emof Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Of 27 Deadliest Mass Shooters, 26 of Them Were Fatherless \| RealClearPolitics An equally good explanation for this could be that people who lack empathy have a tendency to leave their family. They also get children who inherit that trait, which can also be used to explain school shootings. In that case, lacking a father in your life has nothing to do with shool shootings. People need to learn that correllation does not equal causation.	/r/MensRights	28/02/19 06:53 AM
3	Of the 27 Deadliest Mass Shooters, 26 of Them Had One Thing in Common No, they show a correlation.	/r/MensRights	08/02/19 09:23 PM
3	Of the 27 Deadliest Mass Shooters, 26 of Them Had One Thing in Common No, lazy argumentation is assuming there is causation when all they find is correlation.	/r/MensRights	08/02/19 07:37 PM
3	Of the 27 Deadliest Mass Shooters, 26 of Them Had One Thing in Common Say it with me: correlation does not mean causation	/r/MensRights	08/02/19 04:42 PM
1	Woman throws stuff and kicks husband after incessantly screaming, he gets up and slaps her. He gets arrested. Yes. I keep hoping for a more rational MRA subreddit, which actually focuses on men's issues and not on feminist/women bashing...	/r/MensRights	11/12/18 07:17 AM
-3	Woman throws stuff and kicks husband after incessantly screaming, he gets up and slaps her. He gets arrested. I have a really hard time understanding how people can watch this and say they are both equally at fault. How is throwing cardboard and nagging the same as hitting someone? Listen to the kids and when they start crying, is it when cardboard is being thrown or when he beats their mom? To me this is just more evidence for how idealism can cloud someones rationality. The worst part is that post like these make it easier to dismiss men's right issues as cooked up by idealistic teenagers, with no sen…	/r/MensRights	10/12/18 01:34 PM
5	When they complain about "manspreading", show them this. People need to read the article before commenting (or making click bait titles). The part about the importance of men spreading their legs apart was about having a laptop in their laps, and the danger of overheating the scrotum (in that specific case). Nothing in the article suggests that you need to do this in other cases.	/r/MensRights	08/12/18 07:52 AM
5	Reminder- the Men's Rights Movement is NOT part of the alt-right, or connected to today's rally. We are not political in any sphere other than men's issues. Mens rights != Anti feminism. Maybe there should be a similar post about that..	/r/MensRights	13/08/18 08:21 AM
-3	And they wonder why men are going their own way. ITT: People not managing to read more than one paragraph, because yellow	/r/MensRights	20/07/18 06:11 PM
1	My school forces me to validate myths that don't exist Doesn't seem very implied when the only reason the text gives for the difference is that men and women choose different things. Actually, the opposite seems to be implied -> women earn less than men because they choose occupations that pay less. It is also pretty obvious that this assignment doesn't "force me to validate myths that don't exist".	/r/MensRights	06/01/17 09:30 PM
4	My school forces me to validate myths that don't exist I don't see anything wrong with the text. It doesn't say anything about discrimination or that this means different wages for the same job. It just states that women earn less than men, and even explains that part of this reason is that women have different jobs (and, again, does not say that this is because of discrimination). The text is totally open when it comes to if there is any discrimination going on. Therefore, it gives you an opening to explain various reasons for why the difference mi…	/r/MensRights	06/01/17 05:38 PM
1	Give dads a gift they can really use this Father’s Day: paternity leave This is how it works in norway. Currently enjoying 14 weeks of paternity leave :) Actually, you cannot devide it exactly as you want. Mothers and fathers have to take out some weeks (4 each), and the rest can be divided as you like.	/r/MensRights	20/06/15 11:58 AM
1	I recently started dating a woman(31) and i'm 26, she told me she was going through a divorce which was true. So i actually talked with the husband at one point and he confirmed they were getting a di Every crime comitted by a woman against a man is not a men's rights issue. Just like every crime comitted by a man against a woman isn't a feminist issue. You are just speculating that she gets special treatment because she is a woman, but nothing really points to that.	/r/MensRights	21/10/14 05:25 AM
2	I recently started dating a woman(31) and i'm 26, she told me she was going through a divorce which was true. So i actually talked with the husband at one point and he confirmed they were getting a di I understand why you are feeling hurt/angry over this, but this has no relevance to men's rights. I think threads like this hurts the agenda of the men's rights movements. Speculating that "if I had done this, that would have happened" is no better than what some feminists say about hypothetical situations where women are mistreated.	/r/MensRights	20/10/14 01:13 PM
9	You wouldn't define a thief as "typically black", so Oxford shouldn't refer to a rapist as "typically male". (Considering how young boys can be sexually abused by older women) How common is it for females to rape. Any statistics on this? I guess a better analogy would be that criminal is typically male (which is true).	/r/MensRights	25/01/14 06:07 PM