TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

excersian Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by excersian on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

wrong. you don't understand why gender roles exist. SMH.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/25 05:39 PM
3

Survival of the tribe. Men made themselves disposable for the greater good of their tribes during prehistoric times. Women were a limited resource, even in high numbers: women often died during child birth, famines, or rival attacks, and they were less capable on hunting trips and defending against nomad tribes. We still socialize men to be disposable by the cartoons, comics, and movies we watch. And the damsel in distress meme could be viewed as the romanticization of ones family, tribe, countr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/25 05:30 PM
15

True. They prefer for all funding to go to their efforts and concerns, rather than to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 05:35 AM
13

Yes, but also consider that while male disposability has been a staple in most societies, men's value comes from their capacity to build and sustain functional, complex societies. This reliance (on men) was once embodied in paternal norms, where because men were sent off to wars to die for their countries, men maintained exclusive voting rights. And where men were expected to take a bullet for their loved ones, they were also empowered with all ownership rights to land. In other words, while mas…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 05:27 AM
61

Violence against women and children commands far more social and political capital than violence against men. Mens rights activists have been fighting for attention to be brought to issues concerning men for decades. Maybe now that these issues are increasingly less polarizing than before, we can finally see progress.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 04:08 AM
1

When you understand what "patriarchy/paternalism" truly is, and the foundational function it plays in all complex civilizations, setting aside the feminist ideological miscategorizations of it, you'll understand two things (1) defeating so-called patriarchy inevitably marks the end of a complex civilization. (2) and to avoid collapse you must restrict one gender into maintaining their roles, even as the other deny theirs. Most people on this subreddit highlight the unfairness of the new social p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 08:27 PM
7

Once a society grows past a certain population size and/or level of complexity, matriarchal cultures recede, and patriarchal structures form. Men like John Stuart Mill referred to social restrictions that limited his vision of liberty as "paternalism", and all that men like Marx and Engels did was take Mill's paternalism a step further. Patriarchal societies are ordered societies that enforce roles. Feminism freed women of their roles. Men cannot be afforded the same luxury, because the entire c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 12:43 AM
3

Old media is mostly dead. Men are changing the narrative already.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 02:03 PM
8

mens rights are a political and social issue, and not based on economic factors in part or at large. In a perfect socialist system, that embraced feminism as it is today, men's issues would still be sidelined.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 02:01 PM
1

State imposed labor within the prison system is egregious, but I wouldn't quite call it slavery. And even if it were it would be a men's issue and not a woman's issue. Most feminists have to shift the goal post to global issues of female disempowerment to make a stronger case for the necessity of feminism in the US today. This is a disingenuous tactic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 01:39 PM
–

Yes, MGTOW has little relation to MRM philosophy. MGTOW was the first iteration of the manosphere. The MRM shied away from criticizing feminism directly, but the manosphere made no such imposition on itself. And while some of the manosphere members took (and take) very abrasive, and less than egalitarian approaches to their critique, (I believe) it has done as much if not more, to bring mens issues to the mainstream and political spotlight, than the MRA was able to do alone. Cassie Jaye's 2017 "…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 05:05 AM
1

Modern day slavery isn't practiced in the west, and when it is it is criminalized. Shifting the goal posts wouldn't help. The fact is, if you aren't willing to hear leftist men out, you will lose them to the right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 03:52 AM
0

LeftWingMaleAdvocates is a western focused subreddit. Feminism has hardly progressed in India, so it makes little sense to compare. imo. Feminism is also tied to industrialization and wealth. The wealthier your nation is, and the farther your drift from traditional morays, the more likely you are to experience some of the issues being discussed here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 03:37 AM
–

Exactly right! The original philosophy, MGTOW, broke away from the MRM due to the MRAs inability to create real change, and they (MGTOW) weren't keen on watering down their message to appeal to feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 03:26 AM
1

you must live in a cave.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 12:48 AM
1

The feminist patriarchy argument exists whether you like the concept or not. What in the world are you talking about?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 09:52 PM
1

Yes, you and every modern feminist agrees with the feminist definition of patriarchy. That all power in society is paternalistic, with men at the helm, and feminists must revolt not just against the classical definition of patriarchy but the feminist interpretation of it. And yet, feminists still expect men to fulfill the roles of the classical patriarch, to provide and protect. Socially, women refuse to take up the breadwinner role for example, where she essentially financially supports a man w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 09:40 PM
1

Patriarchy, in its original context, was defined as male responsibility over the home, his wife and his children. it is the male role to lead and protect his kin. The term "paternalism" comes from the Latin word pater, meaning father, and it refers to a system or practice in which authority figures (like governments or institutions) make decisions for others, supposedly in their best interest, similar to how a father might make decisions for his children. John Stuart Mill was at the forefront of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 08:58 PM
-4

Far right white nationalists practice in-group preference, misandrist feminists practice in-group preference, therefore misandrist feminists are a far-right. This is a nonsensical argument. Misandrist feminism is not right-wing, they've never been, they are most definitely left-wing. It rises from the ideology that victims of oppression cannot be held accountable for their reactions of said oppression. This is intersectional feminism. Pro-blacks have the same ideology. That racism towards whites…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 08:38 PM
1

men strong. men dominate women. men bad. even when men good men bad. empower women. women above men. women strong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 08:18 PM
1

and you're the authority on what pro-male advocacy is are you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 08:02 PM
4

She's using feminist speak for men need to cry more. LOL. You can't make this stuff up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/24 05:26 AM
30

In Betty Friedan's book that helped usher in the rise of 2nd wave feminism, the Feminine Mystique, she uses the term "the problem that has no name" to describe the deep sadness middle class white women experienced, slaving away as wives and mothers in the 1950s and 1960s American home. You can borrow this term. Except it's new meaning would necessarily carry much more weight when applied to men. So what is this problem? Writers like Gerda Lerner based their arguments for the necessity of feminis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 06:10 PM
9

Your premise is wrong. Red pill spaces are in fact a way for many men to be reassured they're not crazy, and to speak freely about their anger towards the status quo. In fact, this very space is red pill, going against the narrative is what it means to be red pill. If you weren't red pill you'd be entirely indifferent, or a male-feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 11:03 PM
1

Haha, neither Peterson or Murray would argue IQ is a function of privilege. I think privilege is a different subject all together. If men are being privileged in society you’d expect to see them cluster at the top, but we see that’s not the case in society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 08:59 AM
8

Brilliant. I’ve never heard someone use a bell curve to describe privilege, but that’s a spot on analogy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/24 06:27 PM
4

There are male privileges, and there are also female privileges. For an obvious female privilege look at sentences for premeditated crimes. Look at the number of shelters for each gender. And so on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/24 06:25 PM
6

'true believer' - damn, you're right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 06:11 PM
31

He’s an intersectional feminist grifter, who essentially thinks men should man-up to all the misandry levied at them everyday.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:27 PM
7

There's no need to expand anything, and you haven't refuted the original draft argument. The draft is a simple and clear argument that unerringly proves male oppression, borrowing a word from feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/24 11:13 PM
5

Oligarchy concept is well put. But 90% of women would love to marry into the oligarchy. But they can’t.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/24 01:02 PM
3

100%
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/24 01:01 PM
4

I appreciate the compliment. Frederick Douglass was a suffragette, he is not unbiased, but regardless of that his arguments simply do NOT hold up against actual facts of history. The George Washington example is a non sequitur. And to your point about "Mesopotamian era was thousands of years ago. I don't know if we can trust those non-existent statistics"... brother, Lerner's work was the backbone and centerpiece for feminist advocacy throughout the 1980s and beyond. Whether you value her source…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 09:43 PM
0

There is absolutely systematic racism in the US, even though I agree that the issues are more complex. You can learn about the transition from slave patrols in southern US states to formal police forces in multiple books.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 08:52 PM
-2

there was no malicious intent. We're men, light ribbing is normal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 07:00 PM
28

Gerder lerner made a similar argument as you just did in her book The Creation of Patriarchy. She argued that during ancient Mesopotamian times, warring men would invade and take women as slaves to themselves, some raping them but all later making them slaves. Gerner argued that this was a crueler punishment than killing the men. Except, she also documents how women would pretty themselves before and during invasions, with hopes to be amongst the women who were captured, rather than killed. Gern…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 06:43 PM
16

“They Were Her Property: White Women as Slave Owners in the American South”, by Stephanie Jones-Rogers (2019)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 05:53 PM
15

“Black women were the most oppressed” is historically inaccurate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 05:52 PM
6

There's a rise in these views because women are the largest population of social media consumers, and feminist, leftist misandry is a thing. I don't have male misandrist friends, because logic. Both the right and the left are doing everything they can to co-opt this space. The right is winning, the left has Richard Reeves and Scott Galloway. Many women hold misandrist views. It's very common, women occupy a higher percentage of the terminally online after all. Which is why understanding why they…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 11:14 AM
2

Why do you think women reject individualism in men, but not in themselves?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 08:18 PM
1

"So any man like us who doesn't view men disposable or superheroes, are automatically looked down upon by all facets of society, and viewed as "weak men". The demand for male gender roles is what connects conservatives, feminists, and even red pillers together. That's the status quo our ideas go against. This is what we are dealing with." I find it interesting that you used "feminists" in the stead of "liberal women". You suggest your ideas for men goes against the status quo, and that men shoul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 06:16 PM
9

There is no womanosphere. We call female enclaves "feminist spaces", "safe spaces", "women only spaces", or "universities".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/24 01:40 AM
1

my comment was in response to flaumo's comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 07:09 PM
-13

Yes, because the opinion of a biological woman holds more weight than that of a biological man. Love it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 04:20 PM
1

if you don't encounter these convos you simply aren't social.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 06:59 AM
1

sounds like you were passive and allowed her to abuse you till she grew a conscience. I wouldn't advise it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 06:58 AM
1

very well said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/24 05:47 PM
1

Cute, except you forgot to mention white women were able to join in civil rights and gain affirmative action by claiming to be MINORITIES themselves. Civil rights were meant for African American blacks (principally the men) to fend off the very real oppression they were experiencing but WOMEN (white and black women) benefited the most.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 01:05 PM
1

You. Are. Amazing. For writing this.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 12:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter