eurydice666 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical? So we go back to, this who are more varied are less similar to npcs than those with fewer differences. Not going to lie, I don’t think I can understand it when you haven’t even written an actual sentence, fix your typos? I’ll try deciphering what you are trying to say here though. What do you mean by those “who are more varied”, with what? Do you mean a more varied iq? And what do you mean by differences? The only difference we have been discussing and that you have evidence of is iq. I don’t kn…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/20 11:27 PM
1	Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical? Jesus Christ.....short answer, no. How can you argue that their personalities are more varied but they are also more likely to be similar? Long answer: Again.... iq=/= personality traits How are they more similar than men then? Do you understand not all quantitative and qualitative distributions are based on a bell curve and can’t be separated tangibly by gender? I certainly agree that women are more likely to have similar iqs than men (although the bell curve difference is not as drastic as you…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/20 11:19 PM
1	Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical? The variability you refer to is iq, hence why I asked if personality traits and interests are based on iq, you claimed you weren’t too sure. So no. You keep missing the key word there, yes they tend to have a more similar iq, and yes they have a less variable iq, but you haven’t managed to link that iq similarity to other similarities in personality traits and interests. Do you understand that now?	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/20 11:08 PM
1	Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical? Because male iq varies much more and women's iq is all bunched together towards the average. This is why they are npcs. Except here it is, in your own words.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/20 10:00 PM
1	Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical? Actually, you were saying that because women’s iq has a smaller range than male iq, they are more similar as people, suggesting that iq causes similar personality traits and interests. Hence they tend to be NPCs. I genuinely have no idea why you think high iq people aren’t watching nascar, though. Have you never noticed that gifted kids can have quite autistic interests, especially in automobiles?	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/20 09:26 PM
1	Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical? I couldn’t personally say, it’s not my theory... What about the mid range? Considering that encompasses most people, do they have similar interests and personality traits to each other? And is that determined by iq?	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/20 08:55 PM
1	Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical? Is iq a determinant in personality traits and interests?	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/20 03:53 PM
7	Wouldn't you just end up with dead-beadrooms, if you force women into relationships with unattractive men Surely you can negotiate male attraction too then by wearing makeup etc...it works in the same way as the lambo As if a lambo is even a realistic way to negotiate attraction and not only available to a small subset of successful males you cannot STOP being ugly Come on	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/10/19 07:15 AM
4	If traditional gender roles were so good for women, how come it is almost exclusively women who want to abandon them in favor of equality, while it is mainly men who support them? Antidepressants are often used to repress menopause symptoms (hot/cold flashes etc)	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/09/19 03:26 PM
1	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? Sorry, but...where? mind-body dualism metaphor What the fuck are you on about	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/19 04:51 PM
1	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? Mate I literally never argued it didn’t in the first place...this is what I have been trying to explain to you LMAO. I literally just took a quote from a previous comment I wrote that you were arguing with???? Bro you are insane.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/19 04:32 PM
1	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? Your posts depend on the completely fictitious superpower of a human organ to perform a complex function without the brain's supervision and control. This is how I know you read zilch of what I wrote. Lmfao What part of “The brain doesn’t lubricate babe....the vagina does in response to a a stimulus from the brain” are you struggling with, exactly?	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/19 04:25 PM
1	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? Sorry but what exactly are you saying nope to? I don’t think you understand what I wrote. It’s all scientifically correct. I say myself the brain sends a stimulus so that the vagina lubricates. If you remove the vagina, there would also be nothing to lubricate so I’m not sure what exactly you are trying to argue with the “if you remove the brain” garbage. You have strayed so far from the original argument...just any attempt to get something right. Actually read what I wrote next time.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/19 11:38 AM
1	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? What present information do you even have? Sorry you edited this since I responded. So my question might be confusing now if you don’t remember. Maybe asking for your “circumstantial evidence” will make more sense. In the end hypothesising is all well and good. But what you said was BEFORE you make a conclusion, you want to see evidence. You see no evidence, and yet still argue STRONGLY in favour of a particular conclusion. Just admit your bias and stop pretending you care so much about evidence…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/19 09:33 AM
1	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? You should know that it's their brain telling itself that they are undergoing intercourse and lubricating accordingly. The brain is part of the body, first of all. But also the brain is not the only player involved, the part of the body stimulated literally detects the stimulus and sends the impulse to the brain to decide what to do. The brain doesn’t lubricate babe....the vagina does in response to a a stimulus from the brain. The brain tells the vagina to do that via positive feedback mechanis…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/19 08:45 AM
1	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? STILL doesn’t mean someone is mentally attracted to a trait. Women often get wet during rape. It’s their body realising they are undergoing intercourse and making it physically safe for it to proceed by minimising injury risk. Nothing erotic about it. Your unconscious mind isn’t so based on feelings and emotions but more on biological pragmatism.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/09/19 08:16 PM
1	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? say you need evidence for a conclusion proceed to make a conclusion without evidence Aight	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/09/19 08:13 PM
1	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? You can’t tell the difference between physical arousal and mental attraction? Have you never had a random boner pop up for no reason?	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/09/19 12:18 AM
1	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? Do you even read what I write? Or anything in this thread? I haven’t made any conclusion about who is more proficient at recognising what traits attract them. I’m trying to explain to you knowing when you have a boner/female equivalent is not the the same as knowing the trait that caused arousal or attraction. Does this make sense to you? Also it’s killing me you say “to me, I want to see evidence before we conclude that women or men know or don't know at any level” and then say right after “I w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/09/19 08:24 PM
1	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? Yes but it’s knowing what is causing those symptoms. That’s the difference.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/09/19 07:04 PM
2	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? The description is there to elaborate on the title topic, maybe read that too next time. I was also referring to the comment you replied to, specifically, the one you quoted. Also you are not at all on topic anyway, knowing and not knowing what you are attracted to is different to knowing and not knowing when you exhibit physical arousal symptoms.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/09/19 03:42 PM
2	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? Or that they are lying, lol. I’ve read this in a study where women displayed physical arousal to a video of monkeys having sex, of course they won’t admit it if their body becomes aroused. But again, what you are discussing is entirely off topic and doesn’t make sense to what the person you replied to was talking about.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/09/19 12:21 PM
2	Do women have a blindspot when it comes to what they are attracted to? This isn’t what’s being discussed. It’s the difference between what you think is drawing your attention and what actually is. I.e. subconscious trait recognition like pheromones etc.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/09/19 10:59 AM
13	The Woman Who Teaches You How to Bag a Billionaire Woman have been part of the workforce since ancient times. I wouldn’t call it fairly new...	/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen	27/01/19 09:57 PM
1	[discussion] Danny DeVito is reportedly very successful with women Tell that to all the female teachers banging their underage students.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/01/19 09:49 AM
3	[discussion] Danny DeVito is reportedly very successful with women Lol. At least I’m not attracted to 14 year olds, eh?	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/01/19 07:32 PM
2	[discussion] Danny DeVito is reportedly very successful with women Yeah. I know minor is a legal term. It’s why I take issue with the original commenter in its use. Comments edited due to case of mistaken identity.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/01/19 05:08 PM
2	[discussion] Danny DeVito is reportedly very successful with women Yeah, then why did you attempt to define minors biologically if it means nothing? The two subjects don’t even relate.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/01/19 04:58 PM
5	[discussion] Danny DeVito is reportedly very successful with women I don’t think you know what minor means.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/01/19 03:47 PM
1	Exactly who are you waiting for to invent "toxic femininity?" Then why bother describing such a term and only assigning it to a specific group?	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/01/19 12:15 AM
1	Exactly who are you waiting for to invent "toxic femininity?" Fair enough. Do you also think only feminists can experience toxic femininity? I would have thought it was anyone who was unable to take responsibility for their actions etc.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/01/19 10:57 PM
1	Exactly who are you waiting for to invent "toxic femininity?" Do you think some people who are ethnic minority’s experience the same “pathological victimhood”? I love this term by the way, I don’t think either male or female toxicity exists but if it was going to be anything, it would be that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/01/19 10:41 PM
17	Q4W: How do you feel about TRP's claim that women only love conditionally? From some studies on spouse abandonment during illness: Their study consisted of collecting data on 515 patients who received a diagnosis of brain tumors or multiple sclerosis from 2001 through 2006. Women in the study who were told they had a serious illness were seven times as likely to become separated or divorced as men with similar health problems, according to the report published in the journal Cancer. When the men became ill, only 3 percent experienced the end of a marriage, but among wo…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/01/19 04:05 PM
2	Discussion: French author (who is about to turn 50) tells BBC "women over 50 are too old to love" To be fair, most studies in those fields are actually pretty useless. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/27/study-delivers-bleak-verdict-on-validity-of-psychology-experiment-results https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454055/ psychological phenomena vary across time, situations and persons. The human mind is unreproducible from one situation to another. Psychological phenomena are not particles that can decisively be tested and discovered. There are onl…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/01/19 11:08 AM
3	Would you rather marry a man who’s a virgin, or a man who’s had over 30 sexual partners? Men and women who only slept with their (future) spouse prior to marriage reported higher marital quality than those who had other sexual partners as well. Further, for women, having had fewer sexual partners before marriage was also related to higher marital quality. From here. So it seems as though it is relevant to men too, but perhaps not as much as women?	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/12/18 06:21 PM
3	Would you rather marry a man who’s a virgin, or a man who’s had over 30 sexual partners? Not everyone wants the same things you want.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/12/18 06:07 PM
5	Would you rather marry a man who’s a virgin, or a man who’s had over 30 sexual partners? Yeah insecurity is definitely a part of it. And, marriages are less likely to result in divorce if you both have less sexual partners, I wonder why, though. Just more likely to be committed to being with one person?	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/12/18 06:03 PM
19	Would you rather marry a man who’s a virgin, or a man who’s had over 30 sexual partners? Virgin. But I wouldn’t want to marry without having sex together first. My boyfriend was a virgin (as was I) when we got together. I just prefer someone who places more consideration into who they sleep with. Edit to add: I’m under 20. So this is maybe more reasonable for someone my age. (I’m not interested in older men.)	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/12/18 04:33 PM
2	What's the deal with cunnilingus? Wouldn’t happen if people used protection for oral/didn’t perform intimate acts with casual or multiple partners.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/12/18 02:33 PM
1	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. You’re anti-abortion? Are you also anti-paper abortion then? You did point out that that’s how the logic follows. ETA: I actually think signing a written contract of sorts before having sex where the father can describe his intentions in the case of pregnancy is fine. It allows women and men to be on the same page and think about the consequences. I just think it is wrong after there is a pregnancy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/11/18 09:40 PM
1	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. I’m against abortions so...yup, that’s how it works. Afraid you are barking up the wrong tree lol Despite this I still can clearly see the difference between aborting a FETUS and “aborting” a CHILD.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/11/18 09:41 PM
2	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. No. It makes me uncomfortable that someone would like to not care for their own children. And lol they can’t withdraw their consent to impregnate are you living in the real world? You give “”””consent”””” to impregnate once you stick your dick in the correct reproductive organs	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/11/18 10:40 AM
2	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. As I said, a basic income would be a welfare system. Why should people get money they didn’t work as hard for? He expanded the window of what seems politically viable. That's significant, because it leads to the viability of other radical ideas...it generally makes people's thinking more flexible. "Well we've already had someone with no political experience be president, why not a populist state senator from West Virginia?" This is waffle. No ones gonna tax the rich because the rich are mainly n…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 10:19 PM
2	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. Completely. But I'm not as optimistic. They've been at this for over a decade. Maybe some medical advancements just aren't possible. It has literally been invented. People just didn’t like it because it had side effects, that are surprisingly similar to the female pill, anyway... What? I never said anything about genius. Being successful and good at your job typically requires a strong education, and people have to work hard in school to get good qualifications. Doctors and lawyers in general kn…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 10:15 PM
3	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. A minimum basic incomes exists. Of course, it’s decided by the market. What happens to those who cannot work full time due to children, but also can not afford a nursery? The answer to everything is not “upping the wage minimum”, because it’s not how the economy works. Because that would require subsidising wages, (a safety net...a....welfare system, if you will). You know Trump won’t tax the rich, right? That Swedish group never actually implemented the bill due to overwhelming negative respons…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 10:07 PM
3	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. Proud democratic socialist You said earlier to abolish welfare? What? Are you having an identity crisis? Sweden is in a far better position to propose financial abortions as the state picks up the tab due to the crazy taxes over there. (I’ve never heard anything about this though, so do you have sources?)	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 09:50 PM
2	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. You said dealing with a sluts mistake. It’s pretty implied that you didn’t think it would be a mans mistake, (although it’s the mans fault you would have to pay for it as it is his decision to have the financial abortion). Men also have complete control over their nut, lol, it is their mistake and only theirs.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 09:47 PM
2	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. I’m not going to open the can of worms with your response to my rhetorical questions. (But may I ask you, would you be happy having a less qualified, less educated doctor perform life-risking surgery but was chosen simply because his parents were poor?). It is very close to being released, I think you can hang in for a few years. But medical advancements will also be better than financial abortions, as it solves the root cause and doesn’t damage any kids lives. Would you not agree?	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 09:45 PM
2	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. You believe in equality of outcome? Do you also believe in employment quotas for minorities? “Equal wage” for women? Really didn’t have you nailed as a dribbling left winger lmaooo. As soon as the male birth control pill comes out, you can drop this stupid argument and get on with your life.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 09:38 PM
4	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. LOL did you even read your own article, it says: A 2013 study that found that the idea that condoms somehow reduce the pleasure of sex is a myth. The Journal of Sexual Medicine surveyed a few thousand adults age 18 to 59 and found that safe sex was rated as pleasurably as unsafe sex. Your whole argument is based off that you want more sensation during sex by not using condoms. According to your article, this isn’t true. Enjoy! And, the study that women also reject the use of condoms during sex w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 09:34 PM
3	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. How many times do people have to tell you. The premise of your argument is that because women have a birth control pill, you should have paper abortions. Birth control pill DOES NOT equal paper abortion, so what you are proposing has an incorrect premise, and therefore loses validity. It’s like saying dogs have puppies, so I want a cup of tea! Even a real abortion does not equal a paper abortion.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 09:20 PM
2	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. ...yes? I mean about how there isn’t a male equivalent to that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 09:04 PM
3	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. Addressed; did you read what I wrote? Yes, it’s a joke fam because of your ridiculously fallacious reasoning. You do realise condoms are the only protection against STDs? Plus, not using a condom does NOT feel more pleasurable for women, lol. I say this because you seem to lack basic sex education. The right to not do the bare minimum for your kids will not be granted because you want more feelz during sex lmao. I'm not a scientist. Lol, I wasn’t asking you to invent one, but simply advocate for…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 09:01 PM
4	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. Oh so the guy can’t make mistakes? Yeah guys never irresponsibly go raw 🤔 always the slutty wamens fault	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 02:12 PM
4	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. Yeah...so the female birth control pill is not equivalent to the paper abortion either, which is what OP is arguing. If he wanted to complain about not being able to back out of caring for his child, then he should have made a post about women being allowed abortions. (Which I still don’t believe to be an equivalent anyway.)	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 01:36 PM
10	Thanks, birth control day spawned a series of tweets by women espousing why they're thankful for birth control. These exact same reasons justify enabling men to terminate paternal rights and support obligations (also known as "male abortion" or "paper abortion") CMV. Lol, this man doesn’t know what a condom is. Also, why are you advocating for a “paper abortion” system and not just the male birth control pill to be available to the masses? That would be the equivalent to the female birth control pill. And, single mothers are statistically producing the least well balanced and least well off children. Financial abortions would only vastly exacerbate this. We do not want generations of fucked up kids. Men need to play a role in the lives of their children. It’…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/18 10:59 AM
1	I actually don't know where to talk about this so I'll try here. How dangerous is it as a man to help women and children these days? I think it’s on you to prove the point you’re making. Just admit you didn’t come here to have your view challenged but also have no way of proving your point, not even anecdotally. You sound like you need a therapist if you really think people are out to get you this much.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/11/18 02:21 PM
1	I actually don't know where to talk about this so I'll try here. How dangerous is it as a man to help women and children these days? Where would this be, and what did the men do to be mistaken for a pedophile? Again, send an actual case. That also doesn’t support your point that you will end up in jail or on the sex offenders register.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/11/18 01:38 PM
1	I actually don't know where to talk about this so I'll try here. How dangerous is it as a man to help women and children these days? It would convince me that there is really something wrong with the state of the world when we can get in trouble for helping others. (I am aware this happens in China) Go ahead and do so.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/11/18 12:31 PM
1	I actually don't know where to talk about this so I'll try here. How dangerous is it as a man to help women and children these days? Surely women would also be helped less, then? So it’s bad for them too.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/11/18 10:44 AM
1	I actually don't know where to talk about this so I'll try here. How dangerous is it as a man to help women and children these days? In what case would doing the right thing involve these consequences lmao? Please send a real life case of any of these things happening, especially in a case where you helped a child out of a dangerous situation or prevented a woman from getting abused. And yes, calling the police instead of jumping in to stop a woman getting assaulted is absolutely fine to do and better than turning away from the situation. That’s the right thing to do and has the least amount of physical harm involved.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/11/18 10:38 AM
39	Everything is about sex, except sex. Sex is about power. Oscar Wilde did make it popular, lol what.	/r/MarriedRedPill	21/11/18 01:47 PM
6	CMV: Its okay to use women for sex. According to the post, there was no agreement to a NSA. He knows she has feelings and possibly wants more. This is a different situation to the one you are talking about. Of course there is nothing wrong with “no strings attached” sex if both parties consented to this, if we are talking in terms of public perception and personal morals.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/18 09:28 AM
5	CMV: Its okay to use women for sex. Just because it is something you decide to do doesn’t mean it is “okay”. Like it is still a dick move to lie and mislead someone you are close with, but there will most likely be few consequences other than some hurt feelings. The point is yeah, you CAN do it, but if you have a moral compass or even just a sense of empathy, you are probably gonna feel bad about mistreating someone who didn’t really deserve it, or at the very least, doing something like that will involve unfavourable backlash.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/18 09:27 AM
1	Ex girlfriend murdered her ex and his wife. Currently being charged. But he committed SEVERAL MORE class AA felonies under the law than she did if your read the article, and their sentences don’t necessarily have to be the same as life imprisonment without parole is simply the upper limit, actual sentences vary. Plus, neither have even been sentenced yet so we shall have to see what both of them receive. No I don’t think it’s a women hate sub. I’m female and I’m not offended by it at all, just think the post is a poor fit so I disagreed with your argument.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/11/18 05:55 PM
1	Ex girlfriend murdered her ex and his wife. Currently being charged. Well yes and she was arrested for conspiracy lol? What’s your point? It is still irrelevant to the fact that he went ahead and did it, he wasn’t under mind control!!!! Because I disagreed with it, what’s your end game of refuting the other guys point? She hasn’t been sentenced to 10 years. She hasn’t been sentenced to anything yet, where are you getting your information from?	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/11/18 05:45 PM
1	Ex girlfriend murdered her ex and his wife. Currently being charged. That’s irrelevant, he still went and intentionally killed two people? What, does his moral compass rely on his girlfriends decisions? I never said that it was a hate women sub, but this post doesn’t even fit on this sub it’s just lame. I agree that she should, she was just as intentionally conspiring to commit murder as he was.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/11/18 05:35 PM
1	Ex girlfriend murdered her ex and his wife. Currently being charged. Because it has nothing to do with a pussy pass being denied? And everyone seems to be ignoring the fact that the boyfriend is the one that literally went and killed them, which is JUST as bad, if not worse.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/11/18 05:30 PM
1	Am I saying something that doesn’t make sense they act like I’m some asshole? Then why mention rape and murder, which are illegal acts, as if it is comparable. You can word it how you like, for example, enforcing a father to take on the role of doing the bare minimum to support his offspring. This depends on your political stance. If no fathers contributed to the lives of their children, their would be bedlam.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/18 10:26 AM
1	Am I saying something that doesn’t make sense they act like I’m some asshole? Oh yeah because having someone’s kid is the same as getting raped or murdered. I’m not trying to decriminalise a woman impregnating herself when the man does not consent to it, I’m pointing out that that is the step you can take if you are that concerned of it happening.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/18 08:36 AM
2	Am I saying something that doesn’t make sense they act like I’m some asshole? Lol	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/10/18 07:58 PM
2	Am I saying something that doesn’t make sense they act like I’m some asshole? Lol	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/10/18 06:05 PM
5	Am I saying something that doesn’t make sense they act like I’m some asshole? https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/teens/ask-experts/how-often-do-condoms-break The odds of a condom breaking are really small if you’re using them correctly Clearly you are doing something wrong if it happens THAT often to you. Have you considered using a spermicide just in case. Where the hell did I say flush them down the toilet lol? Not what I was saying at all. I said dispose of them, as in the man should take care of it himself and not leave it lying around anywhere. You seem incredib…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/10/18 05:26 PM
2	Am I saying something that doesn’t make sense they act like I’m some asshole? Um no, but being told how to carefully dispose of used condoms would. And highlighting abusive natures in both men and women and suggesting potential red flags would help too. If used properly a condom would not break. If they are not expired, proper lubrication is used and they are of a good quality I am pretty sure the risk is almost zero. And if it does break, use back up protection. The unlikelihood of this happening, the women being in her fertility window, and the woman deciding she wants …	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/10/18 05:01 PM
3	Am I saying something that doesn’t make sense they act like I’m some asshole? Please explain how committing a sexual crime is the same as inadvertently being knocked up? You do realise the creation of a child is a biological process in which both people involved are actively doing something that could lead to a baby, and raping someone is the actions of ONE person and one person only, and is by definition unwanted and unplanned by the victim. If she had said she wanted sex but secretly didn’t, that would be a viable analogy, but in that situation she should have just said…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/10/18 02:07 PM
5	Am I saying something that doesn’t make sense they act like I’m some asshole? Honestly if you don’t trust your partner to not do these things, don’t sleep with her. Pretty simple. If a woman is that psycho there are signs. Or you could just do what NBA players are advised to do if you’re that paranoid.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/10/18 01:59 PM
3	Am I saying something that doesn’t make sense they act like I’m some asshole? Unfortunately, biology doesn’t care whether you consent to producing a child. You do realise consent only applies to the actions of humans, yes? A child is a consequence of consenting to sex, not an action. In fact, keeping a child is very much a non-action. Your argument that a man has a choice to decide how his DNA is used falls short when you realise that 50% of the fetus is also of the mother. We then reach a standoff, if the father would like to destroy the DNA (the fetus) but the mother wo…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/10/18 01:01 AM
5	Am I saying something that doesn’t make sense they act like I’m some asshole? He willingly gave up DNA in intercourse if the sex was consensual. What, are we supposed to be suing children for genetic identity theft?	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/10/18 12:01 AM
2	Am I saying something that doesn’t make sense they act like I’m some asshole? The man also decides which women he has sex with, he is equally responsible in the outcome of a pregnancy as he too made the decision to procreate. Therefore he is clearly also liable if the obvious outcome of a pregnancy occurs. (Unless in the case of rape).	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/10/18 11:58 PM
1	Tell Congress: We must clone this woman. Now. Interesting. Come to think of it, my dad's quite strict on men paying for meals and all the chivalrous stuff, yet his wife (my mum) is a business women working pretty equal to what he earns and is pretty independent. They are an odd inbetween generation I think, but as time goes by I reckon the practice will be a forgotten tradition on the whole.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/18 02:01 PM
1	Tell Congress: We must clone this woman. Now. It's just so weirdly traditional, it made sense when women weren't working jobs like men do. But now a lot of us do, what is it trying to prove?	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/18 01:19 PM
1	Tell Congress: We must clone this woman. Now. Lol is it really weird for women to pay? Me and my boyfriend take it in turns. I swear this is normal?	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/18 12:27 PM
1	#Believewomen is wrong Then perhaps you have issues empathising.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/18 07:56 AM
1	#Believewomen is wrong Not because it's inconvenient, though, because its an expensive process and traumatic to dwell on that could result in a fruitless process. Don't simplify it to "oh well I can't be bothered".	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/18 07:54 AM
1	#Believewomen is wrong What? You think people don't report traumatic and hard to prove crimes because its inconvenient?	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/18 07:44 AM
2	#Believewomen is wrong That's a very good way to put it. Unfortunately it seems that sometimes explaining or pointing out situations that come across as dangerous and how to avoid them are considered victim blaming. If only there was a way to say, it still isn't your fault if something happens, but protect yourself!	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/10/18 07:33 PM
2	#Believewomen is wrong Exactly. Outside of that, people can believe what they want.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/10/18 06:11 PM
1	#Believewomen is wrong Maybe it's hard for me to know, but it would definitely be one of my first thoughts to at the very least get it reported. Mainly because I would be scared of not being believed if I left it too late, and to get whoever did it in jail.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/10/18 04:38 PM
10	#Believewomen is wrong Hopefully the new culture of belief will encourage women to come forward straight away if they were legitimately raped. Everyone deserves due process in the legal system.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/10/18 02:28 PM
1	Message to all incels: never stop asking girls out My boyfriend does have issues with his self esteem, yes. I do what I can to support him. I mean why wouldn't we? We have nothing to lose. Short women and tall women are the same anyways. Lol no they both had severe autism, one said himself he only loved chickens and shall marry one. One of his friends wad actually an extremely atttactive girl and all he would ever talk about with her was kpop. The other one liked trains lol. But I do know that most women wouldn't date them, but why would they lo…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/10/18 09:30 AM
1	Message to all incels: never stop asking girls out Yeah thought so after I replied dw lol. And no I didn't imply it. Yes I do, I knew a few when I was at school but none of them were very interested in sexual relationships tbh. A guy who recently asked me out was 5'4 and pretty unattractive. I was kinda surprised he went for someone very much noticeably taller than him tbh. Wouldn't say he was quite incel though because he was a really chill guy and we get on. But yeah I am just saying i have never felt insulted when someone asked me out, occasi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/10/18 11:39 PM
1	Message to all incels: never stop asking girls out Nope. Just know my boyfriend wouldn't be comfortable with me talking to guys who I had met because they asked me out. I'm pretty average in my opinion but okay.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/10/18 11:23 PM
1	Message to all incels: never stop asking girls out Nope and nope. Nice assumptions. Never said i was attracted to them anyway, just that I would happily get to know them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/10/18 11:21 PM
1	Message to all incels: never stop asking girls out Lol actually it just boosts our esteem tbh, I enjoy getting asked out, but I don't enjoy rejecting them beacuse I get worried that it will cement their often unwarranted issues with their appearances etc. I would try to get to know them better but I have a boyfriend so no.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/10/18 11:07 PM
16	CMV: Rad Feminism Has Succeeded In Doing Serious Damage To The Minds Of Women And Gender Relations In my head I have an image of the threat you are describing, and I am aware he exists and thus take precautions to prevent coming across him (not alone at night, look out for red flags, harassing behaviour etc). However, every male in my life is not like this. I have never truly come across this type of man close enough in real life, so therefore I don't feel the need to be scared of every man, but simply be aware he could exist. Thats very different to being irrationally scared of every man. I …	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/09/18 09:26 PM