TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

esantipapa Archive

View 3 posts and 337 comments by esantipapa on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Probably best you don't use "we" given your stance on stereotypes.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 11:04 PM
1

iirc she was (pretty badly) injured on the set of Kill Bill in a car accident.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 09:27 PM
6

FWiw, MGTOW may also include herbivore men. kind and gentle men who, without being bound by manliness, do not pursue romantic relationships voraciously and have no aptitude for being hurt or hurting others. How can anyone be angry at men who choose that lifestyle?
/r/MensRights24/06/18 03:57 AM
2

The deep magic of this show is how it's not-so-subtly conditioning an entire generation of introverts to tolerate insufferable behavior that has always been extremely unhealthy. It's even spreading toxic behavior to people who don't watch it. Ignore the ones that ignore you. You're "lucky" if one person in your whole life chooses you, and doesn't hold back for something more from someone else.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 03:14 AM
1

And that's the hypocrisy. It's hard work providing for a family, especially one that you're not a part of. I'd invite you to consider the possibility that it's more often the case that men are pushed away... not "bailing".
/r/MensRights14/02/18 10:17 PM
6

It's weird how you don't feel the same about the choices of women. And yet, I'm not resorting to calling you garbage.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:35 PM
0

Thank goodness you aren't.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:18 PM
5

A woman would have to choose to be a single mother or have an abortion. Or she can choose adoption. (so many choices!) At any point, sometimes even after the child is born, she can opt-out with little to no "hardship". Guys get no such opportunities AFTER conception.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:00 PM
2

This chain right here, is what I was looking for. Egalitarians finding one another.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:40 PM
2

Was expecting a laugh, but I got practical proctology knowledge relevant to my health instead.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 10:19 PM
0

When I read your comment, you had not mentioned Men's Wearhouse. As far as I know, there are still men's only golf/country clubs in the US - quick google search. http://oobgolf.com/content/fore+play/1-6101-A_list_of_the_remaining_allmale_golf_clubs.html There's probably others, I just don't have the complete list (not sure anyone does). Honestly, I don't see the big deal. Women have gyms like Curves, and men have exclusive golf clubs. Some people are insecure about comingling with other genders …
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:49 AM
1

I think the user meant specialization ("for male customers"), not discrimination. Something that probably should be permitted, maybe even encouraged. Sure, everyone is welcome, but this business tries to focus on X demographic because the workers are trained in serving X demographic's interests. An example is barbershops vs. salons. Men and women can go to either, but there's specialization for specific interests in each. Now there could be a self-fulfilling interests/specialization argument, bu…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:15 PM
1

Yes, that is entirely possible. But I imagine it's rare since only about 4% of fathers take the risk of fighting for custody.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 07:02 PM
1

Often times child support is used that way, especially if the mother (re)marries (not her child's father) and is then further supported by her new spouse's income as well as alimony (possibly from a prior marriage). It's supposed to be for the well-being of the child, but it's basically tax-free cash to be used however the mother deems fit, which may or may not directly or indirectly benefit the child. There's also the added tax benefits, eg. child tax credit, dependents, medical insurance deduc…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 06:04 PM
1

Which interviews? Which experts? Mid 2020s we'll probably have functional nanobots Growth of the market? That's going to help spur innovation and definitely inspire companies to seek other income streams from robots. You may want to attend this conference for a better understanding of the ambition of engineers set to accomplish humanoid robotics. They're trying to get there as fast as possible.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 07:49 PM
1

Nikola Tesla's AC motor patent is dated February 25, 1896. Elon Musk published all of Tesla Motors patents on June 12, 2014 If my math is right, that's 118 years, not 1000. Technological progress is not "really" linear, and accelerating change is a fairly old concept with plenty of evidence to back it up.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 01:21 PM
4

How did you come to the 500 years estimate?
/r/MensRights25/11/16 06:10 PM
2

Reddit shits on democratic socialism? Since when?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/16 04:46 PM
1

Haven't you heard? Boys can't be raped by girls. It's not rape if the perp is a woman.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 03:18 PM
40

Plenty of men work in the kitchen there, and they get paid less. Wait...
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:06 PM
1

It makes sense too, older guys tend to be more confident, accomplished, experienced, etc. All the things females seem to find attractive. Yeah, in a strictly heterosexual sense... male cougarhounds are kinda rare. More rare than female foxhounds for sure, and probably for the reasons you state. But I think those attractions are informed by social pressures (isn't everything). I'd like to see us (humanity) get where we don't immediately judge an older person for a young partner any more than we j…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:49 PM
6

It's appropriate to acknowledge that a young person can have a legitimate, healthy, and intimate relationship with an older person. I agree.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:05 PM
130

I wonder how many likes the role reversal would get, if the teacher guy was hot.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 12:14 PM
1

Womandroids can't get here soon enough.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:44 PM
7

I'm just saying that this quote is not saying that men who die are less victims, it's more saying that the long-term cost of war is carried by women who have to deal with the after affects. If I might... By suggesting women carry the long-term costs of war and have to deal with the after effects, she is implying men are not as victimized by war, when in most cases in war... men die, and if they don't die they are forced to live with the fact that they had to kill people to survive.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:49 PM
10

In context, it's incredibly insensitive to the people who actually die in conflict, and to those who lose their mothers, sisters, and daughters.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:34 PM
11

Some will say that we can’t draft both men and women, because what if a husband and wife from the same family are forced into service through the draft? What if men married to each other are both drafted?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:31 PM
21

they will have to actually offer something more meaningful than just their bodies. I am pretty sure that is precisely what scares the shit out of these women about sexbots.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:06 PM
14

It's essentially an emotional hooker you buy so you can pretend you matter to someone. How is that different from marriage?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:03 PM
6

A robot can't provide the companionship and emotional support that a real partner can. YET.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:01 PM
0

This woman bit a mans genitals causing permanent damage eh... trauma from rape is permanent damage too yo... :/ (it's just the wording of the post, seems to imply comparable severity)
/r/MensRights14/09/15 09:41 PM
1

There is no cure...
/r/MensRights31/03/15 01:37 PM
6

they must be happy and "consistent" at all times. I hate that fucking bullshit. I guess I'm not allowed to be human.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 12:31 AM
1

That's brilliant.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 08:17 PM
9

This is not gender equality, if it were she would also identify as a MRA an egalitarian. I agree completely.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 07:13 PM
1

#WeForAll is a thing. Check it out.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:08 AM
7

feminism "the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men." Also, Wikpedia defines it pretty damned accurately: "Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women.[1][2] This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women." Basi…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:13 AM
17

Her speech included a definition of "feminism" that isn't a definition for feminism. It's a definition for feminism that's cool with masquerading as egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:35 PM
11

Sometimes cynicism is a painfully accurate way to view things.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:54 PM
3

"I'd love to create something like the 'Mary Beard Prize for women online' to support people who are supporting women to be able to use the internet safely" The internet is just as fucking dangerous for men. Two of my good friends (guys) were driven to be suicidal by the same psychotic woman, from her online interactions with them.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 06:58 PM
1

If I'm reading the German one with the naked blonde right, it's decrying the sex industry? legal prostitution? pornography? I can't decipher if they're supportive of sexual liberation (being naked and not giving a fuck) or against it (written message against the sex industry). :-/
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:44 PM
3

\6. It gave men more reproductive control through abortion legalization. wot? That entire article is bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:33 PM
1

That's probably because humanist movements are what most egalitarians tend to support. And try saying "humanism" isn't a real movement.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:25 PM
16

Oggling someone you want to fuck? Check. Doing said oggling with friends while laughing your ass off? Check. Watching sports too? Check Lastly, drinking a beverage with alcohol content? Check. Welcome to typical "bro" behavior ladies.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:48 PM
3

Somehow when women enjoy the icing on the cake it's ok, but when guys do it... it's just wrong. Wot?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:43 PM
10

I have a feeling they'd commit suicide a lot. And probably grow up incapable of expressing anything other than rage or sadness.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:25 PM
5

Transgender or Transexual, depends on the person really...
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:05 PM
10

Listen, guys, I understand how easy it is to get defensive when you feel blamed for something you don’t think you are guilty of. But this is not about you. This is BIGGER than you. The goal here is to make life better for EVERYONE, men and women alike. Discussions to shed light on the topic are the first step. We want to talk about patriarchy/sexism, why it exists and how to deconstruct it, because it hurts EVERYONE, not just women. It's not being defensive, it's legitimate anger. It's "Could yo…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:43 PM
2

/u/Little_maroon_alien actually proved (with sources) that he knew what he was talking about. I think suggesting he has a limited understanding, when he demonstrates a vast understanding, is very insulting, and adds nothing to the conversation except one more ad hominem.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:18 PM
0

Nah.. ad hominems definitely will.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 11:31 AM
3

eventually... how many guys are avoiding degrees now simply to avoid all that bullshit?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 10:35 PM
34

The wife’s stupidity and misplaced unwavering loyalty are a running joke through the performance John C. Reilly... that made me realize you were talking about "Chicago". Yeah, Chicago is a seriously fucked up story, but I think the bigger thing the play tries to highlight is that lawyers and journalists don't give a fuck about you, unless they can make a buck off of you.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:08 PM
2

Yes. But it just seems too... heartless.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:53 PM
2

That's a completely different psychopathic computer... you monster.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 01:51 PM
5

His suicide note has gone completely viral, anyone who wants to read it, can easily access it in millions of places online. Also, FUCK VIRGINIA FAMILY COURT. It allows shameful, criminal people to practice law and keep conflicts going within families to make money. My ex wife's attorney was under investigation during our divorce, and was disbarred a few months after. It's apparently quite common. Starting retainer $5k, that's just for consultation. Fucking lawyers... nothing but leaches.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:53 AM
10

I was in this guy's shoes (going through divorce in Virginia, and lost my kids)... for a very long time. The only answer is not to play. I picked up and moved away from them. Only way to survive in the face of complete oblivion. Run.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:50 AM
1

Wow... California is behind Virginia on this... I've never gone into a men's room without a baby changing table, in Virginia. They're everywhere.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:52 PM
3

How great would it be for the MRM to start the whole white feather thing up again, but giving the white feathers to feminists who have spoken out against a gender-neutral draft?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:22 PM
1

exposes more of the tip, increasing pleasure during sex That is completely untrue. Removing the foreskin removes about 1/4-1/3 of the nerve endings of the penis which are used for sensing pleasure. They're both really shitty, backwater archaic traditions that no civilized nation should practice.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:04 PM
2

Girls have the exact same problem when they have larger labias, but we don't remove those compulsorily... it's the 21st fucking century, can't parents just teach their boys, just as they teach their girls, to clean their genitals thoroughly.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:15 PM
4

Why so sensitive?
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:13 PM
7

You don't get the nerve endings back. Those are gone forever (or until stem cell treatment matures for such a procedure).
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:10 PM
2

How long do most women keep a good bra? My guess is far longer than 7 years.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:52 PM
1

Your machismo is a bit too sensitive hombre.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 06:14 PM
1

Then don't like it, but try a little bit to understand they're not doing it FOR you, they're doing it because it's the decent thing to do in almost every case.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:22 PM
4

women need it more because they're weaker and more readily assume that you WILL hold the door Wouldn't want to perpetuate benevolent sexism... or anything. So just hold the door for everyone because it's the decent thing to do, not because of chivalry or anatomical disadvantages. No one gets hurt by doors, and ladies still feel important. It's win-win yo.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:37 PM
6

I usually say... "I got this" or "I got it" and things work out ok (no fear of getting my ass kicked). For some reason, when you're that person who takes responsibility for the safe passage of others, things tend to work out.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:36 PM
1

It's significantly less hyperbolic/inflammatory. And if you wanna get technical, it can be used to also include male-haters who aren't feminists (so it's slightly more broad, but that's a good thing, since it puts feminists under a label with a several other anti-male leaning groups, that feminists may not want to be associated with).
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:56 PM
1

There is a word for that. Misandrist.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:51 PM
0

Thank you for getting it. It just devalues the discourse, however accurate the comparison happens to be.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 03:24 PM
1

If you just say feminazi it's not a Godwin. Ok, got it. Saying feminists are like Nazis, however does. Also got it. Feminazi is just a portmanteau to get the idea across, it's not necessarily a comparison. Huh? Using the portmanteau to convey the idea that Feminists are Nazi-like is not necessarily Godwin'ing a thread? Isn't the means of conveyance just as important as the idea you are conveying? By your rationale you can tack on Nazi to anything and it's not "Godwin'ing" anything. Organazi. Nop…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 03:17 PM
12

I dunno, that term "feminazi" is used too much. Feminuts just sounds better and it doesn't Godwin the thread.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:21 PM
1

Still in context... You fighting through a war and you get shot, or blown up, then you're bleeding to death thousands of miles from home, scared, confused, wondering if anyone gives a shit that you're about to die, wishing you could see your parents or kids or wife again, one more time... or is a letter from the military stating that your loved one has died in action worse? They both are horrible, but but but... the poor wives now have no one to support them /s right ? Nah, death is much worse i…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 06:24 AM
2

I have tried to respond to this several times... but I can't quite write a even-handed response. War means something completely different to a soldier. It's not trivial. It's not a topic to casually throw around who is and who isn't a victim. Our enemies are victims. Our enemies families are victims. In war, no one really wins. But this intellectually lazy suggestion that those who die in warfare (civilian or soldier) aren't victims is madness. Yes, once they are dead, their suffering has ended.…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 06:07 AM
1

Exactly, given the context... dismissing their loss (the most permanent misfortune possible) by suggesting survivors are the real victims of war is preposterous. They get to keep on living.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:57 AM
2

They lose their comrades, years of their life, their mental stability, and endure physical pain. Absolutely! The shakes. Shellshock. Battle fatigue. PTSD. There have always been labels for people who are mentally destroyed by war. Nah... Hilary says let's think about the people who are the "real" victims of war.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:54 AM
1

Death is the most permanent misfortune anyone can suffer, is it not?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:45 AM
5

The people who die in war, aren't victims? Why don't you chew on that for a bit. That's like calling any tragedy's survivors victims, but not those who died in said tragedy. So... New Yorkers were victims of 9/11 but not the people who died? wtf is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:49 PM
37

Hilary's is particularly insulting. Women are the real victims of war, seeing as they lose their husbands, fathers and sons... WHO DIED IN WAR. How much more can you lose than your own life!?? Fathers, husbands and sons are the true victims of war, since they, ya know... get killed and maimed, while women don't even worry about getting drafted, EVER.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:25 PM
6

Inside the store, during business hours (not in a back office or anything), sure, that's public enough.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:18 PM
1

Read the law a little closer. Taken as you state it, it would forbid just about any form of undercover journalism. They were careful in these states to add a "public" clause, to ensure any recordings can be made where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:13 PM
1

That's probably the best plan. Make sure you record somewhere that is completely public, where the recording can be demonstrated to be captured in a place without any expectation of privacy. (Maryland is an all-party consent state, except in situations where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, eg. in public)
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:10 PM
6

That's not technically true according to Maryland law, if the conversation happens in public, there's nothing wrong with recording it. It's only when there's a reasonable expectation of privacy, eg. recording a phone call, recording at a private residence, or any place where reasonable privacy is expected. At a place of work, where it is public and people are going to and fro constantly, one cannot have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:09 PM
7

Who died and left feminists in charge? Obligatory, the patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:14 PM
2

don't want that... and aren't attracted to Mr. Moms.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:43 PM
1

hopefully I guess someone has to make the first move.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:41 PM
2

Historians that are scientists are called archaeologists (or anthropologists).
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:32 PM
10

Pack up your shit and leave her dude. There's no apology great enough for that. She ended the marriage that night. Before you know it, you'll find someone new who appreciates and respects you (enough not to use violence in a disagreement).
/r/MensRights27/03/14 07:26 PM
2

The "movement" is to organize atheists who wish to stop being afraid of Xian hatred/persecution of atheists, and it's been going on for several years now... ever since "The God Delusion" was published and several other notable novels (Letter to a Christian Nation, God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything, and many more) specifically urging atheists to not be afraid of Xian persecution and to stand together, out in the open, and support each other in doing so.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:17 PM
27

Having met the man several times, I can say I genuinely feel he is not a creep. He's just a little shy about random people strolling up to him and asking him stuff or trying to touch/hug him (who wouldn't be?), but really, probably the nicest man you'll ever meet. PZ is actually kind of a dick in person (met him too), though cordial, he's all about the photo ops and publicity (and almost always is like "did you buy my latest book?"). I feel he rarely opens up the way Dawkins does. (this is all j…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:10 AM
9

Exactly... move along.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:44 AM
71

Ha... Melody Hensley, finally people are seeing through her bullshit too. 'bout goddamn time. I also want to say... fuck Rebecca Watson. Seriously. Elevatorgate proved she has/had absolutely no trust in any unknown-to-her male atheists. This statement she made, proves that she is a genuine misandrist. If I, a liberal, science-minded skeptic, atheist dude... don't toe the line she draws in the sand, I'm "worse" than rape threats... holy fucking hell, it's abundantly obvious she really hates nearl…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:38 AM
3

Is there increased sensation? I mean... are we talking about regenerating nerve cells in the foreskin? That's kind of the only thing that matters... otherwise this is just cosmetic surgery with fancy buzz terms mixed in.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:35 AM
3

Then why not put it in the statement? "consent can be withdrawn at any time during sex" Without that, it makes it seem like even after the sex, the person can withdraw consent.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:33 AM
22

Did I have a choice about my circumcision? Was I a child when it happened? Was it beyond my ability or comprehension to stop it? Has my body been permanently altered without my say so? Have nerve endings been removed from my otherwise perfectly functional skin? Will I ever be able to recover the feeling cut away from me? Her lack of perspective and empathy is alarming. Boys have societal acceptance and praise of their abuse... no one jumps for joy or says it's no big deal when a child is abused,…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 09:44 PM
3

The colloquialism "damaged goods" implies that they are possibly unstable or mentally ill. It's no more demeaning than saying that they are "broken" which for all intents and purposes, some of them are just that. "Very passive-aggressive largely due to being raised with a very aggressive parent." "Currently living with ED-NOS, major depression & severe anxiety disorders, PTSD, body dysmorphic disorder and various other chronic conditions, both mental and physical.Dyscalculic and dyspraxic, and l…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 09:39 PM
2

That's simcity quality writing right there...
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:38 PM
6

"In the United States, the Congress is prohibited from passing ex post facto laws by clause 3 of Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution. The states are prohibited from passing ex post facto laws by clause 1 of Article I, Section 10. This is one of the relatively few restrictions that the United States Constitution made to both the power of the federal and state governments before the Fourteenth Amendment."
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:10 AM
3

We're already there... http://www.amazon.com/Men-Strike-Boycotting-Marriage-Fatherhood/dp/1594036756
/r/MensRights04/01/14 02:40 PM
2

Par for the course... helps to tack on, "My pleasure!" or "It's no trouble at all!" (subtly channeling the "It was my privilege" meme)
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:33 PM
2

Put some 'tussin on it?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:30 PM
3

We pay taxes. Later... And this is why feminism encourages independence. That way a woman can have her own career so she wouldn't be compelled to marry just for money and have to listen to the "bitching" of some chauvinistic asshole who comes home and "bitches" why the candles aren't properly aligned at the dinner table. Then "bitch" slaps his wife, rapes and beats her, after which she goes to police...only to be told by the pig 'Stop bitching and complaining. Least you have a roof over your hea…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:19 AM
1

Nice phrasing of Hanlon's razor... I see it in so many forms all over this sub.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:14 AM
1

They're too busy being fucking awesome.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:09 AM
10

"Is it any wonder why non-religious guys don't want to get married anymore? Dear Christ." And with that... I would love to buy her a drink. We're fucking done, ladies. You want a nonreligious man to marry you? You better get off your ass and work as hard as we do to earn your love.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:05 AM
1

Ok, if you read the opinion pieces... http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20060321.html (opinion) The court case related to what she's discussing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubay_v._Wells (legal precedent) Which would be the men's equivalent of "Roe v. Wade". That's pretty concrete.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 05:59 PM
1

Yes, I got that. I guess I just wanted to make sure it made sense that a person would get the (legal) latitude to move on from a family that they're (legally) not a part of anymore. Gatekeeper parents do some painful shit to the parent on the outside and there's literally nothing they can do about it once they sign away custody or have custody taken away from them by a court. Why should it be expected that a parent continue to try to be a part of their child's life if the other parent has cut th…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 03:56 PM
1

I thought this thread merited cross posting. Most of the advice is pretty much "take him to the cleaners..." or thereabouts. http://www.reddit.com/r/Parenting/comments/1r56mr/single_parentshow_do_you_do_it/
/r/MensRights21/11/13 10:24 PM
1

Whatever the case, children deserve better than a mother that doesnt care about them in any way. You mean like one that aborts? or abandons the child under safe haven laws? or gives the child up for adoption without consequence? You do understand what "equality" means, right?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 10:17 PM
3

This is a good starting search for you... and it is a topic in legal discussions in many states
/r/MensRights21/11/13 10:04 PM
1

I would say most would, just to be safe.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 10:00 PM
1

Some would not want a relationship with the child if the mother is not in their life. And what's wrong with that? Why should they waste their time and money and life on a family that fell apart?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 09:59 PM
1

A guy will not be able to do this after the child is born period. That's where I diverge in agreement. As a sole custodian, women can give up their children for adoption.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 09:54 PM
3

without a condom. such effective so much workings never breaks
/r/MensRights21/11/13 09:49 PM
2

That's like saying you're being forced to buy every other medication your insurance covers. ...that you happen to not use, or not have a use for.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:59 PM
1

I hope you all don't bash the concept, but would any of you guys put a bumper sticker on your car that just says "On Strike" turning the O into this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_symbol ??
/r/MensRights30/10/13 05:33 PM
5

I'm 5'7" and I get short guy hate all the time... (It's the current average male height)
/r/MensRights02/10/13 06:51 PM
3

Sniper two here... admist amidst
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:38 PM
2

wreak havoc...
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:34 PM
19

Quite literally.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:52 PM
-3

And none of them are even close to the realm of 18-21 years of involuntary indentured servitude. I also didn't mention the zeroth option... the morning after pill. Another option that men don't have.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 04:12 AM
4

It's not a risk women ever face... and that's precisely why there is inequality. Unmarried woman and man have sex, and there is a conception... Options for woman: [edit]- zeroth option - The morning after pill (no consequences whatsoever, except an early period) Abort/terminate. (no long-term financial responsibility & no consequences for the sex) Carry to term and give up for adoption (no long-term financial responsibility & few short-term consequences for the sex) Keep. Options for man: Pay ch…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:35 PM
18

The best legal recourse I've read about is taking her to a lawyer (of her choosing), and getting a support agreement (of zero dollars from now until the child is 18) signed by her and you, and get it notarized/registered with a local court. Also helps to throw in a clause for mandatory requirement of blood testing (paid for by the mother) for any changes to the support agreement. Of course, all she has to do is refuse the legal consultation and refuse to sign the document... and she can rape you…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:31 PM
45

Despite her boyfriend's reluctance, Lee planned to have the baby. This is the part that pisses me off the most.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:08 PM
5

Can we all agree to a very simple rule to not breed with or date women like this or who express anything like this?
/r/MensRights29/08/13 06:11 PM
2

This issue pops up every few months... It's a market, legal systems won't have the power or ability to get sexbots banned, because it's like banning a monitor screen or printer. Manufactured, non-lethal hardware is somewhat difficult to convince people to ban... that said, they could tax the shit out of it, making it prohibitively expensive (like fuel-efficient foreign cars). It's gonna happen. As soon as computing capacity and advanced microrobotics catch up in a public sense to where cellular …
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:48 PM
2

Maybe if we say... "I think this is rape" three comments in a row?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:42 PM
2

If a man using a sexbot is cheating, then a woman using a sexbot is cheating too. That's a slippery slope for women, it could lead to a ban on vibrators.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:40 PM
16

This really helps - http://imgur.com/jtNKuFM
/r/MensRights22/08/13 10:00 PM
2

Verbing a noun is a pretty common practice. Table, Chair, and Light come to mind... light a cigarette, table the motion, and chair the meeting.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:13 PM
1

I can't even measure the irony level of using "healthy dose" in that sentence.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:47 PM
9

Further proving that duckduckgo is better than google.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:52 PM
1

Not the only guy she's harassed about coughing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv_zqQ8uYHM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePHX9sGrcsM She also harassed a woman about coughing at her: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVvC62b_ZrY So... someone said she forgot her medication in the above video and later just laughs at her as he strolls away: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh-GfCkdIoQ A woman security guard at a bus terminal shut her bullshit down: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG5rlGlW_UQ A much bet…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:57 PM
2

Moustouché... that's crazy to believe that people actually believe that circular and insane logic... it's like believing God loves you, but puts you in a world made to tempt you and eventually kill you, so you betray his love or sin (which you can't escape anyway), and get sent to hell forever, but it's all good because no matter what God will still love you. Stockholm syndrome en masse.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:14 PM
1

Equality. That's basically how it works. You hit, you get hit back... your gender is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:10 PM
3

The much better position, picking a side (MRA, men's side, or Feminism, women's side) is a bad idea. We all need to stop taking sides and stick to egalitarianism at our core, being neutral and genuinely kind to any gender/identity.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:39 PM
1

Then what the fuck is the use of patriarchy theory? It clearly isn't the root cause of anything other than rustled jimmies.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:36 PM
3

That's probably the most succinct way to explain that phenomenon. It's alarming how many of "them" just don't get it.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:35 PM
1

At that point, I'm all... http://i.imgur.com/zFfOcbH.gif
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:32 PM
0

Really, this is just as offensive to women... it's assuming that only women should apply for a job to serve food.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 10:31 PM
6

That's what I find to be totally ridiculous... middle-class, white women/girls SJW-types couldn't give two shits about what happens to a middle-aged latino man like myself... "Oh you're a heteronormative man? STOP OPPRESSING THE SNOWFLAKES!" But trust, oppression hits me like a fuckin' brick. People see my last name on a job application, or online, and it's instantly, "Dirty mexican" bullshit. Oh you need help with your taxes, "Stupid beaner". Trying to start a small business? "No thanks for you…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 10:25 PM
3

Any list that puts Carmac at 61 deserves to be disregarded outright, I bet they put Ken Levine at 73 or some bullshit.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:25 PM
6

Yep, the overly-sensitive direction... inner dialogue of the developer's mind... "Well, guess we're not going to be a creative shop anymore...Better get my resume ready, this place is sinking...*"
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:24 PM
5

You're not less of a man than uncircumcised guys... and yeah, you really are feeling less (the nerve cells you had there were removed and thus you cannot feel as much as someone WITH those nerves).
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:09 PM
1

/r/mgtow also, just sayin'
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:26 PM
1

bloody hell... they did that? That's horrible.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:19 PM
1

Jesus never married. We probably shouldn't take marriage advice from Jesus. Nor should we take advice from a guy who marries a nine-year-old.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:46 PM
1

If Nujood's experiences are an accurate representation of Islam, then clearly the FLDS is an accurate representation of Christianity.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:43 PM
1

Ahem...
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:33 PM
2

Tron: Legacy
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:28 PM
1

If female-only gyms build one locker room and don't build facilities for men, it's the exact same situation.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 11:22 PM
2

Significant bullshit at 1:53 on the reversal... she's just incapable of understanding how it's a double standard.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 10:09 PM
2

Therein lies the rub. No, she really doesn't. If that's the case, since all of this is speculative, I think it's better for them to split simply because he'll never live down such a change in his desires in life. She'll never stop resenting him for not having/wanting kids and "trapping" her in a marriage she doesn't want to be involved in.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:22 PM
0

If the genders were reversed, I'd maintain the same position... because a relationship that makes people happy can easily withstand not adding more responsibility. He doesn't owe her children. And if the roles were directly reversed... she wouldn't owe him children either. A relationship should not survive when it requires one partner to give up something so important and so wanted, something that partner entered into the relationship for the express purposes of achieving that goal. I agree. If …
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:04 PM
1

My premise is that a relationship should be allowed to survive that does not add more responsibility to each partner. How is adding responsibility ever equivalent to not adding responsibility?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:31 PM
1

Not have kids. Why is that such a bad thing? If they truly love each other, and want to be together... staying together should be more important than having children. Especially if they make each other happy... they're throwing away a good relationship for something they could easily do without.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:06 PM
1

Maybe I'm weird, but one of the first things I ask about when curious about dating a woman nowadays is if she is a feminist. If she is... I think I generally lose all interest. My theory is that if enough people did this kind of check... we'd be on the right path to sorting out this equality thing.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:21 PM
3

The shocking bit is how easily women are willing to give up on and end a marriage. I guess nothing is sacred anymore.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:45 PM
1

No... male and female fitness standards are dramatically different, and range in difference for each service branch.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:12 PM
2

Then the US Army/Marines/Navy/Air Force is discriminatory...
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:38 PM
1

In many cases, I think they don't realize all of the risks. Try telling a guy reasons why they shouldn't love a girl and logic them out of it. You definitely can't. Love her? Sure! Go for it. Just don't marry her.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 03:30 PM
2

On your point eight, I'd wager that boys/men can have a more fulfilling life as a single person... a result of technology and ease of access to information/entertainment/wealth. The benefits to exploring their own interests and expanding their mind, solo, are far too abundant to compete with women... you read about the complaints of "lazy" men who don't want to elope... kidults and man-childs. There's just far too much competition with enjoying their life to see partnering and family as anything…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:33 AM
1

Thousands of people think they find someone worth it every year and file for divorce... why risk it? the risk does not outweigh the potential "reward", boys and men need to wake up to that fact. They don't realize they can have a very fulfilling life without getting sucked into marriage, and some of us know it, and we're spreading the word.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:22 AM
7

Because when men speak up about marriage, it's misogyny... we're just whiny little punks who can't man-up and commit to one person... (I don't know, I have no fucking clue why guys don't speak up on this, it's not like they'll be labeled anything that fucks with their self-image or ambitions in life)
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:43 PM
5

So your relationship is an outlier, it's not the average (or general way things turn out for people who get married). Positive outliers happen, just as much as the horror stories happen. Good for you two. I think the premise of these generalizations is somewhat lost on you, seeing as you have already gotten married, while cohabitating beforehand. Single men who are financially independent, have no incentives to marry, as you and your husband did: technically it helped with our taxes awesome comb…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:30 PM
0

Assuming you're a heterosexual couple, and you're the woman... of course you have nothing to complain about... Are you certain he hasn't lost any friends? Are you certain he is happy with how much sex you're having? or if it's good enough? Are you sure "nothing" has changed between long-term dating and marriage? (besides the obvious legal upper-hand you have on him should you have children together)
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:12 PM
1

So, which "generalization" do you see as false, in your case?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:07 PM
1

:/ You haven't been married, have you?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:05 PM
4

Not necessarily... the respect bit, Husbands and Fathers are pretty much universally portrayed as bumbling morons, goofy and incompetent (needing a women to solve their moronic ways) in popular media. The sex bit, was true in my experience (and from what I know of other married folks' sex life, it is generally true). I can't explain how many friends have "vanished" into the marriage void. You have to share all of your space. "Your" space doesn't exist anymore, it's all shared. Same thing goes fo…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:53 PM
5

I just wish there was a better way to convince younger guys to avoid it so that they don't have to keep reliving the same mistakes over and over. What needs to happen is a testimonial source, easily accessible to boys and young men, that explains the kinds of reprecussions of marriage. I'd write my own (fucked up) story on that site, and I bet a lot of men who have had shitty deals in marriage would too.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:20 PM
41

You'll lose respect. You'll lose out on sex. You'll lose friends. You'll lose space. You could lose your kids, and your money. You'll lose in court. You'll lose your freedom. Single life is better than ever. Yep... marriage isn't a good deal anymore... why the fuck would I want that? Ever?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:43 PM
5

Several states have common-law marriage laws. Typically it's cohabitation with the same address for ~seven years. Congrats, you're married! Here's your marriage license and a bill for it!
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:41 PM
2

I wasn't only referring to him... And stop bullshitting... the cynicism comes in with referring to women as "vagina owners" instead of as women. I'm sure there would be problems with referring to men as "dick owners" however anatomically correct that statement is, it reduces men to their relationship to their genitals.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:00 PM
1

Oh man, that's so cool...so I guess this is the LEGO® version of minecraft on steroids?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 08:33 PM
1

Are you aware than in D/s relationships the one with the most power is actually the submissive? Yeah, that's not common knowledge... as it turns out.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:00 PM
1

If you make that deduction, you're not really good at logic. You're suggesting that /r/MensRights = MRM That couldn't be further from reality. Nice try.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:30 PM
2

Lego Batman, Lego Indiana Jones, Lego Star Wars... All good times to be had with your son or sons, as it supports four players on some platforms/titles.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:11 PM
1

You're complaining that a silly book title is a problem. You're complaining about people complaining that a silly book title is a problem. Not gonna say you're more ridiculous, but it sure looks that way.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:07 PM
7

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Emotional_appeal http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special_pleading
/r/MensRights05/06/13 08:53 PM
16

Interesting tidbit: Again, the anger is palpable. Someone or several someones have hurt them, harmed them, or used them, and instead of just admitting to that and going back into the market, they define an entire social world that is out to get them. Couldn't that be said of feminists and "patriarchy"?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 08:45 PM
1

Maybe I've been watching far too much Mad Men, but this commercial feels like Don Draper wrote it. It tugs at the heartstrings, causes that pain of nostalgia.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:35 PM
2

/facepalm... The games she refers to portray (almost universally) any violence against women as a despicable act of villainy... acts of villainy the hero then has to avenge, correct or stop... If she wanted games to help stop violence against women, most of these games already do a pretty good job in hijacking male minds to see violence against women as the act of a criminal, demon, evil spirit, bad guy, and/or foe. Ultimately, it teaches boys/men to oppose anyone who commits acts of violence ag…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:26 PM
5

Thing is, some of us activist leaders were ahead of the curve (the infection of the atheist community with radical feminism) but we were largely ignored and ostracized... and ridiculed. So we left, and said fuck it, why burn myself out all the time (interviews, traveling, tabling, sponsoring/hosting events) when I'm just gonna get called a misogynist rape-apologist or worse? I used to be a board member of a 501c3 that does just what you want... hang out together and talk about cool stuff (and dr…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 08:35 PM
2

This has been happening for years... probably since about two years ago. They're (radfems) slowly creeping their way into powerful positions within the activist community of atheists.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 08:25 PM
2

TIL outspokenness and attraction = sexism Thank you interwebz.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:49 PM
13

I have never before seen grown men that don’t want to ask women out on dates, don’t open doors or pull out chairs while on dates and expect women to pick up the tab. Men have to risk rejection, waste our time to open doors and pull out chairs... and spend our cash... ON THE CHANCE of mating. No fucking thank you. Teach them the finesse and charm necessary to attract and keep an amazing woman because at this rate, we’ll all remain single! Maybe these women aren't so amazing after all.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:31 PM
1

You kind of rationale allows the Westboro Baptists to shout obscenities at grieving families... not saying it's wrong, but it's the fucked up side of free speech.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:44 AM
1

That kind of attitude forces not-so-ridiculous people to abandon public space to avoid association with ridiculous people. Not cool either.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 04:57 PM
1

The thought has come to mind, but in that situation, I think the law of numbers will come into play... two or more people suspicious (and assholes) of me... I'm gonna lose that argument fast. They'll put my kids in the car, ask me personal questions, ask them... it's pretty shitty.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:31 AM
1

Really big dicks... with warts.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:29 AM
1

FoS shouldn't be thrown out, but people should probably realize that their jokes and accusations can hurt people. I think outlawing speech is ridiculous, but so is being a dick to a dad who loves his kids.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:29 AM
1

Because accusations lead to law enforcement. It's not like someone hasn't been wrongly accused before. And I'm affectionate with my sons, I give them hugs and kisses. I think it's really shitty that if I am affectionate with my sons, people think they can accuse (and involve the police). And it's even shittier that you think I shouldn't protect myself from such accusations by changing my behavior.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:27 AM
1

Yes... you win the context aware-award~!
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:24 AM
1

No, I didn't break down in front of my son. Thank you for your flagrant emotion-shaming though. How dare a man cry in front of his child in public! Oh the humanity!
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:23 AM
2

It was also proven during the trial that her broken finger wasn't caused by Travis (it was a prior injury), the anal sex was consensual and enjoyed (and she had and continued to have that kind of sex with others). I'm fairly certain the defensive knife wounds on Travis also dismissed that "linebacker" shit in the trial. Please try to remember the undeniable fact that she was found guilty. The fact that she previously denied him ever abusing her is proof she changed her story to fit a narrative t…
/r/MensRights24/05/13 10:19 PM
2

Yep.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 10:07 PM
36

As a father, who has taken his sons to the park... and who has had a hard time with this kind of thing... I can assure you. It happens often. And the result is pretty shitty, I broke down and couldn't bring them to the park anymore.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:41 PM
1

Holy moly... thank you for posting this. I never would have found it otherwise.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:54 PM
20

It needs to be said. That kind of civilization would be easy to conquer.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:44 PM
2

The OP's thread, and this one you mention have something in common. Both would be incredibly easy to conquer. They don't know how to fight.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:33 PM
18

Voice your anger... don't play the hypothetical game of "if the genders were reversed, it'd be off the air" game. Start here: https://www.facebook.com/SamsungUSA
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:15 PM
8

Well... guess I'm buying Sony products from now on. And I'm gonna trade my Galaxy S3 phone for an HTC as soon as fucking possible. Thanks.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:05 PM
3

Ok, I'm searching... "First Week In" by Discovery Channel. There's no synopsis on IMDB, there's no episode list on Wikipedia... I'm actually startled that this isn't being better documented by the internet.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 10:28 PM
1

Or elbowed her in the face... (like this nsfw)
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:11 PM
3

Wasn't intending defensive tone with the last thing, just silliness (overly sarcastic I suppose, sorry for the mixed signal). But don't you think that there is a difference between medical procedures which are performed to control sexuality, and medical procedures which incidentally control sexual experience. Yes, I think there are, but let's not confuse the two very separate issues. I think it's fair to say circumcision's incidental side effect is only incidental as a result of how ubiquitous t…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 12:02 AM
3

If girls were given mastectomies with as much ubiquity as boys are circumcised... it becomes tradition. I think the control of the sexual experience would be seen as incidental to the procedure's use for medical health at that point. Also, the medical benefit of circumcision doesn't outweigh two things... bodily autonomy for one, and the right to fully realized sexual pleasure (i know, how dare I suggest a man's health suffers so he might enjoy his life).
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:11 PM
2

Arguments have been made that FGM is used a social form of control over female sexuality. However, that doesn't seem plausible in regards to the prevalence of circumcision in the 21st century. Except... she overlooks the undeniable fact that removal of the foreskin reduces the sensitivity of the penis (and thus is an indirect form of social control over male sexuality). The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia have written that the foreskin is "composed of an outer skin and an …
/r/MensRights17/04/13 09:05 PM
3

I'd rather play video games into my eighties than date any of these women... at least the games won't judge me for enjoying my time.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:02 PM
2

Correction... Steam.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:58 PM
1

Given Bitcoin's recent self-immolation, this is kind of irrelevant now.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:32 AM
32

Seriously... what possible good could come from what they did? Not joking, I really want to understand the logic behind such acts.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:09 PM
2

Yep... pretty much.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:06 PM
2

It's good you're apologizing, but you shouldn't have to. Clarity is worth reposting with the right title. Thanks!
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:48 PM
2

Should be standard practice on this sub.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:47 PM
16

As a man, I have never been so insulted in my life. I have to change who I am... to accommodate the insecurities of women I may never actually date. Let me pose this, very simple alternative... if women didn't set the bar so goddamn high, men might actually want to show the fuck up.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:38 PM
3

Ah.. the old "Anita Sarkeesian" route to fame.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:32 PM
2

What can we do about women who abuse these privileges, and the men who assist them? I believe the best thing is to reject the "patriarchal" male values of "protect and provide'. We as men should no longer view our own worth in terms of our utility to women. We should no longer accede[sic] to unreciprocated demands to appropriate our resources, nor to unilateral impositions of standards on our social behavior. And surely these values are outdated in a world where women are independent enough to g…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:08 AM
1

That's a slippery slope when it comes to larger scale objects. For example, we can only observe one universe, yet observation cannot be taken as proof of existence because we are incapable of knowing otherwise.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 09:42 PM
9

"The greatest thing that males have to fear from women, is rejection." Many fear losing our kids to spiteful exes. Or fear losing a lot of our income to greedy exes. Or fearing for our lives (ending up like Travis Alexander and many others). Or having our sex organs cut off (Lorena Bobbitt and many like her). Or fear that we may be dating a crazy who burns our home down. Or fear that she'll cry rape when it was actually consensual and be fucked over whether acquitted or not.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:17 PM
2

http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/misandry?q=Misandry http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/british/misandry?q=Misandry http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misandry Top three dictionaries of the English Language... methinks she has no clue from then on in the video.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:08 PM
23

This has got to be the best example of a post getting "Poe'd".
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:43 PM
1

Isn't it kind of obvious... ? Vanity. Women today have such high standards that very few men actually meet them.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:47 PM
1

I'm very much a feminist. I'd say not all MRAs are misogynists, but many misogynists call themselves MRAs. And not all feminists are misandrists, but many misandrists call themselves feminists. That's pretty fucking cool, coming from a self-identified feminist. Openly admitting the association with misandrists is very bold, and yet, while true some MRA's are misogynists, I've yet to see ONE feminist who doesn't consider all of the MRM to be completely guilty by association (that usually where th…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:34 PM
8

holy crap... those commercials are ancient... gems: "Ugly women treat you better." "Poor men treat you better." While the discussion is predominantly hetero (the 90s of course)... the gold digger and the PUA are kind of disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:18 PM
2

We can be shitty at math together :-)
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:27 AM
2

My math was all fucked up anyway off by a minute. The plus 35 makes sense now, yeah (2:10 is right).
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:15 AM
2

I think the lesbian in the white shirt was rather reasonable and patient, and tried her best to keep cool despite the aggressive language and dismissive attitude of the people talking over her. Good for her.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:50 PM
3

Nah dude, fair's fair. Let the ladies go as topless as men go.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:21 PM
2

Really good people... wishing for others to die...
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:57 PM
3

Her time: 2:26:08 Mose's time: 2:09:43 Her time - 18 minutes = 2:08:08* Difference: 0:01:35* Any runners here? Was he close to overtaking her? *edits for my shitty math
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:22 PM
1

Yep. Can't disagree with that. Reversal, if you're a hetero guy... imagine what you consider to be an unattractive woman asks you to her room for coffee while riding the elevator. She'd be just as impolite IMHO, and the situation would be just as awkward...
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:03 AM
1

Oh snap... HD rerelease :D got to get that!
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:34 PM
1

they're remaking it?!
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:26 PM
4

hhhhshhhshh.... Woman, felt uncomfortable, while being asked to "go have coffee" in some dude's room, all while "trapped" in an elevator... the unnamed dude, when turned down, left it at that. Fact is... it was impolite... whether it warranted her video that passively insulted all men who might otherwise have better manners, it just goes back to how some feminists see all men as potential rapists and not getting how unbelievably insulting that happens to be.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 02:25 PM
7

It's the schism between New Atheism and the feminist invasion of New Atheism... google it dude. "Atheism plus" or as I've dubbed it "Atheism doubleplusgood"
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:49 AM
11

Did you jump ship after elevatorgate? when that Atheism+ stuff came around?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 08:47 AM
20

I'm am so GLaD thunderf00t took a stance on this... I hadn't heard his position on that Atheism+ or whatever it is... but this kinda puts him out there, now it's a matter of what the doubleplusgood Atheists decide to say in response.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:58 AM
2

So... I never thought I'd ever utter such a thing but... I love this JudgyBitch.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:43 PM
3

You.... YOU.. I like you. That's 100% right. Learn it yourself and make a name for your work. Jobs kinda pour in after than.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:41 PM
1

People pay to learn Ruby On Rails? That's weird... Ruby is easier to learn than the English language and Rails is crazy intuitive. Why would anyone pay for something they could learn online for free with a little persistence?
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:33 PM
1

Guys... come on... this is the internet, stop being lazy. Start: What does religious tolerance say about "Baby moses" laws? [they do good research on laws] http://www.religioustolerance.org/saf_have.htm Some infants have remained unadoptable -- in legal limbo because there is no way to contact the other parent for permission to give the baby up for adoption. Cool, now what does the law say? What, a website dedicated to the actual laws? http://www.nationalsafehavenalliance.org/states/ There are s…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:57 PM
1

Turns out there might just have been a common misconception about the definitions... this whole argument reminded me of this incident with Al Franken and Tom Minnery http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPhTtPnGzug There's some people laughing at the head of Focus on the Family, about the idea that a "father & mother" definition of nuclear family, when in reality the answer is... two parents in a stable, healthy relationship are better than one.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:12 PM
2

Whoa... Dr. Janice Fiamengo is amazing, thanks for this. I'm gonna search for her work and publications now...
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:04 PM
3

If you care to read Thomas Ball's last statement: http://freekeene.com/2011/06/16/thomas-james-ball-self-immolated-in-protest-of-the-justice-system/ tl;dr: He was a father who lost custody/visitation, then got royally screwed over by our justice system, and was almost jailed when he lost his job and couldn't pay child support.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:37 PM
3

I rarely get to use this.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:05 PM
1

hiyooooo!
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:03 PM
1

Is that not fundamentally messed up? This image sets the expectation that men should cling to a woman without reservation about their devotion. What woman actually wants such a mindless boob? It also sets the impression that women aren't genuinely satisfied with their partner, and their devotion is optional. If you're angry at him, why are you WITH him?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:10 PM
1

Just for you... http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/81752461/
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:54 AM
1

Reminded me of this Louis CK bit... she doesn't even have to wear revealing clothing... http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/81752461/ (sorry, for some reason it's not on youtube)
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:54 AM
3

This guy, moi, would be flattered. And probably blush a little. But as a die-hard philogynist, I'd probably not reciprocate.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 11:20 PM
4

Nah dude.. that's shaming. Not cool man.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 11:16 PM
40

Really... I cannot be the only guy here who has been meat-gazed and eye-fucked by a woman... and not the subtle glances either... the dead-eyed, train-wreck stare that makes you feel incredibly awkward.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 11:15 PM
3

He has some legal options... if he lives in the right state and wants rights. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putative_father_registry Demanding a 50% custody arrangement is his surest way to reduce his CS obligation to zero... his gf may end up owing him CS if she makes more. Depending on the state, he may retain 50% custody and the child may or may not have to spend something like 181 days minimum with him (he may be able to have less time). If he wants nothing to do with the child after he/she i…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:12 PM
13

Former self-loather... growing up without positive male role models, are the subjects of abuse in the home, did they struggle with the opposite sex throughout their lives... Yes. I had one positive male role model out of seven pretty bad ones (step-dad[abusive], uncles[thieves, liars], and my own father[walk-out]). What's worse is I had no one to teach me the kind of women it makes sense to be attracted to. It's taken me 10 years to figure it out on my own.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:56 PM
7

You will find very little empathy in front of a judge in family law court. You, meaning "men".
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:43 PM
5

As a pretty crazy aside to this conversation... what would zombie games be like if you played from the zombie point of view? /mildlyinterestingquestion
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:41 PM
2

It's pretty easy to deduce... well, the relevant facts. Prior to recording, she had punched him (her reasoning for the off-camera punch is somewhat irrelevant). On camera, you can hear him explaining... "You punched me, that's cool, do it again" he shows his cheek. She does... he hits her right back (not too hard really... he looks like he could have hit a lot harder). Lots of shock and amazement that he defended himself that time. He probably didn't want an assault charge, so he was patient and…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:26 PM
1

It's the assumption that men are objects that can be abused whereas women are not. The fact that they (women) see me (a man) as an object that can be abused without consequence... freaks me the fuck out.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:23 PM
1

objectify* (right?)
/r/MensRights11/03/13 07:17 PM
2

Yes, it's for US citizens to petition our executive branch. Sorry, but thanks for showing interest!
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:46 PM
1

Additionally... Anita overlooks the G.I.F.T.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:21 PM
1

Right on. This was a memory issue for me, fair use sure does cover that.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:17 PM
1

And would you feel the same way as you feel about what you are doing in this thread if you heard someone preaching about how the holocaust wasn't all that bad? Godwin /thread Good call.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:11 PM
2

Awkwardly strange and useless commentary about a forum community that is more inwardly critical than any existing internet forum community (that I know of...).
/r/MensRights11/03/13 01:51 PM
1

?? I don't follow... (maybe you put this comment reply on the wrong thread... ?) I was just curious if she needed releases for footage from the games she mentions. On content, I find it odd that she sticks to Nintendo too. Ubisoft is a pretty big deal, she didn't reference the newer Prince of Persia (where the Princess basically tells the Prince to fuck off, that she's got this, and is a critical playable character). That's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how wrong she is on message…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 10:15 PM
1

Won't this ironically make it easy for rapists to find victims??
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:07 PM
1

FTA = Let’s face it: feminists today are pretending to fight wars that were won long ago. Clearly the world isn’t perfect; but women in America are equal under the law; they have access to all the educational and professional opportunities men do; and, as AEI’s Christina Hoff Sommers has argued, if anyone is hurting these days it’s boys and men. That's the truth right there... feels good to see it at Forbes.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:42 PM
2

Did she get Nintendo's permission to use footage from their games? I mean... DMCA is kind of serious... if Nintendo wanted to, they could get her videos taken down pretty quick.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:36 PM
2

So... take a nap. It helps.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:26 PM
1

You won that bet.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:24 PM
1

For women, every refusal shakes the rickety feminist scaffolding that allows us to vocalize our desire to have sex in the first place. That is the price of sexual self-determination. Grow the fuck up. If you can't legitimately seduce your man... then HE isn't the problem.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:08 PM
4

She might just be really bad in bed. That's definitely possible, and fits the cases she outlines...
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:56 PM
22

These are men who have previously made it clear that they enjoy having sex with me: boyfriends, guys I've been dating for a while, men with whom I regularly bump nethers. Maybe you're not as good as you think you are in bed... just a thought. You guys have feelings and problems and hungers that sometimes take precedence over boning. Maybe you had too many beers and are experiencing acute alcohol-related performance anxiety. Or maybe your not-in-the-moodness has to do with something bigger: the u…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:53 PM
52

Of course I’m exaggerating. I don’t think I personally know 200 men that I find sexually attractive. Dripping with contempt for unattractive men (reversal... a man with this level of contempt for women would be seen as incredibly sexist). Now one could argue that men being more thoughtful about sex, rather than being the selfish entitled asses that they have traditionally been is a feather in feminism’s cap. So that means you get to be just as much of an entitled ass? Way to be progressive! /s B…
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:50 AM
3

Generally speaking... prostitutes don't allow their work to be filmed. Actresses require it.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:16 PM
2

Pretty sure most of the serious pornstars register with SAG.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:15 PM
3

that was the idea... apparently honest joking is irrelevant to equality
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:12 AM
1

That's precisely what I was thinking... Wait.. women have moms. Wait.. women have daughters.. Wait... some women have wives. That's pretty inclusive, perhaps a better thing to add would be "husbands, fathers and sons" ?
/r/MensRights16/02/13 12:09 AM
1

Totally agreed, that's probably how this is going to play itself out.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:28 PM
1

I can't find any relevant information regarding the owner of the equipment, but I can't imagine how that would matter. Copyrights are only concerned with the resultant work and who created it. http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2011/01/11/quick-tip-add-copyright-info-to-your-photos-exif/ Exactly, if the guy created the work... and embedded copyright info right into the photo... that's pretty much airtight. He won't technically need a release if he has no plans to SELL the photos. http://en.wiki…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:00 PM
1

brofist Right, in the case of Star Wars, that sounds like both a trademark dispute and copyright problem... usage of the symbol, logo, distinguishing characteristics, distinct inspirations... the law is pretty clear, don't fucking do that. I imagine a lot of modders just have a stiffy to want to get around that. Anyway... Well, educational in that they'll learn never to do it again... ba-dum-tsh... Two things are being assumed about all of this that should probably get out of the way... We're as…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:05 PM
1

(web dev here... ran a publishing site once, this area of law is murky at best because it's meant to be vague intentionally) except where protected by Fair Use. Ok... The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes clarified - Since the photos are not published in a co…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:04 PM
2

Let's get this started... unless it exists somewhere already?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 05:56 PM
5

She really should shut down those assholes she works with... when they say... "I could have figured it out without the help of a woman... " she should curtly respond with... "Clearly, you couldn't... asshole." Might want to add that while she's damn decent to you, it's all advice that had it been coming from a guy to a* raped woman would have been seen as pretty fucking offensive. edit typo*
/r/MensRights15/02/13 05:38 PM
2

AFAIK, if this is an open public event at a public university... there are no laws protecting the university's anti-recording stance... even if they had policy or rules or whatever... they're not legal. OP should have bucked the system and recorded anyway.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:59 PM
2

Why aren't we petitioning the White House on this? https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:20 PM
1

This is one step removed from a legitimate concern for some people... What if you're good at giving but your partner sucks at it?? or their mouth is too small? Break up with her because she can't fit your junk in her mouth?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:25 PM
1

Well, in a way... some do (if they're moms). When you're getting to know her ask how many kid's she's had. 2 or more kids, ok, naturally? C-Section? How big were they? oh my! 10 lbs!! he/she must have torn you!? Ask that stuff man. You're showing interest in something she experienced, curiosity about her kids (talk about your own if you have 'em) and getting useful info that will give you an idea of how well put together she is down there. She might even throw it out there that she's been all ab…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 10:26 PM
1

Total broner.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 10:14 PM
26

We might actually get some accurate stats about male rape for once... (my first thought). My second thought is take it further... why isn't it rape if a man is forced against his will to penetrate someone's mouth, anus or vagina? Include that too.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:56 PM
3

It's too bad there isn't a website for men to register their status as "going their own way" and swearing off marriage... so there could be a running total. Look at the men who have walked out... see that number? It's just going to go up.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 07:35 PM
1

Thanks for looking up the laws... and providing links. That kind of honest criticism is important when someone makes a claim you think is absurd. I applaud your diligence. The masons... I have a good friend who left the masons after becoming an atheist. He feels there is a new kind of inner circle forming between atheists in positions of power and influence.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:51 PM
2

That's really not much of a correction... considering even some scholars who believe the book of lies known as the bible doubt the divinity of Jesus. he was the Son of God Let's suppose for a moment that you're right. What you're saying is akin to saying (as far as I'm concerned) Thor was the son of the elder god Odin... as if it's well-known, indisputable fact. While your statement is internally consistent and a fact within Christian mythology, it makes it no more applicable to reality (or this…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:44 AM
2

Not that I'll change your mind As if that's not the least bit passive aggressive... (suggesting you can "change" other minds, but not mine) Make a logical, reasonable argument, and you will change my mind. Don't presuppose my position is staunch simply because your position is. I was simply correcting one CORE component of my faith to hopefully whittle away one other misconception. What misconception?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:38 AM
0

You're right. You didn't change my mind. What a quaint fairytale you must live... enjoy.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:04 AM
2

Her personality does add that x-factor, doesn't it? I agree completely.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 09:48 PM
2

Let's not forget that she's beautiful too :-)
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:55 PM
-2

Hurm... * let me expand on this for a moment... one, I see I'm getting downvotes, no complaints there... it's highly unpopular to call out Xians for their misogyny, even more so on an MRA subreddit... but let's examine this for a moment, Jesus (a man) dies for the sins of all of humanity. Can you come up with a more disposable use for a man than to "save" all of humanity from a made up illness? So... hurm. You probably can't, and don't agree that it is a "made up illness". No need to drag this o…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:40 PM
14

There are still like seven states where atheists cannot legally hold public office. Yup - http://deathandtaxesmag.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Athiests.jpg
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:16 PM
-3

Christian Egalitarianism Interesting... went to the wiki page on it... just because my skeptical sense was tingling... Christian egalitarianism (derived from the French word égal, meaning equal or level), also known as biblical equality, is a Christian form of the moral doctrine of Egalitarianism. It holds that all human persons are created equally in God's sight—equal in fundamental worth and moral status. This view does not just apply to gender, but to religion, skin colour and any other diffe…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:07 PM
3

Probably the best damn suggestion here. Record it and ask friends to ask candid, honest questions... then post it to youtube (with your school's permission of course).
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:16 PM
2

That's kind of the point. Perhaps a better wording... "It's kind of simple. Both ideologies represent extremes. And extremes are (usually always) bad."
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:56 PM
-5

Christianity (the ideology) can be quite misogynist and that's something egalitarians are against. Feminism (the ideology) can be quite misandrist which is also something egalitarians are against. It's kind of simple... extreme ideologies typically end up hurting people. Edited for clarity... and because you're all so damned sensitive about your book, see tyciol's post below to get a taste of the misogyny in it. I appreciate MRA, but not at the cost of associating with people who believe in the …
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:18 PM
2

I think the abusive boyfriend thing has been mentioned in the courtroom, also that she was afraid for her life (or something like that). I've been following it like any other news story, so I haven't really looked into it all that much, but of course the only people with all the facts are the jurors. I really just wanted to find out what the other (IMHO) sensible people in this subreddit are thinking about the controversy/trial/incident if they are paying more attention to it than me.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:03 PM
2

Are you saying that men suffer more mental trauma than women? Because that is how it has been coming across. Wow. Does she realize how shunned men are who even consider telling anyone they might have been "raped" by a woman? They can't confide in their friends (shamed as a weakling) or parents (shamed as promiscuous) or if they have a girlfriend (accused of infidelity)... or police (not taken seriously) or counselors (would they believe him?). Holy fuck. edit: Of course, I also realize women fac…
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:38 PM
1

Isn't that true of any infinite timeline ...that the possibility of just about everything (anything) approaches 100% ?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:03 PM
3

Gem FTA: Consider the higher rates of suicide among men, and ask yourself, would a more realistic emotional sensibility help that? If men were taught to deal with their emotions, to express them in a healthy way rather than hide and bury them, would such help men become better people? Ridiculing men for having emotions ... guess feminists can't keep doing that?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 07:03 PM
2

susanthe ‏@susanthe INeedMasculismBecause the feminists tell us to build our own shelters for battered men.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:50 PM
2

Anthony ‏@creatureanthony INeedMasculismBecause there are nearly zero consequences for domestic violence by women.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:48 PM
2

Keir Cooke ‏@Khoryos INeedMasculismBecause "My body, my choice" doesn't apply to infant boys.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:44 PM
4

Please, don't trail off, explain.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:19 PM
2

Goodness gracious, you need more upvotes...
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:16 PM
9

As a former activist in the "New Atheist" movement, you are 100% right... the entire relatively collective consciousness of the "New Atheist" movement was hijacked by radical feminism... and that happened as a direct result of the "elevatorgate" debacle, which literally forced organizations to take a position (pro or anti female).
/r/MensRights08/02/13 09:43 PM
2

Why don't businesswomen wear neck-ties with their suits? It looks great and classy. I have always wondered about this... Women look super professional with ties, from my google-fu finds... weird. Very weird.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:37 PM
1

I don't think people are taking your opinion seriously because they themselves have not served. (US Army vet) I can second your assessment. Unless the PT tests requirements are identical for both genders, there will always be the assumption that female soldiers are less capable than male soldiers... Therein lies the ultimate paradox... do we lower the standard so males and females testing requirements are equal (thus proving females are less capable, but this will be at the cost of lowering the …
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:22 PM
3

I am having a very hard time envisioning Mads as my nursery school teacher... generally, that dude gives me the heebie-jeebies.... that said, I'm curious if he, as an actor, was capable of pulling it off in a believable performance (ninjaedit - nevermind... dude totally nails it - http://www.thehuntfilm.co.uk/)
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:37 PM
9

FANTASTIC video :-) humanity might have a damn chance...
/r/MensRights29/01/13 11:06 PM
5

holy crap... wtf is wrong with this woman?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 07:56 PM
3

post it everywhere that women might be... /r/feminism /r/GirlTalk /r/TwoXChromosomes /r/feminisms /r/AskFeminists /r/SexPositive /r/GenderEgalitarian There are a lot more... post it to them all...
/r/MensRights25/01/13 06:55 PM
2

To conclude, i just want to say i believe in empowering women. You're part of the problem. LMFTFY To conclude, i just want to say i believe in empowering good people regardless of their gender.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:47 PM
2

It opened me up to the idea of just going my own way in life and buck the idea of fulfilling my gender-mandated role in society. brofist... good on ya for coming to that on your own
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:45 PM
1

Trust has nothing to do with it, plenty of people go undiagnosed and asymptomatic for years...
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:38 PM
2

STDs ... worry your ass off.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:47 PM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:28 PM
1

I had a misty moment... followed by a "hell yeah!" Thank Nintendo, hallowed be thy game.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 03:44 PM
4

Zelda... Samus... Makoto... Claire Redfield... Alyx Vance... Chell... I am now aware of Anita, but really... what is her actual gripe? Does she think men aren't sexual objects in video games? Pretty sure the fact that most video game men are fit and hugely muscular contributes to some serious self-image issues with some guys.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:13 PM
2

They're a circlejerk and they're proud of that fact...
/r/MensRights22/01/13 06:17 PM
1

Nevermind those pesky STDs or crazy women who like to screw up your life... your dog will comfort you... with fleas and ticks. Now stop complaining about activists not bringing attention to issues you care about! /sarcasm
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:50 PM
0

The same way we do it now... there would be "persocom" stores that look like bars and dating services,. They are really just like apple stores for humanoid computers. You come in, find a persocom that happens to "like" you... and buy it. Easier than dating.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:16 PM
0

I wanted to say this outright, when I said I'd opt for it (to your skepticism of men giving up on emotional connection)... you really need to see the anime "Chobits" too. If they're not just sex-toys, if they're fully-functional high-performance computers, geeks and computer enthusiasts would choose them OVER women any day of the week, and twice on Sunday. Why pursue ANY human woman when you can easily purchase a "persocom" that can do more than human women are ever capable of doing? I mentioned…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:02 PM
1

I was thinking the same kind of thing, the Rita Haybot
/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:36 AM
2

"Sexbots are not a replacement for a good woman" Why? I think the terminology is pretty much the only limiting feature here.. if it were CompanionBot or PartnerBot then "sex" is only a tertiary function and then the relationship and companionship is the primary function (a better use of the technology, as it increases in realistic performance).
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:19 PM
2

(American middle-aged male here) I would... anyone else?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:02 PM
1

If current policy/law is any indication...(eg. lolicon) I'm guessing such child-sex-bot models will be banned as well. Which really doesn't make any sense... why not prevent the exploitation of children by letting the sick fucks do what they want with things that AREN'T ACTUAL children in the privacy of their own home?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 09:08 PM
5

Pretty much, the "persocoms" in that anime do quite a bit more than cook, clean and bath themselves. They are fully functional computers and sometimes act as personal assistants, media devices, web browsers, file storage, printers and can be "networked" with wires or via wifi.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:36 PM
2

I think... Sexual Marketplace, but I'm guessing.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:31 PM
3

Check out the anime "Chobits" they'll just be made water tight, and need baths.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter