TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

everybodyluvzwaymond Archive

View 0 posts and 145 comments by everybodyluvzwaymond on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

Feminists and misandrists are pretty much the same
/r/EverydayMisandry27/09/25 09:26 PM
10

Yup it’s par for the course. I went to a “good” school and there was much of this garbage. It’s straight up indoctrination outside of hard sciences.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 07:19 AM
3

TLDR: she acknowledges feminism wants to have their cake and eat it and how this has been destructive. She asks the movement what is their intent now. She didn’t get as sucked in like other women and wishes to investigate what is appealing to women on social media adopting elements of ideology. She believes the feminism to be destructive. She asks feminist what they want. She acknowledges that feminists and women essentially want to have their cake and eat it. They want a la carte “equality”, wh…
/r/MensRights07/09/25 06:59 AM
2

As you should. There are a lot of grifters, but I do think it’s important that women are saying these things and other women hear them. I stumbled on Kevin Samuels and Karen Straughan videos and it really came together. A lot of women are ruining their lives and their family because they chase their feelings and money. If women actually want to be a good wife, have a family and children then need to drop the anti-social agenda in feminist ideology. It’s a real problem. I am a woman and basically…
/r/MensRights07/09/25 06:25 AM
3

The Jada Pinkett Smith defense
/r/MensRights06/09/25 11:20 PM
2

What were the red flags you saw early on?
/r/Divorce_Men19/08/25 11:06 PM
41

It’s clear it’s more subversion out of some AWFL dominated marketing and media departments. More Bud Light-esque stuff
/r/MensRights19/08/25 08:53 AM
6

She and Karen helped me articulate what I saw as problems with that movement and their rhetoric as a young woman. I saw how anti-social and self-serving this kind of buffet style feminism was, but I couldn’t put my finger on its broader implications at the time.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 07:39 PM
5

Agreed and this current wave of feminist rhetoric is much more anti-social, anti-family, accessible to the mainstream and younger girls. It’s More hostile than my generation of feminist talking points. Women essentially are anti-social contract using feminism to opt out of their obligations (but still wishing to reap the rewards of the society nonetheless). Be vigilant and filter out the feminists, but don’t look too deeply into those echo chambers.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 07:00 PM
4

They have been for some time
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/25 06:50 PM
24

Feminist leaning women have become much more anti-social and hostile towards their own societies. This undermines stability. More men and women need to wake up to this. We have let our society become too feminized especially by these ideological feminists in government, media, law, and education who want the benefits of society built by people doing dirty jobs with none of the tradeoffs. They want to more self-important women to “compete” with the 1% of men and take from the cookie jar and don’t…
/r/MensRights27/07/25 06:02 PM
10

Women do not want equality in any true sense. Maybe a few who work in the trenches with men or have sons who have been fucked by the system, but most want the benefits of modern society without any of the tradeoffs. We have been told by spoiled activists, greedy girlbosses, and Sex and The City that we can “have it all” and many still believe it or blame men when no one very obviously cannot have their cake and eat it.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 05:31 PM
50

They are more pragmatic and less stupidly sentimental and less prone to suicidal empathy than the west. They saw the problems of changing gender roles and are trying to correct them.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 04:46 AM
9

The Obamas ushered in and promoted the nonsense we see today. Not even a year ago, he was out scolding grown men for not voting for Kamala who was a clear DEI hire (I’m black and that’s what she was). He should be apologizing to Americans he duped and not just scolding for clout.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 03:23 AM
12

The commenter is exactly the danger of anti-social entitled feminist ideology that is now rampant in education, media, business and government. Girls and Women learn “I want, I deserve, I’m powerful, I’m oppressed”, but little about their obligations to their family, their neighbors, their country or society. These women who are some of the most privileged people on the planet become teachers, work in HR, and corporate and bring their spite and misguided apex fallacies in to indoctrinate the nex…
/r/MensRights12/06/25 09:48 AM
1

Yikes 😬
/r/EverydayMisandry27/05/25 02:30 PM
1

This is the correct answer.
/r/Divorce_Men24/05/25 07:16 AM
1

Why target only men? Not to confine taxing, but Why not tax women who do not have children or get into a relationship?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:37 AM
–

Attention. She still wants to feel wanted and validated by you. There are lots of stories like yours on the Strong Successful Male channel
/r/Divorce_Men19/05/25 12:24 PM
19

This is 100% happening and alienating women from men. I am a woman who was exposed to this as a student and it took time to recover from. At the time I pushed back, but it can affect your grades and there are various chokepoints it can get you: gender/sex, dating (gender war stuff), spirituality via woo woo nonsense, sexuality, race/ethnicity, geopolitics/politics and the arts. It won’t be called those things, but it is straight up indoctrination. Outside of hard STEM, you are taught resentment …
/r/MensRights15/05/25 08:03 AM
21

I don't see how it is sustainable either. The system rewarding women with quotas and initiatives particularly in higher skilled fields (like doctors) when they typically do not work as many hours that men would. It's a double whammy. They don't pay into the tax system as much as men do yet lobby to get more workplace positions and power while on the whole women consume more from the system via benefits.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 07:46 PM
6

Exactly. I am a woman and this didn’t sit well with me for that same reason. This woman doesn’t seem to place responsibility on women to understand men at all or marriage (as duty and team effort) at all. Where is a woman’s obligation or responsibility to understand men? Women initiate over 70% of divorces. Why in Gods name would any man signup for that?
/r/MensRights10/05/25 12:53 AM
6

Men have always been disposable, but women at least had obligations and a sense of duty. Feminism told women and men that those obligations needed to go even the ones that were necessary for maintaining their own families they created and social cohesion.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 12:49 AM
7

I watched the video and have mixed feelings. It seems once again women’s emotional centrality is the measuring stick for relationships, now it’s just going the other way. Now men must be more emotionally attuned for the relationship to suit their sensibilities and not upset them. Where is women’s responsibility in understanding men from where they are coming from? What are women’s obligations?
/r/MensRights09/05/25 06:52 AM
8

Men are the majority of the producers. Women, however, are a plurality of voters and vote in-group and so eventually enough will vote for the government to give them stuff and favor them (directly or indirectly). Essentially men need to understand that they are funding women via the government.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 05:16 AM
8

It fits the narrative
/r/MensRights05/05/25 06:38 AM
2

Or, hear me out. The wife gets over herself. If she is willing to turn an observation into a problem, then there is a serious maturity issue with the wife.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/25 01:55 AM
1

It only took two decades for the city center to become majority non-native. It sounds like you guys are 25 years behind the inevitable trend of loose borders. What does the current government proposing to fix the issue?
/r/MensRights28/04/25 12:23 PM
1

I can give examples of what my family members have done. They reconnected with cousins and uncles at family functions or events. They reconnected with past friends from childhood/young adulthood. They attend a regular gym or sport that men regularly meet at and invest time there.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 12:18 PM
2

I am a woman and this is correct. We have been more entitled due to current culture. Women are not aware of this pattern and it must to explained in real time to them and early to hold them accountable. There are women who can and will learn from this, but the higher maintenance she is the less she looks to self-reflect or seek self-improvement FOR their men and the relationship.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 12:05 PM
2

I am a woman and this is correct. I straight up told my male relatives most women are not raised to be wife material and to vet very carefully. IMO, We took community and the family unit for granted. Build a strong and social network independent of your female SO (life long friends, outdoor buddies, and extended family like cousins, uncles etc). Women can offer some support, but avoid women who use therapy speak to guilt trip and henpeck you (see iamapaigeturner on TikTok to see what I’m talking…
/r/MensRights28/04/25 11:42 AM
19

I am a woman and want women accountable for their actions. Why are you soft on female criminality?
/r/MensRights27/04/25 08:33 PM
3

Yes
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 08:29 PM
1

How did it affect your city centers and rural areas? The next step will be even less compatible cultures by the millions in Poland
/r/MensRights27/04/25 07:43 PM
1

I’m sorry you are 20 years behind us then. When the women in your country stop having kids because they no longer raise families and rather collect checks as a girlboss in middle management, the government will import the 3rd world. I’m not kidding. Source: am descendant of 3rd world.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 06:58 PM
6

This is correct
/r/Divorce_Men26/04/25 04:02 AM
4

Yes, Women push for marriage and then initiate 70% of divorces. It’s not a winning strategy.
/r/Divorce_Men25/04/25 11:48 AM
6

I am female and feel the same, but I can’t deny what I am seeing. Without strict guardrails on access, it seems women will eventually use government to collectively lobby for rewards without responsibility. I think all roads lead to this when you allow women the vote and power under the auspices of equality. I’m not sure what to think at this point. Quotas to get women in top positions will only tip the scales for men’s redistribution of resources to women without being obligated to have familie…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:42 AM
4

What is the justification for this? I thought Poland was trying not to emulate the failures of Western Europe and was rejecting a lot of this nonsense.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:26 AM
4

A lot of it is, yes. Like a strange mix of the egotism, tribalism, apex fallacy, pettiness and perpetual daddy issues. The most anti-social elements of feminism have become more mainstream especially as women are having less kids (where their energy can focus) and our society has become less communal. Feminism has become their religion. Basically they want the rewards of the top men (status) AND the most coveted women (desirability) without any of the downsides for either sex. For decades very s…
/r/MensRights19/04/25 04:30 PM
2

It’s sad to watch a nation from across the pond become self-flagellating wusses and destroy itself
/r/MensRights19/04/25 12:50 PM
5

I agree and think feminism was the gateway drug that removed a very important chesterson’s fence. Feminism single-handedly undermined the family as the bedrock of society and country. It’s undermined marriages with divorce laws, broken families and isolated kids , feminized institutions, and legitimized the demoralizing of western culture
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:39 AM
3

Yep the idpol was another red herring and means to evade feminism’s culpability. It was always going to turn into another witch trial.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 03:31 AM
7

This is correct. This was one of the things I observed with feminism. It seemed to be about shedding social responsibility while wanting more social privileges. can’t demand “equality” and then expect your male coworker take out the trash at night, not you.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 01:34 AM
2

When she is comfortable with whichever guy, she will let herself go again
/r/Divorce_Men29/03/25 09:50 AM
3

Welcome to the opportunism fighting and protecting country and its women at all costs produces from the women who don’t even value it
/r/MensRights29/03/25 08:08 AM
2

It’s the same sentiment though. “We want more stuff “rights” and will complain enough to get what we want.” The problem is 170 years ago men actually ran the show/had authority and there were enough material disadvantages to make some requests for rights understandable. This sentiment and tactic no longer changed even when we got everything we demanded (just like the race grifters) without examining the costs: lower wages by doubling the workforce, less social cohesion, and more broken homes by …
/r/MensRights26/03/25 10:46 PM
55

Exactly, controlled opposition
/r/MensRights22/03/25 02:37 PM
9

This Psychologist talks about it. It’s been taken over by women. Most women are liberal and follow the feminist ideology whether they know it or not. It’s the same problem in the publishing industry. Once a certain amount of women are in the profession, it caters to them and their sensibilities.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 04:10 AM
1

Can someone explain to me what’s going on in India?
/r/MensRights13/03/25 04:02 AM
10

“Would an average sized row boat support you without capsizing?”
/r/MensRights12/03/25 06:30 PM
1

What is a woman? 🤷‍♀️
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 03:33 PM
14

This fool thinks their whinging and daddy issues are critical thought. Last I checked, their daddy’s talent is the only reason this useless person gets any attention.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 05:21 AM
3

Agreed. Is Globalism the term you are looking for?
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:44 PM
3

Yes, they still refuse to see this is the logical conclusion of throwing the baby out with the bath water. This is the future without gatekeeping and why the right wing is growing support in their countries. Importing millions from God knows where and treating the country like an AirBnb doesn’t work.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:38 PM
3

They got it right with Megan Boswell and hopefully they get it with her too. 18 is old enough to know you don’t throw babies out of windows. You don’t get to kill your own innocent child because of alleged feelings postpartum.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:15 PM
4

women get benefits from the system, effectively depending on men while they don’t even have to know the name of the men feeding her. that’s the phenomenon of modern women “not needing men” This is 100% correct. What’s sad is too many are straight up unaware about the second and third order consequences. You cannot vote for pizza and ice cream for lunch every day. Someone has to pay the cost of doing business. The math doesn’t math Karen Straughan talks about decreasing sustainability as a result…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 01:43 PM
1

Women and society know the power of male sex drives and weaker in-group favoritism will make this difficult. There are enough men willing to compete directly or indirectly for access to women to outpace increasing female anti-social behaviors. At least for now.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 01:16 PM
11

That is effectively what MeToo and BLM were facilitating- a soft power grab.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 10:51 AM
6

I agree. It flows down from women’s comfort. How much do you conform to what makes women feel comfortable will decide your pole position in our current system
/r/MensRights03/03/25 02:40 PM
3

Correct, society is being socially engineered to install more gynocentric preferences. All you have to do is this: First ask the woman if they believe in equality and when they say “yes”, then ask women this: “if a robber was trying to mug and assault you and your man, should you get in front of your man to protect him or should your man get in front of you to protect you?” Then wait and calmly dismantle it. Right now, woman can say stupid things because life is comfortable. You have to push pas…
/r/MensRights02/03/25 01:20 PM
1

No man without kids should enter that situation. Rewarding single mothers with a relationship is only going to incentivize the monkey branching
/r/MensRights02/03/25 12:33 PM
12

A lot of this “mental load” is more self-inflicted ruminating than women will admit.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 12:55 AM
7

In my opinion, the only way to get women to wake up from this is to get them out of their air-conditioned desk jobs and have them do physical labor that men do. Then remind everyone that women get the opt out of the most dangerous jobs for the most part all while claiming to be victims. This broke me out of the feminist nonsense. Every time I watched my managers assign dirtier jobs to my male coworkers and the cleaner front end jobs to us women, I realized the “equality” feminists were really ta…
/r/MensRights18/02/25 12:34 AM
5

Agreed, all while socially engineering women to undervalue the traits that made women unique in our society for centuries: raising the next generation of children, nurturing the wider family unit, upholding communities and traditions for their families to thrive, etc., as completely beneath them. Feminists have the very sexist notions they claim men have. I don’t think people are disturbed enough by how antisocial this is. Then we use the government and private sector preferential policies to qu…
/r/MensRights18/02/25 12:25 AM
5

Those are the vestiges of the rules and constructs we had for an important reason: to create stable societies. It was a trade off made by our ancestors to civilize us. Remember birth control was only invented about 60 years ago. Nature was inconceivably harsh and unforgiving until technological developments tamed it so much and so well we forgot why we have rules in the first place. I agree though, it’s become a mess unfortunately.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:59 AM
19

Yes, they will keep moving the goalposts and won’t stop until it looks like a WNBA draft or the Barbie movie. And then they will complain about pay.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 11:12 AM
2

It’s amazing to me that we are actually at this point. This isn’t a skit, this is real life
/r/MensRights10/02/25 10:55 PM
9

It’s needs to get all the race, gender, and alphabet grifters out. Focus on labor, bringing back American jobs, securing the borders, tacking corruption that hurts the middle class, promoting intact families (current marriage laws reward breaking the contract) and improving education and training so citizens can meet the standards of those jobs. It needs a total overhaul and to go back to meat and potatoes that challenge the cathedral (the media, business, education complexes that sold out the c…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 10:57 AM
12

Feminism has become even more antisocial and essentially anti-family in the past couple of decades. They are being programmed from puberty through college with this disgusting “me me me” attitude. I tell every guy I can that the number one disqualifier for a woman is if she is a feminist, especially who toes the party line. They are not wife material straight up. I don’t care how hot she is. They won’t take your name, but will gladly take your house and your balls in a divorce. And, no, you are …
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/25 08:48 AM
7

Women still need their snow shoveled and their pipes fitted that’s why. Men doing what they have always done that keeps the lights on in society is beneficial. Why push back? This has always been the nature of humans, self-interested. We want all of the benefits and none of the consequences or costs. The unfortunate reality is there is no need to fight against that which serves you.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 07:01 AM
17

It’s a grift and handout for anyone who isn’t a white or Asian male. Of course it benefits white women a lot because affirmative action and quotas go hand and hand with feminism. Feminism cares about feeding itself regardless of who starves. It’s a total handout to minorities, especially minority women. I’ve seen and benefited from this first hand as a minority woman. I am opposed to it because the chip on the shoulder never goes away, we just move the goalposts while becoming more obnoxious. Bl…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 06:47 AM
21

Women who complain about masculinity have never been expected to do a manual job in the middle of summer or shovel snow at 6am. They are to be ignored.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 11:12 AM
1

I am female and I agree. This misplaced resentment is huge. We are mad at the universe. Most of this comes from a disastrous combination of apex fallacy, penis envy and never fucking worked a real job outside of an air-conditioned room. It’s like women don’t understand men and women are different for a reason and there is no utopia. You cannot get everything you want all the time. What’s more, Feminism completely devalues where women are important (the family unit and maintaining tight knit comm…
/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:48 AM
2

Individual women might eventually care, but I’d argue many don’t care they are being used since they are getting most of what they want and their self-serving interests are so firmly entrenched in the cathedral (government, law, education, business).
/r/MensRights31/01/25 09:21 AM
1

Asian men are underrepresented in the NFL. We should cry about that too, right? We should DEI them into quarterback positions, right? It’s the same stupid logic.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:36 AM
8

The problem is these women virtue signaling their inane luxury beliefs are very persistent in propping up their victim complex and women have a very strong in group bias so many will parrot this same nonsense amongst themselves and vote for more of the corresponding crap that burden everyone.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/01/25 01:46 PM
7

IMO, feminism was never about equality. Most of the time feminists essentially argued for freedom and rights without the corresponding obligations or consideration of second order consequences (right to vote/ selective service being examples).
/r/EverydayMisandry30/01/25 12:53 PM
1

I agree, I did not mean to suggest it’s only a liberal thing. I do think it trends with urban/terminally online/little life experience/“daddy still pays for my Netflix” thing. I notice this trend from those who tend to outsource heavy lifting in their lives like mowing lawns and other kinds of manual labor or who have never worked a physically laborious job. If you always get some guys to do your heavy lifting, you can distance yourself enough to dismiss the value of it.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 10:01 PM
4

What is the end goal of this? What drives these choices from leaders, politicians and bureaucrats?
/r/MensRights23/01/25 01:35 AM
5

Many terminally online people, women, and liberals tend not to do much manual labor or work much with their hands or outdoors and thus don’t understand the value of a truck. Many liberals also live in cities and Uber everywhere and that can disconnect you from why people get trucks or drive at all. It is also thinly veiled contempt of “red” culture (star codex I believe talks about it). “red” culture is a safe target of ridicule without being called an istaphobe.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 01:10 AM
2

agreed BLM is the same powerplay and employ the same tactics except it’s based on color instead of gender
/r/MensRights15/12/24 11:09 PM
2

Apex fallacy and disparate impact theory are used to lobby for preferential treatment for women who make up the plurality of people. These ideas influence actual policy and funding. That’s why giving any credence to the idea of a patriarchy is so dangerous.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 06:09 PM
63

This is correct. This guy’s channel shows examples of nonsense women tell themselves. These women harbor misguided penis envy from an apex fallacy. Girls and Women learn “I want, I deserve, I’m powerful, I’m oppressed”, but nothing about their obligations to their family, their neighbors, their country or society (beyond punching the clock). It’s very anti-social, unsustainable, and has spoiled a lot of women. Feminism in its bid to gain power has successfully blinded women to the reality of bio…
/r/MensRights29/11/24 08:33 PM
4

This is correct - people need to believe in something. If it’s not religion, family, or country, it will be whatever they absorb around them like the current woke garbage.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 12:24 AM
17

Yes, that is true reason after freedom from consequences. POWER. Feminists want to use institutions and governments to leverage power for themselves. Whether it is at the expense of the rights of their male counterparts or destruction of their own society is inconsequential
/r/MensRights29/11/24 12:21 AM
10

This is true. This kind of explains it. It’s the disaster of “good intentions”. Basically there is a cultural power transfer that has been going on for a while now from what is thought to be the orthodox (male, white, older) to the opposite (female, black/brown, younger). I’m Black and female and started to question this via feminism in college and by BLM knew it and its riots were a race-baiting revenge scam from day one. Unfortunately, I am an exception to the rule. I think people underestimat…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 06:38 PM
5

I think what he means is that some women are very adept at needling, belittling or berating their husbands up to a breaking point and then cry foul when the husband/male partner gets angry. Women employ different tactics and are more likely to use their words as fists to emasculate and undermine their husbands. This kind of behavior and manipulation is not taken seriously enough. This is a thing and I have seen it. I’m not sure what OOP’s situation is though and would need more information.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 01:16 PM
5

Because, unlike what feminists would have you believe, this is human nature, not “male” nature. Every movement wants power and there is no logical end point to these dogmatic ideologies other than “more”. At no point does feminism go “have we gone too far?” “What are the second and third order consequences of this?” Too many want the STEM department to look like the nursing department and give no thought to why they might have different compositions or what the true trade offs are for that ideal…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 07:03 PM
3

She is not the one. If this woman doesn’t value what men do and their struggles, find one that does.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 07:32 PM
3

Mainstream feminism has become a lot more anti-social. Look at the position on abortion — it use to be “safe, legal, and rare” and actually consider the ethical implications of ending a pregnancy. This is due to the influence of women’s movement in politics. Now that gone completely out of the window to praise abortion like the second amendment.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 05:22 PM
4

Some women are applying apex fallacy. When it comes to men — they are thinking of the top 10% and apply it to the average guy with “Men have it so easy”
/r/MensRights18/11/24 05:16 PM
2

The ability and the easy incentive to use a third party like the courts to control has destroyed the family unit. At what point does the parent get penalized for using the courts in this manner wasting money and time?
/r/MensRights14/11/24 09:13 AM
1

I’m sorry you are dealing with that. What is her justification for this kind of flipping out when it’s pointed out? Resources on “high conflict personalities/marriages” like Gottman’s 7 principles and Bill Eddy’s books on this like “Stop Walking on Eggshells” can help.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:09 AM
23

a religion endorsed by the state, higher education and corporations. It’s worse than any cult.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:02 AM
1

An author I found helpful was Laura Doyle and I recommend her, Dr. Laura, and The Happy Wife school. It helps women come to terms with their inner state, find healthier outlets for stress, set clear expectations and then keep their eyes on their own paper instead of looking over their husband’s shoulder or controlling others.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:21 AM
0

RIP Laken and poor Jocelyn too, absolutely heartbreaking.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 05:48 AM
18

Feminism can be destructive and anti-social in that way. It fosters a real delusion— women devalue their roles as mothers in families with their husbands and children AND devalue the dirty jobs that men do. It serves corporate more than their communities. Undercutting men in society while women are the majority of its dependents is not reasonable.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 05:43 AM
14

The women who back these movements do not care to understand that. They literally don’t care to understand that men do 90% of the jobs that we NEED to keep the lights on. This is a very dangerous problem because they will go back to their wfh jobs still thinking are victims.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 05:38 AM
4

“How bad could it be?” Is what I thought at first. Then I started listening to her and understood why people found it so grating. I think she’d cackle like that delivering a eulogy.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:23 AM
13

In group preference/ oppressed class patterns. Same reason blacks can have BET, but then pester and guilt trip to be overrepresented and inclusive in everything else even when it doesn’t make sense while excluding other races in their circles. It’s a way to dominate through guilt tripping. The dominant group isn’t allowed to have things
/r/MensRights29/10/24 08:24 PM
8

I think it’s snowballed to what’s going on now. We have become more polarized and the erosion and atomization of society incentivizes more anti-social extreme elements of feminism (and other things) playing more heavily than in the past. More recently, since women overwhelmingly vote Democrat and this election is so tight, there has been more rhetoric to rile up the female vote. Women (and men) back in the day were more heavily invested in their families, communities and religion so that was a g…
/r/MensRights28/10/24 09:21 PM
17

Female participation in the workforce is at an all time high. Women are responsible for the vast majority of consumer spending which further incentivizes companies to cater more to women’s sensitivities. All of this is compounded by biological (female in-group bias) and society’s instinct to protect women and children. It all adds up. It’s a gradual tipping of scales feminizing society at all different angles (law, government, education, etc). This reinforces the incentive structure. Women have …
/r/MensRights28/10/24 08:52 PM
3

This is 100% correct. 70 years of social engineering have not changed our innate differences.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:34 PM
14

This is correct. Not advocating for girlboss assholery here, but the woman in your life needs to have shit to do that is not thinking about you.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:30 PM
8

It’s a shit and control test mostly, but it’s also other monkey brain stuff — I’ve touched on it here. It’s Briffault’s Law. As women are valued for youth and beauty, men are generally valued for utility. Your time is a resource. Social reengineering has installed more female breadwinners, but it didn’t change female mating strategy or behavior. Women prioritize relationships. So for her your relationship (if serious) is her job. It may be a form of mate guarding as well for the relationship. An…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 09:56 PM
4

Attractive women do not need to be a good or morally decent person to fulfill their biological imperative (getting pregnant and securing the future resources of a mate). On top of that, some women (too many) especially pretty privileged ones are spoiled as fuck and have never had consequences. I’m not saying this to be rude - just stating a fact. I recommend reading the Unplugged Alpha as a primer. Too many guys get fucked over because they find this out too late. Imagine being 18 and winning th…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 06:32 AM
7

Karen Straughan discusses how society is currently playing Jenga with its own stability and promoting its own decline this way. Basically women contribute less to the government tax base and by and large vote for more policies that enfranchise themselves over men. However, in disempowering men as the net producers, it erodes the country’s own future tax base. Not enough people have even thought about this conundrum. It’s robbing Peter to pay Paula.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 12:20 PM
3

Despite OP saying she “totally understands” these explanations, she may still be filtering things through her own ego, perspective and inner world as point of reference rather than actually thinking about a man’s perspective, lived experience, desires, and incentives in the sexual marketplace. Not surprising since women like OP are not used to this kind of rejection. It sounds like she is looking for a reason why the ex is “bad” after being rejected when he probably Just Wasn’t That Into Her. Tr…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 04:10 AM
1

I agree, women (and men) are taught support is less valuable and beneath them and empowerment (of the self at others expense, not the family, not the community) is valuable. More specifically, feminism implicitly and explicitly encourages self-centeredness (without the burden of responsibility or performance), the antithesis to support in relationships. If you think support detail oriented focus is oppression, it will be treated as such and held against spouses as the relationship suffers. That …
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:34 PM
4

Karen Straughan is pretty much outlined the problems and consequences here. Feminists and their supporters don't seem to understand there is no such thing as having everything you want all the time. There is no free lunch.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 01:33 AM
2

This is a good example of what I see. I think this busybody behavior is more common than people (particularly feminists) want to admit because it would put the onus on women (who tend score higher in neuroticism) to regulate their expectations and behavior patterns. This is not to say that there are not instances where a spouse is not doing their share, but the “mental load” is at times women’s own inability to trust others with reasonable tether or face their own ruminating anxiety nagging them…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 01:21 AM
2

That's exactly what's happening IMO. It's this weird left wing postmodern self-flagellating position that I've noticed for a while as a POC. It's destructive and divisive to the stability of the anglosphere, but I don't know what can be done about it. You aren't the only ones who sees it.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 04:10 AM
2

I don’t know if the toothpaste can go back into the tube unfortunately without massive reform or a serious decline that threatens the state who props up this current system. Women get most of the benefits of choice and freedom with fewer tradeoffs or expectations and they know it. With no incentive to change, it may only get worse
/r/MensRights13/07/24 05:59 AM
26

Yes it’s a similar monkey brained phenomenon. Women score higher in neuroticism meaning they don’t keep their eyes on their own shit— they are busy thinking about yours and their neighbors. It’s basically an evolutionary trait based on having to be sensitive to their small children. Since we present the sexes as “the same” unless we are complimenting women or criticizing men, this negative control trait gets swept under the rug. It can often develop into a smothering mother or overbearing shrew …
/r/MensRights12/07/24 05:35 PM
113

Spot on, this is why. Briffault’s Law. Men are generally valued for utility. Social reengineering has installed more female breadwinners, but women rarely want to turn around and be those providers. Women have a hard time keeping their eyes on their own paper and spend too much time monitoring what the guy is doing on theirs because what men produce becomes what she (and her potential offspring) has access to and her monkey brain is tabulating that.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:15 PM
13

Jesus, I’m sorry. I wish there was something better I could say.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 12:16 PM
5

It’s not just the UK, it’s most developed nations. It’s a symptom of becoming so “open minded”, the brain falls out and no longer uses discernment.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 11:07 PM
3

We have become so comfortable that it’s allowed large swarths of the population to disconnect from reality and take the social contract for granted. Women think they are better at doing man stuff then actual men (who do 90% of the actual work that keeps the lights on) while completely devaluing the things (raising their kids, femininity) because fat middle aged lesbians are crabs in a bucket. It’s a dangerous game and media pandering only makes it worse.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 12:34 PM
7

This is the case of oppression Olympics and female hypoagency/ male hyperagency in action. Men can’t have problems because women must hold primary victim status at all times (women in a completely different scenario can get raped so your friend needs to sit down and shut up about any particular issue concerning a woman). It’s a gotcha and a power play for them. Try to seek out male healthcare workers and mentors-like associates and see what advice they give. When asking for advice again anonymou…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:57 PM
5

It is getting way more mainstream because men keep the stability of society together and they’re abandoning it. Bingo. Enough work horses aren't pulling the yoke like they use to and warrants notice.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 05:50 AM
3

A church was having drag show? And on Easter? Wtf? This sounds like a skit
/r/MensRights28/05/24 05:45 AM
12

Otherwise known as Revenge
/r/MensRights26/05/24 11:24 AM
32

This, in part, is what got me to start questioning stock college feminism. There was not a satisfying answer to these things even among other feminists. If you want to get a guy or gal thinking, bring up buffet feminism
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:54 PM
1

I think we have been trained to subvert and question everything in our programming and social structures and have gone so far as to throw out the baby with the bathwater. We have seen the clear result of female led households (particularly single parent ones) and it's not good. Women have their roles, but they are not the same as male roles. Women don't realize this until after kids and often struggle existentially. The nucleus of society has been the family for generations and it has been under…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 03:34 PM
2

It's good you are able to discuss ideas with her. I would say that fierce independence is fine when you are single, but that kind of "me first" (to mask avoidance as you mentioned) and transactional mindset doesn't work well in marriage and the family. That's where you will find a lot of women either double down as a self-serving feminist harridan and undermine their husbands or they loosen up and choose being a team player for the family. That’s too big a gamble to wait on, IMO. Husband and wif…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 02:20 PM
67

They nickel and dime whist complaining instead of cooperation. It’s a bad bet to take them seriously
/r/MensRights21/05/24 11:31 AM
2

Yep, once you realize that most women are critical of the Chads in the top 1%, it all makes sense. Hoe_math pointed this out recently. Their penis envy is mostly hypergamy/apex fallacy at work. The regular guys grinding in the jobs that keep the lights on in this god forsaken economy are “not people”.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 12:53 PM
3

The equality they pretended they wanted
/r/MensRights17/05/24 09:47 PM
25

“Everyone’s the problem except me”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/05/24 08:54 PM
2

Jesus, Tell your parents, family members and mutual friends as soon as possible. Unfortunately her moral compass is broken and she needs sane adults to shame that disgusting behavior out of her. Or at least so she understands her actions have consequences. This is seriously appalling and I hope this is fake.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 10:01 AM
1

This guy gets it. Highly recommend Dr. Warren Farrell
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:21 AM
1

What are some things to look for? Here are some general red flags Should I be looking for smaller, more subconscious things because she might be hiding it around me? Or maybe I'm just not good at noticing it? I honestly try and even block these things out This is all part of honing your discernment. Fight that urge to avoid. It’s in observing and sometimes challenging that you learn your girlfriends’ or friends’ values and if they are compatible. It’s part of honing your self-protective instinct…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:40 AM
3

Women have a strong apex fallacy. Once you realize when they say Men have it so easy they are talking about the 1%, it all makes sense.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 10:57 PM
4

That’s because it is disturbing and a symptom a bigger problem in society. But it’s also NPC in-group signaling. Either way it’s not a good sign. Its most generous reasoning is that of the out-of-touch city dweller, but still you are right to find this appalling. I would relay your thoughts rationally and calmly then move on from her. This is not someone who can be trusted.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 12:02 PM
1

Bingo
/r/MensRights06/05/24 10:29 AM
1

Also I want to recommend checking out r/divorce_men, u/pristine-age4601. There are other guys there that can offer advice and support.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 10:03 AM
1

Right on the money
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:21 PM
2

Women like having money, but are disgusted by the self-sacrifice of being providers.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:20 PM
5

A woman with three kids from three different men is on a men's forum trying to convince men that marital commitment is not tethering yourself to uncertainty? Am I hearing this right?
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:17 PM
2

Feminism does not care about stable family, only collecting wives’ grievances to use to justify their policies and rhetoric. Marriage was suppose to be about passing wealth and stability down the future family line and now it’s a wealth transfer from the higher earning spouse (usually male) to women (to spend).
/r/MensRights20/04/24 11:54 PM
8

All you have to do is put yourself in the other person’s shoes. Apparently this disgusting creature can’t be bothered doing anything that doesn’t directly benefit her though.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/24 05:10 PM
16

This woman is soulless and vile and has the audacity to play the prayer card. I wish nothing but the worst for this human garbage.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/04/24 08:51 PM
1

Listen to yourself - she is in complete control over you and set another rule (one year) for you to get with her dual mating progam. You can’t make this up.
/r/askMRP21/11/23 03:49 PM
1

He’s right. This is absolutely pathetic. You have serious scarcity mindset chasing a 30 something woman with another man’s child AND another dependent while falling for her (common) manipulation tactics. This is proof that you can lead a horse to water, but you cant make them drink.
/r/askMRP21/11/23 03:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter