TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

erwgv3g34 Archive

View 49 posts and 104 comments by erwgv3g34 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
654

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill11/09/19 10:48 AM
461

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 05:08 PM
398

Cultureerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill23/08/19 11:44 PM
301

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill05/12/18 05:16 AM
217

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 02:52 PM
199

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill01/09/19 04:41 PM
192

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 02:40 PM
153

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 04:18 PM
110

Men's Rightserwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 05:38 PM
106

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 09:16 AM
91

Men's Rightserwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 03:25 PM
87

Blue Pill Exampleerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 06:49 PM
82

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 02:00 AM
81

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 01:52 PM
79

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 12:49 AM
77

Men's Rightserwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 01:13 AM
73

Discriminationerwgv3g34/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:48 AM
62

Marriage/Childrenerwgv3g34/r/MensRights07/09/20 03:51 AM
55

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 08:20 AM
44

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 07:21 PM
42

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 06:52 PM
35

Off Topicerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 09:44 PM
31

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 02:30 AM
29

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 10:51 AM
27

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 05:59 PM
26

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 04:19 PM
26

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 06:14 PM
25

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 04:09 AM
24

Off Topicerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 01:03 AM
23

erwgv3g34/r/MGTOW23/04/21 11:36 AM
21

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 01:18 PM
21

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 01:06 AM
21

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 02:33 AM
20

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 02:33 AM
20

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 02:03 AM
19

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 04:05 PM
13

Rant/Ventingerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 03:03 PM
12

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill09/09/13 12:14 AM
11

erwgv3g34/r/MGTOW06/01/19 04:33 PM
9

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 03:42 PM
9

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 09:15 PM
8

Men's Rightserwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 01:23 AM
7

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 05:25 AM
5

erwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 06:36 PM
3

erwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 09:16 AM
1

Red Pill Theoryerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 06:36 PM
1

Blue Pill Exampleerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:44 PM
0

Off Topicerwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 08:09 PM
0

Men's Rightserwgv3g34/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 03:17 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

No, women don't want to marry a random beta provider and have sex with him to bear his children, but neither do they want to end up as single mothers or childless spinsters, either. What they want is to become the exclusive wife of Chad, but that is simply not possible because there aren't enough Chads around for every woman. By default, what ends up happening is that women waste their youth and fertility chasing after Chad, and end up as either single mothers or childless spinsters depending on…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 02:48 AM
-5

No, the solution is to make women property again. It's how literally every civilization in history worked until the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Women's free sexual choice is a coordination problem that will destroy civilization very quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:49 PM
2

So all I hear with this way of thinking is that you want someone young enough that she hasn’t experienced anything yet. Yes_Chad.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 01:01 AM

Yes it is. It means that, in the absence of powerful coercive mechanisms, 80% of men become incels, and 80% of women spend their fertile years getting pumped and dumped by the top 20% of men. The only one who wins is Chad. The only solution to the wars of the sexes is to make women property again.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 12:07 PM

But they are only attracted to the top 20% of men, whereas men are attracted to 80% of fertile-age women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 10:37 AM

Unless one of the parents should be in prison for criminal abuse, children are always better off if their parents stay together than if they divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 04:13 PM
10

r/Fiveheads
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/23 05:09 PM
1

As soon as possible after puberty, around 13 or so. Personally, I feel the redpill is best understood through the context of evopsych, so I would probably allocate a year just to studying evolution and evolutionary psychology by reading through The Selfish Gene (and other Dawkins), The Moral Animal, The Adapted Mind, and The Myth of Monogamy before starting the red pill proper with Rollo Tomassi's The Rational Male trilogy and The Red Pill Handbook + The Red Pill Sidebar.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/23 01:58 PM
8

https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1540/74/1540742644720.jpg
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/06/23 06:23 AM
14

https://www.redpillhandbook.com/
/r/TheRedPill06/01/23 10:06 PM
5

Yes, this is the problem Nabil ad Dajjal pointed out: I don’t know much about factory work but my dad was an HVAC mechanic for most of his working life and as much as I respect him I wouldn’t ever consider doing the same. Skilled tradesmen like plumbers, carpenters, electricians, HVAC, etc can make solid money even without advanced degrees. In theory, you could support a family on that income. In practice, all that money you earn will go straight to alimony and child support since even a woman w…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/01/22 04:26 AM
16

Remember the Litany of Gendlin: What is true is already so. Owning up to it doesn't make it worse. Not being open about it doesn't make it go away. And because it's true, it is what is there to be interacted with. Anything untrue isn't there to be lived. People can stand what is true, for they are already enduring it. And the Litany of Tarski: If the red pill is right about women, I desire to believe that the red pill is right about women; If the red pill is not right about women, I desire to be…
/r/TheRedPill25/11/21 08:04 PM
8

The future belongs to those that show up.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 02:29 AM
8

This is a great homage to a classic antifeminist cartoon.
/r/MGTOW26/12/20 08:44 PM
22

They are generalizing from one example. That list reads like a bunch of traits that would make a man attractive to her, so she thinks that having them will make her attractive to men. Classic female solipsism. Problem is, men and women are attracted to different things. Men don't give a shit how much a woman earns, or how much education she has, or how much she has traveled. We care about youth, beauty, fertility, purity, and domesticity; all traits that she has squandered on her path to becomin…
/r/MGTOW03/08/20 06:25 AM
5

This is a shop. The actual book is called The Day Khrushchev Panicked by George B. Mair.
/r/MGTOW04/10/19 12:56 PM
5

I don't think there is anything quite so annoying and pointless as a dedicated 'niceguy' moaning about bad boys getting all the girls. If that's genuinely how they think it works, what's stopping them from simply waking up tomorrow, being an asshole and rolling in poon themself? From "The Fifth Meditation on Creepiness" by Scott Alexander: I've tried the Machiavellian liar routine a few times myself. "Oh, hey, you're Jennifer or Jessica or Julia or whatever, right? I appear to have totally by co…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/19 11:47 PM
57

You may not be interested in the culture war, but the culture war is interested in you.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/19 01:21 AM
1

If you like Steve Johnson, you will love James A. Donald. http://blog.jim.com/culture/the-ancestral-environment-of-females/ http://blog.jim.com/economics/the-cause-of-population-decline/ http://blog.jim.com/culture/the-anti-anti-reactionary-faq-sluts/ http://blog.jim.com/culture/the-false-life-plan/ http://blog.jim.com/culture/fertility/
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 04:36 PM
9

His best posts on gender dynamics are actually at his old blog. They're the Meditations. Ten Short Scenes from India The First Meditation on Privilege The Second Meditation on Privilege The Third Meditation on Privilege The Fourth Meditation on Creepiness The Fifth Meditation on Creepiness The Sixth Meditation on Superweapons The Seventh Meditation on the War on Applause Lights The Eighth Meditation on Superweapons and Bingo The Ninth Meta-tation on Meta
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 08:27 PM
1

Try this.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 04:17 PM
40

Make sure to read Steve Johnson and DrBeat over in the comment section; those guys know what they're talking about! Some highlights: "Women's free sexual choice is a coordination problem that will destroy civilization very quickly." "Basically women are smaller, weaker and less intelligent but still have genetic aims." "Women are herd creatures to a much greater degree than men are and will basically try to figure out what the culture asks of them and do it." "For the few men there's only so man…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 04:16 PM
16

Repeat after me: What is true is already so. Owning up to it doesn't make it worse. Not being open about it doesn't make it go away. And because it's true, it is what is there to be interacted with. Anything untrue isn't there to be lived. People can stand what is true, for they are already enduring it. And again: If the red pill is correct, I desire to believe that the red pill is correct; If the red pill is not correct, I desire to believe that the red pill is not correct; Let me not become at…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:33 PM
14

You are correct about the incentives women face, but wrong about the reason why the government does this. The real reason is vote-buying. Once female suffrage occurred, it was only a matter of time until fierce political competition for the female vote led to today. It's easy to blame the 19th amendment, but it was inevitable. Democracies inherently seek to expand their franchises and elect their own populace. It is a horrible mistake; a perversion of the natural, patriarchal order which a monar…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 08:57 PM
0

Fucking WHAT? You need higher SMV males to get away with violence? Are you insane? Why is this a problem? Aristocrats used to duel each other all the time. It worked fine. Uh, no. You're talking about reducing female SMV at this point. I'm sure some beta males want a LTR with a stupid cunt that will never know better, but an alpha male wants a high SMV woman for an LTR which usually includes some brains. Education does not improve intelligence, which is genetic. Western education serves only to …
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 02:59 PM
3

And a man is SOL if he has dreams and aspirations that he can't find anyone to pay him for, like studying the classics and traveling the world. Or dreams and aspirations that don't pay enough to provide for his family, like becoming a novelist. I don't understand how feminists can possibly think that having a career (i.e. slaving away from 9 to 5 for 5 days a week, 50 weeks per year, for 40 years doing stressful, repetitive bullshit) is some big advantage men used to have over women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/14 01:37 PM
3

Add 2 spaces at the end of each paragraph?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/14 04:00 AM
5

Obviously means that the kid's father was killed, not that the kid ordered his old man bumped off.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 02:33 AM
1

Mu. There should be no such thing as divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/14 02:18 AM
8

Someone is going to make her miserable and get rewarded with sex for it. Might as well be you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 04:07 PM
9

Do you realize you are advocating unilateral population reduction? No other population than the West is gonna stop having children, so the world is just going to get overpopulated by other people. And those other people are not even going to stay in their own countries; Western elites are bending over backwards to bring in ever more immigrants, so it's not like the West can even enjoy the benefits of a low population density.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 05:58 PM
5

No, a bad boy is a dude who is hot BECAUSE he is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 05:20 PM
11

Jim argues that there is empirical evidence: But men in this proposed scenario (responsibility for childcare shared by a wider community instead of being exclusively placed on the nuclear family) do have stable families. They have their sisters and brothers, their nieces and nephews. A lot of societies have in fact implemented this solution. See JD Unwin’s survey. They live in grass huts. The men do not defend their society or their womenfolk against external aggression, nor do they work, save, …
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 11:51 PM
6

Not quite as dramatically as I posed it, no. But with nothing to protect, there will be less men and less men willing to become soldiers and policemen, and those that do will be less and less willing to put themselves in danger. That's before even taking into account our declining birth rate. Not to mention that a large part of military power is having a technological and economical edge, which are also threatened when every incentive men have to create wealth is destroyed by their society.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 09:51 PM
6

Russians, Chinese, Arabs... and those are just our external enemies. What do you think our vast underclass of criminal thugs like Trayvon Martin would do if one day the police and the army simply shrugged their sholders and said "fuck this shit?" New Orleans. Los Angeles. Chicago.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 09:40 PM
3

Do you want New York and Washington D.C. to end up like Rome?
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 09:01 PM
8

From AntiDem's ask.fm account: In the current anti-male climate, where politicians loot from producers to buy votes from immigrants and welfare queens, what possible incentive is there for a man to build? Shouldn't we all just go Galt, have sex with whores, and enjoy the decline? No. And you're not going to enjoy what's coming - no one will. If you think you will, you're fucking delusional.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 05:54 PM
1

I get that, but what I'm seeing from these posts is mostly "modern life sucks because it's not how I want it to be". ? What else could "modern life sucks" possibly mean? Is there some sort of objective, preference-independent standard by which one can claim modern life sucks or doesn't suck? I think I get the heart of the argument now. If you'll allow my rant... You've got the general idea, but I don't think you're really grokking it yet. For many people, asabiyyah is what makes life worth livin…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/14 04:41 PM
2

Looking at those, I'd say that the Disney Concert Hall DOES suck, Falling Water looks better, and I'm a bit confused by the hyperrealism stuff. Mind you, as you may have noticed, I've largely stuck to quoting Red Pill and Reactionary thinkers on this thread rather than trying to argue the points on my own. I figured your post was a good opportunity to introduce people to a broad outline of their views.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/14 06:31 AM
1

5- No idea what you mean by this, but if you're basically saying "pop culture sucks", it's always sucked. You want good music/architecture/whatever else? There are places where it's just as good as its always been. James A. Donald makes several comments about modern art in the comment section of "The Cathedral goes viral": Destroying images that people treat as having religious significance, or view as emblematic of religion, destroying them in ways that intentionally cause offense, is something…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/14 05:49 AM
2

http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2014/01/03/more-ominous-than-a-strike/ A strike can be negotiated with; offer them a bit more and they'll get back to work. Better yet, offer a few of them a side deal and break the cohesion. True strikes require moral or legal force to avoid this sort of peeling off. The problem for the modern West is far worse. What we are seeing isn't men throwing a collective temper tantrum, noble or otherwise. What we are seeing is men responding to incentives. Even worse, inert…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/14 05:11 AM
1

Mice experiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/14 04:31 AM
1

Hoo, boy, is there ever. http://www.moreright.net/what-is-wrong-with-modernity/ Low social engagement/civic participation (Putnam). Social engagement is about half of what it was during the 60s. People are in half the activity clubs, having half the dinner parties, etc. What is replacing all these clubs and dinner parties is apparently Facebook and League of Legends. The ability of people to have conversations has gone to hell. People suck more at conversations because they are addicted to elect…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/14 04:28 AM
1

That sure sounds like "you are entitled to sex because of penis" and "rape them if you have to". Depending on your personal ethics, of course. But sexual strategy is amoral so don't worry about ethics. That's a very uncharitable reading. It could easily mean that there are ethically controversial situations (such as seducing married women, pump-and-dumping someone who was looking for commitment, etc...) which men who are willing to engage in will find greatly expands their pool of available wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/14 04:46 PM
2

Be wary of women and of what they say compared to how they act. This is the tricky part. When you say it like this, in vague general terms, it sounds inoffensive. When you get into the specifics of how women act, how it's completely different from how they say they act, and how you can take advantage of that information to become successful at one-night-stands or long-term-relationships... hoo, boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/14 04:38 PM
11

If humans were perfectly rational, purely selfish utility maximizing robots who cared only about getting laid, you would have a point. Of course, that is not the case. Humans like communities, and debating, and making friends, and sharing advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/14 11:51 AM
3

Which did you pick? I've been thinking of either an Arab country or the Philippines.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 03:00 AM
1

Pardon me, sir, are you talking about me?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/14 12:04 AM
7

May I recommend that you remove that rule, then? A law you cannot enforce is no law at all. It only delegitimatizes your authority.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 08:44 PM
-1

If a female fetus is exposed to higher levels of testosterone in utero, she will exhibit male behaviors. This has been done artificially in rats and is claimed to have been observed in humans that display gender atypical preferences. I agree that externally induced damage to a human's natural hormonal equilibrium may well result in aberrant behavior. To use a very cliched phrase here, gender is bit of a spectrum. Yes, it's a spectrum in the sense that you could theoretically see an instance with…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 08:37 PM
2

Bro, do you even sexual dimorphism? If evolution can produce peacocks and black widows, you bet it can produce less pronounced physical differences between human males and females. And guess what? Minds are instantiated in brains, which are made up of physical parts, so we can have mental differences, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 04:43 PM
11

Do you have ANY WAY to enforce the no downvoting rule? Because as far as I can tell, it's currently a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 04:32 PM
0

Attraction is not a property of men. It is a property of the mind which regards men. Gay men and straight women have very different minds, and what they are attracted to in males will be vastly different.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 04:28 PM
3

Please make a new post and link to this thread when you do. Empiricism FTW!
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 09:20 AM
8

Come on, every group has its goofy jargon. Physicists call the third derivative of position "jerk," ffs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 06:40 PM
19

Asking why women with high n's are unattractive relationship material is like asking why bitter tastes are unpalatable for dinner. There is no higher-level conscious justification, it's just a built-in preference in the brain. Now, there is obviously a causal history for how that preference got there which involves evolutionary psychology, but I don't think that's what you are asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 06:38 PM
2

The diet includes 1 cheat day per week. If your body feels a craving for vitamins, that's your chance to pig out and eat all the vegetables and fruits you can.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 04:06 AM
3

Dana Banana 9 is a moderator of /r/RedPillWomen and a particularly notorious figure in /r/TheBluePill.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 03:56 AM
0

Link(s)?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 01:18 AM
6

Have you tried asking the RPW directly? I don't think they would object to your making a thread in their subreddit and asking them questions as long as you are polite about it. I also recommend that you read Sunshine Mary. She's retired now, but her blog archives contain extensive discussions of red pill ideas from the point of view of a Christian wife and mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 11:51 PM
9

Exactly. Far better to be a big fish in a small pond. That's how cult leaders work; they are considered creepy weirdos by mainstream society, but damn if they don't sleep with all of the cult members' wives.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 09:33 PM
2

Holy shit, I can't believe I failed to realize that. Upvoted!
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 04:48 PM
11

This is just information. What you do with it is between you and your utility function. Hate the woman, love the woman, fuck her in her youth, become her beta provider; whatever. Just be aware of it. And no, this is not common sense. Show this article to 99% of people. See how they react.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 12:57 AM
49

Women react to men who give away commitment in the same way men react to women who give away sex.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 06:10 PM
1

Rational wiki is a joke. And if you know enough to know that democracy is an exercise in manufacturing consent, then you are already deeply ingrained in the neoreactionary ideology.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 04:49 PM
1

What is true is already so. Owning up to it doesn't make it worse. Not being open about it doesn't make it go away. And because it's true, it is what is there to be interacted with. Anything untrue isn't there to be lived. People can stand what is true, for they are already enduring it.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 07:33 PM
5

You can get an annulment in the Phils for $5000. Even without that, they separate and fuck around as you'd expect. But can it be done unilaterally by the woman, like the U.S.? If it can, can the man withhold all the children and property and force the woman to start from scratch to pursue this road?
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 04:20 PM
26

And then what? Live in her country the rest of your life? If you bring her here she won't remain traditional for long. Not to mention, there is literally one country left in the world that doesn't have divorce yet, and that is the Philippines.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 10:38 AM
7

This isn't about size; it's about bravery. And I'm not a misogynist. I simply recognize that men and women are different.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 02:10 AM
2

Males naturally follow a "winner take all" model. The median male is much worse than average, because virtually all women are attracted to only the few top males. Therefore, since being mediocre for a male is just as bad as being dead last, male genomes have an incentive to pursue high-risk, high-reward strategies. If you screw up, you're no worse than if you had stuck to the safe path, but if you win, you win big. This is completely different from women, who reproduce by default and therefore h…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 10:00 PM
5

Not All Feminists Are Like That
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 09:50 PM
3

Why did you hear about and read Sex at Dawn and not The Myth of Monogamy? Because one of them is a really famous and well liked pop-sci book and one of them isn't. And part of the process which determines whether a book becomes really popular and famous is a filter that the book must fit in a historically tiny range of political opinions. This doesn't seem like a big deal if you are not familiar with Bayesian epistemology (explained in The Sequences), but basically, if there is an optimization p…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 10:48 PM
1

"Conspiracy theory" is really the wrong term for it. Moldbug's Cathedral thesis is not that there is some secret cabal of civil servants who meet every other month to decide in which direction to nudge the universities and the press for their own nefarious interests. Rather, much like evolutionary natural selection or the free market, it is a self-organizing and self-sustaining system which naturally arises when everyone in a democracy follows their own incentives. Konkvistador explains. So, for…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 12:16 PM
1

If you think of Jared Diamond and Christopher Ryan as reliable authorities, I am afraid there are other redpills which you still have not taken (on the plus side, once you take your first redpill, the other ones are easier to swallow). Try Mencius Moldbug's "An Open Letter to an Open Minded Progressive" for a relatively brief introduction. On the object level, I also recommend The Myth of Monogamy: Fidelity and Infidelity in Animals and People for a realistic view of the evolutionary origins of …
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 12:46 AM
2

Exactly. The fundamental realization of the Dark Enlightenment is that all men are not created equal, not individual men, nor the various groups and categories of men, nor are women equal to men, that these beliefs and others like them are religious beliefs, that society is just as religious as ever it was, with an official state religion of progressivism, but this is a new religion, an evil religion, and, if you are a Christian, a demonic religion.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 02:27 AM
3

Have you tried other traditionalist bloggers? I'm rather fond of Sunshine Mary and Free Northerner.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 07:48 PM
2

No. Care to elaborate?
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 06:51 PM
1

This is a classic Prisoner's Dilemma situation. Every guy has an incentive to fuck as many girls as possible, but when all girls are slutty, civilization is screwed. The thing is, if one of them stops, the others just keep doing it. No one has an individual incentive to stop. You need some kind of coordinated effort to make everyone stop at the same time. You know, like back when we used to stone adulterers. Good times.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 09:46 PM
0

This is my first submission to be featured in /r/TheBluePill. Thanks you, guys; I'm honored!
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 06:17 PM
1

While I agree with much of what is said in that blog post, what you say is a blanket statement. And to me, it's just bullshit. I have absolutely no desire to procreate, and I love my craft. And money is all that is necessary to give me the incentive to keep pushing forward. While I don't deny people like you exist, they are in the extreme minority. Most jobs suck, and most people hate their jobs. Without the incentive of providing for a faithful wife and children they are sure are theirs, most m…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 09:00 PM
1

The message I'm getting is this: feminism is actually a good thing unless you want a long-term relationship in order to raise children. You have your causality backwards. Feminism does not cause economic and technology improvement. Rather, economic improvement frees people up to expend energy in holier-than-thou signalling games, which include feminism. Feminism is toxic to societal improvement. Men are the builders of civilization. Without life-long marriage and with no guarantee of paternity, …
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 01:31 PM
6

Yeah, Free Northener is a great writer. He's one of the heroes of the Dark Enlightenment.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 06:33 AM
1

From the same author: Men are responsible for civilization, as is obvious when we observe fatherless children. If men are going to work, invest, build, and transmit civilization to posterity, they need families and security of paternity. Which means that wives have to obey and be faithful. And if women are disinclined to do that, men are going to play video games in Mum’s basement.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 03:30 AM
4

Alexis de Tocqueville had the good fortune to live in a world where North Korea and the Soviet Union had never existed. Nevertheless, the fact that he finds American wanting tells us something.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 04:04 PM
4

Banned on universities? What the fuck? How does that even work? "Brunel has temporarily barred the song from its airwaves and Exeter students have voted for it to be criticised but not censored."
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 03:32 PM
1

The problem is that you can't be praised as a great ethicist if your ethical decisions are just common sense. You need to make horrible, counterintuitive decisions and then defend them with elaborate rationalization in order to signal your ethical sophistication.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:36 PM
2

Multiply the chance that they split up in the hypothetical world by the utility unto me of that branch, and add the probability that they remain together multiplied by the utility of that outcome, and we have the expected utility of living in such a world. Compare with the expected utility of living in this world to see if it's a good deal o not. It seems to me that the probability that my mother would have chosen something as drastic as divorce, if it were still something drastic, is negligible…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 12:26 PM
1

Really? I find that hard to believe. Is that relative to something recent like the 1970s, or relative to historical time periods like the 1700s?
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 12:16 PM
2

I am the child of divorced parents. If I had been born in a world where divorced women were horribly stigmatized and divorce was nigh-impossible, there is a pretty good chance I could have grown up as part of an actual family.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 11:59 AM
1

What are you talking about? Throughout history, even the poorest peasants have managed to live within the institution of marriage and the concept of a family. It's got nothing to do with the lack of jobs and everything to do with the lack of stigma associated with and incentives to avoid having children out of wedlock and divorce.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 11:47 AM
3

Yep. Progressives just don't understand... making life hard for bastards today is what stops bastards from existing tomorrow. Same with criminals. A while back, I linked to a story about a guy in my neighborhood who’s been arrested over 60 times for breaking into cars. A couple hundred years ago, this guy would have been killed for this sort of vandalism after he got caught the first time. Now, we feed him and shelter him for a while and then we let him back out to do this again. Pinker defines …
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 05:10 AM
6

I disagree with the implication. There's nothing in the government unified and coherent enough to possibly be planning this as some sort of grand strategy. It's just generation after generation of politicians following their short-term incentives to get re-elected. A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the mo…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 04:57 AM
5

The point is that you can't give women incentives to be sluts and somehow not end up with more sluts.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 03:07 AM
2

Part 2: The third example I'll give is of changes to the marriage laws, specifically the radical relaxation of divorce statutes during the twentieth century. Divorce, in the nineteenth century, was unbelievably hard to get. It took years, was expensive, and required proving that your spouse had abandonned you for an extended period with no financial support; was (if male) not merely discreetly dallying but flagrantly carrying on; or was not just belting you one now and again when you got mouthy,…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 02:03 AM
1

It's why I tell people that perceived status is what it's all about not actual status. Status is a consensual reality, just like the value of the dollar. If everyone thinks you have status, you have status.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 01:56 AM
2

We live in a world beyond the reach of God.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 04:35 PM
1

Many of them believe we are all born as blank sheets of paper. Nailed it. This is the fundamental tenet of the progressive religion (and don't try to tell me it's not a religion; they may have replaced their churches with universities, but you can still see the priestly class engaging in apologetics, influencing policy, and lecturing falsehoods to their audience). Hence why Mencius Moldbug called it "Universalism". It goes further than gender norms; progressives believe that all children are pot…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 04:07 AM
1

Edit: I am not worried though. I don't believe that you can "learn" to be gay. You either are gay, or you are not. There is no "making you gay" by living with gay parents or something, or watching gay porn or whatever. So how do you then explain e.g. Ancient Greece?
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 03:09 AM
5

Assimilate? Are you kidding? Progressivism keeps telling non-whites to "celebrate" their culture and accentuate their differences and to stop "acting white". And, of course, no amount of assimilation is going to compensate for their lower IQs.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/13 09:51 PM
9

Don't be an idiot. Jews are genetically smarter than other races, so they raise to positions of power and wealth no matter which country they end up with, no matter how much they are persecuted. They then proceed to give the people what they demand, but if it wasn't them, it would be somebody else; the next smartest people in money and power.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 11:56 PM
5

Young widows with children are comparatively rare. The vast majority of single mothers either left their men or hooked up with guys any fucking idiot could have seen were going to abandon them.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 11:41 PM
1

It's always important to remember, though, that this is not some kind of organized conspiracy. It's just a bunch of men following incentives and earnestly believing their own lies. Much like women.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 11:29 PM
1

Not always; in poly communities, like in all other groups, there is always a guy with higher wealth and status than the others. At that point, they become euphemisms for "harem".
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 11:29 PM
2

Yep. It's all about incentives. If you make it even slightly less miserable to be a single mother, then, at the margin, there are always going to be more women who are willing to risk becoming one by getting involved with sexy bad boys, not getting abortions, etc... and when you both remove the shame and subsidize more babies through the magic of welfare, you end up with what we have today; the collapse of marriage and families as an institution. As this article explains.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 11:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter