~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredFor purely medical reasons it is fine. But, for religous reasons they need to be able to consent. I'm not against boys getting it done just, they should be able to choose for themselves. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/21 11:41 PM |
| 9 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredI suspect alot of men are not in the UK. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 04:23 PM |
| 9 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredThank you for clarifying. But, the health benefits are actually little and anecdotal. The main reason for circumcision is to stop boys from masturbating. Health benefits are mainly because of phimosis and that can only be diagnosed until the boy has gone through puberty. It can take all the way from 3 years old to 16 years old to be able to retract. Plus, stretching exercises will rectify the issue if not the a steroid cream will help. I know this because, it took me to do stretches exercises fo… | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 02:19 AM |
| 11 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredhttp://www.intactaus.org/fgm-and-mgm-a-comparison/ | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 02:14 AM |
| 12 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredTrue | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 02:07 AM |
| 10 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredYou do know that men get their testicles and penis cut off for malicious reasons. Criminalising MGM will cover everything. In a perfect world instead of FGM or MGM it would be HGM (human genital mutilation). But, the people whom pass these laws are actually dumb. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 02:06 AM |
| 14 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredJust the UK. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 01:43 AM |
| 19 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredThe foreskin is the most sensitive part and it is actually comparable to FGM type 4 I think. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 01:07 AM |
| 23 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredGiving the males a choice over their bodily autonomy is men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 12:03 AM |
| 22 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredMight as well do the same with FGM then, because, by your logic it is safer. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 11:15 PM |
| 12 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredPlease don't breed or be near children. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 11:08 PM |
| 7 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredReligions main purpose of circumcision is to stop boys from masturbating. FGM and MGM are both barbaric practices and should be stopped. PERIOD! If you can't wash your own childrens genitals then that is child neglect because you're letting it get dirty and infected. The boys don't even get anaesthetised to numb pain. They scream like hell by the way. Boys die from circumcision because of blood loss, infection due to circumcision and permanent reduced sensation. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 11:07 PM |
| 11 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredIf you can't wash your childs genitals or don't teach them how to bathe properly then, that is the same as child neglect and you should not be having children if you can't look after them. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 10:55 PM |
| 15 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredWhat you are saying isn't plain and simple because you can't even structure a proper sentence. Female mutations?? It's not X-men. Please structure a proper sentence/paragraph. Doing it for religious reasons is no excuse to mutilate a boy whom cannot decide over his own bodily autonomy at his current age! For purely medical reasons it is acceptabe if and only if you have tried every other medical option. By the way, when it comes to religious circumcisions the person performing the mutilation eit… | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 10:53 PM |
| 16 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredI believe someone already answered this statement and it goes like this: One permanently scars you and changes your body permanently, the other is essential for survival. If your dad fucked you in the ass when you were six months old is that ok because it's your parents choice to do so? Look you're 15 years old, finish your education and come back for a real discussion when you've fully developed. You're way to young to be worrying about religion or politics | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 06:43 PM |
| 35 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredPreventing masturbation has ZERO benefit. And, it takes ZERO regard for a boys own bodily autonomy. Clearly you're circumcised which is the only real reason you disagree with the petition. You can't even look at it from a medical point of view means you are close minded. As someone stated before, just because it has been going on for millenia doesn't mean it is right. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 06:32 PM |
| 42 | Make Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) an offence unless medically requiredThe fact that you resort to insults shows you cannt have a normal conversation. The risks far out weigh the benefits and the benefits consist of anecdotal evidence. There is no concrete evidence to support your claim. Just look at America where 95% of boys or mutilated at birth (without consent). STD's are still a massive problem the same with penile cancer, which it claims to prevent is just laughable. As for religious reasons it is performed to stop boys from masturbating, that is the purpose … | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 06:22 PM |
| 1 | Why is men getting hit in the groin comedic and socially acceptable?Ban circumcision at birth unless this risks health of the child I want the Government to ban circumcisions (even ones that are done for religious reasons) on babies unless this would cause health problems. Without a reason circumcision should only be preformed above the age of 16. There is no reason to preform a circumcision on a baby because if you clean the area well it will be hygienic and new studies show that circumcision doesn't actually reduce the risk of infection. Therefore it shows the… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/21 06:01 PM |
| 9 | Why is men getting hit in the groin comedic and socially acceptable?Extend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a penis. https… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/21 06:00 PM |
| 2 | 6 million dollar payout for woman who never married and never lived with man... oh Canada...Ban circumcision at birth unless this risks health of the child I want the Government to ban circumcisions (even ones that are done for religious reasons) on babies unless this would cause health problems. Without a reason circumcision should only be preformed above the age of 16. There is no reason to preform a circumcision on a baby because if you clean the area well it will be hygienic and new studies show that circumcision doesn't actually reduce the risk of infection. Therefore it shows the… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/21 09:00 PM |
| 5 | 6 million dollar payout for woman who never married and never lived with man... oh Canada...Extend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a penis. https… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/21 08:59 PM |
| 35 | R.I.P Professor M. Strauss. The man who proved domestic violence is not a gendered issue.Violence does not have a gender. If we are making everything about gender then why not say suicide is a gendered issue since 80-85% of suicides are male. But, the government doesn't want to talk about that. Everything revolves around helping women and omitting men. | /r/MensRights | 04/06/21 08:50 PM |
| 12 | There needs to be better awareness the prevalence of male sexual exploitation in societyMen need a more legal protection. The government doesn't care too much about men. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/21 09:08 PM |
| 1 | What are your top 3 most important men’s rights issues?False accusations of rape. (destroys a man's life and stops victims of rape coming forward). Family courts (90% of women get custody of the children and the top reason why men suicide). MGM (mgm for religious reasons is horrible, it was done to stop boys from masturbating but, obviously it didn't work, now they just do it for a pointless tradition). | /r/MensRights | 26/05/21 11:11 PM |
| 3 | She Poured Boiling Water On Her Husband's Face After He Said He Wanted A Separation. She Received No Jail Time.Extend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a penis. https… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/21 10:57 PM |
| 2 | stop accusing men of things they didn't doExtend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a penis. https… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/21 10:42 PM |
| 2 | stop accusing men of things they didn't doBan circumcision at birth unless this risks health of the child I want the Government to ban circumcisions (even ones that are done for religious reasons) on babies unless this would cause health problems. Without a reason circumcision should only be preformed above the age of 16. There is no reason to preform a circumcision on a baby because if you clean the area well it will be hygienic and new studies show that circumcision doesn't actually reduce the risk of infection. Therefore it shows the… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/21 10:41 PM |
| 7 | Woman Gets Just 50 Hours Of Community Service For False Accusation Of Sexual AssaultExtend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a penis. https… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/21 10:40 PM |
| 4 | I feel really bad for OP's son. He ruined his son's life and expects his son to forgive him. OP should have asked for his son's side of the story first.Ban circumcision at birth unless this risks health of the child I want the Government to ban circumcisions (even ones that are done for religious reasons) on babies unless this would cause health problems. Without a reason circumcision should only be preformed above the age of 16. There is no reason to preform a circumcision on a baby because if you clean the area well it will be hygienic and new studies show that circumcision doesn't actually reduce the risk of infection. Therefore it shows the… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/21 10:01 PM |
| 3 | 72% of deaths from working too much are men. This is in addition to the workplace mortality rate of ~92%. Working too much causes heart problems and strokes, two of the biggest killers in men. Even more men are dying from stress related cardiovascular problems during COVID-19. (Source: WHO)Extend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a penis. https… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/21 09:56 PM |
| 5 | My childhood friend enjoys eating baby foreskin cause congress told him to. The dude commenting is a vocal "#savethekids" and feminist sympathizer as well as other popular philosophies.FGM is a criminal offence and so should MGM. Circumcision can have life long complications such as: penile amputation, testicular removal (both), too much skin taken can pull the penis back into the body resulting in a shorter penis, a botched curcumcision will lead to a second circumcision. Curcumcision has been known to cause erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation. I call on the government to outlaw this practice including with religion UNLESS it is for medical purposes ONLY. A child shou… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/21 04:55 PM |
| 2 | UK: Female student, 29, who said 'women have vaginas' and are 'not as strong as men' faces disciplinary action by university after fellow classmates complained about the 'offensive and discriminatory' commentsMake male genital mutilation a criminal offence. FGM is a criminal offence and so should MGM. Circumcision can have life long complications such as: penile amputation, testicular removal (both), too much skin taken can pull the penis back into the body resulting in a shorter penis, a botched curcumcision will lead to a second circumcision. Curcumcision has been known to cause erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation. I call on the government to outlaw this practice including with religion UNL… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/21 11:21 PM |
| 5 | Changes are happening in the UK but as always there's a catch...Just need this to happen too. The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a penis. https://pet… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/21 06:38 PM |
| 9 | Abuse is abuseThe current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a penis. https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/21 06:37 PM |
| 2 | Changes are happening in the UK but as always there's a catch...I've checked and it has 10,000 signatures, WFT! Why wouldn't you want to help men/boys too? These feminists and womens's aid need to get a damn grip. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/21 06:20 PM |
| 89 | Abuse is abuseThis is why men need better legal protection. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/21 11:53 AM |
| 5 | It Takes A Woman Insulting The Judge To Get The Same Charges As A Man But It's So SatisfyingGood! Why was she laughing so much lol? | /r/MensRights | 11/05/21 01:57 AM |
| 7 | This book on amazon is very against men. This post was previously removed.WFT, really? | /r/MensRights | 02/05/21 06:36 PM |
| 10 | This book on amazon is very against men. This post was previously removed.What does the book describe? | /r/MensRights | 02/05/21 04:54 PM |
| 5 | Covid reduced mens enrollment into college 7x that of womens..... a fact burried under feminists "WoMeNz MoSt AfFECTED bY COVID-19 even though men 40% more likely to die, 300% more likely to need ICU and 44% more life years lost globally by men than women due to COVID"Feminists don't care about men, simple. Feminists will bury any fact to help support for propaganda. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/21 07:55 PM |
| 1 | In Singapore, Males are CONSCRIPTED to the Military for 20-30 Years and Females aren't.Ban circumcision at birth unless this risks health of the child I want the Government to ban circumcisions (even ones that are done for religious reasons) on babies unless this would cause health problems. Without a reason circumcision should only be preformed above the age of 16. More details There is no reason to preform a circumcision on a baby because if you clean the area well it will be hygienic and new studies show that circumcision doesn't actually reduce the risk of infection. Therefore… | /r/MensRights | 28/04/21 10:40 PM |
| 1 | In Singapore, Males are CONSCRIPTED to the Military for 20-30 Years and Females aren't.Extend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. More details We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a… | /r/MensRights | 28/04/21 10:40 PM |
| 3 | Studies Show Lesbians Much More Likely to Beat, Sexually Abuse Their Wives Than Heterosexual MenYea, and the parnter cannot get justice because, people will laugh at them just as much guys get laughed at. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/21 08:10 PM |
| 2 | Apparently men can't even walk past a woman nowadaysWomen think they are the center of attention | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 11:02 PM |
| 2 | Men not being allowed to have dating standardsTry also being bald lol always stigma with baldness when trying to date | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 10:51 PM |
| 3 | /r/mensrights hit 300k subscribers yesterdayBan circumcision at birth unless this risks health of the child I want the Government to ban circumcisions (even ones that are done for religious reasons) on babies unless this would cause health problems. Without a reason circumcision should only be preformed above the age of 16. More details There is no reason to preform a circumcision on a baby because if you clean the area well it will be hygienic and new studies show that circumcision doesn't actually reduce the risk of infection. Therefore… | /r/MensRights | 19/04/21 12:04 AM |
| 7 | /r/mensrights hit 300k subscribers yesterdayExtend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. More details We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a… | /r/MensRights | 19/04/21 12:04 AM |
| 6 | Brother-in-law Can Also be Ordered to Pay Alimony Under Domestic Violence Law, Rules SC of IndiaWomen can now rob brothers too, shocking | /r/MensRights | 18/04/21 07:03 PM |
| 2 | "MANimony" Rich women are angry that they have to pay their husbands ALIMONY😂 yea, I get that humour, always love the cheesy jokes | /r/MensRights | 18/04/21 02:21 AM |
| 2 | "MANimony" Rich women are angry that they have to pay their husbands ALIMONYZero symphathy because, they don't mind taking our money. But, nope didn't strike a chord because we don't pay alimony in the UK. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/21 09:14 PM |
| 17 | "MANimony" Rich women are angry that they have to pay their husbands ALIMONYZero symphony lol it's about time the shoe was on the other foot | /r/MensRights | 17/04/21 06:30 PM |
| 1 | I've noticed that the Wikipedia entry about sexism, has been manipulated to be sexist against menI love joggers, too comfy lol but, I also love jeans for night outs | /r/MensRights | 17/04/21 01:18 PM |
| 2 | I've noticed that the Wikipedia entry about sexism, has been manipulated to be sexist against menDam, pp stuck in zipper is a constant fear for be tbh. Ever since I watched 'There's something about Mary'. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/21 03:51 AM |
| 3 | Women don't now just get to decide if you were creepy or romantic. Now they get to decide if you're a criminal.Extend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. More details We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/21 11:56 PM |
| 2 | STUDY finds that women are "significantly" more likely to be verbally and physically abusive to men than vice versaExtend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. More details We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/21 11:37 PM |
| 1 | A girl accused me of forcing myself onto her “as a joke.”Extend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. More details We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/21 11:40 PM |
| 2 | Would you guys appreciate an Opposite World? Included the female privilege checklistExtend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. More details We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/21 11:40 PM |
| 7 | Earl Silverman, the man who created the first shelter for male victims of domestic abuse in Canada.Extend the legal definition of rape The current legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth. This definition prevents victims of sexual acts, which did not involve a penis, or physical penetration, from receiving justice. This requirement is outdated and fails to accommodate for these individuals. More details We call on the Government to change the definition of rape to include all forms or sexual acts, even when it is non-penetrative and has not involved a… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/21 12:22 AM |
| 1 | I've noticed that the Wikipedia entry about sexism, has been manipulated to be sexist against menI know | /r/MensRights | 14/04/21 12:13 AM |
| 2 | "Incel" should not be used as a pejorative to bring men downHahaha, only downside I guess. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/21 08:31 PM |
| 3 | "Incel" should not be used as a pejorative to bring men downResearch for it being a good thing is purely anecdotal at best with other research debunking it. A quick Google search can tell us this. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/21 08:31 PM |
| 10 | I've noticed that the Wikipedia entry about sexism, has been manipulated to be sexist against menBan circumcision at birth unless this risks health of the child I want the Government to ban circumcisions (even ones that are done for religious reasons) on babies unless this would cause health problems. Without a reason circumcision should only be preformed above the age of 16. More details There is no reason to preform a circumcision on a baby because if you clean the area well it will be hygienic and new studies show that circumcision doesn't actually reduce the risk of infection. Therefore… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/21 04:41 PM |
| 2 | Sexism in theme parks - Belgian theme park group Plopsa keeps an eye on men who visit the parks alone. Nothing is said about women. (Article is in Dutch, English tl;dr in comments)Ban circumcision at birth unless this risks health of the child I want the Government to ban circumcisions (even ones that are done for religious reasons) on babies unless this would cause health problems. Without a reason circumcision should only be preformed above the age of 16. More details There is no reason to preform a circumcision on a baby because if you clean the area well it will be hygienic and new studies show that circumcision doesn't actually reduce the risk of infection. Therefore… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/21 04:08 PM |
| 10 | "Incel" should not be used as a pejorative to bring men downBan circumcision at birth unless this risks health of the child I want the Government to ban circumcisions (even ones that are done for religious reasons) on babies unless this would cause health problems. Without a reason circumcision should only be preformed above the age of 16. More details There is no reason to preform a circumcision on a baby because if you clean the area well it will be hygienic and new studies show that circumcision doesn't actually reduce the risk of infection. Therefore… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/21 03:52 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter