TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

endogenic Archive

View 1 post and 126 comments by endogenic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
27

Fitnessendogenic/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 01:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

😂 it me
/r/seduction08/10/19 10:23 PM
3

You mean poly (and bi)? Sure, but I'd guess it's assumed to be default when saying "my girlfriend" that most people would consider that a likely social cue that you're monogamous, rather than "one of my girlfriends"... but what do I know? I'm only 13.
/r/seduction08/10/19 07:53 PM
2

Way I see it, as long as you've got friends who are girls (and if you've had girlfriends before), you're allowed to use this :)
/r/seduction08/10/19 04:54 PM
49

TFW when you get disillusioned with earthlings and start dating aliens…
/r/seduction08/10/19 04:40 PM
7

"dude sorry to tell you, I'm not gay" haha just be like "so my girlfriend and I…" because after all, if the subtext is they're truly interested in you (given your identity), then for what reason could a supposedly genuine friendship suddenly disappear?
/r/seduction08/10/19 04:40 PM
2

I think it's normal to recognise that women and men are different. Like for instance most guys will hug their female friends but won't do the same with their Male counterparts You should verify this instead of relying on thinking. That genders treat the other sexes differently is not proof that they are different. That's merely a tautology. I think I've noticed you switch causes and effect elsewhere, as well. You've said you have zero female friends. I have a suggestion. Associate romance with s…
/r/seduction02/09/19 02:33 PM
2

Hookups and dates are relationships too. When you stop repressing what you have to admit and gain the self-esteem to be incorrect about things but still be a worthwhile, self-valid/reliant existence, your life will change. At that point you'll be able to receive new information. Greed and attachments make the mind dark and unable to see in the darkness. Hookups and dates won't make you happy. Honesty, frugality, and diligence will. When we don't lie, our minds become bright.
/r/seduction02/09/19 01:42 PM
2

The neediness or external source of internal completion is a precursor or cause to their disinterest - not the other way around. Woah I never released women could read minds! In all seriousness I don't think me wanting to meet women is the reason I've never met a woman who was interested Well, actually, the fact that you want to, and what you want to give and get from it, is probably the issue. Have you ever been chased by someone and lost attraction to them? What would happen if you were deeply…
/r/seduction02/09/19 01:31 PM
1

Our society acts like “love” is an emotion and “our true selves” are our emotions, but that’s bullshit. Our value lies in what we can do when we are rational, what we’ve learned in our life, what we know how to do, and what we strive to achieve and be when we are clear-headed. Emotions are temporary and fleeting; but true love is a rational, credible commitment to your beloved’s well-being. Yes, I agree - well done. 👏 I would like to take this opportunity to contribute the definition of the term…
/r/TheRedPill11/04/17 06:04 PM
1

I appreciate your kind words. But the question was "what is the essential cause?", not "who are the most powerful or influential people today who are connected to enabling the issue?". The answer to my question is "falsehood ruins people and others when believed", not "government", "power", "money", etc. .
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 03:59 PM
1

Please excuse me for saying so, but your reasoning is flawed. Just because some or even all people who happen to be in government or in power are perpetuating and spreading the issue which is damaging human consciousness it does not mean that (a) they are the ones in charge of the causes of the issue nor that (b) they are the ones who started it nor that (c) the issue's causes are solely originated by the elite or those in power. Judging by the number of downvotes I'm getting and the number of u…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/17 11:36 AM
0

think about what your teachers ... did that encouraged or discouraged in yourself and your own behavior and thought processes Right. But it doesn't seem that those/such teachers are the 'elite' you mention. If this issue has been passed down through generations it cannot be attributed to the control of a specific entity or group of elite. See the confusion? (Will check the vid a little later)
/r/TheRedPill05/04/17 01:10 AM
-2

Agreed, yes, not in her real best interest. I just have one question as I'm very interested to have your opinion/answer... Through what specific/concrete causes and process is that toxic program installed in people? The causes specifically are what I'm more interested in. Thanks in advance.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/17 12:06 AM
1

There might have been a misunderstanding somewhere. I'm not suggesting you should stay with an abusive person. I'm suggesting you might not want to perjure yourself in the process of trying to free yourself.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 10:46 PM
2

Once the funds are in the circular economy of Monero the problem you are suggesting disappears. That's why the important thing is for Monero to be actually used rather than just bought, held, and pumped by price speculators who call themselves investors. But, I digress….
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 07:26 PM
2

Not disclosing a known truth (hiding facts) when you're asked is also lying. The question is, must you pay 50% of the assets you choose to disclose, or 50% of the income you have made. For example, I doubt the IRS would like for you to choose the former. But I've never divorced anyone so I wouldn't know.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 06:03 PM
-2

Cool story bro, but I'm pretty sure it's illegal to lie to a judge. IANAL/TINLA. 🙂
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 05:48 PM
3

And it's also a complete scam designed specifically to rip off lay people. :)
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 03:58 PM
7

That is not the case. Bitcoin is completely traceable, non-private, and is also not fungible like a true currency must be. The IRS is already having bitcoin exchanges like Coinbase report the activity of all users. The only legit (non-scam) and truly private digital currency out there is Monero (visit r / Monero)
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 01:40 PM
1

When you say emotional investment, are you talking about actual love you practiced for her (such as teaching), or are you talking about an attachment / affection that you have, i.e. idealism? One thing to remember is that when people purchase stocks with the intent of selling them at a profit (or doing the same effective thing with options, et al) they are actually engaging in speculation… not investment.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/17 08:03 PM
1

Could you make your question more concrete or point out any problem you found? Even a master of the world would not be able to give a specific answer to a vague question. :)
/r/TheRedPill14/02/17 09:24 PM
3

The only single issue I see with this is his usage of the term "philosophy". Every philosophy which causes the results he refers to is "deteriorated philosophy" – the generation of logic with no way to verify existing axioms or tell if you have forgotten any lost axioms – rather than real philosophy – how we study and how we reveal the truth of matters. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. It would preclude exactly what Pook is doing in his passage. To achieve the spiritual purity he ref…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/17 06:02 PM
1

This proved to be delightful. That's what I like to hear. ☺️
/r/TheRedPill23/01/17 06:22 PM
1

By aligning with the Highest Consciousness one The Original Source of consciousness. That's not really an answer to my question. But I'm just going to continue on the arrogant assumption you're saying consciousness is generated only by the creator of this universe. I'd just rather people know that that is not true. A creator or originator of a thing always stays at its starting point or center. The creator may be totally pure consciousness like you say, and may be worried about humans. But that …
/r/TheRedPill23/01/17 06:08 PM
1

Reality is the underlying essence of all existence. By aligning with the Highest Consciousness one can see that all of Humanity is in a state of mental bondage by way of deception. So do you mean to say that in reality the Consciousness determines the operations of everything in the world? For example Christians sometimes use the term, "the author of a life". A species can't suddenly become another species. A duck is a duck. Yes, I agree. The reason is that they have their own origins of life. I…
/r/TheRedPill23/01/17 05:41 PM
1

The absolute Reality and Source of the Highest Consciousness from wence everything in existence stems from. Okay, so, what exists in reality? What can you see from the level of the Consciousness you refer to? instead of abiding by the framework set What framework do you mean? I'm looking for the exactly correct teaching itself. we were deceived into believing that we can govern and control ourselves independent of IT'S influence. Do you believe in evolution? If one is under the influence of Trut…
/r/TheRedPill23/01/17 04:50 PM
2

A void that can only be satisfied by the pursuit of Truth What is the [definition or referent of the term] Truth? consistent upright behavior Where is the line / how do you tell the difference between upright behavior which will have a good result and upright behavior which comes from an attachment to right and good? Edit: clarification
/r/TheRedPill23/01/17 02:07 PM
2

What's next is (a) learning what is in reality to become able to contribute to others and human society (e.g. by teaching), and (b) gaining your unique abilities to diagnose problems and to save the lives of those whose own selves are in danger. You have to "hit the road" searching for those who have kept themselves truthful enough to understand the truth (the one in a million), in order to switch from performing only affection (a lesser duty) to performing love (a greater duty).
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 06:48 PM
1

Meditation teaches you how to accept your thoughts for what they are But how do you verify you are aware of them as they really are?
/r/TheRedPill25/12/16 02:06 PM
7

Sounds like she lied because she was scared of you leaving her. Captainship mistake on your side perhaps. To my eye it seems you would benefit from mending that mistake. Honesty is the key.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/16 12:38 PM
1

Of course, Socrates wasn't exactly welcomed by his own wife. That's because he was truthful and a real philosopher. Untruthful people can hardly bear to be around truthful people because the truthful illuminate the falsehood in the other person. But even though it's the case that he lived for himself and wasn't treated so well by his wife, it doesn't mean that he promulgated the things you are saying. In fact I have to inform you that you've just taken Socrates' words and interpreted it to your …
/r/TheRedPill08/10/16 01:40 PM
5

Her behavior doesn't exactly constitute being a good mother. After all, she is lying to them, degrading and attempting to remove their relationship with their father figure, and using them as the objects of her attachments.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/16 01:25 PM
2

I suggest going and approaching many more, other women. Forget about your wife for now. She doesn't respect you much at the moment, and you must have let it get that way for a while. So just focus on fulfilling your own needs and set the condition that you won't engage with her and won't give her what she is extracting out of you – things like comfort/security and your validation of her via your continuous expressions of interest in her – unless she respects you. You don't need to tell her that …
/r/MarriedRedPill06/05/16 04:06 PM
2

What is love? We need a very concrete and accurate definition. Otherwise, there will be no one who can learn, from what you teach, to distinguish love (which makes things change the better) from affection, which originates from attachment (which invariably makes things change for the worse).
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 12:54 AM
1

Being able to get commitment-free sex might be a necessary condition but isn't a sufficient condition to consider a person a real alpha, even if it's something real alphas are able to do. That's why it's often said here that neither a "Chad" nor a person who must resort to various dark triad traits are true alphas. The former rides on the coattails of their natural traits and abilities while remaining ignorant, and the latter is just able to trick others into doing something wrong using techniqu…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/16 02:40 PM
-2

I don't need to deny what you say. Notice you said "try to be". The meaning of the fact you replied is that you are leading or attempting to lead. So you are in danger of contradicting yourself. And I did not comment on females. So you have no grounds or basis to back up your claim that I comment on cultural roles. Edit: The issue is the difference between the ideal and the reality. To improve, awaken from your idealism.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 03:21 PM
-1

Not having relationships doesn't make someone an "alpha". In fact living in such a way is merely due to the person's own obstacles, limitations, and internalized falsehoods. Leadership and truthfulness do make one an alpha. And MGTOW and Alpha are not mutually exclusive. The foundation of being a true man is made up of three things. Live for your true self, work hard and bear burdens, and practice true love for yourself and others by not lying and instead delivering a good teaching to the world.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 01:50 PM
20

In math, the problem (question) is the very source of the answer.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/16 02:15 PM
1

The quality of answers is determined by the quality of questions. Similarly, changing oneself for the better is possible by making good problems for oneself.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 12:46 AM
1

You mentioned you apologize now only when doing something wrong. By what criterion (or with what standard) do you distinguish right from wrong?
/r/MarriedRedPill28/02/16 07:26 PM
1

Basically, there was a particular truth that Jesus tried to teach people, but he was killed before being able to realize it completely for others. Nowadays, his words have been changed much, many core/foundational things have been redacted or simply not recorded, and you won't find a clear and proper definition of the term "truth" as Jesus taught it. If you genuinely want to know, Jesus taught people how a good thing and how a bad thing happen in life. As for what he would have taught you, I don…
/r/MarriedRedPill28/02/16 06:45 PM
0

What I would like to ask you is what you obtain through modern Christianity. If you follow people who have not had the teachings necessary to bless your life, then that is also a beta behavior. I believe Jesus was a savior and a true man, and since you do too, you should know that it means the modern Christianity does not pass down the real teaching of Jesus. You will become more your own man and a leader if you try to learn and pass on the real teaching of Christ rather than following ministers…
/r/MarriedRedPill28/02/16 03:20 PM
1

Are you sure it's commitment and not that you were not captaining properly?
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 06:47 AM
1

Answers reside in questions. In order for me to give you a specific and useful answer I'll need your specific and concrete question.
/r/RedPillWomen10/02/16 02:34 AM
1

A shit test is a kind of fitness test, often used to ascertain someone's mating fitness or relative social standing. Another sort of fitness test is known as a comfort test. But aside from these, given your mention of anger, I think it might be important for you to distinguish trouble made as a fitness test and stress which is actually caused by some unaddressed issue or mistakes in the relationship. In my personal view, both males and females need to practice appropriate honesty in order to dis…
/r/RedPillWomen10/02/16 01:19 AM
0

Wall A man who opens his eyes sees the blind; The blind can not see a man who opens his eyes. Result An ignorant person comes to lose the self; A man who does not make an effort comes to lose the world.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 09:28 PM
1

Of the world. Or of enlightenment.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 06:09 AM
1

Thanks for saying so. The term God is badly misunderstood in modern society (e.g. conflation of objects), or, its range of referenced objects gets insufficiently defined prior to attempting conversation, causing wrong conclusions. If I can be of service to your good life, let me know. I was trained by a master and opened my eyes to see reality, even if it is only a little, whereas others are totally blind without their realization. All answers lie in their questions when we see the questions on …
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 03:07 PM
1

By that definition, a man could come up with arbitrary expectations and call it unfair that they don't come to pass.
/r/MarriedRedPill27/01/16 02:35 PM
1

I would like to explain and define it by example. The state of death can be seen in the fact that a fruit (like an apple) which separates from its parent tree can never go back and rejoin the tree. However, the fruit contains the origin (seed) of the tree through which the tree can come to life again, even if the parent tree dies. In that way, the tree makes itself exist perpetually through its own life activities to produce its own origin through its life. Humans obviously don't bear fruits, bu…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 01:50 PM
1

How do you define "fair"? Would you say that math is fair in the way it strictly yields specific results for a given problem?
/r/MarriedRedPill27/01/16 01:25 PM
4

Indeed. The very definition of human nature is that the individual can distinguish what they should do from what they shouldn't. People in this modern era are losing or have lost their human nature because modern society is already conquered by falsehood. Lying to hide things or change the truth may seem to the blind to have short term benefits but it results in their destruction and the destruction of their relationships, society, country, and world.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 12:57 PM
3

Loving - yes, the "L" word. She has the capacity for love. To give it and accept it. To crave it. Women who cannot love are broken women. I do agree and have proof of its existence. But what is "love", exactly? How does it differ from "affection" which you so aptly described? Excellent work on your post. More to the point, forget reading a book. Look at your life, and the relationships you have personally had. Spot on.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 08:29 PM
1

Situationally, yes, it happens sometimes. Thus, I become aware of my imperfections through my genuine efforts. Such is not to be disincentivized because of a singular apparently unfavorable outcome. However your advice about tact has not fallen upon deaf ears. Thanks
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 05:09 PM
1

But I am not an atheist. Actually, it was quite relevant. I asked the kind of questio Jesus could have asked of the pharisees in order to avoid being killed for telling the truth. I was treated similarly but avoided death. Thus I was arming the OP with my own questions. But whether it will be good or bad for him depends on his treatment of those questions. I made a tiny mistake in my tone. But that is not what you originally critiqued me for.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 04:03 PM
1

You're right. I have brashly been making the intentional mistake of considering this a forum for arbitrary self-improvement. If my question had been red-pill-specific, would you feel the same way?
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 03:57 PM
1

How do you get to know someone as they really are without talking real shit with them? That is my very point. :) And I agree with everything else you said.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 03:41 PM
1

I agree and I'll do my best to keep your advice in mind. But, suppose I never showed myself to others. They would have no idea that I have something which can save them. It's similar to how a drug addict will only view a healthy individual as implicitly different, a person who simply doesn't understand nor has had to undergo what they've been through. They presume such people would fail in their own circumstances. People hear what they want to hear. And in the same way, like you noted, people's …
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 03:09 PM
1

It seems a sacrifice of my SMV but what I do actually makes me change for the better over time. It breaks my false self (i.e. internalized falsehoods) and awakens my ignorance when I witness the world's reaction to true love. And as for reputation, those who are truthful recognize the truth and respond with delight to it. It's only those who are untruthful who feel it bitter and have to ridicule it. Lao-tzu said the same. What I do actually reveals whose opinions I have to care about. By the way…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 02:27 PM
1

I appreciate your note. However I recognize others' view of me. It's the price I pay and burden I shoulder in order to be able to deliver my truth to the world. I am slightly different from others in that I have been taught the truth by an enlightened being. Very few people were able to meet him, much less actually be able to understand him. So I do this work for the world regardless of the fact that people in the present do not know me. However I thank you for your note as it tells me something…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 02:17 PM
5

It happens because those who gathered around and tried to listen to Jesus had a huge gap in level of consciousness between themselves and him, and so they couldn't understand him properly nor transmit his actual teaching. Instead they changed the teaching as they attempted to transmit it. It's like a game of telephone or xeroxing a xerox. It happened in Buddhism too. If the truth Buddha saw and taught was like a fresh apple, then eating it is very nourishing to oneself. But by its meaning being …
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 12:32 PM
-2

One question at a time buddy. Or were you hoping I wouldnt notice your machiavellian attempt at a rhetorical diversion of attention from the validity of my question? you know, the fact you had to do that is very telling.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 02:50 AM
1

Haha what luck! I suspected you'd say that. Since we're bursting bubbles, how about this one? I ask this question to neurologists I meet. Given that brain function is necessary for the expression of and our third-party observation of consciousnesses, and given that we observe a diminishment in the expression of functions of consciousness when the brain receives trauma, how could you distinguish between the brain being what generates the consciousness from the brain being the thing which transmit…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 02:11 AM
0

It's a buffer (coping mechanism). People who deny that the world exists after death repress what they have to experience as a result of their own actions even while they are alive.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 10:34 PM
1

Haha so what is one example from this incredible amount of evidence that "nothing happens"? You only need to share one piece of proof of that negative for it to be sufficient. This will be funny..
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 10:33 PM
-3

My questions may have been direct and you may identify or associate your value with a particular answer to the questions, but how could you judge and confirm (with what proof) that they are intended to beat someone rather than being an act of true love to bless their life?
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 06:09 PM
0

Can anyone recognize the man who was downvoted for telling people the truth about religions?
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 04:22 PM
1

what do you obtain from the church? do they have teaching for human beings or do they borrow the name of god to carry out their activities?
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 03:28 PM
1

Doesn't the sensible man want what is in his own best interest?
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 10:30 PM
3

Perhaps I misunderstand SMV but I thought it was additive--if one has an undesirable quality it detracts from the sum. So despite being hot a toxic person remains perceived as a cause of concern and obstacle to relations to the sensible individual. If I misunderstand I would appreciate your guidance.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 10:28 PM
1

So you are deciding and promulgating that consciousness exists and is real, right?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 08:10 PM
1

Can you make it simpler for me with a more concentrated answer? Was my question not exact enough? I'm not that advanced.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 08:00 PM
1

Does consciousness exist or does it not exist?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 07:49 PM
2

After reading carefully and understanding I'm more confused. You said you can "completely immerse" yourself in the moment. But your explanation changed from complete immersion to selective immersion. Ok, let's look at selective immersion. You said you can keep focused on what you believe truly matters. What is the/your criteria to distinguish or measure the importance of matters? Is it alright that I ask you questions? Some people don't like it. I'm not asking to bring you on a tangent. You sugg…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 07:25 PM
1

You said that you can immerse yourself into a moment. Can you explain to me what you mean by that?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 07:10 PM
1

If you are truly living for yourself why do you expend your own energy shining for others? The light doesn't accomplish anything practical in your own life. Are you sure you understand your reasoning completely?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 07:03 PM
1

If a woman looks at, learns from, and follows a person who shines a light in her eyes, it will only make her blind. The true enlightened beings in our history never told others their own thoughts or opinions. They said they simply see and reveal 'what is' in reality. It means what is in life. Their teaching was always within common sense and they never spoke without seeing the problems first. We can't get an answer without a problem. The problem is the very source of the answer. Try to keep this…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 06:56 PM
1

So, you've said "everything vibrates". Does the law itself vibrate? Does it change at all, ever? Does the law of nature exist in nature? The answer to the first question is no. The second question's answer is yes. That means there's a contradiction in your understanding of the truth. However, the truth is perfectly self-consistent and also always has points that can be verified with facts. What you say cannot be verified because it contains no actual problems (questions). You are in real danger …
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 06:49 PM
2

I believe this is the correct answer. Being alpha includes leadership and if you want your woman to be able to admit her own mistakes you have to be able to do so honestly and with courage as well. If you don't, and make other mistakes like giving criticism, she will lose faith that you actually have her back and will stand by her if she has made a mistake. For that reason, use your retraction of validation to remove positive incentivization of bad behavior. Many people's ultimatums and desperat…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 02:25 AM
1

You cannot respect that of which you are unaware. Am I incorrect in understanding that the construction and interpretation of Bell's postulations require the tools with which we model and deal with particles? If so, what tools are those, and how have they been confirmed?
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 07:17 PM
1

Thanks for the considered reply. However, it seems you're still making a leap, as your conclusion presupposes that classical QM has been proven to be complete and true, which is a requirement for it to be the same as the law that operates the real universe. But I'm not aware that such a thing has been done. If it has, I'll have further questions for you, as that will be a big surprise to me. Perhaps I'm missing something as it sounds like you know your stuff. Edit: I just wanted to clarify my ar…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/16 04:44 PM
1

Could you elaborate on the provability of the world being fundamentally probabilistic?
/r/TheRedPill13/01/16 03:28 PM
1

Any questions or problems in life you would like answered? Maybe I can find something from my studies.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 11:18 PM
2

Exactly. One profound fact is that the body of a healthy organism is homeostatic - it seeks balance. But any such self-regulating mechanism needs to be able to generate enough power and control to counteract the imbalance it's fighting. Strength is key. By the way, I read some of your comments. You seem like a good dude.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 05:34 PM
1

Excellent post. Just one comment about living in "now/what is" vs "what was". Have you heard that one reason people procrastinate is a slavery-like mentality that prevents them from seeing a future in which they win? Or in other words they don't identify with their future self. Maybe as a buffer/coping mechanism. The answer to such a problem is for the perceived "master" to tell the procrastinator that they are free to do whatever they want. The subsequent realization is that their own future li…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 05:21 PM
2

I'm not sure without more information. You may like to get examined by a PT or MD. You may have injured yourself, e.g. by tearing something, and your muscles are holding you in that position in order to avoid loading the damaged tissue. Or you may be training improperly, such as deadlifting without properly setting your spine and scapulae. Bet there are lots of possibilities. Try to trace the cause by looking at the facts.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 04:18 AM
1

How do you explain natural law to a well trained student of ancient philosophy, modern science, or mathematics?
/r/TheRedPill09/01/16 03:08 AM
1

Don't forget about metabolic syndrome.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/16 12:16 AM
0

And then he proceeds to tell him...
/r/TheRedPill08/01/16 03:00 PM
1

It would be much better for your life if you were able to admit that you do not actually know.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/16 04:48 PM
1

Using your definition, what distinguishes love from any other form of higher consciousness? What makes love, love?
/r/TheRedPill06/01/16 04:30 PM
1

What do you indicate by the term, "love"?
/r/TheRedPill06/01/16 04:11 PM
1

What do you indicate by the term truth?
/r/TheRedPill03/01/16 12:35 AM
1

You sure came a long way for "not worth your effort". But I can tell that your words are not true much more simply - by the mere fact you responded, and negatively. The oppositional reaction you have in you when you hear the truth is the very problem of this modern world.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/16 12:23 AM
1

I'm sorry for how you feel. However, when you accuse a man of a crime, shouldn't you be able to describe the crime? Or define it concretely? I have the courage to stand trial. When you define it I will be able to tell you whether or not it's true about me.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/16 10:00 PM
1

My learnings and wisdom tell me to be cautious of replying to you. But it's something I'll do for myself. No, the issue is not efficiency. The issue is that if someone were to follow what you taught them they would not be able to do true science. In other words, like I have said plainly, the issue is that you didn't learn the correct definition yet. If you doubt me, let's verify it together. If you don't want to verify your knowledge, you ought not to claim that you know such things. Saying what…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/16 09:44 PM
1

If I ask a math teacher to define math they will define math. If I ask a language teacher to tell me of the definition of language they can also do so. Why? Because they learned it from someone who really knows. If a person can see something as it is they can speak about it as it is. If a person cannot or has not actually seen things, they cannot describe them. When a person is silent in the face of a good and fair question there's one reason why they do not answer: they don't know.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/16 09:22 PM
1

I'm quite pleased to hear you're trained in science, as now we can converse properly. May I ask your specialty/major? I agree with the conclusions derived from much of what you said, but I can't help but speak the fact that even though you have learned various terms, you don't yet have full understandings of them. If you don't like that I maintain this viewpoint, or, if you're interested in confirming and perfecting your understanding of what I'm claiming here, I have some basic questions to mak…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/16 08:01 PM
1

I'm not sure what you're actually replying to from what I myself said. But I will tell you that you're talking about a specialty of mine. Gravity is not able to be identified and modeled with Newtonian gravitation nor even the stress-energy tensor of special relativity, even though they each cover a range of cases. Gravity is not generated by mass. It's generated by the activities of things. In other words, flux of energy density. The area of research of the Higgs boson is concerning mass, not t…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/16 04:39 PM
2

I learned that I don't need any special motivation nor even special training of discipline because I know what I am doing and why I live. Meaning, if you know life, you can live well and cause life to be pleasurable. If you try to live without knowing life, it causes the life to exhaust itself.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/16 05:48 AM
1

Hi there, I wasn't going to reply at first but decided to give it a shot. In religious 'teachings', there are always commandments or precepts. Commandments, i.e. orders, rules, and so-called man-made "laws", are no the same thing as a principle of physics or a principle in philosophy. A principle means that something is determined. However, in commandments, there are answers of what to do, but there are no problems (i.e. questions/issues/matters), and therefore, there is no way (of life) through…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 11:51 PM
1

Suppose I told you that all true natural laws can be reduced to a single fundamental principle?
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 05:46 PM
2

Very interesting to see somebody mention the law of nature here. I'd like to take this opportunity to ask you to define the term for us. What do you mean by Natural Law?
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 05:30 PM
1

Happiness is the life in which one isn't hungry, lonely, nor worried. The conditions which need to be fulfilled in order to produce such a life are frugality, honesty, and diligence. Once these things are made truly alive in one's own life, happiness comes into being in oneself.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 09:44 PM
1

Since you mentioned philosophy I find grounds to continue to ask you questions, although I think you might not like me if I do so here as my basic questions can reveal what you are not actually yet aware of. Are you willing to see such things? If so, I'd like to mention that you didn't answer my question about Enlightenment. We call something an 'enlightenment' as the word has a certain special meaning. By example, I could prove my point perfectly through asking you what you come to learn, obtai…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 02:55 PM
2

What do you mean by Enlightenment?
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 05:09 AM
1

In western psychology, the term attachment is often used to indicate a bond or relationship between people. For example when children don't form a proper bond with at least one of their parents as young children, they're often seen to develop issues later in life, such as that which is termed an "attachment disorder". But I'm using the term attachment with a completely different meaning. Rather than being a good thing, attachment is bad. It can be defined as tying your mind to something that can…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 04:18 PM
2

You sound like a well grounded individual. Congratulations on recovering yourself! That said, will you be receptive if I present you with a dissenting opinion on your usage of the term "love"? You said that it's a female construct. I must disagree there, and am taking the time to do so here because "love" is such a hugely important term in human life. Why so? Because if we don't know love, we don't truly live. Nowadays, in this modern world, people don't distinguish between love and attachment. …
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 04:59 PM
2

Buddhism means Buddha's teaching. My agony as a real truthseeker is that the modern Buddhism doesn't transmit Buddha's real teaching. They always say things like "Buddha taught meditation, four noble truths, eight fold path, and the precepts". Such things promise answers (results/effects). The problem is that in those words, there are no questions (problems) which can be confirmed, and therefore, there are no ways to the answers which are promised. Therefore, it's not and cannot be Buddha's teac…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 04:55 PM
2

Those are monks' words. Of course they would want to "kill" Buddha if they saw him. (The point that this is a so-called metaphorical suggestion is not lost on me. The problem is that the effect of teaching such a thing to people is very real.) Now, why would they tell people to kill a Buddha? It's not just the matter of killing their own pre-conceptions. Suppose a real Buddha came to this world. Who would be the most afraid of him? The monks. Their ability to deceive other people into thinking t…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 04:47 PM
2

The other thing is that if you show me any of the Dalai Lama's words that you think show he knows something, I'll be able to check if they're Buddha's teaching or not, as I know it. I'll explain the proof in such a manner as you can confirm it, and my explanation will also be "falsifiable" (except it won't be disproven because it will be true).
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 01:28 PM
2

By the way my guess is you're more truthful and consequently more self aware than the Dalai Lama. The monks in the modern world are honestly worse than almost any general people. They're nuts about lying to others.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 01:22 PM
1

He's not self aware as you suggest, but he uses Buddha's name to convince ordinary people that he knows something. But we've visited him and he didn't even want to open his door to meet us. Why? He was afraid that his falsehoods would be revealed. He doesn't know even half of one of Buddha's real teachings. I can prove this if you want to travel there with me. A truly self aware man? I hope you have a genuine intention to know! I'll be very lucky to have found you today, if so. Have a look at th…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 01:19 PM
2

You are describing blind men, not a truly self aware man. The society where you live is already conquered by falsehood, which is why you are surrounded by such people and because you are easily influenced by what is in your environment due to your weakened will and level of ignorance of your true self, you consider it the norm in this modern world that people in general are ruined. But that does not make a human implicitly ruined. It will serve your own best interests to confirm my words with in…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 02:22 AM
1

Having apparent human physiology does not automatically grant you the ability to act like a real human being rather than merely a common animal which follows its instict. To have the nature of a human being means that one can differentiate what one should do from what one shouldn't do. By the way, these words are not for you, but for myself, and for the other human beings here.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 02:13 AM
3

Actually there is a good answer. It's "case by case judgement of the results made by behavioral choices, according to the law of cause and effect". How sure are you that saying "there is no answer" is not a buffer of yours because you didn't learn the answer until now and can't see the world according to the law of cause and effect? Be more careful of what you teach others. Likely you're using it to reinforce your own beliefs.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/15 12:10 AM
-1

The term 'Truth' (capital T) means the fundamental law by which all phenomena appear and change. It's simple to learn in the same way that you can learn the formula in math without learning calculus, but the law of the world can't be understood by someone who isn't true enough. To actually see things of the world according to the law is another matter. How well you can do so is a function of your degree of truthfulness.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/15 03:39 PM
1

Hi, Would you mind if I share my opinion with you? I believe only a chipping away of it in all its various forms is possible, an idea of complete apprehension and comprehension of truth is as impossible as the conception of infinity Firstly, it may come as a surprise to you, but I agree with the general notion that an individual's ability to see the truth in 100% of cases is just like attempting to approach an infinity. But there's a very important point that you're missing which I'd like to con…
/r/TheRedPill29/08/15 01:29 PM
0

All good words and pieces of advice. But the term "consciousness", and further, the mention of the "real truth" functioned like bait to me. As I have actually opened my eyes to see, if only a little bit, it's my duty to say here that while some truths have been expounded, including in this very post, there's still quite a huge gap between those truths and the real Truth. The Truth reveals and explains EVERYTHING in the world, not just one or two pertinent matters. It's easy enough for me to say …
/r/TheRedPill29/08/15 03:55 AM
1

In a manner of speaking, yes. PHP is an "interpreted" language so there is some precompiled code that is interpreting and running your own PHP code. The interpeter comprises a "runtime" which performs the actual flow of the program according to the instructions dictated by your PHP.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/15 12:26 AM
2

Gotcha. So what you're doing here is known as a recursive traversal. In other words, you're recursively traversing (traveling through) the tree structure which is rooted at '$path'. This '$path' serves as the initial input to the function dirToArray. What happens therein is that you're iterating (looping without recursion) through the $scanArray - for each $element, you're checking if it's a relevant file, or if it's a a sub-directory. If it's a relevant file, you're accumulating that file in $a…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 12:20 AM
1

Hi there, Any answer needs a question/problem, so if it's possible, would you be able to formulate any sorts of questions for me to answer? No need to worry about cleaning up the code or anything. It might not even be necessary to send it my way. But if we do need to reference the code, the plaintext ought to be totally fine. Can't imagine myself needing to set up the whole environment and run it except if you weren't able to run/debug it.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 08:34 PM
2

Been looking for that file for a long time. Might be about time to give up. I've a question or two for you. And I figured I'd bring this up, and particularly, in public, because I was under the impression that people here, especially those "endorsed" individuals, were more genuine than others and had some capacity for self-reflection. After all, there's more to being "alpha" than just killing other people who could steal your woman. My question is, do you really believe it's a good idea for your…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 05:54 PM
2

I have to respectfully disagree with you, sir. I believe your semantics are a little too imprecise and may lead to misunderstanding among the ignorant. Suppose the outcome that I am looking for is self-betterment? In such a case, the process of my practice looks like self-investment. Such a thing constitutes living for oneself. But if I don't live for myself, but live for others instead, then it means that I'm not going to be investing in myself, but rather a non-self outcome, thus depleting the…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 01:50 AM
12

I'm an expert programmer. Is there something specific you wanted to know? Recursion is very simple when you learn it from someone who really knows.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/15 07:02 AM
1

Which war have you been to?
/r/TheRedPill02/08/15 04:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter