~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | My feminist friend says that everybody on this sub is a misogynistic sexistAsk her how she’s come to believe this? Is it from experience or has she bought into what she’s been told? Ask her if she believe in intersectionality (where Anglo-males are the least aggrieved and everyone else has increasing levels of victimization, ...and that entails). If she subscribes to this, is she not a misandrist? If she is, what is wrong with misogynism if bigotry is acceptable? Ask her if it’s possible she could be mistaken? If so, how would she go about proving, either true or false… | /r/MensRights | 26/11/18 01:34 AM |
| 1 | Unpopular opinion: Conscription and taxes are not comparable.This is untrue. One simply needs to leave that area and go to another area that won’t charge him for protection of the laws, etc. Name an area where one can live on their own and not pay taxes (legally). One can choose to not be in a particular country just as one can choose not to go to a particular restaurant. Have you ever left a country? You have to apply, be accepted, and it often takes years to do so. We’re also talking about some very specific tax free country yet to be named. I have had … | /r/MensRights | 17/11/18 03:35 PM |
| 1 | Unpopular opinion: Conscription and taxes are not comparable.Absolutely wrong. In a restaurant one willingly walks in and receives service. In a country that expects taxation no such option is given. One cannot produce, even if only for their own sustenance, with the option of not being taxed (i.e. property tax). One could choose not to enter a restaurant and order. The price is (typically) stated on the menu or by the wait staff before one orders their food for a reason. There’s an implied billing after services rendered. Again, no such option of refusal… | /r/MensRights | 15/11/18 11:45 AM |
| 1 | Unpopular opinion: Conscription and taxes are not comparable.Not exactly the same. When you entered the contract, a third party arbitration is implied to resolve conflicts. They’re not signed in a vacuum, in other words. The infrastructure is there, and understood as being applicable prior to (otherwise the contract would be pointless). Taxes have never received consent, explicit or implied. It is majority rule, which most accept. That’s why it isn’t met with wide spread revolt, but it has and it could. More importantly though is that consent was never re… | /r/MensRights | 15/11/18 04:18 AM |
| 1 | Unpopular opinion: Conscription and taxes are not comparable.That’s like disagreeing that the sun is in the sky. It’s definitional. Taking money by force is theft. “In common usage, theft is the taking of another person's property or services without that person's permission or consent with the intent to deprive the rightful owner of it.” Wikipedia (please see Wiki citations before you bash my site citation). | /r/MensRights | 14/11/18 09:38 PM |
| 4 | Unpopular opinion: Conscription and taxes are not comparable.“Conscription” is a fancy word for slavery. Nothing could be further from “The Land of the Free” here in the U.S. Taxes are state sponsored and publicly approved theft. That said, most reasonable people would agree to pay for some mutually beneficial expenses, such as guaranteeing natural rights (justifiable by the staunchest of libertarians). | /r/MensRights | 14/11/18 09:13 PM |
| 0 | "fun", "cringe"Switch the roles. Acceptable? | /r/MensRights | 05/10/18 06:42 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter