TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ericphilbin Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by ericphilbin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

I think the point is that yes, people should help and support people, but that it should be gender-blind. You have an obligation as a human to help your (proverbial) brother, but not as a man an obligation to help every woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/16 12:54 AM
-1

It's on a comedy show, so I expect it's part satire. Also part, 'elected leaders (who happen to be men) have had too great an influence on women's lives' eg. abortion (which does have some merit). Noting to get too worked up over, IMO.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:29 AM
1

Best course of action, when the bill comes, make her pay her 43.5% of the bill.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:24 AM
4

All true, but not the point of the post. He broke the law, and all here would agree he deserved to answer for the crime. The point of the post is that fathers are treated differently simply for being men.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:07 AM
2

He wasn't a "convicted criminal", he plead for a lesser sentence because the odds were stacked against him in a way they aren't for mothers.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:04 AM
3

The father here isn't upset about being punished for his actions. He is upset that the fact that he is male means he is punished differently. As a parent to a son, you should be concerned too of the inequality of these situations.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:02 AM
5

Holy Fuck!. I'm normally not one to write to a network to complain, because I think ignoring that with which you don't agree is the best course of action. But I'm rethinking this one. For shame, NBC and SNL. For shame.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 10:30 AM
7

That's the rub. Why, at 50/50, should income disparity be an issue at all?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:29 PM
-15

That's fucked up, but c'mon, she's 11. Surely that has to be taken into account.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 10:04 PM
2

That's because text on a tshirt is horribly tacky.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:47 AM
1

We're not talking taxes here, we're talking about the distribution of money from one individual to another individual based not on what it takes to support a child (which would make sense), but on the level of income one makes.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 12:38 AM
1

"I only have to pay the bare minimum to feed and clothe the kid now, so fuck all those other expenses" I agree that this would be wrong. I'm just not sure we should legislate against it. In a perfect world, IMO, the wealthier payment would make minimum payments to a custody parent ONLY if the situation/custody percentage merited it. But they would also provide for things that their income could provide for, such a good health insurance and education costs.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 06:49 AM
2

to raise the child in a similar way. The assumption that they are entitled to that is incorrect.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 06:10 AM
1

This isn't about protecting the rich. It's about reducing unfair income distribution.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 06:05 AM
2

My life would be better with more money too. Should I reasonably expect it?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 06:01 AM
1

If there is 50/50 custody, the cost burden would be split equally, so why would there be a need to "equalize… between the wealthier parent and the less wealthy parent", regardless of income?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:57 AM
1

What about $800 per month in child support is inherently unstable? Noone here is suggesting not supporting their children.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:44 AM
5

Recognize why your husband feels the way he does. For the longest time, I was pro-circumcism because thats how I am, and coming to terms with it means coming to terms that something is wrong with me, and wrong with my parents decision making. Arguing that a circumcised penis is mutilated (which I would agree with) has the effect of, subconsciously or otherwise, calling your husband's penis mutilated. Imagine how you would feel if you had a disagreement with him that left you feeling like he feel…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:12 PM
5

It's the flip side to the man joking "My divorce costs me five thousand dollars every month; worth every penny."
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:50 PM
23

From your evidence, 100% of dads don't stick around. So clearly your experience is anecdotal.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 09:07 AM
10

Looks like the bigger guy in white came down to defend the young man, judging by young man's reaction to big guy's conversation with security.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:32 AM
2

I think labor laws might disagree with you there. You may not agree with it, but the law certainly says otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:03 AM
1

Unfortunately, not an effective way. Lawsuits do serve two purposes; one is to make a victim "whole" again, financially, and the other is to inflict punitive damage to a person or company to stop unwanted or illegal behavior.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:02 AM
9

Because it's not about the money, it's about making sure these illegal actions do not continue.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 08:51 PM
7

"Drag to resize". I don't get it.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 11:23 PM
1

What's this from?
/r/MensRights31/03/13 05:26 PM
-2

Sorry, down vote. Misleading title. Correlation ≠ causation.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:02 PM
2

I think he's simply saying that the "wrongdoing", the joking, wasn't something that needs to be apologized for.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:15 PM
3

They did do something wrong Now, did they really do something wrong? I'd say their actions (the joke) were unwise, but wrong seems like to strong a word.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:13 PM
7

Let's agree it'd be different.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:08 PM
2

I don't find it unfortunate that she Adria lost her job, because her job was specifically the opposite of the behavior she displayed.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:07 AM
1

God speed, my friend.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:51 AM
-1

I think that it does exempt him from support. It's the male equivalent to unilateral abortion.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:46 PM
0

You mean the woman has to agree to it. I totally understood that it is his choice fully. I could be way off, I realize.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:02 AM
2

Isn't giving up all paternal rights an option?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 09:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter