TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

evilawesome Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by evilawesome on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Woah woah woah has nobody else noticed this was a gawker link? Poor form, dude, don't give money to High Council of Shitlords.
/r/PussyPass22/05/15 04:27 AM
50

"But please remember that your sons do not have permission to show aggression, violence, or sexual desire in a way that women do not approve of."
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 10:10 PM
4

I can't believe this is real.
/r/PussyPass10/07/14 04:40 PM
2

Not as a uniform entity which is endowed to all males, no. There can be cases where male privilege exists, just as there can be cases where female privilege exists as well as for any other demographic association.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 07:56 PM
1

I don't mean to be demeaning but it's frustrating to have to explain the exact same relatively simple concept multiple times. As I said before, everyone has certain privileges in certain situations. I never said all men have privilege. I have, from the very beginning, been saying literally the exact opposite. I invite you to quote any text I have written which implies otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 07:35 PM
1

Bro. The question remains unanswered because it is based off of a statement that I never said. I apologize if I'm not making myself clear, but what I have been trying to say, all the way up to my very first ill-taken joke, is that no group has privilege uniformly. Men, as a group, do not have uniform privilege. Even in displays of brute strength, there are certain men who have absolutely no privilege over women in an arm wrestling competition. As I said in another post, there are many situations…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:48 PM
1

I want to address the existence of privilege specifically- I absolutely agree that it has been so horribly abused and maligned by the SJWs that it has almost entirely lost its meaning, but I consider myself a defender of English, dammit, and I'm not going to let them take that word away from me. The word, as I understand it, means "advantages in certain situations that other groups do not have." By.that definition, privilege absolutely exists. If I try to become an investor at a prominent Chines…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:48 AM
1

It is definitely not uniform and definitely cannot be applied to everybody. But there are also certain contexts in which it definitely does exist. The thing is, it exists alongside white female privilege, black female privilege, jewish male privilege, Chinese male privilege, Latino homosexual privilege, etc. There are always situations that benefit certain groups. If you're trying to get a job in certain parts of the south, I guarantee you you're going to have an advantage applying for certain j…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:35 AM
0

I'M NOT SAYING ALL MEN HAVE PRIVILEGE. THAT WAS THE ENTIRE POINT OF MY POST. PRIVILEGE DOES NOT TRAVEL UNIFORMLY ACROSS GROUPS. Christ dudes, call off the dogs, we're saying the same thing.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:12 AM
1

DUDES THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I AM SAYING. "WHITE MALE PRIVILEGE" DOES NOT EXIST UNIFORMLY AMONG ALL WHITE MALES. MANY WHITE MEN ARE EXTREMELY UNDERPRIVILEGED. I KNOW THIS. I'M FROM TEXAS.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:02 AM
-6

Re-read my post, brosef. Obviously certain men have privileges that others do not, but contrary to feminist and SJW belief, privileges do not travel uniformly across groups, which is why there are many straight white men who have extremely disadvantaged backgrounds and there are many people of color that come from extreme privilege.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 12:46 AM
-16

My god... it's almost like privilege doesn't affect all people uniformly. But that's crazy talk!
/r/MensRights22/04/14 12:20 AM
5

Outcome Independence → Abundance There is something really Zen about that.
/r/seduction24/01/13 04:11 AM
1

As I said above, I'm not saying that girls won't necessarily be open to it, just that it might be emotionally taxing to deal with in the long term and is completely unnecessary to a successful practice.
/r/seduction22/01/13 02:10 AM
1

Look asshole, you might be the kind of guy that just enjoys shitting on people, even in "friendly" ways, but I'm saying: if you constantly patronize those around you it affects how they perceive you, and one day you're going to do it to someone who's had a bad day and they're going to blow up at you. But feel free to keep treating people like children every time they say something you disagree with, I'm sure it makes you a lot of fun at parties.
/r/seduction22/01/13 02:09 AM
6

Right at the table. Be sure to start with the sword in the abdomen and move up to the vital organs to ensure as much blood spray as possible.
/r/seduction21/01/13 03:34 PM
-2

Despite your reported success with it, all three examples you gave are pretty douchey things to do, and could easily erupt into long term tension and resentment if she's not in the mood to be patronized. I view these techniques, along with "negging" as the dark side of this practice. You can still get plenty of girls to sleep with you just by being strategic, decent, and confident.
/r/seduction21/01/13 03:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter