TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

eskamobob1 Archive

View 0 posts and 159 comments by eskamobob1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I noticed you didnt answer my question. Let me ask it again How do fortune 500 executives are somehow relevant to upper management of micro companies singling out employees based on sex? And a mcro company is a company under 25 employees
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/20 12:04 AM
0

Why should you have an opinion then? You are quite clearly too mentally deficient to give an opinion of your own as well. Tell me again how fortune 500 executives are somehow relevant to upper management of micro companies singling out employees based on sex? Because if you are going to keep trying to change the topic you need to show it is a relevant tangent.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/20 11:57 PM
3

Also if we had propper stats for random vilent crime. Just like with rape, most violent crime is very targeted and not just spur of the moment" lets go stab this dude"
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/20 11:54 PM
2

Lol. I just said I have only worked at small companies and you think I was somewhere that was even publicly traded (much the less a fortune 500)? Also, yes. Most owners were dicks to some extent. That doesn't explain why I was not belittled and my female colleagues were for similar quality proposals.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/20 11:50 PM
1

I havent worked at particularly large companies, but its never gone particularly poorly for me. Sometimes you pitch something and get a flaw pointed out, but I've never had real worse than that. I have certainly never been belittled lie I have watched female colleagues be.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/20 11:47 PM
0

I honestly don’t think male privilege exist. Watch a girl try and pitch an idea in a directors meeting in a stem field. There are 100% still massive areas where women arent taken seriously even in the west. Both groups have good parts and bad parts about being one of them.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/20 11:42 PM
1

There isnt one. Plus hell, the main girl is advocating something we shoudl all agree with. The negative stigma around getting mental health help has a massive effect on the ridiculous rates of male suicide and homelessness.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/20 08:20 PM
1

they have much lower rates of consmption tbf
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/20 08:19 PM
-2

You cant get your broken hand fixed right if you never tell someone its broke
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/20 08:10 PM
5

It literally does by the definition of the word. Just because the law is objectively a good thing that is universally agreed upon does not mean it doesn't limit freedoms. Feel free to find me a definition for "freedom" that shows otherwise though.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 08:15 PM
2

The elementary school logic that words have meaning? Ok man.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 07:46 PM
3

No. It is recognizing that words have meanings. Sometimes we need to make stuff illegal (like, you know, murder). That doesnt mean you arent removing freedoms (the freedom to kill others) by doing so.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 07:34 PM
1

Im realy glad you decided to edit out your pseudoscience. If I made you reflect enough to do that it means we are making progress. And if you had listened in science you would know technical posibilities does not mean something has or ever will happen. Monkeys on a typwritten and shakespear and all.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 07:23 PM
3

If you make something illegal you are limiting freedoms
/r/MensRights09/06/20 07:16 PM
2

Okay, enlighten me scientifically. Provide me a legitimate source that states you can only get STD through sex specifically. The fact that you dont even know how burden of proof works further demonstrates your lack of education. Not only did you apparently not get sex ed (wont blame you for that one since it can reasonably be assumed your state doesnt provide it), but you skipped science classes too (which I will blame you for). I'll play along anyways though. https://www.allure.com/story/can-yo…
/r/MensRights09/06/20 07:11 PM
1

"This" in response to me gramatically implied me. Only if you have a persecution complex and assume people are mocking you. Normal people use second person pronouns to describe the person they are responding to in comment chains
/r/MensRights09/06/20 06:57 PM
2

not how scientifically correct it is. Whether you actually get STD out of it doesn't even matter. Yes i does. How scientificaly correct you are matters a lot when you try and make scientific claims. Your entire edit is full of false information and if you dont want people calling you out for lieing and being ignorant you should remove it. Until you do so and show that you have thought about the fact you demonstrably know nothing on the topic you will continue to be shit on. I really don't want t…
/r/MensRights09/06/20 06:51 PM
2

Seriously man. Just leave out the edit and I am 100% on board. Include that and you just went from 'I am not the most libretarian person in existance' to 'facts matter so little I am probably anti-vax'
/r/MensRights09/06/20 06:47 PM
1

Sure, maybe I exaggerated the STD par Saying something false isnt "exagerating" it is "lieing". I agree people shouldn't be outside in their underwear. Thinking that you can somehow get an STD from someone because they are in underwear shows your lack of education of the topic.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 06:31 PM
3

Legaly mandating dress absolutely has to do with freedoms
/r/MensRights09/06/20 06:30 PM
2

Unless you're arguing that everyone can walk around in their underwear, but that would surprise me. Why would that surprise you?
/r/MensRights09/06/20 06:28 PM
2

Yah, until their edit. Holy hell.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 06:27 PM
1

You went from "well written and fairly common opinion" to "batshit and uneducated" in just one edit. I am truly amazed
/r/MensRights09/06/20 05:49 PM
2

I take back my initial statement. I thought you weer taking such massive shits you litteraly couldnt do with a single flush to get it all down and was fairly concerned
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 06:51 PM
1

I was always under the impression the courtesy flush was so it didnt clog
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 05:20 PM
1

If you leave your piss driblets on the rim of the toilet (not even the seat) you are just vile.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 05:06 PM
2

Its an act of rebellion because he simply loaths the idea of possibly being courteous to a woman
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 05:04 PM
0

wait, what? When did I say shit doesnt smell?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 04:58 PM
1

you need to eat better if you need to courtesy flush....
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 04:35 PM
2

Oh no! Someone called out the sub I like for blatantly being a shithole! Lets call them names!
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 04:27 PM
5

There is none. This sub is just /r/hatewomen
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 04:35 AM
-3

Hang out around these parts. You can make it a routine if you want
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 04:30 AM
1

Liking to pee sitting down makes this guy a simp. Sure.......
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 04:29 AM
5

Also, if we are being real here, if you dont close the top before you flush you are a fucking animal anyways.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 03:52 AM
-1

If you live with someone who pisses with the seat down, you have to piss more often than they piss, you shit, and they shit combined for that to matter
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 03:45 AM
-3

You missed my point too. Down isnt "for female convenience" its litteraly just the most common orientation that is needed.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 03:05 AM
-19

The default setting of everything isn't to fit female convinence. Unless you shit with your ass directly on the rim of the toilet, the seat needs to be down for more situations than it needs to be up
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 02:12 AM
32

Everyone who doesnt close the toilet completely before they flush is disgusting. CMV
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 02:10 AM
-4

Its a joint account that the share. How the fuck is she not entitled to her portion of it?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/20 12:52 AM
9

Ive had it happen once. Once. She was such a cunt about it too I just laughed. Other than that ive never even been asked by the pregnant or elderly
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/20 08:07 PM
3

What I'd like to see is a company protesting by making all their bathrooms unisex Honestly man, im in cali and idk I have seen any place without like 5+ stall bathrooms not have them all be unisex in months.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 05:31 AM
3

Oof. Forget to switch back accounts?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 10:06 PM
1

Wait, what? How would making a nee account make PPD not show up on the front page?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 10:05 PM
5

I did leave. Then bulshit like this still ends up on the front page. Filtering a sub is when it bad enough to put it the fuck down instead of just leaving
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 09:33 PM
7

This isnt actualy even PPD.... Im seriously getting ready to filter this sub. Its all just /r/MurderedByWords or /r/rareinsults (and same quality as those shitholes) anyways
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 08:16 PM
10

No. Just scared of anal fissures.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/19 04:28 AM
17

battle tops Sounds terrifying tbh
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/19 04:15 AM
21

Believe all women when giving them emotional support and help, not legally.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/18 12:34 AM
15

I mean, she was charged and jailed for it at least
/r/PussyPass13/10/18 08:34 PM
4

IIRC it is because it happened in a state where rape requires being penetrated but there is a similar crime of similar sentencing for being forced to penetrate that she got charged with. That said, its been a while since I read the article, so im not positive
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:20 PM
1

I litteraly said I don’t think it’s unfair to blame them for night fighting it.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 02:08 PM
1

mind pointing out where I said it was equal? I just said it wasnt femenists that pushed the law. Hell, the ammendment that allows for jailing over child support was written and passed by a republican majority house and senate and only had 16 fucking votes gainst it total.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:34 AM
1

I’m not sure I have ever met someone that argues nestle isn’t the product of true capitalism tbh
/r/MensRights19/09/18 11:53 PM
3

So stupid you don’t even know what LSPR stands for Expecting someone to recognize an acronym, idiom, or term only used in very specific small groups only shows your own ignorance narcissism.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 10:21 PM
0

It certainly happened, but it wasn’t marxism but communism
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:56 PM
1

Communists, maybe, but I don’t think there has ever been an application of Marxism on a wide scale.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:47 PM
-2

Exactly. I don’t think it’s unfair to blame feminists for not fighting the massive inequality the system creates, but they didn’t realy play a role in the creation of the system in the first place
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:46 PM
7

That’s not quite true. The Old Testament outlines a method of abortion to use used in trials of infidelity
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:41 PM
42

Lol. You say like abortion and access to birth control haven’t he fought against for 50+ years.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:38 PM
81

It’s not feminists, just a gov that wants a little responsibility as possible. Litteraly the entire reason child support exists is because the gov doesn’t want to have to pay out to support kids
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:52 PM
0

I never once said it doesnt exist. I countered your anecdote with my own to show it is not always as common as you had claimed.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/18 08:13 PM
1

Lol, you are right, I did assume the first. Since you “run the place” I just assumed you were constantly drowning in drowning in all the booze and pussy they were growing at you. Not a clue in hell where you got the he second one, because I never even mentioned being continuously drunk, but if that’s your style, god bless I guess. Either way, I hope you have fun $100% of the time with all your super cool strangely relevant friends man.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/18 03:20 PM
2

Directly from your post: 2 months later? Guess what? These girls go and tell the school administration that they were raped. You yourself said the memory wasnt relevant until 2 months out.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/18 04:28 AM
1

Honestly man, Its probabaly location/university/frat size. smaller frats at my school? Typicaly charged for cups, but you had to know someone. Larger frats? Not a chance in hell. Even being best friends with the president it was a toss up. I think the only uni I have been to where this didnt hold was chico, and I am fairly sure thats just because every frat there was tiny. What I can say with certainty though is that this is not common at major schools in the south, midwest, or even the large sc…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/18 02:20 AM
0

i ran shit there lol. Good to know man. Glad to hear you have exciting stories. If you wouldnt mind telling me though, I would love to know how you manage to have an absolutely perfect memory of events and people even while drinking that lasts several months out. Seems like a usefull skill
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/18 02:07 AM
3

Nice to know the sub is nice and unbiased in what it upvotes /s
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 11:15 PM
2

realy like this bot.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 11:12 PM
-8

Im from LA and have also lived a solid portion of my life in Tennessee. Also, your second story is hard core /r/thatHappened or massive projection of what you wanted it to be. You are claiming that you not only saw the specific incident twice, but also remember exactly who was involved on not only one occasion, but two? Also, frats almost nowhere (especially not UofM or Midwestern) allow random ass people into their parties (since you hate frat dudes, so im not assuming you had someone let you i…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 11:11 PM
1

I mean, not realy at all. There are over 4m kids born a year in the US. Thats 6x the total AIDS infected population every single year. Not exactly a small chance.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 10:07 PM
1

Tell that to the hundreds of socialist college proffesers https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61 So yah, if I ever meet the 0.06% of college profesors that d that I will tell them to fuck off (assuming my grade doesnt rest on their opinion of me) But for real, why would you just assume I would be Ok with those people either? If im paying for you to educate me in math, you best not be taking up my time with completely irrelevant topics or opinions even if I agree with them. Outside of cl…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 10:04 PM
2

But catching aids is also ultra rare but those same folks call you stupid if you have sex raw. You may just know very different people than I do, but most people I know avoid raw to avoid kids, not aids.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 09:54 PM
-1

But you did misrepresent my argument with your algebra example in order to say that my argument was fallacious. You took the logic of my argument and misrepresented it by taking advantage of false equivalence, and used the conclusion of your false equivalence to imply fallacy in my original argument. How did I do this? Here is your intial statement. Your parenthetical point is strange, because to them college is, quite logically enough, relevant to the SAT. I specificaly said: If your job is to …
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 09:47 PM
-2

I was just countering his anecdote with one of my own.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 09:33 PM
-21

I have never met someone IRL that has been falsely accused of rape, nor had it even come up about and acquaintance of an acquaintance. While certainly scary, it’s not as common as you make it out to be
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 08:03 PM
-2

First off. Your example is a straw man You obviously have 0 concept of what a straw man actually is and I feel like someone coaching SAT should probably know that, so here: strawman You misrepresented someone's argument to make it easier to attack. By exaggerating, misrepresenting, or just completely fabricating someone's argument, it's much easier to present your own position as being reasonable, but this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine honest rational debate. Example: After Will said th…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 07:39 PM
3

The stats as far a legal cases are easy to find (and posted above), but these cases often only go through trial IX tribunals and hearsay that don’t care about the truth but simply public perception, so stats for those don’t even exist.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 06:49 PM
-18

While I agree with the general sentiment that this sub is basically just /r/incels now, you ignore a couple big points including gendered definitions of sexual assault/rape and as well as title IX trials on college campuses. The first one is rather self explanatory (in many parts of the US rape still requires forced penetration), but for the second, in case you didn’t know, college campuses hold their own tribunals in cases like this that very often require 0 burden of proof and often result in …
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 06:48 PM
-3

How is my parenthetical point strange? Algebra is also extremely relevant to college, but that doesn’t mean it belongs in an English class. It’s like saying that because gay marriage is an inherently political discussion, it is now relevant to all political discussions to ever happen.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 06:43 PM
-6

If your job is to teach math, physics, or (in this case) SAT prep and you rant about political opinions (or any opinion completely irrelevant to the topic really) you are attempting to indoctrinate people.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 06:31 PM
0

Masculine vs feminine traits literally are just traits typically/classically associated with their respective gender. Thats just the definition of ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’. It doesn’t mean the other gender can’t have those traits or that they are inherently good or bad (almost all traits have good and bad parts after all). There is most certainly toxic femininity as well. For example, homemaking is undeniably a classically feminine trait. When that is taken to the extreme and it is imposed tha…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:08 AM
0

I at no point said it was men though. I just said that not crying ever is an example of a stereotypically masculine trait, that when taken to the extreme as was common for a long time, has negative consequences.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 05:52 AM
-2

No. I was using them to refute your idealized version of them
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:31 PM
-2

You quiet literally just explained the problem though. These masculine traits lead to severe complications when no exceptions are allowed to them. Yes, it is better to be the confidant go getter at work, but that doesnt mean you cant vent to your SO outside of work. Also, no, women dont tend to want the bulletproof man. Ever read a Nicholas Sparks book? The 'perfect' men in those books all have a week side. They simply overcome it to be with the girl. Same goes for literally every movie characte…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:44 PM
2

I mean, yah. Part of this is due to ‘toxic masculinity’. The pure idea (that many of us grew up with) that men are not allowed to cry is a great example. Never have a chance to release or talk about your emotions? Seems like a great way to let them build up until something as extreme as suicide seems viable
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:58 PM
29

That simply not true (and plumbers typically make good money in the us anyways). Several parents at my HS the wife was the major breadwinner and the husband worked part time or a lesser job. It's to do with individuals, not women being needy like you want to imply
/r/MensRights08/11/17 08:08 PM
2

Pretty sure trumps campaign was the last one to delete emails that had incriminating information in them. But don't mind me. I'm just remembering Trump calling a convicted child rapist a "Terrific guy" and saying "he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
/r/MGTOW17/10/17 07:31 PM
1

Then my comment about where the GOP is hypocritical is still relevant even though you blew it off when I originally made it.
/r/MGTOW17/10/17 07:21 PM
4

Lol. Trump has more allegations against him than Bill Clinton does. Not to mention fox news (basicaly the conseravtive god network) had to get rid of one of their oldest and top members because his decades of sexual assaults and harassment became public knowledge. Both parties have scumbag sexual predators high up within them. Not acknowledging this fact is simply willful ignorance.
/r/MGTOW17/10/17 06:50 PM
6

Yah. It not like the GOP has ever talked about morals. You know, like being the family values party, fighting abortion purely off of moral premise, or even insisting their moral definition of a word (you know, marriage) should be law.
/r/MGTOW17/10/17 06:13 PM
2

Wait. What? Republicans didn't show themselves to be hypocrites as well? That is just willful ignorance.
/r/MGTOW17/10/17 04:55 PM
16

Praise is only for the insecure? What?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 06:08 PM
12

In the source video he asks her to stop throwing stuff in a rather exacerbated manner directly before she tosses it at him. Clearly north kid is in the right here
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/17 04:47 AM
16

The boy asks her to stop throwing stuff at the beginning of the video. Could well be the 20th time on a 3 hour bus's ride. We have 0 idea.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/17 04:45 AM
17

Interesting how you skip the part where he tells her to stop throwing stuff at him
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/17 04:43 AM
3

Plus look at the top comments. Full on TRP. Shit is ridiculous at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/17 04:46 AM
10

A trap is only a trap until you know it's a dude
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/17 04:46 AM
1

Or the ideal feminism was founded upon.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/17 01:29 PM
7

Agreed. That's why I don't think it's a big thing to have largely anti-nutjob-feminist content. IMO that is pretty vastly different than being against the overall notion of feminism (putting everyone on the same playing field) though.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/17 05:11 AM
12

It's been anti feminism for a while (which I don't think is necessarily bad as lots of the criticizm is valid if the nutjobs), but now it has a decent incels crossover which sucks
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/17 04:58 AM
43

Flat out, yes.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/17 04:57 AM
26

That's why you fucking never sign the certificate unless you are positive. For real though, you should be able to be removed from it if you find out you are not the biological father
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:25 PM
34

Yah, that's some extra bullshit. If we are doing child support always go with the biological parent of its possible. At least then it's consistent even if still ducked up
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:08 PM
13

I must have missed that part of the article. All I saw was that the monther claimed he was the father in court and he had 3 child support payments taken out. I didn't see anywhere that he was actively living with and supporting the child as a parent
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:07 PM
6

Completely agree. The system needs some serious work with loopholes like this existing
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:02 PM
194

This one is largely a Texas thing. Most states do not allow for someone non-blood related to be liable for child support unless they were an acting parent for several years. But yah, the whole system is stupid fucked. The payment money can be used for anything, people get fucked by it like this guy, and it largely exists because of people's complete ducking aversion to welfare programs.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 01:53 PM
891

TL;DR Child support came out of 3 of his paychecks ($50 each time) 15 years back. Because he didn't fight it, he is on the hook for all of it now according to the state (Texas | no shocker there). When fighting it in four this year he got a DNA test that showed the child was it his. Texas is likely considering him the primary 'father' because of his previous child support payments using the same laws that are generally applied to stepparents after a divorce (where one can be on the hook for chil…
/r/MensRights19/08/17 01:37 PM
3

I mean, are you in SA? Cause I'm pretty sure that's a social proximity thing and I don't exactly think they have tumlrs
/r/MensRights18/08/17 02:46 PM
6

Pretty sure scumbags in SA smirk when that shit happens too.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 01:13 PM
13

He already is rich. His dad sits in the board, he got in with learning disabilities, and has a good laywer. Chances are pretty good they aren't exactly poor as is. Glad this kid is getting a shot at justice though.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 01:12 PM
1

Might want to edit to make clear when glass reporting happens, not the justice part
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/17 01:08 PM
1

The culture of westerns if if you have the physical power to do it, do it. Pretty sure the people upset with stuff that happens in the show aren't upset because it breaks the local laws of westeros.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:48 PM
1

I mean, unless those people talking love in westeros, I think it's probabaly fine to ignore westeros laws on the topic
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:13 PM
8

Well, legally, no county in the western world agrees with them, so I'm pretty sure it's safe to write them off as either wrong or non-western.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:40 PM
1

Looks like it would make me loose my shot. I seriously can't stand my legs being unable to move
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/17 03:03 PM
1

OP used 14 as an example so I went with it, but they were middle schoolers. 12 or 13 would be possible as well.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 03:38 AM
1

As I said. Life ruining is very largely dependent on the local judicial system. Just because something is legally acceptable punishment doesn't make it justified IMO.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:59 AM
1

Eh, I think there needs to be some kind of state punishment IMO, but as I have said elsewhere, I'm just not a fan of how extreme the US judicial system can be.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:58 AM
2

My point is the legality of ruining someone's life is not the same as the morality of it. I used an extreme example in hopes of highlighting that point.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:56 AM
2

I did say how I feel about it: the same. What the law would do and what should morally be done are not always the same.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:55 AM
3

In North Korea all you have to do ruin your life is say something neutral about the leader. Legality is not the same as morality.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:59 AM
1

It just comes down to a matter of opinion on it. You are absolutely right that boys would be crucified if the genders were reversed, and within the law the girls should be put on the list. I simply don't think that is what justice entails. That said, I don't have the kindest views of the US legal system in general.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:29 AM
-1

I don't disagree with your sentiment, but that doesn't change the fact that getting on it is on the table for punishments for these girls nor the fact that it would easily ruin their lives.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:09 AM
1

Lol. Me either, so no worries. I may have been completely off base on my thought that you need support anyways
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:07 AM
1

I didn't think legal emancipation was a thing unless there was someone specifically to support you.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 11:55 PM
-4

I personally think that at 14 you should have to go pretty far above and beyond to have the entirety of your life ruined by something like that. My stance holds for is genders were flipped as well.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 11:55 PM
9

At 11?
/r/MensRights09/05/17 11:50 PM
-5

Why? The girls need to be severely punished and probably scared straight, but enteral ruining their lives for something incredibly stupid they did at 14? Genders switched or not, the perpetrators need to be taught a lesson, but being put on the sex offenders registry is far too harsh of one IMO.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 11:48 PM
5

Confirming alibis maybe?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/17 04:05 AM
2

The sub likes seeing retaliation where people don't hold back against women. So basically, yes, but only when they start it.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/17 11:48 PM
1

Made a good friend this way. Don't even remember what the fight was about tbh, just that we were both fucking tweaked about it, but first time we met we ended up beating the shit out of each other. We ended up seeing each other again a week later, made up, went and got some beers, and became good friends.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/17 11:46 PM
2

Jesus man. That second girl. He rocked her fuckin world with that slap.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/17 11:38 PM
-1

completely disregarding the topic of women being oppressed, it shouldnt be difficult to realize we dont need apartheid for oppression to exist. Just because there wernt laws dictating the Irish couldn't work places doesn't mean they weren't opressed at the turn of the century.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:38 AM
0

The blacks wernt oppressed in the 50s! The first woman millionaire was black all of the way back in the 1800s after all! One person being rich has nothing to do with how oppressed the rest of a group is.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 01:45 AM
20

Enforcing specific vernacular for a course of study has nothing to do with the first amendment. If you were reading an engineering lab report and came across "long bendy pipe thing", even if it told you exactly what it was talking about, you would still expect that to loose points. Now that doesn't change how stupid this is, but it isn't a freedom of speech issue.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 02:14 PM
6

This is the face of too many vaccines. It realy is a shame. If he wasnt vaccinated maybe polio would have taken him already. Bless his heart.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 08:30 PM
49

Sorry man. Not my fault this sub crossed over pretty damn hard with /r/Incels. That fact is, this woman never used the fact that she was a woman to try and get away with something (she was just stupid) so it doesn't belong in this sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 05:46 PM
113

Hugely. It use to be a specific kind of justice porn and now it's just "DAE hate women? Lol!"
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 03:54 PM
0

oh, there is some genuine engrained sexism against women in our society. This just goes to prove that (women arent tough enough for jail/too stupid to realize what they did). Luckily, in my experience, most feminists do realize its a two way street to achieving equality.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:38 PM
4

agreed. If a uni finds the require signage offensive, then they can buy their own unoffensive ones to loan out.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:29 PM
30

You sound like a right cunt. It's realy not a big deal to just sell all future signs as "people working" instead of "men working". Plus being inclusive doesn't realy cost much. Hell, I bet you could crowd source the cost to change the machinery over.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 02:47 PM
2

Idk man. Dave is kind of a cunt. He should probably apologize for existing.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 05:44 AM
-4

because part of this sub hates women as much as some feminazis hate men. Most people just choose to ignore them.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/16 08:47 PM
8

IMO, Sarah is leagues above amy. I honestly do find a solid amount of her stuff quite funny. My problem with her is that the stuff of hers I don't like, I find straight up difficult to sit through. Honestly, I have yet to see anything from amy at all that I find funny
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/16 02:59 PM
1

Lol. I got that one every time I went to Dr as a teenager. I have never had suicidal thoughts, and afaik, have never been depressed. I guess the extra angsty look I tried for worked though.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:21 PM
9

Oh come on. You have for sure met someone that was super creepy before. You have also met someone that seems easy to take advantage of. I dont know how pointing these out is bad (so long as you arent super projecting).
/r/MensRights08/09/16 10:08 PM
11

Tbf, I have only seen one person thrown out of a party physically and it's because they were doing the limp child shit. Even after fights people just get asked to leave.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 08:05 PM
3

50s is also colder in California because of the lack of humidity though. 50F in California and I am in a jacket that blocks the wind. 50F in Tennessee where it's humid, however, I'm in pants and a t shirt.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 04:57 PM
2

One is a legal term, and a crime she was not technically convicted of. If she wasn't convicted she could get you for libel or defamation of character if you used the term.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 06:43 AM
-3

I didn't say that it change that fact that I agree with what he said. As for why it pisses me off to such an extent is because discussion is one of the most important factors of progress. You won't ever convince someone that this is wrong by calling them an apologist. If you can calmly discuss what your grievances are and what you feel would be a better alternative, you may stand a chance though. This sub is suppose to be about promoting equal rights, not belittling people who hold singular diff…
/r/MensRights19/06/16 06:29 PM
-16

Dude. I 100% agree with everything you said, but calling someone an "apologist" in damn near any situation just shows your a cunt that doesn't value discussion on the topic. Honestly, you had my complete support until that dumb ass line.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 04:45 PM
0

Maybe because he litteraly forced himself upon someone that was unconscious and was given a sentence so low there is no reasonable precedent.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:20 AM
4

These are completely different crimes though. The forced rape of an unconscious victim with multiple witnesses is extremely cut and dry. Statutory rape with victims extremely close to the age of consent is tricky because coercion can be hard to prove either way. Now, she was in a position of authority and should spend some time in jail as her actions were explicitly against the law, but trying to pretend these cases are comparable in the slightest is just as crazy as saying that someone can revo…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:17 AM
1

They are completely different crimes though. The forced rape of an unconscious victim with multiple witnesses is extremely cut and dry. Statutory rape with victims extremely close to the age of consent is tricky because coercion can be hard to prove either way. Now, she was in a position of authority and should spend some time in jail as her actions were explicitly against the law, but trying to pretend these cases are comparable in the slightest is just as crazy as saying that someone can revok…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:10 AM
4

Depends on state and the crime.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:58 AM
2

Violent and child offenders If anyone.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:57 AM
5

It should be pointed out that if what one of the mothers claiming is true (that one of the boys was coerced because of her position), that absolutely would be rape. Them problem in a lot of cases like this is that the "victims" don't feel taken advantage of in any way. That said, I guess that is the issue with any statutory rape law, and I certainly wouldn't argue getting rid of them.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:56 AM
2

But, it does. Now he was still wrong, but he did use teh word in the correct (all be it unusual) sense.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/15 12:16 AM
5

What the fuck? whoever wrote that article (if you can even call it that) has very obviously never been in a place of authority (nor do they posses any form of understanding over current society). Lets say he did come out and tell everyone to go fuck themselves, what would have happened? They would now have "proof" that he was intent on oppressing women with his shirt choice. Now what happened when he cried and said that was never the intention? They have fucking nothing. It shows he is just a no…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 12:22 AM
1

the close door of a stall
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter