TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

empirical_accuracy Archive

View 3 posts and 80 comments by empirical_accuracy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

The whole new look seems like a calculated publicity stunt. I see very little reckless behavior in the press. It's all photo shoots and professional events. Just because she's nekkid and is going with a bit of a counter-culture style doesn't imply that she's bonkers. This. Miley - or her publicist - seems to understand very well that controversy sells. I seriously doubt Miley is stupid.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 11:08 PM
10

Killing, selectively, all the men but not the women in a population is a time-honored practice invoked in traditional warfare. It's the sort of thing you expect a bronze age army to do when sacking a city, even if there's no visible racial difference.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:35 PM
5

Because most people react negatively to jokes about women being raped, while jokes about men being raped are pretty damn popular. So "real" rape culture, meaning an exhibit of a rape joke that is condoned by something that might actually be a majority of the culture, as opposed to the acts / jokes that are roundly disapproved of by a large majority.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 10:06 AM
2

As Piroko says, it's largely other women throwing labels at your choices. And largely women throwing labels at men's choices, too. Women exert most of the normative pressure on both male and female gender roles in the modern western world.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 12:08 PM
2

The reason why she is being called a troll is because /r/MensRights is collectively really tired of being painted as big fans of traditional gender roles. Traditional gender roles aren't terribly well regarded here, especially the traditional male gender role with the bits involving doing all the dirty work, dying early, and falling through the holes in the social safety net if anything bad happens to you personally. However, many feminists keep insisting that only traditionalists oppose feminis…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 05:57 AM
4

Well, here's what the study is looking at: Everything. The authors are attempting to look at the broadest and largest scale possible. It's almost dead certain that there are ways in which discrimination in favor of women is practiced... in some areas. There are also, almost certainly, still a few areas in which discrimination against women is practiced. For example, there was a recent - and much-touted - study showing that female applicants for a lab assistant position were rated lower, cited as…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 07:47 PM
20

Original paper: http://www.ec.bgu.ac.il/monaster/admin/papers/1006_2.pdf It is worth noting that the effect of men's attractiveness is much larger than the effect of women's attractiveness on hiring. Previous studies have shown that the effect of height and attractiveness on men's income is stronger than on women's income: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00458.x/abstract http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00223980.1989.10543009 http://psycnet.apa.org/journal…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 07:54 PM
3

For some of the stuff that was going into a paper about the effects of block scheduling on middle/high school achievement, I literally had to go 3-5 layers deep on citations to actually find the real study that went into the conclusions of these articles, and even with the real study, data is pulled from all over. I think there are two important factors that play into this: Academics being selective with citations in order to manipulate impact factor. There's some "I scratch your back, you scrat…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:14 AM
3

The BLS report mentioned: http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-letter/2013/august/part-time-work-employment-increase-recession/ Note that the share of part-time work is increasing, and that the gap in full-time positions is without controlling for choice of occupation; and uses earnings rather than total compensation, which becomes very significant in looking at full-time work, as women tend to select full-time jobs with better benefits in exchange for lower wages. Also w…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 11:40 PM
1

I'm not terribly fond of the film. That said, as far as ideological issues go, it spends a lot of time having strong female protagonists, passes the Bechdel test, and villifies male sexuality; but has also a female villain thrown in the mix and is full of sex and violence. For example, a feminist who liked it: http://www.lunalindsey.com/2011/03/analysis-of-sucker-punch-feminist.html And one who didn't like it: http://news.moviefone.com/2011/03/28/faux-feminism-in-sucker-punch/ From the MRA persp…
/r/MensRights28/10/13 11:42 PM
5

This is very interesting stuff. Thank you for posting it. It's perhaps worth thinking more about where this comes from. I'm wondering if it might have to do with the public sector / private sector divide - the public sector remained largely unionized in that period, while the private sector de-unionized with a vengeance.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:54 PM
2

I would point out that most of the things labeled "patriarchy" are things that WOMEN enforce. It's "women oppressing themselves" much more than it is "men oppressing themselves." It's true of everything from slut-shaming to pushing women away from STEM jobs to anti-abortion activism. Women are much more involved with all of it. In some cases, it can even be traced specifically to feminism, such as the first wave deploying the "tender years" doctrine, and the modern second/third wave fighting aga…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:17 AM
11

I like having video coverage of major events, but I don't like video titles like "Crazy Queers Disrupt Men's Rights Rally at Queen's Park." It feeds exactly into the opposition line and the sort of delusions that the small man with the megaphone exhibited.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:13 AM
6

Likewise with me. I identified as feminist until well after I started getting accusations that I was an MRA and therefore should shut up. We probably want to focus on more prominent feminists, however.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:09 AM
8

Kanin's famous study outlined three major categories, which it classified the cases by: Alibi function. (56%) Most false rapes involved a false claim of rape in order to explain consequences of sexual acts in a way which relieves the claimant of responsibility. Sometimes this is done in order to obtain medical resources, e.g., an abortion paid by someone else, STD screening / treatment, etc. In some cases, there wasn't an actual pregnancy or STD, just the worry that pregnancy or STD transmission…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:03 AM
1

If you do some careful searching, you'll find that Warren Farrell continued to refer to himself, occasionally, using the word "feminist" in interviews like this one: http://www.salon.com/2001/02/06/farrell/ Feminists, on the other hand, have been disowning him since the eighties.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 11:02 PM
1

NOW briefly pushed for women to be subject to Selective Service registration after it was reinstated in 1980. It has been generally rare, though.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:37 AM
9

So next, when the police fail to prevent disruption of the event by feminists, will the university be liable?
/r/MensRights24/09/13 08:00 PM
3

Even just admitting that the best interest of the child lies sometimes with the father, even in a case where the child is a daughter, is forward progress on this issue.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:58 PM
5

Most of us here and elsewhere view Robin Hood as a hero. We know that there are some people with lots of money and some people who are poor, and that some of the people who are poor are more deserving of money than some of the people who are rich. So why don't we run around stealing from random rich people who can afford the loss and giving to the poor? Because that violates the rule of law. We shouldn't have one rule for unpopular people and one rule for popular people; we want one rule for eve…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:40 PM
114

Yeah, that's particularly striking. If you dump your boyfriend for being unambitious, that's YOU having a problem with his lack of success.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 04:14 PM
2

There is hiring discrimination, and for a variety of reasons. It also is very field-specific, even inside of academia. Both of the studies conducted directly on hiring discrimination in those two links - the second contains a lot of other supporting studies on related topics - are dealing with psychology departments. You notice it doesn't study the hiring habits of departments in the physical sciences or mathematics, where there's a shortage of female faculty? Women represent just under half of …
/r/MensRights18/09/13 04:48 PM
3

I'd say so. It's a lot less dramatic, but that's usually the case; historical truths are often a lot less dramatic than the grand stories people like to tell. Some people would contest even that, on the grounds that women have always had some rights that men haven't, meaning men and women simply had different rights. And that really comes down to an argument over what actually is a "right," and what rights are important. But it's pretty much true that before the twentieth century, women often la…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:19 AM
3

What I mean is that up until recently they never had real rights as a man did. If a man wanted to beat his wife, it was totally fine, provided that the stick wasn't much thicker than this thumb. That's a myth. See below: http://www.debunker.com/texts/ruleofthumb.html http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2550/does-rule-of-thumb-refer-to-an-old-law-permitting-wife-beating Unfortunately, it's a popular myth - as you can see, it was extant as a myth nearly two centuries ago, with some people in …
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:27 AM
5

It's not clear that's ever been the general case. Spartan women, for example, would run the household while their husbands were away at war, something Spartan men, as a warrior elite class, were often busy with. Roman women could own land in their own right; and the Romans had laws against wife-beating. While women have generally historically not had equal rights to men, it's been the general case that women have had rights, and that rights have been stratified more by class than by gender; uppe…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:01 AM
8

Because it's not something that's been accurate in Western society since well before the arrival of even first wave feminism. Wife-beating has been generally disapproved of for a long time.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 02:30 AM
4

I think what's strange isn't that he called the cops on his dad; but that he described his dad as pulling a knife on his mom when his mom is the one who pulled out the knife.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 05:24 PM
1

My experience with actual lesbians is that lesbians are generally not nutjob radfems. Most lesbians are not lesbian separatists. Some of them get along with men just fine. Also IMO, "political lesbians" are, not uncommonly, "fake" lesbians. Women who identify as lesbian for ideological reasons have generally demonstrated sexual attraction to men and identifying as straight for some period of time. I've known a number of women who were super into feminism and decided their sexuality was going to …
/r/MensRights15/09/13 06:28 PM
0

There have been studies attempting to control for as many factors as possible. There's generally been a small lingering gap, declining over time. It certainly was present in the early eighties. E.g., see: http://aysps.gsu.edu/isp/files/ISP_SUMMER_SCHOOL_2008_CURRIE_Swimming_Upstream.pdf A difference also showed up in the salary offers in a recent study looking at hiring a student for a lab manager position. See here: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/09/14/1211286109 Male faculty, on averag…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 09:25 PM
1

90 cents on the dollar is fairly close to what some of the more serious studies claim. At that point, most of the difference comes in what you're choosing to control for, what should be controlled for, and how you're collecting the data.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 03:04 AM
0

Why do women not come if they're charged a cover? Because they could get in other places for free. A two-price model is a stable equilibrium, but if nobody charged two prices, voila, you would not be a "sausage fest" for not providing a discount for women.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:06 AM
1

It has a lot to do with attractiveness and being well-groomed. I've noticed women, especially young women, make a beeline for me on buses, passing up more conveniently located seats with less attractive or less tidy-looking men; and sometimes empty seats, as well. ...because if they take an empty seat, someone else will decide to sit next to them, and that might be someone unkempt, ugly, or scary.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 08:37 PM
2

Post it in sections. People usually upvote the comment(s) that continue the story.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:01 AM
3

Nope. No problem. Elinder actually mentions that this is one possible reason for men to survive more often, but he assumes that if men are attempting to rescue women, their survival rate will drop below that of women. By that logic, we should expect that lifeguards drown more often than the people they are trying to rescue, and firefighters more often than those in the buildings they try to put out. I'm pretty sure that neither of those is the case.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:58 PM
9

It is not that a gender studies professor was incompetent. It was that the second-most prominent male gender studies professor (next to Michael Kimmel) was incompetent. Hugo Schwyzer was (and is) one of the most prominent male feminists. He was very popular. He was buddies with all the right people. He had ringing endorsements from all the right people. All because he was a man who was parroting the feminist line and saying what feminists wanted to hear men say. A prominent member of a group is …
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:46 PM
3

I would disagree. Academia is not a joke. There are problems with how many colleges are run and marketed, and there are some fields within academia that are rotten; but you still need the universities, their massive research facilities, engineering, mathematics, teacher training, medicine, et cetera. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:42 PM
9

These are not in fact the only problems with the research. One of the major problems with the research is that 19th century men were much better at swimming and breaking down doors than 19th century women and children. If you look at where the female casualties come from in their selection of wrecks, a lot of them involve situations where the survivors had to swim through rough seas or physically break their way out through locked hatches or flooded sections. A couple involve situations where th…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 08:44 AM
20

Do note that the people making games - both tabletop games and computer games - have studied what men and women like to play as, and come to the conclusion that women want to play as attractive characters, in general. There's a strong pattern of this. For example, see here for a survey of WoW players on race and player gender.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 09:54 AM
2

In one word, great. In more than one word, we're happy to see each other, my visits are welcome (she doesn't travel well), she and I are among the most frequent posters on each other's facebook walls, and she's supportive of my decision to look critically at the problems with the masculine gender role. We have friction once in a long while, but usually make up with each other the same day or the next day.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 12:42 AM
9

The man who never wanted to become a father is not the one to blame for the child not having a father. It is the woman who decided to become a single mother, when she had all the alternatives in the world, including giving her newborn up for adoption to one of the enormous number of older couples who would be willing to give that child two parents. Adopted children do just fine. And a child who had one parent vanish at, around, or before the child's birth and is raised by the other need not feel…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:55 AM
3

It's entirely possible that she is familiar with the play only from having watched some particular director's re-envisioning of the play, and never actually read the written play or read about it; people do very creative things with Shakespeare in the theater, "traditional" performances of The Taming of the Shrew are virtually unheard-of, and she probably never covered it in college.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:52 AM
6

Wait, did you say she summarized "The Taming of the Shrew" as "the woman ends up taming the man," or was that a typo? Because in "Taming of the Shrew," the plot is basically this: Man A, B, and C all want to marry Sister A, but Sister B is older and Sister A's parents won't let her marry until Sister B gets married. Sister B is a bitch and Sister A is a sweet beautiful thing. Man D shows up and Man A convinces her to court Sister B. Man D fucks with Sister B's head a bit while courting her, basi…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:40 AM
11

Some men's issues are even more relevant to men who are not straight. Like the distrusted-around-children thing.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 10:04 PM
1

You may find the following helpful: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/wttjq/results_of_the_2012_gender_subreddit_survey_and/
/r/MensRights22/04/13 03:13 AM
3

It's true, though his figures are very wrong. There are fewer rapes of women reported to the police than there are rapes of men. You're more likely to be raped than falsely accused of rape; but both rates are much higher than he reports. See "Made to Penetrate" data here: http://cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf And see here for an overview of the limited literature on false allegations: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/4509177 Note in particular that nearly all the papers…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 05:31 AM
3

I notice that the comments mostly express a great deal of disappointment about there not being pictures of the men included.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 08:56 PM
2

The idea that gender identity is performative is a useful one; and some of the most telling insights come from people who have chosen to perform the role of the opposite gender. I have found Butler's ideas to be inspirational in my explorations of the problems associated with being a man in modern society. How masculinity is policed, performed, and how to break that is a nice thing to talk about. I expect that Butler herself is not particularly fond of us, if she is even aware of us, but the ide…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:57 PM
2

For reference, those of you reading to the end and seeing the reporter optimistically suggest Tesla might change his mind, he never married. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla#Relationships
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:46 PM
1

Let me put it in context then - in the US. Lots of US high schools / middle schools have individual showers for girls and group showers for boys; and that's also the case in a number of US community centers / gyms.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:45 PM
3

There's actually something very unusual that many of you probably aren't aware: Typically, girls'/womens' locker rooms have individual showers; even in the same facilities where boys'/mens' locker rooms have group showers.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 12:47 AM
3

The OP claims that these are gender-swapped quotes from /r/MensRights and representative of /r/MensRights. I have attempted to search for several of them using the search tool and the appropriate gender-swapped nouns. I have thus far failed to find any of them; much less establish that any of the genuinely objectionable quotes are upvoted comments. In particular, I started with the first three: "Men, as a whole, are superior to women. Its just a matter of fact." Text search on /r/MensRights: Not…
/r/MensRights01/04/13 12:30 PM
8

Patriarchy is more than just who-is-the-head-of-the-household business, it's about structures of society. And while it used to be that men got the children, nowadays women get them. That is a bad thing. Custody should not be based on gender either way. Like I mentioned before, most feminists dislike the idea of matriarchy. Did I or did I not say that you needed to know your history? Read up on what happened to child custody laws during feminism's first wave. Read up again on what sides feminist …
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:24 PM
3

What are goals of this movement? Equal rights for men. Broadly and specifically (in terms of legislation, etc etc)? How would you like people to perceive the movement? Affirmative action programs targeting men in fields in which men are under-represented and discriminated against. Defining and prosecuting rape, domestic violence, and other crimes currently only treated as "women-as-victim" crimes in a truly gender-neutral fashion. Not simply nominally gender neutral; if a woman forces a man to p…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 09:19 AM
50

Feminists do not want you to lose custody of your children. The assumption that women are naturally better caregivers is part of patriarchy. Before feminism got started, men received default custody of children in divorce. The Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments states: He has so framed the laws of divorce, as to what shall be the proper causes, and in case of separation, to whom the guardianship of the children shall be given, as to be wholly regardless of the happiness of women--the law, in…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:39 AM
36

The fraction of accusations that are false for one reason or another - eyewitness misidentification, fabrication, et cetera - is about as likely to be over fifty percent as it is to be under ten percent. Fifty percent is almost certainly too high, ten percent is almost certainly too low. There are certainly more false negatives - failure to report a rape - than false positives; but the percentage of accusations that are true are the ratio of false positives to all positives. The false negatives …
/r/MensRights25/03/13 05:33 AM
78

And it is precisely the people like that, who claim that false accusations are rare exceptions, who are the reason why the Brian Banks case happened as it did; I believe someone has pointed to this study before talking about the percentage of false convictions: http://www.urban.org/publications/412589.html The fact of the matter is, in an environment where lots of people are yelling that rape allegations are almost never fabricated, a "he said, she said" case can put a man in jail. Especially wh…
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:26 AM
3

Which is one reason I linked directly to the study! Have a look at it if you can.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 07:16 PM
7

I probably should have linked to the one on the Bristol University site in the first place: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/news/2012/8981.html I don't think that one's behind a paywall. Sorry about that, folks.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:17 AM
8

Cynic, the Gervais study does not show men paying attention to female body parts more; it shows both genders identifying women by parts more, and fails to detect, but does not disprove, a gender difference in doing so. To a large degree, this study shows a number of things that Gervais simply did not report on, because she either did not test for it or she did not have a statistically significant result. One problem with the Gervais study is that the body parts used vary more substantially on wo…
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:02 AM
79

Direct link to study: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0047870
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:10 PM
8

The key word is "prosecuted." Most people making a false accusation are not prosecuted for doing so.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:00 AM
6

It's not true. It used to be, something like fifty years ago, but currently, sleeping around is looked down on, whether you're a man or a woman. The myth that people still look up to other men who are promiscuous is still around, but very few people actually subscribe to it personally - they just think everybody else does. A few sources to look at: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/17/study-find-erosion-double-standard-students-and-sex http://pwq.sagepub.com/content/22/3/505.short http:…
/r/MensRights09/03/13 03:59 AM
24

Which means they probably are including tipped workers based on base pay rates, whether or not tips bring them up over the federal minimum wage.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:14 AM
12

I doubt it is satire; but if it is, someone has put an incredible amount of work into constructing the satirical personality's feminist credibility.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 07:29 AM
8

Unless she did something which clearly implied consent she's not mentioning And that's an enormous unless considering how much detail is present in the letter, which is why I'd say we can't be sure.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:24 PM
1

I think he's saying he's had many girlfriends who all liked beets. There then comes a point where you reach the conclusion that a typical woman likes beets. It's a very bad habit for women to have - playing hard to get is often individually useful, in terms of manipulating your partner and managing your reputation, but it's socially destructive when it comes to rape.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:19 PM
1

In most of them, in fact.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:08 PM
4

The thing that bothers me about a lot of the comments here and in /r/Feminism is that they assert to know, for sure, whether or not what happened was rape. We have a verbal communication that she doesn't want to go all the way, at the outset. We then have some unknown amount of activity in between. It is possible she just froze in terror and lay there, in which case she did not communicate consent, and it was rape. It is also possible that she was acting and reacting seemingly enthusiastically, …
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:07 PM
2

Good point. It's probably not an actual teenager. A lot of "Dear ___" letters are actually written by the columnist / editor.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:44 PM
2

It's also the third WH petition to come up on Reddit asking for this, that I've seen. Here are the other two: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/require-women-register-selective-service-age-18-their-male-counterparts/95pfTq6v https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/change-selective-service-requirements-include-women-aged-18-25-who-are-now-approved-combat-roles/vlNJq8gy
/r/MensRights02/02/13 01:31 AM
3

I recommend that you also, if you are on Facebook, go to your privacy settings, specifically block Luluvise under "Blocks." If Facebook is actually handling application blocks the way they're supposed to, this will prevent it from connecting with your account. However, I wouldn't put faith in just that. So. Next, go into "Applications," and review what data-sharing you have enabled. Turn off anything you're not attached to, and consider carefully what you're leaving on.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:57 AM
3

I'm surprised Germaine Greer hasn't come up in the comments here, as a prominent feminist who very prominently has a thing for young boys: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germaine_Greer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beautiful_Boy
/r/MensRights29/01/13 11:36 PM
3

If you already think you know what advice you would receive IRL from anyone you trust the integrity and competence of, you probably should be following that advice.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 08:32 PM
15

Click "preferences." Uncheck the box that says "allow reddits to show me custom styles."
/r/MensRights14/01/13 02:32 AM
1

Note, this is mostly because most self-identified 'feminists' really are egalitarians and are reasonable. (At least ones I encounter). It's a shame I don't have the same experience online. I can tell you why: People aren't as willing to engage in conflict in person. You will see more extreme and less popular views online, and people will be more likely to display, defend, or confront such views. People who nod and tell you they think you have an insightful point might actually go post on Reddit …
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:43 PM
3

How does one deal with that?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:59 AM
1

And yet, when I went browsing through Reddit again today, I saw that exact statement made in /r/AskFeminists. It really seems to be exactly what happens whenever someone brings up male victims - some supposed feminist rolls out the claim that men are the ones committing rape as if that somehow is supposed to settle all discussion about male victims of rape.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:16 AM
21

There are many other rape debates. For example, the men/women debate: F: Rape is oppression of women by men! M: Men are raped, too! F: But by men! Crime statistic numbers showing rapists are only men! M: No, also by women! Studies showing sexual coercion by women and/or denouncement of FBI rape definitions! Then there's the false accusation debate: M: False accusations happen in significant numbers and ruin men's lives! Don't automatically believe accusations of rape! F: False accusations are a …
/r/MensRights20/09/12 09:58 AM
11

It's important to note first that this question is really two different questions. First, why, historically, have many societies settled on requiring male leaders? The answer to this question is prescribed gender roles, which were still occasionally violated. Second, why, in the modern age, in countries with do men still occupy a high percentage of leadership positions? The answer to this is complex, but contains many more details. And the answer is "maybe that's changing, right here, right now.…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:52 AM
5

Messaging volume goes the other way on OKCupid. It will be interesting to see if this website is successful; another with a similar messaging model, where only women were allowed to initiate contact, has more or less already failed. Its name was Herway, and although the website is still up, there's no sign that it's doing anything. The people running it haven't even made a blog post in the last year. This also presents a natural experiment: If this one succeeds, then it does suggest that the obj…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 11:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter