TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

eyucathefefe Archive

View 0 posts and 92 comments by eyucathefefe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I love you too, goodnight dear.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 03:09 PM
-2

Bravo - keep it up, friend! You have found a target deserving of your aggression!
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:59 PM
-3

You're welcome! The MRM has a shocking lack of self-awareness, no?
/r/MensRights05/07/14 03:54 AM
-3

No soble!
/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:19 PM
-7

If you're looking for reason, might I suggest feminism? As you've probably realized, you won't find much here.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:17 PM
1

Just FYI, the mods there ban feminists just for being feminists regularly.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:18 PM
1

Nope, I am filled with glee, and there's nothing you can do about it.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:27 AM
1

Only when people act like assholes and call me a "useless nattering twit." Good job on that.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:22 AM
1

Hey, feeling any better? You were acting like an asshole yesterday.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 11:21 PM
1

Is somebody upset? I'm sorry your feelings are hurt.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:26 PM
1

That's not how I feel about MRAs. So, you are literally wrong. Let me clarify - that is how literally everyone who isn't an MRA feels about MRAs. I thought that was clear. The majority opinion is not always the correct one, but in this case, it is. It's not correct because of their opinion of MRAs, it is correct because of the lack of interest. Nobody pays attention to what y'all say. Who do you think is actually going to read the comments section of this 'hitpiece'?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 06:26 PM
1

Well, yeah. You know how you think feminists are ridiculous and deluded and you don't really pay attention to what they say? That's how literally everyone else in the world feels about MRAs.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 05:11 PM
1

I thought MR was supposed to be anti-censorship...?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:38 PM
1

Nope. The topic was closer to this; the concept of 'men's rights' is less about equality between the sexes than it is about maintaining power and privilege over women. MRAs don't focus their attention on the structural powers that reinforce rigid expressions of masculinity or advocate for a world in which men aren't unreasonably charged with the sole responsibility of being leaders, soldiers and providers. Instead, they've identified women as the source of an imaginary subjugation and emasculati…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:32 AM
0

You are confused about what the word 'patriarchy' means. It isn't something you believe in. It isn't some huge, monolithic conspiracy.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:11 AM
0

I'm sorry that your perception is so deeply impaired. That must be difficult to live with. Patriarchy is a social system in which males are the primary authority figures central to social organization, occupy roles of political leadership, moral authority and control of property, and where fathers hold authority over women and children. It's so fucking obvious that this is the case in so many areas of life that not even acknowledging its existence is just...well, I'm sorry for you.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:23 AM
0

Tell that to /u/bleekdawn
/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:11 AM
0

Genuine feedback and commentary is not trolling. -/u/orangesquashes http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/28i1lt/a_feminist_hitpiece_on_mras_in_australias_public/cibzx1i
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:18 PM
0

Oh? Tell that to the rest of /r/MensRights then, please. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/28jb6h/mommy_blogger_accused_of_poisoning_son_to_boost/cibn24o?context=3#cibmojn
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:57 PM
0

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. It is an intentional disruption of normal on-topic discussion.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:14 PM
4

Hate, revenge, insanity sure but not attention. You are splitting hairs. The mother's desire for attention falls under 'insanity'. In 7% of all cases of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (MSbP), the abuser is male. Those cases are all dads 'who kill their kids for attention and sympathy.' I didn't find any examples after googling for two minutes. That doesn't mean they don't exist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchausen_syndrome_by_proxy#Prevalence_by_gender
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:24 PM
-1

Of course they are culling your comments, what you are doing is the definition of trolling.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:33 PM
-4

The practice is not limited to reddit. You are following orders to troll the comments section of an Australian public media outlet. That's absolutely a kind of brigading.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:49 PM
-4

You cant take their argument and say that all their opinions are wrong because of no citations and then write a equally opinionated piece back with no citations. I put as much effort in as the person I'm responding to. If both of our arguments are invalid, that's fine. My response doesn't need to be valid if theirs isn't.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:09 PM
-5

Brilliant retort there, you tore down all of my arguments. What ever shall I do?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:54 PM
-5

The overwhelming majority of child abuse is perpetrated by women. [citation needed] Men and women are not just "people." There are distinct differences between them. [citation needed] [citation needed] There are not distinct differences. Look into hormone replacement therapy for transgender individuals if you would like scientific support for this. Men and women are pretty much exactly the same, biologically. Any perceived differences can be nullified or even reversed at the drop of a hat. The m…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:43 PM
12

Okay! Here's one. Oh look, another. And a third. And a fourth. I could continue, but I don't feel like sifting through google all day. This is why people say the Men's Rights Movement is anti-women. It's because of comments like this. You think that women are capable of doing horrible, terrible things, but men would never do something like that. Except, they do. Men are people, just like women.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:00 PM
-16

And you people try to claim that SRS orchestrates brigades.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:00 PM
-18

They respond to being brigaded with incoherent shrieking rage.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:58 AM
-2

You're right, it doesn't say anything about the mother - only that she's poor.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:14 AM
3

Feminism isn't that simple! Everyone IS a complex web of 'privileges' and negatives - absolutely! It's complicated. This idea is central to intersectional feminism. its not a simple issue of "you have a Y chromosome, you have your life handed to you on a silver platter" EXACTLY! I think you'd be surprised at what you find if you try reading about feminism from a variety of sources - your entire comment is perfectly in line with feminist theory.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:01 AM
-4

I am, the MRM as it exists today is absolutely misogynistic. Not the concept of men's rights. But rather, the Movement.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:10 AM
-1

You didn't. Where did I say you said that? I didn't. You presented them as being equivalent or comparable. They aren't. Why do you allow for subtlety in men's issues, but not women's?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:59 AM
0

You don't seem to... I'm saying that she very well could be, given her choice of affiliation. ------------------------------------ this is the part you should try to understand You were saying that, because she's female, obviously you aren't misogynists...which is bull honkey. end of the part you should try to understand ------------------------------------ I didn't miss anything out by not posting that, there's plenty of poop floatin' around :)
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:41 AM
-2

That doesn't invalidate my argument. Women are fully capable of being misogynists. Just because you're allied with a few doesn't mean the MRM isn't misogynistic.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:05 AM
0

No, I was pointing out that your response is flawed. Having women in the MRM...does not mean that y'all aren't misogynists. People who are racist sometimes argue, "But I have [insert skin color here] friends, I'm not racist!" That argument is not valid, for the same reason that yours is invalid. (Also, women are fully capable of being misogynists.)
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:55 AM
-6

"I'm not racist, one of my best friends is black!"
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:43 AM
-3

Part of the problem may be that you're equating "being fleeced" through divorce settlements or paying alimony...to gang rape. They are nowhere near the same thing.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:33 AM
1

Neither are right in their hate, and yes, we do really need to shun them for it. Both are wrong.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:18 AM
0

Sometimes I wonder if people join to only have something to fight, instead of reaching the common goal of equality. That would be /r/MensRights, yes...
/r/MensRights16/05/14 11:53 PM
4

(and bold)
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:00 AM
1

*get warnings
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:15 PM
3

...maybe it's because poor people are more likely to be arrested for domestic violence than rich people are?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:59 PM
1

All existence is ultimately a subjective perception as far as we think we know. That's such a useless position to take! There is a reality outside us, it is consistent and true for everybody. Embrace the collective experience, brother.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 07:41 PM
1

It's not an ad hominem attack, his perspective is fucking shortsighted. Pls learn to identify arguments. I did not make an attack on his character. I made an attack on his ideas. There is a big difference.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 07:10 PM
3

I'd say that the real 800 pound gorilla in the room is the fact that free will doesn't exist.
/r/MGTOW15/03/14 07:00 PM
1

You could call it that! That's a big part of why I think we should abandon the idea that there are only two genders, and everybody should fall into one of those two categories. There's more than that out there.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:45 PM
0

but society does and will continue to make this association. How very shortsighted of you...
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:03 AM
1

Naw, they don't get confused - the people that this shit is beyond do :)
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:24 PM
-1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender of particular note; Most societies have only two distinct, broad classes of gender roles, masculine and feminine, that correspond with the biological sexes of male and female. When a baby is born, society allocates the child to one sex or the other, on the basis of what the genitals look like. However, some societies explicitly incorporate people who adopt the gender role opposite to their biological sex; for example, the two-spirit people of some indigenous A…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:01 PM
-2

A dick doesn't make a man, though! There are a shitload of men without penises. And there are lots of women with them. And then there's everything in between! There's no division, we are all the same. The fact that you can radically, quickly change your body and mind with hormones says to me that gender is just an illusion, it's just chemicals. Not that we must be split into those two categories.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:44 PM
-1

Dividers are bad, yo. That's interesting about Norway. but...Nordic countries don't exactly have the best track record when it comes to diversity. They are incredibly homogeneous, a big part of their stability comes from that established largely homogeneous culture. I could be wrong, but to my mind, that's more than enough to explain the difference.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:06 PM
-1

Sex and neo-natal hormone exposure are not 100% linked. There's a lot of variation. Assumptions about people based on their sex are applied pretty much 100% of the time, though.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:51 PM
-1

It's great that those researchers found a pattern - but that's just one study, using a single metric, to draw sweeping conclusions about gender. Environment and upbringing have an enormous impact on brain function. That could easily explain a lot of the differences, and it's something they didn't control for. (Yes, you can control for this. They would need to do brain scans of men and women from different cultures, probably.) Beyond that study, I think it doesn't matter how a 'typical female bra…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:31 PM
-1

There are definitely tendencies - most of them centered around 'survival', which I'll get back to in a bit - but if you look at enough human cultures throughout the history of the earth, you see that masculinity and femininity change dramatically over time. It's all situational. It's all fluid. Very few aspects are static - and the ones that are, are almost always a situation where men dominate women somehow. That is kind of fucked up, and should be examined. Back to the survival thing - we as a…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:10 PM
2

Any level of female interaction is safe, as long as you treat them like human beings. Otherwise I would strongly recommend limiting any and all interactions. Sexual harassment laws do apply in public spaces.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:16 PM
-3

Having two kids doesn't make you an expert on gender blarhlkhgdknvlkldfj;ac,m
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:06 PM
-3

I treated them as close to the same as I could Society didn't. Did you let them watch TV? That alone is honestly enough to do it - just look at advertisements for kids toys, or how gender is portrayed in most TV shows.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:27 PM
-4

Well this is an impressive amount of sexist crap.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:12 PM
-7

It is basic sociological theory, it is something that you can learn about easily. I'm not going to teach you basic sociology.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 03:09 AM
-6

Theory about patriarchy has more of a reasoned, academic foundation than anything used to support the men's right movement. Conflating it with your perception of the "jews run hollywood" idea is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 08:09 PM
-6

I have no idea, I never said anyone did. Patriarchy itself is really, really blatant. Patriarchy is a social system in which males are the primary authority figures central to social organization, occupying roles of political leadership, moral authority, and control of property, and where fathers hold authority over women and children. It implies the institutions of male rule and privilege, and entails female subordination.... Historically, patriarchy has manifested itself in the social, legal, …
/r/MensRights05/03/14 06:55 PM
-6

Aren't conspiracies supposed to be hidden, though...?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:51 PM
-4

How much feminist theory have you read? Actual feminist theory, not just stuff written about feminism. Unless the answer is "A lot", that's not an observation, that's just a lie.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:32 PM
-2

Me too! They're a lot more reasonable and logical than most of the other ones.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:19 PM
-3

Yay, unsubstantiated sweeping dismissals!
/r/MensRights05/03/14 04:27 AM
2

Gaius Balthar, everyone.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 11:27 PM
-20

Hahahahaha. Feminism lacks intellectual rigor? Feminism is CONSTRUCTED on intellectual rigor. Get a grip.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:26 AM
1

No shit - as the men in command, it's their responsibility.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:01 AM
-1

Law isn't all there is in the world. Law is needed to fix problems. Problems that exist outside of the law. If you think that every human being is on exactly the same footing as far as opportunity goes, you are ignorant.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:51 AM
2

Nothing positive has ever come out of that subreddit, only vile hate Ha. Look in mirror pls. I was fed up of her shit and decided to throw some back...[others] trying to defend her but I didn't care. She needed to know [blah blah blah]
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:40 AM
0

There are already social divisions. This initiative is intended REDUCE those divisions. It is not race baiting.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 09:38 AM
5

You were banned because: CreepyPMs is also a support sub, a safe space for people who have been creeped on. That means comments that are not conducive to a supportive and positive environment may be removed, even if they don't violate the rules. NOT a space to brag about being an abusive shitlord.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 09:03 AM
1

-_- You can't just shoehorn a word in. That isn't how... Fuck it. I'm wasting my time here. Your choosing to do a shitty job drawing parallels between situations does not make me dumb, it makes YOU dumb. You have to actually use logic instead of mindlessly replacing a word. Bye.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 08:53 AM
1

A type which is now effectively mainstream feminism, yes. It IS mainstream feminism. "Radical" as an adjective has a specific meaning. It does not mean 'crazy' or 'niche', it means that you want things to change. NOW has a 'membership' of 550,000. That's goddamn tiny, that is not a mainstream feminist organization. They are a group that was founded during the second wave of feminism, maybe that explains their position?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 08:28 AM
1

THEY DO! Or they should, if they're actually feminists. If people do not oppose changing those things, THEY ARE NOT FEMINISTS.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 08:07 AM
1

The family court system biased towards women for very anti-feminist reasons. Women are supposed to stay at home and take care of the kids, men are supposed to have better jobs. It's bullshit. It's not a 'pro-feminist bias'. It's an ANTI-feminist bias.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 07:49 AM
1

I don't know if you know much about the legal system, but there...aren't really any pro-feminist biases.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 07:38 AM
0

It's not about whether or not the crime has a victim. It's about the exploitation of the legal system to get what you want. You're focusing on the wrong part of the equation. If this was about something like rape, y'all would be blaming the victim. But now, you're putting blame on the aggressor (who is mostly in the wrong) - which is good, but not something that doesn't seem to happen too frequently here...
/r/MensRights27/02/14 05:30 PM
-3

No, but that's not the point.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 05:20 PM
-2

I wonder if you would make similar arguments in support of a victim of rape...instead of in support of a husband against his snitch of a wife.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 05:03 PM
7

So a woman with a degree getting a divorce is suddenly "feminist academia destroying marriages"? Women can be educated too, bro.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 04:11 PM
0

That's absurd, you can't use one example of feminism doing bad things to vilify all of feminism. That is illogical.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 01:26 AM
-2

That representation is not accurate, to my knowledge. Do you have any support for this? You seem like the ignorant one. Your perception of feminism is WAY off base.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:34 PM
1

Haha, wow. That is...that is an impressive amount of misogyny and bullshit. Bravo. I'd almost be offended, if I thought more of you as a person. You're stuck in the past. Winners adapt. You are not a winner - you are an asshole.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:50 AM
0

What? That's pretty much literally the opposite of what most feminists believe. Sex trafficking is a problem. Not all sex workers are victims. The sex industry should not be criminalized - most feminists would prefer legal regulation, criminalization causes problems.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:11 AM
0

Huh, I didn't know people still believed in that kind of baloney in 2014!
/r/MensRights25/02/14 02:54 PM
-12

Feminists still didn't 'start it'.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 03:49 AM
0

Yes, it seems like she has a negative view of violence and dominance and aggression. Those are not intrinsically masculine traits, though. The common perception of masculinity is a poor one. Real men are better than that.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 03:24 AM
-20

They started it, not us. It isn't our fault that they chose to be sexist. Those are the words of a child. And it shows a HUGE misunderstanding of history. "They" started it? Women started it? lol, no.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 02:48 AM
1

Maybe you were just a dumb 8-year-old? I know that I had personal agency by that point...in fact, most 8-year-olds I've interacted with have been pretty smart. Given a choice between public- and home-schooling, they would all make the right choice, I think.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:59 PM
0

They are not growing a child who can choose freely and gender neutral, they are subtly imposing femininity into a boy because masculinity is bad. No, they are not. Your abuse of logic is astonishing.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter