TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

esuil Archive

View 1 posts and 207 comments by esuil on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
140

Generalesuil/r/MensRights07/10/24 08:19 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Then it makes absolutely no sense to be hostile instead of re-iterating that. I don't see how ANYONE benefits from what happened in this conversation. Why would the immediate answer to my comment be "you don't have anything to contribute"? I work in IT. I could had contributed technologically. I am male who is being silenced. I am part of the core audience. I am independent politically. I could had contributed financially. I am sometimes active in communities around MRA. I could had contributed …
/r/MensRights26/07/26 07:14 PM
2

Perhaps I am. But being pedantic or skeptical isn't really a crime or such a morally terrible thing though. It also doesn't directly harm the cause. In your opinion, who might turn away people from contributing to the cause more - someone who is being pedantic, or someone who immediately jumps to alienate and attack someone for mild criticism? Isn't there a contradiction between fighting against those who silence others, while being so trigger happy to attack someone just for criticism or "being…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 04:25 PM
2

I have seen your type over and over, and I am bored of men like you. Even if we had a build to launch right now, you would just find another excuse to attack the post, ergo you are anti-social. Goodbye. Open source the project this week, and I will dedicate a year of my time helping you to develop it, with at least 5 hours a week dedicated to it. This will allow us to see who is here to look for excuses.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 04:19 PM
3

You have not addressed my point and instead are attempting to misdirect conversation into fallacy and personal attack. I doubt you can actually give an example of me "attacking posts where MRA are doing something proactive". Because you didn't base your claim about me on our past interactions - you based in on your perceived impression that you created in your own mind, without examining or considering the situation. I am here anonymously, so asking "what have you done for the MRM" is clear cut …
/r/MensRights26/07/26 04:14 PM
2

1) I have not attacked anyone. You perceived it as an attack because you are clearly projecting. 2) There are no good news yet. The only thing of substance in this post is discord link - which is not a safe space or good news. 3) Your immediate first reaction was to perform personal attack on me for mild criticism and made baseless claims about me. This is not a behavior of someone seeking to build unbiased safe space for voices to be heard - because your personal immediate urge is to attempt to…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 04:02 PM
1

Wow. And here I was giving you a benefit of the doubt in my mind... Thanks for letting me know how much of a good faith project this is.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 03:56 PM
5

Maybe reserve announcements for... When you actually have something? Having "coming soon" announcement with discord attached just reads as "we don't actually have anything, but you can... use something that isn't an actual safe-space to communicate with us!".
/r/MensRights26/07/26 03:42 PM
2

Have you ACTUALLY tried talking to the AI about things like that, or did you make this conclusion because people told you this is how AI is?
/r/Divorce_Men12/07/26 03:21 PM
4

What about you/kids citizenship and home? You say "back at home" and such multiple times, but it is unclear where the home is. It is completely different situation if home is in France or in the US, for example.
/r/Divorce_Men11/07/26 09:32 AM
29

Ironically, that's how it used to be across almost all cultures.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 07:52 PM
2

That's completely fucked up, but I'm shocked its not getting more attention in the West given that it given it makes Russia look horrible. Many mainstream media in the west are instructed not to go too deep on this topic because it can't be used one-sidedly. In other words, if they start talking about it, they open up a can of worms of similar things happening in Ukraine itself.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 05:17 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights19/06/26 02:46 PM
7

Does this forum have lighter theme for people who don't live in their basements with 0 light? That dark theme is almost unredable for me.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 07:01 AM
29

Ukrainian women can literally pack up and be out of the country and in EU in a day. No permission required from anyone, no fees or regulations, no bureaucracy anywhere, just take your passport and get out. Meanwhile most men can't even walk their own neighborhood without having military documents on them and being harassed to show them. Not to mention being forbidden from leaving the country. And pretty much all of it is illegal and unconstitutional - it is clearly written into constitution that…
/r/MensRights22/05/26 05:08 AM
-1

Welcome to the real world, in which everyone dies and gets forgotten in the end, and there is nothing you can do about it.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 11:14 PM
3

You are missing the point. The only reason you picked specifically semitism as your example is recent rise of anti-semitism, and by doing so you are indirectly contributing to it by spreading the sentiments around it. Your message is structured and framed in such a way, that it makes it seem like anti-Israel rhetoric is most of the time valid, and is being called anti-semitic to shut down valid criticisms, while in reality, only minor part of such rhetoric is valid, and minority cases you are re…
/r/MensRights30/04/26 08:15 PM
3

I agree with Shutup here. Your example is bad, because in reality, unlike with incel usage, anti-semitism claims are often very valid and aren't used with "VALID criticism", as you put it. Especially because term "valid criticism" is often used by the very real anti-semites to deflect from the fact that they are pushing propaganda.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 07:41 PM
3

To change the topic a bit, do you think the war is hopeless? I am of an opinion that we should had accepted concessions earlier in the war (2022-2023) and gave up some land to Russia while on height of morale and EU support. Current goals are unclear and I have a feeling Zelensky government will sabotage any efforts to get a deal. Putin hates Zelensky government, so he is unlikely to settle on anything with him. Zelensky is pushing the stance that is unrealistic and is not obtainable in any kind…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 05:47 PM
10

The answer is because many of them are "stuck" with women they have to agree with, or demolish their lives to walk away. So they gaslight themselves into conflicting views to keep their peace and be able to live the life they have. It isn't because they are stupid, toxic, have weird desire to submit or anything like that. They just got into the situations they are in, and then mentally adapted. Simply put, they are too far in and can't walk away anymore. This is why it is important to only get i…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 04:27 PM
3

people should especially men should be afraid to visit Ukraine If you are visitor, that fear is stupid and just Russian propaganda. If you are foreigner, they will leave you alone the moment you start speaking in English/show your passport. And if you are Ukrainian, they will ask for your documents first. It is common, but also not, because it is very regional. As in, those are mobile teams that are constantly on the move to change their operating zone. If they camped in some residential distric…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 05:04 AM
1

Something like that probably did happen but it's obviously highly censored to not motivate anyone. It does happen, but it gets immediately scrubbed of the internet or happens where no one can see/record it (because obviously anyone at that point of their life doesn't want to store and broadcast what they did on the internet).
/r/MensRights25/04/26 08:52 AM
37

Ukrainian here. Here is the thing. The whole thing is utter failure. It doesn't work. Those people being dragged don't actually fight on the frontlines. Most of them just join the ranks of hundreds of thousands of deserters/dodgers. There is severe disconnect and conflict between recruitment teams that do this and actual military. This severely impacted public image, morale, and effectiveness. It was utter failure. It is soviet style disorganization of "well, they said they need 100 people so I …
/r/MensRights25/04/26 08:45 AM
15

Every male (either at birth or as a child/teen/adult) needs to submit a DNA sample, which is then kept in a registry. When a sexual assault takes place, any DNA evidence left behind can be directly tracked and identified, and charges be laid. Watch them to do complete 180 on this when you say "sounds great! And mandatory paternity test during birth!".
/r/MensRights19/04/26 06:02 AM
1

Well, duh, and yet government isn't extraditing anyone or issuing warrants. It is very bad look and they are doing their best to pretend this isn't the case, so they don't talk about it internationally.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 02:58 PM
-2

I have no clue what you are talking about. 1) Germans are in EU, so they already have automatic residency in any EU country 2) German passport is very strong. 3) Germany is rich country. Lower income German becomes middle class in poor country automatically even with small amount of savings.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 10:30 AM
6

Almost no one actually extradites people for minor civil offenses like that. That kind of thing is only reserved for serious criminal offenses. Most extraditions require two things: 1) Arrest warrant 2) Very significant crime committed - murder, sexual violence, human trafficking, large financial crime (talking scale of tens of millions), drug production/smuggling and so on. No one is going to start issuing arrest warrants and extradition requests for German citizens because they didn't do some …
/r/MensRights03/04/26 09:35 PM
30

Well, and if someone doesn't want to do that, they can just leave without doing that, duh, that's the point. It is not "have to", it is "they want you to", which is bit different. Since you can just leave without doing it, it means that wording of "have to" does not really apply. Perhaps "supposed to" would be better wording.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 07:45 PM
117

Realistically speaking, due to Germany being in EU, this is impossible to actually enforce. Any men who don't agree with this can simply cross the border freely and fuck off in whatever direction/country they want. So at least they are not as locked in as Ukrainians, for now.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 07:10 PM
4

The first step for fair treatment is acceptance that you want to judge people unfairly. If you deny your own nature of being unfair, which is human nature and how brain works, you can not possibly start to treat someone fairly. So you are right, they are full of shit.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 12:55 AM
7

Hilariously, deviation that are "in your head" normally are treated like mental disorders/disabilities, not "being healthy but different". But this is magically different.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 08:50 PM
12

Laws act on legal status, but people enforcing the law will act on appearance. Until you make a scene, take them to court, and so on. But none of that, after the fact, will solve the initial fact of you being treated as a man before you went to court.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 08:47 PM
7

"I don't understand my kid anymore" is easier thing to accept than "My kid is actually a bad person, damn..."
/r/Divorce_Men12/01/26 07:49 PM
3

See, I don't understand what you mean here. You say " trap that you deserve something because you’re a man", but after reading over the messages, I fail to find anything that suggests such mentality. If anything OC point is exactly the opposite - that you should not buy into idea that being a man and doing specific things means you will get/deserve something in return.
/r/Divorce_Men29/12/25 09:13 PM
1

IMO, if you are not prepared to debate him, you should not call him "failure", "incel mentality", "entitled prick" etc. Those are all quotes from your messages. Because if you are "not here to debate", with wording like that, it comes off as you just came to insult him.
/r/Divorce_Men29/12/25 08:52 PM
5

Reading stories on this sub is really sobering sometimes. I can't even imagine how shit the life must be when your sleep is interrupted each day by someone waking you up for no reason. Actually, now that I write this, I actually can imagine it from back when I still was with my parent. Absolutely horrible. Your life is going to improve dramatically.
/r/Divorce_Men25/12/25 05:30 AM
1

I get what you are saying. Hopefully you will figure it out, wishing you the best in it.
/r/Divorce_Men19/12/25 09:10 PM
6

My place will never be as cool as home I wanted to interject on that part. Kids don't judge places by adult standards. They can find absolute dumps the most fun places to be at - depending on people and activities they are doing there. Don't let your own perspective cloud the way you can shape your experience with your son.
/r/Divorce_Men19/12/25 08:51 PM
2

No, you aren't the only one. Posts like this or stories from other people "normal lives" that give such importance to things like this always baffle me. It's like I just live normal life while they are living in some kind of TV comedy or something. I don't really get it. On top of it, never had any female in my life even mention anything about toiled lids, like ever. Like, no one cares. So yeah, I am with you on this.
/r/Divorce_Men17/12/25 12:51 PM
2

The problem with this approach is that almost any woman that makes you happy will just eventually shrug and leave to find someone who will actually live together with her.
/r/Divorce_Men13/12/25 05:26 PM
4

Avoid women, do what ever makes you happy This seem like it will cause natural question: "But dad, what do I do if woman makes me happy?"
/r/Divorce_Men13/12/25 11:37 AM
19

Not OP, but I was interested as well and found it. https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf
/r/MensRights30/11/25 01:54 AM
7

The only people using Linkedin are people who are leeches that can spend their time circlejerking in professional nepo circles instead of working. Normal people just fill their profile and leave. Or use it when they look for a job. That whole site is just HR and management infestation and those people have no respect, empathy or honor. Any time I used LI those people could not even bother reading/comprehending my profile or messages. They just plow forward on their assumptions. They only see wha…
/r/MensRights29/11/25 05:58 PM
31

Isn't the old left exactly who destroyed male spaces in the first place?
/r/MensRights25/11/25 09:20 PM
6

Kids born rich have families with tradition and history of being rich that knows how to raise them. Yeah, there are some that aren't like that, but most upper class families stay upper class for generations by being smart about how transfer of wealth to next one comes about.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 01:53 PM
4

I know you said you don't care, but you should start doing stuff like that AFTER you are on top, not before. Because doing it can actively prevent you from financially recovering. I can understand bacon, but TV on credit while in debt already is likely not in your best interest.
/r/Divorce_Men25/09/25 08:54 AM
24

Logically speaking, it can not possibly be true, which should be obvious to anyone. Because if it was true, no society on the planet would give women equal rights or protections and they would be treated as property even in modern day.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 02:24 PM
12

Mother would be the last person I would trust to get facts about situation in cases like this.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 08:54 AM
20

This kind of mentality is how they slowly gained this unchecked narciscistic behavior and general culture of it being acceptable became the norm. No, it is not meaningless, and acting like it was is how things deteriorated to shit they are now.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 11:51 AM
18

Even that is not even remotely true... Even before modern times, local communities would go on rampage and lynch men that would get accused of rape by a local woman, even with 0 evidence. History is full of such cases.
/r/MensRights20/09/25 09:03 PM
5

Actually, logically speaking it might be more fair if they are paid less. In pretty much most workspaces I know about, married workers are given more benefits compared to single people. Emergencies, late to work, coming early, not being able to cover for someone else, etc - all is excused for married people, all is pushed onto single people instead. So I bet if we examine productivity fairly, we might find that unmarried do more work and claim less benefits, so their value is higher.
/r/MensRights19/09/25 12:37 PM
2

The lawyers talk and the agreement worked out. It’s easy. Also known as "divorce shenanigans", so I am not sure why you are saying it is nonsense. It is not nonsense, it is indeed needless shenanigans. If your standard operating procedure is to engage in shenanigans for the sake of negotiating and coming to agreement afterwards, that does not make all those actions "not shenanigans". If I make shitting on the neighbor steps part of my morning routine, I can't just say "I am not shitting, I am ju…
/r/Divorce_Men16/09/25 12:07 AM
12

That's outrageous and annoying, but not the same as sub being banned...
/r/MensRights25/08/25 03:19 PM
2

Perhaps I should not had separated context video from my initial comment. I separated them in case linking will get flagged for something and comment removed. It is 2025 and there is a chance that people are not being bad faith but simply impulsive and just vote without even reading anything. Though this is not the first time this kind of thing happens to me in this subreddit, so I am leaning more and more that many people don't actually care about rights or struggles, are are simply pursing age…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:45 PM
3

so essentially all citizens eligible for it, are under ostyh You aren't under oath unless you gave that oath... Um, yes they are? You think this is all their doing? Some of them are. Most of them don't. There are about 100-150k of retired police and military of age eligible for the draft in Ukraine currently. They are not being touched at all, while civilians get forced to join the army, Also, why is this always the argument about wars "Oh [Specific necessary proffesion] aren't doing much fighti…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:33 PM
4

Fighting to defend your country from being invaded an aggressive neighbouring nation is treason? Draft officers and police are not fighting to defend the country. They are sworn career military/police who are afraid to die doing their job, so they prefer to catch and force civilians who never gave the oath to go do it instead of them.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:03 PM
-1

It is systematic This is what I said in my comment: "result of awful actions during mobilization", "no consequences for all the trash done by mobilization officers", "motions he is used to". I think this aligns with "its systematic". Where are you pulling your "one office" from, exactly? I am bit confused on which part of my comment you are trying to refute, so if you could quote it, it would help.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:55 AM
-9

It is. The video is real, the issues are real as well. But instead of using the truth they can't help but modify the events a little to fit their agenda... In this case, this was basically drunk guy forgetting he is drunk and trying to do his work as he sees it.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:46 AM
-25

Not what is happening at all. See my comment. Men are indeed being abducted by the state constantly. But this video is not one of such videos. See my comment in this thread for actual context.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:44 AM
14

Here is video with more context after the window was smashed: https://reddit.com/r/reddit_ukraina/comments/1murnef/ The guy is being arrested while people around are demanding responsibility and complain that if he is taken away (guy who smashed the window) they won't get justice, so he should take alcohol test while still in public and filmed. As said, this is huge issue and unlawfuness and abuse in Ukraine are outrageous... Which is why you DON'T need to make up lies about the events to fit yo…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:38 AM
-16

Just to be clear - this is awful incident born as a result of awful actions during mobilization and no consequences for all the trash done by mobilization officers and staff. With that out of the way, I have to say that the title is misrepresenting the situation. The husband in the video is not "tracked down and forcibly mobilized". What actually is happening is that mobilization worker is drunk to shreds and is likely going trough the motions he is used to while his mental state is in complete …
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:37 AM
4

If you get a divorce, proving mental instability will help you not get completely fucked by a court Would not it be exactly the opposite? If she is proven mentally unstable on top of things, would not court mandate him provide her even more assets or support after the divorce?
/r/Divorce_Men10/08/25 01:05 PM
5

What’s your opinion on this? Do things get easier, do they eventually give up on the campaign of hate? I am not old enough to personally experience it, but I have seen it happen in the family. And what happened was that ex-wife post divorce used the fact that it did not go the way she wanted as source of resentment that NEVER got away. So if you don't roll over and let her have everything she wants, consider possibility that she will behave like a stubborn child that did not get what they demand…
/r/Divorce_Men01/08/25 10:18 AM
5

Yeah, and this whole "Not for profit!" is absolute bullshit. You are paying yourself and your people salary. You are spending money on services of other people unrelated to charity (marketing, consultations, and so on). Those are money that go out of charity bank account and into personal accounts of people who got paid. By definition, that money is profit for those people. The only difference between non-profits and for-profit businesses is that latter withdraws their profits directly from acco…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 11:18 PM
1

Considering the nature of the post, perhaps you should drink some water instead. :D
/r/Divorce_Men10/07/25 10:11 PM
1

Then you will have recording of her taking it down.
/r/Divorce_Men08/07/25 06:21 AM
2

No curiosity people who are not interested in what you have to say I asked you to clarify your position in more detail and your reply was literally "no." giving me directives to define things in a narrow way We have narrow conversation about specific thing. Of course the topic of the discussion will be narrow. We aren't going to start talking about weather when discussing the marriage. Your open minded dialogue talked about anything but actual topic - marriage, and what parts of it are exclusive…
/r/Divorce_Men05/07/25 08:30 PM
0

It does. It clearly establishes that you indeed use same fallacy as usual - because you are not able to define any aspects that are not available outside of the marriage and just as usual simply attribute things that are not marriage exclusive to marriage.
/r/Divorce_Men05/07/25 07:34 PM
1

Okay. Now define your conjugal marriage and then filter out things that are exclusive to specifically institutional marriage and are not available otherwise.
/r/Divorce_Men05/07/25 06:51 PM
1

Like most arguments in favor of marriage, you are using a fallacy by attributing something not marriage specific to the marriage. If two unmarried people lived together happily while raising their kids, would this environment significantly differ from same situation, but with legal marriage? When you were a kid, how many times did you see marriage license of your parents? How many situations you were in where you had to provide legal proof your parents are married? If your parents were not marri…
/r/Divorce_Men05/07/25 03:15 PM
1

Most of those are public stunt clickbaits from specific politicians. Just look into the details. None of those actually are ready or want to do anything like that. This is why you see so many "minister", "politician", "ex-whatever" in the headlines like those. They are not going to do anything like that. Just like they are not going to do anything that will result in this war ending in something that is good for Ukraine. Extreme measures like deporting Ukrainian men would go against the unspoken…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 05:31 PM
10

I send her a pic of my son eating his milkshake. Why in the world would you send her photos? You should know better.
/r/Divorce_Men16/06/25 05:54 AM
5

You can see Tiktok UI on your screenshots. If this is from instagram, it is clearly TikTok video reposted to Instagram.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 04:53 PM
13

Are you out of your mind? She was 8. The real criminal here is clearly the mother.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 04:25 AM
2

What are those 7 countries?
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:48 PM
5

Yeah. If my father tried getting a hold of me at that age, I would probably find excuses to ignore him, be unreachable, or just give token responses. Quite different once I became older though. Now I would be ok to hangout even if it's awkward.
/r/Divorce_Men02/06/25 04:33 AM
10

Where? Whos father? Sounds like absolute nonsense...
/r/MensRights27/05/25 05:28 PM
–

Oh, she probably did care. Just not in the way OP wants her to care. Things like this are almost always intentional. She wanted to get to him. You need to learn to see it for what it is and stop acting like miserable wet rag for her to wipe her feet when she does it. Because that's exactly what she wants.
/r/Divorce_Men27/05/25 10:38 AM
10

This is why robotic AI companions will change the game completely. The moment first realistic AI wifes will start appearing on the market, women will start rioting because their power will start slipping away.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 08:16 PM
3

Yeah, this is very concerning situation. He needed to run like months ago.
/r/Divorce_Men19/05/25 06:56 AM
2

Yeah, this is insane level of being shaken down, my god, this poor man.
/r/Divorce_Men16/05/25 09:24 AM
2

Was the outcome good for you afterwards?
/r/Divorce_Men16/05/25 06:41 AM
6

Awards aren't just for your gender... It's for achieving something. There are many gender neutral or women based achievement awards, but pretty much none left for men. You would not be receiving the award for "what's between your legs", you would be receiving it for something you achieved.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 08:25 PM
10

When they use this argument, suggest introduction of alternative, but equivalent services imposed on women that will align with their argument. Then watch how they will instantly deflate in their arguments. For example, when they suggest repopulation after war with men being drafted, support this view by proposing repopulation draft programs that will forcefully mandate that women during draft periods are drafted to serve as baby incubators as opposed to military. After all, you need to rebuild …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/25 10:14 AM
13

You forgot to call it rape. No he didn't. It's literally in the title. And the first sentence. What is this pointless pedantism?
/r/MensRights04/05/25 01:59 PM
22

They are virtue signaling on the internet, not choosing the bear. Place them in real situation and they will all choose the man - surely we both understand that, right? That's why they use internet and live among civilization and humans, instead of running away into the woods to live alone. Argument that those women from big cities interacting with and walking among unknown men on daily basis are actually choosing the bear is absolutely laughable. If anything, the whole "man or the bear" perfect…
/r/MensRights01/05/25 09:40 AM
22

When I was around 20, I hung out with friends who brought some other friends, one of whom was a girl I never seen before. She came onto me at some point and went to unbutton upper buttons on my shirt "because you look better like that" or some shit. I took her hands in mine to stop her purely out of instinct - like some stranger just came to me and started adjusting my clothes, wtf? Not even forceful, I just blocked her hands, stopping her, and gave her the look like "WTF are you doing?", thinki…
/r/MensRights23/04/25 11:28 AM
3

It will instead be sexless and androgynous It will be that because humans as species will transition into artificial bodies and constructs, inevitably, the way it is going. Biologically restrictive future does not exist, as long as humans keep existing. We will either transition and merge with electronic forms of bodies, or find ways to manipulate and modify things on biological level. The things you are talking about are only relevent for short term future, and that short term future is basical…
/r/MensRights18/04/25 02:11 PM
11

Military members are absolutely financially stable. In fact, due to benefits, cost of living coverage and so on, military career is probably better financial security than lot of average Americans. You can save shitload of money in the military, because you don't bleed any money just to be housed, fed and supplied with basics like power/heating and so on. The only reason many guys come out worse out of military is because they get taken advantage of or make poor financial decisions. Military is …
/r/MensRights06/04/25 01:21 AM
8

This is why you have to buy "backup plan" land that is suitable enough to become self sustaining now, while land is still cheap and plentiful. Does not matter if you are not even going to use it now. Having it in case shit does hit the fan will provide you with solid foundation to fall back into. Robotics and AI will change the paradigm completely. But anyone who does not have access to resources will not be able to tap into any of it. Farmland or pastures will be one of such resources. Having l…
/r/MensRights28/03/25 08:35 AM
19

You must be insane. There are cases in Russia of women in the system marrying new conscripts, then having their henchmen close to frontlines kill them at the front, collecting money and marrying again to repeat the cycle. It is so bad it is basically a business model for some. Major part of female population in Russia treats their men as disposable if there is an opportunity to cash it out - and all of that is perfectly supported by the state. Men in Russia have mandatory service. Women don't. I…
/r/MensRights28/03/25 08:30 AM
9

His motivation was hardly about men rights. As we know now, he was simply attempting to remove anything that could make Russia's takeover harder. It was hardly "unrelated", considering it was all part of his task to break Ukraine apart from Europe and closer to Russia.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 01:46 PM
13

The problem here is, it is impossible for people who got forced into this to accurately report any complications. Because they have no perspective of how it is normally, they will accept their situation as normal from the start, thus not consider it to be a complication.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:54 AM
1

In USA draft dodgers were alienated heavily during the war... But once WW2 ended, they were all magically pardoned by presidential decree.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 04:57 AM
1

It probably was. But there were no cameras or media back then to document it. "Selective Training and Service Act" in US was pretty much similar thing. People who think this is just Ukraine thing are delusional. This is how it always was all over the world whenever those in power needed men for war. The only reason Americans think otherwise is because they are deluded into thinking that wars they waged with small, insignificant countries are in any way similar to what actual peer war would look …
/r/MensRights02/03/25 04:44 AM
2

This video looks like its in Poland. The car at the end has what looks to be polish plates. Surprise - countries that border each other and have common history (this region was part of Poland at some points, Ukraine others, and so on) often look similar or the same. This is like saying that place in North England looks like Scottland, so it is probably not England. Completely illogical. Just because there is a line on the map somewhere, does not mean cities and people suddenly flip to be complet…
/r/MensRights02/03/25 04:27 AM
3

That no one is talking about it. The link proves it not true.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 03:23 PM
-2

1) It is not a dictatorship 2) Debunking false claims about bad government does not mean someone is "defending" it 3) Spreading Russian propaganda instead of realistic take on a situation with understanding of what is truth, and what is lie, does not help people whos rights actually are being violated If you care about rights of men, you will care about facts and which rights are being violated in reality, not imaginary land and made up problems. If you make up imaginary problems and fight again…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 11:13 PM
4

I agree with you here. But at the same time, the claims of the guy I was answering at are literal nonsense that does not require deep understanding of politics or situation. He is literally claiming that men in Ukraine who go against the draft or system have their family members or CHILDREN kidnapped and held hostage (or whatever else) by the state. Living in the country and seeing how things actually happen in such scenarios is enough to understand how nonsense this claim is. Hell, even someone…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 11:09 PM
-4

but I still don't really see how this could compare Okay. Couple of comparisons. 1) Situation in Ukraine is temporary and new. Before 2022 this was not happening. It will also go away with war, most likely. Situation in Muslim countries is not new. It was going on for generations and had no relation to temporary crisis or the like. Which type of personal rights crisis would you consider to be worse - temporary breakdown due to emergency in the country, or permanent way of living that enshrines i…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 08:19 PM
9

I am a Ukrainian. From Kharkiv. I don't "think". I know how things are here for a fact. It is not a dictatorship/totalitarian. Families don't get kidnapped. Cases like this video also are not as common as media leads you to believe. Yes, it is an issue. And I am against such practices and consider them to be violation of our constitution. But BS you are talking about has nothing to do with realities that are happening here in Ukraine - and more with propaganda pushed out by the Russian media ins…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:29 PM
9

No they would not? What the hell you are on about? Yes, there are violations of rights for men in Ukraine. No, it is not literal nazi state with family being responsible for each other and BS like that.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:07 PM
-22

I mean, that routinely happens in Muslim countries. In fact, it can be argued that things that happen to women in Muslim world are way, way worse than what is happening to men in Ukraine. But same feminists who ignore mens rights will ignore what is happening in Muslim countries, or even protect them (the countries and their views).
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:06 PM
1

Sorry, but what does Iceland have to do with it? All of it happened in Ireland, where does Iceland come in here?
/r/MensRights13/09/24 11:42 AM
2

That's fine.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 06:42 PM
3

Do you have references to cases of this happening?
/r/MensRights08/09/24 05:48 PM
9

That... That can't be true, under EU laws, can it?
/r/MensRights08/09/24 05:41 PM
1

falsely accused of rape by a white woman My man. White woman in this case could not even attempt to accuse anyone. She was dead. DEAD. Do you not understand what being dead means? Where, exactly, did you find woman who said anything in this story?
/r/MensRights08/09/24 04:10 AM
0

because of a false allegation of sexual assault By whom, Karl? Because your title says "KKK believed women". So I will ask you again - which women was believed in this story?
/r/MensRights08/09/24 04:05 AM
4

And this kind of thing is posted here with "false accusation" tag. The irony. I am convinced some people have agenda to discredit anything mens rights related by pushing bullshit like this. Mods and community should be on top of crap like this ASAP, but here we are...
/r/MensRights07/09/24 07:16 AM
3

So I am reading this article and I do not see any "believed women" moments in there. The victim was dead from start to finish, and mob was composed of men. But with title like yours, you are clearly talking about women accusations and them being believed resulting in this. Can you elaborate which part of this story you are referring at? In fact, I was only able to find opposite of your claim in that article - the part of the story about Jessie Daniel, who is basically the opposite to your claim.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 04:51 AM
21

When I was in Uni, there was a cute girl in class full of IT nerds. Her grades and performance was rated higher than 90% people there. Was she actually more competent than 90% of guys there? Nope. It just that whenever she had difficulty with anything, she would sit down next to one of the smart "suckers for the day", act all pretty and innocent and ask for help with it. She never actually did become more competent than most people there. But she did go trough it all successfully because, while …
/r/MensRights29/08/24 03:57 AM
2

People can commit to wrong ideas due to sunk cost fallacy even if no one is watching, because they conditioned themselves into it. There is a reason why people who seemingly should understand the issue keep living as if they don't when they can't actually fix that issue - because recognizing that issue while not fixing it would just mean living in miseral wisdom instead of blissful ignorance. If someone is stuck in marriage ridden with problems, but they can't leave it without committing self-su…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:35 AM
3

Or they can, but they are in "sunk cost fallacy" due to marriage and kids.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:53 AM
-1

It does not exist everywhere, and it sure as hell safer compared to legal marriage. They would have to prove the common law marriage as well, which can be way harder to do. And bypassing it is as simple as living somewhere where it does not exist or establishing the paper trail of it not being a marriage type relationship.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 04:21 AM
1

Why not? I mean, you can still live together without marriage.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 01:56 AM
82

Yeah, you even changed it up a bit in your example. Now imagine the wording of "Teaching girls to treat men properly.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 08:54 AM
-7

See, and people like you who use it to further Russian agenda and propaganda contribute to this shit. It is because of people like you that it became impossible to fix it internally in Ukraine - because anyone who tries instantly gets swarmed by Russian useful idiots like you and becomes agent of influence furthering Russian agenda instead of working on internal Ukrainian issues. Good job, troll.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 01:05 AM
-1

Eh. Not sure I agree. You notice how those guys wear face masks and operate in large groups against single guy? It is because they know. And they are scared. They don't feel certain or secure.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:48 AM
3

Why would anyone agree with this kind of thinking? Burning country/civilization to the ground includes burning those very people who are treated like that - so that kind of sentiment makes you even worse than people who oppress them.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:11 AM
55

What actually happens is they basically fill in their quota and send those people into training compounds. They don't care what happens afterwards - because "they did their part of the job" by finding "healthy man eligible for draft". Then many of those men simply leave the training compounds or run away. According to some sources I know, there are currently ~200k of men like this who are considered as AWOL from training grounds. Don't know how real this is, considering this is not made public, …
/r/MensRights11/07/24 10:26 PM
3

Yep, it sure is deleted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 09:48 AM
16

They pick the one more fitting to their needs, discarding the others. Haha. Bold of you to assume they actually "discard" anyone instead of gaslighting everyone to keep their options going in perpetuity.
/r/MensRights27/06/24 12:36 AM
13

Eh, their example appears to show sex discrimination actually. The only way to vote as a man in their example is military service. If you are woman, you can vote by default. That sounds like textbook discrimination to me.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 04:13 PM
31

I look at it this way, it is filter that makes stupid people self-report themselves. We already know that majority of population are morons. This is simply one of the ways those can tell you which part of the population they are.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 01:47 PM
1

Hm, new drugs?
/r/MensRights10/06/24 12:10 AM
-11

The fact that it was possible to convict and imprison someone for a crime this serious they did not commit, with a total lack of evidence going only on witness statements, should be horrifying to any reasonable person. Yes. Which is why, IMO, title could had reflected the nature of what happened better. Current title and flair make it seem like another case of woman lying about rape happening.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:00 PM
-34

Well duh, human testimonies are not reliable, that is known fact. Which is why court sentences are supposed to be based on wider evidence, not single testimony. The thing that failed here is evidence part of the system, because he was convicted with literally nothing but unreliable testimony of the victim. There is difference between people who intentionally make false accusations of rape, and traumatized victims who do it after being convinced it is the right person.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 11:59 AM
-60

If he looked similar, she might as well was thinking she is right. She was raped by a stranger, so she did not know and was not familiar with how the rapist looked. Sure, it can technically count as false accusation because the person being accused is the wrong one. But the title and the flair are written in a way that makes reader think the rape itself did not happen. I think "for the rape committed by someone else" would be better, more informative title.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 11:47 AM
-69

I am not sure this counts as false accusation, rape did happen. This is the case of wrong person being convicted and failure of the police and courts, not a case of false accusations.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 11:38 AM
9

Very ironic how AE Ops removes posts like that, but Chinese/Russian/Identity politics/etc paid propaganda is allowed to freely flow all across the reddit. It shows that THERE IS monitoring and removal staff, and that actual evil is not their priority at all. Thanks for publicly commenting on your side of this.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:20 PM
13

Yeah. For no good man in situation like that it would make sense to just go with 49 year old loser woman who will just "treat him nice" when there are millions of young, smart and honest women who will actually love the man like that. And who know the value of money due to not growing up in rich first world country.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 04:48 PM
29

It is kinda curious phenomena, that women from times of inequality... Were willing to die to preserve their way of living and society.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 09:31 AM
2

I mean sure, but that pointing out does not really make any sense, because everyone knows that when mods do something, bots are the ones executing it. Also, this topic title is "what is wrong with this sub". You can clearly see on the screenshot the message from the mod team of that subreddit, stating "This action was performed by a HUMAN moderator". Literally in the screenshot. Supported by the fact that it happened 2 hours after the comment. It wasn't a bot autoban in this case. No matter how …
/r/MensRights15/05/24 08:45 PM
3

Well, sure, they don't do it manually. But if person started the bot, gave it a rule and pressed button "ban everyone who matches this rule", can you really in good faith pretend that it is bot doing the banning, and not the person who runs it? When I press "Enter" on my PC and send this message. Did I send the message, with you reading what I wanted to say, or are you reading message sent by my computer and not me, because, after all, once I pressed enter, it was my PC who processed all the inf…
/r/MensRights15/05/24 04:35 PM
2

It is people who give the bot set of rules it uses to ban people. Duh?
/r/MensRights15/05/24 03:29 PM
4

The only ones I actually know myself basically put themselves in such situations on their own (yeah yeah, I know, victim blaming yada yada, I am not talking about that), because they were stupid enough to trust obviously violent people or place themselves into unsafe situations even man would not want to get in. Meanwhile, I know lot of examples of man around me getting into violent situations even in completely safe everyday environment.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:45 PM
17

Im not looking for legal recourse… I’m not wanting revenge or to expose her. Sorry, but you are being an idiot... You are ruining YOUR life, to bail her out from HER actions. When she crashed drinking again? You should had been there with the cops in tow, not "show up to get her to safety". I was honestly shocked when I got to that line. After all the shit she put you trough... You went and enabled her again instead of fixing your life. Moreover, for me, this would be more than just about our li…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 11:41 AM
17

I think there is key thing about clubs like this many are missing. Which is, publicly registered and known clubs like that no longer fit the purpose of elites who use them. They are fine using it for posturing and whatever, because the real spaces for them happen OUTSIDE of publicly registered clubs like this one. The clubs like this were always supposed to be private gatherings. Everyone in the world knowing about them kills one of the main of its purposes. So the main events are shifted into m…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:46 PM
7

Additionally, absolutely do not talk to them about any aspect of your sexuality, it only gives them ammunition We are at the point where people can't talk about that even to fellow men, because white knights will appear to do all the work of such women for them. And there are also married men who will work against their own best interests and those of other men, because they are too deep into being a hostage of the situation at this point.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 02:48 AM
3

Okay, the main problem right now in Ukraine is that people who ARE supposed to do "dirty work" are all the professional or trained military who sucked on taxes for last 30 years. The reasons civilians are okay with constantly paying those people for good life is because when war comes, there is a promise that THOSE people will be defending the country. But what happens right now is people who took tax money for decades are sitting behind the lines, or at the European borders, while they send new…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 04:39 PM
1

It is superstition that in such situation, this is what will happen - because it never actually happened in those situations across the history. Instead, nuclear families with one women giving birth to multiple children is what happened historically.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 11:12 PM
1

and "real world example" = you are a dummy, common sense tells you it is possible. AKA = there aren't any real world examples, making it not common sense at all, and just a common superstition.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:55 PM
10

But that logic only works on assumptions that: 1) Single women will be fine getting pregnant and raising kids solo (which is nonsense) 2) There is actual shortage of women going on, that necessitates their prioritization (again nonsense, there is no gender disbalance) Do you have any REAL examples from the last 500 years in which country used "few men running around to impregnate women"? Because as far as I know, even when population drops did happened... Despite your "need 1-2 years" argument, …
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:15 PM
6

1% disagrees, clearly.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 02:28 PM
1

Because not supporting lesser evil ends up supporting bigger one, not saying "fuck you" to it.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 09:13 PM
3

Yes it is. I am Ukrainian, from eastern Ukraine, so I would like to think I know. Russian army and agents came in civilian clothes and no insignias to eastern Ukraine and started taking over local governments. Hired stooges pretending to be civilians then blocked the roads to prevent Ukrainian military responding in time. Once things did not work out and Russia realized some regions (like Kharkiv where I am) actually uncovered their agents and take over failed, they switched into proxy war mode.…
/r/MensRights18/04/24 07:13 PM
5

And this comment right here is the prime example on why it is so hard to discuss any Ukraine related criticism now. Because the moment you do, people like this just HAVE to insert Russian propaganda into such discussion. You could not help yourself, could you? It was just required that you just pop in and post some Ru propaganda? And after months and months of inactivity as well. It is hard to tell if you are even real misguided person or just a stolen bot account. Edit: Watch this thread gettin…
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:55 PM
12

Because many don't understand the realities of their position. Often times, when such women are put into positions of living a life as if they were men, they change their mind super quickly.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 01:09 PM
10

Seems like "I made a statement without thinking, let me quickly say bunch of random BS that fits" kind of answer to me, if I am honest. If men could trade having a period once a month to have privilege in a society, most would likely do it with no second thought.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 01:07 PM
8

You can't say that in such context and never elaborate. Why?
/r/MensRights18/04/24 12:08 PM
3

Of course. But it did not, so facts are what it is. Not to mention Ukraine did it day 1, before it even knew if it needs it or not.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 08:14 PM
9

You are grasping for straws here, and I say this as a Ukrainian. The limitations Russian introduced are nothing like what we have here.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 04:30 AM
17

While that is true, the issue here, is that Russia does not ban men from leaving the country. It is true that it aligns with goals of Russian propaganda. But if actual reality aligns with enemy propaganda... Then questions SHOULD be asked.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 08:11 PM
6

Which border? The borders with EU might be guarded better than the frontline.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 08:08 PM
10

Yes, because they are not currently at war and need to do so. Ukraine also did not ban men from leaving its territory until the invasion. If world war started suddenly, you really think EU countries would not also ban men from leaving?
/r/MensRights07/04/24 08:06 PM
1

I honestly don't understand what you mean. Can you explain? I do not think of myself as jewish perse, but I am Ukrainian in Ukraine with some jewish ancestors.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 06:26 PM
3

Okay, so they were not "Ukrainian men of jewish descent", they were Israeli citizens. Nice try. Anyone with any foreign passport, even not one of Israel, could leave the same way.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 06:24 PM
3

And how exactly was that determined at the border? Ukrainian passports don't have origin or descent in them.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 09:42 AM
45

At this point, clearly never. Men were not allowed to leave from day 1. And even if something changes, it will be in the manner of "Hey, we gonna change the laws and all that... So you can leave the country in those next 3 months while we prepare for changes if you want, okay?" Because as usual, men will be treated as owing something to everyone, while women will be treated as children to be coddled.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 02:59 AM
29

The more important question, is why EU ignores the fact that gender equality is being ignored and does not make any comments to Ukraine about allowing men to evacuate with same rights as women.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 03:40 PM
7

What? You seriously expect people who think they have right to decide things like that to just go "oh fuck, you are right! How could we do something so unfair?". They do this because they have specific views and introduce their bias into enforcement of the law. Your argumentation about fairness is not going to do shit... Because they already give 0 shit about fairness. If they cared, they would not be introducing their biases into the system.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 06:26 PM
14

Watch their jaws drop. Their jaws won't drop. They will get annoyed and then proceed to do everything in their power to punish you for daring to call them out. Then once they ruin your life they will laugh at you and pat themselves on the back.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 06:18 PM
11

Remember when doctors had to take hippocratic or similar oath and took it so seriously, that even someone who was potentially just spouting rubbish would be provided attention, because doctors would take an oath to always help their patients very seriously?
/r/MensRights02/03/24 01:11 PM
6

That was not a study AFAIK, it was a protest or something like that. Iceland I think it was.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 03:41 PM
7

Rare win. Surprising amount of resolve in modern world where most people just suck it up and do nothing. Good luck!
/r/MensRights19/02/24 12:36 AM
24

Oh, it is perfectly logical. They want you to believe unquestionably BECAUSE they want woman to have power to lie and be believed.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 07:15 AM
27

Which, funnily, often results in boys only families providing better environment for those boys.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:44 AM
13

Men should do the same thing Uhm, no, men should just have 0 tolerance to that shit and leave the moment such abuse starts happening. The only reason things like that are possible is because men who get it have no self-respect to stand up for themselves anymore. It would end really quick if any such bullshit resulted in women being left alone on the spot.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 02:28 PM
26

"It takes a real man to become best girl".
/r/MensRights20/01/24 08:44 PM
2

From what I understand, this is "No, this child is legally not mine anymore" before the child is even born.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 09:09 PM
8

Ironically, when you talk to a lot of MTF transitioners, this is exactly the case. But most of them don't even realize it despite describing that exactly.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 03:33 AM
50

Give us an update when you talk to owner!
/r/MensRights03/01/24 02:36 PM
31

Yup. But the govs really do not like the idea of that - because at some point, economic interests apparently grown more important than maintaining fairness and ideas behind founding documents of many nations. Mandatory testing would result in state having to pick up the slack for cheaters, instead of random innocent men doing it. Many founding documents list many foundational principles in them... And most of them do not have clauses like "economic benefit takes priority when waged against those…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 12:56 PM
3

No, nothing will change with attitude of doing superficial stupid stuff the purpose of which is to pat yourself on the back and say "I did something!" despite knowing that you did jack shit. For things to change, the actions need to be meaningful and lead to productive changes. Channeling people motivation into doing things that do not work is how you manipulate people into never achieving things they want.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 02:58 PM
3

Yeah, any time something like that gets pushed, I always ask "okay, so what happens if people sign this?" and the answer is either "nothing" or just silence. This is basically what is called "copium" behavior - doing pointless stuff that does not actually do anything because you want to feel like you did something. If you want the change, do stuff that matters, not pointless stuff that just makes people pat themselves on the back after doing something easy and thinking "now I don't really need t…
/r/MensRights27/12/23 11:35 AM
8

Yup. Looked at mine. I spent most of the time in highly controversial subreddits, with mens rights being pretty mild one. Not a peep of any of them in my recap. It is perfectly clear that there is list of subreddits that is in "filter it out" list.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 09:35 AM
20

Kids are not a waste. But having them before you are financially stable is not optimal - because you are creating a money hole that ensures you will use your most productive years on them instead of building financial stability.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 09:21 PM
51

And if you would, why would you marry EARLY. Marrying early practically ensures financial ruin. Marrying late ensures you have financial stability. In theory, having dual income should mean great financial future. In reality, most early marriages end up wasting shitload of money on stupid shit, kids or losses in a divorce later. Then you have 30-40 year old guys that worked their asses 2 decades and have nothing to show for it, while their unmarried peers approach 7 digit networth.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 08:41 PM
7

Nothing in their comment implied that "women don't want to fuck" them or what their qualities as a male are.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 09:39 AM
6

but their brains aren't as strong and don't perform as well Is this actually scientifically accurate?
/r/MensRights23/11/23 07:32 AM
3

How ironic this chain of messages is, holy shit...
/r/MensRights22/11/23 12:39 PM
1

The moment you do that, they will get ultra pissed and just bull rush you with their weight, which you won't be able to do anything about due to weight difference. One throat punch will hurt them, but won't stop them. Losing their breath hurts but they will have 30 seconds to reach. On the other hand, one hit in the head from them, and you are completely incapacitated. I hope you will never be foolish enough to suggest someone small to fight someone big, or do it yourself, because it might end v…
/r/MensRights21/11/23 02:04 AM
1

? What are you talking about, I am Ukrainian, currently still in the east. I don't need "media" when I'm here personally... No clue what you are on about.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 02:04 AM
11

Martial arts could make a world of difference. No they don't. It is just another bullshit sold to people. Martial arts require your opponents to be WITHIN your weight class. The moment there is 2x difference in weight, martial arts simply... Stop working. Even on unskilled opponent. Many martial artists who tried to claim what you do ended up being beat up by bigger, unskilled opponents. Martial arts use normal physics and bodily mechanics. Those are not magical. You can learn to use them, but i…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 08:20 AM
1

But this is literally not the case? There are no Americans shedding blood over Ukraine aside from really rare cases of volunteers who would be like one per 10 000 Ukrainians.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 03:10 AM
8

Did you just completely ignore the link to NIPP I gave to that part of your argument? Many people will do NIPP anyway even without paternity concerns - simply for potential genetic issues.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 01:58 AM
9

What kind of amendments you are talking about? Like courts won't ignore all of that if it means that there is no parent they could get child support from... Surely just taking DNA test in advance is way easier than that bullshit you are suggesting and subsequent legal battles.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 01:34 AM
19

The best time to test is after birth By that time you will already be asked to sign the birth certificate in lots of the places. And having DNA test AFTER signing birth certificate can still leave you hooked for life despite it not being your child. It's a very invasive and (potentially) dangerous test to aspirate some fluid from the woman for a test. https://alphabiolabsusa.com/learning-center/paternity-testing-while-pregnant/#nipp
/r/MensRights19/11/23 01:06 AM
8

A relationship is based on trust. Trusting comes out of absolute knowledge that they got your back. Observing facts of them, indeed having your back does not "break" trust, it builds it up more. Your whole point is basically "you should trust someone blindly without building that trust". And that aint no trust, that's stupidity. You trust builder to build you something not because they said they will. You trust them because they build stuff in the past and can show you their projects if you ask.…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 12:41 AM
2

Things won't work the same anymore, common Joes will be more and more replaceable, until culmination in appearance of caste of the society that does not need 90% of other humanity to continue existing in their lifestyle. There is coming literal hard divide in humanity - people who embrace AI and will no longer need people outside of the AI sphere, and rest of the planet. Applying 14th century lessons to 21th will just set you up for a failure. At some point, Joes disappearing from the market wil…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 12:31 AM
27

I think you are missing some point from the OP. If you are doing test AFTER the fact, you already wasted shitload of time and money on someone who just betrayed you. That you do not have test done until that moment also means you have not talked with your partner about such views before hand. What OP suggests is to filter people like that out BEFORE you get tied in with them.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 12:26 AM
3

You are missing the point. It is not about "men should not be fighting for their country". It is about "ONLY men should be fighting for their country". If first was "all people", not specifically men, it would not be that big of an issue - because equality is a part of constitution and human rights. The problem is that equality is a lie and laws about it get just... ignored.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 11:27 PM
0

I have no doubts Zelenskyy will end up a millionaire on the international public speaking circuit Just to be clear - he was millionaire with multiple successful businesses way before he got into politics, so him being wealthy got nothing to do with his current actions.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 11:16 PM
46

These Hollywood strikers demanding no AI involvement It is just currently popular workers trying to get their royalties and profits and then pulling the ladder after themselves, so no new generation of actors can benefit from Hollywood anymore. Because if they succeed, they will make it toxic to promote new actors into popularity, and no one will want that - so they will use AI for any "unknown actor role", resulting in new personalities that get viral and popular in being AI owned by producers …
/r/MensRights14/11/23 08:46 PM
61

The only logical thing that comes to mind is that she was one of the rare cases of women who are eligible for draft and was attempting to dodge it by getting pregnant.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 12:23 PM
5

The biggest driving force behind drafting young men to war are... Older men who joined military as a career in times of peace. Now they have higher ranks, connections and good life, but have no interest is dying and giving all that up. So they need someone to take their place - and drafting civilians into the army to send to front is what they do. They are the ones who have power in the military, so in times of war, of course they will do everything in their power to send others to war, not them…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 06:59 AM
21

What is wrong with being anti-immigration redneck? Out of context your statement seems a bit wack.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 03:51 PM
19

No, the outcome will be whole generation of young man starting to immigrate out of the country to places where they are not treated like that or segregating in "man only" communities/work places. With growing new economies and low birthrates, this can be pretty disastrous for US if it really comes to pass. Right now the economy holds people back, but with remote working and economic rise of alternative work destinations, young man might literally start going away. The more toxic environment beco…
/r/MensRights02/11/23 06:44 PM
3

Lot of cases of utter incompetence of therapists, ranging from just incompetence towards flat out manipulation or predatory behavior. I can never recommend therapy to anyone now, simply due to the fact that even if only 10% of them are bad, you have no way of knowing if you stumbled upon bad one until its to late. And the risk of coming out even worse makes it not worth it. Therapy organizations across the world lost all credibility due to how they refused to reevaluate professionalism and certi…
/r/MensRights02/11/23 02:57 PM
26

Theoretical definitions of what it is supposed to be and practical reality of what people of that movement pursue are different things. Practical reality does not always follow written ideas.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 09:03 AM
8

Right, but do you think you understand full perspective of what your life experience would be if you were not circumcised? As in, if you would live 5 years circumcised, and 5 years not, and then had to pick which one to be the rest of your life. Do you think in such case you would still pick being circumcised or not care?
/r/MensRights18/10/23 10:12 PM
32

Plenty of examples of women just discarding the man during war here in Ukraine. Lot of soldiers went to the front while sending their wives to EU for safety. Several months later they are divorced while the wives gets together with someone from EU to get citizenship and stay there instead. Lot will die, too, and wives just collect all the benefit and run off to marry someone in EU while it is hot. Not very popular topic to talk about now due to existential threat and war, but will likely become …
/r/MensRights18/10/23 08:12 AM
1

what is the problem with talking or even trying to seduce a woman respectfully ? And why exactly THAT is your topic when this is not what he was doing? In this very video he is using the footage of a girl that said, in clear language, "I am alright, thanks" and refused to be in his video... Only for him to post video of her in his video anyway.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 06:42 PM
2

1) He was accused of harassment, not "sexual harassment", and that accusation is true - he was harassing campus members while not being one 2) You are taking his word at a face value, while his literal job is selling people who believe him his crap
/r/MensRights15/10/23 04:15 PM
1

I am with you. The guy INTENTIONALLY named the video what he did. HE is the one intentionally attempting to create conflict and controversy. "I got expelled" my ass. He even says in the video that "expelled" is wrong word and gives examples of better ones. Meaning that HE KNOWS he is using misleading and wrong language, but chose to do it anyway. Should tell everyone everything they need to know about him in first 1.5 minute of the video, yet here we are. Classic "Sorry for using the wrong langu…
/r/MensRights15/10/23 03:59 PM
3

Well yes, I am not "dog person", I am human person, who happened to have ton of different animals at different points of my life, dogs and cats both included. she was so excited to see me, she sang and danced for 30+ minutes. Right. And how is that makes it "unconditional"? She is literally conditioned to see you as the most important thing in her life, of course she will be happy. Because that is her condition. She did not suddenly see you on the street while being a pup and stranger to you and…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:44 PM
5

You do feed them and give them home, don't you? It is mistake to think that animal attachment to you is unconditional love. If anything, it is the most conditional thing possible, because it is built on all the conditioning they got since they were born and raised in captivity.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter