error40000004 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
11	Man changed name on his CV to a female name and got 870% more responses for an interview. Theres plenty of evidence for all of our claims. If you want to deny stats and science and sink to the tier of flat earther, thats in you. Where are the grants to make male teachers? Where is the free education, and the support programs? I see plenty for women. Where are the men ones?	/r/MensRights	12/07/22 04:39 PM
9	Man changed name on his CV to a female name and got 870% more responses for an interview. And how fucking convenient you completely ignored my points about the teaching and nursing field. Whats the matter?	/r/MensRights	12/07/22 04:31 PM
15	Man changed name on his CV to a female name and got 870% more responses for an interview. Yes because enforced diversity and gender quotas when the people are not equally qualified is asinine and backwards as fuck. Youre exactly the type of activist self righteous know it all that thinks ""diversity"" is more important than actually doing a job right. Are you really gonna come on this subreddit to spew that garbage?	/r/MensRights	12/07/22 04:28 PM
24	Man changed name on his CV to a female name and got 870% more responses for an interview. And what does that have to do with experience and merit? Who gives a fuck if theyre a woman if theyre less qualified for a job? So youre in support of racial and gender quotas? Why are you even on this sub?	/r/MensRights	12/07/22 01:45 PM
55	Man changed name on his CV to a female name and got 870% more responses for an interview. So where is the massive drive to get male teachers and nurses? Same old tired bullshit and excuses lmfao.	/r/MensRights	12/07/22 01:44 PM
20	The Roe v Wade ruling is an opportunity for men to gain reproductive rights that have thus far been non existent. Why don't you try reading my point again since you clearly weren't smart enough to understand the first time.	/r/MensRights	26/06/22 04:00 PM
12	The Roe v Wade ruling is an opportunity for men to gain reproductive rights that have thus far been non existent. We can agree to disagree. Establishing abortion rights again would be good, but doing so without including mens rights would only further cement the idea they are not as important.	/r/MensRights	26/06/22 03:53 PM
12	The Roe v Wade ruling is an opportunity for men to gain reproductive rights that have thus far been non existent. The women can do whatever she wants with her body. The issue is that we need to shift the mentality of society, so that men are not automatically expected to pay but instead are only required to pay if they actually want the kid. Women might even have more abortions than they do now under this because most men prob don't pay for accidental kids that the women might want to keep and thats perfectly fine.	/r/MensRights	26/06/22 02:52 PM
31	The Roe v Wade ruling is an opportunity for men to gain reproductive rights that have thus far been non existent. Then what you need is someone to start their politic career by advocating for this.	/r/MensRights	26/06/22 02:48 PM
5	Just a little contrast on the male curfew, the same thing was imposed on black and brown people back before the civil rights movement in order to prevent them from committing crime and "harming white people" Lmfao sure you did buddy. And why didn't you whip out your phone and start recording? Oh wait, because it never happened.	/r/MensRights	29/03/21 10:08 AM