TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ethos1983 Archive

View 0 posts and 76 comments by ethos1983 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

No, it happens....it's just not statistically significant. So fuck'em. wish i could /s this, but that's the argument I've been told when i bring this up.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 01:29 AM
3

I agree with you 100% that it should be "teach about consent". That's not what's being presented. It's being presented as a male-oriented problem, linked to "the patriarchy" and "toxic male behavior" and "male privilege", and that's that. As a mental health worker who has had to explain to children that heard this that "you're not broken, you're not gonna hurt people the way your mom or dad hurt you", the "teach men not to rape" hashtag not only missed the fucking mark, it's doing vastly more ha…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 01:40 AM
1

Ever explain to an 8 year old rape victim that "its ok, you're not broken, you're not gonna hurt someone like your mom hurt you?" Because I've had to do that thanks to this theory. Fuck "teach men not to rape".
/r/MensRights22/09/18 01:09 AM
4

It is understood the mother was never charged with abduction or other criminal offences. But on Friday she pleaded guilty to contempt of court for breaching the custody arrangement. Bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 05:15 PM
1

Majored in Psychology, honor society, blah blah blah. The number of times i was the token dude was moderately amusing. Great when i was looking to date, not so much when we started profiling serial killers.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 05:51 AM
3

"Budding Patriarchs". Anyone who defines a human being as an enemy first isn't here to help you.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 02:08 AM
2

Is that still true if fully transitioned though? I remember there was a court case or some shit ongoing a couple years ago. Not sure if it was ever resolved
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:40 PM
0

Even more fun, if your female to male trans, and fully transition to male after the age of 26? Now your in trouble, because you never registered for the draft. Legally, you're a guy now. What's your excuse?
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:25 PM
9

Originally upheld based on two reasons: 1) the different military branches did not allow women in front line, combat roles. 2) if a draft was re-instituted, it would be primarily for front line, combat roles. Therefore, women weren't needed. I disagree with it, but that was the reasoning. I wanna say the case made it to the Supreme Court
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:23 PM
52

I'll give the National Organization of Women credit where it's due; they officially stated they were against the Draft back in the 80's. If there was gonna be a draft, it needed to be fair and equitable. Not just against one gender. Good on them. Seriously. That's a stance i can support. Equality. That was almost 40 years ago. Aside from the occasional token "it should be fair!" articles written by an intern, what meaningful steps have they taken? Lobbying? Any proof whatsoever that their commit…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:26 AM
1

That homelessness in Vancouver is on the rise. 0.31% of Vancouver's population was homeless, living either on the street or in homeless shelters. This is the highest level it's been at since they started counting in 2005. That's it. Except for this one graphic, nothing else in the article mentions gender. Prices are expensive, the lowest earners can't afford rent, more people are coming to various organizations for any help or job to avoid going on the street, and it's not enough. The graphic is…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:36 AM
1

As did I. Now please show me where this email is on his professional resume. That's my point. Not that this teacher may or may not exist, but the email. You know, the incriminating thing.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:49 AM
41

Do both.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:19 AM
6

would love to see this (or something like it) stickied on the main page.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 12:51 AM
149

Here; fill this out.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 12:25 AM
1

Really? What college did you go to? Am a psych grade, and while we certainly went over Freud and the neo-freudian psychologists, "Father of modern psychology" is a hell of a stretch
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:31 PM
1

Dont forget peewee herman. He only touched himself.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:34 AM
10

I disagree. The author of this piece also wrote "to hell with the witch hunt" and other articles flatly denying any type of mistake with sexual allegations could be made. No mistake, no witch hunt, no dissent. Only now the target is someone she likes. Now its the privileged white female hunter packs at fault. Sorry, she's a little to late for her lamentations
/r/MensRights15/01/18 07:31 PM
33

I thought it would take a little longer for the hit squad of privileged young white women to open fire on brown-skinned men. I had assumed that, on the basis of intersectionality and all that, they’d stay laser focused on college-educated white men for another few months. But we’re at warp speed now, and the revolution—in many ways so good and so important—is starting to sweep up all sorts of people into its conflagration: the monstrous, the cruel, and the simply unlucky. No. Just no. Justice is…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 06:36 PM
42

You underestimate their power. "Something something internalized coon misogeny". Bigots will always have an excuse for why their bigotry is ok, and everyone else's is hatred. Always. Whether it's using the bible to justify slavery and racism (I'm not hating them, god cursed'em, it's god's will!), Social Darwinism (I'm not hating them, they're poor, meaning not as fit to survive. It's just the way it is!) or -Ism= Power + Prejudice (I can't be sexist/racist/whatever. The group that person belongs…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 05:03 PM
7

absence of hierarchy Someone's never worked in an office that's mostly women before.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 07:33 PM
15

$30/hr? Where do you work? My name is...ummm...Susan. Or will be.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 05:45 PM
0

Not for several years now.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 06:45 PM
98

Or his rapist would go on to have a stand-up comedy career bragging about raping him.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 07:49 PM
2

One thing that used to always bug me was that those diaper changing stations were never in any men's rooms I used. Ditto. Learned very quickly to pack a changing cloth to lay out on a counter or across my lap to change my baby girl's diaper. Got fairly skilled at the "change your daughter on your lap while stuck in a tiny-ass stall" game.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:11 AM
1

Degree-based jobs are all about the long run; over time, you make substantially more. Your up-front, start-up pay isn't really all that much higher. And while your pay is slowly going up....so is your debt. Yay interest.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 05:21 PM
5

It takes longer because women not only go to college more, but grad school more; and thus accumulate more debt. More debt takes longer to pay off than less debt.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:53 AM
21

Used to work in a psych hospital, specialized on the childrens floor, though when your a 6'2" 250lb vet, they tend to stick you with the more dangerous/adult patients. Because of that, I worked with quite a few patients in their 30's, 40's, and even 50's that were still quite borked by traumatic events in their childhood. One man had been raped by his mother (sorry, had "unwanted sexual contact" with, we all know me are immune to rape ><), and even in his 40's refused to be within arms length of…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:05 AM
12

Basically, yeah. "Famous for being famous" was kinda her schtick back in the day.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:06 AM
13

"When you were raped, and told that it was because of your clothes and nature, that was a crime. We've spent years fighting against that "look how short her skirt was" mentality." "When I was raped, i was lucky. I obviously wanted it. Everyone knows Men want it." We know what was said to women was wrong. Many of us have fought against that viewpoint most of our lives. So why are you throwing those exact same words against us? Telling us that we're innately monsters who enjoy raping people, and m…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 05:49 PM
1

After reading this and other posts on the site...has to be a joke/satire. Can't be real. No one is that obviously dumb.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:30 PM
14

Went to college for psychology (bs only so far). Without fail, in my psych classes, I was one of 1-2 guys in a 30+ person class. Great when I wanted a date, not so much when we started profiling serial killers, lol.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 08:49 AM
5

Used to work at a psych facility with children. The number of times i'd hear shit like that was annoying as hell. I worked on the"enhanced" unit (violence problems, FAS kids, bipolar, basically kids that couldn't really deal with large groups), and getting pulled off the unit because a woman wanted to work there instead and quote "women are better with kids than men can be"....yeah.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 02:13 PM
2

Just because I was smart enough to deploy to a Holiday Inn instead of the desert doesnt mean you need to hate =p
/r/MensRights21/06/16 11:24 PM
2

Old habit/joke. I was AF, but due to my afsc I worked with them/trained along side them. Guysbi worked with always called me "chair force", because as we all know, AF are pussies that dont actually do anything. So, regardless of what they actually were, soldiers. Or weekend warrior if I felt like getting in a fight, lol.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 08:36 PM
-1

Full out? Cause that sure as hell wasnt how I was trained. Regardless of the branch (was air force, ended up training with the army during my last few years due to my afsc), you fought, sure...but not full out. Not "hold nothing back", "full force punches". Thats how good troops get injured, then the mission suffers because the unit is at half strength.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 05:58 PM
-4

Because those are your fellow soldiers, teammates, and people you need to trust, not isis operatives. Went through that training. You're told to not take cheap shots like he did.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:05 PM
1

"Most likely they were told to go until told to stop". As someone who went through that training....no, no there weren't.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:04 PM
-8

It's really not how we're trained. In crappy hollywood movies, maybe. Not in real life.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 02:23 PM
-4

Yeah, absolutely. Once your opponent is down, show some sportsmanship.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 01:12 PM
9

They didnt. They grabbed him because, once she hit the ground, you can see him going for more swings at her. They'd stop the fight if any jackass did that. Battle or a real fight is one thing. Training you dont do that shit.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 08:41 AM
3

This article is something you may want to read. Basically, most military suicides aren't combat vets. There's another article i'm trying to find again...something like 50% of military suicides were guys who had non-combat jobs. Really threw a wrench in what most people think of.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 09:51 PM
3

I'd wager it's the same. Seemed like it when I was in, anyway. However, we have to be sure. I partially disagree with your analogy about cops killing white people, specifically because it mentions civilian vs military. The article (shitty clickbait headline aside) isn't saying female suicide victims are more important. It's saying their much higher than one would expect, and not a lot of attention has been paid to this. It even point out that it's because men tend to make up about 90% of the mil…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 06:56 AM
23

They're not excluding anyone. In order to solve a problem, you need the correct question. The difference between suicide rates for female military vs non military is much higher than male military vs non military. The question is: Is it because women in the military face an additional stressor that men either dont or already face in the civilian sector, thus inflating the women's number above what we would expect? Or is it because military members face the same stressors, regardless of gender, w…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 06:39 AM
1

Depends on your job. When I was in, my job required me to have a specific status called PRP. Because my job related to nuclear ordinance (I was an aviation mechanic on nuclear-capable bombers), I had to maintain this status. We had a small index card that listed all of the medication you were allowed to take (for example, only basic robitussun, not even sinus or cold & flu, etc) and so on. If you lost your status, you weren't allowed to be on the job alone. Had to have an escort at all times, ju…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 06:33 AM
4

Their suicide rate is so high that it approaches that of male veterans, a finding that surprised researchers because men generally are far more likely than women to commit suicide. Thats the important part. Raises an interesting question, as well. Is the female military member suicide rate similar to male rate because woman face an additional stressor, thus raising their numbers to match (as they are typically lower than male "success" rates)? Or is it because males and females in the military f…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 05:52 AM
3

One time, I agreed to meet with this guy at 8 or 9 at night. Before we met, I said to him, ‘This is the work I do, I know the chief of police ... so, don't try and get creepy; I know all my rights.’ And five minutes later, he was like, ‘Actually, I'm really not OK with how you just assume I'm a bad guy. And I get very bad vibes from that, so we shouldn't hang out anymore.’” "I was in a rage. He was a total fuckboy about consent,” she said. ....really?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 11:02 AM
4

Who wants to bet there will be people sympathizing with this woman and trying to blame the father for "forcing" this monster to kill her kids? First sentence: A mother accused of killing her three sons was dominated and isolated by her husband, a man nearly twice her age who had been her own mother’s live-in boyfriend before they married, authorities said Wednesday.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 10:54 PM
1

Woman kills her three sons because her husband wasn't paying enough attention to her and her daughter. Ok, that's horrible. First sentence of the article? Blames it all on the fucking husband. Really?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 10:50 PM
2

Maybe it's a non-case now? The article is over two years old.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 02:49 PM
0

Because a marriage certificate isn't consent, as has been repeatedly established by the courts. This is consent, and the few seconds it records isn't enough to sit down and list everything that person is consenting to. Thus, as a false rape preventer, it fails because it goes right back to a he-said, she - said argument. Only this time, more "evidence" is on the side of the accused.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:18 AM
1

Politics aside, I can see one potential problem. Man and woman hook up, agree to have sex, use app. Man slips it into her ass. Woman does not want this, yells for him to stop, tries to get him to stop. Man continues. "But Officer, it was entirely consensual. Here's the proof."
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:31 AM
11

But she's a woman, and gender is more important than anything else, so therefore it has everything to do with her being a woman! ><
/r/MensRights13/07/15 12:56 AM
1

Not...entirely. It's the same condition, we just didn't fully understand it for years. It was originally called "shell shocked" because people thought what you just said; it happens in the thick of combat. Later we discovered that repeated exposure to combat could cause the same symptoms, so we changed the name. Then we had "non-combatants" showing the same symptoms, and our knowledge expanded. Eventually, we compared the symptoms to survivors of horrific non-combat tragedy (such as rape) and di…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:21 AM
2

She in fact has admitted that, for an earlier article for which she won "the Rolling Stone College Journalism competition", she never interviewed the subject of her article, and that "just about everything in the story was wrong." So Sabrina Rubin Erdely has a history of inaccurate reporting, and Rolling Stone has a history of rewarding her for it. That....that's like the character description for either the villain or the lead in a shitty novel.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:31 AM
2

While i want to agree with you, I'd say those dudes have been through enough. Put up an ad, give them an opportunity to come forward, but don't track'em down. While we all know that all those guys did was lose a few facebook friends, and they're all fine <sigh>, I'm sure a solid chunk of them want nothing more than to be invisible and move the hell on. To entirely too many people, Jackie was right, regardless of what the law or facts say. People that may become employers, coworkers, loved ones. …
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:29 AM
5

I'm a former member of the USAF. My job involved working on aircraft, originally heavy bombers. During my stint in the military, there was a huge disparity between men and women as far as physical training standards. If I recall correctly (and its been a few years, so feel free to correct me if i'm no longer accurate), an 18 year old woman had to pass the same physical standards as a man in his late 40s to early 50s. That is insulting to men and women both. Of course, princess. Your just as good…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:59 AM
1

This website would seem to disagree. 3 million men are physically abused, while 4 million women are victims of physical abuse and rape (which would increase their numbers). The way the hotline is worded, the help for men comes across as an afterthought. "If your going to abuse your spouse, call us!!! Oh, and if she's hitting you, we can help with that too.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:58 PM
3

Honestly, it makes sense from a police point of view(stay with me here; I dont agree with it, but I've seen this happen enough times in the past). Most of the women arrested for prostitution will be given a choice; do time, or be used in a sting operation to help arrest more "johns". Arrest enough johns, demand for prostitution goes down, so all those prostitutes will...I dunno...finally get that law degree. Or something. Source: when I was younger, I bused tables at a Howard Johnson's restauran…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 07:16 AM
2

Whatever happened to a strong single mother that doesnt need any man? That shit's expensive. Thats what happened.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 10:27 PM
2

I keep hoping this is satire, a la "A Modest Proposal". Please let this be satire...
/r/MensRights17/01/15 07:35 PM
4

But... all that happens to those falsely accused is they lose a few facebook friends!
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:35 PM
41

Yeah, thats what she said. Men are criminals.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 07:41 AM
16

Ohhhhh, I see. The boy wanted it. Just look at what he was wearing! /sarcasm. So what, its not really pedophilia if you can convince your victim they want it? Good to know ><
/r/MensRights18/10/14 04:11 AM
7

This is a troll article, right? The casual smugness, the "common sense" line, even the title picture are all obviously designed to generate outrage. This cant be real.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 10:07 AM
2

Heh if I could tell half of'em, i'd give up all this hard work and become a standup comedian :p And thank you :)
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:10 PM
2

I have a bachelors in Psychology that enabled me to get a high school diploma level job at a mental facility paying on par with the bookstore. Only now I get to deal with potentially violent patients to make that sweet sweet minimum wage. To be fair, thats more where i'm living than anything else. Working on that. Trying for my masters, but its hard to be able to drop the money for my GRE when i'm living paycheck to paycheck.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:59 PM
2

Same to you, my man.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:40 PM
1

I'm in the same boat. Former aircraft tech, Ssgt, supervised nine troops, left the USAF and found a wonderful job at a bookstore making minimum wage ><
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:21 AM
1

Intention-wise, I completely agree with you. I'm pretty sure (or at least as certain as someone with no first-hand experience of the events can be) that this was gender-based. However, "I'm pretty sure this is why" vs a 7-minute manifesto stating "This is fucking why!"? That's not a good parallel, to me. Now, this was in 2010. Does anyone know if she later confessed, or otherwise stated "Yeah, I killed them because of privilege?"
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:00 AM
1

Hey, sorry for the delay in response. Yay work shifts =( Anyways, for your three points; A) Was his gender the reason? Or was the brother simply a target of opportunity, for lack of a better term? B) Was she specifically targeting the men, or were they simply the ones who had sat closest to her in the meeting? When dealing with the concept of an -ism, that's important. It'd be like me getting pissed off at all white people in my work, and going on a rampage at the next store meeting. However, be…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 11:57 PM
11

A mentally unstable person had access to weapons they probably shouldn't have. Gender shouldn't have anything to do with it. Though, to be fair, she didnt also post a video screaming about her hatred of men, and how men owed her. By my understanding, thats the part that has feminists pissed off with this latest shooting. In contrast, Dr. Bishop wasnt (even if just in appearances) targeting people because of their gender. Also, maybe this makes me a dick, but the day being saved by "professor mor…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:18 AM
16

Would it be possible to get the other five guys you mentioned together with a lawyer? Or have the lawyer contact them; show that you're not trying to manipulate things. Anyway, if she really did do this to five other guys, it could show a pattern your lawyer can use. More importantly, getting a lawyer shows one thing: you're innocent, or at least willing to fight to prove it. If you were guilty, you'd probably just accept the schools punishment and go about your business. By threatening true leg…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 07:24 AM
22

Innocent until proven guilty is one of the cornerstones of our legal system. It's not "innocent until proven guilty unless I really don't like the crime you may or may not have done. Then you're fucking guilty." But hey, the fact that I think both rape is wrong and the treatment before any type of criminal trial of this man is wrong means I support rape. So ignore me.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:21 PM
1

This always irritated me. As a woman under 30, you have to do 3 more pushups than your male peer to meet the same requirements... ...Provided the male peer is aged 50-59. I get sexual dimorphism, men and women have different strengths, etc...but really? 3 pushups more than someone 20-30 years older than you? Run time is the same, situps the same, That's equal pay for equal work? Source
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:12 AM
6

Well, without being there I obviously cant know for sure, but I can think of a few reasons that 50 year old engineer didn't help you with lifting a heavy bag over your head. None of them are related to chivalry, though.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter