| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oppose the Violence Against Women Act - Julie BorowskiOh, believe me, I stand behind that. Again, I am libertarian by political philosophy, not party. I stand behind principles, and will see any move in the right direction as a good move, no matter from which party. I am, unfortunately, mired in pessimism, and see the greatest progress coming from the bottom, not the top, and I will hope you understand that, which is my point: I am not optimistic about compromise. It has not worked well in the past. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/13 05:18 PM |
| 1 | Oppose the Violence Against Women Act - Julie BorowskiI suppose I would recommend the same for you. It is quite optimistic to assume that any party willing to compromise will ever be honest. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/13 05:08 PM |
| 1 | Oppose the Violence Against Women Act - Julie BorowskiAgain: which would you suggest? Democratic party? Republican party? Come to me when you have an option which isn't inherently corrupted already. You are already aware, I would hope, that none of the political options we have now are even sort of in support of men's rights, and none of them seem too concerned with shortening or lessening war. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/13 04:54 PM |
| 1 | Oppose the Violence Against Women Act - Julie BorowskiIt's up to Libertarians to gain credibility if they want to be seen as independent from mainstream conservative politics. Perhaps refusing to write for conservative media outlets or run for office on conservative political platforms would be a good start. This already occurs, you are just not very keen to it apparently, or you are deciding that because some libertarians go on conservative outlets, all of them do. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/13 04:46 PM |
| 1 | Oppose the Violence Against Women Act - Julie BorowskiLike the democratic or republican party? Or would you suggest a "men's rights" party? Regardless, I am not a libertarian of a political group, I am a libertarian by political philosophy. If I vote, it will be for a libertarian, or the most anti-war person on the ballot. However, I am a rothbard libertarian, do not see government as a decent solution to anything, and am instead focusing my efforts into agorism. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/13 04:42 PM |
| 1 | Oppose the Violence Against Women Act - Julie BorowskiYou are talking to a gay, male, pacifist libertarian, and you are suggesting something you clearly know nothing about. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/13 04:35 PM |
| 1 | Oppose the Violence Against Women Act - Julie BorowskiThere is a libertarian party and, usually, when there is a libertarian option libertarians vote the libertarian option, not the conservative option. I forgot, though: are we not talking about libertarian Julie Borowski, who voted Libertarian Gary Johnson? Aren't we talking about libertarians, when you criticized conservatives? Are we not talking about "gynocentric" points of view, which libertarians do not hold? | /r/MensRights | 13/02/13 04:25 PM |
| 1 | Oppose the Violence Against Women Act - Julie BorowskiYou are ignoring the difference between "not a liberal" and conservative, the difference between personal and political conservatism, and the difference between writing for a conservative website and calling yourself a conservative (which she explicitly says that's not how she categorizes herself). Of course it seems I'm splitting hairs. But a better point, admittedly, is that whether you call yourself a conservative or not is irrelevant to whether you adhere to the same conservative which you c… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/13 01:29 PM |
| 1 | Oppose the Violence Against Women Act - Julie BorowskiIt's important to, I suppose, point out that this is not the same as calling herself conservative. She writes articles for a website which accepts her opinions. The only way she has personally called herself conservative was in her private life, but you were talking about politics. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 06:26 AM |
| 1 | Oppose the Violence Against Women Act - Julie BorowskiI dunno. Certainly confused with conservative and libertarian, but I've taken right-wing to mean "accepting of hierarchy," which is definitely a possible result of libertarian thought, since libertarians are of the "equality of rights, not of ends" mind. Conservative, on the other hand, means precisely what it sounds like. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/13 02:44 PM |
| 1 | Oppose the Violence Against Women Act - Julie BorowskiJulie Borowski is a Libertarian, and while you might say that this is a right-wing ideology, it isn't a conservative ideology in the least. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/13 01:49 PM |
| 1 | I picked out this gem from all the petty, childish bullying going on in the #ineedmasculismbecause tag. Can anyone say "Irony" for me?There was a pretty fucking ridiculous one which went like "because the b!tch I raped wants child support." (censorship retained) | /r/MensRights | 10/02/13 12:05 PM |
| 1 | Warren Farrell quotes: What is their context?that was actually a pretty great point. Someone should try asking a feminist if a girl can say "no" while raping a man and get the man charged with rape. "Verbal consent" being the only criterion, or the most important one, really breaks down quickly. Especially when you consider that a lot these people define rape by lack of verbal consent, and then simultaneously argue that "rape does not exist in the animal kingdom." | /r/MensRights | 10/02/13 11:38 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter