TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

elitez Archive

View 4 posts and 325 comments by elitez on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yes, I did. Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 04:40 PM
1

Whoops, I completely typo'ed that. It was supposed to read that women carry out 60-70% of overall child abuse.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 04:39 PM
-1

Ok, I can't remeber where I saw them, but roughly two thirds of child sexual abuse is carried out by men. However overall about 60-70% of child abuse of any kind is carried out by women.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 05:04 PM
1

Known Troll. DOWNVOTE, REPORT AND IGNORE
/r/MensRights07/03/12 05:01 PM
1

Well, do we want to be just as close-mided as feminists? No. We want to be better than them, by supporting Free Speech.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:23 PM
-4

However, the post has the red background, rather than burichan, and as /b/ is the only non-burichan board where this sort of stuff can be posted.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:14 PM
1

Brilliant Qanan. I just had a look through, and you've mentioned everything in an easy to understand way.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:11 PM
6

We already have /r/GenderEgalitarian .
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:04 PM
1

women under 30 tend to earn more than their male counterparts. True, and it's by around 5%, but that can be easily explained as the logical consequence of the female ovverrepresentation at university.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:27 PM
0

True, but even when those reasons are accounted for, there is still on average around a 1-2% difference in income.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:11 PM
3

I also really wish paternity testing were mandatory I don't think it should be mandatory. It should be easily available, but not mandatory.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:09 PM
6

Thats good, because I think you're stupid too.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 08:51 PM
3

For posterity, am I a troll in your opinion?
/r/MensRights04/03/12 12:53 PM
4

Please shut the fuck up, stupid woman. You sound like an SRS troll. I actually cannot believe you just called the most active female member of /r/mensrights a stupid woman, an SRS troll, and accused her of being a female supremacist. And then you wonder why nobody listens to you. Oh, and a saved imgur of your post.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 12:34 PM
-3

size of government from 2% GDP to 40% GDP. No, that was done by returning male soldiers who didn't want the country they'd fought for to abandon them. And it was a good thing.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:59 PM
3

Anyone can go and make a statement like that, calling themselves anonymous. There is only one generally accepted google plus page for anonymous currently- AntiSec.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:40 PM
0

Thank you. I've always wondered who pn6 was.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:24 PM
3

Ander is what drives the MRM as with any civil rights movement. What's ander? Also: But since this reddit is anti-MRM How is this reddit anti-MRM?
/r/MensRights03/03/12 03:30 PM
1

Yes I have had disagreement with feminists. Sometimes they've been wrong, sometimes I've been wrong.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 01:08 PM
7

t that men occupy most positions of power This is the apex fallacy. Simply because most powerful positions are held by men does not mean that men on average are more powerful. Men also occupy most positions with no power whatsoever. You need to realise that a man in power doesn't mean that all men are powerful.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 10:20 AM
4

Someone also needs to remind her that men are a minority. Women are the majority.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 09:23 AM
1

Is it actually? However, condoms are available free at any clinic, there's no need for them to be on.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:19 PM
8

Aww. The little baby trolls have come out from under their bridge. Better downvote, report and ignore.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 10:27 PM
4

Exactly what do people have against subsidised contraception. The entire point of having health insurance is that everyone pays for everyone else's healthcare, and they pay for yours. Contraception, like it or not, is healthcare. It's also a damn sight cheaper than the cost of unwanted babies.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 10:22 PM
22

She got one thing right though: There is no such thing as "reverse racism" and "reverse sexism". They are both just racism and sexism, respectively.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 08:17 PM
2

Feminism is intrinsic to leftism. Men's Right's activism is also intrinsic to leftism. This is because egalitarianism is intrinsic to leftism.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 05:50 PM
1

That means that the different social security ages and that different health funding are MRA issues, not the welfare state itself.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 05:27 PM
1

Very well I will. I need a break from this anyway. It's not good for my blood pressure to be cramped in between traditionalists and misandrists like this anyway. I'm coming back to this subreddit in a week. And, for the record, he expanded to a call for others first.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:16 PM
2

Which site is this by the way?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:14 PM
4

I have been participating in a dialogue. I have had the utmost patience with Jeremiah. I have ignored him every time he has called me a faggot or a mangina. I have been patient every time he has slandered me. I have been patient every time he has said that democracy is bad, that only certain people should be allowed to vote. Finally, today, my patience wore out.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:13 PM
4

Ok then what activism have you done?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:06 PM
3

How much have you done for the movement?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:05 PM
6

Look, if Jeremiah would stop slandering me, calling every other person a "faggot mangina", and stopped getting hurt at my every comment, then maybe I would.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:04 PM
3

How is anyone responsible for a close family member being shot, or dying through illness or cancer?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:02 PM
3

He started it. I had to defend myself from his slander.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:01 PM
3

Jeremiah said that female suffrage was responsible for every MRA issue. I responded angrily, and maybe said something a little bit wrong with regards to family breakup. He then called the waaambulance, and then it started.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:01 PM
3

Wasn't a men's rights issue until it was outlawed for women and not men (post women's suffrage). Then it became an issue of inequality. Still an issue that men don't have a right to bodily integrity, no matter what rights women have. Wasn't a men's rights issue until women got suffrage without conscription. Previous to women's suffrage, the risk of conscription was the responsibility men paid in return for the right to vote. Still an MRA issue that millions of men were and are forced to die over…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:58 PM
2

Or maybe if we get rid of the welfare state it will affect innocent women, whose husbands have, say, died?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:56 PM
3

Or rather- stop taking me out of context, stop taking me out of context.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:54 PM
0

Fine then. I will.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:53 PM
5

There are many other reasons why a family would be destroyed, and not all of them are MRA issues. The only one that is is when a father is forcibly removed from his family.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:49 PM
2

I said that the destruction of the family is a societal issue. Thanks for quote mining. I'll do one for you now "Only some women should be able to vote" - JeremiahMRA
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:45 PM
5

Google "Veterans not having to pay for the cost of treating their war injuries" and get back to me. Google "Without the welfare state, child support laws would be even more draconian as the state would have to force men to make up for the lost benefits of single mothers.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:43 PM
-2

Can I chuckle to myself as I ask you to ponder why that might be so? ;) Because it is so brilliant that we need no other left-wing MRA forum. This is also by far the largest MRA forum in existence.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:40 PM
5

Really? Because I think rationally. Explain to me why the welfare state is an MRA issue. Oh and while you're at it please also explain why you are a mod of /r/Rights4Men?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:39 PM
6

Fathers being forced out of their family is not the same as families being destroyed. The former is an MRA issue, the latter is a societal issue.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:37 PM
3

Gee I thought the state stealing fathers' children away from them and forcing them to pay their ex-wives mone You didn't mention that. You said single-motherhood. I accepted that the problem in the quote is a problem, but that female suffrage is not a cause of it. I thought the spread of feminism over the last 100 years to remove the rights of men and grant women special privileges, resulting in boys falling way behind in school, skyrocketing rates of male suicide, skyrocketing rates of domestic…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:26 PM
7

NO. ONLY A FUCKTARD WOULD ASSUME THAT THE SOLUTION TO MEN'S RIGHTS ISSUES IS TO REMOVE FEMALE SUFFRAGE. welfare state, widespread single motherhood, the destruction of the family, THE WELFARE STATE IS NOT AN MRA ISSUE. SINGLE MOTHERHOOD IS ONLY AN MRA ISSUE IF THE FATHER HAS TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT. THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY IS NOT AN MRA ISSUE. CIRCUMCISION IS AN MRA ISSUE. IT HAS EXISTED FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS. THE ATTITUDE OF MALE DISPOSABILITY IS AN MRA ISSUE. IT HAS EXISTED FOR HUNDREDS OF …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:49 PM
8

No he doesn't. He pushes away fucktards who think that this is the place to say that women shouldn't have the right to vote- as you did, as I remember.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:30 PM
14

To be honest, the female privilege wikipedia page is pretty shit, and mentions nothing about the overall structures which enforce female privilege. Still, it shouldn't be deleted.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:16 PM
59

IMO it was posted to WTF not because the poster doesn't think that men can be victims of rape too, but that the wording implies that you're not a real man unless you get raped. Still shouldn't have been posted there.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 07:42 PM
5

Exactly how the fuck is this subreddit a male-unfriendly place?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:54 PM
-7

cult to make the case that he represent the right side of the aisle. Do we really need to represent the far right side of it (by european standards, centre right by american ones). This happens to be literally the only large left-wing MRA forum. I'd like it to stay left wing.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:52 PM
1

True, however the first police interview, when often a victim has just suffered whatever crime it was, is not the time nor place to investigate the victim. The police should call them up and arrange for them to come in maybe a few days later, and then the questioning starts.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:16 PM
1

He was saying that we should talk about m/m and f/f as well as m/f and f/m violence. He wasn't ignoring f/m violence at all.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 11:10 PM
6

It's a bit long, I'd rather just hand out a picture of a small man, with injuries, along with the tagline- "50% of domestic violence victims are men. They are the invisible half."- or something along those lines- nobody will bother to read the long one. And put a link to a website or something.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 11:08 PM
0

I personally think it is a good analogy- woman giving away sex or having it taken away, versus men giving away money or having it taken away. Victim blaming should be gone in all forms- police should simply record it down and let the courts sort it out, unless there are obvious, enormous holes in the story. Separating out the false claims before they go to court is probably not worth the damage that would be done to actual victims.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:59 PM
1

Dorms are not gender separated whatsoever here in the UK, apart from all the female only dorms, which exist despite women making about 70% of undergraduates in the UK
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:53 PM
2

So where are these man only dorm halls? Oh wait they don't exist. Honestly I would have thought you SRS people would have something better to do than troll the actual egalitarians.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:52 PM
0

either live as a slave or to die as a free man. Or you could move country. Not the perfect option (legal paternity surrender would be that) but a damn sight better than suicide.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:20 PM
3

/r/Rights4Men is that way if you want to find them.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:14 PM
1

You are also proudly homophobic and bigoted. You are troll free, except for you yourselves.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:23 PM
2

What consenting adults do in their own private bedrooms, with or without cameras, is no business of ours whatsoever.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:21 PM
2

I shall in future. However, he linked to manhood academy- that's all the evidence you need to determine that he was a troll.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:19 PM
7

THIS IS A KNOWN TROLL. DOWNVOTE. REPORT. IGNORE.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 04:57 PM
2

It's the only subreddit I've ever seen that has a more trigger happy ban policy than /r/ShitRedditSays .
/r/MensRights26/02/12 04:54 PM
1

Edit: forgot to mention you might find yourself banned from that subreddit for criticising it in a different subreddit. I know I was. As have I- my post above got me banned. Not like I actually want to post in that subreddit.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 03:06 PM
5

Welp, if I can't see that ad, then I don't know what I'm donating to, and so my potential £50 donation must go elsewhere.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:24 AM
12

No. If you see in the bottom right-hand corner of the linked image, there is an advertisement for /r/Rights4Men. Upon goin to that subreddit, I found that same image posted on their front page. From that my deduction was that this poster is here advertising for /r/Rights4Men. He is also a regular poster there.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:32 PM
10

I have just looked at that subreddit, and I didn't like what I saw. Homophobia, hatred, that place was pretty shit. Although it isn't as bad as manhood academy, I will give you that.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 05:53 PM
1

No, but his complete disregard for every promise he ever made, and his complete inability to stand up to the Republicans did. Then I saw the Republican candidates, and realised that Obama may be feminist, but at least he's sane.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:44 PM
24

I think that woman isn't friend material.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:21 AM
2

Seeing that has made me realise something- I automatically believe someone who says they were falsely sccused of rape, I don't even bother to see if their story matches up.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:15 AM
1

No, you accused ignatiusloyola of an ad hominem attack, almost immediately after, you, in a reply to a post of his, made an ad hominem attack against him.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:12 AM
3

After all, as the mathematics of a coin toss shows, the average is statistically pretty unlikely to happen.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:05 AM
1

You launched an attack against ignatiussoyola, in return you got a counter attack with the exact same structure as yours. And in response to your original question. It is wrong to force a child into any role. Let them choose for themselves. If they want to act masculine then fine. If they want to act feminine then fine. If they want to act in the middle then that's fine too.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:04 AM
1

But you seem a lot less trollish than you did a week ago.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 08:04 PM
2

Didn't you used to be a troll?
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:35 PM
2

I have similar disagreements, but like I said, Obama ripped up every promise he made, and the other Republicans- my dislike for them is pretty self explanatory.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 02:21 PM
-2

No, government is not a tool of oppression. Government as a tool can be used for anything, and indeed governments have done a lot of good in the past, and will in the future.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:14 AM
2

Government is not a person. Government is a tool. A tool that has been used aginst us. Instead of destroying it, we must turn the tool around and use it for our benefit.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:06 AM
3

Trolling a troll? Interesting.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:04 AM
2

I don't even live in the USA, but I support Ron Paul- he's the only candidate who seems like he's going to keep his promises (even if I disagree with them).
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:56 AM
1

Will there be a video stream of it?
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:18 AM
3

Do you know what this series was called? I want to see what they actually put in it?
/r/MensRights23/02/12 12:48 AM
2

You'll have to a lot, lot more work than the men around you for the same gain, but it is possible, with enough training. It will be a very slow process, unfortunately, as you lack the natural advantage, but it can be done. I've seen several women at the gym I go to who can do far more than me on the weights.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 09:23 PM
1

There's no reason why ytou need to be weaker than the men around you- you just need to work at the gym more than they do. Keep it up and eventually you'll be able to go toe-to-toe with any man.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 08:51 PM
3

To be honest, everyone has a lot to be angry about with the GOP.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 08:48 PM
6

And then they have the nerve to suggest that not enough is being done for women! It's enough to drive you crazy.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:45 PM
14

You're also a troll, and not a very successful one at that.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:40 PM
2

You would have won the suit- labour laws entitle you to toilet breaks.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:36 PM
5

It's a little bit out of line- the fiance may not have a reddit account, and the image of them being a family is far more important to lot's of people than money. Most of your post is good advice though.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:25 PM
3

What actually was the proposed abortion law that's being fought? I'm not from the USA.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 11:15 AM
0

No, we just love some truth.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 11:06 AM
10

If you're daughter had something that horrible done to her, I'm sure you would find it hard to trust anyone. I know I would.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 11:05 AM
4

I'm pretty sure SRS has more straight white men than we do (as a percentage of total subscribers.)
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:21 AM
3

This is a repost, I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:14 AM
2

True, owever the OP's comment that he was banned for "why can't women just be women and men just be men" makes it seem like he was saying that that is the ideal. It also ignores the reality which is that most people don't want to fit into those roles.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:44 PM
1

I'm sorry, I looked at for ten minutes and I still couldn't see past all that hate.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:42 PM
14

We don't need to character assasinate you. You've done an extraordinarily good job of that yourself. Exactly how is ignatiusloyola any of the things you have described?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:18 PM
1

Essentially what I'm saying is that it's fine for boys to go into dance and girls to play hockey, but we shouldn't be surprised when most boys don't want to dance and most girls don't want to play hockey. That's exactly the same as what I'm saying. And what I think the OP is getting at is a very controversial point. That some people desire to remain in traditional gender roles; and those people are treated very negatively as a result. The best example is the "traditional housewife". That role is…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:16 PM
1

By "reak man" I mean the sort of person the OP seems to think is the ideal for a man. And I thought, you were wanting people to stay in gender roles, like the OP. I seemed to misunderstand your position.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:27 PM
4

Then just don't be feminised. Stop complaining that other men don't want to spend all day watching football and hunting.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:24 PM
6

The average man and the average woman are not identical. Their not. Two average men are also not identical. We men don't want to be forced to be "real men" (and i'm guessing women don't want to be "real women" either) so stop trying to force us into those roles. I'm perfectly happy somewhere in the middle of the scale.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:22 PM
0

And breast cancer- for obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 01:54 PM
1

I feel he does, but how can you expect one person (AnnArchist, kloo and pn6 are essentially inactive) to moderate a 30000 subscriber subreddit. He has a life too.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 01:53 PM
16

My vote would be for jeremiahmra Good lord that would be an utterly horrible idea. We'd become r/stormfront in a month. Troll King would be okay, but honestly I think Celda is the best choice.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 01:48 PM
5

No, it's fine up there- I like it when people also post articles relating to other issues. And I've just realised why this is important- MRA's also fight for men to not have to conform to extremely strict gender roles and so this is an example of some of that being forced on people- to conform to standard roles.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 01:34 AM
1

And more impulsive than your average woman.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 01:26 AM
3

Because you want to test out your new subreddit superpowers? Anyway, back to the original question.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 01:26 AM
3

So when are you going to link to one of those shitty little subreddits like manhood academy? You're the first of their ilk i've seen who hasn't linked in every post.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 01:24 AM
4

Although I would hate to critiscise the newest person capable of kicking me out of this subreddit, I have got an issue with this link. I don't see how it is related to men's rights. It's far, far more of a transsexual right's issue.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 01:03 AM
5

Welp, if I cant see the ad, then I dont know what I'm donating to and therefore won't donate.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:02 PM
2

U MAD DUMB BIGOT? LOL
/r/MensRights20/02/12 08:55 PM
8

As it should. It's their womb. The father should have some say, but the ultimate decision must rest with the person carrying it to term.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 05:06 PM
2

I have a very similar stance to you. As to the question: Politics should play a part in some of the debate. While there are a lot of thinks we agree on, a lott of the r/MR people fundamentally disagree on certain matters due to our political leanings. (Me and Demonspawn for example disagree on an enormous number of things.) But there are a lot of areas where it shouldn't. Politics shouldn't affect any discussion on rights whatsoever.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 04:29 PM
1

It did oppress everyone for the benefit of a small minority in power.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 01:32 AM
4

harbinger of warning bro. Yes- a warning that we have another Jeremiah on our hands.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:11 PM
3

the patriarchy has existed for thousands of years. To the detriment of men The patriarchy was a system cunningly set up by a very small minority of men to oppress all other men and win women for themselves- also oppressing them.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:09 PM
6

Ever heard of comedic effect?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:05 PM
25

So that's why they want prostitution banned.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 07:43 PM
6

The fact that he calls every other person a faggot mangina and believes that the right to vote should be given only to certain people makes me think that he is a troll. Demonspawn is someone I vehemently disagree with. Do I think Demonspawn's a troll- no. Because he doesn't call every other person a faggot mangina.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 07:40 PM
7

If you're not an MRA, you're a bigot.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 11:06 AM
0

Marriage was always like that- it's just that the good reason for it being like that has gone away.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 11:02 AM
6

Yeh, but he's probably deterred about 100 people from joining us. To be honest, i think he's just an SRS troll that got smarter, and decided to play the long game.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:52 AM
0

Marriage is not preferable- marriage means that the man will almost certainly lose most of his property if it ends.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:45 AM
2

Good god we need to do something about this problem. We need hundreds of police task forces and guaranteed no-parole life sentences for the perpetrators.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 09:50 AM
3

A birth out of wedlock =/= a single mother. A large number are simply where a couple rejects marriage in favouir of partnership.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 09:43 AM
1

It's not your fault, its the fault of the people who think that male teacher = paedo. You shoulder none of the blame. Good luck with your degree.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 09:37 AM
2

7 billion humans. Is that enough evidence? 200 times the population of the next most populous large animal- which itself has survived for several hundred million years. Humanity isn't going extinct until the planet is completely destroyed- and even then it's not likely for humanity to die out.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 09:36 AM
2

Yes we have. There is absolutely no survival pressure for humanity any more.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 11:23 AM
27

I don't get how someone can see your name and still think that you're a guy. It's obviously a woman's name. And Thank you for advocating for men, and being an MRA.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 09:39 PM
5

Annoyingly that is true.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 05:43 PM
5

Keeping the original for posterity: Okay, here's some background. My friend is pregnant by a really great guy. His situation is shitty, he got my friend pregnant a month after he broke up with his ex. They aren't together, and she didn't push him to acknowledge the baby as his, she gave him the option to opt out. He wants to be a dad. That's where his problem is. He recently found out his ex is pregnant, and has named him as the father. She has told multiple people he is the father. However, she…
/r/MensRights17/02/12 05:39 PM
1

The study says that girls, and boys, tried harder because they thought a male teacher would be more generous.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 05:17 PM
22

This is why we need to encourage more men into the teaching profession- not only does it end the bias against boys, it also encourages girls. All children tried harder under a male teacher.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 10:32 PM
3

I smell a troll.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 09:05 PM
3

[/r/Rights4Men makes manhood academy look non-bigoted.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 05:12 PM
1

Liz Trotta is a vile human being. She has managed to be the most out of touch, misogynistic, misandrist, downright hateful person I have ever seen outside of stormfront.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 04:56 PM
1

To get what SRS is, take the KKK and replace black people with white men. Add in a complete lack of ability to do anything (which is why they are nowhere near as bad.)
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:50 PM
5

Get the fuck out of my reddit and go back to stormfornt.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:48 PM
1

There are only a few good holidays: Christmas (or the equivalent). I celebrate it and I'm an athiest. Presents and turkey, how can you disagree. Birthdays. New Years, and Guy Fawkes night.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:39 PM
3

So a loving gesture and delicious food that she probably woke up much earlier to make isn't good enough? I smell troll.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:37 PM
2

True, but as Jeremiah has attracted roughly 75% of the total downvotes I have ever given out, I just attack him now.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:45 PM
2

You're a troll account.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:27 PM
2

Essentially what happens is someone comes along and makes a post about how they were falsely accused of a rape they didn't commit. We post sympathetic comments. Later the troll changes their post to saying that they raped someone and got away with it. It's all part of an enormous attack on this subreddit by /r/ShitRedditSays, which is an anti-male and generally bigoted circlejerk, famed for quote mining and context-removing.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:25 PM
3

It took just 10 minutes for me to be banned. Think of it as proof that you are intelligent.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 06:42 PM
2

Sorry about that then, I guess I misinterpreted your statement as saying that men are cleverer in general.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:45 PM
2

True, but you must always remember it before you say that say "men are cleverer than women". It's the apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:39 PM
5

The IQs of <30 are also 30:1 men to women. It's al to do with the flattened male bell curve.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:32 PM
1

What's the difference between you and a troll? Fuck-all
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:32 PM
1

Because they get told their whole life about how they should do what they like to do and they'll be bale to make a living at it. Luckily for me, physics and engineering are what I've always wanted to do, along with maths.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:53 PM
1

I will.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:38 PM
5

He called a guy who killed himself after years of homophobic bullying a "whining pussy".
/r/MensRights12/02/12 10:26 AM
2

You still haven't proved your original statement.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 10:21 AM
5

It is up to you to prove your statement. I have bargained with many woman. None of them have screwed me over. Your statement is disproved.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 12:53 AM
1

Ok, I shall take issue with your claim: Lol well that was dumb of him. You never bargain with a woman, they'll screw you over. 1: Victim blaming:) Lol well that was dumb of him. 2: Generalising an entire gender, coupled with misogyny:) You never bargain with a woman, they'll screw you over. I sincerely hope that you're a troll, because if you are not, then you are the most bigoted person I have ever had the displeasure of conversing with.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:53 PM
2

So stopping trolls is trolling now?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:42 PM
2

I wish I had money so I could donate it to this guy's legal fund for his lawsuit.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:33 PM
1

Troll. Downvote, report, and ignore.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:16 PM
0

This is a good idea. When i go on /r/feminism it is because I want to debate feminists and convince them, not because I want to debate MRAs.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:12 PM
1

So you are saying that voting to ignore an entirely unjustified act of war on your own soil is a good thing?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:00 PM
0

I don't give a flying fuck about what some jumped up feminist circlejerkers decide to call themselves. They could change the default name to "Support forced eugenics for all people of Jewish descent" for all I care. I find it funny. I also find gradualnigger funny. IT DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:56 PM
3

I don't think you belong here.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:55 PM
1

Unlucky mate, guess you'll just have to carry a laptop with 3G around.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:52 PM
1

But breasts are also considered just as obscene. My point is that they shouldn't. What newspapers are you referring to? The Sun, the Star, the Sport- all British newspapers containing pictures of breasts and available to anyone for as little as 30p.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:48 PM
2

But the equivalent of a dick is not breasts, but a vagina. We are allowed to put breasts in newspapers, that can be sold to children, so why not go the whole hog and let them walk around with them hanging out.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:36 PM
0

I think we need far more shelters for abused men than we currently have. However, I think making the current women's shelters gender-neutral is not the way to go. For men, and women, who have been repeatedly abused by their partners, exposing them to anything that could remind them is probably a bad idea, at least in the early stage ones.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:34 PM
3

A woman exposing her breasts should be viewed the same way as a man exposing his chest- completely fine.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:25 PM
10

What exactly is wrong with this? All the points seem like fair ones.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:18 PM
21

So, the bad actions of some men, and some women too, should result in the forced mutilation of all male babies, to remind said babies to not engage in adultery etc? Sounds like a good argument to me, sign me up. /s
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:15 PM
4

It's rule of the wealthy instead.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:35 PM
5

And why would that be any better? The only major difference between a republic and a democracy is that a democracy gives everyone suffrage.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:30 PM
5

Very well then. Please explain your system, which happens to be better than democracy.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:28 PM
2

Then what is your perfect system?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:22 PM
2

Democracy is a shitty system. But the others are even shittier.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:19 PM
3

I meant tell me why only some people should have the right to vote.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:09 PM
4

Ok then, tell me why?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:57 PM
2

You have just stated that only some people should have the right to vote. That does not make you a realist, it makes you an idiot.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:21 PM
11

WTF are you on about?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:12 PM
1

Suffrage is an example of a right that should be granted to more men than women. *Congratulations* You are now officially a bigot.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:43 PM
-1

Yes, but you obviously aren't.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:39 PM
1

This is of course a complete mischaracterization of traditionalism designed to disparage it. Then what is traditionalism, if not that?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 03:52 PM
3

So.. what this quote essentially says is that all women are misandrists?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 12:37 PM
1

No, you were banned for calling our most active mod a troll, and a "faggot ass mangina"
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:48 AM
1

If some people do not want to shed gender roles, then they shouldn't have to. But if people want to shed them, then they must be allowed to do so (unlike what Demonspawn is saying) BTW: My country, the UK is set to increase in population by around ten million over the next 5-10 years. :)
/r/MensRights03/02/12 04:46 PM
1

Isn't this the same chancellor who decided to scrap all of Germany's nuclear plants and replace them with coal burning ones? She definitely needs her head checked. It may seem like a problem now, but I think it will follow the example of many of the Black Christian communities. The previous generations tended to be very Christian, however the new generation is almost not at all. The parents may not be assimilated, but their children definitely will.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 09:27 PM
1

If you really think that Muslims will become 50% of the population then you need to get your head checked. Even here in the UK the Muslim population is tiny.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 09:03 PM
1

That argument seems weak considering Germany did allow it's women to work and also had slave labor. Except that Germany didn't allow women to work. The entire point of women for the Nazis, laid out by Hitler himself, was to stay at home, cook, and have children. Also, the slave labour did not make as much of a contribution as you might think- it was extremely inefficient, mainly because the people in the camps often decided to sabotage whatever they were making. Multiculturalism + traditional bi…
/r/MensRights02/02/12 07:48 PM
1

Let me draw comparisons with the Nazis. The main reason, most people agree, that they lost WW2 was because they were outproduced by other countries- namely the ones that allowed women into the workforce. We will not be conquered by some other society, namely for one reason- almost all other societies around the world are becoming slowly westernised.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 07:09 PM
1

I don't think anything whatsoever is still necessary for the survival of the species. There are 7 billion of us. We havn't needed to worry about survival of the species since 8000 BCE We are definitely at a point were we can afford to shed all gender roles and create an equal society
/r/MensRights02/02/12 05:51 PM
3

Exactly why is she dumb? The only dumb person I see around is you.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 05:09 PM
2

Mitt Romney is also enormously wealthy, advocates for the wealthy, and is essentially buying his votes. Newt Gingrich is just as bad. The only Republican candidate with any sense of principle is Ron Paul. EDIT: I don't mean that Ron Paul is a good candidate (I disagree with him on a lot of things), but he is the only one who looks like he will keep his promises.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 11:02 PM
1

But I was referring to a statement that specifically referred only to male-male and female-male rapes.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 10:35 PM
1

I already accounted for that by including envelopment. I base my assumptions on the estimated figure for rapes in prison, which is over 300,000 a year, higher than the total of all other reported rapes.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 09:51 PM
5

There is only one excuse for killing someone, and that is self-defence.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:40 PM
2

However, gay men (and bisexuals) are paticularly at risk. Why this is, I don't know. i'm not saying that he shouldn't give ads targeting all men, but that he should give these ones as well (although to hazard a guess as to why LGBTs have higher rate of STD's I'd say this- in a same sex relationship there's no chance of pregnancy, so the impetus to use condoms isn't as large)
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:36 PM
4

Is the part of the brain that thinks before it reddits not working in you? It is people like you that make the rest of us look bad.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:32 PM
2

Actually, I would much rather be roomed with a male roomate than a female one, simply because we will likely have more in common- we will likely both like to watch the rugby, rather than end up fighting over the remote.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:30 PM
4

I would have loved to help you with the speaking, however there is one problem- I live in the UK. As for the other things, I think one of the most important things is to get petitions. However, when you do go around asking for signatures, don't ask upfront- "would you support our ban on circumcision" - go about it this way instead: You- "Do you think that infant genital mutilation is a bad thing." The stranger has no choice but to say "Yes". You- "Do you think it is right to go around cutting of…
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:27 PM
7

To be fair, in the USA, when you include estimates of prison rape, the majority of rape against men is carried out by other men. However when it isn't included (which it isn't in almost every single study), female-male rapes vastly outnumber male-male rapes.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:19 PM
3

Tom and Jerry is the best children's show (or even just show) ever. OP: It doesn't seem emasculating at all, as the femininely dressed character is obviously an older sibling, and younger siblings almost always followed the older one. Even if it was emasculating, then what is the problem. The whole point of this movement is not to go back to traditional gender roles, but to equalise treatment between men and women both legally and socially.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:14 PM
1

You can't blame them- if they admitted that not everything was a social construct, they'd be out of a job.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:08 PM
2

The only thing you need to do to be an enlightened thinker is be willing to change your opinion based on facts.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 05:47 PM
2

1)Please do not post links to SRS or SRSD, there was a thread started by the mod ignatiusloyola to stop this recently. 2) Please link to the specific comment in question.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 10:19 PM
3

I guess so, but I think that's more of a kinky bedroom thing than an all the time thing. I'm not a masochist myself, so if anyone is could they provide a better idea?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 09:12 PM
1

One little bit of advice: rather than cover false rape accusations, I would spend more time talking about the male victims of rape and how false statistics are used to hide them.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 08:18 PM
5

Sexual molestation: using someone else's genitals without their permission. Infant Circumcision: Cutting off part of someone's genitals without their permission. They seem pretty similar.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 07:58 PM
12

There are guys that would enjoy being abused by their partner?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 07:47 PM
2

It's not good to stay if you don't want to, but it is better to wait a week or two rather than leaving immediately. It will seem less dickish, and you might even realise that you do want to stay with them.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 11:01 PM
3

How is it not cruel? You are leaving someone simply because they could die- through no fault of their own.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 08:32 PM
16

I normally wouldn't be this cruel, but this woman deserves it for leaving him because he had cancer. I would pretend to forgive her and take her to the superbowl, then as soon as we were at the gates I would leave her and meet up with my male friend nearby, and watch it with him.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 07:59 PM
1

True, but it is still in poor taste to act this way this early on.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 07:18 PM
4

Unfortunately, they are, and by the mainstream ones too, which is why I get annoyed when people say that feminism is for equality. I can easily accept the radical feminists are in no way representative of feminists, but it gets harder when mainstream organizations do it. Another example, you know that study a while back that concluded that men made up more than 95% of rapists, and was widely quoted by NOW, and others. But do you know how they got to that figure? They excluded all rapes where a f…
/r/MensRights30/01/12 06:23 PM
5

There is the continual mantra pushed forward of the glass ceiling keeping women from the very top, yet no mention whatsoever of the glass floor, which keeps women out of the bottom, and results in roughly 95% off all unsheltered homeless being male. And the push for the incorporation of the Duluth model by many mainstream feminist organisations such as NOW. This is a model which clearly states on it's website that women only ever commit DV because they are abused by their partners. It says that …
/r/MensRights30/01/12 06:05 PM
1

Your sentiment is Ok, but there is a problem. It is considered extremely poor taste to start saying that maybe the victim wasn't assaulted when they have just reported it. That can be saved until someone is charged or at the trial.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 05:37 PM
8

I like your optimism, however I disagree with it. Adding that word was just to try and fob us off so that they can get their biased viewpoint through without us interfering with all our nasty facts. As soon as VAWA goes through they will go straight back to men bad, women good like they do normally.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 10:58 PM
17

Didn't you hear the news? Only women can be victims of anything. Men and male children don't matter. Or at least that's what my gender studies class taught me. /s
/r/MensRights29/01/12 10:47 PM
13

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 09:07 PM
3

What about... the vagina you fool.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 10:18 AM
3

Any subreddit can invade, as you use hardly any of your members in an invasion. If all of the members were present in an invasion then I would have 100,000 karma by now.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 09:59 PM
2

And how are women systematically oppressed anymore?
/r/MensRights28/01/12 09:57 PM
2

There's one there right now targeting my post in your invasion thread.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 09:24 PM
2

Ok, now I know you're a troll. You are 8 days old and have negative karma.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 09:09 PM
6

Compare with 30 in SRS
/r/MensRights28/01/12 08:59 PM
10

That comment has 0 points. A comment below denouncing it has 23.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 08:43 PM
2

Your members are often more active than ours, so it balances out.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 08:41 PM
5

I never said it was their fault, I said it was the fault of the large feminist lobbying organisations such as NOW which has campaigned for the outright dismissal of male victims of abuse.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 08:40 PM
8

I'm pretty sure you are one of those loud mouths. You said yourself that transmen aren't men.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 08:27 PM
5

True, but I did tell them to go and ask the trans community in r/transphobiaproject, who would have agreed with me.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 08:26 PM
6

Invading an invasion thread eh? This is getting meta.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 08:25 PM
3

So you're saying that 50% of Domestic violence is negligible.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 07:10 PM
5

The people behind the Duluth model believed that- their own website says that women only ever commit acts of violence in self defence against abusive men, and that violence by men against women is ignored and supported by society compared with violence by women against men. The sad thing is that this model is in use by many police forces.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 06:48 PM
0

Have a look at this. IT is a Domestic Violence model, developed and endorsed by mainstream feminist organisations such as NOW, which ignores completely domestic violence committed by women (despite it being the majority) and states that men are never abused.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 05:42 PM
5

Some MRAs do, but they get almost no funding whatsoever from the government. I remember one story about a shelter for battered men opened in Manchester ( I think). There was a women's shelter down the road which received oodles of government money, while the men's shelter was funded almost entirely out of the pocket of it's founder. If feminists want to claim that they are for equality, which they do (often claiming that the MRM is unneeded because Feminism is for equality), then they should ope…
/r/MensRights28/01/12 05:37 PM
6

It's not an industry, but there is a lot of money to be made out of it- both for lawyers, and in terms of government funding. I think many feminist groups think that if we give any funding towards male sufferers, it will take away from female sufferers. Others (including a lot of mainstream ones) simply believe the Duluth model- which states that women never abuse, they only fight back against abuse committed against them. It's used by many police forces across the USA, and is utter misandric bo…
/r/MensRights28/01/12 05:32 PM
8

Children at that age are far too young to be able to form intent to harm or abuse, and far too young to be able to tell what is criminal.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 11:24 AM
0

Eating meat was the enabling factor for our large brains.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:43 AM
1

I think he's being downvoted for being an utter dick and not helping this person with her presentation.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:39 AM
1

Ok, I think I may have gotten the deaths mixed up with homicide victims in the DV cases.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:32 AM
6

I not only think it, it's been statistically proven that 40% of rapists are female, and 50% of victims are male. So, while men rape women more than women rape men, the difference is not that significant- nowhere near what NOW would have you believe. It's also been statistically proven that women commit more child abuse, and more domestic violence (although more damage is done by male perpetrators of domestic- yet surprisingly women commit more spousal murders.) It's not that we think that women …
/r/MensRights28/01/12 12:53 AM
2

Jesus was a socialist.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 10:09 PM
2

Ok. I will add my opinion to the comment once I've seen the video.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 07:49 PM
6

Which is why we need to ban them.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 07:41 PM
1

This sounds like a brilliant theory as to why this effect happens as it also explains why boys do not do as well in subjects such as biology and history where there is far more fact-learning.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 07:40 PM
2

Sent what out to everyone? You haven't linked anything. EDIT: Now that I have seen the video here are my opinions: Pretty one sided, although at leas some of it used gender neutral language. I say send your company back an edited video with the facts for male victims as well.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 07:38 PM
16

But overall, the vast majority of child abuse is committed by women. EDIT: Also sex crime=/=murder.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:19 PM
2

True, in part. Men will (without significant effort to the contrary) always make up the majority of the very top and very bottom of the country.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:55 PM
2

Jesus' actual words: "It is easier for a camel to get through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven." See you in hell Jeremiah.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:50 PM
1

Correction- you are a successful thief.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:48 PM
1

We'll listen to your arguments when you leave your parents basement.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:47 PM
1

Reagan destroyed your country. You couldn't call him a socialist in a million years.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:44 PM
1

I think that you are the one we need to hit with a smart ray. Then again some basic smarts are needed first for the ray to work.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:42 PM
1

True, I have given him so many second chances to stop shouting bullshit that I simply cannot be bothered anymore and now simply downvote every comment I see that he has made.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:40 PM
1

Marx was on the exact, and I mean exact opposite of fascism. Marx was right.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:39 PM
2

All transsexual people either are currently men, were men or plan to be men. Therefore we should fight for their rights too.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:34 PM
1

There are a whole bunch of reasons as to why someone wouldn't go to the police to report a rape. They apply more to men but they also apply to women.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:12 PM
2

Which means that not only is the white knight concept bad for men, it is also derogatory to women- assuming that they must be protected from the real world simply because they're women.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:05 PM
4

In one of her later posts (in her original story), AppleGods makes clear that she did. infact say no, and also pushed him off her repeatedly, before giving in. That's enough to make it rape in my opinion. I, also, at first wasn't on her side, but then I found that comment. However, blaming reddit for jumping to the obvious conclusion when she didn't clarify all the evidence is wrong.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:03 PM
2

Wait. What? I never saw that one. I better go back and look for it. EDIT: Seen her other comments in the thread, and these clarify that she said no, and so it is rape. Sorry about that- when I read it the only ones she had posted indicated that she was drunk, but had consented.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:27 PM
2

I like to take solace in that comment recieving over 400 downvotes.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 11:15 AM
-6

Not any more, thankfully. Now the tables are turned in that thread.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 05:14 PM
5

But there are far more men treated like slaves than there are male billionaires.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 05:13 PM
2

But they are often more disturbing and damaging because of the betrayal of trust involved.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 05:02 PM
1

ignatiusloyola doesn't ban them because he is a decent person who believes in free speech. Also, it is far better to allow them here and then expose their lies than to shut them away and let them preach their nonsense.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 04:58 PM
4

I like to think differently, especially as the offending comment on /r/athiesm was heavily downvoted.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 10:26 PM
5

Have you ever heard of non-combat support roles?
/r/MensRights23/01/12 10:34 PM
1

And being for equality means you need to be for equality all of the time.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 05:50 PM
29

How stupid are you. We are complaining that she (the rapist) is getting far too light a sentence. EDIT: Since you are 1 day old and have -104 karma, I can assume you are a troll. In which case you are successful. Enjoy your downvotes.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 10:32 PM
1

It was horrible for everyone 100 years ago. Do you want to go back to that. I don't. I don't want to go back to a world where I am expected to put work above seeing my children, where I am expected to go off and die in a foreign country for pretty much no reason. I'm an egalitarian because I'm not an idiot. The only way that men and women should be treated differently is that we get separate toilets. EDIT: society not yet ravaged by leftism Let's see what leftism has brought us these past 100 ye…
/r/MensRights21/01/12 12:44 AM
2

Yes, I mean after all, releasing hundreds of murderers and armed robbers out at one is only going to have a beneficial effect on the country.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:51 PM
-1

It's false to assume that men and women should be treated the same If you don't think that men and women should be treated the same, then you can fuck off. Thats what we are fighting for- for men and women to be equal. We are not fighting for a return of the gender role system of the pre-1970s, which was misanthropic and horribly oppressive to everyone- forcing men to work 12 hours a day and never see their children, and forcing women to marry off as soon as they turned 18 into a life of perpetu…
/r/MensRights20/01/12 04:59 PM
3

This story is fake.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 05:19 PM
1

Evil Incarnate. /thread
/r/MensRights17/01/12 03:40 PM
-2

What we need are for the mods to start banning people making hate speech in his subreddit.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:39 PM
-1

He says that women as a whole use children to extract money from men. That's clear as daylight misogyny.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:34 PM
2

Yes. They are made up of carbon, and so will combust. In fact, one kilogram of diamonds will give you more energy that one kilogram of coal if you burn them- though quite why anyone would burn a kilogram of diamonds is beyond me.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:48 PM
3

I guess you are right, in which case a better argument would be that the healthy adults are far more likely to be able to survive without a lifeboat. Of course, the ideal solution would be for the cruise company to behave fucking responsibly and actually bring enough lifeboats for everyone.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:43 PM
6

You will save more years of human life if you save a child. And of course an adult has already had a chance at life whereas a child hasn't been given a chance at all.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 06:29 PM
11

There are almost 7 billion humans on the planet- more than 200 times as many as any other non-domesticated large animal. There is precisely 0% chance of humanity going extinct. Therefore, all these possible concerns about not having enough women for breeding are negated. They may have been realistic concerns in prehistoric times, but not since the dawn of agriculture. Plus, in modern, monogamistic cultures, men have the same ability to breed as women do.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 04:29 PM
4

True, but we're not supposed to be the male version of /r/feminisms. We're supposed to be better than them.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 02:17 PM
7

Water is the ultimate gateway drug. 100% of people who go on to take any other drugs take water first, which is commonly used as an industrial solvent. We need to ban water to save the children. Won't anybody think of the children. /s
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:52 PM
1

I can't remember where the source is, but a study was conducted (I think in Australia), where it was found that mothers made up the majority of perpetrators in all categories of child abuse, except for sexual abuse- where men made the majority. Straight after, the study- which was commissioned by their government- stopped reporting the sex of perpetrators except in sexual abuse cases.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:45 PM
3

What is this correct way then? Please enlighten me.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:23 PM
6

If someone is in trouble- being mugged or attacked etc. a bystander must always step in. Criminals can only commit crimes because nobody tries to stop them.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:20 PM
1

I find that unlikely, when the vast majority of games still have male protagonists.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 05:08 PM
2

The spearhead people may not agree with me, or you, but they are still a lot better than manhood academy. Those are the people that need to be banned from /mr.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 05:03 PM
1

If a woman can pass the same physical tests as the men in the battalion, and is able to be hygienic with only baby wipes, then there is no reason why she shouldn't be allowed in the front line battalions.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 03:29 PM
8

0/10. Trolls need to actually be believable. I'm not even going to supply you with the down-votes you so desperately want.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 10:22 PM
4

Can you stop spamming that fucking subreddit here. It drives me fucking crazy with it's shittiness.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 05:07 PM
22

At first I was like- troll. Then I read the links and was liek- I see what you did there. Well played, OP.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 10:42 PM
-6

While I am normally on the side of the father in child support cases, in this one I am not. Why? Because it is the child herself who is making the claim. Not the parent, but the child. And it is hard to disagree with child support when 100% actually is going to the child.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 10:18 PM
4

I refuse to believe that you are British and call it "soccer". British comedy is better. How could anybody in their right mind think that Two and a Half Men is better than Only Fools and Horses. 3.Back to the OP: It probably has something to do with your average US man realising that marriage is simply a way to extract money from him.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 03:01 PM
1

Only by American standards.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 02:38 PM
1

Universal censorship is a price worth paying to not have to read your nonsense.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 05:46 PM
2

This. It is and extraordinarily interesting piece of research in it's own right, but has little to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 05:42 PM
13

This is reddit, not /b/. Dumbass
/r/MensRights08/01/12 01:48 AM
5

Unfortunately /r/feminisms has 10k supporters. Especially as /r/feminism are the reasonable lot and /r/feminisms are like SRS.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 12:02 AM
0

Yes, unfortunately. That should be the next step towardsa more equal system. My ideal definition would be: Rape is sexual intercourse of all kinds and with all objects (to cover penetration with strapons etc.)with another person without that person, and without reasonable belief that said person (the victim) had consented.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 06:27 PM
3

There is one right that men have and women don't, if I remember correctly. The right to walk in public topless. Other than that, nada.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 11:58 AM
0

That's why you always need to wear a condom. A vagina is still a vagina, no matter what the viewpoint of the person owning it.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 12:33 AM
19

I don't get what this has to do with men's rights, or indeed what point you are trying to make beyond "I am angry because women voted for someone else"
/r/MensRights04/01/12 11:08 PM
2

Some religions practised ritual human sacrifice. Does this mean we should let them do it. NO. MGM is wrong, whether or not it is religious. One thing I find worrying also is the man in the article's belief that the average Netherlands person eats an entire cow every six days.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 10:57 PM
2

We should create our own campaign, that fairly represents all possible perpetrators. We should also do the same for things such as child abuse.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 09:47 PM
5

It's disgusting double standards is what it is. Infant circumcision should be completely banned. (With the obvious exception of medical necessity).
/r/MensRights04/01/12 09:10 PM
2

Firstly, I am extremely sorry about what happened to your sister. Rape is something that nobody should ever experience. I have a sister myself and if something like that happened to her, I would be horrified. Unfortunately there is a serious problem when determining guilt in rape cases- due to the nature of the crime there is often a lack of evidence and it boils town to the victims word against the accuser.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 04:08 PM
7

I don't see what's wrong with this. Anyone should have a right to a divorce. It would be a different matter if he was simply refusing to give her alimony or child support. But he is actually stopping her from divorcing him.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 01:09 PM
13

No, it's their subreddit and we have no power over them. One of our mods asked them to a while back but they refused. It's extremely annoying that they link to us as it makes us look bad by association. Although, I guess we could put a message in our sidebar stating that we aren't affiliated with them.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 01:06 PM
3

For a troll, you are especially stupid. Christianity forbids circumcision.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 01:03 PM
0

Did you actually just mention lifeboats? This isn't 1912 and we're not >on the titanic. Planes still crash. Often into the ocean.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 12:26 PM
4

It's not sexist, because: It doesn't exclude dads. As long as it allows dads to register then I’m fine with it. Te rest is just an argument over naming. And out of the possible names they could have given this scheme, Amazon Mum is probably the best (because all the gender-neutral names are far to long).
/r/MensRights04/01/12 12:16 PM
1

well, if feminists still refer to the time before the female vote as if it was yesterday, then we can refer to a '94 case. 17 years is not that long.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:23 PM
-4

And when I am, I'm called a bad mom for spending all of my time >outside of the home. No, you are called a supermom and recieve universal praise. It happens a lot. Bullshit, and you know it. In the West, yes. But try being a bit less >ethnocentric. However, in Africa, FGM is still illegal, whereas Male Genital Mutilation is UN-endorsed. I'm a law student whose actually been spending a lot of time in >family court. Hate to break it to you, but men don't usually fight for >custody. And when they d…
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:21 PM
1

I posted it in the original question too, but I’ll repost it here. He should get video evidence of the abuse, then go to the police, with the evidence, and a backup copy. There is no excuse for domestic violence.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 12:18 PM
4

Edit: We need a word for "people who value men exclusively for their >utility and deny/disrespect men's humanity". I find "cunts" to be sufficient as a word for this meaning.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 10:32 AM
6

Or maybe, there is another, statistically more likely occurence: this was the latest in a series of abuse by the woman of the man and/or child. Misandry such as yours is not allowed, you are assuming, despite statistical evidence to the contrary, that the man was the abuser, whereas in actual fact it is more likely to be the other way round.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 12:04 AM
3

Then you will unfortunately not be able to have this procedure performed. As it says in the article, in requires testicular stem cells, and possession of these requires testicles.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 11:49 PM
9

Finally, a step in the right direction. Hopefully Finland will eventually ban circumcision altogether, except of course when there is medical necessity. EDIT: But it should be only banned for minors. If an adult wants to cut of part of his own genitals and chooses to do so, then he should be allowed to.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 11:47 PM
49

no, not good for him. we MRAs have been fighting for many years to try and stop women in divorce walking away with half the fortune if they didn't earn that half. if we support men in that same position we will look extremely bad and biased.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 07:19 PM
74

Russell Brand shouldn't get any of the fortune that he didn't earn. Same goes for Katy Perry.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 07:07 PM
0

no. because if you save a child you will on average save around a extra 30-40 years of life compared with saving an adult
/r/MensRights01/01/12 04:57 AM
9

well "faggot" or variations are another one . after all, mens rights means all men, not just heterosexual oh, and btw, your comment has now been downvoted for containing the word "mangina". lol
/r/MensRights01/01/12 04:41 AM
4

what we need is more aggressive mods. don't be afraid to ban people if they use bad language etc- we are supposed to be a civil reddit, not the male version of r/SRS we are a small movement, and we don't have the privilege of being able to dismiss some of the crazier people in our movement as crazies, like the big movements. we need to tackle them at source. the civil rights movements didn't get any big wins until they became civil, and neither will we
/r/MensRights31/12/11 07:17 PM
-1

A far better way of getting off the plane is simply- Children first
/r/MensRights31/12/11 12:19 PM
-6

while i don't like that game, we should leave it alone. after all, it's only a bit of fun- we don't want to turn into the fun police and end up as r/SRS
/r/MensRights30/12/11 06:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter