TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

elmstfreddie Archive

View 1 post and 100 comments by elmstfreddie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sad
/r/MensRights22/07/20 01:51 AM
2

Y'all run in some toxic circles if that behaviour is normal.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 07:56 PM
0

This is some incel shit tbh. You really shouldn't be blaming women as a whole, and instead recognize that you had an abusive girlfriend who has emotionally scarred you. There's plenty of good women out there who won't manipulate you based on feelings or emotions you share with them.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 07:23 PM
4

Swap the column labels and it matches the study.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 07:02 PM
22

Talk to feminists about the hijab and you will immediately find the blind spot / hypocrisy
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:12 AM
20

You have copyright on every photo you take (unless you give up the rights to Instagram or whatever)
/r/MensRights28/07/19 08:03 PM
6

Most of us are fine too. Both genders go through bullshit. It shouldn't be a pissing match
/r/MensRights20/07/19 03:10 PM
1

No, it really doesn't. Y'all are sounding like a bunch of feminists right now.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 05:03 PM
1

It's just a movie.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:16 PM
1

UVic
/r/MensRights15/11/18 04:14 AM
1

This is literally taught in gender studies at university. They teach that the scientific method is patriarchal and therefore flawed/bad. They study "alternative research methods" which are basically to just view everything from an intersectional perspective (aka disregard inconvenient facts).
/r/MensRights14/11/18 07:25 PM
1

#men arena Sounds badass
/r/MensRights30/06/18 10:06 PM
1

Click?
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:41 AM

I disagree, being publicly arrested is still very harmful, regardless of the trial outcome.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 06:04 PM
11

Professional ethics (healthcare or otherwise) are drilled into you during university. Flagrantly violating them is shocking to me. I don't believe in life after death so I don't care what happens to my body. But lots of people do care and it's really important that, for them, healthcare professionals aren't pulling this kind of shit.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:56 AM
12

It's extremely unprofessional and shockingly unethical for people in healthcare. It's an important concept in healthcare ethics that people have the right to decide what happens to their body after death. This is a violation of that ethic.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:45 AM
1

Dictionaries describe how people use words, they do not prescribe meaning to them.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 03:40 PM

You have to be pretty ableist to not consider sign language as speaking. <sup>/s</sup>
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:49 PM

This should not have been a bar graph.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:57 PM
4

People like Trudeau so they are defending him without being critical.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 11:35 AM

I just want left economics without this ultra progressive social crap. NDP had to go and pander to SJWs now too. There's literally no one I want to vote for anymore.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 11:34 AM

I genuinely don't understand why universities have any sort of investigative powers. Sexual assault is illegal and a police matter. University should be compliant in handing over evidence but otherwise I don't understand why they do anything.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 09:50 AM

I don't have the numbers so I'm not sure, but that's not really the important question. Female on boy predation is common enough that if people are concerned about men on girls they should also be concerned about the girls. The point is that the media is continuing the rhetoric that men are all rapists.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:53 PM

I'm not really sure what's going on here.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:42 PM
3

I think it was a rank between padawan and Jedi. I could be remembering totally wrong though, I also played a lot of Warcraft... :P Edit: it went padawan, knight, master (all "Jedi")
/r/MensRights07/01/16 01:55 AM

Paladin was a rank before Jedi in Star Wars Galactic Battlegrounds (a game) IIRC.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 12:54 AM

Defaulting to "no abortion" isn't pro-life. Pro choicers don't want to abort either, but think that the option should be available (I.e. what you said basically). I disagree that you need father's consent though. The baby is a physical part of the woman, and it has a huge impact on her health, so if she wants to abort she should probably be able to. I think the more problematic situation is when the man does not want a baby, the woman does, and he's then strung along for child support.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:46 PM
14

I've heard of men getting female only scholarships (without lying), simply due to women not applying (and often they have to give the money away)
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:52 AM
1

Edge browser is pretty good
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:28 AM

Edge plans to support addons from chrome and firefox
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:27 AM
1

Must be a rapist!
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:45 PM
3

Oh I agree it's hypocritical that they wouldn't support affirmative action for males, I'm just of the opinion we shouldn't have affirmative action at all.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 11:29 PM

I have yet to see why a gender imbalance is a bad thing.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:23 PM
3

Isn't that not the case with kosher salt though? I thought it was "kosher" because it doesn't have anything added (i.e. no iodine or the such). Other kosher foods are expensive because they go through a blessing process, yeah.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 10:30 PM

No. You need consent even if you're in a relationship. Implied consent is consent. The question says "ask". Implied consent is certainly consent, and consent is certainly necessary, but I think the person above was expressing that they disagree you need to ask for consent.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:27 AM
2

They didn't think about it. ;)
/r/MensRights26/01/15 09:24 PM

Another alternative to the wiki page is to read the revision history and discussions... You get to see "both sides" pretty plainly there.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:03 AM

This is why, even though I agree with many aspects of feminism, I don't identify as a feminist. This is why, even though I agree with many aspects of MHRM, I don't identify as an MRA. Unfortunately, not identifying as a feminist tends to make a lot of people automatically assume I'm a shitty person who hates women. :/
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:51 PM
1

IPs are not scary. It's about as scary as knowing your neighbour's address, or knowing that "123 Sesame Street" exists.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 09:35 PM
0

Ugh, stop tainting leftism with these crazies. Lefts are egalitarians, whereas SJW are whatever benefits them most in the situation. To equate the SJW movement with people in favour of equal rights is insulting.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:23 PM

I noticed all the feminist crap was coming from one guy on the site. So I mostly just ignore his articles and enjoy the rest.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:18 PM
8

Where's the feminists fighting for 50/50 gender distribution in coal mines?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:43 PM
3

Ad block it -- you never know when you might accidentally be linked...
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:01 PM
1

Oh.... Like a downvote? I see now :(
/r/MensRights20/05/14 09:32 PM

Which country(s?) have blue stop signs?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:57 PM
1

A year of her salary would pay for all those expenses for her and many others... Also fascism and wealth distribution are quite at odds with each other.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:59 PM
0

Regardless, the article is still insulting/bad. If what you said about India is true, then the article should explain that - instead it says the video is relevant to north Americans as well and that looking at women == rape.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:23 PM

That sounds extremely retarded and offensive.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 06:36 PM

If they're going to be accurate, why not just * - straight
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:09 AM
1

Makes sense. BTW I'm Canadian. Must be a new world thing, heh.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 04:33 PM
0

That's how the terms are defined. In general, conservatives want to bring back old economics I.e. low government control & free market. Liberals want progression, which is generally considered increasing government control and more welfare etc etc. Liberals float around the left and right because they're more economically left than conservatives but not necessarily left. But the general idea is they're in the middle. Maybe liberals are right wing in other parts of the world because they're class…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 04:20 PM
0

Liberals are middle, conservatives are right.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 04:11 PM
2

Negative birthrate? Are Japanese slipping back up into their mothers?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:51 AM
16

Why do you say that like it's a good thing?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 05:41 PM
1

... Irrational anti gun rhetoric? Sometimes I hate this sub Reddit, it's like hanging out with a bunch of " 'MURICANS ".
/r/MensRights14/09/13 07:37 PM
2

To be fair, men are statistically more likely to commit violence against women than women are. I'm sure that the UN Development Fund for Men: Ending Violence Against Men states that being a woman is associated with partner violence! ;) Edit: I see people did not understand that I was being facetious :/
/r/MensRights05/09/13 07:17 AM
1

Of course it does.... O.o universities, nor anyone or anything, can supersede the rights given in the Charter.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:54 PM
2

"When the government has limited an individual's right, there is an onus upon the Crown to show, on the balance of probabilities, firstly, that the limitation was prescribed by law namely, that the law is attuned to the values of accessibility and intelligibility; and secondly, that it is justified in a free and democratic society, which means that it must have a justifiable purpose and must be proportional."
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:45 AM
0

Yes, because we don't have this dandy thing called the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I must have forgotten that only America is free and the rest of us are oppressed. My bad
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:27 AM
2

Not to pull a no-true-Scotsman, but skeptics should all be atheists (since religion is simply an argument that there is a deity, and they have given insufficient evidence). However, skeptics aren't defined by their atheism. Feminism isn't actually really "woo" in the way we would use it AFAIK, but I definitely think that modern feminism is unsubstantiated. The most recent Skeptic magazine features articles about gender differences - mostly discussion about the science of it, and the studies that…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 10:34 PM
1

AFAIK, not hiring someone based on anything other than purely credentials is illegal
/r/MensRights09/08/13 10:27 PM
3

I see uberfacts get posted to Facebook a lot. Frankly, all their facts are garbage - their "science" facts are no better.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:56 PM
2

I'm not entirely convinced that men prefer mechanical things and women prefer social things. I think there's a significant cultural and social conditioning that makes it seem that way. Regardless of whether or not men/women "naturally" prefer a certain type of game though, you're right about action games having a large male demographic and social games having a large female demographic. For that reason, the games are catered to each gender because profit. I'm not arguing that games objectify wom…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 09:03 PM
-1

Capitalism and democracy didn't happen in the middle ages.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 05:23 PM
-20

No, it's because men owned land - first, democracy which required land gave them political power, then capitalism gave them the chance to profit from the land. Since women couldn't own land, they didn't have the same opportunity to acquire political power or grow wealth. The only way women could be seen as less productive is the time loss from maternity; however, this is becoming a moot point since progressive countries provide men with paternity leave equivalent to maternity leave.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:50 AM
5

I know it's legislation here in Canada, I think the States have it too, but I can't be certain.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 03:15 AM
12

Same reason 18+ students can't have sex with their teachers. You can't consent to sex with a person in a position of power (I forget the exact wording, but there is specific legislation for this.)
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:49 AM
1

I await my post to SRS
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:04 PM
12

I make quesadillas in my panini press. No flipping required.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:04 AM
1

I was just being cheeky anyway
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:04 PM

Maybe they're not as beautiful as you might think, maybe you have poor body image
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:44 PM
0

I hope they weren't paid for that survey if that's the case
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:29 PM
0

I hope they weren't paid to do that survey if that's the case
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:29 PM
-5

24400 statistically similar individuals vs 3000 statistically varied individuals. Yes, 24400 is a worse sample in this case
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:44 PM
-6

A lot of the time I like hearing about the issues raised on this subreddit, but then the rest of the time, as a staunch left winger, comments like this just make me shake my head. Welfare does not empower anyone. It's shameful, embarrassing, but entirely necessary and goes to those who absolutely need it to scrape by. "Single childless workers" are not punished; rather people who raise children (that will then go on to contribute to the economy and more) are provided incentives to do so. It's th…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 12:16 PM
-15

This is NOT SRS, man edition. It's a lame joke that 3 people found funny on a site of lots. Just because they thought it was funny does not mean they thought it was remotely true. Get over it and dont post this garbage.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:14 PM
11

I'd hope not, since it's CP
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:57 PM
2

I'd give you a base reading, but your calibration is way to good to need it.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 07:10 PM
20

Age of consent in Canada is 16. Just dont take pictures or else you'll be in possession of child pornography.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:19 PM
1

She has already said that she will ask for child support Fuck her. That's what caused this in the first place!
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:08 PM
5

It's a clueless kid doing something to another clueless kid, no one was a victim here. However, the articles like this do turn the boy into a victim - a victim of media and the law, not the girl.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 09:29 PM
13

Ask her when she's been sexist against men and how you could work together to make the genders more equal. If she refuses to answer, then you have proof she isn't interested in equality
/r/MensRights04/02/13 08:49 AM
31

Yeah I really don't see why OP took this article so seriously.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:29 PM
7

Good email, and thank you.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 02:22 AM
4

Those are just the people conducting the study, I'd be more concerned with contacting the ethics board that approved the study.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:48 AM
8

Relevant quotes: The longer invervention is a resistance program, not a prevention program because only men can prevent sexual assault. The enhanced program includes a fourth unit which focuses on facilitating a stronger positive sexuality from which women may resist sexual coercion by male intimates more successfully. The aim of this project is to reduce a very common form of violence against women, sexual assault, at Canadian universities. At least 1 in 6 women will experience an attempted or …
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:02 AM
9

"cropped it a bit"? the composition was obliterated
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:37 PM
3

Don't worry, I don't think all women are insane, its just a smart precaution to make for if shit does hit the fan. Same reason I have rental insurance!
/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:05 AM

It's not really a strawman in this case, to be honest. Feminism exists because they believe that men have more rights than women, and yet here is a case where a woman clearly has more rights than a man. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:16 PM
6

In my experience, people are very accepting and agreeing when you explain what MR movements are actually about. People hear men's rights and it sounds in the same vain as "white power", since we are still chronologically very close to a period when men primarily controlled the world. Honestly, men's rights is sort of a bad name, since realistically we are just egalitarians who are particularly interested in a group that is under represented when it comes to equalising rights. People also doesn't…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:36 PM

Canadian here. Been to two different universities, and I have literally never heard of this "Federation of Students". They have ZERO influence on what happens in universities anyway, so, zero shits are given.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:07 PM
1

Haha I know! After I posted and re-read I was like "... shit." Now that I am on my computer I should properly edit lol
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:36 PM

Post* not poor. I am on my phone
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:26 PM

Same argument the post complains about sir! Being a feminist doesn't mean anything about you, many people still use that label while being egalitarian. Don't define people how they label themselves! We do see a shift in academia for this sort of thing luckily. Even women's studies is started to be renamed gender studies in a lot of places (since the issue isn't "women" anymore, rather gender related issues for everyone)
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:25 PM
-2

Here's my issue: she wasn't serviced not because it was a men's only establishment, but because of some stupid and sexist religious law. He'd have no problem cutting her hair in that very same establishment if he were any other religion. But this is Canada. He has the rights to believe in that crap and do shit like this because of it*. So... I am morally grounded with the woman but legally and technically am on the barber's side here. *since he is not a public service nor harming himself or othe…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:56 AM
3

They don't auto-upload to Google+ though, you log in and it's like "here's the pictures you took, which do you want to upload?"
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:48 PM

For argument's sake, it's best to assume that the person(s) aren't lying. It's just bad form to be incredulous about something in an argument
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:45 AM

It'd make sense for him to pay more of the bill for being super late, but that is a really stupid expectation, especially for a first date.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:41 AM
1

That's the point, isn't it? We get them to identify with our belief (that their definitions are wrong) so that it's easier to persuade them into changing the definition. To clarify, "we" and "them" doesn't mean men and women.. quite simply the people who wish to change the definition and those who don't.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:41 AM
1

But a lot of rape cases don't use force -- ESPECIALLY against men. Non-physical force doesn't necessarily leave evidence in the same way physical force would. I somewhat agree that going purely on word isn't perfect... but it's the best we got. I'd rather have all/most rape perpetrators go to trial (plus a few "oopsies" who aren't true perpetrators) than to see only physically forced rape go to trial (with room for error in that too.) Quite simply, just make it super duper illegal to falsely cal…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter