TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

englad Archive

View 3 posts and 287 comments by englad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Capitalism doesn't let other systems try, that's why the US is constantly overthrowing other governments. The video production in that video is perfectly fine btw, and even if it was horribly produced doesn't mean anything on it is any less true
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/19 02:44 PM
2

It's not at all predicated on that, see my other comment
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/19 02:24 PM
0

inequality is inherent to capitalism, because the capitalists, the investors who supply financial capital to businesses in exchange for equity take an ever-larger slice of the economic pie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67HfnfLYr7U is also a good video on the labour theory of value/ law of value and https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/12/capitalism-isnt-working-thomas-piketty is a good article
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/19 01:36 PM
0

Capitalism doesn't reward working hard, it rewards exploitation of others; Who earns more under capitalism? The person spending 14 hours a day, every day working in a sweatshop making jeans, or the CEO? and which works harder?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/19 01:06 PM
-4

Capitalism requires people to be poor, and struggling.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/19 12:47 PM
1

Being nice to people is good, regardless of which way it is, it's not expected, never seen anyone act entitled about not having a seat that isn't disabled or with a child
/r/MensRights08/11/18 12:52 PM
2

Of course it is
/r/MensRights08/11/18 12:51 PM
1

or you want to do something nice for someone wtf
/r/MensRights08/11/18 12:05 PM
6

Only a household name to Americans
/r/MensRights25/10/18 06:49 AM
1

you're moving the goal posts now
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:36 PM
1

It's hardly intimidating to have to get up and go outside
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:30 PM
1

read what I said before, I thought we were still on the topic of pressing a fire alarm
/r/MensRights18/09/18 03:08 PM
1

I didn't see the breaking the windows bit, thought you were stil talking about the fire alarm being pulled
/r/MensRights18/09/18 01:03 PM
-2

I have no idea who they are so don't know if they desrve it or not
/r/MensRights18/09/18 12:39 PM
-2

Calm down kid
/r/MensRights18/09/18 12:06 PM
-14

With no proof it's the truth, especially the first bit about an event that hasn't even happened, gonna go with paranoia
/r/MensRights18/09/18 10:23 AM
-15

You sound incredibly paranoid
/r/MensRights18/09/18 10:15 AM
-1

bollocks.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:11 PM
1

he didn't just target very old, just old peopel in general
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:12 PM
0

You made a few posts/comments stating. The most obvious things ever and that makes you not a troll?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 08:28 PM
1

Lmao you're a joke
/r/MensRights17/08/18 08:23 PM
1

imagine using bing definition
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:50 PM
-1

Not trying to be imaginitive, original, or witty, it's clear from your comment history your just some troll
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:50 PM
-1

Ah, looked at your post history, now I get it. You're just a troll
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:25 PM
1

There really isn't as much as you're imagining. gaslight ˈɡaslʌɪt/ verb gerund or present participle: gaslighting manipulate (someone) by psychological means into doubting their own sanity. Please explain how it is gaslighting?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:23 PM
0

There was very little hate except for like one quote, you can submit an article for it, it isn't gaslighting, look up what it means
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:46 PM
-1

Why are you talking like an idiot with weird Z's in places they shouldn't be?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:43 PM
1

Because it's a blog post, and it's not gaslighting, look up what that means.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:36 PM
1

That is her quoting somebody article... She also says: "I think there are situations in which women have more power."
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:24 PM
0

That's a blog post mate, and #MeToo isn't feminist propaganda and what did they say that isn't true?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:15 PM
1

Link please
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:59 PM
1

Any evidence of that?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:51 PM
0

Which one of these say anything about men not being listened too rather than them not talking about it?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:50 PM
1

...Harold Shipmen..
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:37 PM
4

So no source then
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:37 PM
1

lol okay, so 1 female does it and there must be more, 1 male does it and that is it? Vast majority of serial killers are male, vast majority of them target females
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:25 PM
4

Source on that claim that they're raised to think that?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:24 PM
5

Not whataboutism but whatifism now?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:54 PM
0

Do you have any source on the issue being that they're not listening rather than men aren't talking?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:52 PM
-2

At what part do you stop blaming feminism and start blaming the people doing these things? Also harold shipmen killed mostly women and you think he was the only one? really?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:51 PM
1

Any source on that?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 08:03 PM
1

So you think the couple of CPS officers got orders from the heads of the CPS?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:29 PM
2

I don't and again who is "their" in this case?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:24 PM
1

What did I lie about, exactly?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:20 PM
2

Nobody has pointed out any hypocrisy from me here
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:20 PM
2

"they" being? a couple of CPS officers?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:11 PM
0

Nobody said it would
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:11 PM
-1

Not sure what them cases have to do with anyone trying to end males whatsoever
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:04 PM
-3

Why not? it matters what his angle is still.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:02 PM
0

still hilarious that you think trump cares about anything other than his wallet, and please look up radical anything, they all say they'd kill, and the US is full of lots of other radical groups that are more serious
/r/MensRights02/08/18 04:47 PM
-13

What she said is definitely bad, but can we all just take a minute to look at OPs comments in this thread, comparing all women hitler, he thinks they're trying to kill off every man which is frankly hilarious and thinking trump is our only hope lmao
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:06 PM
4

lol
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:02 PM
1

Can't find anything about this other than this 1 article, any other source?
/r/MensRights21/07/18 02:06 PM
3

Not as opposed to anything just the daily mail is untrustworthy, they've flat out lied lots of times and hacked dead kids phones etc
/r/MensRights09/07/18 09:54 PM
3

Daily Mail is not a trustworthy source.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 06:40 PM
2

They have no idea whether you intend to use it as that or not, nor is it their job to know, that's for the courts to decide, this law is done on a case-by-case basis
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:21 PM
2

the law states you must have good reason, not that you can't use it for self-defence, it just doesn't consider self-defence a good reason Prohibition of the carrying of offensive weapons without lawful authority or reasonable excuse. (1)Any person who without lawful authority or reasonable excuse, the proof whereof shall lie on him, has with him in any public place any offensive weapon shall be guilty of an offence, and shall be liable— (a)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not ex…
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:07 PM
0

The point you are missing is that you are actively breaking the law if you do this
/r/MensRights06/07/18 12:09 PM
3

That's not true, you have to have a good reason to carry it, not just any reason other than self defence
/r/MensRights06/07/18 12:08 PM
1

you're literally commenting about an ad on an ad, I think you do see ads
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:46 PM
2

it's a mobile game, probably plays it on breaks from work
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:46 PM
2

Not every girl goes out with friends every time she's out, some have to walk home from work late at night too and I said plenty of women have to walk down streets, not that most women get raped.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 12:11 PM
2

Yeah, getting murdered is worrying, and men are definitely murdered more than women, but I don't think most men fear rape other than ones who are going to prison
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:05 AM
1

assaulted not raped though, and plenty of women have to walk down streets at night after doing whatever, work, clubbing, having a night out with friends
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:03 AM
-3

Kind of a different thing to worrying about being raped when walking down the street and worrying about it when you go prison
/r/MensRights14/06/18 06:59 PM
-8

Maybe some men fear rape, but I don't think that's a very common fear amongst men
/r/MensRights14/06/18 04:57 PM
1

This is retarded, I propose a better solution; Schlee for Him, Schler for her, Schlimself, Schlerself, etc.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:10 PM
2

I'm saying they harm women all the time and the media doesn't get in a frenzy any more than when they do it to men
/r/MensRights22/10/16 10:49 PM
-1

they harm both all the time
/r/MensRights22/10/16 10:11 PM
-10

Because a lot of what ISIS do is for publicity? They execute people in horrific ways while releasing videos with cheesy special effects so it makes news
/r/MensRights22/10/16 09:45 PM
-11

Not good that they're executed, good the media is largely being silent
/r/MensRights22/10/16 09:35 PM
-22

Good? this is a good thing
/r/MensRights22/10/16 06:50 PM
1

Ouy of curiosity do you have any sources of it being kainly women who start it but men gets punished for hitting back?
/r/MensRights15/09/16 03:25 PM
2

You can be attracted to someone without objectifying them
/r/MensRights10/08/16 01:20 PM
5

FWIW, we have sentenced 10 year olds to prison in England before now
/r/MensRights05/04/16 06:30 PM
-16

It is if everyone does it because they cant change it instantaneously
/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:48 AM
-26

that's ridiculous, you're going to try put places out of business for having poor toilet facilities
/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:22 AM
1

As did everyone who downvoted me, and 99% of this thread I would wager
/r/MensRights27/12/15 08:49 PM
2

The post of police and crime commissioner should not be confused with the police rank of "Commissioner", held by the chief police officers for the Metropolitan Police Service and the City of London Police, which cover the two police areas in London.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 07:18 PM
-2

She can't arrest anyone
/r/MensRights25/12/15 08:20 PM
-4

title makes her seem more important than she is, and its only for Northumbria
/r/MensRights25/12/15 04:51 PM
1

Statutory rape is a feminist mind trap wat
/r/MensRights23/12/15 09:34 AM
1

Yours is about death by fall etc, your title is about murdered
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:54 AM
3

still works, just not on mobiles apparently
/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:56 AM
2

What religion is that? You do realise female doctors aren't goddesses right? why would it matter what your GPs gender is?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:35 AM
19

her age.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:11 PM
1

Right, but not the journalist/author of the article
/r/MensRights21/01/15 06:23 PM
20

You hate the guardian because one person left a retarded comment? The article its self doesn't blame the father
/r/MensRights21/01/15 12:56 PM
3

it doesn't glorify abusing men at all if you look at the lyrics
/r/MensRights08/12/14 05:34 AM
4

i like her music, theyre great to listen too, she has a good tone
/r/MensRights07/12/14 10:21 PM
-2

Then your eyes need adjusting.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 07:31 AM
2

for everyone it is.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 07:44 AM
2

I certainly hope not, that's terrible
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:46 PM
-2

This isn't sensible...
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:54 PM
1

That is about the US media, I don't think the same thing applies to UK
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:06 PM
0

because I don't frivolously sue people?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 10:39 AM
-1

the government, or the police? you think suing guarantees you civil rights?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 10:39 AM
1

Nor is it a propaganda machine, then.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:40 AM
-3

BBC isn't state controlled idiot.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:14 AM
-2

Unless you're financially impacted you should not sue.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 07:32 AM
-2

Unless you're financially impacted you should not sue.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 07:31 AM
1

Amazon Family here in England
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:23 AM
0

And the start demanding that we start dumping billions of dollars into even more women's health care programs to fix this problem. england
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:16 AM
-13

this is the problem with the US, sue everyone for everything
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:14 AM
-1

"Please do my homework for me because I am too lazy to do research." - OP
/r/MensRights12/01/14 12:18 PM
14

"Please do my homework for me." - OP
/r/MensRights12/01/14 12:57 AM
2

misleading title much
/r/MensRights22/12/13 09:46 AM
1

not naked, not child porn
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:38 PM
1

in america**
/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:55 AM
0

equality?
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:55 PM
12

14 page book wrote by a comedian (his other book for sale is called rumpleforeskin
/r/MensRights22/11/13 08:24 AM
1

He can consent by age, the filming and distribution of it is an entirely different thing and not what I was talking about
/r/MensRights12/11/13 06:09 PM
1

Well I guess i'm mistaken. Not rape though.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:32 PM
-6

as she is not a teacher, just an assistant it is fine.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:22 PM
4

but it isn't rape as he was trying to say.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:21 PM
37

Is it really a good thing to be positive about your body when it's an unhealthy weight? mine is, but i'm not happy with it and working on it.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 09:18 AM
4

recklessness is a crime, I think it'd be covered under that
/r/MensRights07/11/13 08:59 PM
1

Can't they press charges for slander and reckless disregard/recklessness?
/r/MensRights07/11/13 08:57 PM
1

they're just closer, the family isn't forced to visit though
/r/MensRights25/10/13 03:41 PM
5

Definitely a good thing, though it's a shame it's not for men too but I don't think anyone would argue it's bad
/r/MensRights25/10/13 03:37 PM
7

I would agree with you. It's sexist but the funds aren't there to make it possible for all male prisoners to move near their families. It's a bit unfair, but definitely is good in the case of children
/r/MensRights25/10/13 08:56 AM
1

Oh, my mistake sorry
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:49 PM
1

of course it isn't, it's the daily mail.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:05 PM
1

as this is England and so is the Daily Mail, Kendall Jenner is 17 and thus not underage.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:04 PM
3

I hate the term privilege and especially combined with "checked" and "unchecked"
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:01 PM
0

there's a huge difference between a lighter sentence and no sentence at all
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:56 AM
1

Still not neccesarily discriminatory, maybe people have been spamming /r/mensrights to that subreddit
/r/MensRights24/07/13 07:55 PM
-1

but men is mentioned in t he article...
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:00 PM
1

what? source?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:59 PM
1

m... i didn't say he could
/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:21 PM
-1

underage yes, no idea about drunk
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:26 PM
-11

If she's drunk she can't consent, if she's underage she can't consent, so in those two cases yes does not mean yes
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:25 PM
1

No, she didn't have to show ID because she is a muslim.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:49 PM
1

I didn't see it saying that
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:26 PM
3

heh, I saw this today on the bus, Mancunians ftw! TL;DR if you do something the woman doesn't want during sex, it's rape. I.E. Not pulling out when you've agreed too.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:12 PM
1

How is it stupid or unreasonable?
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:00 PM
1

Yes it does. He broke the law and had sex with someone too young.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:31 PM
0

link to original post?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:53 PM
-8

Is it that hard to keep your cock in your pants for 1 year? It's the mans fault here.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:49 PM
1

not neccesarily
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:02 AM
22

from all people
/r/MensRights03/04/13 11:47 PM
2

I would hope you'd think "wait, the DM is a source of lies, and paedophilia, why would I post it when I can find a better newspaper link that do deserve ad revenue generated by people visiting the site." (your gender is irrelevant to this)
/r/MensRights08/03/13 10:00 PM
2

You should. It's a newspaper of paedophiles, bigots, royal lovers, and of course the standard lying/bias/etc
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:29 PM
2

I'm not so interested in the article its self, just on stopping people like OP from using it as a source, the daily mail are the shittest newspaper to exist - if you were from England you'd understand.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:24 PM
3

Yeah, maybe. Or it didn't happen how they said it did, or any similar things
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:16 PM
13

Once again, for fuck sake THE DAILY MAIL IS NOT A REPUTABLE SOURCE, THEY ROUTINELY LIE AND EXAGGERATE. THE DAILY MAIL IS NOT A REPUTABLE SOURCE, THEY ROUTINELY LIE AND EXAGGERATE.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:01 PM
2

Why don't wrestling games count?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 10:21 AM
1

We had to do it in my uni class about 3D modelling for articles that were not yet written preferably
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:35 PM
3

In my University we had to write an article for wikipedia (or ammend one) to do with a certain topic
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:37 PM
2

The NHS does not do circumcisions unless for medical reasons or unless you pay the bills.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:07 PM
0

Yes, she walked but it was illegal.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:41 AM
1

what the midwife did was illegal.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:18 AM
1

wrong, as doing it at home is illegal and it must be done by a doctor.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:17 AM
-30

but the US isn't the only place that matters
/r/MensRights09/02/13 04:28 PM
1

It's not neccesarily the person hiring here who is sexist, but if the parents aren't going to feel comfortable leaving a man with the child then his/her business will suffer
/r/MensRights09/02/13 10:31 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bystander_effect
/r/MensRights09/02/13 12:21 AM
3

you are actively engaging a troll. What do you expect?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:07 PM
-4

From last time this was posted: This is a bit of an unfair comparison. Males have a competitive advantage over females due to higher testosterone production. That's a scientific fact. You may not like it but it's true. Males dominate in sports because they're 'doping'. Though they're doing so naturally. If a GIRL enters a sport dominated by men it would be surprising to see that she did well. Because she is a female and either has higher testosterone than average females (which is possible) OR s…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:15 PM
2

TIL people who hold doors open for only women are doing it to get laid
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:51 PM
1

The Daily Mail often do lies and slander too
/r/MensRights01/01/13 01:11 PM
2

indeed, but the /r/mensrights seem to love it, its the UK version of fox news
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:52 AM
42

THE DAILY MAIL IS NOT A VALID SOURCE
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:50 PM
0

Equally as bad perhaps, but nobody tries to use the sun as a source
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:46 PM
0

Name one newspaper worse than the dailymail, and I wasn't arguing about the bias but about the lies.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:36 PM
0

not particularly, the story is unimportant to me just trying to spread the word that the daily mail is ridiculous and should never be used as a source, ask anyone over at /r/unitedkingdom
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:23 PM
-2

Well, it was just the first one I googled, perhaps it was a bad example but there are many.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 08:08 PM
-2

I think that you shouldn't link to the daily mail if you want to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:59 PM
-1

just look at the shit they produce instead; http://brettanderson.co.uk/forum/read.php?3,197004
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:27 PM
-1

I think that's more a failing of men not reporting it
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:33 PM
0

The daily mail is a well known lying newspaper in England
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:32 PM
-2

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/woman-loses-false-rape-claim-appeal-7565336.html and many more, this is just one example. all the ones I know of are from the UK because I only really pay attention to UK crime news, but i'm sure the US has some too
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:31 PM
4

consent is not always consent, if one is so drunk that they cannot even stand then it's taking advantage, same with if one is underage consent doesn't count
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:26 AM
4

Would it be genecide since she was saying kill all men?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:21 AM
10

TIL talking about women is illegal
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:17 AM
0

I've seen the law do something about it plenty of times and read about it in the newspapers too
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:15 AM
-2

4chan has such an ugly colour scheme
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:13 AM
2

IT IS THE FUCKING DAILY MAIL, THEY ARE NOT A CREDIBLE SOURCE FOR ANYTHING
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:06 AM
2

or boy
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:13 AM
1

male brit here, it really isn't that bad, and tax is equal for men and women and given what it goes to (NHS etc) I am happy with it.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:07 PM
1

FWIW, here is a better, none-daily mail source http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/7995844/Judges-told-be-more-lenient-to-women-criminals.html
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:04 PM
0

THE DAILY MAIL IS NOT A VALID SOURCE FOR ANYTHING EVER here is a none-daily mail source; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/7995844/Judges-told-be-more-lenient-to-women-criminals.html
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:03 PM
3

also don't forget brits not wanting to complain or make a scene
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:02 PM
1

/r/serialkillers /r/murder /r/morbidreality
/r/MensRights22/12/12 10:23 PM
0

males are able to get breast cancer too
/r/MensRights18/12/12 12:10 PM
-12

If he did it, he is responsible
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:39 PM
1

a book by a libertarian free market anarchist is your source?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:12 PM
0

The thing is while they would exist they'd cost more. We see currently over 50% of all bankruptcys in America is related to hospital costs, socialism would (has?) fixed that number
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:59 PM
0

police, fire, ambulance, healthcare, public defenders
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:44 PM
-1

It's a net benefit to drive on roads though, or you would have no way to travel same with getting a train, and police, ambulance, doctors, fire brigade.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:31 PM
0

It's mighty convenient if you want to travel to a town though. You benefit if you use them, same as public transport like trains/metrolinks etc.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:16 PM
-1

Roads.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:08 PM
-1

yes, communism/socialism, you already benefit from socialist programs
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:04 PM
6

I don't think feminism has anything to do with communism/socialism, those can be benefits for society as a whole.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:40 PM
2

Same as UK, but it's still a crime and you will be tried for something else that isn't rape but is pretty much the same
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:31 PM
7

It's not the norm in the UK
/r/MensRights29/11/12 04:20 PM
-1

But the problem is they couldn't afford the procedure so they went to a nurse who couldn't do it properly
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:33 PM
11

Not really, because abortions and circumcision are very different
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:36 PM
3

Awesome, thankyou :}
/r/MensRights29/11/12 01:44 PM
4

*The majority of PCT's do not fund routine circumcision or circumcision that is carried out for religious reasons. The NHS mainly funds circumcision that is used to treat a small number of medical conditions (see below). In such cases, circumcision is usually regarded as a "treatment of last resort", when all other treatment options have failed.* (Source)[http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Circumcision/Pages/Introduction.aspx]
/r/MensRights29/11/12 01:26 PM
6

I don't think it's covered on the NHS anymore unless it's medically required
/r/MensRights29/11/12 01:03 PM
2

happens all the time in the UK
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:49 AM
1

they have no evidence it was muslims
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:48 AM
1

mine did!
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:46 AM
0

still gay
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:43 AM
2

or any other race of male...
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:25 PM
5

please can you explain what that means?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:25 PM
4

1942 - being forced to the army and beig given an essential death sentence
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:21 PM
1

There is not enough houses there for every living person in the US.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:46 PM
1

what the fuck is the le in brackets for?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:45 PM
-1

rent where I live is $576/mo
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:21 PM
-4

It's unlikely being slapped in the face would make you hit the accelerator + clutch, maybe turn the wheel but if you're not accelerating then turning the wheel doesn't matter anyway.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:16 PM
-4

The vehicle was stopped.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:00 PM
-1

calling the police and pushing her off then closing the doors would have been reasonable.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:48 PM
1

Sikhs in England do not carry knives, but carry plastic ornamental ones.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:22 PM
0

Bus was stationary, shown clearly by the video
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:18 PM
3

^ This. I think /r/mensrights are a little too eager to defend this guy because he is male, he clearly went over the top. He was slapped while sitting and not driving the bus.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:18 PM
-5

His use of force was not reasonable, or equal.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:15 PM
-10

The bus was stopped, the video clearly shows that. We're entitled to use 'equal or necessary force' in self-defence, it was not necessary to uppercut and choke.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:55 PM
3

Also relevant: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/7995844/Judges-told-be-more-lenient-to-women-criminals.html "Judges have been told to deal less severely with female criminals than men when determining how to sentence them. "
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:36 PM
-16

Violentacrez was a sick fuck, and you are defending him?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:52 AM
-1

/r/justiceporn?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:29 PM
2

rape isn't defined as a penis, just being penetrated
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:51 PM
1

In a shop you just go to a person who works there say "hey, I can't find X, do you sell it?" they always escort me to the location of X
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:35 AM
2

the correct response would be exactly what the guy did, video tape everything and don't put your hands on anyone
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:31 AM
1

This [you] is the dumbest thing I have ever read, no offense.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:30 AM
2

Thank god the OP made it into a picture, wouldn't have been able to make any sense of it otherwise
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:38 PM
0

Yes but you stated it as fact, as if it was a universal truth for every man, when it is not.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 12:51 PM
1

Not true about the domestic violence one, at least not here in England, and no requirement for draft in England
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:41 AM
4

In the UK, judges were told to be more lenient towards women than men
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:43 PM
10

Men get breast cancer too though.. it's not a very good parody.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:21 PM
1

very weird considering BBC is owned by the people, thanks for looking I couldn't find it myself either
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:45 AM
1

Just curious, but has the BBC News ever mentioned this?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:27 AM
3

Did she do it?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:22 AM
1

I'm saying it's not googles definition, google isn't being sexist, it's the law.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:40 AM
-5

There's nothing sexist here, that is the UK laws definition too.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 09:21 PM
0

not 18 months, 5 years
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:18 PM
1

that's incorrect, a lot of male-on-female sex crimes don't get convicted
/r/MensRights06/08/12 11:43 PM
1

Oh sorry, the government make it very difficult to obtain them.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:29 PM
1

No, nearly all citizens don't
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:15 PM
1

I'm not saying we don't have armed police, but they're for when people have a gun, not the average citizen. I've never had the threat of them, or even seen them.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:03 PM
1

I was talking about England, but there's p lenty of others.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 04:54 PM
1

no it isn't.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 01:01 PM
2

I am 22, and a virgin and i've never killed anyone.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 08:41 AM
1

and in the countries where regular police do not use guns?
/r/MensRights23/07/12 08:33 AM
1

I'm not religious, I feel sorry for some people, but not criminals like murderers, rapists, etc.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:55 PM
0

No, it means he should have to worry about it happening, not that it should happen.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:46 AM
0

Where did I say that
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:35 AM
-3

There is never a good reason for crime.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 09:58 PM
-7

yes, he should
/r/MensRights01/07/12 09:05 PM
-2

Yes, and I wasn't saying I think he should die, just that I don't care that he's upset about his life and doesn't like it.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 08:46 PM
-3

I don't feel sorrow for him, I don't think we need to get rid of human rights or lynch, but I say let the chips fall where they may with him. He caused his problems, nobody else. Edit: that linked showed me 3 things. How easy it is to make Americans cheer, and how idiotic comedians and the majority of Americans whoa re for the death penalty are with math
/r/MensRights01/07/12 08:11 PM
-5

Excuse me if I feel no sorrow for a criminal.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 07:55 PM
2

Thank you :)
/r/MensRights26/06/12 06:58 PM
8

yeah the victim thing, if you flat out lie to make your point, you do more harm than good
/r/MensRights26/06/12 10:01 AM
-2

I'm not saying the article isn't true, i'm just saying the man is mentioned because dailymail is a racist, sexist newspaper for idiots
/r/MensRights26/06/12 09:50 AM
-6

foxnews, and dailynews is jsut as bad, I don't know anything of trutv and ria
/r/MensRights26/06/12 09:34 AM
0

Guys, it's the daily mail for fuck sake.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 08:46 AM
14

The last one is simply not true.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 08:44 AM
43

I don't think that's a case of sexism I think more redditors can connect with being a bully victim
/r/MensRights21/06/12 10:19 PM
4

I'm sure it';s been mentioned in this subreddit before, but rape is a man raping a woman, or another man, a woman cannot rape a man as there is no legal definition for this. This is England i'm referring too, dunno if it's the same in the US.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 06:06 PM
4

Anyone can change it back, i've done it before, and editted some articles. There's a list of recently editted articles
/r/MensRights16/06/12 11:37 AM
1

how could you tell it was American? o-o
/r/MensRights10/06/12 05:41 PM
1

singapore is ridiculously expensive? o-o TIL
/r/MensRights10/06/12 05:39 PM
1

It's not that simple, if you have rough sex with a woman, and she says you raped her, that's evidence pointing that you did, unless it's filmed it's not guarenteed either way so it'd be either nobody goes to jail for rape in which case it becomes legal, or some do.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 11:40 AM
2

ah, clever guy.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 12:28 PM
1

How do we know this actually happened? are we taking the guys word or what? Did she admit it to someone else other than him?
/r/MensRights26/05/12 10:24 AM
-2

Literally the dumbest thing i have heard in this subreddit. Edit: to expand since you people don't seem to get it, this is some companies voluntarily blocking sites they don't like if you choose the safety option. What evidence do you have that makes you think the UK is a feminist police state? There is none, this isn't the police doing this it's one or two ISP's (not even major ones).
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:30 PM
1

he is a racist, see username
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:24 AM
1

He's spent like 20 years with his mentality, and he's alone and sad about that, it's time to change the mentality.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 12:10 PM
1

yeah, my sister was allowed to cry, I wasn't, I still don't ofcourse but that line really stuck with me heh xD
/r/MensRights15/05/12 12:07 PM
5

The only thing I got as a child that my sister did not was "stop crying or I'll give you something to cry over"
/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:10 AM
3

The real answer isn't to keep looking, that there are plenty of fish etc, it's to lower your standards
/r/MensRights15/05/12 08:59 AM
0

Well I don't know US laws, I just thought there would be an equivalent. ><
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:09 PM
0

I'll find a US law, i'm sure they have an equivalent Edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Discrimination_Act_1977 I think this is rather close.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:07 PM
2

even when they're not watching but are in the room (public bathrooms!)
/r/MensRights10/05/12 11:17 AM
2

Agreed, nothing to do with her being a woman either, would feel the same if it was a man.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 10:00 AM
2

Your last paragraph is extremely dumb.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 09:59 AM
6

I'm also an adult, I can't handle /anyone/ else in the bathroom at the same time as me.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 09:54 AM
0

I'm on my iPad it yet read this butnthisvhouod be okay http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
/r/MensRights10/05/12 07:29 AM
0

It is illegal, discriminating against people based on race/religion/sexual orientation/gender is against the law.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 08:24 PM
-2

I agree about it being despicable for her to do this, but I also understand why you would, he is dangerous if he's willing to drink drive.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:11 PM
-7

I don't understand what's wrong with this? He chose to drink and drive, they didn't force him. He therefore deserves the punishment. I don't care if it was an anonymous report to the police, or something like this, if he did it he did it there's no arguing that one.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:00 PM
5

No they aren't. What the fuck is wrong with you? You are why r/MensRights has a bad name.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:03 PM
1

OP, are you actually a woman, or a male? Just curious from the replies.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 06:36 PM
1

The articles said it was three youths not three youth males, it's likely they weren't aware of the gender of the criminals. Car jackers wouldn't stay to guard a car and a sleeping girl that has their DNA in until the police gets there, these guys did.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:08 AM
1

After reading this if I was in such a situation I'd still report it to the police. My hours and reputation are less valuable to me than the life of a little girl
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:01 AM
1

If you're both drunk which one gets prosecuted [if any?]
/r/MensRights10/12/11 12:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter