TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

exasperation Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by exasperation on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's a whole series of posters, and most of them are actually gay males (which is probably the origin of the specific wording used on all of the posters and the website.)
/r/MensRights27/06/13 06:37 AM
1

This ad is part of a campaign by Health Canada which is actually primarily targeted at gay men (since gay men comprise about 60% of new HIV cases in Canada). All posters (and the website) use the motto "Each time you sleep with someone, you also sleep with his past" which probably has more to do with its gay-male-targeted demographic than anything else. This poster being heterosexual is the exception.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 06:36 AM
1

You do realize the American and German justice systems are quite different, right?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:30 AM
12

I was under the impression it was only for pregnant women to allow treatment to prevent mother-to-child transmission. Are you pregnant? Maybe you should find a non-pregnant woman too, since she'd be equally "discriminated against".
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:13 PM
5

Yes. It's meant to mock those who make comments cases where women are raped like "she was probably dressed like a slut". It also highlights the absurdity of those that would argue the guy "deserved" it in some way. It's a clearly anti-assault and pro-dignity position, even if espoused in sarcasm.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:46 AM
3

That's clearly sarcasm, as you can tell from the rest of the thread.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:41 AM
3

Canada's criminal law was reformed in the 1970s to abolish the act of "rape", and now has sexual assault and aggravated sexual assault, which are meant to be gender-neutral.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:38 AM
1

All of the HIV programs targeted at gay men.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:03 AM
1

There have been studies in the USA of intact vs. circumcised HIV susceptibility, and the conclusion was that there's no difference. The primary means of HIV transmission in developed nations is with men who have sex with men, in which case receptive anal intercourse basically nullifies any minute advantage being circumcised might have had.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:10 PM
3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:55 PM
4

Because marriage records are public, and the wife probably has the same name as the victim. There's a court publication ban on any information that might identify the victim, which would presumably make it illegal for the paper to name the wife.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:54 PM
1

The Crown presumably failed to demonstrate that she is either a flight risk or a public danger. Given that she's got a surety and had a relatively lesser role in the offences (and not being an active participant generally, rather than a passive accomplice), it's not wholly unreasonable. Release before trial is granted by default here, unless the Crown can demonstrate that it's necessary to detain.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:53 PM
3

I'm not sure very many would be. Stuff like this doesn't tend to make all that much news here before trial, because of publication bans and police discretion. Before the content was read off in court, it's likely all that was known publicly was "arrested for sexual assault, etc."
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:51 PM
2

"Bail" isn't normally for money in Canada, although a reasonable bail can be imposed sometimes as insurance that an accused won't run, lest they forfeit their property. That's generally for non-violent crimes though. For violent crimes, the primary consideration is whether a person is likely to commit more offences (e.g., if they went on a psychopathic murder spree) or will run. If the court believes neither is likely, then bail is granted as a matter of course.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:48 PM
4

The plural of anecdote is not data.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 11:14 AM
6

Being unable to cum from penetration is exceptionally frustrating and can cause all sorts of emotional/psychological issues for both partners. If you last two minutes, you can adapt (more oral/manual stimulation for your partner, stick it in when you're both ready to blow). If you can't orgasm, your only recourse is to pull out and fap furiously for twenty minutes afterward. I've seen it with some of my partners, it's not fun.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 11:13 AM
1

Seriously, some men do not precum. Personally, half an hour of heavy kissing and dry-humping and there might be a couple drops.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 11:11 AM
0

That's absolutely false for Canadian law. If your company is open to the general public, you cannot discriminate on prohibited grounds, namely "race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, family status or disability." However, Ontario's human rights law specifically has an exception for this. The right under section 1 to equal treatment with respect to services and facilities is not infringed where a recreational club …
/r/MensRights23/09/11 01:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter