TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

f__ckyourhappiness Archive

View 0 posts and 268 comments by f__ckyourhappiness on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

There was no other way . . b̶̨͚̖̖̭͇́̑͆̅̍͌̊̑̍̀̿̏̏͠r̶̨͖̠̯̰͕̻͔̱̣̖̀̽̒̓̋͂̀̈́̋͠͝ö̵̢̢͎̘̼̗̱̭̦̽̂̿͘ͅt̷̙̏͛̄̀̽̊͋̎̃̈̋̂̎ḩ̸̨̮͕̞͕̩̭̝̗͕̬͉̋͜ͅë̵̛̠̹̬̭͔̅̑̃̏͊̓̈́̎͑̃̓̕͝r̴̯͙̠͋̊̒͝͝͝ . .
/r/MensRights26/07/20 03:44 PM
-4

Sharing make believe stories on a serious post about sexual assault is offensive?
/r/MensRights26/07/20 03:41 PM
3

Oyasumi Sex Episode 1 should've taught you better, it's like your parents never cared enough to teach you properly.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 01:15 PM
3

Hello cousin, this is me your fuccbudi. Plese sned mony.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 01:11 PM
3

Jokes on you I fucked my mom first, how'd you like my sloppy seconds tunnel buddy?
/r/MensRights26/07/20 01:05 PM
3

If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 12:50 PM
3

What emoji? Reported for trolling!
/r/MensRights26/07/20 12:46 PM
3

The colors r invertd you can see this when they pan past the lizardpeople who should be yello but instead look trans-parent.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 12:36 PM
-2

They exist, but they've been withheld from the public because they depict two action figures jumping around on a zoomed in cut of his ass, which was used to fake the moon landing.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 12:08 PM
-32

Right! Move over u/doubedickdude there's a new sexual partner in town!
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:58 AM
3

Saying you insulting a multimillionaire is "punching down" because she's a woman is inherently sexist against women, I don't understand how they don't see that.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 04:53 AM
-1

I see, so it truly is an incel viewpoint then. I DEMAND AN UNSULLIED VIRGIN! lol I come to this sub for the progressive views on men's rights and equality for men, but it's interesting how often the conversation devolves into sad little mgtows and incels crying about their archaic hypertraditionalism not being accepted by the progressive culture working towards the advancement of men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 12:36 PM
-1

I'm confused. Are people not supposed to enjoy sex, or are they supposed to be happy with sub-par sex? Sounds a lot like incel virtue signaling. Like "I DON'T WANT HER TO KNOW WHAT GOOD SEX IS SO I DON'T HAVE TO DO ANYTHING TO KEEP HER!", or something.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 04:38 AM
2

I could smell the religious nutjob on you from the start. I'm not going to engage you on this issue, I'm certain plenty have tried to use common sense to show you the difference between requiring a fear of eternal torment from a "benevolent" god to keep you honest and moral, contrasted with any other regular human being that knows right from wrong by dint of human empathy. I distrust people like you that base their entire existence off of a fairy tale, while saying everyone that disagrees with t…
/r/MensRights16/07/20 12:17 AM
1

I thought your point was what you had stated is all, I didn't realize the true complexity of your masterful wordcraft was hiding the shitpost "lul shit sub gg" in it. Truly brilliant.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 08:48 PM
6

Oh damn, I was way off then. I thought you had said things that get upvoted on that sub are popular opinions My bad.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 06:18 PM
8

I can't even begin to understand your point. I'm not fighting you here, I said you had a spicy take. What exactly is your point? If it's so complex that restating it makes me wrong, you might need to spell it out for us dumbdumbs.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 06:14 PM
9

Upvoted = popular That's literally what I had said you said. That's not twisting your words, that's repeating them.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 05:56 PM
16

"Anything that gets upvotes on that sub is no longer an unpopular opinion" Interesting angle. Very spicy.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 05:53 PM
-5

No I dig man, I dig, I'm just trying to understand your views is all. What vows? I can't find any literature on it.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 05:50 PM
-5

Ah I dig. Why is it a bad thing?
/r/MensRights15/07/20 05:44 PM
-5

Will had clearly abandoned his responsibilities to his wife. What responsibilities? Edit: First off, they were in an open relationship, so your religious bullshit has no room here. Second, these downvotes are great example of mindless dogma overcoming a Socratic approach to an argument through willful ignorance. Not only does it show that trying to understand the others person's point of view is not important to you, it proves that making someone walk through their logical fallacy step by step s…
/r/MensRights15/07/20 05:18 PM
1

12/f/jap OwO
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:08 PM
1

It's why it's impossible to cum and pee at the same time, you have to drain the cum to make room for the pee.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:05 PM
8

I'd let u drain my intelligence to 7 bby <3
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:02 PM
5

Someone failed 5th grade sex ed. Testicles.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:00 PM
1

If you're using a standard you don't agree with as the basis of your ideology, aren't you just betraying your own principals at a fundamental level? This is 2020. No one worth dealing with cares if you like wearing dresses as a guy or are a really hairy girl. Saying that nonbinary means not conforming to society while still using society's standards is really bizarre.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 03:41 PM
4

That's one of the issues here. She's demanding child support after taking half his life from him.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 10:46 PM
6

Would you demand child support after that?
/r/MensRights08/07/20 10:45 PM
6

I'm askin if u wan dat succ
/r/MensRights08/07/20 10:10 PM
6

So like, is that a yes to the implication or should I look elsewhere?
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:25 PM
9

He got 400mil of his own money, lucky him to get some of his own earned assets. Are you insane?
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:16 PM
18

Maybe 20/80, and that's stretching it. It's like saying me sucking your dick every day for a year entitles me to half your company. Little did you know I would have done it for free!
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:15 PM
9

The Chinese make up a vast majority of the entire world's population, yet they're considered a minority. Reddits ToS have no fangs. Link the name.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 08:44 PM
10

Sounds a lot like they weren't reported for targeted harassment, defamation/libel, and terrorism then. Do we have a name?
/r/MensRights05/07/20 05:30 PM
9

But we can track down who was spreading the rumors and hold them responsible.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 02:59 PM
1

After having $200k stolen from me "legally" by my ex, I now only keep close friends and fuckbuddies. You don't have to get married to settle down and enjoy life with someone, but MGTOW takes it a step further and says "fuck women amirite they deserve rape for not letting me use them".
/r/MensRights30/06/20 06:36 PM
9

And now you see what it really is. There are support groups for men or women, then there are hate groups for either. This happens to be the latter.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 05:18 PM
-7

It means suck dick instead. They're so uber alpha Chad that they decided taking it up the ass was less effeminate then trying to make relationships work with women.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 05:17 PM
1

To be fair I was quite abrasive and dickish in my delivery.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 07:03 PM
4

That's a fair point.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 06:52 PM
2

My current issues would not be issues if I had the money to make them disappear. My current goals towards happiness and dreams would be achievable with the money to make them happen. Who's saying only women can be fun? "Debauchery" or recreational human pleasures for those not prone to demonizing basic human interactions is by its nature a form of pleasure aka happiness and hurts no one, who the hell are you to decide it's wrong? Would you not take a 10/10 person to have sex with over your curre…
/r/MensRights28/06/20 06:39 PM
3

Apparently you're in the minority on this sub, everyone else thinks that they should remain poor until they've suffered enough to appreciate a reward. It's baffling to see these people actually say they wouldn't take financial freedom in a heartbeat.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 04:59 PM
7

That's why you put your couple years in, make your $50 mil, and retreat to your own little private world doing whatever the fuck you want for the rest of your life. I'm not saying money buys happiness, but I'd be a lot fucking happier sipping pinacoladas on my own private yacht rather than having to watch people die in front of me every day with regrets and longings for what they could never accomplish in their pitifully short lives going with them.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 04:47 PM
1

That's a lot of assumptions placed there buddy. First, you assume that the stress and effort required to get there "legitimately" somehow offsets the remaining few years of life you'll have left to enjoy it. Second, you pretend that being able to start out doing whatever you want and building experiences and living a stress and carefree life right off the bat is somehow an UNDESIRABLE thing. Third, you postulate that anyone can make it there. Do you really think that out of 7.8 billion people yo…
/r/MensRights28/06/20 04:38 PM
-2

To believe that the "Journey" is working your entire life instead of exploring the world, doing everything you want, and creating memories, is so far detached from reality that it really doesn't warrant further conversation. If you really think work is the point of life you need to seek counseling.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 03:53 PM
-9

Oh it fucks with them, undeniably. But I'm sure he'll be able to come to terms with his "issues" with his bikini model/psychologist over a weekend on his 3rd yacht anchored at his private island.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 03:33 PM
-31

Financially independent for life, devoid of all responsibility, and loved by millions at age 14. My what a hell that must be.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 03:23 PM
-44

I can see how unspendable amounts of money and any woman you want at your beck and call could be unpleasant.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 02:42 PM
-1

I don't usually post to most of the knee jerk stuff I see here, but to answer that person's question, all you have to do is file a false accusation against them.
/r/MensRights23/06/20 04:01 PM
5

And then the leader of the Airforce's Anti-Rape SARC went and raped a chick. It's okay though he's friend with a general who pardoned him.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 12:44 PM
1

You, apparently.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 06:35 PM
7

It's an onion article
/r/MensRights09/04/20 09:44 PM
4

r/savebrendan
/r/MensRights07/04/20 03:12 PM
0

No you're totally justified in preempting attacks against you for no reason. No blankets or pajamas They can choke you in your sleep. Two words about furniture: Killing machines. Board your windows up The sun is bad for your health. And always wear a strait jacket So you're safe from yourself.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 07:01 PM
0

No one said you don't have any right to post things about a topic just because you're "x". It's like being mad at people for asking why you're making a racial statement about pistachio icecream. The two have nothing to do with eachother.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 06:54 PM
19

You just had a whole slew of idiots respond to you thinking you justified her head butting him, while you were showing that flipping the sexes shows clear sexism against men, and that the mma bitch was to blame. Reddit is great.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 07:37 PM
1

Beat her fucking face in, full equal treatment.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 07:33 PM
1

Empirical evidence can contrast with lab results, I mean most of what those studies show is results in mice. I wouldn't throw anecdotal evidence in there though, it gets a bit wishy washy. So while potentially possible, without taking muscle plugs and subcutaneous fat plugs we can't really know.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:49 PM
1

Intermuscular brown adipose tissue. Carb up.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:18 PM
3

A mastectomy can be mostly performed through the armpit with minimal scarring. You'd still probably see some evidence in the first pic though.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:15 PM
3

You can influence your bodyfat, you can't substantially change your fat deposition I mean, define substantially. Studies suggest exercising muscle groups browns the local yellow adipose, making it the first to be used. https://www.cell.com/cell-metabolism/fulltext/S1550-4131(18)30241-9 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445983/
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:09 PM
1

You can, but it might not be ideal depending on your body's requirements.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:02 PM
3

Or a strict diet and extensive cardio. Fuck anyone that runs everyday amirite. I mean you need adipose tissue just to exist, it's in your freaking bones, so reducing it to unhealthy levels is just that - unhealthy - but to say that people have to go through all of what you just said to attain that physique is disingenuous at best.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:01 PM
0

This is attainable by most with a highly strict diets and exercise. It's not advisable, but it's doable. 40x15x40 with no muscle generally is not. In either case, MSM just finds someone fit and photoshops the proportions.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:57 PM
2

I think it might be the "pulling busses" part.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:28 PM
2

Atta boy.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:26 PM
0

Hell yeah bruv! I'll bring my thigh blaster and kegel weights! Haha no homo!
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:22 PM
0

Right on bru! Wanna do some Billy Blake's Tai Bo with me to some NSync and maybe charge our JO crystals later? Haha no homo bruv!
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:18 PM
0

That username explains the post.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:10 PM
1

Why does it matter that they are trans? Edit: So are we just downvoting because we don't know how to make a response or because no one can give a reason?
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:06 PM
1

Thanks for the feedback, I'll look into it.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 05:30 AM
8

Before I put in any more effort, do you have any evidence suggesting Republican voter fraud? ​ I play both sides, so it would be nice to use in the future.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 03:20 PM
5

Both parties are corrupt as fuck my man, but lately it's been county after county with Democrat voting being allowed later than any other party, and thousands of votes being convienently found just in time to win the votes but just barely under the required amount for recounts. ​ Add in the fact that several people are already under investigation for allowing illegals with DACA IDs to vote and you've got a shit storm even the alt-right couldn't outdo.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 03:08 PM
9

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud ​ Or just simply look it up in that cute lil search bar above: ​ https://www.reddit.com/search?q=democrats%20voter%20fraud ​ ​
/r/MensRights16/11/18 03:02 PM
17

Um, The Dems are the ones committing Voter Fraud with illegals and dead people... ​ ​ I'm Centrist. Even I see how fucked the democratic party is this go around.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 02:58 PM
1

It's 16 in Texas.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 07:34 AM
2

Sex definately should define any areas where nudity is an issue.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 04:29 AM
-6

So rather than separate the girls and boys they subject themselves to possible legal ramifications?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:09 PM
-5

Why would they need to?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:17 PM
4

Fucking hell this is incredible, makes me want to doxx every one of those shitheads, especially the dude that joined in an assaulted him. Fuck that guy in particular, he deserves jail time.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 08:33 PM
2

Don't call people names. It makes you look like the moron.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 05:40 PM
5

Kinda funny because I am probably closer to a scientist than most people posting Before someone r/iamverysmart s this, mind explaining your job?
/r/MensRights14/11/18 03:44 PM
3

Is it not r/twoxchromosomes? Or have they acknowledged the existence of their extra chromosomes?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:49 AM
1

I find u/Elvick's content to be low effort and uninspired.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:48 AM
1

Wasn't assuming, was just requesting it not be used for a fallacious agenda. Sorry if I sounded like an asshat. That document draws a lot of conclusions, but most of them are fairly well founded and cited.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 08:09 PM
0

Just don't go full Black Lives Only Matter with it, it's a Men's Rights issue.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 02:58 PM
6

I sound like someone who's been through a failed marriage and 3 failed engagements. Everytime it becomes about greed after they find out how much money I make, thinking that they no longer need to do anything to support us. That or they consider the nest egg I've been building for almost a decade somehow now THEIRS. Dank meme tho bro.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 02:55 PM
2

Why, <-- begs a question, used here as imperative quip. hello <-- A formal greeting. Ms. Salma Hayek. <-- A presumably unmarried female.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 01:14 PM
1

Weaponizing Sex is a Sex Crime, bottom line.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 01:11 PM
3

Of the 4084 African American lynching victims EJI documented, nearly 25 percent were accused of sexual assault137 https://lynchinginamerica.eji.org/report/ 1/4, not 1/3.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 01:10 PM
1

A klot of us are required to know First Response/SABC though, that wouldn't fly.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:59 PM
3

That Kangaroo Court Reference was spot on.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:58 PM
1

Why wouldn's't've you used two?
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:42 PM
3

I've always had an issue with this. It's like you want to use the Roman root, but you fail halfway. If you want to say 1000 times something you put a line over it (Macron diacritic in Greek) so 1000x1000 would be M̄ in Roman denotation. If you're going to use a Roman root with M=1000 and say MM=1000x1000, why not just use a Greek root and say KK=1000x1000? It's equally assinine, and yet I see that all the time too. If you say "That's gonna be 5k." people understand you mean the greek Kilo- or th…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:24 PM
6

Better than life in jail/$500,000 in debt.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:01 PM
2

10 millimeter dollars?
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:01 PM
3

Westernized Women and Preying Mantises have almost identical mating rituals. Attract a mate, dominate them, then once they've fertilized you tear their heads off and use their bodies to sustain you and your young. Letting that barbarism die out is only beneficial for our species, the problem is Western men are too lazy to go get a foreign chick, they need that instant gratification.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:59 AM
7

While you have somewhat of a point, we're talking about performing life-saving procedures on a female. If a male is bleeding out of his leg and you apply knee and hand positive pressure on his groin to stop the blood flow, is he going to claim you raped him? No, he's gonna be happy you saved his life. Can you say that about the average western woman is the question. The answer sadly is no.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:51 AM
5

Modern Western Women* It's a level of entitlement mixed with a sense of of superiority and knowing they're indemnified of any of their actions and immune to all repurcussions simply because they're women. I call it Americanization. This is the reason I will only ever date/do anything with non-western women. It's just not worth the risk.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:47 AM
8

Oi, you're making us real assholes look bad, ya cunt.
/r/PussyPass08/11/18 02:13 PM
2

You literally said Lesbians don't exist. That's an absolute. Now answer the question as to why Gay Men are totes real but Gay Women aren't.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 05:38 PM
1

If people can be exclusively attracted to railroad coasters I'm pretty sure they can be attracted to anything. Also, dealing in absolutes you've basically ruined your own argument. There is no such thing as 100% in this world, especially when it comes to something as fickle as a human preference. It's like saying no one in the world likes the taste of feces because it lends no biological benefit / incentive, but you'd be an idiot to think that shit's not all over the web. You're delusional if yo…
/r/MensRights02/11/18 05:25 PM
6

It makes so much sense! I KNEW Dinosaurs never existed!
/r/MensRights02/11/18 01:04 PM
14

Oh, thanks.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 12:03 PM
29

wat
/r/MensRights02/11/18 11:59 AM
1

as a board member Translated: As someone truly disposable / not neccesary to my shop. I’m not your enemy here Yes, you are. You're directly spreading BULLSHIT misinformation to try and derail a known issue. On top of that, once called out you don't just admit defeat, you double down on your idiocy. If you're truly in the armed forces I can guarantee that won't be for long. God forbid you even try to advance either, you'd be reamed. Fat fuck FITREP explains everything you need to know. Nice judgi…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 12:16 PM
5

That was like responding to a slap with a roundhouse kick. Well done, own words eaten.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:47 PM
19

Can we sue fluids?
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:27 PM
5

A straight man dealing with an overly aggressive female might take the easy lay. A straight man dealing with an overly aggressive gay guy has to literally fend off someone unwilling to accept no. You can put lipstick on a pig but it doesn't change what it is, let's skim the silver lining off the top of this ses pool for a second. If you break down the thought process behind what you said, we get this: You're saying that since there's a possibility of a situation happening in one side and not in …
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:22 PM
5

No, this isn't about gay or straight, it's about male and female. You're implying that Gay Men are more inclined to be aggressive rapists than women. If you have stats to back up this claim, by all means do enlighten us, but otherwise get this Misandrist garbage off of r/mensrights, it's pretty fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 07:36 PM
20

So you think gay men are aggressive rapists? :thinking:
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:15 PM
65

False accusations of sex crimes belongs in the same catagory as sex crimes. It was a crime that utilized sex as a weapon.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:04 AM
3

White girl appealing to people claiming savage black men raped her with their MONSTER CAWKS vs White girl appealing to people claiming little asain men raped her with their micro deks. Steryotypes subconsiously influence all knee-jerk decisions, even if you're prepared against them. That's why it's important to save all decisions until after all evidence is collected, because 28 years ago she knee-jerked the Jury into finding them guilty almost immediately with no evidence. It's bullshit through…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:00 AM
2

I try to make sure it's resorted to within the first 2 replies.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:41 PM
2

rather thin meme
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:58 PM
1

fair enough
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:12 PM
2

You should be able to say "If you get pregnant I do not consent you to keep my DNA.".
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:04 PM
-3

Technically more sanitary, but that doesn't mean you get to force it on others.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:02 PM
1

Hitler had some great motivational speeches, think I'll hold a rally at my local Elementary school to help them figure out life with the helping hand of Hitler.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:01 PM
1

Watch more porn. You're like a grandmother putting devices in every electrical plug so it doesn't leak out. Fellow Circumcized Dude
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:59 PM
2

While true, it's also true that removing the clitoral hood from females is also hygienic, yet that's declared genital mutilation/torture. What this primary issue is, is that you never had the choice, and that's never okay. Let your kid get circumcized when he's older if he wishes so/has hygeinic problems, not before. You wouldn't preemptively remove a child's tonsils or appendix BEFORE they become an issue, would you? Nor would you break your child's jaw in preparation to accept wisdom teeth 20 …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:56 PM
2

fine Poe's Law line between memeing and r/braincels levels of ignorance you two crossed it
/r/MensRights16/08/18 10:27 AM
4

Wtf is wrong with the tits on that sub? Half of them look seriously fucking distorted and the other half look like fleshy soccor balls. Nothing attractive about a giant hard mass, I couldn't get over the look much less the feel of something like that. Edit: Holy fucking hell it's like something a 13 year old would draw, people are supportive of this?! She looks like the horrifying reality of those Nutaku ads I keep seeing... Jesus christ... https://www.reddit.com/r/1000ccplus/comments/95qb95/mor…
/r/MensRights12/08/18 04:40 AM
1

I guess that was a tad insensitive, and not what I was trying to state. Changing it now.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:06 PM
2

By law, which is where you drew your logic from, there is no difference. By philisophical virtue, there is a significant difference, which is what he was trying to make you understand. He's not a pedo, he's trying to make you see the absurdity of the laws your abide.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:04 AM
-5

I don't know a single person who hadn't had sexual experiences before they hit highschool. I mean r/incels was a thing, so it must happen, but you're highly underestimating the frequency of the occurance. He also didn't accuse the other person of wanting to have sex with the son's gf, he accused the father of believing it would be rape if the son had sex with the same-age gf, which is still fallicious logic in itself, but your response was a tad ridiculous. >and you go after her too implies lega…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:48 AM
1

lol you got shit on dude gg
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:42 AM
2

Dude, just quit, you lose. The law needs extreme reform, doesn't make underage sex okay, but you're arguing using pedantic semantics. If the 18 year old is sheltered and has the emotional maturity of a 12 year old, then it should still be considered rape, whereas I've personally been hit on by 13 year olds while in highschool that were taller, more developed, and more mature than my fellow classmates. Sexual maturity should be defined as the FULL understanding of ALL implications of sexual acts …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:39 AM
8

At the risk of being featured on r/ihavesex, As a band and rotc nerd with no friends in highschool, I still got some head in the MTG club. It's everywhere, and you can't stop it no matter how hard you try. Hell my first sexual experience was at 12, when my friend down the block asked to see what a penis is and started playing with it when I obliged. It's unavoidable, and you pretending it won't happen is more dangerous than preparing for it happening, you're one of those parents that doesn't mak…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:32 AM
1

!redditsilver
/r/MensRights25/07/18 10:26 AM
1

I mean, both (right wing) and (left wing) news sources confirm it. I'm not sure how it's bullshit, but you seem like a reliable and unbiased professional news source so I'll totally take your word for it.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 12:13 PM
2

What? No, dude. I even said above that peeps are overreacting to this chick. Read all the outlandish statements this dude I replied to said and you'll understand the context. They pushed a "minorities can't be racist / white males are alt-right terrorists / check your privelege" agenda at me after I asked them if saying "NO BLACKS IN NIGERIAN PARLIAMENT" (the exact same thing as this sign in a different country) would sound odd to them. This guy also went off on a racist rant and when asked what…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 12:06 PM
2

Racism is prejudice + the power to act on that prejudice in a systematic way. False. Racism is defined as prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior. There is no basis nor need to identify political motivation in determining racist intent. Removing racism from minorities and attributing it only to a specific race is a practice so far removed from reality I can only assume you're completely insane. You'…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 07:33 AM
0

You cannot ban any minority race from anything in America, unless you want to make "safe spaces" or "private conventions" for minorities specifically excluding white people. We have legislation protecting minorities, but not protecting white people. Minorities are HIGHLY prioritized in all legislative context and benefits programs. So your first point holds zero value or substance, and you really should drop it before you bring further ridicule to yourself. >systematic acts of racially motivated…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 07:15 AM
6

What a slippery slope you've adhered to. You do realize that black people are highly overrepresented in crime rates in America, but that in no way justifies racism againt them, right? Your improper use of false equivalency thereby justifies every hate crime ever commited against black people. Hell, you're even agreeing with the disgusting Japanese internment camps of our ancestors. You're not seriously saying that if a small percentage of a group commits heinous acts the entire group should be j…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:55 AM
3

I'm not sure why you're still trying to defend racism by cherry picking biased statistics... You get why we abolished it right? You don't honestly agree with Apartheid do you?
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:34 AM
6

Cool, and African nations are executing Apartheid on white people, killing them if they do not relinquish their land to black people. In no way does that justify racism against black people.. You're so fucked in the head you can't see this VERY simple issue with your logic. I'd say seek help in changing your skewed worldview, but we all know bigots are completely unable to be reasoned with.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:22 AM
2

I see your point, there's been a lot of fake stuff in this sub lately and my faith in it has been waning because of it. Your second point is pretty standard "Check your privlege" childish nonsense. What you're implying is that if the majority were flipped it would be perfectly okay to discriminate against black people. Using your logic, the bullshit "N*GGERS GO HOME!" KKK protests in New Orleans and other predominantly black areas with black officials is totally justified. By no mental gymnastic…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:16 AM
12

If you're cool with this sign, would "NO BLACKS IN NIGERIAN PARLIAMENT!" strike you as odd? Your comment is grossly ignorant at best, and a disgusting worldview at worst. But yes, getting upset by one irrelevant white 20's blonde college girl's sexist and racist viewpoint is a bit overracting. She won't make it far in life with a bigoted worldview, so the worst we have to worry about is her spitting in our coffee.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 05:30 AM
8

Making a flirtatious comment is sexual harassment? Cool, then so is cleavage. There goes half the women I've ever worked with.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 08:12 AM
3

My gay friends call me a "fucking faggot" all the time when I'm sucking their dick.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 01:17 PM
29

20? Progress!
/r/MensRights29/05/18 05:47 PM
2

Don't, they're the stupid ones for writing it like that
/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:28 AM
3

I'm going to the lake to go fishing. They're fuicking retarded in their word usage, and it definitely should be "in order to" instead of "to".
/r/MensRights26/05/18 08:56 AM
4

It isn't sexism, it's just actively promoting sex-based hatecrimes. annnnd go fuck yourself
/r/MensRights24/05/18 08:06 AM
1

Let me simplify this for you. You don't see Democrat keynote speakers at a Republican Primary. You don't see hate-speech endorsing bigot keynote speakers at a humanitarian charity event.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:33 PM
1

That everything I said was pro-trump? Miss me with your low-energy trolling.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:27 AM
2

Sorry, what? Trump is against socialism... What are you even on about?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:33 AM
3

It's called copying a link and pasting it. You're asking me to do your research.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:15 PM
8

Angry? No, no. Frustrated. You throw around accusations and pretend that this sub is counter productive without providing any evidence, and that irritates me. Normally when you refute something, you show evidence for the contrary.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:21 PM
17

In what way is this a double standard? You think we condone men being sexist toxic pieces of shit? We hang them up to dry just like this worthless meatsack. The best thing to do for "dangerous" speakers is t ok let everybody hear how dumb their ideas are. Ah right, totally worked for the dictators of Europe didn't it? Either grow up or get out.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:09 PM
26

She said all men just die. Not exactly "charity friendly". I doubt if Tom Hanks said, "Slaughter every walking fleshlight.", he'd be given keynote speaker at any charity event. She dug her shit hole and now she gets too wallow in it. Why don't you go join her?
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:05 PM
17

OH SHIT
/r/MensRights12/05/18 08:20 PM
14

You can definitely go to the media with your son's side, if given his permission. Just not the "victim's".
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:39 AM
8

No. Humanitarianism started out as equality and has stayed as such; equal human rights for all. FEMINISM started out as a disparity between sexes and sought to equalize FEMALE rights to men's tiers in a time where there really were issues with it. Then, not wanting to lose the special priveleges that comes with outward attention, they pretended to redefine feminism as humanitarianism, but in doing so kept the name Feminism to imply FEMALE rights instead of Humanitarianism for HUMAN rights.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 07:12 PM
2

You're the only one that drew that parallel.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 11:21 AM
11

Because women are less likely to be arrested, even for felonious acts. What's your point?
/r/MensRights24/04/18 09:10 AM
3

The losing card I'll someday lay, so this is all I have to say....
/r/MensRights24/04/18 09:08 AM
1

I'm not trolling you, I'm seeking clarification. Sex=XY/XX/XXY Gender=5,000 mental disorders. Gender is what you call yourself. Calling yourself Male, Female, or Both, is not GENDER, it is SEX. In this same train of thought, calling yourself GenderQueer is only defendable with "I think it therefore it's true.", which is the exact same excuse used by ALL OTHERKIN. You are NO different. In fact, your unwillingness to admit this point and instead trying to shift the flagpole and misdefine terms is …
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:52 PM
4

I personally believe that misandry exists, but I think misogyny is a much larger issue. The legal system/society would disagree. Find me anything that supports worse conditions for women than men in any aspect. intersectional feminism is beneficial to all It's called Humanitarianism and has been around for far longer. Stop hiding behind the Great Pussy Flag pretending that FEMALES are actively fighting for equal rights for all (FEMINISM) when it's HUMANITY fighting for everyone (HUMANITARIANISM)…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:46 PM
1

No, x-kin is nothing to do with genderqueerness. Again, defining yourself as something other than you are puts you in the exact same category of mental disorders, I'm not sure how you're even trying to argue against this. X-kin are people who believe they are a different species. You're exactly right! This mean they should be given preferential treatment, especially the otherkin that are species which genderflop constantly. They should get their OWN bathrooms and their OWN prisons, although sinc…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:41 PM
3

Interesting... Truly interesting. So for a Man claiming to be a female to get Rape charges elevated to prey upon the social pressures exerted on the judicial system, THEREBY TRODDING UPON AND PREYING ON THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM ITSELF, should not be persecuted/ostracized, but for utilizing the same social norms to prey upon women the only acceptable punishment is death? How very peculiar.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:35 PM
1

x-kin has everything to do with gender identity. If you say otherwise, you're losing the support of 90% of your backers and effectively stating a "NO TRUE SCOTSMAN" fallacy. If you say you're a certain gender, then x-kin (including genderqueers) must follow that or risk losing their own argument. Not following such standards removes your argument from logic altogether, thus placing it in the realm of "fiction" and "fantasy". You're essentially arguing plausibility of falsehoods. What's your stan…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:31 PM
1

uv ben band frum r/speling Bad bot.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:27 PM
3

If they prefer to be called something and treated as a woman, then fine. They aren't going to be treated as such in ways that matter, such as Medically or Judicially, and shouldn't expect such. No one rejects them sexually. Traps are hot, yo.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:26 PM
1

Does it define what the other communities accept it as? For instance, what seperates a Foxkin from a Transexual? They percieve themselves as an entirely seperate entity sexually, thus crossing the "alternate sexuality" threshold. Furthermore, what defines "Pansexual", or differentiates it from any of the other 5,000 mental disorders of preferred sexual identities? Where's the scientific standards dictating the sexual orientation of Godkin?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:20 PM
4

So you're saying if I identify as a female I can attend battered women's shelters to prey on them? Neat. Let me know if you need any more common sense.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:16 PM
0

Wasn't asking for evidence, you simply tried to state that I had to prove a human-made fantasy was somehow not real, and I told you I don't have to disprove a fantasy.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:13 PM
2

You're free to provide peer-reviewed articles against genderqueerness. That which requires no evidence to prove requires the same amount of evidence to disprove.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:10 PM
4

Does your sense of self telling you weather or not you have Sickle Cell Anemia or Tays Sachs Disease dictate how a doctor administers treatment? Does believing you're a Female change how a doctor administers treatment for male-related diseases? No. You have the XY gene and everything that comes with it. It's there, and you have to accept it. Adamantly refusing reality and selectively not believing something IS the way it IS constitutes mental illness. Your sense of self dictating your treatment …
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:07 PM
7

What the fuck does this matter in a logical/scientific discussion? Your gender doesn't matter, you could be a foxkin for all we care, if you're XY, genetically you're male. You can never change that. Alternately, if you want to be treated as a woman don't flip flop to men's rights when it's convenient for you.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:58 PM
8

That's fine, no one wants to get rid of them. We want to get rid of their unique treatment and special rights. Declare what you are, then follow ONLY that. Don't flip flop when it suits you. "But I was a man so I should get men's rights, but I still want to get the special treatment of a female.". - Trans Special Pleading
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:56 PM
9

No one cares if you get a fake penis or vagina. No one. What we care about is you getting special treatment, or hanging on the fence and taking the rights and treatment of both sides, which is bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:54 PM
4

(though there is an argument in the lgbtq community that genderqueer of various sorts can be considered trans). There's no definition, so you have to accept anything anyone says it is and have no right to do otherwise. This is what happens when you don't use science to define your standards.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:50 PM
0

r/outside is not r/LoL Don't confuse the two.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 09:13 AM
1

I'll upvote you for your civility and your willingness to engage in logical discourse, but you haven't gone down the proper avenues and channels to deserve debate yet, my man. Take a scientific and critical approach at your own content, review all counterpoints to it, and see if you can actually defend it with solid logic and evidence. After that, ask about why you're wrong.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 06:51 PM
4

This is a new level of Dunning Kruger shitposting. I hereby dub thee inventor of "Logical Fallacy Soup". So much wrong mixed altogether in a "seemingly intelligent" way, used only to spoonfeed ignorance in an appealing way. As Martin Luther King said: "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity."
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:26 PM
1

Well fuck me. I had no idea. Thanks, man. That said, the membrane is regularly inverted and exposed to air, changing the relative moisture and composition of the "biome". I guess if you invert a vagina regularly they could be considered similar.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 03:55 PM
0

So you don't understand the difference between Mucosal Membranes and your Epidermis? Nice. Any more ignorance you want to throw around big guy?
/r/MensRights02/04/18 03:37 PM
1

I wasn't attacking people that were uncircumcized, I'm actually glad you kept your sensitivity instead of having the choice taken from you. However, since you want to be an ASSHOLE about it, here's this research from the Center for Disease Control AND the US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health: CDC's Male Circumcision Recommendations Represent a Key Public Health Measure Medical male circumcision has been shown to reduce HIV transmission to an uninfected male partner. Resu…
/r/MensRights02/04/18 03:28 PM
1

Raw science says you're wrong. Bacterial breeding grounds readily breed bacteria. That's what they do. Take away the breeding ground, bacteria breeds less readily. Wish I was given the option though, my parents did it as a bullshit "christian" thing at birth instead of giving me a choice, now I last forever even when I'm trying to get off quickly to the point that it's frustrating, because I lack sensitivity (a benefit of having foreskin). Out here in shithole Afghanistan there are many instance…
/r/MensRights02/04/18 02:57 PM
0

All I said was that it's hygienic. Not sure why everyone gets mad at facts. I don't advocate doing it to people without their consent, as is done to children.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 12:40 PM
-4

Calm down my man. I only said it was hygienic, which it is. Shaving your pubes is the same way, but you don't see me waxing my body. Didn't suggest any of what you said, nor do I advocate it. I do not believe in circumcision without choice. Do not circumcise your kids.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 12:39 PM
-9

Hygiene, for one. Edit: Not saying to cut off your foreskin, just saying that is undeniably more hygienic than keeping it. Just, don't do it to kids. If you want to do it as an adult, by all means do so. Wish I had the choice. Edit2: Because some of you are caustic fucks even though I fully support retaining your foreskin until you're at an age to decide what you want to do, here's this from below: However, since you want to be an ASSHOLE about it, here's this research from the Center for Diseas…
/r/MensRights02/04/18 12:08 PM
7

Well now I actually feel bad. Fuck. Good bot.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:52 PM
7

When I was little, I lied about inviting the handicapped kid to my birthday party, so my mother marched me up to the front of the class and made everyone watch as I ACTUALLY invited him. Putting people in the situation they cried wolf on is pretty effective.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:48 PM
7

She was arrested and charged with one count of false report of a felony. She faces up to four years in prison and a $2,000 fine. She will however receive 1 night in jail and a purple ribbon for spreading awareness. I want to die.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:45 PM
2

Looking like a feminazi/lesbian for starters.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:33 PM
1

She should face fines and penalties now that her bullshit was proven wrong.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 08:31 AM
25

Almost every time actually.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 05:19 PM
3

Pound me too
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:40 PM
1

If you cheat, you should be fucked over.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 03:32 PM
0

I'd bet it's really just the USA's entire population.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 03:31 PM
2

Ah yes, enjoying another roid rage are we? We don't need roids but sure, I'm coming down from my workout. That has little to do with my message. Too cranked up to tell that we're saying the same thing? No, it sounds a lot like you're trying to define masculinity and gatekeep what "being a true man" is. You even pretended like fighting off insurgents has a "masculinity" requirement. I'd be happy to listen to what you meant if you'd like to clarify it, but as it is you just sound like another RedP…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 05:17 PM
4

When our enemies approach with the intent to rape and pillage our land, should we explain to them that they are simply suffering from toxic masculinity? Or should we send our strong soldiers to defend our land? How fucking backwards this is. I work with the "strong soldiers" of both ODA and OIR units (the elite units that do the "manly" jobs), and none of these guys parade around like jocks as you would portray them. I'd say roughly 40% of them are bi or gay, 80% have beards and are jacked to al…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 05:05 PM
1

I hope the son sees this and disowns the mom, calling her ever Christmas just to remind her of the father she killed.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 09:11 AM
5

You haven't seen the ads run in Europe...
/r/MensRights01/03/18 03:51 PM
-1

u'v
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:31 PM
1

r/speling
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:29 PM
1

frum
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:29 PM
-1

band
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:29 PM
-1

ben
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:29 PM
2

POUND ME TOO Well, since you asked so nicely...
/r/MensRights23/02/18 06:56 AM
1

Specifically targeting someone should automatically put you on the list if his alibi is proven, but lying about it in general should also do the same thing.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 04:43 AM
2

You can't actually exercise your brain with mental gymnastics. Humanitarian = Human rights across the board. If Feminism is social equality of the sexes, then so is Men's Rights. Why not be a Men's Rights activist then? Why are you so hung up on MAKING SURE that people know you're a feminist, instead of a human rights activist? God damn man...
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:52 PM
6

Are you actually retarded, or simply unable to read? It even says ON YOUR LINK "organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests". Fuck off with your misinformation, here's the actual definitions: Feminism noun fem·i·nism ˈfeməˌnizəm/ the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. synonyms: the women's movement, the feminist movement, women's liberation, female emancipation, women's rights; informalwomen's lib "a longtime advocate of feminism" Humanitariani…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 08:57 AM
10

Humanitarianism (True equal rights) is not Feminism (Women's Rights). Every time I explain this to "suffragists" they retort with, "No, but we've REDEFINED Feminism. Now EVERYONE is included.". To which I respond, " No, it's Humanitarianism and always has been. Including more groups in your own simply bolsters the support behind your agenda, it does not, in any way, change the meaning of what you're championing. Feminism is ONLY about women's rights, while Humanitarianism is about EQUAL RIGHTS. …
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:11 AM
1

I get the argument that it may dissuade real victims from coming foreword There is no situation where this could happen though.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:27 AM
7

Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. If you have to "expand" equal rights to make them equal, they weren't equal to begin with.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:26 AM
3

fixed it there you go she gets 50 years, good catch
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:30 PM
3

herp derp my bad, it should be equivalent to the projected false imprisonment time for each person, then compounded as 1/2 unit each additionally after the first. So about 50 years. https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/working-group-reports/simplification/MULTIPLE.pdf UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:21 PM
2

username does not check out
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:09 PM
2

WHOOSH Cannot reason with idiots.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:06 PM
1

I can't tell if this was completely sardonic parody or concern trolling given the username.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:06 PM
4

A (singular) false rape allegation, yes. herp derp i was wrong This was 3 counts of that. You're dead on with your math, good job. Please ignore, she deserves 50 years according to established law.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:04 PM
-15

Those weren't your thoughts. 10-30 years in prison should be reserved for much worse penalties Were your thoughts. You don't see the scope of what she did. She is a criminal, and this is the appropriate sentence for such a criminal. That said, I do believe rehabilitation in psychiatric treatment should cut it down by half. Getting raped in prison is going to be ironic justice in itself.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:04 PM
12

What I mean is allowing it to continue is what propagates it. You might call it shaming, but there's no reason to pretend that some lardass has the same sexual appeal as someone who works out to take care of their bodies, outside of specific fetishes. Loose and Flabby Tight and Fit Pretty conclusive what 90% of people want.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 02:25 PM
75

Are you saying OP was propagating FAKE NEWS?
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:37 PM
-5

r/incels has said that for years now Spez: Downvoted here, upvoted in explanation...
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:32 PM
3

everybody adores rapists Wait, is that sarcasm? Do I have to stop raping everyone now? Shucks.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 03:51 PM
1

pics n stuff tho
/r/MensRights08/02/18 10:38 AM
2

I thought labling a radical end of something as it's whole is what the dems did to us? TIL the circlejerk conquers all logic.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 05:50 AM
4

ME TOO THX
/r/MensRights21/10/17 12:13 AM
8

Yes, doing it on reddit is much healthier.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:32 PM
4

You, sir, deserve gold.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 10:40 AM
31

I feel this article needs to go on r/twoxchromosomes I'm already banned, anyone wanna earn their badge?
/r/MensRights02/10/17 08:40 PM
1

TheRedPill ideally would seek to reduce the current social situation back to that of 1950's America, wherein gender roles were well defined and women were submissive to thier husbands. This was accomplished by strictly enforcing social norms until the change was made in their favor. This is really the only way to bring it back, by involving a mass populous in enforcing a new social norm. Which is really fucking backwards and regressive, but would be really beneficial to me. Saying "Don't you thi…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 05:11 PM
1

Nice stats. Would've been nice to have proof links, but right idea. I'll make more in a couple years here than you will in your entire life, while validating my existence. Prove your wealth and status, I highly doubt your story. You're a beta acting out and need to be put in your place. Give us a demonstration or shut the fuck up, you lying little betabitch. If I need a piece of ass I take time off to fly wherever I want and get whatever exotic meat I want, because unlike you I can afford to do …
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:49 PM
1

I'm American, dank goat meme though bro. Do you have anything to say to contest it, or are you so completely incapable of rational thought that you resort to calling someone a retard and running away like a little bitch?
/r/MensRights02/10/17 01:57 PM
2

We already have. We no longer outcast our sick and leave them to die, nor do we purely favor straight sexual interaction for the sole purpose of breeding. We no longer rape every woman we see to spread our seed, nor do we enslave others to make them do our work for us. We are no longer frightened by things like lightning, because we understand what it is. These are things developed very recently. Things with biological imperatives that would otherwise normally drive them (and still do in primiti…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 09:12 PM
1

Don't you think there could be seen unforeseen bad shit happening because of it? The absolute logical answer would be that controlling interaction is the ideal solution, much in the way red pill teaches us to always control and manipulate the situation to our interests.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 08:59 PM
4

Nothing to apologize for brosky, just a simple language barrier.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:42 PM
3

Darker hair goodbye 30% of the population short or medium height goodbye another 20% of the population average looks goodbye yet another 30% of the population You're now working with 20% of the population that now has to fit your interests to be compatible. Do you see the issue here?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:37 PM
2

but if that's true then why does my gender have more things in favor of it the the other followed immediately by we need to admit that there is an imbalance of power favoring women "Why does my gender have more things in favor of it?" "We need to admit women are more favored of the genders." ergo, you called yourself a woman I was confused by your wording.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:33 PM
1

Boom. Stats. Thank you for backing up your views objectively. That makes things more clear. I honestly cannot contest most of that. I did say that America isn't fully functional, if you'll recall, and I never did argue against the "shithole" aspect. The slavery thing is a tad bit odd, mind linking a source? We kinda had a war to end that and whatnot. It's worth noting however, none of this indicates a Third World Country. Please tell me exactly how America is a third world country OR ADMIT YOU W…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:30 PM
3

Bane gives advice on Dating. TIL
/r/MensRights01/10/17 12:29 PM
1

30k what? What's TRP? Is it like ERP? Do you want to ERP? I'll start. 12/f/Japan supah kawaiii!!1one! You? Don't leave me hanging bro.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 12:28 PM
0

Ah, so you're a woman?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 12:27 PM
3

Then there you go. Now, if you're willing to travel, are you willing to give girls you normally wouldn't a chance, like you think they should do for you? Do you think you might be willing to go for the bottom 80% rather than the top 20%? How about the lower 50%? Your chances increase phenomenally the lower you go.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 12:25 PM
2

When are you going to state how it's a third world country my man? Gonna list off more nonsense? How about we talk about nuances of other countries, like how they operate on an actual archaic principal like a Monarchy? What about them having Age Of Consent of 11? How about being completely controlled by religion, with protests punishable by law? HOW ABOUT THE RELIGION THAT CONTROLS YOUR GOVERNMENT DIDDLING CHILDREN AND GETTING AWAY WITH IT? America is no where as deplorable as most of those "sup…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 12:22 PM
2

Human Construct - something created by Humans I don't think you should have to settle but you should give others a chance in dateing not only the top percent. If we break this sentence down into two parts, we can see why it's wrong. 1) I don't think you should have to settle Implying that they should go for the best they can get. 2) but you should give others a chance in dateing dating not only the top percent. Implying that you should settle instead of going for the best you can get. So which i…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 11:09 AM
3

You really need to spell check man. Not trying to be offensive, but everything you've typed in this thread has come across as a 14 year olds ramblings simply because of the spelling... this coming from a mod of r/speling
/r/MensRights01/10/17 11:04 AM
2

Less whining. More statistics. I'm not inclined to do it myself, because it doesn't affect me. In RedPill terms, I'm an alpha in the upper 10% value, and I get the women I want without issue. If I had these issues, I might try to help. I certainly sympathize for you though. Note: I despise the red pill
/r/MensRights01/10/17 11:02 AM
1

No, but it would win the "Irony Award of the Century".
/r/MensRights01/10/17 09:15 AM
-10

I'm told burning people on crosses tends to garner attention. I recommend going for the smallest employee.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 09:14 AM
2

This. The boys premeditated this action. It was thought about and agreed upon and is not rape. The same would be inherently true if the genders were reversed, but unfortunately it would be considered rape no matter what. Age of consent needs to be lowered to the age of conscious decision making, special circumstances notwithstanding.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 08:31 AM
2

that link's staying blue, even for me
/r/MensRights01/10/17 08:26 AM
1

Feminism in it's actual form is accepting both the good and bad equalities, and is something r/mensrights advocates for Current day SJW feminism doesn't help women, it's a platform for "perceived minorities" to grandstand their flawed views. Quit fishing for negative comments to bash with flawed logic.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 08:16 AM
1

good bot even if youre a filthy commie
/r/MensRights01/10/17 08:12 AM
2

You are correct in your assumption of why things have developed. You are incorrect in maintaining that as the current day truth. You do not carry around machetes for fear of wild beasts, because it is a problem which no longer exists. In the same aspect, women are no longer entitled to protection or care, as they are equals. Perpetuation of this dissonance from reality simply reinforces the problem.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 08:07 AM
1

Increase your scope. Is traveling 50 miles for a relationship too much for you?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:44 AM
3

millennia-old strategies and behaviours kick in almost automatically. Humanity has developed the consciousness to understand that in a world where certain factors are no longer an issue, it is no longer correct to hold onto the methods for preventing them. Ex: You don't carry machetes and rifles around with you anymore, as there is no need to defend yourself from the wilderness. (At least outside of third world countries.) What the OP doesn't understand is that dating is a purely HUMAN construct…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:42 AM
1

What do you suggest to change it? Protests are about presenting an idea and making sure it is heard, so those with the knowledge/ability to make the change do so based on the popular demands. You are right though, he's being a whiny bitch about it. Could've been approached much better than this.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:38 AM
1

You're giving a coherent logical argument based on morality. TheRedPill is supposed to be amoral. You are being traitorous to your own cause, even if you are correct.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:35 AM
1

Constitution is hereditary, fitness is personal. Big difference. This is coming from an alpha with bad genes and an awesome body, making 6 figures in Afghanistan. Your RedPill logic makes you the beta in this situation, so you should be submitting to my words and backing down.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:33 AM
2

This is exactly where the red pill narrative breaks down, sadly. Your cannot compare Modern Humanity to any other creature. We have ascended past the need for hunter-gatherer mentality, and unless you're living in a remote mountain area with no trade or stores, TheRedPill makes no sense whatsoever. . The reason for the "Men are commodities" mentality did arise from that logic, but it is no more.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:29 AM
1

You're arguing morals with a Red Pill shrill. He, by definition, knows no morals, as TheRedPill is amoral. He is correct in the purely logical sense, you are correct in the purely Moral sense. That doesn't make him a good person. TheRedPill is a fucking disgusting organization used to prey on women, but god damn is it effective. It is extremely insightful, and I've put their lessons to good use in the past. If you want an easy lay and want to condition women to fawn over you, go to TheRedPill. I…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:25 AM
-9

Yeah, key the employee's cars and pop their tires while you're at it. Management will get the message soon enough.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:20 AM
-9

I have a friend with Autism, he still believes in vaccines. Your outraged sentence is lacking in intellectual merit. This is MensRights, not r/Tumblr, keep the sensationalism to a minimum. The issue here is that he was circumcised AT ALL, not some knee-jerk clickbait about a retarded mother. Circumcision is hygenic, as is removing excess labia. Does that mean it should be FORCED on a child? Oh hell no. It SHOULD be a free option for those that want it later in adulthood though.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:18 AM
0

Really because here's my personal experiences I'm going to use to make a subjective argument rather than rely on unbiased facts to form an objective statement defending my position. FTFY And America was kinda made because of religious freedom, specifically at the time Christianity. Oh boy, America was made for ALL types of freedom. That doesn't mean you can push it onto the government. I also question how "Christian" the people in your community were. Dank "No True Scotsman" fallacy buddy. I dou…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:07 AM
1

How about the outcry when Americans tried to remove things relating to religion from the state, such as Ten Commandments in Government installations, the bible in Courtrooms, and "Under God" from the Pledge. State and Church are separate for a reason. Unless you want me voting on how you practice your religion, keep your religion out of my Government.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:04 AM
1

If anyone needs any help of any kind they immediately call me and expect me to help them because I am Christian Not because you're a decent human being? You need the threat of fire and brimstone to force you into action? You give yourself too little credit, you're a good person, stop trying to give the credit to your god.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:00 AM
4

but america is also a third world shit hole when it comes to almost everything. Lol someone doesn't understand basic economics. Explain how America is a "Third-World shit hole". Unless this is just unintelligible sensationalist nonsense, which I'm sure it is.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 06:51 AM
-1

This is incorrect. You are not forced to be swayed by terrorism (ex: a woman beating your face until you leave an area you're legally allowed to be in). You ARE allowed to eliminate the threat however, through whatever means you deem justifiable by the situation, ranging from physical violence to justifiable murder, all in self defense
/r/MensRights01/10/17 06:46 AM
4

there are none
/r/MensRights01/10/17 06:43 AM
7

It looked like her friend went to her aid, while his friend walked him out of the area. No one jumped in to help, they ALL saw that the dumb bitch got a TASTE of what she deserved and casually dispersed. I even heard a laugh in there.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 06:43 AM
2

3edgy5me
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/16 07:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter