expendablethoughts Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	New Harvard study debunks gender pay gap: women earn less because they choose to work less than men That's the definition of a pay gap though. That's not r/mensrights definition™, but it's the actual definition used by researchers. You know, as stated in the study linked in this post. Literally in the abstract on the first page. Jesus Christ this sub...	/r/MensRights	26/11/18 02:34 PM
1	New Harvard study debunks gender pay gap: women earn less because they choose to work less than men is that not a job? or does that job not count in your mind because it’s not something you would want to do? You can't take that result and extrapolate it to any other business, so it explains why this company has a gender gap, nothing else. and less holidays, less split shifts, and take more time off They do their regular time just as much, so what you describe still falls under "over time", they do less overtime. it explains how the « ga » » is just a result of people not understanding basic pa…	/r/MensRights	26/11/18 02:22 PM
1	New Harvard study debunks gender pay gap: women earn less because they choose to work less than men You mean the ones that also are a study of a very limited group of people in one city, in one state, in one company? ahah No, I don't bother reading studies about 20 people in Massachusetts.	/r/MensRights	25/11/18 08:29 PM
1	New Harvard study debunks gender pay gap: women earn less because they choose to work less than men I still am, because you just took random examples of a handful of women around to world to confirm your own bias, and that's not exactly proof of anything. Pretty pathetic, I really thought this sub could have something to offer at first	/r/MensRights	25/11/18 08:26 PM
1	New Harvard study debunks gender pay gap: women earn less because they choose to work less than men So it's not debunked, it's validated	/r/MensRights	25/11/18 08:25 PM
1	New Harvard study debunks gender pay gap: women earn less because they choose to work less than men Did you see that post? ahah Yeah, I did post it there because it was saying the burden of proof in a crime involving rape should be reversed...	/r/MensRights	25/11/18 07:48 PM
1	New Harvard study debunks gender pay gap: women earn less because they choose to work less than men No one claimed the gap was non-existent. May I refer you to the title of this post? "Debunked"	/r/MensRights	25/11/18 07:46 PM
1	New Harvard study debunks gender pay gap: women earn less because they choose to work less than men ...in that very specific field lol The answer is "they work less overtime". Also, the study doesn't say how overtime is attributed. In my place of work, overtime is limited, and seniority will determine who gets to do it when two people want it. So if the same number of people of both sexes wanted it, but men had more seniority, they'd have it more often.	/r/MensRights	25/11/18 02:40 PM
1	Melania Trump says women 'need evidence' if they say they're victims No you don't. You have to report it and and the investigator's questions, that's all. If they find your claim credible, they investigate, but you don't have to do anything.	/r/MensRights	12/11/18 06:29 AM
1	Melania Trump says women 'need evidence' if they say they're victims Apply the same standard to any crime, and suddenly, you'll realize that most of the time, the person reporting the crime doesn't have proof. Theft? "Oh well good sir, where's the evidence that you actually had this piece of equipment? No receipt? Too long ago to show up on your credit card statement? No picture of it? Gee, guess we'll harass the shit out of you until you have to move 4 times in the same year and call you a fucking liar on national television!" Nah, kidding, the double standard w…	/r/MensRights	12/11/18 06:18 AM
1	How false accusations destroy lives I wasn't arguing and the context is irrelevant lol get off your high horse mate, this isn't r/incels. If I shouldn't expect a source, then it's worth jack shit, and doesn't deserve any attention whatsoever.	/r/MensRights	09/10/17 08:14 PM
0	How false accusations destroy lives And yet again you found a source for the post, which I already said I did. I was talking about this piece http://i.redd.it/sym7dwhgknaz.jpg Any source on that? And please, for fuck's sake, don't source the post again or I might think you're actually as dumb as you sound.	/r/MensRights	09/10/17 07:36 PM
1	How false accusations destroy lives But then the 16yo has things to learn and is easily manipulated by propaganda. You're saying both are equivalent? If you're not asking for a source on such a claim, you're just kidding yourself or trying as best as you can not to question your beliefs. And that's horrible.	/r/MensRights	09/10/17 07:31 PM
-4	How false accusations destroy lives I get your post is true, because I googled it If you look in my comment history, you'll see I did find a source for the feel good meme this post is about, because people were just rambling about and making stories up since OP posted a feel good meme instead of a source, which my first comment you responded to addressed. If you had read it instead of assuming, you would've known. What I'm asking here (also from the comment you responded to) is where that picture of a text comes from. I'm not here…	/r/MensRights	09/10/17 04:14 PM
1	How false accusations destroy lives No idea, I'm not a football fan. I just googled the guy's name because a feel good meme isn't worth shit in my book.	/r/MensRights	09/10/17 04:08 PM
-3	How false accusations destroy lives I'm only ever so caustic when I see bullshit. OP is posting propaganda memes without citing sources. Post is accurate, sure, but I found that out no thanks to OP though. How hard is it, especially when you're trying to further a cause, to link a Wikipedia article or something? It gives more weight to your claim and shows good faith. But then OP posts some kind of feel good text with no author, no identifiable source? What is that? Why would anyone with half a brain take that at face value? Unles…	/r/MensRights	09/10/17 04:06 PM
-10	How false accusations destroy lives You're ability to post pictures you found on the Internet is astonishing! Do you ever cite sources? I get your post is true, because I googled it, but what is that text? Where is this from?	/r/MensRights	09/10/17 03:31 PM
1	How false accusations destroy lives Yeah, if we got actual articles instead of feel good memes, you'd have your answer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Banks_(American_football) He's actually a NFL player now	/r/MensRights	09/10/17 03:29 PM
1	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" ITT : A cord was struck!	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 02:34 PM
0	Triggered over having their point proven At least I am de facto infertile because my dick is so tiny, unlike you.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 04:47 PM
0	Triggered over having their point proven I did read this one too, but "sourcing" claims isn't the end game, the point is to prove something. His sources were mostly not even talking about what he linked them to.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 01:47 PM
0	Triggered over having their point proven Right, so now you're directly comparing their ability to reason with a toddler. Nope, it was an example of a way to waste your time, not a direct comparison. You assert that I wouldn't waste my time talking to someone about something which is below their capacity for understanding. Two things on that. First, I'm not so up myself that I would assume that I could offhandedly judge others' intelligence. Secondly, even if I could judge so; I would still do my best to help them comprehend. I'm not ta…	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 01:43 PM
0	Triggered over having their point proven There's still a bare minimum I'll engage with, he's below that minimum threshold. Same way you wouldn't try to explain world politics to a toddler, it's just a waste of your time.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 11:59 AM
-3	Triggered over having their point proven The onus certainly isn't on readers to find sources for an author's paper, that's not how any of this works.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 01:44 AM
4	Triggered over having their point proven What about whataboutism though? I often happen to stumble on r/TwoXChromosomes from r/all and never have I felt attacked or made fun of whatsoever. Hell, I'm a man and I feel worse than I've ever felt on r/TwoXChromosomes reading this very post, maybe out of sheer shame for sharing a gender with the type of subhumans in this post, but still.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 01:32 AM
-5	Triggered over having their point proven Possible non-bias causes of the gender gap in tech [3]	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 01:28 AM
4	Triggered over having their point proven Did you cry?	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 12:30 AM
2	Triggered over having their point proven I can't really help you if you haven't read my whole comment, where I mention all of this is not even relevant, as the underlying problem is completely outside of this guy's scope (and yours, coincidentally).	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 12:22 AM
3	Triggered over having their point proven No. That's not the "memo". Is a #fakenews version of the memo from Gizmodo. I we all can see how "rigorous" you are with your "citations" LOL My bad, I didn't know I was talking to someone like you.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 12:19 AM
8	Triggered over having their point proven Well, protests are a way to piss people off, that's the whole point	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 12:12 AM
-5	Triggered over having their point proven He never sourced any of his wild claims. And he was directly attacking Google's direction in doing so. Very bad move all over.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 12:08 AM
–	Triggered over having their point proven typical woman of today. You mean the ones you guys invented and then criticized, but that still only exists in your dreams?	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 12:06 AM
–	Triggered over having their point proven When the bigot subs got shut down, most tiny-dicked neckbeards moved to t_d, then some of them realized господин президент wasn't the best vessel for their repressed sexual urges fuelled angst as he was actually completely senile, so they moved to subs like r/conspiracy, r/cringeanarchy, r/incels, r/theredpill and some others in smaller capacities (including r/Canada, as it happens). Their dicks are still just as small and their balls just as blue and their bellies just as full with tendies and …	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 12:04 AM
2	Triggered over having their point proven Oh yeah, everyone loooves to have a Wednesday off, great deduction mate.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/08/17 11:55 PM
-9	Triggered over having their point proven well sourced opinion WELL SOURCED!? He had zero source, none whatsofuckingever. I have never seen anything as out of place been so poorly sourced. Reddit users have better sourcing habits than this "scientist"! He is a fucking disgrace, not only because he saw fit to expose his private opinion about Google's management through questionable channels on their own turf, but if you're going to do that kind of thing, better actually source it. Funniest thing is that he has the audacity to mention bia…	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/08/17 11:51 PM
–	Triggered over having their point proven Both sides said many others felt like they did, which means some other people could be enclined to bring it up at lunch or something. Have you ever worked with other people?	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/08/17 11:39 PM
–	Triggered over having their point proven has a PhD in biology With a speciality in gender-specific mental abilities? Having a PhD in something doesn't mean you're good at something completely different. And to prove that point, here's the memo, as so many have told other users "you haven't even read it!!1!", I did read it. He doesn't cite sources, he says "may" quite often (all he says actually), goes by snippets, no global analysis, never states anything relevant or pertinent, no charts, no data, no statistics (which are available thr…	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/08/17 11:35 PM