| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ukrainian women in armsDude you do not understand what sufficient evidence is. You are making claims about people's attitudes and a google search result is not enough to prove it. The search result is interesting, and the basis for a possible interesting research question, but it does not in itself contain enough information to make a causal inference. I've read quite a bit that's how I understand how it is a person can reach a sound conclusion. Look I'm sorry I started off so harshly, as I do actually get where you'r… | /r/MensRights | 17/11/22 05:05 PM |
| 2 | Ukrainian women in armsNo evidence? No bitches? | /r/MensRights | 16/11/22 09:02 PM |
| 1 | Ukrainian women in armsWhat historical precedence? Have a primary or secondary source that backs up your assertion? Can you make a better sociological analysis than "government says it thus it will be believed and repeated in all circumstances?". One counterargument: Governments do not necessarily determine or completely control human culture or else revolution would be impossible. Because a propagandist intends to popularize a view does not mean that they will actually be successful. You're making a lot of baseless c… | /r/MensRights | 16/11/22 06:10 PM |
| -13 | Ukrainian women in armsDo you think that government propaganda is a good way to understand how the average citizen thinks? Do you think that a picture of a person in uniform is sufficient evidence to make a precise prediction of future human behaviour? Were you dropped on your head as a child? | /r/MensRights | 16/11/22 11:09 AM |
| 1 | Why are books so lowkey sexist against men?Just dropping Nietzsche casually lmfao. I highly doubt anyone could productively interpret him without extensive knowledge of philosophy. | /r/MensRights | 16/11/22 10:55 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter