buzzfeed's misandrist double standards Those articles look like they've been written by two different people.	/r/MensRights	09/02/17 07:25 PM
2	17-Year-Old Faces Child Porn, Assault Charges for Consensual Sex with Girlfriend If cops are this immature then maybe we need to reconsider how much power we give them.	/r/MensRights	16/09/16 08:03 PM
1	Anyone notice how if a biological aspect is found in women that advantages them more then men it's an automatic sign of their superiority but if men are found with a biological advantage then it "must" be socially constructed? Uh, what sort of discussion? That we should breed a race of supermen who will die out in a generation because they're all dudes? Talking about biological differences doesn't have to lead to eugenics.	/r/MensRights	26/06/16 07:46 AM
6	TIL of the Global Gender Equality Report, which states if a country is gender equal, or not. It says that "Information about gender imbalances to the advantage of women is explicitly prevented from affecting the score" because "women are strictly disadvantaged compared to men." So, not to stereotype, but it seems to be that a lot of Asian and African nations are pretty misogynistic. So how did so many of them manage to get ahead of the United States? That just feels weird to me.	/r/MensRights	25/05/16 05:42 AM