TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

elonsbattery Archive

View 1 post and 168 comments by elonsbattery on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
163

Activism/Supportelonsbattery/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:54 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

‘Inappropriate comments’ would be 97% of men and women. It’s meaningless.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:07 PM
25

Sounds right. Why censor it?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:43 AM
46

What’s with censoring words in the title? I would be just guessing what you are trying to say. MarriEd? MessagEd?? MurderEd?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:01 AM
26

The skin loses sensitivity. It’s like fucking with your elbow
/r/MensRights04/07/22 11:02 PM
0

That’s a US idea of healthcare. In most of the world it’s more like being in the public service.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 12:38 AM
7

It’s well known in phycology that women use reputation as a weapon far more than men. Men do bad things too, but being competitive in the workplace is approached very differently between the sexes.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:26 AM
84

I know, man, but don’t think like a victim. It will make you bitter. Rise above it.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 09:28 AM
1

That’s the same thing
/r/MensRights08/06/20 12:54 PM
2

Not a bad tactic if they are outright shaming you but that is rarely the case. Most of the time they will silently judge you. Every man knows that showing emotional weakness repulses people. Even if they say it’s no problem they will start acting cold toward you. If you are dating then there is no way you will get a call back. If you are in a LTR they will put up with it but do it too much and they will resent you. Best to bottle that shit up.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 12:49 PM
4

You really haven’t lived much if you haven’t experienced negative reactions to showing your emotions as a male. It’s not a strawman at all.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 12:43 AM
14

The trick is to be stoic while you are actually upset or going through trauma and then calmly talk about how you felt afterwards. You will avoid the outcomes in this diagram. People will think you are enlightened with emotional intelligence but note you still can’t actually show your feelings in real time or you will be seen as a monster. Society wants men to solve problems, not be crushed by them.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 12:23 AM
1

No- you said offering a discount to women is ok. Offering a discount is illegal too.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 11:41 PM
3

You are being downvoted because that’s still illegal. Gender-based price discrimination is a form of economic discrimination that occurs when one gender is charged a different price than another gender for identical goods or services.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 04:21 AM
2

Kitten chin would be hitting the stupidly positioned PS button.
/r/MGTOW04/05/19 10:41 PM
8

That is a very cheap photographer. Average is $3000, but can easily be triple that.
/r/MGTOW28/04/19 06:10 AM
2

Suppressing is the wrong word. It is regulating or controlling your emotions. Sometime emotions are good warning signals or motivators but sometimes they are distracting or just make things worse. is essential for armed forces, police, doctors and emergency services to do this. It’s also incredibly useful in arguments and stressful situations to regulate emotions. It’s generally a positive to be able to do it successfully. Nobody wants a blubbering mess when the shit hits the fan.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 06:01 AM
9

You have that completely backwards. Male victims of assault by strangers in public make up 70% of assaults - more than double that of women.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:23 AM
3

Women have always had more social power. They were the ones who organised connections between people, eg, marriages. They ruled family life. Look at traditional societies- this is still the case. Women have always had more economic power - look back at advertising from the 1800s. 90% are for women. They have always spent the majority of money.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 11:01 PM
15

Women have always had more social power. They were the ones who organised connections between people, eg, marriages. They ruled family life. Women have always had more economic power - look back at advertising from the 1800s. 90% are for women. They have always spent the majority of money.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 10:59 PM
2

That’s a good point. What’s the wage gap between mothers and women without children?
/r/MGTOW08/09/18 11:54 AM
2

Well a lot of it was at the Paris Ritz. US laws don’t apply there.
/r/MGTOW03/09/18 12:23 PM
5

It’s only illegal in your part of the world. It’s legal in most western countries.
/r/MGTOW03/09/18 02:23 AM
3

The Museum of Broken Relationships is just down the road.
/r/MGTOW25/08/18 11:49 PM
6

I like Bill Burr, but when comedians start doing Airplane bits, you know their world is becoming too insular and the downhill spiral has started.
/r/MGTOW25/08/18 01:39 AM
9

Link one article written by a self described feminist calling to change these things.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 02:53 PM
3

You mustn’t have checked very hard.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 08:47 AM
2

Free speech has never meant speech without consequences.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 10:22 AM
3

Well they did try and ban Peterson from being mentioned in all their classes because he was ‘like Hitler’. Even if it was a private meeting- it was still their policy they tried to enforce through their TAs.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 10:19 AM
3

That Point Break remake was probably the worst movie I’ve seen since Battlefield Earth.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 02:40 PM
20

Lots of generations here. MGTOW are a diverse bunch: It’s true some are angry but most are just happy they have realised they don’t have to buy into marriage - A lot of posts are about dudes relaxing in amazing places. The top post now is a MGHOW in Cayman Island. Like it or not, it’s a worldwide movement that’s only going to grow.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 01:48 PM
11

Every single commercial that has a family the father is portrayed as an idiot.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 12:25 PM
3

Ford already has a massive platform. She has a regular column in one of Australia’s biggest news network, she has a huge social media following and she often appears on panels and other media. Her books are placed at the front of bookshops and are constantly pushed down people’s throats.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 11:13 PM
13

Anyone who tries to have difficult conversations about #metoo is instantly crushed by the mob. Robbins was bringing up the idea that women who accuse men in order to make themselves feel significant is not helping anyone (including themselves). This is just going to lead to good men (who would never assault anyone) to take precautions like not being alone with women unless we deal with the bigger issues.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:01 AM
3

He can’t refuse anyone based on their gender, race or sexual orientation. Look up Canadian human rights commission.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:29 PM
10

Oh, come on, some push back is to be expected. There are plenty of ‘diversity’ hires in engineering and good qualified men have missed out on positions. There are also countless articles and campaigns promoting strong, smart women in STEM. I have teenage sons and they are physiologically effected by all the propaganda. This very project had stories highlighting the number of female engineers. Who cares so long as they can do the job. Enough already. I think people are justified to be angry and t…
/r/MensRights17/03/18 12:36 AM
1

Agreeableness personality trait is about 5% of the disparity. Hours worked and type of job makes up most of it.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 10:18 PM
2

It would be according to hours worked or some other valid reason. Every analysis says the gap is for valid reasons. Men do work more hours than women. Men choose higher paying jobs. Men negotiate more. Men don’t swap pay for flexible hours.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 10:12 PM
3

Most employers do not judge employees by their race or sexual identity. I’m surprised the Huff Post has not been the subject of discrimination lawsuits.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:33 PM
2

Do you really think all people who do the same job are exactly the same? Some are more competent or reliable or work more hours. They should get paid more and discrimination has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:28 PM
3

This is behind a paywall
/r/MensRights12/03/18 08:33 AM
10

That has zero relevance. Hire on merit only. Be colour and gender blind. Anything else is racist and sexist.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 05:35 AM
1

The song ‘I don’t like Mondays’ was written about school shooter, Brenda Spencer.
/r/MGTOW03/03/18 01:29 AM
64

Unfortunately, this scam is old as time. There is one guy in my city who has bought hundreds of suits for that mysterious job interview. Points for being creative: That progress section is genius.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:08 PM
16

A good chance? Bullshit. Probably a hundred million to one that it’s a innocent father and daughter compared to a pedophile grooming a 14 year old. In fact, after an online search there is zero evidence of a pedophile ever booking into a hotel with a girl he is grooming.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:45 AM
2

Where do you draw the line? Should every man with a girl walking down the street be stopped and questioned?
/r/MGTOW19/02/18 07:52 AM
1

Leave a review if you are pissed off.
/r/MGTOW19/02/18 04:59 AM
2

No, this policy is messed up and will cause far more damage that not. Like a pedophile is actually going to book into a hotel with a willing 14 year girl. I would really doubt this has happened anywhere.
/r/MGTOW19/02/18 04:58 AM
6

No he didn’t. He was asked for feedback to a series of ideological meetings He gave feedback in the form of a memo that had completely undisputed scientific facts. Not only that, he went out of his way to suggest ways to structure the workplace e so more women could contribute.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:45 PM
4

Yep. Circumcised: like fucking with your elbow.
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 11:10 AM
7

At least I can argue without ad hominem attacks. I won’t go that low.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 02:52 AM
6

Aggression, competitiveness and protectiveness are bad things now? These traits pretty much built civilisation.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 02:40 AM
1

I think having a stand alone lecture on ‘toxic masculinity’ is a problem. It needs context. Maybe a lecture on ‘gender problems’ that looks at how both excessive feminine or masculine traits can cause issues. Or maybe expanding about why these traits have manifested. For example, being stoic has many advantages, especially in emergency situations. And being aggressive is essential in high powered business, or elite sport.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:15 AM
1

There are thousands of sources for how people lived in the past. Just search anything that hasn’t be ‘revised’ by radical feminists. A really good book is The Year 1000. It studies a calendar year in medieval England.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 08:37 PM
2

Men and women had quite different lives but were about the same on the ‘oppression’ level. Privilege was (and still is) economically driven. Men’s lives were shit in many ways. Massive pressure to work and earn money for the family, dangerous jobs, that produced hard lives and early death. Tough responsibilities in many areas, especially in war time. Women were supported and kept safe as much as possible. Take a history class (one that hasn’t had feminist revision)
/r/MensRights21/01/18 08:07 PM
2

women’s partners were decided for them No. In the West there was a courting process were a man had to win over the woman. The woman then decided. It has been like that for a least a few thousand years and supported by society. In some cultures family elders (usually women) arranged marriages. Men have never decided.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 07:56 PM
2

I wish you could go back 200 years a wander into a typical household - anywhere in the world. Women ruled the house and the way children were raised until about 12, then boys were handed over to the father. Go ask a historian.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 07:49 PM
8

Maybe 200 years ago women were subordinate to men in the world of work but definitely not in deciding if a relationship went ahead or in the domain of child rearing or home life. They absolutely ruled those areas. Also 200 years ago, all purchasing decisions were 80% made by women, just as they are today. They also had substantially more laws to protect them than men did.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 06:28 AM
1

Great, you agree that if you raised a boy as a girl they would still have some male behaviour. Seems like you are waking up. Go read some evolutionary biology books to learn more.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 10:45 PM
2

Right...so your hypothesis is that if you raised a boy as a girl they would 100% behave like one. Forget brain structure, hormones, different expressions of DNA, etc. I’m not sure if you have kids but if you observe them for more than five minutes you will see that females are more concerned with people and relationships while males are more concerned with things. This is outside any social conditioning and is supported by many studies. It is also cross culture and large time periods so, again r…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 10:32 PM
2

Being a sociologist you would know that there have been countless studies that show that gender is inextricably linked to sex outside of socialisation. Babies show a preference for gender specific toys, to mention one. But really, just the pure correlation that nearly all people have the same gender as the sex they were born with should tell you more than ‘it’s a purely social construct’
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:31 PM
2

So, it’s just pure coincidence that 99.9% of people’s identity is the same gender as their sex?
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:22 PM
1

How about we just give everyone an equal opportunity to work in whatever field they want? Why should it matter that men and women prefer different things? The idea of striving for ‘balance’ only damages individuals and society. In Scandinavian countries where opportunity is absolutely maximised there is a bigger disparity of male engineers and female nurses. This proves different genders make different choices when there are zero impediments.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 04:43 AM
6

It’s the accuser’s job to prove guilt. Basic justice.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:36 AM
1

But who is the victim when it’s a false accusation?
/r/MensRights22/12/17 03:10 AM
1

Why is that relevant?
/r/MensRights21/12/17 04:17 AM
1

Statistics can be deceptive. Men are victims of violent crime MANY times that of women. Men are murdered in far greater numbers. There is one small, tiny sub category of crime where women suffer slightly more ‘sexual crimes.’ Ask yourself, why do we concentrate on this?
/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:24 AM
1

Yeah, but every country on earth is a little bit socialist. Public education, police, armed forces, public transport, parks etc are ‘socialist’ ideas. Not to mention, government owned industries work extremely well in some instances. Finland government pretty much own mining and all proceeds go to the people. Singapore government owns a tonne of communications. Capitalism doesn’t work in a completely strict sense, just like communism.
/r/MGTOW09/12/17 07:36 AM
1

This is the exact book you need that will answer all your questions and give you practical advice: No more Mr Nice Guy. It changed my life. I’m happy to talk about it after you have read it.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 08:35 PM
7

Took me a minute. She is lifting her left arm and we are looking at the side of her torso. Her right hand is covering her boob and the lump on the left is her boob/rib cage.
/r/MGTOW06/12/17 11:42 PM
3

White Ribbon is one of the most sexist organisations on the planet. They are incredibly demeaning towards males and are Orwellian with the creepy pledge they want men and boys to make.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 02:30 AM
2

Hey. Pretty much all modern camera technology came from Japan. Much of what we know about DSLRs and video cameras where developed in the 80s and 90s by Canon and Nikon. Most sensor innovations in the last decade have come from Sony.
/r/MGTOW16/11/17 07:38 AM
24

I’m sure you can be a male racist socialist nazi and still go your own way.
/r/MGTOW01/11/17 12:35 PM
1

I don’t know where you live but in Australia private universities get massive amounts of public money and individual students gets a living allowance to study. The government can definitely have a say on how this money is spent.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 10:53 PM
8

you think asking boys to talk about feelings is a bad idea? I've never heard that, care to explain? Not exactly: I think asking boys to talk about feelings in a way women talk about them is a bad idea. There are important differences in male phycology brought about by evolution. We can modify these somewhat with awareness and social expectations but there will still be differences. For example, a healthy man will be aware how he feels and be able to share that with people very close to him (not …
/r/MensRights19/10/17 06:32 AM
10

The whole idea of toxic masculinity is a flawed concept. Maybe it should be called toxic society. About one in five people (more males than women) are more aggressive and less agreeable than the standard. Everyone knows a kid like this. Negative societal influences can exasperate this and cause dysfunctional adults. On the other hand positive societal influences can make these people into incredible brave, fierce and loyal heroes - way beyond the norm. BTW, asking boys and men to act more like w…
/r/MensRights19/10/17 02:34 AM
2

That’s seems completely reasonable. You do something, you are asked to stop and you keep doing it then that’s harassment. That sorts out welcome interactions from unwelcome. That used to be the case but unfortunately, in Australia they changed it to what ‘a reasonable person finds to be a hostile environment’.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:33 PM
2

How about a campaign that emphasises that 99.9% of men have not harassed anybody. #itwasntme
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:23 PM
1

Tertiary education in Europe has a very different philosophy to the US. It is mostly vocational (apprenticeships in trade or technical) and far fewer people go to university. What I was getting at is that university in Sweden and most of Europe is heavily subsidised by the state. Most students are completely debt free when they enter the workforce. It’s not a good idea to have a societies young people burdened by huge debt that makes them risk adverse and barely able to get ahead in life. (And a…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:13 PM
1

I’ve lived in the US and Nordic countries. Both have good points and bad but for the average (and the majority) of people Nordic countries are nicer and relaxed places to live. When you have long holidays, universal education and universal health care, far lower crime, you are way less stressed and closer to your community.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:29 PM
1

Ok. But there is an economic spectrum based on the strength of socialist polices. The world socialism is usually used to define it. European countries are know as socialist democracies. On one side you have the US: relatively low (and very flat) taxes, with low government investment in infrastructure, health, education and social capital (minimal holidays, minimum wage, etc) and on the other side Sweden with relatively high (and steeply progressive) taxes, big investment in government infrastruc…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:25 PM
1

You know nowhere in the world is completely capitalist. The US socially pays for education, police, armed forces, parks, roads, subsides power, water, gas infrastructure, health and a million other things. I don’t think anyone is arguing for full socialism, just tilting to a little more like Sweden.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 11:58 AM
2

Post some links of feminists arguing for these things. I’ve only seen the opposite.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:46 PM
2

Ideas like men have no feelings, that they're abusers, they cannot be assaulted, are all tied with the patriarchy and the social construct that exists with it. No. These are purely feminist ideas born from gender studies courses. Ask yourself, who told these lies to you?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:33 PM
1

Social libertarian and economic left are the dominant values of most people I know. It’s more common than you think. Countries that lean towards this are the nicest places to live in the world. Eg. Most of Western Europe, Australia.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 02:55 AM
2

Cleanliness is the (false) modern justification but it was originally promoted in the States to limit sexual behaviour. Watch this Adam Ruins Everything.. They use a lot of humour but the producers pride themselves on doing a lot of research and being factual. There are many other sources. Search it up yourself.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 05:57 AM
17

Plenty of female circumcision is only the clitorial hood - exactly the same as male circumcision. And male circumcision definitely has a negative effect on sensitivity. It was originally introduced to limit sexual pleasure. Both are barbaric and should only be performed on consenting adults.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:48 AM
5

I don’t understand the super issue. •If women want more super then they can work more. •If they want to take time off to have kids and their partner works then they can share their partners super. •If they divorce they get half of their partners super. They only really loose if they don’t work and they don’t have a partner that works, but that’s the same for men.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 01:44 PM
41

Your concern is misplaced. Kids get sick and parents look after them. This photo is life affirming and beautiful. A tired father finding some comfort for his child in the running water. Both parents have agreed to share this moment and make a personal connection with others. Artists do this to give something to the world and we are better for it. Check out the work of Sally Mann for similar intense and emotional images about family. The faces are hidden and the child is too young to be recognise…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 01:28 PM
6

There is no evidence that men don’t advocate for women. In fact there is plenty of evidence the opposite is true. From an evolutionary biology perspective it makes sense that men support and help women as much as possible because their genes will be carried by them just as much as they are by other men. It’s a false argument.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 04:26 AM
1

They are asking for submissions. This is a great opportunity to push for 50% custody by default.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 07:21 AM
5

This is not normal academia. This is gender studies - the lowest ranking faculty when it comes to repeatable studies or legitimate research. They should all be shut down.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 07:17 AM
7

Yes, but not in SEALS. These are literally the top 0.0001% of men. The fittest woman in the world would not beat the weakest.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 04:43 AM
10

Evolutionary psychology or behavioural science is very rigorous. Studies have to be repeated successfully with multiple data sets before they are accepted. It more biology/statistics/math than sociology. To say is a incredibly soft science Is not at all accurate. Don’t let the word psychology throw you: it’s a usually a different faculty.
/r/MGTOW12/08/17 01:27 AM
6

Ford is at heart a shock-jock. She manufactures outrage based on classic 3rd wave feminist ideas of eternal female victimhood and toxic masculinity. A typical article is: mention a few random hideous crimes that some men have committed in the most extreme detail for maximum emotional response, then extrapolate this out to all men have the potential of this bad behaviour. She has caused considerable harm but her fans lap it up. Lately she has been writing some more personal stories, probably beca…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 09:01 AM
0

White Knight makes a move.
/r/MGTOW28/07/17 08:27 AM
1

It will be much, much less than 1000 years. Most experts say we will have sentient AI around 2050. Makes sense: it was only 60 years from the Wright brothers to landing on the moon.
/r/MGTOW14/07/17 03:00 PM
48

Counter sue for sexual harassment. She was in your bathroom.
/r/MGTOW07/07/17 03:20 PM
3

What’s your definition of rape?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:59 PM
3

It's on iTunes everywhere in the world.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 01:13 PM
1

Ask yourself would it be ok if the cinema had a 'whites only' screening. Got an answer? Great. Then ask yourself why you think women not wanting to share a public place with men is any different.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:30 AM
1

Watch some Gad Saad videos.
/r/MGTOW07/06/17 01:48 AM
3

There is a well understood 'dominance hierarchy' with males. It is ranked by influence, wealth, courage, strength. It's what hero stories are based on. Women have selected males at the top of the hierarchy since the beginning of time.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 09:31 PM
2

The hero in mythology is the story of the male. Men have to climb the social hierarchy in order to be chosen by a mate. 60 million years of evolution has created stories about this: defeat the dragon, collect the gold and save the virgin. It's deeply ingrained in the human psyche. Women have their own stories but being the hero is not one of them. That's why there has been more men than women in hero based movies, and is why, when women act like men in these movies, it doesn't feel right.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:42 PM
1

You need to listen to some Jordan Peterson to understand how damaging post modernism is to the individual. Start with his latest appearance on Joe Rogan.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 01:57 PM
6

Yes, thanks for the clarification. I meant a diamond engagement ring. They also introduced the idea it had to cost two months salary.
/r/MGTOW20/05/17 11:36 AM
8

More De Beers than Hollywood. They have run advertising campaigns for 100 years. Diamonds are forever, etc. They invented the idea of an engagement ring.
/r/MGTOW20/05/17 09:12 AM
9

I know op wasn't taking photos but if he was it shouldn't matter. Some of the most famous and moving photos of all time are of kids playing. Like this one. If Leonard Freed tried to to take this today he would have been harassed. So sad it's been sexualised
/r/MensRights22/04/17 12:35 AM
7

I like this guy but he needs to put his seatbelt on.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 10:44 AM
2

Minimum wage for a casual harvest fruit picking is $22.13 in Australia
/r/MensRights06/04/17 01:41 PM
1

Is this really what it's come to? People at my work give a friendly touch on the arm all the time. It's a human thing to do.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 06:26 AM
5

Have you heard him speak about religion? I'm a fairly militant atheist and have some distain for people who haven't thought through their beliefs but this guy has intensely analysed himself. He takes good lessons from his religious upbringing to live his life. He speaks eloquently about the symbolism of the old stories and how they represent human behavioural archetypes. He is not the usual close-minded Christian conservative.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:23 AM
2

Watch Jordan Peterson talk about Marxism. The core concepts of putting people into groups is fairly poisonous If you haven't seen a Joe Rogan podcast before, be prepared to put in a good three hours (totally worth it). Audio only is an option. My philosophy is basically Star Trek. Look after people's basic needs and let them fulfil their potential.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:43 AM
3

Because as the penile gland desensitises, it's like fucking with your elbow.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 06:37 AM
1

They also named the accused. What happened to UN article 11: innocent before proven guilty?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:49 PM
1

It's a little more complex than that. There are Jewish ties to Jerusalem that predate Palestinians by a few thousand years.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 10:48 AM
1

You are snarky, aren't you. I just read the history of high heels and it's very interesting. First ancient Egypt, then European renascence and then the French court. With the latter two it was royalty only but always both men and women. I can find nothing that said men wore them first. It still supports my premise that clothes and make-up are born from sexual selection. Men wore high heels to look taller and more powerful and women wear them now to emphasise curves.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 09:44 AM
1

Sure. I find evolutionary biology really interesting. High Heels Men prefer curves Clothing represents sexual interest Make up lipstick represents aroused genitals with links to studies Hair length - has some interesting points on long hair being a disadvantage in combat
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:36 PM
2

Clothing and make-up is mostly sexual. Men are attracted to curves: High heel shoes and tight clothes accentuate this. Dresses offer easier access to genitals. Lips and eyes go darker when women are sexually aroused, hence lipstick and eye shadow. Some of it is cultural, but a lot is an attempt to increase super stimulus. Hair length is interesting because it has changed a lot over time and I would agree is mostly cultural, although short hair usually symbolises you are practical and physical, i…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:08 AM
2

I could support this if it was paid to all employees who took time off work or worked part time, regardless of gender. To pay it only to women, who decide to work less is pure discrimination. So now I have to boycott Vodafone and ANZ!
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:06 AM
1

I'm not sure what you are reading but there is overwhelming consensus in the scientific community of man-made climate change. It's actually a fairly easily proved concept: any high school student can fill a bottle with c02 and watch it absorb heat. The only disagreement amongst scientists is how much , how fast and what are the consequences. I still think you are trolling so I'm out. Do some reading.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:57 AM
8

Not sure if trolling. If not, you are seriously deluded.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:39 AM
1

Yeah, no. Climate change will effect built up areas with sea rising and bush fires, etc, but wilderness areas will be hardly change: they might even benefit from higher temperatures and CO2. I have been to places in Australia that are absolutely ancient and pristine: climate change will be a tiny blimp in the scheme of things.
/r/MGTOW28/02/17 01:06 AM
1

There was never a garden of Eden. It was a hard life. Technology has given people long, healthy lives, with opportunities to do whatever they wish. Maybe you just live in a shitty place with no universal health care crap services? And seriously, there are plenty places like you describe: In Australia there are thousands of locations that are extremely remote, untouched by pollution. The Primitive Technology Guy is in far north Queensland
/r/MGTOW27/02/17 11:13 PM
4

Before technology you had to constantly struggle for basic food and shelter, you had no recourse against disease and injury and you were likely to die young. If you really want, there are plenty of places in the world where you can live without technology.
/r/MGTOW27/02/17 03:31 AM
3

It depends on what social science you are talking about: History, anthropology, linguistics, criminology, etc are very thorough, mostly follow the scientific method and investigate hypothesis from many different directions. If it's 'gender studies' then it's absolutely politicised and it very much rejects the hard science of evolutionary and cognitive scientists. This has been shown over and over again. I'm surprised they are allowed to maintain a presence in universities with the total lack of …
/r/MensRights14/02/17 01:08 PM
3

I think most male spaces encourage debate so don't hold back, but be prepared for strong rebuttals. You have it backwards. It may appear that society chooses what 'constitutes what is a man or a woman' but in reality it's down to individuals to behave masculine or feminine and to make gender-specific life choices. This has influenced 'social norms' and social expectations might partially influence people's behaviour but mostly people do what they want - especially today. It's no coincidence that…
/r/MGTOW10/02/17 06:58 AM
3

Your definition is not accepted by most people and it's not backed up by science. It is taught in the little bubble of gender studies classes. Sex is what you are born as and gender is the 'state of being male or female'. Gender may be fluid but is incredibly influenced by your sex.
/r/MGTOW10/02/17 06:39 AM
4

You sound so sure of yourself but this is hotly contended in academia. The vast majority of evolutionary biologists and cognitive scientists reject 'gender is a social construct'. And would say all evidence points to gender being partially a social construct and mostly genetic disposition. Watch this video by Steven Pinker. It is really only gender studies departments pushing this idea that the choices we make as males or females are 100% socially constructed. There is very little evidence of th…
/r/MGTOW10/02/17 06:31 AM
5

That's just a whole other indoctrination into crazy.
/r/MGTOW10/02/17 05:53 AM
1

In my first decade at work (in Australia) I received a magical thing called 'leave loading'. It was an extra 18% pay when you took holidays to account for extra expenses that you have.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 11:50 PM
1

You will need to more than that to sell a book. What are the main points? What do men not understand about women?Perhaps post the first chapter.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:09 AM
4

I lean to the left and I support men's rights. I have lived in a lot of countries and where there is universal healthcare, decent holidays and minimum wage and some transfer of wealth from corporations to the people are just better places to live - you are happier, stress free and there is a better sense of community. A lower Gini coefficient means a more liveable country. The left is always striving for a better world and I find that attractive. Feminism used to be part of that ideal, but as we…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 09:36 AM
8

You need to do a bit more research. Men usually go to war because of social pressure (mostly from women). Read about the suffragettes white feather campaign.. Talk to anyone from a country with male-only compulsory military service: you are a coward in the eyes of women if you try and get out of it. Women often want men to protect them.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 10:46 AM
1

Hi medical student. You would know that our brains have evolved these higher functions fairly recently and consist mostly of the frontal cortex. We share a large part of our brains with other mammals and the very old parts we share with all animals and reptiles. You may think that we make every decision rationally and with thought, but an MIT study suggests that over 40% of decisions are unconscious I mentioned in a earlier comment about advertising, which I know a bit about. To sell a product s…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 09:23 AM
1

most behaviour is learned Well, now we are on to nature vs nurture which is a lively debate. The sociologists had the upper hand for a while but now the geneticists have overtaken them. I'd say it 60% nature and 40% nurture by the latest thinking. you think "animal behavior" is responsible for gender roles, you're half a step away from suggesting bad things happen because of the devil. It's faith based bullshit. Are you scared to admit we are just smart apes? The entire field of Evolutionary Psy…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 05:51 AM
9

You know what's embarrassing? Thinking that Gender Studies is actual science. Do you know how many thousands of papers look at lower brain 'animal' behaviour in humans? Ever heard of flight or fight? Ever wondered how advertising works? Ever wondered why we crave sugar or fat? Ever wondered where motivation comes from? Ever wondered what they teach in an economics major? (hint: nearly all behaviour is based on instinct/emotion)
/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:43 AM
5

Employment is not a behaviour. Use actual science not gender studies dogma. And behaviours and roles are very entwined. If I behave nurturing my role is a nurturer. If I am generous with resources my role is a provider.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:26 AM
5

Ok, you seem fairly set in your thinking but consider this: Do you think the gender role of a male lion as head of its pride, is socially constructed? Or the completely different role played by female lions? Note: if you are a male lion and not head of the pride then you are doomed to wander the prairie with your bros. Or the different gender roles played by any animal? Are humans not animals?
/r/MensRights01/01/17 12:40 AM
8

Ha. Did you miss the bit where literally everything I wrote was about gender roles?
/r/MensRights31/12/16 11:54 PM
10

Gender roles are partially a social construct but very firmly based on biology. Have you ever watched small kids play? Boys will compete/construct/problem solve, girls will build relationships/fantasise. This will also happen in families where a conscious effort is made not to assume gender roles. Men and women have different brain function. Men and women have different mating strategies based on biology. Men and women have different hormones that effect behaviour. Men and women have different p…
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:35 PM
2

science backs you up
/r/MGTOW28/12/16 03:52 AM
0

Some stereotypes are true. Women are better at breast feeding, men are physically stronger.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 12:00 PM
1

If you specialise in helping men going through relationship problems, custody battles, dealing with the stress of being a man in society, etc then an understanding the issues is important. Having your eyes open is what psychology is all about.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 11:15 AM
1

Psychologists that specialise in men's issues are increasingly popular and are highly sought after. You will be fine. In fact, if you became an expert in treating 'nice guys' you would have a waiting list out of this world.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 11:00 AM
4

It's currently cinema realise only. It will be available for digital download early next year. If you want to watch it now, organise a screening in your town.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 09:40 PM
10

The movie was named before TRP was a thing. It's been in production for a few years.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:25 PM
13

It might be good to voice your disappointment with Palace Cinemas
/r/MensRights25/10/16 05:54 AM
10

The top comment says the movie has been pulled from the cinema. Is this true?
/r/MensRights25/10/16 03:05 AM
1

I read the comments and I'm completely disheartened by how much these people want to demonise a documentary about the problems men and boys face. There are thousands of them (many from men) spitting vitriol and misinformation. It seems we have an incredible uphill battle. Man, it's depressing.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 10:12 AM
1

Have you ever seen kids playing? It's very different for each gender: boys will problem solve and compete, girls will explore relationships and collaborate. These are not better or worse than each other but they build completely different skill sets.
/r/MGTOW18/10/16 01:13 AM
3

NEVER is a strong word. A lot of jobs from last century have been automated by software. One example from my own experience is that I used to work in a team of thirty people that processed images to make them look good in a magazine. That is entirely done by one guy now that uses an automated process. Cheap, programmable robots will take over most manufacturing jobs over the next decade, there is no doubt.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:59 AM
10

There you go. You have done gender studies. It will take a lot to de-brainwash you. Perhaps start with The Red Pill documentary.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:48 AM
6

I think one of the fundamental flaws of feminism is that men are seen as oppressors and women as victims. This has never been true: men and women have both been privileged and suffered together. The MRM does not have this baggage.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:45 AM
6

You seem heavily indoctrinated. Did you do gender studies? If you want to learn something, why not ask some of the men here how they are marginalised by society?
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:38 AM
3

That's some twisted logic. Women act like children because of men?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 09:14 PM
5

http://fuse.education.vic.gov.au/ResourcePackage/ByPin?pin=2JZX4R
/r/MensRights16/10/16 07:21 PM
2

I'd like to write a companion guide to this program. It would contain statistics and citations disputing much of this propaganda. Students and teachers could download it and use it in conjunction with the official one. PM if you want to help.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 11:56 AM
2

The only businesses sense I can see is the free publicity: this may attract certain men-hating women. They would have to weigh this up with loosing all male customers and female customers who think this is bigoted. They would also loose female customers who are being bought something by a male (fathers, husbands, boyfriends, etc). It's nothing like a bar. Free drinks to encourage women to come and create an environment appealing to men is very different than a quick purchase from a pharmacy. I d…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:35 AM
2

That's just weird. Why would the they want to loose half (or more) of their customers? It's not like creating a women only environment would create more sales. Should I even try and understand the businesses logic?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:20 AM
5

Going by the trailer it looks good. I really like documentaries so maybe I'm biased but exploring men's rights from a neutral point of view can only be a good thing. BTW, the Australian premier in Melbourne only has a few tickets left so suck on that Berkeley.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 08:01 AM
3

A reasonable person would not find this offensive and he wasn't told to stop and then he repeated the behaviour - therefore it does in no way fit the definition of sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 12:33 PM
3

Have trouble with metaphors?
/r/MGTOW02/10/16 12:29 PM
1

It's named after the scene in the Matrix where Neo takes the Red Pill and realises the world it not at it seems. It's a popular cultural reference that has been used by many people for over twenty years. r/theredpill only exists in the small Reddit bubble and is a late-comer to the name. The general population who see this documentary have no idea of the connection to a small corner of a website. The Doc makers certainly didn't when they started. This maybe hard to fathom if you spend a lot of t…
/r/MensRights26/09/16 11:03 PM
4

This thread is about a documentary called the Red Pill. Absolutely nothing to do with r/theredpill
/r/MensRights26/09/16 11:32 AM
2

Young kids were raised by their mothers, but as soon as a boy was a young teenager (12-13) he started work, either as an apprentice, a farm hand or general labourer. This was with 100% men (and mostly with their fathers). This only stopped in the 1940-50's when most teenagers started going to high school.
/r/MGTOW26/09/16 08:44 AM
7

You are talking about a brief period in the 1950-60's. For the vast majority of human history boys were initiated at 12-13 years old and spent ALL the time after that with their fathers.
/r/MGTOW26/09/16 07:46 AM
6

How is this relevant to The Red Pill documentary?
/r/MensRights26/09/16 05:13 AM
2

I could organise at least 10, probably more. At the Nova?
/r/MensRights28/08/16 12:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter