TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

erok81 Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by erok81 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Heads up, you probably mean equalist instead of humanist. A humanist is someone "attaching prime importance to human rather than divine or supernatural matters". That's not to say you can't be both though.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 10:28 PM
7

Paraphrasing section 523(a)(6) A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228 (a), 1228 (b), or 1328 (b) of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt... for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity; He's right either way.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:37 PM
1

They would still need to have actual damages to sue. Regardless he may have an absolute defence to a civil suit because they were trespassing.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:04 AM
16

Me too. This judge already has a rep for letting serious offenders off easy. FYI, he should be up for a retention election again in 2014, that's our chance to get rid of him.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 02:05 AM
4

I would bet good money that once Family Services is involved that they will move mountains to make sure the child goes back to the mother.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:27 PM
8

In my state, you have 10 days to get rid of unwanted guests or you will have go through the eviction process. But it's not absurd, it's to protect tenants from less than honest landlords. Otherwise there'd be no need for evictions when a landlord could simply assert a tenant was trespassing to have them removed by police.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:23 PM
2

Call recording on android is hit or miss. Android itself supports proper 2 way call recording, it's just some manufactures don't bother to include the necessary driver support. That leaves apps to record from the mic and hope it picks up the other side of the call. That's workable, but it makes one side of the conversation sound very very quiet.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 10:29 PM
1

If op is gonna file a report, best to do it while the injuries are fresh because if it comes down to he said/she said he will lose in court.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:49 PM
3

I can't fault you for being scared or upset as this self appointed child "protector" probably was crazy. After all, anyone who would see a dad doing normal, everyday dad stuff with his kids and think they needed to intervene likely has a mental defect of some sort. To think this nut could have followed you home.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:27 AM
5

Not a lawyer here, but generally you are allowed to defend others and it counts as self defense. So you wouldn't need to claim anything else but self defense. "Battered woman syndrome" is more of a last ditch excuse for murdering your husband and the fact that juries even accept it shows just how far we have to go.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 01:01 AM
8

I don't mean for this to sound like a lecture but... By taking the kid she's insuring that in court you can't claim that she abandoned your daughter. Second, by claiming you're abusive she get's to keep your child away from you without looking like the bad guy. If there is a hearing happening, it's for a tro against you. And all this happened just two weeks after a dropped a DV case against her, leaving you with just that much less leverage. It really does sound like your wife has plans to file …
/r/MensRights03/06/12 09:51 AM
2

It's not a state by state lobbying effort. It's federal law that says states must do x, y and z or lose funding for something important.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 12:34 AM
1

It was court order. She should be punished exactly as anyone else should be. Also, it's a criminal act to defy a court order, so yes the act is criminal.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:45 AM
2

Any press is good press I assume. I agree that the word feminism is too loaded to be any real use at this point. We drop it everywhere yet lots of people still think it's a force of good. Hate to break it to everyone, but it's kinda like explaining how the sun indirectly causes thousands of deaths per year. People look at you like you're insane until you give the sun's influence a name: the weather. In other words, we need a word to replace "feminism" as we understand it.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:18 AM
1

I disagree about it being a lack of societal virtue. I think it's quite the opposite, societal "virtue" says that it's ok to use violence against men, even if it's implicitly said. For example, "Never hit a lady", etc implies it's ok to hit men because we're not ladies.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:01 AM
1

Sounds like you have primary custody. Talk to you states DFS about it and they should be willing to go to court on your behalf. Chances are she will be required to pay something over nothing. Better yet, talk to your ex about what your options are and don't blindside her with a summons to court/administrative hearing. It's really is in everyone's interest to get along here or a least be a better man and give fair warning. You don't seem like you'd especially enjoy the resulting acrimony either. …
/r/MensRights01/04/12 09:18 AM
4

There's a name for this: Parental Alienation.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 08:06 AM
31

Even if they're fat, ugly or a bitch, the problem isn't that men don't want them. It's their own standards of what makes a man "worthy" of them as well as an inflated sense of self worth that keeps them single. In other words they've priced themselves off the market.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 06:54 PM
1

The system works. /s
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:54 PM
13

His story sounds like a typical white knight fantasy and he's the hero. Then he goes on to describe the sister's friend as a slut, except in name, and yet he was willing to risk going to jail for her honor. Either he's a moron or he's full of shit, probably both.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 11:24 PM
1

I think they actually arrest you and charge you if it's a serious crime. Everything else is handled through an administrative process.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 05:40 PM
2

Just look at the reasons given in that list, those are the justifications a spoiled bratty child would give for a tantrum. To put it another way, these are women who aren't accustomed to being held responsible for their behavior or being told no.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 03:53 AM
1

Not sure about your jurisdiction, but just signing the birth certificate could have legal implications.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 09:44 PM
1

Perhaps no one has actually filed a complaint with the police yet. According to this anyone can file the complaint. What is not so clear to me is if anyone connected to the lawsuit has a duty to report it.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 02:28 AM
2

You really need to realize that when she does things like this she is the one being abusive. She's using the cops to do her dirty work and that is no less abusive than using physical violence. You need to stand up for yourself and your child. It's pretty obvious her vindictiveness is escalating and next time a TRO might be the least of your worries. I think you need to reevaluate your relationship because your daughter certainly isn't going to have both parents if this nonsense lands you in pris…
/r/MensRights29/10/11 02:35 AM
9

Well technically, she's not been convicted of any crime yet and he's still a minor. That's why she has custody even though it's pretty damn obvious she's guilty. There still maybe hope for this young man yet and the fact she's not already been tried might be in his favor. The delay works for him because it gives him time to reach age 18. Secondly, post conviction if she does any reasonable time in prison he can ask the court for custody then. Thirdly, in some states, the court can not award cust…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:58 AM
13

The author gave the sister in-law a pussy pass. No doubt if it had been a man doing the molesting she would have reported it to the police. I'm reserving my sympathy for the true victim here, the son.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 01:10 AM
5

He's 11. There is no way he can fully understand the implications of such a choice. At least though it appears his current treatment isn't permanent and hopefully he'll better able to understand the ramifications in the future.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:43 AM
0

I like this idea but I think it would incentivise poor folks to have more children than they would have otherwise. Perhaps putting a cap on how many children the state would pay for would be wise. The reason I think this would work well for everyone is that the money part of the relationships would be gone. Which would lead to less acrimony and therefore more cooperative parenting.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:03 AM
3

Even if you can't afford a lawyer right now, you should at least go sit down with a couple of them and see where you stand legally as well as get feel for how much you can expect to spend on one. Find out what your state's child support guidelines are. If you're currently paying less than what a would court order, I'd consider sitting tight as long as you are still seeing your daughter regularly. Use that "extra" money to save for the day that a lawyer becomes a necessity. I'm not an attorney an…
/r/MensRights02/09/11 02:03 AM
1

It's this kind of thinking, the same kind that says massive indiscriminate eavesdropping is ok, that tells me just how screwed up this country really is.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 05:38 AM
1

If I understand the relevant law, the SOL is one year for a misdemeanor and 3 years for a felony (with all kinds of exceptions of course). Doesn't really matter what the prosecution wants if the SOL has run out.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 01:30 AM
4

I'm guessing the statutory limit has passed.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 10:04 AM
2

Women almost never get the death penalty and even fewer actually get executed.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 07:07 PM
1

You can't always watch the other party take the pill. . . That's exactly right. Which is why I think it's important to have better options for birth control especially male birth control.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 10:38 PM
2

I'm saying a registry would fail because women by and large wouldn't sign up for it. After all, they would stand to lose something from such an arrangement. More precisely, any resultant children would stand to lose something, which in this case would be a child's right to financial support from their parents (a right that can't be taken away anyway). More importantly, I think this addresses the wrong issue. If both sides agree that they don't want kids, birth control would do more to further th…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 08:22 PM
2

Sorry but I think this would be a dismal failure. If given the choice between 100% of my income or 100% of my income and 30-50% of someone else's, I'm not so sure I'd sign up to remove the second option.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 06:54 PM
4

Most bullying is an unacknowledged issue. At certain ages (basically up to middle school) gender doesn't have a whole lot to do with it. It really boils down to a unwillingness to report it on the victims part plus if they did it turns into a he said she said deal with the parents. All said, Lori Drew should have been sent to prison for murder. She knew what she doing and should have known better as an adult. You can go to jail in missouri for self defense but not if you convince a minor to kill…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 11:23 AM
47

It gets a free pass because it's girly and we're all expected to believe that girly = harmless. I suspect that this bravado actually undermines female confidence more than anything else because if you inflate someones ego enough, eventually reality will come crashing down on their heads and it will hurt more than a little bit. I don't think much of people who prop their egos up with bullshit platitudes so consider that the words on that second shirt aren't the only message being sent out.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 06:49 AM
1

Switch banks even if it's a hassle. They can't take money they can't find. Don't mail them a personal check or sign up for automatic payments of any kind. You're probably SOL on the money they already stole but I'd seek out an attorney anyway to get some actual legal advice, especially on how to keep this from happening in the future.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 09:24 PM
1

You called CPS and that's a good start but now you need to go to the police and file a complaint while the bruising is still there. I wouldn't expect the CPS actually do something until the police are involved. I definitely think this is cause for some sort of investigation into how she got them.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:00 AM
5

I don't see anything that would preclude her from going back to school so she can earn more for herself.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 06:25 PM
8

This is exactly what we should be rallying against, not because it effects us too but because it's plainly not fair.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 08:52 AM
11

Why not?
/r/MensRights30/05/11 05:57 PM
1

Ah ok, TIL. I always assumed so unless explicitly told otherwise. Thank you.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 07:42 AM
1

"mansplaining". Sounds like a made up term for a problem that doesn't actually exist and/or is intentionally derisive. Doesn't help the real issues, just ignore it.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 07:38 AM
2

cis?
/r/MensRights20/05/11 07:13 AM
3

It really comes down to who kept better records and a basic assumption that memory isn't the best source. I"ll take the word of someone who says "X happened on X day and I wrote it down" over "Well maybe it was june, maybe it was july, I don't remember the exact words he used but it did hurt my feelings" My advice for these situations: take the notes whether you can corroborate the them or not. Details count. Also IANAL...
/r/MensRights20/05/11 07:12 AM
2

He could sue but unless he had undeniable proof it never happened he could lose. Worse the parents of the accuser could counter-sue and win. I'm sure he'd rather have the entire ordeal buried and forgotten so he can get on with his life.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 07:03 PM
32

Bingo. "Mom loses custody because she has cancer" is a much better selling title than "Mom loses custody because she is unable to care for her children"
/r/MensRights13/05/11 07:24 PM
3

I think it's incorrect to assume that breast cancer is an automatic death sentence. It was likely the judge knew just how bad (or not) her situation was and weighed that against what was best for the children, which was being with the parent most capable of caring for them. Sure the mother got the short end of the stick, that's what happens to fathers everyday and it's always justified as what's best for the kids so I don't see a problem with this.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 07:18 PM
3

The judge possibly could have ordered restitution, which would be better than a civil judgment that can be discharged through bankruptcy.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 07:03 PM
19

I want to see more articles written like this. The author didn't let it break down into an angry tirade and really let the facts speak for themselves.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 05:14 AM
1

Now see, I looked at that pic and I can't help but see two people having a good time, irrespective of relationship. Keep up the good work, you're a credit to fathers to everywhere.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 09:30 AM
3

I'd suspect places like those to be worse. I'm in the midwest and I've had no trouble going anywhere with my daughter.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 09:17 AM
2

I'm with you, 8 year old daughter, no problems going out in public.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 09:15 AM
1

I have a critique here for you. Paperwork isn't really going to change human behavior. People will still forget to use a condom, birth control pills will be forgotten, and relationships will inevitably progress forward. Even there was a legal form that one could fill out, if either party held any sort of upper hand in the relationship, no doubt they'd be dictating all the terms. Just my two cents.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 02:42 AM
6

I didn't write the law. I think it's crap to make a man pay for someone else's child. What this law really boils down to is pay up or don't see the kids you've been raising even if it hurts the kids worse. Which really fits well into the framework of most child support laws don't you think?
/r/MensRights24/01/11 02:35 PM
18

That's just sick. The worst part of this is, should he every divorce his wife, is that in some states he'll be on the hook for child support if he signed the birth certificate. In my state, you have two years after you sign the certificate to avoid paying for someone else's child, which pretty much fucks over any man who doesn't get a paternity test ASAP.
/r/MensRights24/01/11 10:24 AM
1

|If I slip some crack into your pocket and you immediately throw it away, you can't be charged I disagree that you can't be charged. The prosecutor could charge you with anything they wanted really because it'll be their word against yours until you go to court. I realize intent should be properly accounted for, but you also have to realize the typical irrationality that comes with certain types of cases. |Which they? Whoever gets caught including the one who sent the original picture. A bit of …
/r/MensRights18/01/11 10:30 PM
1

I actually considered those same questions myself when I posted above. You can't put the genie back in bottle, but we can try to limit the harm done. I suppose, we could simply change the nature of the punishment rather than the meaning of the law itself. What if we treated sexting more like breaking curfew? They get caught with it, pictures get confiscated and a minor punishment is given with no long term legal consequences. If they're sharing the pictures with others, same deal for everyone wh…
/r/MensRights18/01/11 08:27 PM
3

There's nothing funny about our modern puritanical hysteria about sex when it's designed to push an agenda of "no sex unless your trying for kids". From which we have continuing issues with gay marriage, abstinence only sex ed, and of course, people spreading disease because they're told it's a sin to wear a condom. Don't take this as me being offended by your comment, I just wanted to express my opinion about sex in society. I do agree with you though, sex offender registries are almost functio…
/r/MensRights18/01/11 07:57 PM
1

Making it legal for the person it was sent to sounds reasonable enough but the idea of revoking consent after it was sent sounds like trouble. Personally, I think Romeo and Juliet laws have it mostly right. If those sort of laws could be expanded to cover sexting and the hi-tech consequences of sexting (a picture can potentially last for eternity), we be on the right track. That said, a deeper issue here is mandatory minimum sentences. I doubt many judges want to so harshly punish these children…
/r/MensRights18/01/11 07:14 PM
12

While I find it refreshing that the cause of our health is being taking up, I'm complaining about the fact that all the reasons listed blame men.
/r/MensRights03/11/10 11:04 AM
2

As an uncle and a father myself, I think you're over thinking the risks, assuming you have a reasonably sane family. Just treat her like you do your nephew (except for the obvious cases, like buying gifts) and be the best role model you can be.
/r/MensRights28/10/10 01:57 AM
7

I see the top comment says to let the police interview the child. Don't let the police interview the child! If the child has been coached anything he says might be used to hang your brother. Besides, the police shouldn't be interviewing children about abuse, that's the job of child psychologist. He should talk to his lawyer about getting a guardian ad litem appointed. He needs to stop using drugs (and drinking too) because there will be enough delay in getting a court ordered drug test for him t…
/r/MensRights26/09/10 11:17 AM
1

An IQ of 72 never stopped the state of Texas. And it's not like this was a plot only a mastermind could pull off. That said, I'm firmly against the death penalty for anyone, for any reason.
/r/MensRights24/09/10 12:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter