TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

euphobot Archive

View 17 posts and 88 comments by euphobot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
173

False Accusationeuphobot/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:05 PM
105

Feminismeuphobot/r/MensRights22/03/15 11:16 AM
43

Feminismeuphobot/r/MensRights06/07/15 06:08 AM
19

Men's Rights Newseuphobot/r/MensRights20/05/14 08:31 PM
19

euphobot/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:42 PM
19

euphobot/r/MensRights03/09/14 03:49 PM
17

Action Op.euphobot/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:36 PM
17

Newseuphobot/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:04 AM
16

Discriminationeuphobot/r/MensRights07/02/16 07:48 PM
15

re: Feminismeuphobot/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:56 PM
14

euphobot/r/MensRights28/06/14 06:02 PM
8

Newseuphobot/r/MensRights27/11/14 06:14 PM
7

Activism/Supporteuphobot/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:39 PM
4

Activism/Supporteuphobot/r/MensRights29/08/16 03:16 AM
2

Action Op.euphobot/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:46 PM
1

Activism/Supporteuphobot/r/MensRights18/06/15 02:06 AM
0

Activism/Supporteuphobot/r/MensRights23/06/15 10:36 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

According to IMDB ratings, the film was well received among those who actually watched it with avg. rating of 8.9, however less than 10% of the audience was female -- not ideal for "bringing us together." Two factors are at work, 1) females don't see movies as much as males, and 2) feminists have scared away females. Although men and women all have issues, feminists seem to profit from destroying every public discussion. It is a case of "tragedy of the commons" where feminists believe they can i…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:17 PM
1

Something feminists won't change
/r/MensRights16/06/16 03:12 AM
2

The amazing part is that twice as many women support Hillary than feminists. pretty good illusion.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 12:59 AM
1

The explanation given in the linked example does not appear to be in compliance with US Fed Regulation. Especially see "§ 1604.2Sex as a bona fide occupational qualification" here. "EEO group" only refers to job types, not women. The regulations refer to types of discrimination such as sex based discrimination, so demographics are only examples.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:15 PM
21

Not only harsher penalties, an innocent man will face a tougher, more cavalier due process.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:31 PM
1

First feminst firing. More needed.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 04:31 PM
1

George Will mentions Minnesota in his "A Progressive's Guide to Political Correctness" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiU20QjKPCo&feature=youtu.?t=4m22s
/r/MensRights16/02/16 05:02 PM
0

quota
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:17 PM
2

Funny she never mentioned the draft before female draft was in court. Now she has concerns.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 09:04 PM
2

blocked in US
/r/MensRights09/02/16 08:45 PM
1

Right. The focus and flow are missing. Rather than a flowchart the simplest would be to use html: link the phrases to popups (so you don't lose your place). oh! and on each popup along with the referenced text show source and the connecting thought. Could be a big winner if you can convey simple things to a bigger audience.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 05:02 PM
5

I am guessing that comments on HufPo have been severely editted. Is that true? The original '48 Things Women...' has only 85 comments, far fewer than the 300+ on '48 Things Men...' Also remaining comments refer to comments by men that don't seem to exist. If true, it is a pretty good example of feminist habit, and HufPo association.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 05:23 PM
6

The Atty Gen Lorretta Lynch is the real pig in this mess. https://youtu.be/FX-viencI9w?t=17m41s
/r/MensRights21/12/15 10:13 AM
2

This could not have occurred without help, intentional or not, from politicians. Unless we unelect them, it will happen again. As attractive a solution as this is, it far from the resources of a father in crisis. Parents definitely have power as 80% of voters. So an organization of parents could definitely be effective if it was aware of the risks facing parents and was able to communicate, but doesn't exist today, and is not something parents in crisis will create. How can this be done?
/r/MensRights22/11/15 04:07 PM
1

Fantastic! Glad you are able to follow this inroad. Of course there is a bigger picture which includes flakey govt child policy particularly in family court and CPS. Not surprising all of this separates parents and kids and results in dropouts. Sad to see teachers ignorantly cheering this.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:13 PM
1

hen pecked
/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:58 PM
12

I too have seen some amazing anti-dad behavior by schools. I think there is actually a deeper teacher union vs parents barrier. It is a dumb habit to blame parents because the real problem bring down kids' achievement is parents missing from the lives of kids. Yours is a well told story, helped by being a psychologist. There are many supporting studies, the best two are a 1997 big study by Dept of Ed showing parent involvement of dad raising GPA one full point; the other is Robert Bauserman's me…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 06:22 PM
41

19 Harvard Law Profs condemn the film as biased and inaccurate. http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2015/11/13/hls-profs-challenge-doc/
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:33 PM
2

why would anyone draw attention to this?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 02:27 AM
2

There is nothing that scientifically supports the idea that women attempt suicide more than men. In fact there is nothing that shows where the rumor came from. It certainly has been persistent especially on feminist influenced sites.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:25 PM
1

Regarding your "Edit 11-10-15", tit for tat is a bad idea. Lawyer should say that. However if you file a complaint first, then taking the training under duress your complaint is still valid. The school if given a chance might want to back off, but if not duress is established. There are some lawyers already working the due process claims such as sexual assault claims. They might consult for low price.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:18 PM
9

lookup "wrongful termination"
/r/MensRights29/10/15 10:10 AM
1

Feminists want more women to get killed. MISOGYNY!!!
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:18 PM
21

Another example of women standing up against discrimination BS feminist tripe. We need more.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 05:18 PM
1

Advertisers love violent women. Its dramatic and showy... Nike says just do it.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 04:00 PM
9

In California at least anti-discrimination applies to any business including non profits. The sense of this is simply you can't hang a sign on your saloon, "no jews".
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:48 PM
3

link here http://domesticviolenceresearch.org/ 130 of the best researchers.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 05:46 PM
4

I believe the attack on open source began before the attack on gamers. As far as I know there is no reason, i.e. no discrimination problem in open source -- likely because it is "open". In fact it is an extreme meritocracy. While the PC or SJW attack is meritless, there is a threat to the productivity and creativity of open source in that the attackers can turn it into a battleground and hence into a waste land. The damage would extend beyond developers to users. That could move software back in…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 03:13 PM
2

author of the piece
/r/MensRights12/07/15 10:28 PM
11

Go Kindra! Absolutely time to honor men and women acting like adults, and teach SJWs better.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 08:52 PM
3

More than Pao needs to go. “The attacks were worse on Ellen because she is a woman,” said Sam Altman, a member of the Reddit board. “And that’s just a shame against humanity.”
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:32 AM
3

The Cdn libertarian response has been strong possibly because Lauren has more YouTube subcribers than the total Libertarian Party. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/02/canadian-libertarians-in-revolt-after-party-leadership-suspends-anti-feminist-candidate-lauren-southern/
/r/MensRights04/07/15 01:42 AM
7

Lauren does YET again!
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:53 PM
1

There is no evidence that fathers "choose" to leave or avoid their children anymore than mothers and both are small. Of real significance are barriers maintained by court and county services. Fathers face huge uphill battle just to get close to even custody. No matter what fathers do they usually must settle for less. It would be cynical to call this "choose."
/r/MensRights24/06/15 09:30 PM
1

There is no such tendency. Worst problem for kids and parents of any color is the same: corruption in family court and county child policies that stupidly based on Federal incentives to separate kids from parents.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 10:45 AM
1

thanks, see above.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 04:17 PM
1

OK. No source specific to Jeb, but I think reliably implied from the quote Asked by an attendee why he would be in favor of shaming single mothers, Bush said, "I'm not in favor of shaming women. What I'm in favor of is shaming men who abandon their children." which is ignorant of survey results showing more than 80% of women are for equal treatment, against feminism, and understand discrimination is harming families. One of those surveys here. The trend shows feminist supporters aligned with Dem…
/r/MensRights22/06/15 03:58 PM
4

This is the first time I have seen six people interested in Gene Sharp and MRM. However there is a Gene Sharp FB group with 300 members. A post on men's issues might get one or two likes. Every one of your suggestions is a big leap from anything done today. There are good people talking issues, but no one talking tactics or solutions.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 09:55 AM
0

what is it that you needed a source?
/r/MensRights19/06/15 09:01 AM
3

The problem is that Jeb believes harsh feminist rhetoric represents real women or actually influence women who might vote for him. This is simply wrong. HOWEVER it is our fault for not educating him and leading him to better strategies like leading real women against far left feminist BS.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 05:20 PM
20

not all women --- US women's support for feminism has dropped to less than 18%. Other countries, notably in Europe, are less than that. So not a need or a want.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:23 PM
0

Dealing with a false charge of rape can take years to purge and there will always be someone who thinks it might be true. The consequences are huge, and some feel so hopeless and shamed that they suicide. So you are not being very aware.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:13 PM
8

An even smaller percent (1-5%) are the "death grip feminists." Recent defeats like #GamerGate, atheism plus, and Rolling Stone rape are related to the realization that feminists are really a loud minority, and willingness of a few including remarkable women who are willing to go toe to toe to challenge the shrill. If you still believe "they are too strong", you need to open your eyes to how effective a few have been who were simply willing to say "no" and not get butt hurt by the return potty mo…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 10:36 PM
15

quoting from their site (scary) PLEASE NOTE: It is important that you know that we will at all times give the safety of your partner, children and other members of the family top priority. Services supporting partners and children will be helping us assess whether changes in your behavior and relationships are helping them to feel safer, consequently risk assessment will be an ongoing process as well.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:13 AM
1

Did feminists pay the majority of support for your "Masculinities" conf? or Did non-feminist men pay a majority of support for your "Masculinities" conf? Betting Sheryl paid most of it.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 04:38 AM
1

Useful if you can provide a cite to the STOP regulation about this provision.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:33 PM
2

Excellent lecture is a deep dive into current issues mostly caused by a feminist Office of Civil Rights at Dept of Education. You will get a mature understanding in which questions by protesters actually help Johnson frame.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:50 PM
2

This dust up is about authority and how factions get to wield it over others on ideology. It is not about the details or the personalities. Feminism got complicated, and that presents a flaw in how power is transmitted. This leads to oddities like the wage gap myth which maintained in spite of the facts purely as an artifact of internal politics. Factions may give loopy logic to justify their position, but they must also defend their authority. What is exposed when that is challenged? Well obvio…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 05:22 PM
1

I am impressed that 1) anyone is thinking about such things, 2) anyone is brave enough to talk openly about improving tactics. The sweet spot is the effectiveness per the amount of effort required. Don't overlook massive quantities of interested people with little time -- they might vote.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:43 PM
1

Their numbers are low. In the US just the lost income alone for associated dropouts is $500 Billion annually. Existential for those kids, but the amazing thing is how much long term damage is done by relatively small financial gain ($50B) of the greedy people hanging on to CPS and family courts. It may be kids for cash for them, but it makes a really decrepit society.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 08:18 PM
5

Is he pretending to be a journalist?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:01 AM
1

Very nice. A deft repudiation of a shoddy study. It would be even more memorable had it connected the authors to feminist advocacy, but it was top polite.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:10 PM
3

The important question seems to be, "Why did Harvard cave?"
/r/MensRights03/01/15 12:34 AM
1

As soon as you entertain accusations years later, you have entered the realm of delusions. There is no exit.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:23 PM
1

Please note feminists were completely free to coordinate mass response and have all their supporting SJWs vote to ban "bossy." Only 3% of the Time Poll responders chose "bossy". Last year HuffPost poll showed less that 20% support feminism and other polls showed less support. This poll may mean actual support for feminist ideas could be as low as 3%. Yes, feminists are entrenched in media, government, games and atheism, but they are in fact few. A very tiny action can rebalance their influence, …
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:38 PM
3

If umich published them, then you have the right to ask for their supporting material. If the state cannot support and you are a student, think lawsuit.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:27 AM
2

WHERE IS THE PROOF? I cannot find anything that verifies this imgur claim which is like tumblr -- just junk. Show me a Court order or give up faking like Winetta.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:22 AM
1

Very successful online advertising agency shows off how to get attention in a gender sensitive world. Besides what advertiser doesn't want cheaper service like what you can get from hiring cheap women, except what advertisers really want is brilliant placement, and what was more brilliant than pulling off that ruse?
/r/MensRights25/09/14 05:05 PM
0

Of course comments turned off... This another journalist giving wrong and dangerous information, because he only accepts feminist propaganda. Specifically the feminist idea that only men are violent and crude, is wrong today, yesterday and throughout history. http://domesticviolenceresearch.org
/r/MensRights24/09/14 07:44 PM
1

The power of the boycott is good, but there has to be a more useful form. Also look at advertisers more than writers.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:44 PM
2

This is the feminist media. Absolutely nothing humane about them.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 07:38 PM
6

congrats all 7 who have written about feminist hate, and congrats to Marcotte for proving it.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 07:32 PM
2

So throwing non-parents back in, it looks like women are involved in 74% of all US child abuse, yes?
/r/MensRights04/09/14 08:31 PM
1

The only appropriate response is to threaten to dox you while you are on the pyre with the other faggots. homey, eh?
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:48 PM
2

Good that Chronicle could use this headline, although the article is more caution than assertion. However the comments justify that caution because while there is awareness of the young men's side, there is lack of attention that prevents retaining a fact two comments later. Frightening to pull a jury from such.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:36 PM
1

Yup, ill defined, inaccurate, from a biased source, etc. However even more important to know is that the Federal govt particualrly the current Administration through the Dept of Ed. are mandating compliance to some crazy "social justice" by threatening universities with fines of 1 % of Fed funds received. Universities and faculties are scared of disruption. You can clearly see how crazy are the Feds and the Administration because they are willing to disrupt the entire American research as well a…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 09:46 PM
6

Ironic given that most HS dropouts are missing a parent, the one feminism hates.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:26 AM
2

The one thing I would argue with you about is that you missed the main point. Feminism kills freedom. You are correct that a historically great discussion is just now starting. If I may direct you, the center of that is now here http://avoiceformen.com One factual correction: fewer than 20% of women support feminism. Please don't exaggerate the problem. Finally, the biggest damage is feminism in govt service and policy. That is everywhere, so there is need for some large scale organizing and coo…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 02:39 PM
0

Feminism is DANGEROUS in govt and in commerce. Get them OUT.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:11 PM
1

I don't see it happening, but this should be important to us as BIG clues on fem and MRA influence on politics and politicians. The point illustrated in this article is that Clinton will not support equality in general, and I believe that is because she will fem it up and make it particular to a fem definition of equality, i.e. oppression.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:05 PM
1

will rape culture advocates respond?
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:46 PM
1

So if this were true: 1) would legislators be trying to protect children by ensuring custody with dad, or 2) break that protective connection in order to get more child sex for pervert politicians?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:55 AM
1

Comparing the young T with the young Stokely is not approved, but for both, white women had the police at the ready, and for both, it makes it difficult to raise young brothers.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:32 AM
1

Volunteers make a society great. Remember it was a volunteer army that set Americans free from King George.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 04:21 PM
2

SUPER This will be the basis for great action
/r/MensRights01/07/14 08:43 PM
1

Loved the affirmation that Now is still a sour puss secret society.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 06:15 PM
6

Last Saturday Warren Farrell gave vision for action in 10 parts. Money and people resources should be coordinated and measured according that vision. For each of those the labor is 99% volunteer. Few of those folks will come with skills that fit, or that can be moved, but great things can happen with motivation, training, coordination, and measurement of effort and results. So you spend money on what turns people from just chaotic to strategically driven. And don't spend money on one area or one…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:02 PM
3

Daddy Justice? Blake Kleiner?
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:56 AM
1

I hope this means that there is a fractious split in the Stanford Law School rather than they all believe bigotry is acceptable. Given the split, those supporting bigotry are certainly secure. I would sure like to know how the non-bigots there defend the bigot group.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:45 PM
1

YES. That is where the discrimination occurs and made material.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:06 PM
2

Share this !!! 80% are against just this kind of discrimination. Printed in MS is the same as a big KICK ME sign.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 08:45 PM
2

In the second video reformer law professors detail how they were attacked.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:46 PM
1

The news ought to be tracking where psychologists get this loose thinking. Thinking where they can make unsupportable statements, but also create biased hypotheses. This is important because we regular folks need to be able to separate credible from incredible. Until that is possible, psycholgist advice and testamony should be avoided and barred from court. They are a danger to children in that they inject random unreliability into decisions regarding their parenting.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:37 PM
2

The Psych in the Australian policy also remained unapologetic. Like ideologues everywhere, they think that repeating the same lies over and over is a substitute for reality. Robert Franklin followed up with this. https://nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/21723-mcintosh-s-efforts-to-re-write-history-fail
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:58 PM
1

Clearly defines the box dads are supposed to live in according to a self obsessed group.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:28 PM
3

I disagree. Ultimately the settlement of a rights issue is political and to be successful that requires an active coalition. Currently 80% of women do not support feminism or any kind of bigotry, but they are not active. If they were only slightly active, we all win. Katy is the vanguard of women speaking reasonably and firmly. That is all we need and I applaud her speaking up.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:52 PM
0

jeez focus on the 80% minus the 8% who are already anti-fem. So you only have to convince some part of 72% of the population. May I suggest anything more than 12% which is pretty much odds in your favor. So please work with me here, yesterday you thought there was no chance at all. Now if you convince 1 out of 6, you are a winner
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:33 AM
3

The real threat is that feminists still scare politicians. Apparently that is not about numbers which is less than 20% of voters, but the nasty behavior. It is one huge reason state and county child policy is so screwed up in CPS and family court. I hope someone will ask Fiamengo what she knows about the effect on politicians. If it is nothing more than what was done to her at Queens and UO, then maybe we should be talking about the secret of how some politicians have bought them off. That discu…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter