| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | This guy was being called a pansy on the radio for being abused by his wife. He called to promote his indiegogo to be able to see his daughterDon't be ridiculous. Modern feminists are claiming a long history of victimhood and oppression that doesn't exist. There's no 'historical conspiracy'. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 07:00 PM |
| 5 | This guy was being called a pansy on the radio for being abused by his wife. He called to promote his indiegogo to be able to see his daughterFeminism wants you to believe a revised historical version of the world. It isn't true. There is no massive legacy of oppression, nor would such a legacy be relevant. That's the kicker: it isn't relevant. Today is today, and unrelated to what happened elsewhere or in other times. There is no need to oppress men to somehow 'balance' imagined wrongs. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 06:34 PM |
| 7 | This guy was being called a pansy on the radio for being abused by his wife. He called to promote his indiegogo to be able to see his daughterYou went straight for Victorian England, and straight for wealthy elites for which the rules are always much different - aka straw man. Try looking at the entire rest of the world throughout the entire rest of history. You may find that leadership and wealthy elites primarily focused on males, but that's the same fallacy feminism commits now: apex fallacy. Check this out, as a random example: (Rome) In the early Empire, the legal standing of daughters differs little if at all from that of sons. … | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 06:04 PM |
| 6 | This guy was being called a pansy on the radio for being abused by his wife. He called to promote his indiegogo to be able to see his daughterI think it dates to when women were property. Unfortunately for this myth, women were rarely, if ever, considered 'property'. This may have been the case in regards to ultra rich elites, but women were pretty much always regarded as equals with different roles among the majority of the population. Women could inherit property and even run businesses. In many cases, women were actually expected to run the family business if her husband died. It's absolute nonsense to think the dynamics of love an… | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 05:45 PM |
| 3 | Can I convince my fiancee that the wage gap is a myth?Have you discussed marriage and its problems with her? I have, with my girlfriend, and she's very understanding. It actually pisses her off that we can't really get married - because, even if we did, I wouldn't be the same person anymore. Somebody having a 'destruct' button for your life changes how you act. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 03:54 PM |
| 1 | Can I convince my fiancee that the wage gap is a myth?Don't get married at all. Read up on why. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 03:16 AM |
| 1 | Slate: Women Editors-in-Chief Make $15,000 Less Than Men -Thoughts?Wow, yes, this :) | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 03:15 AM |
| 5 | Slate: Women Editors-in-Chief Make $15,000 Less Than Men -Thoughts?This average pay gap nonsense needs to go away. Pay is an individual achievement. "Women" have nothing in common. "Men" have nothing in common. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/12 08:04 PM |
| 7 | Anything other than 100% consent is rape! We are all rapists (men and women).I take issue with the very notion that life can achieve an idealized state where everything is 100% known and safe. We live in a reality full of unknowns and fuzzy logic. Radical feminism seems to deny this fact. Consent (and sex itself) is a negotiation game that involves body language, implied emotions, and each participant choosing to play particular roles. There is 100% anti-consent, certainly, and the existence of such is logically required for a sex act to become criminal - but there is ne… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/12 05:15 PM |
| 8 | Men set to live as long as women, figures showFucking brilliant. Feminism: women have been the victims of 50% of ALL DEATHS throughout history. Clearly something needs to be done! | /r/MensRights | 26/09/12 03:17 PM |
| -3 | Why all this matters.No, he said the one place that isn't controlled by propaganda is the target of said propaganda, so it's a Catch-22. Try harder. There are much better threads to troll in. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/12 01:36 AM |
| -12 | Why all this matters.That's not sexism. That's a general statement about 1) an ongoing nationwide propaganda campaign and 2) a general group that is not a part of it. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/12 01:24 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter