| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.Well I'm here, so obviously I don't put too much value on my safe space :P | /r/MensRights | 28/06/17 03:01 AM |
| 3 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.No thanks, but nice try snowflake. Good manner though :) | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 10:24 PM |
| 2 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.This one liked scraping | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 09:36 PM |
| 2 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.Sorry, didn't have time to conduct a research project on the differing attitudes towards sex of men and women, I only have my own experience on hand. Give me some time and I'll write you a thesis. I disagree regarding the Victorians. Attitudes are pervasive and lasting across time, we've been keeping these hunter gather gender roles since the dawn of society have we not? Also, I appreciate you coming from a place of argumentation, thanks for that. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 09:12 PM |
| -1 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.That's not the argument though. We're not debating who is legally responsible for the death. You're saying that I caused you to shoot him, when really I just gave you and ultimatum and you chose to shoot him instead of being shot. No one persons actions cause another persons. Causation and influence are vastly different concepts. Saying something like "you're bitchy behavior caused me to cheat on you" is denying the reality that I chose to cheat on you because I was feeling undesirable and this … | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 09:01 PM |
| 2 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.We were arguing the fundamental autonomy of choice. I acknowledge that the example I used was a poor one, and as I said above, if you remove the emotional reaction, what I was saying is even if someone is holding a gun to your head, you have to make a choice to comply and possibly live, or not comply and possibly be killed. It's still a choice and there is no shame in making that choice. Choosing to comply with a rapist does not imply that the victim is to blame. A victim needs to do whatever th… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 08:50 PM |
| 1 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.I agree, and I understood where you were going, teeth is never my go to move lol. I replied similarly to the comment below, but women receive very different messages about acceptable behavior sex than men do. The double standard still exists, believe me. Luckily for me, I have insanely liberal parents who gave me a thorough sex education, but all the sex Ed I received in school basically seemed like scare tactics. Couple that with intense social pressure to remain "virginal" or the stigma of bei… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 07:09 PM |
| 1 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.This wasn't the case for me, but I think many women are discouraged from exploring their sexuality by religious or cultural norms. Sex education teaches us how risky and scary sex is, and all the potential complications, but we never get told about having sex for pleasure. Girls especially are discouraged from masturbating because "good girls don't do that." Same with oral sex, we hear that it's gross and only sluts swallow or if you know too much about sex, you're a whore. I'm sure much of it s… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 06:56 PM |
| 2 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.I'm here to listen and discuss, but don't belittle me as delusional. In my experience and understanding of feminism it is about equal rights. Maybe you've just never spoken with a modern feminist, but not all self identified feminist believe the same things. Feminism has gone through many different waves and each has a different theoretical basis. You all want to be listened to, but can't show the same respect for someone of a differing opinion. I can accept and respect many of the claims made b… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 05:11 PM |
| 1 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.Not victim blaming, just a rhetorical argument, in hindsight not the best, as it's obviously a pretty inflammatory example. Try to separate the rhetoric from the emotional reaction and you'll see that what I meant was "in that situation you are still making a choice to save your life or avoid bodily harm." There is no shame in making a choice to save your life. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 04:59 PM |
| 2 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.Hahahaha that's what I thought too, but I've met some who do. I think it's kind of an S&M type of thing | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 04:41 PM |
| -1 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.Some women think that, yes, which is why I said good sex is about communication. Notice that once you asked for what you wanted, you got it. Everyone likes something different; some guys like teeth, some guys dont, some guys like a light touch, some guys want me to squeeze as hard as I can. You can't just assume everyone likes the same kind of sex or knows what you like, so sometimes you have to tell them (which is what an uninhibited sex partner does). If you're talking to your partner and givi… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 04:06 PM |
| – | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.I'm not sure you really understand feminism or my argument, actually. I'm advocating for equal rights and responsibilities regardless of gender which, correct me if I'm wrong, is a central tennant of both modern feminism and the men's rights movement. Unless we live in the Harry Potter universe where I can imperious curse you into doing my bidding, you have the ultimate responsibility for your actions. If you put a gun to my head and said, "have sex with this guy or I'll shoot you" you still cou… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 03:45 PM |
| -4 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.Also, infantilizing and condescending me really takes away from your argument. Let's focus on the facts and not stoop to ad hominem. Wouldn't want to be like those nasty feminist who tear down other women. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 03:29 PM |
| -5 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.😂 no one can make any other person do anything, you and you alone are responsible for your choices. No matter how awful your partner is, only you can make the choice to cheat instead of addressing it. Of course it's only his fault if he cheats, just like it's only your fault if you do. Bad behavior is bad behavior. Good sex really comes down to good communication, knowing what you need and being able to ask for it. That's what empowered men and women do. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 03:19 PM |
| 0 | Actual (NOT SATIRE) HuffPo headline: "My P(ussy) Is Better Than Your P(atriarchy)!" -- The case for “cheating back” as a means toward empowering women and to expose and challenge fragile masculinity (archive)Ugh. This is not feminism. This is not good advice. This is not even good writing. Please do not be fooled into thinking that this is what feminism is about. Cheating is not about sex, cheating is about not getting your needs met and not addressing it in a respectful and responsible way. Doesn't matter who does the cheating, it's a sign of emotional insecurity and unclear boundaries in a relationship. An empowered woman knows she does not need to stay with a dishonest man and doesn't retaliate. … | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 03:13 PM |
| 1 | An angry reply about what men need from a ''sexually uninhibited woman'' to the feminists who say women have to cheat men back.Debated replying to this, but here it goes: Doesnt saying that a woman's goal should be to catch and keep a man contradict everything that men's rights are supposed to be about? This reads like you're manipulating a man to stay with you because you're good in bed. If all you have to offer is sex, why wouldn't he cheat? Lots of women are good in bed, but men stay in relationships because they get emotional fulfillment. Men are just as capable of leaving an unsatisfactory relationship as they are … | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 02:51 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter