TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

emberfly Archive

View 4 posts and 204 comments by emberfly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is harmful, even if it is applied equally to men. There is a reason statutory rape laws exist. You cannot consent to someone who has power and authority over you, as there is always an element of threat of repercussion if you say no.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 08:55 PM
3

Social studies: the study of things we already know.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 08:52 PM
11

Fake news. Be highly skeptical of the things you see on Tumblr. There are countless Poes and trolls who post things like this to rile people (you, apparently) up.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 08:51 PM
15

I completely agree - I said the same thing in a comment elsewhere on this page. It's way too high. It's a higher sentence than a murderer would get. It's obscene.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 08:39 PM
3

I wonder how many are failing intentionally so they can take the cushy non-combat jobs?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:36 PM
2

No one keeps tabs on homeless people.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:32 PM
1

It's not that there would be many new volunteers (I'm sure there would be some), but it's that NK is so tiny that we already have more than enough troops to defeat them. Moreover, if it's a nuclear war, 0 troops will be needed, because everyone on Earth will die.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:24 PM
-1

A draft for 2 years of garbage collector duties would not bother men speak for yourself. Since it won't bother you, I'll let you serve my time.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:17 PM
2

They pay trash wages for the education and training required and the fact people erroneously believe they make a ton of money allows them to hire a constant stream of new pilots to replace the ones that leave after finding out it was a lie. You seem to be under the false assumption that workers don't find out their pay until after they do the work. That's obviously absurd and the complete opposite of how the labor force works.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:15 PM
17

Please stop giving her free traffic.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:13 PM
24

even though she should probably go to jail for lying about it in the first place She should 100% go to jail for it. Release the people committing non-violent drug offenses and replace them with the people who are ruining other people's lives.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:10 PM
17

I mean at least its stupidity on her part rather than malice. Doesn't matter much to the guy in jail for 15 years tho. Who spent 15 years in jail? The article said he spent 28 years in jail, out of a total of 48 that he was sentenced to.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:07 PM
24

48 years for the crimes he was accused of is cruel and unusual punishment. Why is rape punished worse than murder? It makes no sense.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:02 PM
0

abscheulich unwahr.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:05 PM
1

This is old news. It wasn't "just started."
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:13 PM
1

How many times is this going to be posted here? Do we have to see this every week?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:11 PM
2

Not sure what country you're from, but in the US it is not normal restaurant etiquette. I eat out a LOT, and how it always happens is the waiter/waitress looks around and tries to lock eyes with someone, which signals to the waiter/waitress that that person is ready to order, and then they do, and then it just moves around the circle from there, or on to the next person who makes eye contact and speaks up.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:08 PM
11

That's not even remotely the definition of sexism.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:03 PM
5

"I emotionally abused and alienated my sons in the name of feminism, and now one of them hates me. Please feel sorry for me."
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:46 PM
2

You're punishing the wound rather than what caused the wound. It's so ass-backwards.
/r/PussyPass07/07/17 02:00 PM
3

I don't even understand why consuming it is a crime at all. Creating it? Clear victim. Sharing it? Clear victim. Consuming it? No victim at all. Why do we punish victimless crimes so severely? I would advocate for her receiving no punishment for viewing it, but the article says she was sharing it via a filesharing software, which should be punished.
/r/PussyPass07/07/17 02:44 AM
2

He is so sexy. Really disturbing that they did that though.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:36 AM
2

I agree with you 100%. Thank you for calling out their bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 03:39 AM
8

15/16 year olds are not prepubescent; 16 is the legal age of consent in many US states, and in many countries. Your use of the word pedophile is completely unjustified.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 03:33 AM
-1

I agree, that's not sexual assault -- it's rape.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:56 PM
2

It is in every company's best interest to maximize its profits. Price discrimination is as old as money itself, and it is very legal. In fact, the government does it too. These companies have realized that their female customers are willing to pay more money for goods than their male customers are, and so they have priced them accordingly to maximize profits. Simple as that. If women would be smarter with their money like the male customers are, their goods would be price the same as the men's.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:52 PM
1

In case you didn't know, male fragility is, basically, "men are so afraid of being like women that they'll make neutral things masculine in order to reaffirm their masculinity. That is NOT male fragility. That is fragile masculinity. You're getting your third-wave feminist terms mixed up.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:45 PM
2

Often people who are offended by the word ignorant, are stupid.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:38 PM
2

because "lol it's just men"
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:37 PM
0

I agree with her - there is nothing inherently special about either parent that makes you need them. As long as you have a parent (or two) who are great, you're golden. You don't need a parent with a certain genitalia to turn out all right.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:46 AM
1

Yes. It's not terrifying.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:42 AM
1

No, the dashcam video shows the officer screeching for the guy to stop reaching for the gun, but we can't see inside the car. Where is the video? All I can find on YouTube is the wife's (girlfriend's?) livestream after he was already shot.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:32 PM
1

Yes, actually, inequalities ARE bad. It's not inequality they're complaining about, it's EQUALITY! That's why the article is so disturbing.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:27 PM
3

I've had about 50/50 mix when it comes to my professors. By that I mean 50/50 male/female. I've never gotten less than an A for a class I worked hard in. Some I even got A's in without working hard at all.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:25 PM
0

It was voluntary, and with her being found guilty of lying about the accusation, it is unlikely the school would kick out two proven innocent students, especially athletes.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:23 PM
5

Any kind of spreading in general is only an issue if there is someone trying to sit in the seat(s) next to the spreader. If there is no one sitting in the seat(s) nearby and no one trying to gain access to the seat(s), spreading is a non-issue.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:29 AM
8

Here is the disturbing article if you want to participate in the comments section of it: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3573927/Agony-50-50-mum-Women-held-upper-hand-custody-battles-fathers-winning-EQUAL-access-mothers-struggling-cope.html
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:00 PM
2

They weren't kicked out of school. They withdrew from school before the disciplinary hearing came up because they were afraid that they might be kicked out.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:30 PM
3

“She admitted that she made up the allegation of sexual assault against (the football players) because it was the first thing that came to mind and she didn’t want to lose (another male student) as a friend and potential boyfriend,” the affidavit states. Extremely lucky that she admitted it. Had she not, they would not have had enough evidence to convict, and worse: the two men might be in prison instead of her.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:21 PM
7

I know, I'm in the US. No action I can take will matter since they don't serve me anyway.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:16 PM
34

I honestly believe that self proclaimed feminists need the same kind of wake up call that my mom had. That's unfortunate. That means hundreds of millions of more men screwed over by the legal system before any change happens. If they see someone they know to be a good person, good father, etc. get fucked over by family court; it just may begin to change their minds. That's worrisome.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:14 PM
2

Very good rebuttal.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:10 PM
3

It's the casual upvoter that's propping this up. I hate these people so much. When people upvote based on titles and don't even look at the content. Ugh. They upvote some of the most egregious things, and accidentally upvote things that are actually good. They don't even know the difference because they never bother to check before upvoting.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:08 PM
1

I was thinking that too.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:59 PM
3

Don't get your hopes up too high. While there are definitely loads of reasonable people here, there are also misogynists here.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:59 PM
1

Agree 10000%
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:56 PM
1

That's so cute - I love it!
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:53 PM
1

Isn't this exactly the kind of thing modern feminism should be enraged about? It stereotypes women as nothing more than mothers. Yes, exactly, which is why the majority of feminists, especially the radical ones, ARE enraged about this.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:52 PM
7

To be fair, this is a feminist issue -- feminists completely support changing tables in men's restrooms since men's restrooms without changing tables support their narrative that the patriarchy is trying to force women into motherly roles. And they believe men should have to step up and change baby diapers too (which is true and I fully agree with -- men should change diapers too). So that's why you see them everywhere -- feminist lobbying gets shit done. And this just so happens to fit in with …
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:46 PM
7

Yeah it was pretty fucking rude and condescending. "Oh no, what if that father and his kid see women washing their hands?! The horror!"
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:41 PM
2

You asked why they don't report it, and I told you. Whether you think the reasons are stupid or not is irrelevant; they are the biggest reasons that rapes do not go reported by women, and it matters because it affects the statistics. Reason 1 is the victim's fault, so I don't see how that's a legitimate reason. "Well, he fucked me in the ass after I told him to stop and I was crying from pain, and despite being emotionally scarred, I just feel like y'know, maybe I shouldn't tell the police becau…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 09:33 PM
1

stop
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:48 PM
–

Here is the original video (directly from Rubin Report) for those interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0PTjLnXmCs
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:47 PM
3

He might have uploaded it onto his own channel and is trying to get views for content he didn't create. It says video uploaded June 7th, 2017, the day before the OP was made.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:46 PM
7

See also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKFHZuCvvS4
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:39 PM
2

Rape is not always traumatic. And yes, victims absolutely can care about their rapists, as well as the people who would be negatively impacted if the rapist got in trouble/sent away to jail for a long time.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:38 PM
5

I checked google, and actually it is not recognized as a typo (maybe you spelled it wrong?). Also checked bing -- also not a typo there.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:48 PM
2

Yes, I already know everything you're saying. As for why women don't come forward, there are obviously infinitely many reasons, but the most common ones are They don't want to get the rapist in trouble. Sometimes the rapist is their friend, their friend's friend, their boyfriend, their husband, the father of their kids, and they know how devastating it would be for him if she accused him of rape. And often they choose simply to let it go and not come forward about it. They feel hopeless about la…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:38 PM
1

I see 0 issue with traditional gender roles. If they make you happy, go for it. I think they are stupid as fuck though, and I would never be attracted to a woman who was traditional and domestic.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:36 PM
1

penis Yes please. My inbox is ready.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:34 PM
20

Because teh evil wimenz lie!!1
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:29 PM
2

Ultimately, however, it should not be about who has it worse. It should be about understanding the actual rate of violence for each group and accurately reporting it so as to help those victims. Yes, I totally agree. I think the whole point, however, about finding out if men are raped more is to seriously illustrate how neglected men are by society -- "they are the majority of rape victims" (purportedly), yet they receive no services to cope with this the way that women do, they are spoken about…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:18 PM
0

Actually she is charged with involuntary manslaughter on the basis that she told her boyfriend to kill himself, and he did. Which is exactly my point. She won't be convicted, since she didn't actually commit involuntary manslaughter, as per definition of involuntary manslaughter. They should have charged her with something else if they wanted to get a conviction. If the law is just, she will walk free -- she should not be found guilty for a crime she did not commit.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:13 PM
1

What is that?
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:12 PM
1

That's a good point about men being able to work longer. I didn't think of that.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:12 PM
1

I tried, but that website is so badly designed that there's no way I'll be able to read it.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:11 PM
2

In most cases it's a non-issue. But in some cases it is extremely annoying, and I completely understand the annoyance they are expressing.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:09 PM
0

Aw thanks :))
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:07 PM
1

Sure, they are capable, but they don't ever do it. It's a very obviously male issue. But I don't see any reason it couldn't be referred to as spreading. Nor do I see any reason to not call it manspreading. The term doesn't bother me, since I don't do it anyway, and it annoys me regardless of what it's called.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:04 PM
1

Shocking people will keep her relevant. This is self-evident if you look at celebrities. Also she said all the terrorists so far have been men. That's not actually correct, but it's very almost correct. I think only 1 or so has been a woman, of the thousands who have been men.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:03 PM
1

That is a good analogy. I don't think I agree with that law, though, since it's a very slippery slope. You can never have control over how other people behave, nor should you be punished for other people's actions when you are not their legal guardian or some figure of authority over them, like their boss or their teacher.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:01 PM
1

I think most people would argue that unjust laws should be removed, as I said.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:47 AM
-2

What crime? Sending text messages? That's not a crime.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:29 AM
0

I don't understand why she would be facing trial. She didn't commit a crime. It's perfectly legal to tell someone to kill themselves; it's protected free speech.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:27 AM
-1

I don't understand why she would be facing trial. She didn't commit a crime. It's perfectly legal to tell someone to kill themselves; it's protected free speech.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:26 AM
3

The shirt you linked actually says "Antifeministin" which in German means female antifeminist. A male antifeminist is simply an "Antifeminist." That's probably why it's a lady in all of the pictures, doing things that feminists say are bad, like shopping, domestic chores (cooking), having sex with men(?).
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:17 AM
1

Laws should be enforced or removed. It makes no sense to have laws that go unenforced.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:15 AM
0

How would it be breaking the law? You said misogyny was the hate crime, not misandry.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:14 AM
3

So report them? And provide the link so we can report them too.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:09 AM
7

Male porn stars make no money. They lose nothing for firing him. Female porn stars make much more money. They would take a pay cut if they fired her.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:52 AM
1

Didn't you read? She's a married girl! She would never do something like that. /s
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:50 AM
3

I actually like your joke and found it funny. I didn't even recognize who that woman was in the second photo and was confused as to why she was being shown next to the attacker.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:48 AM
-6

a few inches at the minimum. This is not what people refer to when they refer to manspreading. Manspreading is invasive, obtrusive. Sitting with a normal amount of distance between your legs is non-invasive, non-obtrusive. This is manspreading. This is not manspreading. Do you have dangly bits? Cause mine get smooshed if I cannot spread my legs a few inches at the minimum. Mine never cause me any issues. When I close my legs all the way (which I never do, and is completely unnecessary to do), th…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:36 AM
1

Well, she's right.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:01 AM
5

men on average commit way more violent or physical crimes, and rape is definitely included in this type of crime. These two ideas have nothing to do with men being more likely to be raped.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 02:53 AM
-9

I have 0 issue with this. Manspreading is extremely annoying.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 02:05 AM
10

CDC doesn't count being made to penetrate as rape That is so sexist :( edit: Cathy Young actually wrote a very good critique of the radfem agenda of the CDC data: http://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers/
/r/MensRights08/06/17 01:42 AM
5

I am "sure" too -- as sure as one can be without evidence. I just wish the DOJ would do a damn study on this. Inmates are Americans too. When they are gathering data on American rape, they should never exclude prisoners, especially when the vast majority of prisoners are men. To exclude them is a very obvious sign of trying to propagate a narrative.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 12:00 AM
8

Men tend not to report rape So do women. Incarcerated offenders are even less prone to reporting a rape because it is viewed as snitching which is a very grave offense inside the prison walls Also the vast majority of men who are raped in prison are heterosexual, and there is a lot of shame related to their sexuality when these men are raped -- so much shame that they choose to not report their rapes and just try to forget that it ever happened.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 11:57 PM
1

I think 10 years is sufficient. I agree completely. That's a long damn time to lose from your life; certainly enough to think about what you've done and realize that actions like that come with a cost. It's not as if he killed someone. Money and property are replaceable. Rapes can be horrible, but they're mostly psychological crimes, which can be overcome with therapy.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 10:53 PM
2

Hey, OP, do you think the ACLU would be a relevant org to notify about this kind of treatment in the workplace?
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:36 PM
1

I would like to believe you, but I have difficulty doing so, as I'm very used to hearing this in the workplace. In what state is this illegal? Surely not mine (Florida).
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:35 PM
1

Where can I go to have him serve me? I guess not there, darn :(
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:31 PM
1

I'm honestly amazed that you even recognized this as discrimination. I'm so used to things like this that I wouldn't have even noticed.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:27 PM
-1

I would support that as a case of fraud. Rape is obviously ridiculous, but it's easy classifiable as fraud, since as you said, they got married, so that's a legal contract that he breached.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:54 PM
3

Agree completely. It's extremely fucked up that eye witness testimony is even allowed as a form of evidence in court.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:27 PM
-2

Why would ANYONE get 115 years in jail for burglaring a home and raping someone?
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:21 PM
0

If men would become at risk for being sexually harassed, their body has natural defense mechanisms to shut it down.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:06 PM
1

I have no idea why you would link me to that. It doesn't seem at all relevant to what I proposed.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 04:28 PM
1

It is obviously not irony because there is nothing that seems deliberately contrary here. A woman made a film, and she won an afford for it. It's very straightforward.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:21 PM
5

I thought I made it clear that the review was boring, not the book.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 10:02 PM
4

Oh okay that makes sense. I didn't realize she had had pretrial detention.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:27 PM
5

Before you blindly upvote, this is a sensationalist title. I read the whole book review he linked, and it was boring and a waste of time. They are just reviewing the book Spreading Misandry, which is a meninist piece of work that this book reviewer found to be badly written. It's a rather boring read (this review), and the title that OP used in no way represents the beliefs of the book reviewer; it is a direct quote from the book Spreading Misandry.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 02:49 PM
54

That's only on T/Th. On MWF we have Herstory and Patriarchal Marxism, and of course don't forget Women's Studies and Rethinking the Family, Sex, and Gender.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 02:44 PM
14

They are not being deprived of their other parent. She is serving 250 days (minus 133, because for some reason the judge decided to waive 133 days for no reason ?) + 31 days, + 15 days a year every November for 5 years I believe it was (or was it 3 years?). So she will end up serving less than 1 year of jail time in total. That's nothing for the crimes she committed.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 02:39 PM
10

Yes, it would. It's not an ideal solution, but it's the only one we have; I think it's silly to give sexist sentencing -- extremely harsh sentences to men, almost no sentences to women for the same crime. If I were redesigning the system, I would find middle grown -- more lenient sentences for men, and the exact same sentence for women that men would receive.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 02:36 PM
1

You'll be able to go to college for cheaper for one thing. HAH!! Yeah right. Maybe in NY?
/r/MensRights25/05/17 12:48 PM
1

😢
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:47 AM
1

I'm glad there weren't people saying that, since it was clearly an attack on LGBT people.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:46 AM
1

I don't know what you're reading, but nowhere in that tweet does it say "men hate women," nor does it ever say Muslim extremists weren't the ones at fault.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:44 AM
2

I agree. Marxist ideologies should be avoided at all costs.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:43 AM
1

Where do these people get the impression that coverage isn't going to do EXACTLY THAT? That's all they ever talk about is how women are victims, how the fuck can they continue to think that they AREN'T going to talk about women as victims? When that's all they ever talk about.. what the actual fuck LOL 😂😂
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:40 AM
-5

I think a lot of this is false actually. I got my driver's license years and years before I signed up for the draft. I think the only time I needed to sign up was to do the FAFSA, which is required for financial aid in higher education. Otherwise, I don't think I would have ever signed up for it. Also, until recently (Thanks Obama) I had gay privilege that would have allowed me to skip the draft. But at least I still have vegan privilege ?
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:37 AM
2

I know that disturbed me too.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:28 AM
-4

I disagree with her wording, but agree with her sentiment. But also she's making a lot of baseless assumptions. We have no idea if the girl consented to the video or not. For all we know, it was her idea. We also don't know whether he shared it or not, as there was no evidence that he did.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:27 AM
1

It's true though since there are many more women in the world than there are men. Your meme would only be meme-worthy if the numbers were more equal, or if men were the larger group.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:08 AM
4

Islam also hates gays, which is another reason I hate feminists for supporting it :/
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:04 AM
12

Yes.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:00 AM
5

But men are a minority. I don't get it. Women are the majority. Also I'm a white man who's also a minority since I'm gay. I wonder if they'd give me anything.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 12:59 AM
7

"The smallest minority on Earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights, cannot claim to be defenders of minorities."
/r/MensRights25/05/17 12:58 AM
2

If someone fears death as someone is attacking them is justification for murder. This is not defined as murder in the US. This is defined as justifiable homicide. There is a difference in the eyes of the law. Murder is illegal, whereas justifiable homicide is legal. I agree with what /u/mwobuddy said -- there is never a justification for murder. That's because murder is defined in a specific way in the US legal system such that it's always wrong and bad.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 09:37 PM
1

I doubt he will be in jail that long. Loads of people in situations like this either die before then, or they get out early "for good behavior."
/r/MensRights24/05/17 09:31 PM
10

Where is the part about women being denied access to their kids and being thrown out onto the street?
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:27 PM
2

Also the auto manufacturing industry.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:59 PM
1

Another crap article that links to an insufficient study. I read through the entire study, and nowhere did they link the questionnaire they used, which is complete crap. They could have asked the dumbest, most biased questions imaginable, on purpose, to promote their agenda that "more masculine" men are less egalitarian.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:57 PM
7

I'm not a history buff; can you tell me when in history this happened?
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:50 PM
1

It should be considered paternity fraud. Also theft if it later comes that he's forced to pay child support.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:03 PM
1

Yeah :/
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:02 PM
0

Thank you -- some numbers to prove my point.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:46 AM
8

The majority of women are okay with tricking a man into paternity [citation needed] because this is not even remotely true. Wendy William's band of degenerates in no way represents All Women™ lmao.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 09:33 PM
2

My best guess is that some men maybe feel belittled if a woman is interested in men's rights? This is not the case. There are many women who express interest in men's rights whom men love and adore, like Karen, Christina Hoff Sommers, Blaire White, Lauren Southern, etc. too many to list. Reddit is notorious for being a hate-filled groupthink machine. This happens on every single subreddit on Reddit. There isn't a single one I have found that isn't like this. I think many men on this subreddit pe…
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:22 PM
1

If misogyny were at play, wouldn't Bernie have gotten the nomination?
/r/MensRights21/05/17 02:32 PM
1

I know you're being sarcastic, but truthfully, I don't see how a real patriarchy could ever hurt men, by definition. The fact that we're seeing so many male-only issues is pretty damning evidence against a patriarchy, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 09:08 PM
1

Well duh.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:06 PM
1

Sometimes I wonder if an always-on voice recorder would be enough evidence, or if even that would get trumped by a woman's testimony. This would break federal wiretapping laws and would not be admissible in court.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:04 PM
2

Men can't be raped silly /s
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:02 PM
5

He hated more than half. He was only interested in blonde, blue-eyed white people who were also heterosexual and Christian. This accounts for -- what -- 10% of people?
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:34 PM
3

Ikr. No one has kowtowed to me for being gay.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:32 PM
7

Imo the people saying the first thing should stop associating themselves with the people saying the second thing.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:26 PM
3

Do they really take them willingly, though? Or is it more extortion ? Often it is the latter, especially in poorer nations.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:24 PM
1

I love this. Would also propose "men are creeps." Edit: Also something associated with "male tears" could be powerful. You know the stupid mugs some monsters drink out of. That could be cute overlayed with some sort of male suicide rate statistic.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:22 PM
2

Well duh, who wouldn't? That has nothing to do with the discussion.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:49 PM
2

Thank you. I notice so many misogynists here that sometimes I wonder why I even bother coming back. Where have all the brains gone? This subreddit used to be brimming with thought, now it's becoming all reactionary just like the feminists. Gross.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 03:41 PM
2

Good to know. I'll just keep my mouth shut and nod my head in agreement.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 03:37 PM
1

Actually feminists can't be sexist since only men can be sexist /s
/r/MensRights20/05/17 03:35 PM
3

Unfortunately, justice was never blind. If it had been from the beginning, we would never have such a stupid law.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 03:30 PM
1

I think people hate on him because he's a hypocritical close-minded dumbass, not because he's passionate about what he says -- that merely makes it worse.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 03:24 PM
3

This should be tagged NSFL. Fucked up shit like this honestly makes me so glad to be a gay man, because even if I were to ever be the victim of something fucked up like this, at least I'd have a good alibi that could get me out of the charges. #gayprivilege edit: I wonder who gets the restitution payment. Does he get it? Or the courts? I'm offended and disgusted that they picked such a low number. A person could make $90k a year, and he's getting $90k for four years behind bars, 4 years of his l…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 03:02 PM
7

women can spin a blatant piece of pro-woman discrimination into an anti-woman message You're both right. It is obviously pro-woman discrimination, but because of a patronizing, anti-woman thought process.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 02:52 PM
1

Yes I've seen Kmarts.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:42 PM
-3

I've never seen a Sears store in my entire 23 years of living. What planet are they located on?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:39 PM
7

Changing the rating system to protect Amy Schumer Who is amy schumer and why did she "need" protecting ?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:37 PM
0

I was banned from /r/feminism for using facts and logic. I don't do well with groups of idiots.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 11:18 AM
1

People at my work give a friendly touch on the arm all the time. It's a human thing to do. It seems you consented to the touching, so your anecdote is completely unrelated to what I was talking about.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 01:46 PM
2

Happiness and denial often go hand in hand. The most intelligent people are often the most depressed.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 01:45 PM
1

Sure, of course; men are included in "people."
/r/MensRights02/04/17 10:22 PM
3

Oh. Yes, you're right.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 09:33 PM
-1

However, a woman could win for something like you putting a hand on her shoulder while you congratulated her on a job well done. If we could stop letting people get away with feeling like a victim in an innocent situation, then maybe we could move forward in the workplace. Or maybe we could just not touch people without their consent.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 09:24 PM
7

The poor kid obviously didn't want to have this happen. This was always my expectation, but after reading about this topic for over a decade, it seems a lot of circumcised American men are convinced that they're happy they were circumcised as infants. So there really is no way of knowing whether the child would have wanted it, which is the whole point; until the man can consent, it should be assumed that there is no consent given.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 09:19 PM
6

Sure, just like everyone else.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:05 PM
1

I like what I have seen from her, yes.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 04:26 PM
-7

Maybe, but if there were family and friends of the man who "knew" that he was a good person, they could just as easily make one to support him.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:58 PM
-10

This has nothing to do with men's rights. There is nothing to indicate that what the people say in the crowdfunding campaign isn't true. Nothing in the article talks about why Samantha would be an unfit parent or a danger to her children. The people in the fundraiser mention that they know Samantha personally and "know" that she is a good person and a good mother, so there's really nothing to see here. It's their word vs the court's. They claim the court failed Samantha and that this is all one …
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:33 PM
2

I love Camille Paglia so much. One of the smartest people I know of.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:25 PM
2

If it has to get past the FDA, then about $2.87 billion in direct and indirect costs. Keep in mind, as well, that this study was conducted a few years prior, so it's quite possible total costs could be pushing past $3 billion per approved drug in 2016.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:23 PM
1

Nobody discovers a safe, effective medical treatment and decides NOT to make it available. NOBODY. Ever heard of marijuana? Your comment is factually wrong.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:20 PM
1

I was banned for posting a video from The Factual Feminist. Apparently facts are a banworthy topic.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:13 PM
1

You can't advocate for women's rights without falling down the rabbit hole of feminism these days What is this weird strawman argument? Why did so many people upvote you? What the hell. You could not be more wrong.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:12 PM
2

I have a $10 pair from H&M that has held up every single day for 2 years, and still hasn't fallen apart yet.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:05 PM
1

If we could control people's emotions, no one would have depression. Suicide wouldn't exist. Everyone would love their jobs and never want to quit. We obviously cannot control people's emotions, which is why striving to make everyone feel safe is stupid as fuck.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 02:56 PM
1

She wasn't a good actress though, even less a great one. Did you ever see Breakfast at Tiffany's? Not a good actress. Maybe she made movies later in her life where she performed better, but all I can see is that she was famous for being pretty, which she was indeed quite pretty.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 02:52 PM
2

I agree.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:29 PM
12

Not simply female privilege, but young, beautiful female privilege. You don't see old fat ugly women experiencing such privilege, I can guarantee it.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:06 PM
4

180°F is not boiling. Boiling is 212°F. But you're right, that's awful. But he definitely wasn't boiled; that would have been physically impossible at that temperature. He perhaps died of hyperthermia.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 02:44 PM
1

I don't see how you managed to get such a completely wrong impression, but okay.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 01:19 PM
1

The story did not happen in the US. It cannot be compared to the overwhelming sexism in the US legal system.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 01:15 PM
3

First, you should read what she actually said. She never criticized Beyoncé. http://www.eonline.com/news/834354/emma-watson-clarifies-her-comments-on-beyonce-s-sexuality-after-the-beyhive-calls-her-a-hypocrite
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:56 PM
1

What you said is basically exactly what Emma said in her interview.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:55 PM
4

Here is the full interview where Watson actually doesn't criticize Beyoncé. Talks about her, yes. Says what you quoted, yes. Criticizes? Absolutely not. Praises in fact. http://www.eonline.com/news/834354/emma-watson-clarifies-her-comments-on-beyonce-s-sexuality-after-the-beyhive-calls-her-a-hypocrite
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:54 PM
4

Not when he could have to pay child support for 18 years for doing so.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:38 PM
1

I don't think she's bad looking at all, just fat.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:35 PM
1

I sure hope they are. But I fear they aren't.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:35 PM
1

The duration of her registration on the list isn't stipulated. Exactly. so I guess you're insinuating she'll get off of it? Nope.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:30 PM
10

Please, you are so much less loved and appreciated than a dog.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:55 PM
3

Weird? Yes. Offensive to the point that they should be forced to apologize? Get out.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:54 PM
10

I don't find it even remotely offensive. It would never even occur to me to find it offensive.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:53 PM
0

But the article does state that she will now have to register as a convicted sex offender for the rest of her life. No, it doesn't say that at all.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:46 PM
5

That's very insensitive (pardon my pun).
/r/MensRights06/02/17 04:46 PM
2

Refusing the breathalyzer is always the correct choice and the only correct choice. No matter what.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:27 AM
1

God Florida is so fucked up
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:22 AM
7

Polygraphs are also notoriously unreliable. I find it hard to believe your story.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:21 AM
1

There would be an uproar because people would be unhappy about how a female child was being sexualized by their parent(s) for the sake of a music video. Unfortunately, this boy is being sexualized by his parents and no one cares because "six-year-old boys are just naturally sexual" or some delusion like this.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 06:39 PM
1

I think you have misunderstood the situation. The six-year-old boy in this video is Albert the rapper. This is his music video in which he objectifies women and sings about how much he loves them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGOuonAT8LY
/r/MensRights16/10/16 06:25 PM
13

It's easier to buy into the illusion that it's a good thing than it is to admit to yourself that you paid a man to sexually assault your son, leaving him with a permanent scar in his most sensitive and personal area, forever reminding him what you've done to him.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 06:11 PM
15

I really find this so disturbing. You know what decreases risk of HIV by nearly 100%? Condoms. Foreplay. Lubricant. Sleeping with people who are negative for HIV. Since not a lot of babies go around having unprotected sex with HIV positive people, I think it's safe to wait for the circumcision until the man in question is old enough to decide for himself if he even wants it.. since, after all, it is his body, isn't it? I think it is really patronizing for a parent to decide whether a doctor perm…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 05:59 PM
1

Try hundreds of millions. Billions by this point since it has been going on for so long.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 05:45 PM
2

They wouldn't have to. It's so easy to discriminate against people by simply claiming other reasons. "Oh, he wasn't what we were looking for. We didn't think he was a good fit. He didn't meet the criteria we were looking for. We had several more qualified applicants. . . . "
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:47 PM
3

And, most importantly, ask for the denial in writing. Often that is quite enough to change peoples minds. Good advice! I was looking for help in treatment against computer game addiction, but I was denied help as I wasn't a prioritised group. They just called me and said "No, sorry...". A bit later I asked for the decision in writing and... boom, they changed their minds. Denied by whom? Also always ask for the full name of the person denying you and/or make sure their name is on the written den…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:24 PM
1

Are you going to tell the aclu?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:13 PM
1

Especially if they don't have legal right to be there.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:08 PM
1

I like that this sentence is equal to what a man would get for the same crime. I don't like that the sentence is 25 years. That seems too harsh for anyone for this crime. 10 years seems ample.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 01:36 PM
0

I know, but I knew this would happen. It only strengthens my point.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 12:41 PM
-6

This is literally the exact response that feminists get. I don't agree with the response, but I just wanted to put things into perspective. Reddit is notorious for becoming a close-minded herd of sheep.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 01:38 AM
1

I suspect that they don't ban them, but I refuse to make assumptions. I would love someone to find this out and report back.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 01:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter